Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.01
ETP's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
77% of the 93 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.04 vs. ETP: 0.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
ETP' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.02 Max: 0.16
Current: 0.01
0.01
0.16
Debt-to-EBITDA 5.39
ETP's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
79% of the 98 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 4.43 vs. ETP: 5.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-EBITDA only.
ETP' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.04  Med: 5 Max: 7.28
Current: 5.39
4.04
7.28
Interest Coverage 2.65
ETP's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
74% of the 105 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 4.51 vs. ETP: 2.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
ETP' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.95  Med: 2.61 Max: 4.21
Current: 2.65
1.95
4.21
WACC vs ROIC
10.27%
-0.59%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 3/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 11.95
ETP's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
68% of the 108 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 21.95 vs. ETP: 11.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
ETP' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.78  Med: 11.61 Max: 20.81
Current: 11.95
4.78
20.81
Net Margin % 8.12
ETP's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
56% of the 108 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 10.85 vs. ETP: 8.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
ETP' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.94  Med: 8.24 Max: 14.61
Current: 8.12
0.94
14.61
ROE % 62.66
ETP's ROE % is ranked lower than
58% of the 104 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 8.53 vs. ETP: 62.66 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
ETP' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.67  Med: 14.99 Max: 62.66
Current: 62.66
-0.67
62.66
ROA % 3.78
ETP's ROA % is ranked lower than
57% of the 113 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 4.17 vs. ETP: 3.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
ETP' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.43  Med: 3.83 Max: 9.45
Current: 3.78
0.43
9.45
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 7.92
ETP's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
74% of the 109 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 9.50 vs. ETP: 7.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
ETP' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.36  Med: 9.8 Max: 16.38
Current: 7.92
5.36
16.38
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -36.80
ETP's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
93% of the 98 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: -1.40 vs. ETP: -36.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
ETP' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -38.9  Med: 2.55 Max: 81
Current: -36.8
-38.9
81
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -15.40
ETP's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
83% of the 89 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 4.00 vs. ETP: -15.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
ETP' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 6.65 Max: 39.6
Current: -15.4
0
39.6
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -4.10
ETP's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
66% of the 80 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 7.30 vs. ETP: -4.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
ETP' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -17.55 Max: 129.2
Current: -4.1
0
129.2
GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with Energy Transfer Partners LP ETP.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» ETP's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2018-08-08)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2017

ETP Guru Trades in Q2 2017

T Boone Pickens 409,116 sh (+179.27%)
Ronald Muhlenkamp 24,960 sh (+45.45%)
David Tepper 14,841,247 sh (+24.07%)
Howard Marks 267,000 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Leon Cooperman 1,169,142 sh (-14.87%)
» More
Q3 2017

ETP Guru Trades in Q3 2017

Ken Fisher 42,814 sh (New)
Jim Simons 1,160,500 sh (New)
Leon Cooperman 1,581,194 sh (+35.24%)
T Boone Pickens 429,242 sh (+4.92%)
Howard Marks 267,000 sh (unchged)
Ronald Muhlenkamp 24,960 sh (unchged)
David Tepper 11,950,000 sh (-19.48%)
» More
Q4 2017

ETP Guru Trades in Q4 2017

Jim Simons 1,866,900 sh (+60.87%)
T Boone Pickens 485,870 sh (+13.19%)
Howard Marks 267,000 sh (unchged)
Leon Cooperman Sold Out
Ronald Muhlenkamp Sold Out
Ken Fisher Sold Out
David Tepper 8,180,094 sh (-31.55%)
» More
Q1 2018

ETP Guru Trades in Q1 2018

Steven Cohen 4,981,800 sh (unchged)
Howard Marks Sold Out
T Boone Pickens 447,043 sh (-7.99%)
Jim Simons 1,574,229 sh (-15.68%)
David Tepper 6,687,818 sh (-18.24%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with NYSE:ETP

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
David Tepper 2018-03-31 Reduce -18.24%0.25%$16.06 - $20.71 $ 18.982%6,687,818
T Boone Pickens 2018-03-31 Reduce -7.99%0.25%$16.06 - $20.71 $ 18.982%447,043
David Tepper 2017-12-31 Reduce -31.55%0.97%$15.71 - $18.75 $ 18.9810%8,180,094
T Boone Pickens 2017-12-31 Add 13.19%0.37%$15.71 - $18.75 $ 18.9810%485,870
Ken Fisher 2017-12-31 Sold Out $15.71 - $18.75 $ 18.9810%0
Ronald Muhlenkamp 2017-12-31 Sold Out 0.14%$15.71 - $18.75 $ 18.9810%0
Leon Cooperman 2017-12-31 Sold Out 1.12%$15.71 - $18.75 $ 18.9810%0
David Tepper 2017-09-30 Reduce -19.48%0.87%$17.96 - $21.35 $ 18.98-2%11,950,000
Leon Cooperman 2017-09-30 Add 35.24%0.29%$17.96 - $21.35 $ 18.98-2%1,581,194
T Boone Pickens 2017-09-30 Add 4.92%0.16%$17.96 - $21.35 $ 18.98-2%429,242
Ken Fisher 2017-09-30 New Buy$17.96 - $21.35 $ 18.98-2%42,814
David Tepper 2017-06-30 Add 24.07%0.87%$18.46 - $24.35 $ 18.98-15%14,841,247
Leon Cooperman 2017-06-30 Reduce -14.87%0.3%$18.46 - $24.35 $ 18.98-15%1,169,142
T Boone Pickens 2017-06-30 Add 179.27%2.57%$18.46 - $24.35 $ 18.98-15%409,116
Ronald Muhlenkamp 2017-06-30 Add 45.45%0.05%$18.46 - $24.35 $ 18.98-15%24,960
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!
Premium More recent guru trades are included for USA Subscribe Members only!!
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Preferred stocks of Energy Transfer Partners LP

SymbolPriceYieldDescription
ETPpC.PFD25.050.00FXDFR PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser C

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - Midstream » Oil & Gas Midstream    NAICS: 453998    SIC: 4922
Compare:NYSE:WMB, NYSE:OKE, MIC:TRNFP, NYSE:PAA, NYSE:MPLX, NYSE:SEP, NYSE:ETE, NYSE:PAGP, TSX:PPL, AMEX:CQP, NYSE:MMP, AMEX:LNG, NYSE:ANDX, NYSE:TRGP, NYSE:KMI, NYSE:WPZ, NYSE:ENBL, NYSE:WES, TSX:TRP, NYSE:WGP » details
Traded in other countries:4ETA.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Energy Transfer Partners LP is engaged in the crude oil operations consist of an integrated set of pipeline, terminalling, and acquisition and marketing of crude oil from producers to end-user markets.

Energy Transfer Partners is one of the largest diversified master limited partnerships with a strong platform of crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids assets primarily in Texas and the U.S. midcontinent region. Following the 2017 merger with Sunoco and the PennTex unit purchase, ETP owns 71,000 miles of pipelines and a large network of refined product distribution. ETP also will be a part owner in the Lake Charles LNG export facility.

Top Ranked Articles about Energy Transfer Partners LP

Detailed Research: Economic Perspectives on CASI Pharmaceuticals, Energy Transfer Partners, Cypress Semiconductor, Xcel Energy, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, and KalVista Pharmaceuticals — What Drives Growth in Today's Competitive Landscape
Weekly Top Insider Buys Highlight for the Week of March 23 The largest Insider Buys this week were for The Home Depot Inc. (HD), Energy Transfer Partners LP (ETP), Tiffany & Co. (TIF), and Enbridge Inc. (ENB).
The largest Insider Buys this week were for The Home Depot Inc. (NYSE:HD), Energy Transfer Partners LP (NYSE:ETP), Tiffany & Co. (NYSE:TIF), and Enbridge Inc. (NYSE:ENB). Read more...
Alerian Index Series March 2018 Index Review
Ronald Muhlenkamp's Largest Sales of the 4th Quarter Guru trims ON Semiconductor, exits Dynagas, Energy Transfer Partners
Ronald Muhlenkamp (TradesPortfolio), founder of Muhlenkamp & Company, sold shares of the following stocks during the fourth quarter. Read more...
T. Boone Pickens: A Man With a Plan Having just retired from the hedge fund business, the oil tycoon can look back on many successes
Sunoco LP and Energy Transfer Announce Redemption of Sunoco Series A Preferred Units and Repurchase of Sunoco Common Units
T. Boone Pickens Shuts Down Hedge Fund: A Final Look at His Best Ideas T. Boone Pickens Shuts Down Hedge Fund because of health problems and underperformance. He was betting big on the resurgence of midstream
T. Boone Pickens, a oil trader and guru, is shutting his hedge-fund focused on energy. He revealed to the WSJ his health is declining and returns have not been great. This is only the last among a number of high profile (value) investors shutting funds. Richard Perry (Trades, Portfolio) shut down a fund after 26 years in 2016. Hugh Henry shut his fund in 2017. The move from passive towards active is taking a toll on value minded managers. Pickens built his entire and remarkable career on energy business & trading:

In 2006, Pickens earned $990 million from his equity in the two funds and $120 million from his share of the 20% fees applied to fund profits.[15] In 2007, Pickens earned $2.7 billion, as BP Capital Equity Fund grew by 24% after fees, and the then $590 million Capital Commodity fund grew 40%, thanks to, among others, large positions in the stocks of Suncor Energy, ExxonMobil and Occidental Petroleum.[16]
Pickens' most recent recognition comes from The Franklin Institute in Philadelphia. T. Boone Pickens received the 2009 Bower Award for Business Leadership for 50 years of visionary leadership in oil and other types of energy production, including domestic renewable energy, and for his philanthropic leadership contributing to education, medical research, and wildlife conservation. [17]

Pickens is known for his volatile returns and ability to make big bets. I've been looking at his portfolio for the past few years looking for great energy ideas to research. With that opportunity fleeting I wanted to research and highlight his current portfolio as tracked by GuruFocus:
Ticker
Company
Industry
Market Cap ($ Mil)
% Weighting as of 2017-09-30
EPD
Enterprise Products Partners LP
Oil & Gas - Midstream
62,196
4.54%
PSXP
Phillips 66 Partners LP
Oil & Gas - Midstream
6,675
4.28%
WPZ
Williams Partners LP
Oil & Gas - Midstream
41,787
4.20%
MPLX
MPLX LP
Oil & Gas - Midstream
15,688
3.40%
ETP
Energy Transfer Partners LP
Oil & Gas - Midstream
23,006
3.39%
BPL
Buckeye Partners LP
Oil & Gas - Midstream
7,872
3.09%
TRGP
Targa Resources Corp
Oil & Gas - Midstream
11,051
3.08%
WES
Western Gas Partners, LP
Oil & Gas - Midstream
8,880
2.77%
FANG
Diamondback Energy Inc
Oil & Gas - E&P
12,795
2.51%
RSPP
RSP Permian Inc
Oil & Gas - Drilling
6,685
2.42%
AA
Alcoa Corp
Metals & Mining
10,487
2.36%
PTEN
Patterson-UTI Energy Inc
Oil & Gas - Drilling
5,497
2.35%
MMP
Magellan Midstream Partners LP
Oil & Gas - Midstream
16,997
2.33%
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp
Oil & Gas - Services
1,747
2.24%
HAL
Halliburton Co
Oil & Gas - Services
46,349
2.19%
EOG
EOG Resources Inc
Oil & Gas - E&P
67,068
2.13%
WPX
WPX Energy Inc
Oil & Gas - E&P
6,004
2.12%
HUN
Huntsman Corp
Chemicals
8,247
2.04%
PE
Parsley Energy Inc
Oil & Gas - E&P
9,042
1.99%
APC
Anadarko Petroleum Corp
Oil & Gas - E&P
32,217
1.98%
If we look at his current portfolio the big bet isn't immediately obvious. If you look through the names among his top 20 positions you will find in excess of 30% of his portfolio is actually invested in midstream aka pipeline companies.
Enterprise Product Partners (NYSE:EPD) is his largest position. This is a company with an extremely valuable network of midstream assets in oil & gas. Natural gas is very important to the firm. In addition it has a really terrific management team who own quite a bit of equity in the operation. There's a good reason for it being undervalued as it recently lowered its guidance for forward distributions. These midstream firms are often bought as yield plays and income investors tend to react poorly to distribution cuts.
Pipelines in general are terrific assets because they hold a competitive cost advantage over other forms of transportation. Even transport by rail is signficantly more expensive. Generally a competitor won't build another pipeline to serve the exact same route as that's very expensive but there's isn't always enough demand to support both pipelines. If demand grows the original pipeline can usually be expanded at lower cost. Anyone who ever turns on business radio is aware of the difficulties and cost of building a pipeline. The NIMBY attitude is strong and it is generally fought tooth and nail. Usually customers are locked into very long term contracts up to two decades which prevents them from switching to a competitor even IF a competing pipeline got built.
From a historical perspective the pipelines still look rather cheap and perhaps Pickens is closing his fund prematurely. Ironically, fund closings
Ideas that look particularly attractive to me include Enterprise Product Partners (NYSE:EPD), Williams Partners (NYSE:WPZ) and Energy Transfer Partners (NYSE:ETP) because of their attractive high value asset base, great management teams and low valuations.
Disclosure: Author is long WPZ. Read more...
Factors of Influence in 2018, Key Indicators and Opportunity within Energy Transfer, Hologic, Sabre, 22nd Century Group, CF Industries, and Pandora Media – New Research Emphasizes Economic Growth
52-Week Company Lows Prices fall for General Electric, Kraft Heinz, Kinder Morgan, General Mills, Energy Transfer Partners and Kellogg
According to GuruFocus’ list, these stocks have reached their 52-week lows. Read more...
52-Week Company Lows Prices fall for General Electric, Altria Group, Kraft Heinz, General Mills, Energy Transfer Partners and Kellogg
According to GuruFocus, these stocks have reached their 52-week lows. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 16.96
ETP's PE Ratio is ranked higher than
83% of the 94 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. ETP: 16.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
ETP' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.81  Med: 24.12 Max: 1877.5
Current: 16.96
6.81
1877.5
Forward PE Ratio 18.21
ETP's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
51% of the 70 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 18.12 vs. ETP: 18.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 16.96
ETP's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked higher than
85% of the 91 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 19.54 vs. ETP: 16.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
ETP' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.81  Med: 24.45 Max: 473.55
Current: 16.96
6.81
473.55
PS Ratio 0.69
ETP's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
81% of the 105 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.30 vs. ETP: 0.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
ETP' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.28  Med: 0.79 Max: 1.87
Current: 0.69
0.28
1.87
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 4.02
ETP's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
86% of the 94 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 7.92 vs. ETP: 4.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
ETP' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.06  Med: 6.52 Max: 10.53
Current: 4.02
3.06
10.53
EV-to-EBIT 15.96
ETP's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
70% of the 96 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 18.53 vs. ETP: 15.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
ETP' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8  Med: 15.2 Max: 28.9
Current: 15.96
8
28.9
EV-to-EBITDA 9.85
ETP's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
52% of the 103 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 12.84 vs. ETP: 9.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
ETP' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.9  Med: 10.7 Max: 14.8
Current: 9.85
4.9
14.8
EV-to-Revenue 2.01
ETP's EV-to-Revenue is ranked higher than
71% of the 107 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 4.87 vs. ETP: 2.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
ETP' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.8  Med: 1.8 Max: 3.2
Current: 2.01
0.8
3.2
Shiller PE Ratio 19.42
ETP's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
75% of the 44 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 19.42 vs. ETP: 19.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
ETP' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.44  Med: 19.9 Max: 41.61
Current: 19.42
10.44
41.61
Current Ratio 0.92
ETP's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
56% of the 108 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.00 vs. ETP: 0.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
ETP' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.16  Med: 1.02 Max: 1.81
Current: 0.92
0.16
1.81
Quick Ratio 0.70
ETP's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
69% of the 108 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.93 vs. ETP: 0.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
ETP' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.12  Med: 0.75 Max: 1.37
Current: 0.7
0.12
1.37
Days Inventory 21.57
ETP's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
76% of the 80 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 13.28 vs. ETP: 21.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
ETP' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.98  Med: 24.72 Max: 32.03
Current: 21.57
10.98
32.03
Days Sales Outstanding 37.45
ETP's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
85% of the 96 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 34.27 vs. ETP: 37.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
ETP' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 22.11  Med: 32.21 Max: 67.64
Current: 37.45
22.11
67.64
Days Payable 50.02
ETP's Days Payable is ranked higher than
66% of the 76 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 48.11 vs. ETP: 50.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
ETP' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 18.02  Med: 30.89 Max: 82.89
Current: 50.02
18.02
82.89

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 11.83
ETP's Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
75% of the 116 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 8.48 vs. ETP: 11.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
ETP' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.67  Med: 7.87 Max: 17.33
Current: 11.83
4.67
17.33
Dividend Payout Ratio 1.94
ETP's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked lower than
83% of the 120 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.00 vs. ETP: 1.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
ETP' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.73  Med: 2.4 Max: 3.19
Current: 1.94
0.73
3.19
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate -2.30
ETP's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked lower than
82% of the 67 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 7.80 vs. ETP: -2.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
ETP' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 4.85 Max: 31.3
Current: -2.3
0
31.3
Forward Dividend Yield % 11.91
ETP's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
81% of the 121 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 8.78 vs. ETP: 11.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 12.73
ETP's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked higher than
54% of the 121 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 13.08 vs. ETP: 12.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
ETP' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.03  Med: 8.48 Max: 18.67
Current: 12.73
5.03
18.67
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -25.90
ETP's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
85% of the 81 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: -8.90 vs. ETP: -25.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
ETP' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -73.6  Med: -21.65 Max: -11.8
Current: -25.9
-73.6
-11.8

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.89
ETP's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
70% of the 94 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.94 vs. ETP: 0.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
ETP' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.38  Med: 0.94 Max: 2.24
Current: 0.89
0.38
2.24
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 6.28
ETP's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
60% of the 111 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 4.95 vs. ETP: 6.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
ETP' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.5  Med: 6.6 Max: 12.5
Current: 6.28
3.5
12.5
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -32.71
ETP's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
96% of the 57 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.64 vs. ETP: -32.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
ETP' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -38.1  Med: 2.2 Max: 21
Current: -32.71
-38.1
21

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $30,439.00
EPS (TTM) $ 1.12
Beta1.75
Volatility26.18%
52-Week Range $15.06 - 23.72
Shares Outstanding (Mil)1,165.13

Analyst Estimate

Dec18 Dec19 Dec20
Revenue (Mil $) 34,755 36,494 41,343
EBIT (Mil $) 4,418 4,849 6,566
EBITDA (Mil $) 7,155 7,634 8,993
EPS ($) 1.30 1.39 1.67
EPS without NRI ($) 1.30 1.39 1.67
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
20.95%
Dividends per Share ($) 2.26 2.37 2.42

Piotroski F-Score Details

Piotroski F-Score: ----
Positive ROAN
Positive CFROAN
Higher ROA yoyN
CFROA > ROAN
Lower Leverage yoyN
Higher Current Ratio yoyN
Less Shares Outstanding yoyN
Higher Gross Margin yoyN
Higher Asset Turnover yoyN

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}