Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 3/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.07
QTM's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
96% of the 2289 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 1.44 vs. QTM: 0.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
QTM' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.07  Med: 0.81 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.07
Equity-to-Asset -0.55
QTM's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
99% of the 2257 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 0.57 vs. QTM: -0.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
QTM' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.62  Med: 0.39 Max: 0.81
Current: -0.55
-0.62
0.81
Debt-to-Equity -1.04
QTM's Debt-to-Equity is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 1772 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 0.33 vs. QTM: -1.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-Equity only.
QTM' s Debt-to-Equity Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.88  Med: 0.45 Max: 2.42
Current: -1.04
-4.88
2.42
Debt-to-EBITDA 7.16
QTM's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
86% of the 1613 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 2.01 vs. QTM: 7.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-EBITDA only.
QTM' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.08  Med: 3.73 Max: 22.36
Current: 7.16
-12.08
22.36
Interest Coverage 1.25
QTM's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
95% of the 1868 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 56.05 vs. QTM: 1.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
QTM' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.44  Med: 1.23 Max: 1.56
Current: 1.25
0.44
1.56
Piotroski F-Score: 6
Altman Z-Score: -1.29
Beneish M-Score: -0.65
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 2.22
QTM's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
63% of the 2270 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 4.35 vs. QTM: 2.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
QTM' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -40.78  Med: -0.05 Max: 4.3
Current: 2.22
-40.78
4.3
Net Margin % 0.64
QTM's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
69% of the 2269 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 3.34 vs. QTM: 0.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
QTM' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -44.29  Med: -2.65 Max: 3.09
Current: 0.64
-44.29
3.09
ROA % 1.48
QTM's ROA % is ranked lower than
64% of the 2298 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 3.17 vs. QTM: 1.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
QTM' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -44.36  Med: -3.87 Max: 4.75
Current: 1.48
-44.36
4.75
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 81.73
QTM's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
95% of the 2289 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 11.99 vs. QTM: 81.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
QTM' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -460.4  Med: 0.64 Max: 169.18
Current: 81.73
-460.4
169.18
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -6.10
QTM's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
73% of the 2115 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 1.80 vs. QTM: -6.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
QTM' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -14.4 Max: 4.8
Current: -6.1
0
4.8
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 22.00
QTM's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
75% of the 1821 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 6.30 vs. QTM: 22.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
QTM' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -43.1 Max: 49.2
Current: 22
0
49.2
GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with Quantum Corp $QTM.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» QTM's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-10-26)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2016

QTM Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Joel Greenblatt 26,228 sh (New)
Jim Simons 5,465,055 sh (+2.45%)
Paul Tudor Jones 44,403 sh (unchged)
Private Capital 14,384,843 sh (-1.43%)
George Soros 11,932,860 sh (-5.79%)
» More
Q4 2016

QTM Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Jim Simons 6,330,952 sh (+15.84%)
Joel Greenblatt 30,002 sh (+14.39%)
Paul Tudor Jones 44,403 sh (unchged)
Private Capital 13,311,187 sh (-7.46%)
George Soros 10,072,566 sh (-15.59%)
» More
Q1 2017

QTM Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Jim Simons 8,026,252 sh (+26.78%)
Joel Greenblatt 34,993 sh (+16.64%)
Paul Tudor Jones 44,403 sh (unchged)
Private Capital 13,224,747 sh (-0.65%)
George Soros 9,508,773 sh (-5.60%)
» More
Q2 2017

QTM Guru Trades in Q2 2017

Chuck Royce 13,003 sh (New)
Jim Simons 1,059,641 sh (+5.62%)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Private Capital 1,634,790 sh (-1.11%)
George Soros 686,666 sh (-42.23%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with QTM

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
Private Capital 2017-06-30 Reduce -1.11%0.02%$6.46 - $8.97 $ 5.86-24%1,634,790
George Soros 2017-06-30 Reduce -42.23%0.1%$6.46 - $8.97 $ 5.86-24%686,666
Joel Greenblatt 2017-06-30 Sold Out $6.46 - $8.97 $ 5.86-24%0
Private Capital 2017-03-31 Reduce -0.65%0.01%$6.61 - $7.65 $ 5.86-18%1,653,093
George Soros 2017-03-31 Reduce -5.60%0.02%$6.61 - $7.65 $ 5.86-18%1,188,597
Joel Greenblatt 2017-03-31 Add 16.64%$6.61 - $7.65 $ 5.86-18%4,374
Private Capital 2016-12-31 Reduce -7.46%0.12%$5.44 - $7.67 $ 5.86-11%1,663,898
George Soros 2016-12-31 Reduce -15.59%0.05%$5.44 - $7.67 $ 5.86-11%1,259,071
Joel Greenblatt 2016-12-31 Add 14.39%$5.44 - $7.67 $ 5.86-11%3,750
Private Capital 2016-11-21 Reduce -0.26%0.01%Premium Member Access $7.38 $ 5.86-21%1,793,474
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!
Premium More recent guru trades are included for USA Subscribe Members only!!
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Computer Hardware » Data Storage    NAICS: 334112    SIC: 3572
Compare:TPE:4977, XKRX:005070, TPE:8215, TPE:2323, TSE:6834, OSL:THIN, TPE:2349, TPE:2495, TPE:6145, TSE:6916, ROCO:6179, TPE:3054, ROCO:3217, TPE:3057, ROCO:3693, XKLS:0176, ROCO:6188, XKRX:196450, ROCO:6199, SGX:BKW » details
Traded in other countries:QNT2.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Quantum Corp provides storage, archive and data protection solutions for capturing, sharing, and preserving digital assets over the entire data lifecycle.

Quantum Corp provides storage, archive and data protection solutions for capturing, sharing, and preserving digital assets over the entire data lifecycle.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 73.27
QTM's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
90% of the 1672 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 20.94 vs. QTM: 73.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
QTM' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 24.78  Med: 106 Max: 430
Current: 73.27
24.78
430
Forward PE Ratio 11.74
QTM's Forward PE Ratio is ranked higher than
80% of the 140 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 16.64 vs. QTM: 11.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 73.27
QTM's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
90% of the 1672 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 20.96 vs. QTM: 73.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
QTM' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 24.71  Med: 106 Max: 430
Current: 73.27
24.71
430
PS Ratio 0.39
QTM's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
81% of the 2236 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 1.12 vs. QTM: 0.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
QTM' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.03  Med: 0.54 Max: 1.44
Current: 0.39
0.03
1.44
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 58.60
QTM's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
87% of the 848 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 17.85 vs. QTM: 58.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
QTM' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.35  Med: 13.05 Max: 186.07
Current: 58.6
0.35
186.07
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 42.16
QTM's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
88% of the 1108 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 12.08 vs. QTM: 42.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
QTM' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.31  Med: 10.77 Max: 88.56
Current: 42.16
0.31
88.56
EV-to-EBIT 27.05
QTM's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
70% of the 1748 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 16.50 vs. QTM: 27.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
QTM' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -505.8  Med: -1.6 Max: 3771.5
Current: 27.05
-505.8
3771.5
EV-to-EBITDA 18.41
QTM's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
67% of the 1855 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 11.95 vs. QTM: 18.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
QTM' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -51.5  Med: 13.3 Max: 871.6
Current: 18.41
-51.5
871.6
EV-to-Revenue 0.62
QTM's EV-to-Revenue is ranked higher than
70% of the 2229 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 1.12 vs. QTM: 0.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
QTM' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.4  Med: 0.8 Max: 1.8
Current: 0.62
0.4
1.8
Current Ratio 0.78
QTM's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
96% of the 2222 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 1.95 vs. QTM: 0.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
QTM' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.78  Med: 1.95 Max: 5.42
Current: 0.78
0.78
5.42
Quick Ratio 0.57
QTM's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
94% of the 2222 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 1.44 vs. QTM: 0.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
QTM' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.57  Med: 1.58 Max: 5.03
Current: 0.57
0.57
5.03
Days Inventory 64.76
QTM's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
56% of the 2208 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 72.25 vs. QTM: 64.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
QTM' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 46.46  Med: 89.12 Max: 105.28
Current: 64.76
46.46
105.28
Days Sales Outstanding 78.94
QTM's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
55% of the 1906 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 74.46 vs. QTM: 78.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
QTM' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 48.66  Med: 64.73 Max: 83.82
Current: 78.94
48.66
83.82
Days Payable 56.15
QTM's Days Payable is ranked lower than
54% of the 1836 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 60.11 vs. QTM: 56.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
QTM' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 32.68  Med: 51.79 Max: 64.41
Current: 56.15
32.68
64.41

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -2.90
QTM's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
50% of the 1446 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: -2.80 vs. QTM: -2.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
QTM' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -21.5  Med: -3.1 Max: 0
Current: -2.9
-21.5
0

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.74
QTM's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
85% of the 2022 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 1.17 vs. QTM: 0.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
QTM' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.16  Med: 1.15 Max: 3.06
Current: 0.74
0.16
3.06
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 3.70
QTM's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
53% of the 2295 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 4.04 vs. QTM: 3.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
QTM' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -83.2  Med: -0.5 Max: 7.1
Current: 3.7
-83.2
7.1
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 10.02
QTM's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
54% of the 1238 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 8.17 vs. QTM: 10.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
QTM' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -10.8  Med: 1.4 Max: 41.9
Current: 10.02
-10.8
41.9

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $505.92
EPS (TTM) $ 0.08
Beta2.92
Short Percentage of Float3.02%
52-Week Range $4.86 - 9.20
Shares Outstanding (Mil)34.47

Analyst Estimate

Mar18 Mar19
Revenue (Mil $) 520 536
EPS ($) 0.50 0.91
EPS without NRI ($) 0.50 0.91
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($)

Piotroski F-Score Details

Piotroski F-Score: 66
Positive ROAY
Positive CFROAY
Higher ROA yoyY
CFROA > ROAY
Lower Leverage yoyY
Higher Current Ratio yoyN
Less Shares Outstanding yoyN
Higher Gross Margin yoyN
Higher Asset Turnover yoyY

» More Articles for QTM

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}