Switch to:
Also traded in: Canada, Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.17
PGH's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
70% of the 449 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.72 vs. PGH: 0.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
PGH' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.02 Max: 0.82
Current: 0.17
0
0.82
Equity-to-Asset 0.41
PGH's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
67% of the 423 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.51 vs. PGH: 0.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
PGH' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.36  Med: 0.6 Max: 0.82
Current: 0.41
0.36
0.82
Piotroski F-Score: 5
Altman Z-Score: -1.45
Beneish M-Score: -2.86
WACC vs ROIC
11.93%
-8.04%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 3/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % -64.86
PGH's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
51% of the 429 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -45.13 vs. PGH: -64.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
PGH' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -86.29  Med: 0.4 Max: 18.71
Current: -64.86
-86.29
18.71
Net Margin % -81.00
PGH's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
52% of the 429 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -49.17 vs. PGH: -81.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
PGH' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -98.73  Med: 3.41 Max: 20.89
Current: -81
-98.73
20.89
ROE % -25.71
PGH's ROE % is ranked lower than
56% of the 420 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -13.16 vs. PGH: -25.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
PGH' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -46.6  Med: 1.47 Max: 14.61
Current: -25.71
-46.6
14.61
ROA % -9.86
PGH's ROA % is ranked higher than
57% of the 496 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -9.02 vs. PGH: -9.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
PGH' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -20.39  Med: 0.88 Max: 7.5
Current: -9.86
-20.39
7.5
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % -11.89
PGH's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
60% of the 470 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -13.05 vs. PGH: -11.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
PGH' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -25.96  Med: 0.89 Max: 10.41
Current: -11.89
-25.96
10.41
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -29.90
PGH's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
70% of the 369 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -18.20 vs. PGH: -29.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
PGH' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -29.9  Med: -3.65 Max: 21.2
Current: -29.9
-29.9
21.2
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -35.80
PGH's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
71% of the 303 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -21.60 vs. PGH: -35.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
PGH' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -77.7  Med: -4.1 Max: 26.6
Current: -35.8
-77.7
26.6
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -4.00
PGH's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
56% of the 272 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -11.00 vs. PGH: -4.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
PGH' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -54.6  Med: -6.3 Max: 55.9
Current: -4
-54.6
55.9
GuruFocus has detected 2 Warning Signs with Pengrowth Energy Corp $PGH.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» PGH's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-06-01 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2016

PGH Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Charles Brandes 153,000 sh (New)
Chuck Royce 4,096,900 sh (+8.07%)
Jeremy Grantham Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
Ken Fisher 11,000 sh (-21.43%)
» More
Q3 2016

PGH Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Chuck Royce 4,299,400 sh (+4.94%)
Charles Brandes 153,000 sh (unchged)
Ken Fisher 11,000 sh (unchged)
» More
Q4 2016

PGH Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Jim Simons 44,518 sh (New)
Chuck Royce 4,539,400 sh (+5.58%)
Ken Fisher 11,000 sh (unchged)
Charles Brandes 93,000 sh (-39.22%)
» More
Q1 2017

PGH Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Ken Fisher 11,000 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Charles Brandes Sold Out
Chuck Royce 4,534,400 sh (-0.11%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with PGH

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - E&P » Oil & Gas E&P    NAICS: 211111    SIC: 711
Compare:OTCPK:CNNEF, OTCPK:ATHOF, OTCPK:CWEGF, NYSE:GPRK, NYSE:CRC, NAS:DMLP, NYSE:SN, OTCPK:TETZF, OTCPK:BNPUF, OTCPK:ENQUF, NYSE:PBT, OTCPK:BNEFF, OTCPK:SOCLF, OTCPK:IACAF, NYSE:SGY, AMEX:MPO, OTCPK:ZPTAF, OTCPK:TNEYF, OTCPK:PMOIY, NYSE:ECR » details
Traded in other countries:PGF.Canada, P8K.Germany,
Headquarter Location:Canada
Pengrowth Energy Corp is engaged in the development, production and acquisition and exploration of oil and natural gas reserves in the provinces of Alberta, British Columbia, Saskatchewan and Nova Scotia.

Pengrowth Energy is an intermediate Canadian oil and natural gas producer. The company has exposure to the Cardium light oil play, Swan Hills light oil play, and Montney natural gas projects in Canada. Pengrowth's production consists of natural gas, oil, and natural gas liquids, with natural gas constituting a predominant majority of production. Royalties are needed for Pengrowth to explore and develop any oilfields it may come across. Pengrowth actively controls where its production is shipped so that it can monitor and take advantage of favorable pricing opportunities in North American markets.

Top Ranked Articles about Pengrowth Energy Corp

Pengrowth Receives Regulatory Approval for the 17,500 Barrel Per Day Second Commercial Phase of the Lindbergh Thermal Project

CALGARY, ALBERTA--(Marketwired - May 30, 2016) - Pengrowth Energy Corporation (TSX:PGF) (NYSE:PGH) today announced that it has received the anticipated Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act (EPEA) approval for the 17,500 barrel per day (bbl per day) second commercial phase of its Lindbergh thermal project. The approval contains no conditions that materially change the estimated cost, scope or timing of the project. This approval marks the culmination of approximately 30 months of project review by stakeholders and regulators. The second commercial phase is designed to add 17,500 bbl per day of incremental capacity, resulting in total nameplate capacity from Lindbergh of 30,000 bbl per day at a steam oil ratio (SOR) of 3.6, once the expansion phase is complete. Capital cost estimates and commitments for the second phase have not been finalized and will likely not be pursued until market conditions are more supportive of these activities. Lindbergh, Pengrowth's 100 percent owned and operated thermal project, is located in the Cold Lake area of eastern Alberta. The project offers Pengrowth the potential to ultimately develop annual production of 40,000 to 50,000 bbl per day, starting with the 12,500 bbl per day nameplate capacity first commercial phase, which came on-stream in 2015. Production from the first commercial phase has continued to ramp-up, averaging 15,256 bbl per day in the first quarter of 2016 at an average SOR of 2.3. The original two pilot well pairs that have been on production for over 48 months and have recovered approximately 2.3 million barrels of the 2.4 million barrels that were originally estimated to be recovered. Performance from the pilot wells continues to be robust with the current combined production rate from the two well pairs being approximately 1,300 bbl per day at an average SOR of 3.3. "We are delighted to have received final regulatory approval for the second commercial phase at Lindbergh, which, to date, has been among the best performing thermal bitumen projects in western Canada," said Derek Evans, President and CEO of Pengrowth. "This expansion will be part of our transition to building a portfolio of highly economic thermal oil assets with low SORs, low declines, low sustaining capital and strong capital efficiencies. The hallmarks of long-term sustainability." About Pengrowth: Pengrowth Energy Corporation is an intermediate Canadian producer of oil and natural gas, headquartered in Calgary, Alberta. Pengrowth's assets include the Lindbergh thermal oil, Cardium light oil, Swan Hills light oil and the Groundbirch and Bernadet Montney gas projects. Pengrowth's shares trade on both the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol "PGF" and on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "PGH". PENGROWTH ENERGY CORPORATION Derek Evans, President and Chief Executive Officer For further information about Pengrowth, please visit our website www.pengrowth.com or contact: Investor Relations, E-mail: [email protected]. Caution Regarding Forward Looking Information: This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of securities laws, including the "safe harbour" provisions of the Canadian securities legislation and the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking information is often, but not always, identified by the use of words such as "anticipate", "believe", "expect", "plan", "intend", "forecast", "target", "project", "guidance", "may", "will", "should", "could", "estimate", "predict" or similar words suggesting future outcomes or language suggesting an outlook. Forward-looking statements in this press release include, but are not limited to, statements with respect the conditions in the EPEA approval and their lack of impact on estimated cost, scope and timing of the expansion; design capacity of the second commercial phase and overall project post expansion; timing of capital cost estimates and commitments; project production potential; and transition to building a highly economic thermal assets. Forward-looking statements and information are based on current beliefs as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to Pengrowth concerning anticipated financial performance, business prospects, strategies and regulatory developments. Although management considers these assumptions to be reasonable based on information currently available to it, they may prove to be incorrect. By their very nature, forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, both general and specific, and risks that predictions, forecasts, projections and other forward-looking statements will not be achieved. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on these statements as a number of important factors could cause the actual results to differ materially from the beliefs, plans, objectives, expectations and anticipations, estimates and intentions expressed in such forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to: changes in general economic, market and business conditions; the volatility of oil and gas prices; fluctuations in production and development costs and capital expenditures; the imprecision of reserve estimates and estimates of recoverable quantities of oil, natural gas and liquids; Pengrowth's ability to replace and expand oil and gas reserves; geological, technical, drilling and processing problems and other difficulties in producing reserves; environmental claims and liabilities; incorrect assessments of value when making acquisitions; increases in debt service charges; the loss of key personnel; the marketability of production; defaults by third party operators; unforeseen title defects; fluctuations in foreign currency and exchange rates; fluctuations in interest rates; inadequate insurance coverage; compliance with environmental laws and regulations; actions by governmental or regulatory agencies, including changes in tax laws; the failure to qualify as a mutual fund trust; Pengrowth's ability to access external sources of debt and equity capital; the impact of foreign and domestic government programs and the occurrence of unexpected events involved in the operation and development of oil and gas properties. Further information regarding these factors may be found under the heading "Business Risks" in the MD&A and under "Risk Factors" in the AIF. The foregoing list of factors that may affect future results is not exhaustive. When relying on our forward-looking statements to make decisions, investors and others should carefully consider the foregoing factors and other uncertainties and potential events. Furthermore, the forward-looking statements contained in this press release are made as of the date of this press release, and Pengrowth does not undertake any obligation to update publicly or to revise any of the included forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable laws. The forward-looking statements contained in this press release are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement.





Pengrowth
Wassem Khalil
Manager, Investor Relations
(403) 233-0224 or Toll free 1-855-336-8814
[email protected]
www.pengrowth.com




Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PB Ratio 0.48
PGH's PB Ratio is ranked higher than
83% of the 420 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.22 vs. PGH: 0.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
PGH' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.24  Med: 1.01 Max: 3.15
Current: 0.48
0.24
3.15
PS Ratio 1.37
PGH's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
75% of the 405 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.60 vs. PGH: 1.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
PGH' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.36  Med: 2.05 Max: 3.74
Current: 1.37
0.36
3.74
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 1.86
PGH's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
90% of the 125 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 15.92 vs. PGH: 1.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
PGH' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.49  Med: 8.82 Max: 125.63
Current: 1.86
1.49
125.63
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 1.52
PGH's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
91% of the 267 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 8.20 vs. PGH: 1.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
PGH' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.9  Med: 4.67 Max: 7.06
Current: 1.52
0.9
7.06
EV-to-EBIT -4.43
PGH's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 209 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 16.34 vs. PGH: -4.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
PGH' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -949.4  Med: 11.3 Max: 194.7
Current: -4.43
-949.4
194.7
EV-to-EBITDA -23.07
PGH's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
79% of the 399 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 12.98 vs. PGH: -23.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
PGH' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -188.1  Med: 6.5 Max: 252.9
Current: -23.07
-188.1
252.9
Shiller PE Ratio 23.98
PGH's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked lower than
76% of the 79 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 16.38 vs. PGH: 23.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
PGH' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.4  Med: 7.26 Max: 76
Current: 23.98
2.4
76
Current Ratio 1.09
PGH's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
73% of the 480 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.23 vs. PGH: 1.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
PGH' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.23  Med: 0.65 Max: 15.67
Current: 1.09
0.23
15.67
Quick Ratio 1.09
PGH's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
72% of the 479 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.12 vs. PGH: 1.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
PGH' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.23  Med: 0.64 Max: 15.67
Current: 1.09
0.23
15.67
Days Sales Outstanding 67.60
PGH's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
63% of the 381 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 55.27 vs. PGH: 67.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
PGH' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 28.42  Med: 44.54 Max: 67.6
Current: 67.6
28.42
67.6
Days Payable 161.81
PGH's Days Payable is ranked higher than
73% of the 238 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 88.02 vs. PGH: 161.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
PGH' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 102.44  Med: 147.26 Max: 181.72
Current: 161.81
102.44
181.72

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate -100.00
PGH's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked lower than
78% of the 98 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -33.20 vs. PGH: -100.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
PGH' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -100  Med: -6 Max: 35.4
Current: -100
-100
35.4
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 0.13
PGH's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
98% of the 404 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.73 vs. PGH: 0.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
PGH' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.11  Med: 2.86 Max: 10.05
Current: 0.13
0.11
10.05
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -1.70
PGH's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
77% of the 365 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -9.80 vs. PGH: -1.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
PGH' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -37.4  Med: -17.15 Max: -1.7
Current: -1.7
-37.4
-1.7

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 0.49
PGH's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked higher than
84% of the 393 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.28 vs. PGH: 0.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
PGH' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.29  Med: 1.51 Max: 3.66
Current: 0.49
0.29
3.66
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 0.37
PGH's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
89% of the 104 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.33 vs. PGH: 0.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
PGH' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.28  Med: 0.73 Max: 27.38
Current: 0.37
0.28
27.38
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.68
PGH's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
69% of the 345 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.02 vs. PGH: 0.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
PGH' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.19  Med: 1.25 Max: 2.23
Current: 0.68
0.19
2.23
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % -22.54
PGH's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
89% of the 565 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -3.19 vs. PGH: -22.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
PGH' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -22.72  Med: 4.7 Max: 18
Current: -22.54
-22.72
18
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -28.94
PGH's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
70% of the 169 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -16.11 vs. PGH: -28.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
PGH' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -50.4  Med: 3.5 Max: 24.3
Current: -28.94
-50.4
24.3

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $376.2
EPS (TTM) $ -0.57
Beta2.60
Short Percentage of Float0.00%
52-Week Range $0.76 - 2.05
Shares Outstanding (Mil)552.25

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 365 350
EPS ($) -0.17 -0.05 0.03
EPS without NRI ($) -0.17 -0.05 0.03
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($)
» More Articles for PGH

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Pengrowth Announces Release Date for Its 2016 Third Quarter Results and Conference Call/Webcast Deta Oct 17 2016 
Pengrowth Announces a 63 Percent Increase in Value of 2P Reserves at Lindbergh From $1.56 Billion to Oct 06 2016 
Pengrowth Receives Regulatory Approval for the 17,500 Barrel Per Day Second Commercial Phase of the May 30 2016 
Pengrowth Announces Release Date for Its 2016 First Quarter Results and Conference Call/Webcast Deta Apr 19 2016 
Pengrowth Energy Corporation and Frog Lake Energy Resources Corp Enter Into a Sale Leaseback Agreeme Apr 01 2016 
Pengrowth Announces Normal Course Issuer Bid for Convertible Debentures Feb 25 2016 
Pengrowth Energy to Release Fourth Quarter and Year End 2015 Operating and Reserve Results Feb 03 2016 
CORRECTION FROM SOURCE: Pengrowth Announces Prudent 2016 Capital Budget, Operational Update and Temp Jan 21 2016 
Pengrowth Announces Prudent 2016 Capital Budget, Operational Update and Temporary Suspension of Divi Jan 20 2016 
Pengrowth Receives Continued Listing Standard Notification from the New York Stock Exchange Regardin Oct 29 2015 

More From Other Websites
Pengrowth Energy Corp. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : PGH-US : May 17,... May 17 2017
Pengrowth Receives Continued Listing Standard Notification from the New York Stock Exchange May 16 2017
ETFs with exposure to Pengrowth Energy Corp. : May 8, 2017 May 08 2017
Oil and Gas Stock Roundup: Crashing Crude and Lackluster Earnings Drive Oil Stocks Lower May 06 2017
Pengrowth Energy Corp. :PGH-US: Earnings Analysis: Q1, 2017 By the Numbers : May 5, 2017 May 05 2017
Pengrowth Delivers Transformational Debt Reduction in First Quarter Driven by Asset Sales May 02 2017
4 Oil Stocks I’d Avoid at All Costs Apr 29 2017
ETFs with exposure to Pengrowth Energy Corp. : April 27, 2017 Apr 27 2017
Pengrowth Enters Into Agreement to Sell Remaining Swan Hills Assets for $185 Million Apr 25 2017
Pengrowth Announces Closing of $92 Million Bernadet Montney Asset Sale Apr 11 2017
Pengrowth Reduces Indebtedness by CDN $530 Million Following Prepayment of US $300 Million of Notes... Apr 03 2017
Pengrowth Announces Sale of Bernadet Montney Lands for $92 Million Mar 23 2017
Pengrowth Reaches Agreement to Sell North Central Alberta Properties for $180 Million Mar 20 2017
Pengrowth Energy Corp. :PGH-US: Earnings Analysis: Q4, 2016 By the Numbers : March 16, 2017 Mar 16 2017
Pengrowth Energy reports 4Q loss Feb 28 2017
Pengrowth Delivers Strong Operational Performance in 2016; Company on Track to Substantially Reduce... Feb 28 2017
2 Stocks to Avoid (and 1 to Buy) Feb 21 2017
Pengrowth Announces Plan to Reduce Outstanding Debt by $530MM Through Retirement of $127MM of... Feb 21 2017
Pengrowth Announces Release Date for Its 2016 Fourth Quarter Results and Conference Call/Webcast... Feb 09 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}