Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt No Debt
NYSE:NMBL's Cash-to-Debt is ranked higher than
88% of the 2289 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 1.44 vs. NYSE:NMBL: No Debt )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
NYSE:NMBL' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: No Debt  Med: No Debt Max: No Debt
Current: No Debt
Equity-to-Asset 0.32
NYSE:NMBL's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
86% of the 2257 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 0.57 vs. NYSE:NMBL: 0.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
NYSE:NMBL' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.8  Med: 0.4 Max: 0.74
Current: 0.32
-0.8
0.74
Interest Coverage No Debt
NYSE:NMBL's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
85% of the 1868 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 56.05 vs. NYSE:NMBL: No Debt )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NYSE:NMBL' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: No Debt  Med: No Debt Max: No Debt
Current: No Debt
Piotroski F-Score: 3
Altman Z-Score: 1.17
Beneish M-Score: -3.85
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % -38.90
NYSE:NMBL's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
94% of the 2270 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 4.35 vs. NYSE:NMBL: -38.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
NYSE:NMBL' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -406.13  Med: -42.2 Max: -33.86
Current: -38.9
-406.13
-33.86
Net Margin % -39.32
NYSE:NMBL's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
93% of the 2269 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 3.34 vs. NYSE:NMBL: -39.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
NYSE:NMBL' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -405.83  Med: -43.42 Max: -34.3
Current: -39.32
-405.83
-34.3
ROE % -122.14
NYSE:NMBL's ROE % is ranked lower than
98% of the 2240 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 6.43 vs. NYSE:NMBL: -122.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
NYSE:NMBL' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -122.14  Med: -68.31 Max: -54.88
Current: -122.14
-122.14
-54.88
ROA % -48.51
NYSE:NMBL's ROA % is ranked lower than
97% of the 2298 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 3.17 vs. NYSE:NMBL: -48.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NYSE:NMBL' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -89.74  Med: -42.78 Max: -26.01
Current: -48.51
-89.74
-26.01
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % -311.33
NYSE:NMBL's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
97% of the 2289 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 11.99 vs. NYSE:NMBL: -311.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NYSE:NMBL' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1515.07  Med: -344.18 Max: -282.06
Current: -311.33
-1515.07
-282.06
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 0.10
NYSE:NMBL's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
56% of the 2115 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 1.80 vs. NYSE:NMBL: 0.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
NYSE:NMBL' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 5.75 Max: 53.9
Current: 0.1
0
53.9
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 3.00
NYSE:NMBL's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
55% of the 1821 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 6.30 vs. NYSE:NMBL: 3.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
NYSE:NMBL' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -0.35 Max: 5.7
Current: 3
0
5.7
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 4.70
NYSE:NMBL's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
50% of the 1692 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 4.60 vs. NYSE:NMBL: 4.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
NYSE:NMBL' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 2.25 Max: 9.6
Current: 4.7
0
9.6
GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Signs with Nimble Storage Inc $NYSE:NMBL.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NYSE:NMBL's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-11-22 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2016

NMBL Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Jim Simons 4,580,300 sh (+58.91%)
Chuck Royce 68,000 sh (+58.14%)
PRIMECAP Management 362,500 sh (+19.80%)
» More
Q4 2016

NMBL Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Paul Tudor Jones 16,008 sh (New)
Chuck Royce 690,491 sh (+915.43%)
PRIMECAP Management 430,400 sh (+18.73%)
Jim Simons 4,433,700 sh (-3.20%)
» More
Q1 2017

NMBL Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Mario Gabelli 237,075 sh (New)
Leucadia National 300,000 sh (New)
PRIMECAP Management 575,400 sh (+33.69%)
Jim Simons 5,403,300 sh (+21.87%)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Chuck Royce Sold Out
» More
Q2 2017

NMBL Guru Trades in Q2 2017

Jim Simons Sold Out
PRIMECAP Management Sold Out
Leucadia National Sold Out
Mario Gabelli Sold Out
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with NYSE:NMBL

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
Mario Gabelli 2017-06-30 Sold Out 0.02%$12.48 - $12.5 $ 12.490%0
Leucadia National 2017-06-30 Sold Out 0.31%$12.48 - $12.5 $ 12.490%0
Leucadia National 2017-03-31 New Buy0.31%$7.84 - $12.58 $ 12.4928%300,000
Mario Gabelli 2017-03-31 New Buy0.02%$7.84 - $12.58 $ 12.4928%237,075
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!
Premium More recent guru trades are included for USA Subscribe Members only!!
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Computer Hardware » Data Storage    NAICS: 518210    SIC: 7374
Compare:NAS:GDS, TPE:2451, ASX:NXT, SZSE:300042, ROCO:6188, TPE:2349, OSL:THIN, TPE:2323, TPE:4977, NYSE:QTM, XKRX:005070, TPE:8215, TSE:6834, TPE:2495, TPE:6145, TSE:6916, ROCO:6179, TPE:3054, ROCO:3217, TPE:3057 » details
Traded in other countries:NLE.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Nimble Storage Inc designs & sells a flash-optimized hybrid storage platform that it believes is disrupting the market by enabling improvements in application performance and storage capacity with data protection.

Nimble Storage Inc was incorporated in the state of Delaware in November 2007. The Company designs and sells a flash-optimized storage platform; comprised of a Unified Flash Fabric that provides single consolidation architecture with common data services across a portfolio of All Flash and Adaptive Flash arrays and InfoSight predictive analytics with integrated support and service offerings. It enables IT organizations to optimize performance, capacity and cost for all applications running across the data center and maintain a 99.9997% measured uptime with InfoSight cloud-based management software. Adaptive Flash that it believes is disrupting the market by enabling improvements in application performance and storage capacity with superior data protection, while simplifying business operations and lowering costs. With the combination of the Company's file system, CASL, and its cloud-based storage management and support service, InfoSight, the Company's platform serves a broad array of enterprises and cloud-based service providers, and the Company's software and storage systems effectively handle mainstream applications, including virtual desktops, databases, email, collaboration and analytics. Its storage systems are optimized for the mainstream IT applications used by mid-sized enterprises, large enterprises and cloud-based service providers. The Company offers a CS-Series of systems with a range of capacities and processing power. Its systems provide adaptive performance for high-I/O applications and high-capacity environments, including Exchange, Oracle, SharePoint, SQL Server, virtual desktop infrastructure, or VDI, and server virtualization. The Company packages its CASL file system software with all of its systems and offer InfoSight as a service to all its customers. Its products include CS210, CS215, CS300, CS500, CS700, ES-1 Expansion Shelves and All-Flash Shelf. Its contract manufacturer generally procures the components used in its products directly from third-party suppliers. Its marketing strategies include product marketing, programs marketing, field marketing, channel marketing, and public relations functions. Marketing activities include demand generation, advertising, managing its partner portal, trade shows and conferences, press and analyst relations, and customer awareness. The Company competes to a lesser extent with a number of other smaller companies and certain well-established companies. Its competitors fall into two categories which includes large storage system vendors such as EMC and NetApp that offer a broad portfolio of storage systems targeting varied use cases and end markets; and large systems companies such as Dell and HP that have acquired specialist storage vendors in recent years to complement their internally-developed storage offerings and have the technical and financial resources to bring competitive products to the market. The Company have registered the trademark Nimble Storage in the Un

Top Ranked Articles about Nimble Storage Inc

9 Stocks Primecap Management Continues to Buy Holdings the firm boosted during last 2 quarters
PRIMECAP Management (Trades, Portfolio) was founded in September 1983 in Pasadena, California, by Chairman and Chief Investment Officer Howard B. Schow, Vice Chairman Mitchell J. Milias and President Theo A. Kolokotrones. It manages Vanguard’s PRIMECAP Fund, Vanguard Capital Opportunity Fund and Vanguard PRIMECAP Core Fund. In both first-quarter 2017 and fourth-quarter 2016 the guru bought shares in the following stocks: Read more...
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Announces Dividend Forward dividend yield of 1.45%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. (NYSE:HPE) has announced a quarterly dividend of 6.5 cents with an ex-dividend date of June 12. The stock is currently trading at $18.09 with a forward dividend yield of 1.45%. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PB Ratio 10.37
NMBL's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
97% of the 2229 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 1.84 vs. NMBL: 10.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
NMBL' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.09  Med: 10.44 Max: 19.71
Current: 10.37
3.09
19.71
PS Ratio 2.64
NMBL's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
73% of the 2236 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 1.12 vs. NMBL: 2.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
NMBL' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.43  Med: 5.67 Max: 9.36
Current: 2.64
1.43
9.36
EV-to-EBIT -6.15
NMBL's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 1748 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 16.50 vs. NMBL: -6.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
NMBL' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -43.8  Med: -15.3 Max: -2.1
Current: -6.15
-43.8
-2.1
EV-to-EBITDA -7.19
NMBL's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 1855 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 11.95 vs. NMBL: -7.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
NMBL' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -48.7  Med: -17.1 Max: -2.4
Current: -7.19
-48.7
-2.4
EV-to-Revenue 2.39
NMBL's EV-to-Revenue is ranked lower than
70% of the 2229 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 1.12 vs. NMBL: 2.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
NMBL' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.8  Med: 6.1 Max: 15.5
Current: 2.39
0.8
15.5
Current Ratio 1.92
NMBL's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
51% of the 2222 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 1.95 vs. NMBL: 1.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
NMBL' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.92  Med: 3.31 Max: 6.02
Current: 1.92
1.92
6.02
Quick Ratio 1.77
NMBL's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
62% of the 2222 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 1.44 vs. NMBL: 1.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
NMBL' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.77  Med: 3.13 Max: 5.89
Current: 1.77
1.77
5.89
Days Inventory 46.08
NMBL's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
75% of the 2208 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 72.25 vs. NMBL: 46.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
NMBL' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 40.2  Med: 46.44 Max: 54.4
Current: 46.08
40.2
54.4
Days Sales Outstanding 58.33
NMBL's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
68% of the 1906 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 74.46 vs. NMBL: 58.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
NMBL' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 51.31  Med: 57.73 Max: 118.2
Current: 58.33
51.31
118.2
Days Payable 82.72
NMBL's Days Payable is ranked higher than
69% of the 1836 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 60.11 vs. NMBL: 82.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
NMBL' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 75.07  Med: 87.13 Max: 124.94
Current: 82.72
75.07
124.94

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -7.40
NMBL's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
68% of the 1446 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: -2.80 vs. NMBL: -7.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
NMBL' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -67.5  Med: -36.25 Max: 0
Current: -7.4
-67.5
0

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value 20.48
NMBL's Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value is ranked lower than
90% of the 1662 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 4.25 vs. NMBL: 20.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value only.
NMBL' s Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.02  Med: 13.74 Max: 20.48
Current: 20.48
5.02
20.48
Price-to-Tangible-Book 10.50
NMBL's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
93% of the 2179 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 2.00 vs. NMBL: 10.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
NMBL' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.47  Med: 8.66 Max: 16.15
Current: 10.5
3.47
16.15
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.47
NMBL's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
96% of the 2022 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 1.17 vs. NMBL: 0.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
NMBL' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.28  Med: 0.79 Max: 1.35
Current: 0.47
0.28
1.35
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % -16.26
NMBL's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
92% of the 2295 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 4.04 vs. NMBL: -16.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
NMBL' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -47.2  Med: -6.5 Max: -2.3
Current: -16.26
-47.2
-2.3

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $402.60
EPS (TTM) $ -1.84
Short Percentage of Float3.66%
52-Week Range $6.18 - 12.58
Shares Outstanding (Mil)91.90

Analyst Estimate

Jan18 Jan19
Revenue (Mil $) 479 561
EPS ($) -0.40 -0.18
EPS without NRI ($) -0.40 -0.18
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
22.00%
Dividends per Share ($)

Piotroski F-Score Details

Piotroski F-Score: 33
Positive ROAN
Positive CFROAN
Higher ROA yoyN
CFROA > ROAY
Lower Leverage yoyY
Higher Current Ratio yoyN
Less Shares Outstanding yoyN
Higher Gross Margin yoyN
Higher Asset Turnover yoyY

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}