Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.21
SM's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
73% of the 461 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.51 vs. SM: 0.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
SM' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.19 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.21
0
No Debt
Equity-to-Asset 0.41
SM's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
68% of the 423 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.54 vs. SM: 0.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
SM' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.19  Med: 0.48 Max: 0.83
Current: 0.41
0.19
0.83
Debt-to-Equity 1.07
SM's Debt-to-Equity is ranked lower than
80% of the 301 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.46 vs. SM: 1.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-Equity only.
SM' s Debt-to-Equity Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.34 Max: 1.93
Current: 1.07
0.01
1.93
Debt-to-EBITDA 3.31
SM's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
84% of the 255 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.98 vs. SM: 3.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-EBITDA only.
SM' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -11.48  Med: 1.28 Max: 7.72
Current: 3.31
-11.48
7.72
Interest Coverage 1.17
SM's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 295 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 10.62 vs. SM: 1.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
SM' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.03  Med: 6.76 Max: 19.37
Current: 1.17
0.03
19.37
Piotroski F-Score: 6
Altman Z-Score: 1.10
Beneish M-Score: -2.80
WACC vs ROIC
18.01%
5.58%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 14.21
SM's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
59% of the 429 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -2.34 vs. SM: 14.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
SM' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -34.8  Med: 15.91 Max: 40.11
Current: 14.21
-34.8
40.11
Net Margin % 15.37
SM's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
58% of the 429 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -4.39 vs. SM: 15.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
SM' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -64.2  Med: 1.59 Max: 26.41
Current: 15.37
-64.2
26.41
ROE % 8.59
SM's ROE % is ranked lower than
55% of the 433 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -3.31 vs. SM: 8.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
SM' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -34.84  Med: 2.43 Max: 34.21
Current: 8.59
-34.84
34.21
ROA % 3.43
SM's ROA % is ranked higher than
52% of the 497 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -3.08 vs. SM: 3.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
SM' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.61  Med: 0.98 Max: 11.91
Current: 3.43
-12.61
11.91
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 6.10
SM's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
50% of the 466 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -2.70 vs. SM: 6.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
SM' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -19.36  Med: 3.43 Max: 24.94
Current: 6.1
-19.36
24.94
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -32.70
SM's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
73% of the 373 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -19.90 vs. SM: -32.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
SM' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -32.7  Med: 16.9 Max: 47.3
Current: -32.7
-32.7
47.3
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -50.10
SM's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
90% of the 340 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -8.70 vs. SM: -50.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
SM' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 18.8 Max: 60.5
Current: -50.1
0
60.5
GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Signs with SM Energy Co SM.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» SM's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2018-11-01 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2017

SM Guru Trades in Q3 2017

Steven Cohen 498,800 sh (+1420.73%)
First Pacific Advisors 1,880,100 sh (+9.03%)
FPA Capital Fund 876,610 sh (+4.68%)
Jeremy Grantham Sold Out
Sarah Ketterer 8,867,304 sh (-8.79%)
Jim Simons 143,600 sh (-80.52%)
» More
Q4 2017

SM Guru Trades in Q4 2017

Pioneer Investments 6,071 sh (New)
Jim Simons 473,200 sh (+229.53%)
FPA Capital Fund 867,115 sh (-1.08%)
Sarah Ketterer 8,634,955 sh (-2.62%)
First Pacific Advisors 1,790,607 sh (-4.76%)
Steven Cohen 125,500 sh (-74.84%)
» More
Q1 2018

SM Guru Trades in Q1 2018

Lee Ainslie 396,610 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 1,626,200 sh (+1195.78%)
First Pacific Advisors 2,396,620 sh (+33.84%)
FPA Capital Fund 992,415 sh (+14.45%)
Pioneer Investments 6,879 sh (+13.31%)
Sarah Ketterer 8,882,331 sh (+2.86%)
Jim Simons Sold Out
» More
Q2 2018

SM Guru Trades in Q2 2018

HOTCHKIS & WILEY 147,313 sh (New)
Arnold Schneider 522,057 sh (New)
Ron Baron 39,100 sh (New)
Pioneer Investments 204,900 sh (+2878.63%)
First Pacific Advisors 2,024,522 sh (-15.53%)
FPA Capital Fund 802,903 sh (-19.10%)
Sarah Ketterer 6,258,040 sh (-29.55%)
Lee Ainslie 275,390 sh (-30.56%)
Steven Cohen 215,700 sh (-86.74%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with NYSE:SM

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
FPA Capital Fund 2018-06-30 Reduce -19.10%1.29%$16.49 - $27.18 $ 31.9437%802,903
Arnold Schneider 2018-06-30 New Buy2.63%$16.49 - $27.18 $ 31.9437%522,057
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 2018-06-30 New Buy0.01%$16.49 - $27.18 $ 31.9437%147,313
Ron Baron 2018-06-30 New Buy$16.49 - $27.18 $ 31.9437%39,100
FPA Capital Fund 2018-03-31 Add 14.45%0.85%$17.22 - $26.89 $ 31.9448%992,415
FPA Capital Fund 2017-12-31 Reduce -1.08%0.06%$16.98 - $22.94 $ 31.9458%867,115
FPA Capital Fund 2017-09-30 Add 4.68%0.23%$12.79 - $18.77 $ 31.94104%876,610
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!
Premium More recent guru trades are included for USA Subscribe Members only!!
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - E&P » Oil & Gas E&P    NAICS: 211120    SIC: 1311
Compare:SZSE:002221, NYSE:WRD, NYSE:LPI, TSX:PXT, NYSE:CHK, ASX:BPT, NYSE:KOS, NAS:XOG, NYSE:SWN, MIC:RNFT, NYSE:CPE, TSX:ERF, NYSE:JAG, NAS:TELL, OTCPK:LNGG, TSX:WCP, HKSE:00467, OSL:DNO, NAS:VNOM, NYSE:CNX » details
Traded in other countries:SJL.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
SM Energy Company is an energy company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development, and production of oil, gas, and natural gas liquids in onshore North America.

SM Energy is an independent energy company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development, and production of crude oil and condensate, natural gas, and natural gas liquids. Operating primarily out of the United States, the company actively participates in joint ventures, prospects/leaseholds and drill-to-earn opportunities. The majority of the company's revenue is derived from some of the United States' premier drilling locations. Drilling location interests have been traditionally obtained through oil and gas leases from third parties. SM Energy relies on its fleet of geologists, geophysicists, landmen, and engineers to help extract the full potential out of all properties held.

Guru Investment Theses on SM Energy Co

Keeley Management Comments on SM Energy - Jul 30, 2018

SM Energy (NYSE:SM) (SM - $25.69 – NYSE) is a mid-sized oil and gas exploration and production company with most of its core operations in the Permian Basin in Texas. We believe that SM has more leverage than most E&P companies, and its capital plan is not quite as well funded. As a result, its share price tends to be more sensitive to changes in crude prices. The 14% rise in the price of crude combined with strong drilling results drove the shares higher in the second quarter.





From Keeley Management's Mid Cap Dividend Value Fund second quarter 2018 shareholder letter.



Check out Keeley Asset Management Corp latest stock trades

FPA Capital Comments on SM Energy - Jan 30, 2017

SM Energy (NYSE:SM) also detracted from the Fund’s performance in the quarter by 14 basis points. SM declined in the quarter because the company issued a large secondary offering of stock to help pay for a couple of large properties it acquired in the Permian Basin. We agree with management that the Permian Basin offers very attractive oil and gas properties, but these properties will take a couple of years to develop and start producing cash flow for shareholders. In anticipation of a large equity offering, and after benefitting from the stock’s substantial appreciation during 2016, we had already reduced the Fund’s position in the stock by over 60% before the quarter commenced. Notably, SM was up 75% for the year, even after an approximately 11% decline in the fourth quarter.



From FPA Capital's fourth quarter 2016 commentary.



Check out FPA Capital Fund latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about SM Energy Co

SM Energy Company Announces Early Results Of Tender Offer And Consent Solicitation
Arnold Schneider’s Top 5 Buys in 2nd Quarter Top buys include Einhorn’s Brighthouse Financial
Arnold Schneider (Trades, Portfolio), founder and chief investment officer of Schneider Capital Management, disclosed on Monday that his five top buys for the second quarter were Brighthouse Financial Inc. (NASDAQ:BHF), SM Energy Co. (NYSE:SM), Manitowoc Co. Inc. (NYSE:MTW), Arconic Inc. (NYSE:ARNC) and American International Group Inc. (NYSE:AIG). Read more...
Report: Exploring Fundamental Drivers Behind AMERISAFE, SM Energy, Papa John's International, CNX Resources, Public Service Enterprise Group, and Chimera Investment — New Horizons, Emerging Trends, and Upcoming Developments
SM Energy Prices $500 Million Public Offering Of Senior Notes Due 2027
SM Energy Company Announces Cash Tender Offer For Any And All Of Its 6.500% Senior Notes Due 2023 And Up To $85 Million Aggregate Principal Amount Of Its 6.125% Senior Notes Due 2022 And Related Solicitation Of Consent
SM Energy Announces Public Offering Of $500 Million Of Senior Notes Due 2027
Keeley Management Comments on SM Energy Guru stock highlight
SM Energy (NYSE:SM) (SM - $25.69 – NYSE) is a mid-sized oil and gas exploration and production company with most of its core operations in the Permian Basin in Texas. We believe that SM has more leverage than most E&P companies, and its capital plan is not quite as well funded. As a result, its share price tends to be more sensitive to changes in crude prices. The 14% rise in the price of crude combined with strong drilling results drove the shares higher in the second quarter. Read more...
FPA Capital Fund 2nd-Quarter 2018 Commentary Discussion of holdings and market
FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio) (the “Fund”) was up 3.41% for the second quarter of 2018. Small capitalization indices continue to outperform large cap indices (the Russell 2500 Index was up 5.71% year-to-date vs. S&P 500 Index's 3.43% increase) .1 This major shift toward small cap stocks is likely due to the belief that smaller U.S. companies will fare better than larger U.S. companies during a trade war. It remains to be seen whether this simple reasoning will prove to be correct. But even if that premise is correct, are investors getting paid enough for the small-cap risk? The Russell 2500 Index is trading at a 33x earnings multiple vs. S&P 500 Index's 21x multiple2. Value remains out of favor (the Russell 2500 Growth Index up 8.04% year-to-date vs. Russell 2500 Value Index's 3% increase). Looking at a more relevant peer group as described by Morningstar3, we were in the 39th percentile of our category year-to-date as of June 30. Read more...
SM Energy Announces Second Quarter Preview: Strong Production And Realized Prices Drive High Margin Growth
SM Energy Provides Interim Second Quarter Update - Production Exceeding Expectations

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 16.56
SM's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 208 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 11.83 vs. SM: 16.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
SM' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.15  Med: 17.01 Max: 95.33
Current: 16.56
3.15
95.33
Forward PE Ratio 19.12
SM's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 137 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 16.64 vs. SM: 19.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 16.56
SM's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 210 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 12.65 vs. SM: 16.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
SM' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.15  Med: 17.01 Max: 95.33
Current: 16.56
3.15
95.33
PB Ratio 1.30
SM's PB Ratio is ranked higher than
65% of the 430 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.30 vs. SM: 1.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
SM' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.3  Med: 2.08 Max: 7.28
Current: 1.3
0.3
7.28
PS Ratio 2.52
SM's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
66% of the 402 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.73 vs. SM: 2.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
SM' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.37  Med: 2.24 Max: 5.1
Current: 2.52
0.37
5.1
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 6.15
SM's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
67% of the 279 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 5.94 vs. SM: 6.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
SM' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.56  Med: 4 Max: 9.97
Current: 6.15
0.56
9.97
EV-to-EBIT 17.65
SM's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 225 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 12.76 vs. SM: 17.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
SM' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -278.7  Med: 8.65 Max: 103.4
Current: 17.65
-278.7
103.4
EV-to-EBITDA 6.69
SM's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
69% of the 298 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 7.99 vs. SM: 6.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
SM' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -548.4  Med: 5.7 Max: 19.7
Current: 6.69
-548.4
19.7
EV-to-Revenue 4.12
SM's EV-to-Revenue is ranked lower than
52% of the 417 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 4.03 vs. SM: 4.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
SM' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1  Med: 3.2 Max: 5.5
Current: 4.12
1
5.5
Shiller PE Ratio 3024.62
SM's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 79 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 13.64 vs. SM: 3024.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
SM' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.66  Med: 31.37 Max: 3154
Current: 3024.62
4.66
3154
Current Ratio 0.91
SM's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
58% of the 479 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.23 vs. SM: 0.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
SM' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.54  Med: 1.12 Max: 4.75
Current: 0.91
0.54
4.75
Quick Ratio 0.91
SM's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
56% of the 479 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.15 vs. SM: 0.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
SM' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.54  Med: 1.12 Max: 4.75
Current: 0.91
0.54
4.75
Days Sales Outstanding 45.74
SM's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
76% of the 375 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 48.34 vs. SM: 45.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
SM' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 44.23  Med: 50.94 Max: 65.16
Current: 45.74
44.23
65.16

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 0.32
SM's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
93% of the 309 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.40 vs. SM: 0.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
SM' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.11  Med: 0.25 Max: 1.21
Current: 0.32
0.11
1.21
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.05
SM's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 128 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.48 vs. SM: 0.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
SM' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.03 Max: 0.07
Current: 0.05
0.01
0.07
Forward Dividend Yield % 0.32
SM's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
95% of the 284 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.52 vs. SM: 0.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 0.32
SM's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
89% of the 415 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.93 vs. SM: 0.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
SM' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.11  Med: 0.25 Max: 1.21
Current: 0.32
0.11
1.21
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -18.30
SM's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
67% of the 369 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -11.00 vs. SM: -18.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
SM' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -18.3  Med: -3.1 Max: 0.9
Current: -18.3
-18.3
0.9

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 1.31
SM's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked higher than
68% of the 407 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.40 vs. SM: 1.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
SM' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.72  Med: 2.15 Max: 7.56
Current: 1.31
0.72
7.56
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.13
SM's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
54% of the 342 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.85 vs. SM: 1.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
SM' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.33  Med: 1.22 Max: 2.37
Current: 1.13
0.33
2.37
Price-to-Graham-Number 0.98
SM's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 166 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.87 vs. SM: 0.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
SM' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.45  Med: 1.43 Max: 11.07
Current: 0.98
0.45
11.07
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 5.66
SM's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
59% of the 496 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -0.99 vs. SM: 5.66 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
SM' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -29.3  Med: 5.8 Max: 26.4
Current: 5.66
-29.3
26.4
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -18.46
SM's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
76% of the 186 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -15.06 vs. SM: -18.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
SM' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -105.1  Med: -4.1 Max: 17.9
Current: -18.46
-105.1
17.9

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $1,425.92
EPS (TTM) $ 1.93
Beta4.49
Volatility53.25%
52-Week Range $16.11 - 32.09
Shares Outstanding (Mil)112.14

Analyst Estimate

Dec18 Dec19 Dec20
Revenue (Mil $) 1,773 1,845 2,376
EBIT (Mil $) 201 378 743
EBITDA (Mil $) 899 1,164 1,626
EPS ($) 0.25 1.36 4.25
EPS without NRI ($) 0.25 1.36 4.25
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($) 0.10 0.10 0.10

Piotroski F-Score Details

Piotroski F-Score: 66
Positive ROAY
Positive CFROAY
Higher ROA yoyY
CFROA > ROAY
Lower Leverage yoyY
Higher Current Ratio yoyN
Less Shares Outstanding yoyN
Higher Gross Margin yoyY
Higher Asset Turnover yoyN

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}