Switch to:
Also traded in: Argentina, Austria, Brazil, Chile, France, Germany, Mexico, Peru, Switzerland, UK

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.36
PG's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
56% of the 1666 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 0.49 vs. PG: 0.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
PG' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.08  Med: 0.3 Max: 0.62
Current: 0.36
0.08
0.62
Equity-to-Asset 0.44
PG's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
64% of the 1642 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 0.53 vs. PG: 0.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
PG' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.24  Med: 0.41 Max: 0.51
Current: 0.44
0.24
0.51
Debt-to-Equity 0.62
PG's Debt-to-Equity is ranked lower than
60% of the 1343 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 0.45 vs. PG: 0.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-Equity only.
PG' s Debt-to-Equity Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.41  Med: 0.61 Max: 2.05
Current: 0.62
0.41
2.05
Debt-to-EBITDA 2.01
PG's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
58% of the 1259 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 2.54 vs. PG: 2.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-EBITDA only.
PG' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.56  Med: 1.83 Max: 2.01
Current: 2.01
1.56
2.01
Interest Coverage 25.04
PG's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
64% of the 1437 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 10.10 vs. PG: 25.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
PG' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.87  Med: 21.82 Max: 30.01
Current: 25.04
11.87
30.01
Piotroski F-Score: 5
Altman Z-Score: 4.20
Beneish M-Score: -2.62
WACC vs ROIC
3.62%
14.73%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 20.06
PG's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
91% of the 1664 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 5.40 vs. PG: 20.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
PG' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 17.57  Med: 19.73 Max: 21.45
Current: 20.06
17.57
21.45
Net Margin % 16.13
PG's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
91% of the 1663 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 3.51 vs. PG: 16.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
PG' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.22  Med: 14.44 Max: 23.56
Current: 16.13
9.22
23.56
ROE % 19.71
PG's ROE % is ranked higher than
84% of the 1636 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 7.12 vs. PG: 19.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
PG' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.3  Med: 17.39 Max: 26.8
Current: 19.71
10.3
26.8
ROA % 8.83
PG's ROA % is ranked higher than
79% of the 1702 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 3.29 vs. PG: 8.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
PG' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.14  Med: 8.27 Max: 12.38
Current: 8.83
5.14
12.38
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 67.41
PG's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
92% of the 1689 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 11.84 vs. PG: 67.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
PG' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 54.64  Med: 67.99 Max: 77.37
Current: 67.41
54.64
77.37
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -1.70
PG's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
59% of the 1540 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 2.70 vs. PG: -1.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
PG' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -18.4  Med: 4.1 Max: 33.1
Current: -1.7
-18.4
33.1
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 5.00
PG's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
51% of the 1363 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 6.60 vs. PG: 5.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
PG' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -19.9  Med: 9 Max: 52.6
Current: 5
-19.9
52.6
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 8.90
PG's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
50% of the 1231 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 8.80 vs. PG: 8.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
PG' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -50.5  Med: 8.7 Max: 147
Current: 8.9
-50.5
147
GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with Procter & Gamble Co PG.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» PG's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2019-04-19)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2018

PG Guru Trades in Q1 2018

Lee Ainslie 19,950 sh (New)
Caxton Associates 19,048 sh (New)
Ken Fisher 9,493,070 sh (+3.75%)
Robert Olstein 55,000 sh (+48.65%)
Joel Greenblatt 713,756 sh (+1519.96%)
Charles Brandes 49,997 sh (+3.12%)
Yacktman Asset Management 15,382,957 sh (+1.45%)
Paul Tudor Jones 28,512 sh (+37.59%)
Jim Simons 2,691,929 sh (+100.17%)
Mairs and Power 346,388 sh (+1.93%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 2,038 sh (+296.50%)
Ray Dalio 390,041 sh (+226.31%)
Warren Buffett 315,400 sh (unchged)
Ron Baron 1,796 sh (unchged)
John Hussman 25,000 sh (unchged)
Yacktman Fund 7,800,000 sh (unchged)
John Buckingham Sold Out
Ruane Cunniff 17,760 sh (-42.05%)
Dodge & Cox 136,866 sh (-1.40%)
Murray Stahl 3,553 sh (-27.16%)
Tom Russo 52,860 sh (-12.52%)
Jeremy Grantham 10,100 sh (-15.13%)
Jeff Auxier 41,458 sh (-0.23%)
Chuck Royce 76,000 sh (-2.56%)
Diamond Hill Capital 2,848,046 sh (-0.55%)
Pioneer Investments 3,157,025 sh (-1.52%)
Mario Gabelli 97,067 sh (-6.10%)
Yacktman Focused Fund 4,775,000 sh (-0.52%)
» More
Q2 2018

PG Guru Trades in Q2 2018

Ken Fisher 9,844,145 sh (+3.70%)
Charles Brandes 50,959 sh (+1.92%)
Yacktman Asset Management 15,488,275 sh (+0.68%)
Jeremy Grantham 131,617 sh (+1203.14%)
Mairs and Power 353,046 sh (+1.92%)
Diamond Hill Capital 2,865,373 sh (+0.61%)
Pioneer Investments 6,310,812 sh (+99.90%)
Warren Buffett 315,400 sh (unchged)
Ruane Cunniff 17,760 sh (unchged)
Ron Baron 1,796 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen 400,000 sh (unchged)
Caxton Associates 100,000 sh (unchged)
Yacktman Focused Fund 4,775,000 sh (unchged)
Yacktman Fund 7,800,000 sh (unchged)
Lee Ainslie Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Caxton Associates Sold Out
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
Robert Olstein 45,000 sh (-18.18%)
Dodge & Cox 135,456 sh (-1.03%)
Joel Greenblatt 689,300 sh (-3.43%)
Murray Stahl 3,273 sh (-7.88%)
Tom Russo 48,842 sh (-7.60%)
John Hussman 10,000 sh (-60.00%)
Chuck Royce 70,500 sh (-7.24%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 1,872 sh (-8.15%)
Mario Gabelli 85,801 sh (-11.61%)
Jeff Auxier 41,032 sh (-1.03%)
» More
Q3 2018

PG Guru Trades in Q3 2018

Ray Dalio 28,325 sh (New)
George Soros 100,000 sh (New)
Ken Fisher 10,035,519 sh (+1.94%)
Jeremy Grantham 132,517 sh (+0.68%)
Pioneer Investments 7,231,432 sh (+14.59%)
Dodge & Cox 136,442 sh (+0.73%)
Yacktman Fund 7,800,000 sh (unchged)
Yacktman Focused Fund 4,775,000 sh (unchged)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 1,872 sh (unchged)
Ruane Cunniff 17,760 sh (unchged)
Ron Baron 1,796 sh (unchged)
Warren Buffett 315,400 sh (unchged)
John Hussman Sold Out
Murray Stahl Sold Out
Mario Gabelli 78,701 sh (-8.27%)
Robert Olstein 41,000 sh (-8.89%)
Yacktman Asset Management 15,465,829 sh (-0.14%)
Charles Brandes 49,200 sh (-3.45%)
Diamond Hill Capital 2,801,505 sh (-2.23%)
Chuck Royce 68,500 sh (-2.84%)
Tom Russo 47,439 sh (-2.87%)
Mairs and Power 340,019 sh (-3.69%)
Joel Greenblatt 593,967 sh (-13.83%)
Jeff Auxier 40,632 sh (-0.97%)
» More
Q4 2018

PG Guru Trades in Q4 2018

Jim Simons 203,329 sh (New)
Caxton Associates 84,648 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 126,500 sh (New)
Ken Fisher 10,334,800 sh (+2.98%)
Charles Brandes 50,876 sh (+3.41%)
Jeremy Grantham 242,017 sh (+82.63%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 2,056 sh (+9.83%)
Ron Baron 1,796 sh (unchged)
Warren Buffett 315,400 sh (unchged)
Robert Olstein Sold Out
Ray Dalio Sold Out
George Soros Sold Out
Yacktman Fund 5,700,000 sh (-26.92%)
Yacktman Focused Fund 3,400,000 sh (-28.80%)
Mario Gabelli 69,551 sh (-11.63%)
Yacktman Asset Management 12,240,893 sh (-20.85%)
Chuck Royce 49,500 sh (-27.74%)
Diamond Hill Capital 2,499,417 sh (-10.78%)
Tom Russo 45,511 sh (-4.06%)
Jeff Auxier 34,132 sh (-16.00%)
Ruane Cunniff 16,260 sh (-8.45%)
Mairs and Power 317,492 sh (-6.63%)
Dodge & Cox 132,827 sh (-2.65%)
Pioneer Investments 6,363,965 sh (-12.00%)
Joel Greenblatt 513,105 sh (-13.61%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with NYSE:PG

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

Guru Date Action
Impact Price Range
(Average)*
Change from Average Comment Current Shares
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Consumer Packaged Goods » Household & Personal Products    NAICS: 325620    SIC: 2844
Compare:LSE:ULVR, XAMS:UNIA, XPAR:OR, NYSE:CL, LSE:RB., NYSE:EL, XTER:HEN3, BOM:500696, NYSE:KMB, TSE:4452, ISX:UNVR, XTER:BEI, TSE:4911, XKRX:090435, XKRX:051905, OSTO:ESSITY B, NYSE:COTY, TSE:8113, NYSE:CLX, NYSE:NWL » details
Traded in other countries:PG.Argentina, PG.Austria, PGCO34.Brazil, PG.Chile, PGP.France, PRG.Germany, PG.Mexico, PG.Peru, PG.Switzerland, 0NOF.UK,
Headquarter Location:USA
Procter & Gamble Co is a consumer goods company. The firm markets its products internationally through various channels which include mass merchandisers, grocery stores, membership club stores, drug stores, and department stores.

Since its founding in 1837, Procter & Gamble has become the world's largest consumer product manufacturer. It operates with a lineup of leading brands, including 21 that generate more than $1 billion in annual global sales such as Tide laundry detergent, Charmin toilet paper, Pantene shampoo, and Pampers diapers. P&G sold its last remaining food brand, Pringles, to Kellogg in 2012. Sales outside its home turf represent about 60% of the firm's consolidated total, with around one third coming from emerging markets.

Guru Investment Theses on Procter & Gamble Co

Jeff Auxier Comments on Procter & Gamble Co. - Feb 12, 2019

Procter & Gamble Co. (NYSE:PG)



Management has focused on reducing their costs of products sold and their selling, general and administrative expenses in order to maximize the amount of capital they can return to shareholders. In the first quarter of their fiscal year, Procter & Gamble returned $3.2 billion to shareholders through dividends ($1.9 billion) and stock repurchases ($1.3 billion). Led by activist investor Nelson Peltz, PG has restructured its business around six “small business units” each with their own management team. They have reduced brands from 165 to 65 in order to compete with smaller, more nimble companies such as Harry’s Shave Club while still granting them the cost synergies of a massive company.

From Jeff Auxier (Trades, Portfolio)'s fourth-quarter 2018 market commentary.

Check out Jeff Auxier latest stock trades

Steven Romick Comments on Proctor & Gamble - Feb 07, 2019

Proctor & Gamble (NYSE:PG), or P&G, the storied consumer products company, is an example of a company we don’t own. Like many consumer staples companies, its moat is still substantial but not what it once was. The result is earnings growth of less than 2% over the past seven years, but its stock inexplicably trades at 20.8x 2019 consensus earnings estimates. Nonetheless, the Fund would have been better off owning it rather than many of its existing positions last year, as P&G delivered a total return of 3.57%. Yet P&G’s historic growth rate is lower than the Fund’s portfolio companies, which more importantly in our eyes, trade more inexpensively and offer better growth prospects. P&G is no better nor worse than a number of other consumer staples companies we could have discussed.



We find this illogical. Maybe the valuation disparity is due to expectations for a weaker economy that might allow consumer staples to outperform for a time. Or maybe it is due to passive investing, which makes indiscriminate purchases as a function of inflows. However, if the stock market didn’t offer irrational moments, everyone would invest in passive vehicles, and we wouldn’t be in business. We prefer our portfolio.





From Steven Romick (Trades, Portfolio)'s Crescent Fund fourth quarter 2018 shareholder letter.

Check out Steven Romick latest stock trades

Yacktman Fund Comments on Procter & Gamble - Jan 30, 2019

Consumer staples shares were generally stronger during the fourth quarter as businesses with consistency and quality were viewed as a relative safe haven during the period of market stress. Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG)’s shares were a standout in the staples group after reporting the highest quarterly organic sales growth since 2012, pointing to signs that, after many years of restructuring, a turnaround may be taking hold.



From Yacktman Fund (Trades, Portfolio)'s fourth quarter 2018 shareholder letter.

Check out Yacktman Fund latest stock trades

Yacktman Fund Comments on Procter & Gamble - Nov 07, 2018

P&G (NYSE:PG)’s shares recovered solidly with a general rebound in the consumer staples sector. Even after the rebound, P&G and consumer staples have underperformed significantly this year due to greater competition and disruption in the sector. We recognize that the many consumer staples businesses face a more difficult future. However, we think select companies like P&G, PepsiCo, and Coca-Cola offer solid opportunities amidst the challenges. The situation is not dissimilar to our decade-long investment in Fox, which was a successful investment despite the recent headwinds faced by traditional cable content owners.



From Yacktman Asset Management (Trades, Portfolio)'s Yacktman Fund (Trades, Portfolio) third quarter 2018 shareholder letter.

Check out Yacktman Fund latest stock trades

Yacktman Funds Comments on Procter & Gamble - Feb 19, 2018

After a long proxy battle, Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG) announced it would add Nelson Peltz of Trian Partners to the board of directors in 2018. We think Mr. Peltz, a significant shareholder and important voice for all owners, will improve PG’s focus. Several of our other highly successful investments— such as Sysco Corporation (where Trian Partners has two board seats), Microsoft and Fox—have benefited greatly from having a shareholder advocate in the boardroom.







From Yacktman Fund (Trades, Portfolio)s' fourth quarter 2017 shareholder letter.

Check out Donald Yacktman latest stock trades

Donald Yacktman Comments on Procter & Gamble’s - Oct 26, 2017

Procter & Gamble’s (NYSE:PG) (P&G) stock appreciated solidly during the quarter as a large shareholder sought a position on the board of directors in a proxy battle against the company. We publicly supported the addition of this highly qualified individual, especially because we felt he would bring an owner’s mentality to the Board. It appears at this time that the director candidate we supported will narrowly miss being added to the Board, but we believe the proxy fight has placed P&G under significant pressure to perform or transform.


From Yacktman Fund (Trades, Portfolio)'s third-quarter 2017 shareholder commentary.

Check out Donald Yacktman latest stock trades

Yacktman Fund Comments on Cisco - Aug 15, 2017

P&G (NYSE:PG)’s stock sold off modestly during the quarter, as the company struggled to generate acceptable unit volume growth. In recent years, P&G has significantly sharpened its focus by selling off non-core assets and cutting costs; however, we think the company can go much further in its efforts to revitalize the remaining businesses.



From Yacktman Fund (Trades, Portfolio)'s second quarter 2017 commentary.

Check out Yacktman Fund latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Procter & Gamble Co

Report: Exploring Fundamental Drivers Behind Procter & Gamble, Consolidated Edison, Lennar, Endo International plc, Box, and FRONT YARD RESIDENTIAL CORP — New Horizons, Emerging Trends, and Upcoming Developments
M13 and P&G to Partner on Consumer Innovation Incubator
Aether and Procter & Gamble Begin 3D Printing and AI Development Project
Factors of Influence in 2019, Key Indicators and Opportunity within Procter & Gamble, Hertz Global, NN, Omnicell, BioDelivery Sciences International, and Movado Group — New Research Emphasizes Economic Growth
Consumer Staples Will Soon Face Emerging Headwinds In a changing marketplace, pricing power as well as consumer loyalty will continue to diminish, resulting in eroding margins and slower earnings growth
For decades, consumer staples have been reliable defensive stocks in periods of economic downturn or market turbulence. Investors flocked to the sector because of the stocks' generous and stable dividends and the price elasticity the companies' brand products commanded due to long-term consumer loyalty. Read more...
Jeff Auxier Comments on Procter & Gamble Co. Guru stock highlight
Procter & Gamble Co. (NYSE:PG)
Read more...
Steven Romick Comments on Proctor & Gamble Guru stock highlight
Proctor & Gamble (NYSE:PG), or P&G, the storied consumer products company, is an example of a company we don’t own. Like many consumer staples companies, its moat is still substantial but not what it once was. The result is earnings growth of less than 2% over the past seven years, but its stock inexplicably trades at 20.8x 2019 consensus earnings estimates. Nonetheless, the Fund would have been better off owning it rather than many of its existing positions last year, as P&G delivered a total return of 3.57%. Yet P&G’s historic growth rate is lower than the Fund’s portfolio companies, which more importantly in our eyes, trade more inexpensively and offer better growth prospects. P&G is no better nor worse than a number of other consumer staples companies we could have discussed.
Read more...
Yacktman Focused Fund Trims Procter & Gamble, Coca-Cola Positions Fund's largest sales of the 4th quarter
The Yacktman Focused Fund (Trades, Portfolio) sold shares of the following stocks during the fourth quarter. Read more...
Yacktman Fund Comments on Procter & Gamble Guru stock highlight
Consumer staples shares were generally stronger during the fourth quarter as businesses with consistency and quality were viewed as a relative safe haven during the period of market stress. Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG)’s shares were a standout in the staples group after reporting the highest quarterly organic sales growth since 2012, pointing to signs that, after many years of restructuring, a turnaround may be taking hold.
Read more...
Is Procter & Gamble Worth Its Premium Price? The company’s current much-touted pricing power is evanescent and will diminish as competition increases and the staples sector continues to experience profound change
Procter & Gamble Co. (NYSE:PG) posted good results for its latest quarter, exceeding analyst expectations for some measures. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 24.88
PG's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
63% of the 1302 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 18.26 vs. PG: 24.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
PG' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.43  Med: 19.25 Max: 33.84
Current: 24.88
10.43
33.84
Forward PE Ratio 21.41
PG's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
70% of the 246 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 18.18 vs. PG: 21.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 24.88
PG's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
64% of the 1265 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 18.16 vs. PG: 24.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
PG' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.92  Med: 21.36 Max: 29.16
Current: 24.88
12.92
29.16
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 24.50
PG's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked lower than
59% of the 712 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 20.00 vs. PG: 24.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
PG' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.53  Med: 18.94 Max: 35.62
Current: 24.5
10.53
35.62
PB Ratio 4.83
PG's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
86% of the 1678 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 1.47 vs. PG: 4.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
PG' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.24  Med: 3.2 Max: 4.85
Current: 4.83
2.24
4.85
PS Ratio 4.03
PG's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
87% of the 1664 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 0.95 vs. PG: 4.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
PG' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.78  Med: 2.76 Max: 4.04
Current: 4.03
1.78
4.04
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 23.34
PG's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
51% of the 733 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. PG: 23.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
PG' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.53  Med: 20.25 Max: 27.04
Current: 23.34
12.53
27.04
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 17.79
PG's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
62% of the 1029 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 13.28 vs. PG: 17.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
PG' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.14  Med: 14.97 Max: 19.85
Current: 17.79
10.14
19.85
EV-to-EBIT 20.04
PG's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
64% of the 1404 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 14.69 vs. PG: 20.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
PG' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.7  Med: 16.5 Max: 22.1
Current: 20.04
10.7
22.1
EV-to-EBITDA 16.72
PG's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
68% of the 1456 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 11.48 vs. PG: 16.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
PG' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9  Med: 13.7 Max: 17.5
Current: 16.72
9
17.5
EV-to-Revenue 4.18
PG's EV-to-Revenue is ranked lower than
85% of the 1685 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 1.18 vs. PG: 4.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
PG' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.2  Med: 3.1 Max: 4.4
Current: 4.18
2.2
4.4
Shiller PE Ratio 24.28
PG's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked lower than
58% of the 537 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 20.26 vs. PG: 24.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
PG' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 16.92  Med: 20.94 Max: 31.38
Current: 24.28
16.92
31.38
Current Ratio 0.78
PG's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
88% of the 1657 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 1.60 vs. PG: 0.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
PG' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.66  Med: 1.04 Max: 1.52
Current: 0.78
0.66
1.52
Quick Ratio 0.61
PG's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
78% of the 1656 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 1.07 vs. PG: 0.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
PG' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.42  Med: 0.75 Max: 1.02
Current: 0.61
0.42
1.02
Days Inventory 53.61
PG's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
59% of the 1586 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 64.89 vs. PG: 53.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
PG' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 49.86  Med: 58.69 Max: 71.77
Current: 53.61
49.86
71.77
Days Sales Outstanding 27.57
PG's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
72% of the 1605 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 43.34 vs. PG: 27.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
PG' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 23.26  Med: 26.12 Max: 28.22
Current: 27.57
23.26
28.22
Days Payable 107.75
PG's Days Payable is ranked higher than
83% of the 1550 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 48.97 vs. PG: 107.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
PG' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 56.11  Med: 74.12 Max: 110.18
Current: 107.75
56.11
110.18

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 2.81
PG's Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
69% of the 1733 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 2.20 vs. PG: 2.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
PG' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.98  Med: 3.05 Max: 3.82
Current: 2.81
1.98
3.82
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.69
PG's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked lower than
79% of the 1057 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. PG: 0.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
PG' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.48  Med: 0.69 Max: 0.91
Current: 0.69
0.48
0.91
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 2.40
PG's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked lower than
59% of the 729 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 6.40 vs. PG: 2.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
PG' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.4  Med: 10.8 Max: 13.3
Current: 2.4
2.4
13.3
Forward Dividend Yield % 2.82
PG's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
65% of the 1637 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 2.35 vs. PG: 2.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 3.39
PG's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked higher than
67% of the 1709 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 2.74 vs. PG: 3.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
PG' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.39  Med: 3.68 Max: 4.6
Current: 3.39
2.39
4.6
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 2.70
PG's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
95% of the 845 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: -2.70 vs. PG: 2.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
PG' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -7.1  Med: 0.7 Max: 3.1
Current: 2.7
-7.1
3.1

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 1.83
PG's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
64% of the 865 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 1.30 vs. PG: 1.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
PG' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.9  Med: 1.72 Max: 5.58
Current: 1.83
0.9
5.58
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.46
PG's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
76% of the 1530 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 0.95 vs. PG: 1.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
PG' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.26  Med: 0.97 Max: 1.47
Current: 1.46
0.26
1.47
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 4.98
PG's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
51% of the 1752 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 5.25 vs. PG: 4.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
PG' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.5  Med: 6.1 Max: 9.4
Current: 4.98
4.5
9.4
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 5.39
PG's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
54% of the 998 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 8.21 vs. PG: 5.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
PG' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.1  Med: 4.8 Max: 16.4
Current: 5.39
2.1
16.4

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $66,912.00
EPS (TTM) $ 4.12
Beta0.22
Volatility15.34%
52-Week Range $70.73 - 102.89
Shares Outstanding (Mil)2,501.58

Analyst Estimate

Jun19 Jun20 Jun21
Revenue (Mil $) 67,134 69,328 72,170
EBIT (Mil $) 14,331 15,305 16,084
EBITDA (Mil $) 17,088 18,120 19,152
EPS ($) 4.42 4.71 4.96
EPS without NRI ($) 4.42 4.71 4.96
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
6.99%
Dividends per Share ($) 2.92 3.09 3.21

Piotroski F-Score Details

Piotroski F-Score: 55
Positive ROAY
Positive CFROAY
Higher ROA yoyN
CFROA > ROAY
Lower Leverage yoyY
Higher Current Ratio yoyN
Less Shares Outstanding yoyY
Higher Gross Margin yoyN
Higher Asset Turnover yoyN

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}