Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt No Debt
MN's Cash-to-Debt is ranked higher than
54% of the 973 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 85.28 vs. MN: No Debt )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
MN' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 100.81  Med: No Debt Max: No Debt
Current: No Debt
100.81
No Debt
Equity-to-Asset 0.79
MN's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
57% of the 841 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.76 vs. MN: 0.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
MN' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.79  Med: 0.73 Max: 0.9
Current: 0.79
-2.79
0.9
Interest Coverage 622.85
MN's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
56% of the 762 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. MN: 622.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
MN' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.88  Med: 918 Max: 4981.22
Current: 622.85
1.88
4981.22
Piotroski F-Score: 5
Altman Z-Score: 2.57
Beneish M-Score: -3.96
WACC vs ROIC
9.71%
-720.99%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 18.91
MN's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
57% of the 690 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 26.45 vs. MN: 18.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
MN' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -17.81  Med: 33.88 Max: 44.99
Current: 18.91
-17.81
44.99
Net Margin % 1.12
MN's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
78% of the 852 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 26.39 vs. MN: 1.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
MN' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -8.23  Med: 2.07 Max: 33.46
Current: 1.12
-8.23
33.46
ROE % 1.25
MN's ROE % is ranked lower than
68% of the 959 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 6.19 vs. MN: 1.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
MN' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -314.11  Med: 2.18 Max: 7.43
Current: 1.25
-314.11
7.43
ROA % 0.96
MN's ROA % is ranked lower than
65% of the 978 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.04 vs. MN: 0.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
MN' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -21.98  Med: 2.67 Max: 101.98
Current: 0.96
-21.98
101.98
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 886.24
MN's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
80% of the 658 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 66.11 vs. MN: 886.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
MN' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1692.04  Med: 1772.65 Max: 3745.13
Current: 886.24
-1692.04
3745.13
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -20.90
MN's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
81% of the 703 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.10 vs. MN: -20.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
MN' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -20.9  Med: 0.4 Max: 24.3
Current: -20.9
-20.9
24.3
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -21.20
MN's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
82% of the 507 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 5.80 vs. MN: -21.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
MN' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -5.3 Max: 11.9
Current: -21.2
0
11.9
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -27.70
MN's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
83% of the 628 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 6.40 vs. MN: -27.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
MN' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -13.85 Max: 71
Current: -27.7
0
71
GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with Manning & Napier Inc MN.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» MN's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2018-10-26 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2017

MN Guru Trades in Q3 2017

HOTCHKIS & WILEY 24,113 sh (New)
John Rogers 1,099,079 sh (+1.92%)
Chuck Royce 535,042 sh (+0.52%)
Paul Tudor Jones 12,147 sh (unchged)
Charles Brandes Sold Out
Jim Simons 1,209,300 sh (-4.45%)
David Rolfe 41,000 sh (-26.79%)
» More
Q4 2017

MN Guru Trades in Q4 2017

HOTCHKIS & WILEY 113,683 sh (+371.46%)
Jim Simons 1,214,191 sh (+0.40%)
Paul Tudor Jones 12,147 sh (unchged)
Chuck Royce 532,292 sh (-0.51%)
John Rogers 963,858 sh (-12.30%)
David Rolfe 23,500 sh (-42.68%)
» More
Q1 2018

MN Guru Trades in Q1 2018

David Rolfe 27,321 sh (+16.26%)
John Rogers 1,017,878 sh (+5.60%)
Paul Tudor Jones 12,147 sh (unchged)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 113,683 sh (unchged)
Chuck Royce 532,292 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons 1,202,800 sh (-0.94%)
» More
Q2 2018

MN Guru Trades in Q2 2018

Chuck Royce 532,292 sh (unchged)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY Sold Out
John Rogers 992,478 sh (-2.50%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with NYSE:MN

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
John Rogers 2018-06-30 Reduce -2.50%$3 - $3.7 $ 2.65-18%992,478
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 2018-06-30 Sold Out $3 - $3.7 $ 2.65-18%0
John Rogers 2018-03-31 Add 5.60%$3 - $4.2 $ 2.65-26%1,017,878
John Rogers 2017-12-31 Reduce -12.30%0.01%$3.4 - $4.05 $ 2.65-30%963,858
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 2017-12-31 Add 371.46%$3.4 - $4.05 $ 2.65-30%113,683
John Rogers 2017-09-30 Add 1.92%$3.05 - $4.5 $ 2.65-31%1,099,079
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 2017-09-30 New Buy$3.05 - $4.5 $ 2.65-31%24,113
Charles Brandes 2017-09-30 Sold Out $3.05 - $4.5 $ 2.65-31%0
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!
Premium More recent guru trades are included for USA Subscribe Members only!!
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Asset Management » Asset Management    NAICS: 523910    SIC: 6282
Compare:TSXV:NFD.A, TSE:7162, COL:GUAR.N0000, WAR:KZS, TSXV:M, LSE:MIL, ASX:AYZ, ASX:CAF, TSE:3266, LSE:VLE, WAR:MDI, TSX:PFT.UN, HKSE:01217, LSE:FIPP, JSE:ECS, OCSE:SPEAS, SGX:CHJ, XCNQ:BLOC, HKSE:08025, NAS:GROW » details
Traded in other countries:MN0.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Manning & Napier Inc is an independent investment management firm. It provides investment management services through separately managed accounts, mutual funds, and collective investment trust funds, as well as a variety of consultative services.

Manning & Napier Inc is an independent investment management firm. It provides investment management services through separately managed accounts, mutual funds, and collective investment trust funds, as well as a variety of consultative services. It also offers equity, fixed income, and alternative strategies, as well as a range of blended asset portfolios, such as life cycle funds. The company offers its investment management capabilities primarily through direct sales to high net worth individuals and institutions, as well as through third-party intermediaries, platforms, and institutional investment consultants.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 132.50
MN's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
96% of the 723 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 14.21 vs. MN: 132.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
MN' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 32.72  Med: 76.57 Max: 803.91
Current: 132.5
32.72
803.91
PE Ratio without NRI 132.50
MN's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
96% of the 718 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 14.25 vs. MN: 132.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
MN' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 32.72  Med: 76.57 Max: 803.91
Current: 132.5
32.72
803.91
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 10.99
MN's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked lower than
93% of the 316 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 13.08 vs. MN: 10.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
MN' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.74  Med: 48.17 Max: 83.21
Current: 10.99
8.74
83.21
PB Ratio 0.25
MN's PB Ratio is ranked higher than
96% of the 949 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.04 vs. MN: 0.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
MN' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.25  Med: 5.45 Max: 9.14
Current: 0.25
0.25
9.14
PS Ratio 1.50
MN's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
81% of the 773 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 4.55 vs. MN: 1.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
MN' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.16  Med: 2.52 Max: 4.41
Current: 1.5
1.16
4.41
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 5.75
MN's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
83% of the 269 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 13.02 vs. MN: 5.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
MN' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.49  Med: 6.24 Max: 10.12
Current: 5.75
3.49
10.12
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 5.51
MN's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
78% of the 456 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 11.64 vs. MN: 5.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
MN' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.47  Med: 6.15 Max: 10.02
Current: 5.51
3.47
10.02
EV-to-EBIT -2.56
MN's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 556 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 11.96 vs. MN: -2.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
MN' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -16.7  Med: 4.5 Max: 25.4
Current: -2.56
-16.7
25.4
EV-to-EBITDA -2.48
MN's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 567 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 11.05 vs. MN: -2.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
MN' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -17.1  Med: 4.4 Max: 24.6
Current: -2.48
-17.1
24.6
EV-to-Revenue -0.69
MN's EV-to-Revenue is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 737 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 5.44 vs. MN: -0.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
MN' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.3  Med: 2.2 Max: 7.8
Current: -0.69
0.3
7.8
Current Ratio 4.37
MN's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
54% of the 750 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.98 vs. MN: 4.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
MN' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.51  Med: 3.27 Max: 4.85
Current: 4.37
1.51
4.85
Quick Ratio 4.37
MN's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
55% of the 751 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.62 vs. MN: 4.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
MN' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.51  Med: 3.27 Max: 4.85
Current: 4.37
1.51
4.85
Days Sales Outstanding 26.40
MN's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
61% of the 469 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 41.14 vs. MN: 26.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
MN' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 26.4  Med: 36.12 Max: 47.96
Current: 26.4
26.4
47.96
Days Payable 17.20
MN's Days Payable is ranked lower than
75% of the 293 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 53.45 vs. MN: 17.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
MN' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 17.2
Current: 17.2
0
17.2

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 12.08
MN's Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
93% of the 1130 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 7.22 vs. MN: 12.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
MN' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.11  Med: 6.15 Max: 16.72
Current: 12.08
1.11
16.72
Dividend Payout Ratio 2.46
MN's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked lower than
88% of the 618 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.56 vs. MN: 2.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
MN' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.68  Med: 7.35 Max: 18.82
Current: 2.46
1.68
18.82
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate -14.50
MN's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked lower than
75% of the 378 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 5.20 vs. MN: -14.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
MN' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 10.1
Current: -14.5
0
10.1
Forward Dividend Yield % 12.08
MN's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
92% of the 1041 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 4.37 vs. MN: 12.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 10.59
MN's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked higher than
84% of the 1124 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 4.60 vs. MN: 10.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
MN' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.97  Med: 5.39 Max: 14.66
Current: 10.59
0.97
14.66
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -3.10
MN's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
59% of the 587 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: -1.30 vs. MN: -3.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
MN' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.2  Med: -2.85 Max: -0.3
Current: -3.1
-3.2
-0.3

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Net-Cash 0.47
MN's Price-to-Net-Cash is ranked higher than
95% of the 375 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.82 vs. MN: 0.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Cash only.
MN' s Price-to-Net-Cash Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 25.27 Max: 367.5
Current: 0.47
0
367.5
Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value 0.39
MN's Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value is ranked higher than
95% of the 442 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 2.99 vs. MN: 0.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value only.
MN' s Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 12.2 Max: 27.76
Current: 0.39
0
27.76
Price-to-Tangible-Book 0.26
MN's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked higher than
96% of the 890 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.07 vs. MN: 0.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
MN' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.26  Med: 5.76 Max: 8.16
Current: 0.26
0.26
8.16
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 0.18
MN's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
58% of the 315 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.06 vs. MN: 0.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
MN' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.34 Max: 1.2
Current: 0.18
0
1.2
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.59
MN's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
84% of the 610 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.99 vs. MN: 0.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
MN' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 1.07 Max: 1.51
Current: 0.59
0
1.51
Price-to-Graham-Number 1.21
MN's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked lower than
54% of the 576 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.92 vs. MN: 1.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
MN' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 3.53 Max: 15.72
Current: 1.21
0
15.72
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % -39.06
MN's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
94% of the 841 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 4.43 vs. MN: -39.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
MN' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -39.06  Med: 15.7 Max: 92.3
Current: -39.06
-39.06
92.3
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 44.10
MN's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
98% of the 289 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 8.62 vs. MN: 44.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
MN' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 35.5  Med: 41.35 Max: 51.3
Current: 44.1
35.5
51.3

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $177.85
EPS (TTM) $ 0.02
Beta1.13
Volatility37.75%
52-Week Range $2.57 - 4.35
Shares Outstanding (Mil)86.12

Piotroski F-Score Details

Piotroski F-Score: 55
Positive ROAY
Positive CFROAY
Higher ROA yoyN
CFROA > ROAY
Lower Leverage yoyY
Higher Current Ratio yoyY
Less Shares Outstanding yoyN
Higher Gross Margin yoyN
Higher Asset Turnover yoyN

» More Articles for MN

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}