Switch to:
Also traded in: Austria, Brazil, Canada, Germany, Mexico, Switzerland, UK

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.26
GM's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
70% of the 1305 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 0.61 vs. GM: 0.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
GM' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.25  Med: 0.6 Max: 2.47
Current: 0.26
0.25
2.47
Equity-to-Asset 0.17
GM's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
93% of the 1302 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 0.48 vs. GM: 0.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
GM' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.94  Med: 0.2 Max: 0.26
Current: 0.17
-0.94
0.26
Debt-to-Equity 2.70
GM's Debt-to-Equity is ranked lower than
95% of the 1064 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 0.52 vs. GM: 2.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-Equity only.
GM' s Debt-to-Equity Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.54  Med: 0.85 Max: 2.7
Current: 2.7
-0.54
2.7
Debt-to-EBITDA 4.59
GM's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
73% of the 1083 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 2.44 vs. GM: 4.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-EBITDA only.
GM' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.13  Med: 3.01 Max: 4.59
Current: 4.59
0.13
4.59
Interest Coverage 6.79
GM's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
59% of the 1137 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 9.76 vs. GM: 6.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
GM' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.09  Med: 11.96 Max: 17.42
Current: 6.79
4.09
17.42
Piotroski F-Score: 7
Altman Z-Score: 1.05
Beneish M-Score: -2.49
WACC vs ROIC
3.19%
3.66%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 3.02
GM's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
66% of the 1316 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 5.43 vs. GM: 3.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
GM' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -20.1  Med: 3.43 Max: 6.88
Current: 3.02
-20.1
6.88
Net Margin % 5.45
GM's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
64% of the 1317 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 3.45 vs. GM: 5.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
GM' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.65  Med: 5 Max: 100.22
Current: 5.45
-2.65
100.22
ROE % 21.70
GM's ROE % is ranked higher than
86% of the 1288 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 8.51 vs. GM: 21.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
GM' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9.84  Med: 16.26 Max: 25.72
Current: 21.7
-9.84
25.72
ROA % 3.63
GM's ROA % is ranked lower than
52% of the 1329 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 3.84 vs. GM: 3.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
GM' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.78  Med: 4.35 Max: 92.22
Current: 3.63
-1.78
92.22
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 11.31
GM's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
56% of the 1326 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 12.94 vs. GM: 11.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
GM' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -122  Med: 18.56 Max: 372.28
Current: 11.31
-122
372.28
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 3.40
GM's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
52% of the 1256 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 3.70 vs. GM: 3.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
GM' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -29.5  Med: 1.35 Max: 4.5
Current: 3.4
-29.5
4.5
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 17.50
GM's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
74% of the 1151 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 5.90 vs. GM: 17.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
GM' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 9.45 Max: 32.9
Current: 17.5
0
32.9
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -1.80
GM's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
66% of the 1029 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 7.30 vs. GM: -1.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
GM' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -17.55 Max: 36.1
Current: -1.8
0
36.1
» GM's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2019-04-26)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2018

GM Guru Trades in Q1 2018

John Hussman 50,000 sh (New)
Lee Ainslie 99,140 sh (New)
Robert Olstein 195,000 sh (+45.52%)
NWQ Managers 1,883,344 sh (+20.23%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 13,076,162 sh (+9.88%)
John Buckingham 170,727 sh (+1.86%)
Louis Moore Bacon 70,000 sh (+75.00%)
Pioneer Investments 672,855 sh (+22.04%)
Julian Robertson 40,000 sh (+33.33%)
Bill Nygren 6,850,000 sh (unchged)
Warren Buffett 50,000,000 sh (unchged)
David Dreman 174 sh (unchged)
Robert Bruce 450,000 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen 800,000 sh (unchged)
Louis Moore Bacon 170,000 sh (unchged)
Ken Fisher Sold Out
Richard Pzena Sold Out
George Soros 600,000 sh (-0.02%)
Joel Greenblatt 1,082,208 sh (-24.57%)
Richard Snow 45,010 sh (-3.26%)
David Einhorn 22,614,400 sh (-12.56%)
Murray Stahl 29,604 sh (-1.48%)
Jeremy Grantham 2,407,900 sh (-2.13%)
Jeff Auxier 34,949 sh (-0.62%)
Steven Cohen 1,352,900 sh (-52.07%)
Paul Tudor Jones 18,948 sh (-69.80%)
Jim Simons 2,628,710 sh (-50.50%)
Caxton Associates 22,359 sh (-87.22%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 180 sh (-0.55%)
Mario Gabelli 106,430 sh (-2.61%)
Jana Partners 1,308,494 sh (-0.02%)
» More
Q2 2018

GM Guru Trades in Q2 2018

Prem Watsa 80,465 sh (New)
Warren Buffett 51,393,611 sh (+2.79%)
Louis Moore Bacon 400,000 sh (+471.43%)
Pioneer Investments 750,960 sh (+11.61%)
Robert Bruce 450,000 sh (unchged)
Murray Stahl 29,604 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen 600,000 sh (unchged)
Louis Moore Bacon 100,000 sh (unchged)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 180 sh (unchged)
Julian Robertson 40,000 sh (unchged)
Bill Nygren 6,850,000 sh (unchged)
George Soros Sold Out
Lee Ainslie Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Robert Olstein 162,000 sh (-16.92%)
Joel Greenblatt 40,966 sh (-96.21%)
Richard Snow 40,098 sh (-10.91%)
David Einhorn 21,160,843 sh (-6.43%)
NWQ Managers 1,615,707 sh (-14.21%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 12,869,583 sh (-1.58%)
John Buckingham 168,501 sh (-1.30%)
John Hussman 25,000 sh (-50.00%)
Jeremy Grantham 1,361,216 sh (-43.47%)
Steven Cohen 685,400 sh (-49.34%)
Caxton Associates 9,669 sh (-56.76%)
Mario Gabelli 89,790 sh (-15.63%)
Jana Partners 637,703 sh (-51.26%)
Jim Simons 740,180 sh (-71.84%)
Jeff Auxier 34,749 sh (-0.57%)
» More
Q3 2018

GM Guru Trades in Q3 2018

Richard Pzena 739,178 sh (New)
Mario Gabelli 89,840 sh (+0.06%)
Robert Olstein 202,000 sh (+24.69%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 1,231,298 sh (+683954.44%)
Prem Watsa 375,965 sh (+367.24%)
Pioneer Investments 975,947 sh (+29.96%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 15,558,026 sh (+20.89%)
Julian Robertson 60,000 sh (+50.00%)
Murray Stahl 29,749 sh (+0.49%)
NWQ Managers 1,816,843 sh (+12.45%)
Warren Buffett 52,461,411 sh (+2.08%)
Caxton Associates 12,668 sh (+31.02%)
John Buckingham 173,276 sh (+2.83%)
John Hussman 25,000 sh (unchged)
Louis Moore Bacon 100,000 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen 600,000 sh (unchged)
Jeff Auxier 34,749 sh (unchged)
Bill Nygren 6,850,000 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Louis Moore Bacon Sold Out
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Robert Bruce 425,000 sh (-5.56%)
Richard Snow 30,626 sh (-23.62%)
Jeremy Grantham 1,209,516 sh (-11.14%)
Jana Partners 280,560 sh (-56.00%)
David Einhorn 14,881,043 sh (-29.68%)
Steven Cohen 164,732 sh (-75.97%)
» More
Q4 2018

GM Guru Trades in Q4 2018

Diamond Hill Capital 4,308,267 sh (New)
Louis Moore Bacon 75,000 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 628,423 sh (New)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 16,965,304 sh (+9.05%)
Steven Cohen 189,300 sh (+14.91%)
Warren Buffett 72,269,696 sh (+37.76%)
Pioneer Investments 1,340,728 sh (+37.38%)
Bill Nygren 9,650,000 sh (+40.88%)
Prem Watsa 375,965 sh (unchged)
John Hussman Sold Out
Julian Robertson Sold Out
Jana Partners Sold Out
Caxton Associates Sold Out
Mario Gabelli 75,910 sh (-15.51%)
Richard Pzena 34,720 sh (-95.30%)
Robert Olstein 168,000 sh (-16.83%)
Jeremy Grantham 920,000 sh (-23.94%)
Richard Snow 18,461 sh (-39.72%)
Jeff Auxier 34,699 sh (-0.14%)
NWQ Managers 1,716,482 sh (-5.52%)
Murray Stahl 29,674 sh (-0.25%)
David Einhorn 11,944,243 sh (-19.74%)
Robert Bruce 315,000 sh (-25.88%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 1,165,720 sh (-5.33%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with NYSE:GM

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

Guru Date Action
Impact Price Range
(Average)*
Change from Average Comment Current Shares
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Autos » Auto Manufacturers    NAICS: 336211    SIC: 3711
Compare:NAS:TSLA, NYSE:F, SHSE:600104, MIL:FCA, TSE:7201, TSE:7267, XTER:NSU, LSE:HYUP, NSE:MARUTI, XTER:BMW, XPAR:RNO, MIL:RACE, XTER:PAH3, TSE:7270, TSE:7269, HKSE:00175, XPAR:UG, HKSE:01211, XTER:DAI, HKSE:02238 » details
Traded in other countries:GMOT.Austria, GMCO34.Brazil, GMM.U.Canada, 8GM.Germany, GM.Mexico, GM.Switzerland, 0R0E.UK,
Headquarter Location:USA
General Motors Company is an American multinational corporation. It designs, builds and sells cars, trucks and automobile parts. The company also provides automotive financing services through General Motors Financial Company, Inc.

General Motors Co. emerged from the bankruptcy of General Motors Corp. (old GM) in July 2009. GM has eight brands and operates under three segments: GM North America, GM International, and GM Financial. The United States now has four brands instead of eight. The company remains the market leader in the U.S. with 17.4% share in 2017. GM Financial became the company's captive finance arm in October 2010 via the purchase of AmeriCredit.

Guru Investment Theses on General Motors Co

David Herro Comments on General Motors - Jan 09, 2019

Financial industry holdings, such as Lloyds, impaired portfolio return in 2018, and the consumer durables industry, including automobile manufacturers, was another that meaningfully detracted. We continue to believe that the automotive sector is attractively priced and that its business fundamentals are far outperforming share price outcomes. GM (NYSE:GM) is the Fund’s fifth-largest holding, which we purchased long before the company’s late 2016 acquisition of Cruise Automation, its autonomous vehicle unit. In May, Softbank announced a $2.25 billion investment in Cruise to obtain an approximately 20% interest in that subsidiary. Given that GM had only paid $1 billion for this business, the implied increase in value in less than two years was nothing less than extraordinary. But Softbank was not the last to make such an investment. In October, Honda Motor also made an investment in Cruise at a price that implied an even larger valuation of the subsidiary: $14.6 billion. This value exceeds 20% of the total market value of GM, and all this for a business that has yet to produce revenues or earnings. GM now trades around the price as when it went public in 2010 ($33). Since then, the company has cumulatively earned more than $33 per share and paid out nearly $7 per share in dividends. Additionally, management has simplified the product lineup, exited poorly performing international markets and reduced the company’s excess assembly capacity. Critics of the stock will point to economic cycle maturity, tariffs and the long-term threat from autonomous vehicles and ride-sharing. We think these concerns are overstated. By our estimate, nearly 75% of the company’s earnings come from pickup trucks and large sport utility vehicles where GM has a dominant and protected competitive moat. We believe this segment is worth more than the current stock price even before giving credit for Cruise or the company’s valuable China business. Selling at a very modest multiple of 2019 earnings and offering an attractive and well-supported dividend yield, GM remains a particularly compelling investment opportunity, in our view.We recognize that uncertainties surrounding Brexit could create a softer economic environment. To analyze this risk, we have factored in various adverse scenarios to gauge the potential effects on Lloyds’ earnings and its capital, and as a result, we believe that the company will be able to navigate any short-term headwinds because of its strong earnings generation, conservative underwriting and large excess capital position. We estimate conservatively that Lloyds is trading at 5-6x reported 2020 earnings and approximately 0.8x its 2020 tangible book value. This is a highly discounted valuation for a best-in-class financial institution.

From David Herro (Trades, Portfolio)'s Oakmark Global Fund fourth-quarter 2018 shareholder letter.

Check out David Herro latest stock trades

David Einhorn Comments on General Motors Company - May 17, 2017

While it was quiet on the portfolio front, we made more noise than usual (and more than we’d like) by making public our idea for General Motors Company (NYSE:GM) to unlock tens of billions of dollars of shareholder value. As a general matter, we prefer to avoid public activism. The last time we did this was with AAPL in 2013 after owning the stock for three years. This is a similar situation; we had owned GM shares for years before advancing our idea to management.



When we offer companies private advice, they either take it, or they explain why they are not going to take it. Usually if they reject the idea, we understand the reasoning and prefer not to press the issue. Sometimes, we agree to disagree, and then decide whether to hold the stock or exit the position.



In the case of GM, we felt the need to press the issue as we believe there is a lot of value to unlock and the company did not fairly evaluate our idea. Management made a decision and then spent a great deal of effort coming up with reasons to justify that decision. To poison our idea, management went so far as to misrepresent our proposal to the credit rating agencies, allowing them to claim that the company’s credit standing would be in jeopardy if it implemented our idea. Ironically, our idea was designed to be credit positive and the least invasive way to unlock billions of dollars of shareholder value. This sort of behavior by management leaves us no room to agree to disagree.



We know this is a tough fight. Fortunately, the math is on our side (if GM does what we suggest, we believe the stock will go up a lot) and the ultimate decision will be made by our fellow shareholders. We believe others recognize that the stock is deeply undervalued and when shareholders grasp the math and the extent of GM’s behavior, they will vote with their wallets and for needed change at the Board level.



  • From Einhorn's first-quarter 2017 shareholder commentary.


Check out David Einhorn latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about General Motors Co

Recent Analysis Shows General Motors, AvalonBay Communities, AerCap Holdings N.V., KBR, Ternium S.A., and Kadant Market Influences — Renewed Outlook, Key Drivers of Growth
US Auto Sales Fall in February Mounting interest rates is expected to hamper car demand this year
U.S. auto sales for February, which came out on Friday, plunged year-over-year owing to low demand for SUVs. In fact, new vehicle sales failed to meet expectations. Factors that adversely impacted the month’s sales report also included rising vehicle prices and interest rates, costs associated with import tariffs and cold weather. Read more...
Robert Bruce Trims General Motors, Amerco Positions Guru's largest sales of the 4th quarter
Robert Bruce (Trades, Portfolio)'s Bruce & Co. sold shares of the following stocks during the fourth quarter. Read more...
Wesley G. Bush Appointed to GM Board of Directors
GM Posts Solid Results The automaker's bold restructuring plan goes ahead
On Wednesday, General Motors (NYSE:GM) announced its results for the fourth quarter of the company’s fiscal year 2018. This was the first quarterly report to come out of the Detroit-based automaker since CEO Mary Barra announced a sweeping restructuring effort, promising to lay off 15% of GM’s workforce, close five manufacturing plants and discontinue the production of six sedan models. Read more...
General Motors Posts Strong 4th Quarter Slow growth in China was offset by robust sales of higher-priced trucks in the US
General Motors Co. (NYSE:GM) released its fourth-quarter results before the opening bell on Feb. 6. Read more...
GM Reports Another Strong Year of Earnings
GM Declares Quarterly Dividend
Using Dividends as Signals How Bruce Berkowitz uses dividends to evaluate company management
In an earlier piece, we explored what free cash flow really is, and looked at Bruce Berkowitz (Trades, Portfolio)’s advice for calculating it in the real world. Today, let's dive into what Berkowitz has to say about using dividends as signals of broader company value. Read more...
General Motors Strengthens Core Business and Future Mobility

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 6.77
GM's PE Ratio is ranked higher than
86% of the 1083 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 13.25 vs. GM: 6.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
GM' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.52  Med: 9.7 Max: 62.21
Current: 6.77
3.52
62.21
Forward PE Ratio 5.48
GM's Forward PE Ratio is ranked higher than
87% of the 223 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 9.03 vs. GM: 5.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 6.71
GM's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked higher than
86% of the 1071 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 13.39 vs. GM: 6.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
GM' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.56  Med: 9.56 Max: 314.79
Current: 6.71
3.56
314.79
PB Ratio 1.33
GM's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
56% of the 1305 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.26 vs. GM: 1.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
GM' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.92  Med: 1.39 Max: 2.27
Current: 1.33
0.92
2.27
PS Ratio 0.36
GM's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
66% of the 1312 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 0.63 vs. GM: 0.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
GM' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.22  Med: 0.34 Max: 0.45
Current: 0.36
0.22
0.45
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 3.51
GM's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
84% of the 820 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 9.57 vs. GM: 3.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
GM' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.73  Med: 4.15 Max: 8.83
Current: 3.51
2.73
8.83
EV-to-EBIT 14.62
GM's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
66% of the 1130 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 11.04 vs. GM: 14.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
GM' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.6  Med: 9.5 Max: 17.7
Current: 14.62
-2.6
17.7
EV-to-EBITDA 5.90
GM's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
69% of the 1205 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 8.37 vs. GM: 5.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
GM' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.6  Med: 5.7 Max: 17.7
Current: 5.9
-2.6
17.7
EV-to-Revenue 0.91
GM's EV-to-Revenue is ranked lower than
56% of the 1316 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 0.81 vs. GM: 0.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
GM' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.2  Med: 0.5 Max: 1
Current: 0.91
0.2
1
PEG Ratio 0.38
GM's PEG Ratio is ranked higher than
87% of the 657 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.18 vs. GM: 0.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
GM' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.12  Med: 0.13 Max: 0.38
Current: 0.38
0.12
0.38
Shiller PE Ratio 2.25
GM's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
99% of the 517 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 15.26 vs. GM: 2.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
GM' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.98  Med: 2.28 Max: 2.4
Current: 2.25
1.98
2.4
Current Ratio 0.92
GM's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
86% of the 1248 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.51 vs. GM: 0.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
GM' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.59  Med: 1.13 Max: 1.31
Current: 0.92
0.59
1.31
Quick Ratio 0.80
GM's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
68% of the 1248 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.04 vs. GM: 0.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
GM' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.41  Med: 0.9 Max: 1.08
Current: 0.8
0.41
1.08
Days Inventory 32.74
GM's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
82% of the 1290 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 62.96 vs. GM: 32.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
GM' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 30.98  Med: 37.34 Max: 38.98
Current: 32.74
30.98
38.98
Days Sales Outstanding 82.90
GM's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
71% of the 1299 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 64.33 vs. GM: 82.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
GM' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 23.42  Med: 56.76 Max: 82.9
Current: 82.9
23.42
82.9
Days Payable 67.45
GM's Days Payable is ranked higher than
56% of the 1263 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 60.97 vs. GM: 67.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
GM' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 59.55  Med: 66.75 Max: 76.04
Current: 67.45
59.55
76.04

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 4.08
GM's Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
74% of the 1450 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 2.69 vs. GM: 4.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
GM' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.8  Med: 4.02 Max: 5.22
Current: 4.08
0.8
5.22
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.27
GM's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked higher than
68% of the 944 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 0.29 vs. GM: 0.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
GM' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.23  Med: 0.27 Max: 6.91
Current: 0.27
0.23
6.91
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 3.30
GM's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked lower than
58% of the 696 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 6.30 vs. GM: 3.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
GM' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 8.2
Current: 3.3
0
8.2
Forward Dividend Yield % 4.11
GM's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
71% of the 1413 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 2.79 vs. GM: 4.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 4.09
GM's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked higher than
57% of the 1420 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 3.36 vs. GM: 4.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
GM' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.8  Med: 4.02 Max: 5.22
Current: 4.09
0.8
5.22
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 2.30
GM's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
92% of the 696 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: -2.30 vs. GM: 2.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
GM' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -39.3  Med: -0.35 Max: 4.4
Current: 2.3
-39.3
4.4

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 1.57
GM's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
56% of the 1282 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.41 vs. GM: 1.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
GM' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.39  Med: 1.9 Max: 2.31
Current: 1.57
1.39
2.31
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.07
GM's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
72% of the 1232 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 0.88 vs. GM: 1.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
GM' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.67  Med: 0.97 Max: 1.27
Current: 1.07
0.67
1.27
Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value 0.27
GM's Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value is ranked higher than
94% of the 406 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 0.88 vs. GM: 0.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value only.
GM' s Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.24  Med: 0.24 Max: 0.27
Current: 0.27
0.24
0.27
Price-to-Graham-Number 0.68
GM's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked higher than
66% of the 977 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 0.96 vs. GM: 0.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
GM' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.6  Med: 1.01 Max: 4.04
Current: 0.68
0.6
4.04
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 6.82
GM's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
55% of the 1357 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 7.56 vs. GM: 6.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
GM' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -73.4  Med: 9.4 Max: 30.1
Current: 6.82
-73.4
30.1
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 4.85
GM's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
54% of the 909 Companies
in the Global Auto Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 7.03 vs. GM: 4.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
GM' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -42.2  Med: -15.5 Max: 6
Current: 4.85
-42.2
6

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $147,049.00
EPS (TTM) $ 5.53
Beta1.01
Volatility31.40%
52-Week Range $30.56 - 45.00
Shares Outstanding (Mil)1,409.48

Analyst Estimate

Dec19 Dec20 Dec21
Revenue (Mil $) 136,393 128,129 131,675
EBIT (Mil $) 6,490 5,732 9,713
EBITDA (Mil $) 11,960 11,219 15,513
EPS ($) 6.37 5.99 7.74
EPS without NRI ($) 6.37 5.99 7.74
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
4.64%
Dividends per Share ($) 1.52 1.52 1.52

Piotroski F-Score Details

Piotroski F-Score: 77
Positive ROAY
Positive CFROAY
Higher ROA yoyY
CFROA > ROAY
Lower Leverage yoyN
Higher Current Ratio yoyY
Less Shares Outstanding yoyY
Higher Gross Margin yoyN
Higher Asset Turnover yoyY

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}