Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany, Switzerland, UK

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.01
PCG's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
96% of the 619 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 0.26 vs. PCG: 0.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
PCG' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.04 Max: 1.1
Current: 0.01
0
1.1
Equity-to-Asset 0.27
PCG's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
70% of the 632 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 0.36 vs. PCG: 0.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
PCG' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.05  Med: 0.25 Max: 0.35
Current: 0.27
0.05
0.35
Debt-to-Equity 0.99
PCG's Debt-to-Equity is ranked lower than
52% of the 562 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 0.95 vs. PCG: 0.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-Equity only.
PCG' s Debt-to-Equity Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.78  Med: 1.05 Max: 4.81
Current: 0.99
0.78
4.81
Debt-to-EBITDA 2.99
PCG's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
60% of the 561 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 3.62 vs. PCG: 2.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-EBITDA only.
PCG' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.95  Med: 3.23 Max: 4.03
Current: 2.99
1.95
4.03
Interest Coverage 3.84
PCG's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
60% of the 604 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 5.00 vs. PCG: 3.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
PCG' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.95  Med: 2.77 Max: 3.84
Current: 3.84
1.95
3.84
Piotroski F-Score: 7
Altman Z-Score: 0.85
WACC vs ROIC
3.32%
7.45%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 18.34
PCG's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
62% of the 638 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 13.25 vs. PCG: 18.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
PCG' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.96  Med: 13.66 Max: 18.34
Current: 18.34
8.96
18.34
Net Margin % 11.51
PCG's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
67% of the 637 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 7.32 vs. PCG: 11.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
PCG' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.28  Med: 7.78 Max: 11.51
Current: 11.51
5.28
11.51
ROE % 11.58
PCG's ROE % is ranked higher than
67% of the 633 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 8.35 vs. PCG: 11.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
PCG' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.41  Med: 8.81 Max: 14.92
Current: 11.58
5.41
14.92
ROA % 3.05
PCG's ROA % is ranked higher than
52% of the 649 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 2.95 vs. PCG: 3.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
PCG' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.44  Med: 2.32 Max: 3.49
Current: 3.05
1.44
3.49
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 6.68
PCG's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
70% of the 649 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 9.68 vs. PCG: 6.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
PCG' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.55  Med: 5.97 Max: 10.15
Current: 6.68
3.55
10.15
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 0.20
PCG's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
51% of the 592 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 0.40 vs. PCG: 0.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
PCG' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -21.1  Med: 0.2 Max: 34.1
Current: 0.2
-21.1
34.1
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 4.90
PCG's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
51% of the 552 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 5.10 vs. PCG: 4.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
PCG' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -3.1 Max: 24.1
Current: 4.9
0
24.1
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 15.00
PCG's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
70% of the 516 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 3.80 vs. PCG: 15.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
PCG' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -32.3  Med: 3.4 Max: 47.4
Current: 15
-32.3
47.4
GuruFocus has detected 2 Warning Signs with PG&E Corp $PCG.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» PCG's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-11-02)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2016

PCG Guru Trades in Q3 2016

T Rowe Price Equity Income Fund 4,625,000 sh (+3.93%)
Ken Fisher 3,410 sh (+1.76%)
Richard Pzena 312,782 sh (+0.07%)
John Hussman 1,000 sh (unchged)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Jim Simons 559,500 sh (-24.10%)
Steven Cohen 265,300 sh (-30.11%)
» More
Q4 2016

PCG Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Jim Simons 1,220,600 sh (+118.16%)
T Rowe Price Equity Income Fund 4,625,000 sh (unchged)
John Hussman 1,000 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Richard Pzena 312,690 sh (-0.03%)
Ken Fisher 3,351 sh (-1.73%)
» More
Q1 2017

PCG Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Paul Tudor Jones 22,950 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 9,833 sh (New)
Jim Simons 1,343,700 sh (+10.09%)
T Rowe Price Equity Income Fund 4,630,000 sh (+0.11%)
Richard Pzena 313,010 sh (+0.10%)
John Hussman 1,000 sh (unchged)
Ken Fisher 3,351 sh (unchged)
» More
Q2 2017

PCG Guru Trades in Q2 2017

Paul Tudor Jones 38,078 sh (+65.92%)
Jim Simons 1,715,400 sh (+27.66%)
Ken Fisher 3,477 sh (+3.76%)
John Hussman 1,000 sh (unchged)
Richard Pzena 313,010 sh (unchged)
T Rowe Price Equity Income Fund 4,414,400 sh (-4.66%)
Joel Greenblatt 5,635 sh (-42.69%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with NYSE:PCG

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
T Rowe Price Equity Income Fund 2017-09-30 Reduce -6.56%0.09%$65.04 - $71.56 $ 57.44-16%4,125,000
T Rowe Price Equity Income Fund 2017-06-30 Reduce -4.66%0.07%$65.33 - $69.22 $ 57.44-15%4,414,400
Joel Greenblatt 2017-06-30 Reduce -42.69%$65.33 - $69.22 $ 57.44-15%5,635
Ken Fisher 2017-06-30 Add 3.76%$65.33 - $69.22 $ 57.44-15%3,477
T Rowe Price Equity Income Fund 2017-03-31 Add 0.11%$60.07 - $67.86 $ 57.44-10%4,630,000
Richard Pzena 2017-03-31 Add 0.10%$60.07 - $67.86 $ 57.44-10%313,010
Joel Greenblatt 2017-03-31 New Buy0.01%$60.07 - $67.86 $ 57.44-10%9,833
Richard Pzena 2016-12-31 Reduce -0.03%$58.04 - $62.12 $ 57.44-4%312,690
Ken Fisher 2016-12-31 Reduce -1.73%$58.04 - $62.12 $ 57.44-4%3,351
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!
Premium More recent guru trades are included for USA Subscribe Members only!!
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Utilities - Regulated » Utilities - Regulated Electric    NAICS: 221210    SIC: 4922
Compare:NYSE:AEP, SAU:5110, NYSE:PPL, HKSE:00002, NYSE:EIX, XTER:IGY, NYSE:ED, XMCE:ELE, NYSE:XEL, NYSE:KEP, NYSE:SO, NYSE:WEC, NYSE:DTE, NYSE:ES, OTCPK:TNABY, BOM:532898, TSX:FTS, NYSE:AGR, NYSE:AEE, NYSE:CMS » details
Traded in other countries:PCG.Germany, PCG.Switzerland, 0QR3.UK,
Headquarter Location:USA
PG&E Corp is an electric utility company that provides electricity as well as natural gas distribution, electricity generation, procurement, and transmission, and natural gas procurement, transportation, and storage.

PG&E is a holding company whose main subsidiary is Pacific Gas and Electric, a regulated utility operating in Central and Northern California that serves 5.3 million electricity customers and 4.4 million gas customers in 47 of the state's 58 counties. In 2004, PG&E sold its unregulated assets as part of its postbankruptcy reorganization.

Top Ranked Articles about PG&E Corp

PG&E Corporation Schedules Third Quarter 2017 Earnings Release and Conference Call
Weekly Top Insider Buys Highlights Largest buys were PG&E, Freeport-McMoRan, Coty, Annaly Capital Management
The largest insider buys last week were for PG&E Corp. (NYSE:PCG), Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (NYSE:FCX), Coty Inc. (NYSE:COTY) and Annaly Capital Management Inc. (NYSE:NLY). Read more...
5 Companies Reach 52-Week Highs Synopsys, PG&E, Agilent, Procter & Gamble, McDonald's prices climb
According to GuruFocus' list, these stocks have reached their 52-week highs. Read more...
PG&E Corporation Schedules First Quarter 2017 Earnings Release and Conference Call
Black & Veatch and AMSC to Study Application of Resilient Electric Grid System on Pacific Gas & Electric Company’s Grid

Black & Veatch Awarded Study of Options to Improve Resiliency of PG&E’s Grid

DEVENS, Mass., Feb. 27, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- AMSC (NASDAQ:AMSC), a global energy solutions provider serving wind and power grid industry leaders, today announced that AMSC will partner with Black & Veatch to perform a study to evaluate solution options to improve the resiliency of Pacific Gas & Electric Company’s (PG&E) electric grid. Pacific Gas & Electric Company, a San Francisco, CA based subsidiary of PG&E Corporation (NYSE:NYSE:PCG) serving nearly 16 million people in Northern and Central California, is one of the largest combined natural gas and electric energy companies in the United States.
“Black & Veatch is a world class engineering and energy infrastructure development company,” said Daniel P. McGahn, AMSC President and CEO. “We look forward to expanding our relationship with Black & Veatch as we work to penetrate the electric distribution market with AMSC’s Resilient Electric Grid systems.” The study was awarded to Black & Veatch by PG&E following a competitive request for proposal (RFP) process and specifically requests that superconductor based technologies, such as AMSC’s Resilient Electric Grid (REG) system, be considered as solution options. The study will focus on evaluating REG as a potential option to backup or replace certain existing pipe-type cable circuits on PG&E’s grid, which were identified as vulnerable in an earlier PG&E study. Pipe-type cable technology has been the dominant transmission cable type in the United States from the 1940’s through the start of this century with thousands of miles installed.  In recent years, utilities have looked to replace these cables, which often utilize large quantities of environmentally harmful oil or SF6 gas, with more benign technologies.  AMSC’s Resilient Electric Grid Systems have the potential to help fill this market need. “Through the RFP for the study, PG&E has indicated interest in evaluating superconductor-based cable technologies as solution options for hardening the San Francisco electric grid against seismic events,” said John Rector, Associate Vice President of Black & Veatch. “Technologies that offer us compact, efficient, low environmental impact, and cost effective alternatives, such as the Resilient Electric Grid system, are of great interest to U.S. utilities.”  AMSC’s REG system is an innovative approach designed to increase reliability and capacity of the electric grid. By enabling the use of transmission and distribution assets in a way that is not feasible with traditional technologies, the REG system enables significant increases in grid reliability and increases load-serving capacity, while limiting the need for additional grid infrastructure, which mitigates environmental impact. “The Bay Area is one of the nation’s most critical regions. Safe, reliable and low impact electrical infrastructure is of particular importance to the citizens of San Francisco and the Bay Area,” said Daniel P. McGahn, AMSC President and CEO. “We believe that AMSC’s REG system will uniquely help PG&E meet their system resiliency goals and ensure safe and rapid recovery from major events. We are pleased that Pacific Gas & Electric is exploring the use of our REG system in its grid, and we look forward to understanding the needs of the utility.” About AMSC (NASDAQ:AMSC)
AMSC generates the ideas, technologies and solutions that meet the world's demand for smarter, cleaner … better energy™. Through its Windtec™ Solutions, AMSC provides wind turbine electronic controls and systems, designs and engineering services that reduce the cost of wind energy. Through its Gridtec™ Solutions, AMSC provides the engineering planning services and advanced grid systems that optimize network reliability, efficiency and performance. The Company's solutions are now powering gigawatts of renewable energy globally and are enhancing the performance and reliability of power networks in more than a dozen countries. Founded in 1987, AMSC is headquartered near Boston, Massachusetts with operations in Asia, Australia, Europe and North America. For more information, please visit www.amsc.com. About Black & Veatch
Black & Veatch is an employee-owned, global leader in building critical human infrastructure in Energy, Water, Telecommunications, and Government Services. Since 1915, Black & Veatch has helped its clients improve the lives of people in over 100 countries through consulting, engineering, construction, operations, and program management. About PG&E
Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a subsidiary of PG&E Corporation (NYSE:NYSE:PCG), is one of the largest combined natural gas and electric energy companies in the United States. Based in San Francisco, with more than 20,000 employees, the company delivers some of the nation’s cleanest energy to nearly 16 million people in Northern and Central California. For more information, visit www.pge.com/ and pge.com/news. AMSC, Windtec, Gridtec, and Smarter, Cleaner … Better Energy are trademarks or registered trademarks of American Superconductor Corporation. All other brand names, product names, trademarks, or service marks belong to their respective holders. Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such statements include, but are not limited to, expectations regarding our collaboration with Black & Veatch; and expectations regarding REG system and its contributions to PG&E’s electric grid, and other statements containing the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” “will” and similar expressions. Such forward-looking statements represent management’s current expectations and are inherently uncertain. There are a number of important factors that could materially impact the value of our common stock or cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements. These important factors include, but are not limited to: A significant portion of our revenues are derived from a single customer, Inox, and shipments to Inox may not commence in the time frame we expect or at all; We have a history of operating losses and negative operating cash flows, which may continue in the future and require us additional financing in the future; Our operating results may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and may fall below expectations in any particular fiscal quarter; Our financial condition may have an adverse effect on our customer and supplier relationships; Our success in addressing the wind energy market is dependent on the manufacturers that license our designs; Our success in addressing the wind energy market is dependent on the manufacturers that license our designs; Our success is dependent upon attracting and retaining qualified personnel and our inability to do so could significantly damage our business and prospects; We rely upon third-party suppliers for the components and sub-assemblies of many of our Wind and Grid products, making us vulnerable to supply shortages and price fluctuations; We may not realize all of the sales expected from our backlog of orders and contracts; Our success depends upon the commercial use of high temperature superconductor (“HTS”) products, which is currently limited, and a widespread commercial market for our products may not develop; Growth of the wind energy market depends largely on the availability and size of government subsidies and economic incentives; We have operations in and depend on sales in emerging markets, including India and China, and global conditions could negatively affect our operating results or limit our ability to expand our operations outside of these countries; We face risks related to our intellectual property; We face risks related to our legal proceedings; and the important factors discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” in Part 1. Item 1A of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, and our other reports filed with the SEC. These important factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by forward-looking statements made herein and presented elsewhere by management from time to time. Any such forward-looking statements represent management’s estimates as of the date of this press release. While we may elect to update such forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we disclaim any obligation to do so, even if subsequent events cause our views to change. These forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as representing our views as of any date subsequent to the date of this press release.
AMSC Contact:

Brion D. Tanous
CleanTech IR, Inc.
Phone: 424-634-8592
Email: [email protected]

Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 14.11
PCG's PE Ratio is ranked higher than
52% of the 542 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 17.13 vs. PCG: 14.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
PCG' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.54  Med: 17.39 Max: 42.78
Current: 14.11
9.54
42.78
Forward PE Ratio 13.95
PCG's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
53% of the 127 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 17.42 vs. PCG: 13.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 14.11
PCG's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked higher than
53% of the 544 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 17.50 vs. PCG: 14.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
PCG' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.57  Med: 17.39 Max: 42.78
Current: 14.11
10.57
42.78
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 38.72
PCG's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked lower than
76% of the 285 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 20.73 vs. PCG: 38.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
PCG' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.64  Med: 25.65 Max: 575.08
Current: 38.72
10.64
575.08
PB Ratio 1.57
PCG's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
57% of the 629 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 1.61 vs. PCG: 1.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
PCG' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.17  Med: 1.54 Max: 2.27
Current: 1.57
1.17
2.27
PS Ratio 1.62
PCG's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
54% of the 628 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 1.66 vs. PCG: 1.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
PCG' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.73  Med: 1.26 Max: 1.99
Current: 1.62
0.73
1.99
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 5.44
PCG's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
61% of the 403 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 8.18 vs. PCG: 5.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
PCG' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.47  Med: 5.91 Max: 8.6
Current: 5.44
3.47
8.6
EV-to-EBIT 14.11
PCG's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
55% of the 584 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 14.83 vs. PCG: 14.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
PCG' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8  Med: 15.3 Max: 37.5
Current: 14.11
8
37.5
EV-to-EBITDA 7.73
PCG's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
62% of the 600 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 10.26 vs. PCG: 7.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
PCG' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.4  Med: 7.3 Max: 12.4
Current: 7.73
4.4
12.4
EV-to-Revenue 2.67
PCG's EV-to-Revenue is ranked lower than
55% of the 633 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 2.56 vs. PCG: 2.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
PCG' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.3  Med: 2.2 Max: 3
Current: 2.67
1.3
3
Shiller PE Ratio 20.10
PCG's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked lower than
52% of the 228 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 23.33 vs. PCG: 20.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
PCG' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.34  Med: 21.39 Max: 69.53
Current: 20.1
14.34
69.53
Current Ratio 0.87
PCG's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
63% of the 635 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 1.03 vs. PCG: 0.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
PCG' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.56  Med: 0.86 Max: 2.51
Current: 0.87
0.56
2.51
Quick Ratio 0.80
PCG's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
61% of the 635 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 0.94 vs. PCG: 0.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
PCG' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.47  Med: 0.8 Max: 2.39
Current: 0.8
0.47
2.39
Days Inventory 32.15
PCG's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
64% of the 554 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 21.52 vs. PCG: 32.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
PCG' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 22.24  Med: 26.74 Max: 32.15
Current: 32.15
22.24
32.15
Days Sales Outstanding 24.44
PCG's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
85% of the 457 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 47.64 vs. PCG: 24.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
PCG' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 20.5  Med: 24.55 Max: 90.65
Current: 24.44
20.5
90.65
Days Payable 94.01
PCG's Days Payable is ranked higher than
66% of the 396 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 65.53 vs. PCG: 94.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
PCG' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 69.12  Med: 180.44 Max: 251
Current: 94.01
69.12
251

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 3.55
PCG's Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
59% of the 1061 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 3.29 vs. PCG: 3.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
PCG' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.62  Med: 3.89 Max: 5.15
Current: 3.55
2.62
5.15
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.49
PCG's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked higher than
78% of the 608 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 0.75 vs. PCG: 0.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
PCG' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.48  Med: 0.67 Max: 1.02
Current: 0.49
0.48
1.02
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 1.90
PCG's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked lower than
59% of the 379 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 4.00 vs. PCG: 1.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
PCG' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 8.4
Current: 1.9
0
8.4
Forward Dividend Yield % 3.97
PCG's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
57% of the 1052 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 3.14 vs. PCG: 3.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 3.69
PCG's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
56% of the 1059 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 4.06 vs. PCG: 3.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
PCG' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.73  Med: 4.05 Max: 5.36
Current: 3.69
2.73
5.36
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -3.50
PCG's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
53% of the 303 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: -2.80 vs. PCG: -3.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
PCG' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.1  Med: -0.5 Max: 5.7
Current: -3.5
-5.1
5.7

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 1.58
PCG's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked higher than
51% of the 577 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 1.90 vs. PCG: 1.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
PCG' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.8  Med: 1.53 Max: 4.74
Current: 1.58
0.8
4.74
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 4.62
PCG's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
85% of the 303 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 1.60 vs. PCG: 4.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
PCG' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.48  Med: 1.52 Max: 7.89
Current: 4.62
0.48
7.89
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.28
PCG's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
73% of the 547 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 1.11 vs. PCG: 1.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
PCG' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.25  Med: 0.89 Max: 1.49
Current: 1.28
0.25
1.49
Price-to-Graham-Number 0.99
PCG's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked higher than
57% of the 458 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. PCG: 0.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
PCG' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.29  Med: 1.11 Max: 1.88
Current: 0.99
0.29
1.88
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 7.10
PCG's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
50% of the 652 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 6.37 vs. PCG: 7.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
PCG' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.7  Med: 6.5 Max: 12.6
Current: 7.1
2.7
12.6
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -2.19
PCG's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
68% of the 418 Companies
in the Global Utilities - Regulated Electric industry.

( Industry Median: 3.68 vs. PCG: -2.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
PCG' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -11.4  Med: -6.1 Max: 20.2
Current: -2.19
-11.4
20.2

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $18,041.00
EPS (TTM) $ 4.07
Beta0.02
Short Percentage of Float1.23%
52-Week Range $49.83 - 71.57
Shares Outstanding (Mil)512.82

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 18,127 19,084
EPS ($) 3.68 3.82 4.01
EPS without NRI ($) 3.68 3.82 4.01
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
2.12%
Dividends per Share ($) 2.11 2.25 2.44

Piotroski F-Score Details

Piotroski F-Score: 77
Positive ROAY
Positive CFROAY
Higher ROA yoyY
CFROA > ROAY
Lower Leverage yoyY
Higher Current Ratio yoyN
Less Shares Outstanding yoyN
Higher Gross Margin yoyY
Higher Asset Turnover yoyY

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}