Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany, Mexico

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.06
HLT's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
92% of the 827 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 0.71 vs. HLT: 0.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
HLT' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.04  Med: 0.06 Max: 0.16
Current: 0.06
0.04
0.16
Equity-to-Asset 0.04
HLT's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
95% of the 814 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 0.52 vs. HLT: 0.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
HLT' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.04  Med: 0.18 Max: 0.25
Current: 0.04
0.04
0.25
Debt-to-Equity 13.65
HLT's Debt-to-Equity is ranked lower than
99% of the 646 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 0.44 vs. HLT: 13.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-Equity only.
HLT' s Debt-to-Equity Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.12  Med: 2.76 Max: 13.65
Current: 13.65
1.12
13.65
Debt-to-EBITDA 4.24
HLT's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
68% of the 615 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 2.63 vs. HLT: 4.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-EBITDA only.
HLT' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.92  Med: 6.53 Max: 11.97
Current: 4.24
3.92
11.97
Interest Coverage 3.70
HLT's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 672 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 13.22 vs. HLT: 3.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
HLT' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.62  Med: 2 Max: 3.7
Current: 3.7
0.62
3.7
Piotroski F-Score: 6
Altman Z-Score: 1.21
Beneish M-Score: -2.28
WACC vs ROIC
9.72%
24.34%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 15.73
HLT's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
88% of the 822 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 8.59 vs. HLT: 15.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
HLT' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.25  Med: 12.08 Max: 16.28
Current: 15.73
7.25
16.28
Net Margin % 15.53
HLT's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
79% of the 823 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 5.77 vs. HLT: 15.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
HLT' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.59  Med: 4.49 Max: 19.68
Current: 15.53
1.59
19.68
ROE % 95.28
HLT's ROE % is ranked higher than
99% of the 793 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 6.81 vs. HLT: 95.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
HLT' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.86  Med: 16.89 Max: 95.28
Current: 95.28
5.86
95.28
ROA % 9.83
HLT's ROA % is ranked higher than
85% of the 833 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 3.16 vs. HLT: 9.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
HLT' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.29  Med: 1.85 Max: 9.83
Current: 9.83
1.29
9.83
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 414.09
HLT's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
96% of the 825 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 12.43 vs. HLT: 414.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
HLT' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.96  Med: 17.58 Max: 414.09
Current: 414.09
10.96
414.09
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -4.30
HLT's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
74% of the 755 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 3.50 vs. HLT: -4.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
HLT' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -10.8  Med: -4.3 Max: 8.8
Current: -4.3
-10.8
8.8
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -10.90
HLT's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
80% of the 659 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 5.80 vs. HLT: -10.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
HLT' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -10.9  Med: -4.1 Max: 16.8
Current: -10.9
-10.9
16.8
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 23.40
HLT's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
70% of the 565 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 6.60 vs. HLT: 23.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
HLT' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 32.6 Max: 51.3
Current: 23.4
0
51.3
GuruFocus has detected 1 Warning Sign with Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc HLT.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» HLT's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2018-10-26)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2017

HLT Guru Trades in Q3 2017

Paul Tudor Jones 70,351 sh (+239.58%)
Ken Heebner 760,000 sh (+15.15%)
Richard Pzena 4,171,275 sh (+0.44%)
Caxton Associates Sold Out
PRIMECAP Management 876,164 sh (-1.02%)
Ron Baron 405,922 sh (-3.55%)
Steven Cohen 143,589 sh (-4.33%)
Joel Greenblatt 441,579 sh (-30.25%)
Pioneer Investments 123,676 sh (-40.81%)
» More
Q4 2017

HLT Guru Trades in Q4 2017

Caxton Associates 12,377 sh (New)
Jim Simons 42,600 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 575,500 sh (+300.80%)
Pioneer Investments 494,777 sh (+300.06%)
Ken Heebner Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
PRIMECAP Management 860,364 sh (-1.80%)
Ron Baron 357,481 sh (-11.93%)
Richard Pzena 2,544,692 sh (-38.99%)
Joel Greenblatt 190,802 sh (-56.79%)
» More
Q1 2018

HLT Guru Trades in Q1 2018

Ken Heebner 580,000 sh (New)
Jim Simons 501,200 sh (+1076.53%)
Caxton Associates 51,699 sh (+317.70%)
Steven Cohen 620,500 sh (+7.82%)
Joel Greenblatt 195,094 sh (+2.25%)
Richard Pzena Sold Out
Pioneer Investments 494,721 sh (-0.01%)
PRIMECAP Management 859,365 sh (-0.12%)
Ron Baron 301,342 sh (-15.70%)
» More
Q2 2018

HLT Guru Trades in Q2 2018

George Soros 190,300 sh (New)
Bill Nygren 1,279,000 sh (New)
Caxton Associates 300,000 sh (+480.28%)
Steven Cohen 3,145,452 sh (+406.92%)
Pioneer Investments 533,609 sh (+7.86%)
PRIMECAP Management 859,365 sh (unchged)
Ken Heebner Sold Out
Ron Baron 299,237 sh (-0.70%)
Jim Simons 393,400 sh (-21.51%)
Joel Greenblatt 54,956 sh (-71.83%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with NYSE:HLT

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
Bill Nygren 2018-06-30 New Buy0.52%$75.01 - $84.68 $ 70.66-13%1,279,000
Ron Baron 2018-06-30 Reduce -0.70%$75.01 - $84.68 $ 70.66-13%299,237
George Soros 2018-06-30 New Buy0.27%$75.01 - $84.68 $ 70.66-13%190,300
Joel Greenblatt 2018-06-30 Reduce -71.83%0.15%$75.01 - $84.68 $ 70.66-13%54,956
Ken Heebner 2018-06-30 Sold Out 2.03%$75.01 - $84.68 $ 70.66-13%0
Ken Heebner 2018-03-31 New Buy2.03%$78.17 - $87.69 $ 70.66-14%580,000
Ron Baron 2018-03-31 Reduce -15.70%0.02%$78.17 - $87.69 $ 70.66-14%301,342
Joel Greenblatt 2018-03-31 Add 2.25%$78.17 - $87.69 $ 70.66-14%195,094
Richard Pzena 2018-03-31 Sold Out 1%$78.17 - $87.69 $ 70.66-14%0
Richard Pzena 2017-12-31 Reduce -38.99%0.6%$68.86 - $80.45 $ 70.66-5%2,544,692
Ron Baron 2017-12-31 Reduce -11.93%0.02%$68.86 - $80.45 $ 70.66-5%357,481
Joel Greenblatt 2017-12-31 Reduce -56.79%0.26%$68.86 - $80.45 $ 70.66-5%190,802
Ken Heebner 2017-12-31 Sold Out 2.31%$68.86 - $80.45 $ 70.66-5%0
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!
Premium More recent guru trades are included for USA Subscribe Members only!!
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Travel & Leisure » Lodging    NAICS: 721110    SIC: 7011
Compare:XPAR:AC, LSE:IHG, NYSE:WYN, SZSE:000069, NYSE:H, SAU:4280, SGX:C09, NAS:HTHT, HKSE:00069, SHSE:600754, NYSE:CHH, SHSE:600258, NYSE:STAY, HKSE:00041, XMCE:MEL, XKRX:008770, OSTO:PNDX B, SGX:M04, XMCE:NHH, SHSE:600138 » details
Traded in other countries:HI91.Germany, HLT.Mexico,
Headquarter Location:USA
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc operates hotels and resorts. The company manages a total or approximately 750,000 rooms across over 10 brands. Some of its brands include Hampton, Hilton, Home2, Curio, Canopy, and Tru.

Hilton is an operator of 856,000 rooms across 14 brands addressing the midscale through luxury segments. Hampton and Hilton are the two largest brands by total room count at around 30% each, while Home2, Curio, Canopy, and Tru represent low single digits of existing rooms but high single digits of the pipeline room base. Managed and franchised represent 90% of adjusted EBITDA. Americas represents 75% of total adjusted EBITDA, while Asia-Pacific is 10%, Europe 12%, and Africa and Middle East is 3%.

Guru Investment Theses on Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc

Bill Nygren Comments on Gartner - Jul 13, 2018

If you were paging through Value Line in February looking for cheap stocks, it would have been easy to skip right past Gartner (NYSE:IT). Value Line says, “Gartner Inc. is the world’s leading information technology research and advisory company…” You would have quickly seen that it is a database-driven, asset-light business that would be expected to command a higher than market P/E ratio. Despite the stock falling from $142 to $119, its P/E was still 31 times expected 2018 earnings and its book value was only $2 per share. Gartner didn’t look like a value stock and, in fact, it was even included in the Russell 1000 Growth Index. But last quarter we bought it for the Oakmark Fund. So, it’s fair to ask: has Oakmark changed, or does Gartner somehow meet our value criteria?



A closer look reveals that Gartner stock fell when management opted to substantially increase selling and marketing expenses to pursue accelerated organic growth, which in turn decreased the company’s reported earnings. The way GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) works, because the future benefit of a marketing expense is uncertain, the cost is immediately expensed. But at a company like Gartner, these marketing expenses could easily be seen as long-term investments in company growth. That’s because a Gartner customer tends to remain with the company for a long time—a little more than six years, on average. So we adjusted the sales and marketing expenses to reflect a six-year life, just like GAAP would treat the purchase of a machine that was expected to last six years. With that one adjustment, Gartner’s expected EPS increased by almost $3. Using our adjusted earnings, which we believe reflect a more realistic view of those intangible assets, Gartner appears to be priced as just an ordinary company. And, as we have said many times, buying an extraordinary company at an ordinary price is value investing at its finest.



From Bill Nygren (Trades, Portfolio)'s market commentary second quarter 2018.

Check out Bill Nygren latest stock trades

Bill Nygren Comments on Hilton Worldwide - Jul 13, 2018

Hilton Worldwide (NYSE:HLT) is a high-quality, well-managed company that was the target of a successful leveraged buyout by Blackstone in 2007. We believe the company’s transformation into an asset-light, fee-driven business with a more resilient earnings profile is underappreciated. After spinning off most of the company’s owned hotels and timeshare businesses early last year, Hilton now generates over 90% of its profits from fees (requiring minimal capital investment) and produces substantial free cash flow (greater than 100% of net income). The company should generate high single-digit operating income growth for several years. We became interested in Hilton after we determined that its competitive moat is widening. The company’s unit growth leads the industry and its global pipeline share is almost 22%—over four times larger than its current share of existing rooms (approximately 5%). We initiated our position at a particularly attractive price due to the temporary pressure created by HNA’s sale of its 26% stake in the company for non-fundamental reasons.



From Bill Nygren (Trades, Portfolio)'s Oakmark Fund second-quarter shareholder letter.

Check out Bill Nygren latest stock trades

Bill Ackman Comments on Hilton Worldwide Holdings - Aug 18, 2017

During the quarter we exited our previously undisclosed passive investment in Hilton Worldwide Holdings (NYSE:HLT) at a 32% profit versus our cost over an 11-month holding period. Our approach to disclosure is to provide to you the information that we would want if our positions were reversed; that is, if you were the investment manager and we were the client, with the caveat that we do not disclose information that would create a competitive disadvantage for the funds unless we are legally required to do so. We did not disclose our investment in Hilton until we disposed of it for this reason.

Hilton is an asset-light, high-margin, fee-based business that primarily franchises and manages hotel properties under more than a dozen hotel brands, including Hilton, Hampton, DoubleTree, and Hilton Garden Inn. Hilton has organically established (i.e., not through acquisition) an industry-leading global pipeline of franchised hotel rooms, which amounts to nearly 40% of its existing room count and should support a high level of capital-light growth for years into the future. Hilton’s extensive and growing network of brands and properties offers a significant and self-reinforcing value proposition to both guests and hotel owners, which creates a strong competitive moat around the business. For guests, Hilton provides a consistent and reliable experience in a variety of destinations at different price points and an attractive loyalty program which features enhanced customer service, amenities, and awards. For hotel owners, Hilton provides access to its more than 60 million loyalty program members, scaled marketing programs, reservation and IT systems, and supply chain purchasing power.

Prior to our investment in the summer of 2016, the company announced it would spin off its owned hotel and timeshare businesses, which we believed would highlight the significant value of its remaining franchised and management business. We have long admired Hilton’s business and had followed its progress since the IPO at the end of 2013. Despite strong business performance since the IPO, which included 15% unit growth, more than 30% EBITDA growth, and more than 70% free cash flow per share growth, Hilton’s share price had increased by a total of only about 10%. We believed that two key investor concerns were weighing on the share price: a potential downturn in the lodging cycle and the potential competitive threat from Airbnb.

To determine the risk of a downturn in the lodging cycle, we undertook an extensive analysis of the previous cycles over the past thirty years. We observed that in the three prior downturns (1991, 2001-2002, and 2008-2009), RevPAR (a measure of same-store sales for the lodging industry) averaged positive annual growth over the five-year period starting just prior to the downturn. While we recognized that it was possible that RevPAR might decline for a period of time, we believed it likely that RevPAR would average positive growth over a three-to-five year time horizon. Moreover, we believed the capital-light unit growth embedded in Hilton’s hotel pipeline would more than offset a potential decline in RevPAR and allow for continued annual revenue and EBITDA growth.

To understand the potential competitive risk regarding Airbnb, we reviewed the publicly available data and research on the company and we interviewed dozens of hotel owners, travel agents, lodging industry consultants, and employees of Airbnb and other vacation-rental competitors. We concluded that Hilton’s business model was unlikely to face a meaningful threat from Airbnb as the two businesses tend to compete for different customer sets. The vast majority of Hilton’s revenue derives from short-stay business travelers who value the consistent experience, amenities, and loyalty program that Hilton’s brands provide, whereas the typical Airbnb customer is a leisure traveler who seeks out unique and local accommodations for a lengthier stay. Furthermore, a large portion of Hilton’s portfolio is based in suburban markets where there is currently limited Airbnb inventory.

In the beginning of 2017, Hilton spun off its owned hotel and timeshare businesses. After the spin, Hilton’s share price began a steady upward ascent as the company continued to report strong business performance and initiated a meaningful share repurchase program. We recently exited our position to allocate capital to other opportunities and achieved a 32% total return on our investment in less than a year. Hilton did not make a more meaningful impact on overall Company performance because its rapid rise at the time of our investment limited the position size to ~5% of the portfolio.

Hilton embodied many of the characteristics that we have identified in other successful investments: a high-quality business with a significant opportunity for capital-light growth, a best-in-class management team, sponsorship from a well-regarded sponsor (Blackstone), and a built-in catalyst, the spinoffs, to unlock shareholder value. While we generally prefer to allocate our capital to activist situations, if we can find a high quality business run by a highly capable management team, and there is appropriate shareholder oversight in the boardroom, we are open to passive investments.

From Bill Ackman (Trades, Portfolio)'s second quarter 2017 shareholder letter.

Check out Bill Ackman latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc

Hilton Hotels in Texas and New Orleans Offer Travelers Savings and Guaranteed Late Checkout for Fall
The Triangle Welcomes First Tru by Hilton
Home2 Suites by Hilton Unveils First Modular Construction Hotel
Bill Nygren Comments on Hilton Worldwide Guru stock highlight
Hilton Worldwide (NYSE:HLT) is a high-quality, well-managed company that was the target of a successful leveraged buyout by Blackstone in 2007. We believe the company’s transformation into an asset-light, fee-driven business with a more resilient earnings profile is underappreciated. After spinning off most of the company’s owned hotels and timeshare businesses early last year, Hilton now generates over 90% of its profits from fees (requiring minimal capital investment) and produces substantial free cash flow (greater than 100% of net income). The company should generate high single-digit operating income growth for several years. We became interested in Hilton after we determined that its competitive moat is widening. The company’s unit growth leads the industry and its global pipeline share is almost 22%—over four times larger than its current share of existing rooms (approximately 5%). We initiated our position at a particularly attractive price due to the temporary pressure created by HNA’s sale of its 26% stake in the company for non-fundamental Read more...
Bill Nygren Comments on Gartner Guru stock highlight
If you were paging through Value Line in February looking for cheap stocks, it would have been easy to skip right past Gartner (NYSE:IT). Value Line says, “Gartner Inc. is the world’s leading information technology research and advisory company…” You would have quickly seen that it is a database-driven, asset-light business that would be expected to command a higher than market P/E ratio. Despite the stock falling from $142 to $119, its P/E was still 31 times expected 2018 earnings and its book value was only $2 per share. Gartner didn’t look like a value stock and, in fact, it was even included in the Russell 1000 Growth Index. But last quarter we bought it for the Oakmark Fund. So, it’s fair to ask: has Oakmark changed, or does Gartner somehow meet our value criteria?
Read more...
Homewood Suites by Hilton Raleigh Cary I-40 Opens
Richard Pzena Exits Hilton, Cuts Cigna, Walmart Guru's largest sales of the first quarter
Richard Pzena (Trades, Portfolio) sold shares in the following stocks during the first quarter. Read more...
All Suites Brands by Hilton Enter 2018 with 900 Hotels After Record Year
Embassy Suites by Hilton Cooks Up New Dining Options
Can Hotel Companies Survive Airbnb? This One Will Airbnb, Expedia, TripAdvisor, Priceline and the rest of the alternative lodging purveyors may pose a threat to some hotels and hotel companies. But not all...
I published an article/novella on GuruFocus as Part I of a series on the lodging industry, Hot Hotel Stocks? Look Before You Leap. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 16.28
HLT's PE Ratio is ranked higher than
61% of the 620 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 20.77 vs. HLT: 16.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
HLT' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.8  Med: 27.1 Max: 99999999.99
Current: 16.28
8.8
99999999.99
Forward PE Ratio 22.37
HLT's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
83% of the 151 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 18.05 vs. HLT: 22.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 16.28
HLT's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked higher than
61% of the 619 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 20.83 vs. HLT: 16.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
HLT' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.15  Med: 23.97 Max: 35.44
Current: 16.28
14.15
35.44
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 31.16
HLT's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked lower than
70% of the 399 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 19.32 vs. HLT: 31.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
HLT' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 17.87  Med: 35.83 Max: 65.73
Current: 31.16
17.87
65.73
PB Ratio 38.01
HLT's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
99% of the 789 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 1.77 vs. HLT: 38.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
HLT' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.05  Med: 3.65 Max: 45.26
Current: 38.01
2.05
45.26
PS Ratio 2.49
HLT's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
63% of the 810 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 1.89 vs. HLT: 2.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
HLT' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.43  Med: 2.46 Max: 4.15
Current: 2.49
1.43
4.15
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 23.37
HLT's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
62% of the 377 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 17.89 vs. HLT: 23.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
HLT' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.41  Med: 18.35 Max: 36.16
Current: 23.37
8.41
36.16
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 20.17
HLT's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
76% of the 531 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 12.12 vs. HLT: 20.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
HLT' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.1  Med: 13.56 Max: 30.96
Current: 20.17
7.1
30.96
EV-to-EBIT 19.52
HLT's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
62% of the 644 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 16.60 vs. HLT: 19.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
HLT' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.9  Med: 22.55 Max: 27228.8
Current: 19.52
12.9
27228.8
EV-to-EBITDA 15.81
HLT's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
67% of the 690 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 12.32 vs. HLT: 15.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
HLT' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.7  Med: 15.65 Max: 39.9
Current: 15.81
9.7
39.9
EV-to-Revenue 3.14
HLT's EV-to-Revenue is ranked lower than
64% of the 805 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 2.33 vs. HLT: 3.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
HLT' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.3  Med: 3.3 Max: 6.4
Current: 3.14
2.3
6.4
Current Ratio 0.78
HLT's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
79% of the 819 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 1.39 vs. HLT: 0.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
HLT' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.78  Med: 1.1 Max: 1.37
Current: 0.78
0.78
1.37
Quick Ratio 0.78
HLT's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
72% of the 819 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 1.20 vs. HLT: 0.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
HLT' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.78  Med: 0.94 Max: 1.33
Current: 0.78
0.78
1.33
Days Sales Outstanding 42.23
HLT's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
62% of the 778 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 30.64 vs. HLT: 42.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
HLT' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 30.79  Med: 33.78 Max: 51.43
Current: 42.23
30.79
51.43

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 0.85
HLT's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
86% of the 873 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 2.15 vs. HLT: 0.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
HLT' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.39  Med: 1.07 Max: 1.88
Current: 0.85
0.39
1.88
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.13
HLT's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked higher than
86% of the 488 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 0.40 vs. HLT: 0.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
HLT' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.13  Med: 0.16 Max: 0.79
Current: 0.13
0.13
0.79
Forward Dividend Yield % 0.85
HLT's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
89% of the 850 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 2.37 vs. HLT: 0.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 0.84
HLT's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
88% of the 864 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 2.67 vs. HLT: 0.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
HLT' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.39  Med: 1.07 Max: 1.88
Current: 0.84
0.39
1.88
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 1.10
HLT's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
88% of the 452 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: -2.90 vs. HLT: 1.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
HLT' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.3  Med: -0.1 Max: 1.1
Current: 1.1
-2.3
1.1

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 2.13
HLT's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
70% of the 433 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 1.42 vs. HLT: 2.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
HLT' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.13  Med: 2.39 Max: 2.46
Current: 2.13
2.13
2.46
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.02
HLT's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
58% of the 713 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 1.01 vs. HLT: 1.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
HLT' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.58  Med: 1.02 Max: 1.53
Current: 1.02
0.58
1.53
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 5.12
HLT's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
52% of the 825 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 4.69 vs. HLT: 5.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
HLT' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.6  Med: 4.5 Max: 7.7
Current: 5.12
1.6
7.7
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -3.58
HLT's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
76% of the 483 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 7.83 vs. HLT: -3.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
HLT' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.4  Med: -3.7 Max: -1.2
Current: -3.58
-4.4
-1.2

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $8,998.00
EPS (TTM) $ 4.34
Beta1.38
Volatility13.89%
52-Week Range $70.33 - 88.11
Shares Outstanding (Mil)298.19

Analyst Estimate

Dec18 Dec19 Dec20
Revenue (Mil $) 5,611 6,054 4,043
EBIT (Mil $) 1,660 1,801 2,014
EBITDA (Mil $) 2,023 2,179 2,261
EPS ($) 2.66 3.19 3.73
EPS without NRI ($) 2.66 3.19 3.73
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
7.14%
Dividends per Share ($) 0.63 0.71 0.68

Piotroski F-Score Details

Piotroski F-Score: 66
Positive ROAY
Positive CFROAY
Higher ROA yoyY
CFROA > ROAN
Lower Leverage yoyN
Higher Current Ratio yoyN
Less Shares Outstanding yoyY
Higher Gross Margin yoyY
Higher Asset Turnover yoyY

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}