Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 3/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.07
QTM's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
95% of the 2321 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 1.37 vs. QTM: 0.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
QTM' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.07  Med: 0.78 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.07
0.07
No Debt
Equity-to-Asset -0.59
QTM's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
99% of the 2283 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 0.56 vs. QTM: -0.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
QTM' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.62  Med: 0.39 Max: 0.81
Current: -0.59
-0.62
0.81
Debt-to-Equity -1.03
QTM's Debt-to-Equity is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 1812 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 0.34 vs. QTM: -1.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-Equity only.
QTM' s Debt-to-Equity Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.88  Med: 0.43 Max: 2.42
Current: -1.03
-4.88
2.42
Debt-to-EBITDA 18.18
QTM's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
96% of the 1623 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 2.04 vs. QTM: 18.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-EBITDA only.
QTM' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.08  Med: 3.73 Max: 22.36
Current: 18.18
-12.08
22.36
Interest Coverage 0.11
QTM's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
100% of the 1899 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 59.34 vs. QTM: 0.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
QTM' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.11  Med: 1.23 Max: 1.56
Current: 0.11
0.11
1.56
Piotroski F-Score: 5
Altman Z-Score: -1.74
Beneish M-Score: -0.95
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 3/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 0.23
QTM's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
74% of the 2300 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 4.45 vs. QTM: 0.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
QTM' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -40.78  Med: -0.05 Max: 4.3
Current: 0.23
-40.78
4.3
Net Margin % -1.77
QTM's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
78% of the 2299 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 3.46 vs. QTM: -1.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
QTM' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -44.29  Med: -2.65 Max: 3.09
Current: -1.77
-44.29
3.09
ROA % -3.84
QTM's ROA % is ranked lower than
82% of the 2327 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 3.43 vs. QTM: -3.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
QTM' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -44.36  Med: -3.87 Max: 4.75
Current: -3.84
-44.36
4.75
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 11.40
QTM's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
52% of the 2318 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 12.27 vs. QTM: 11.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
QTM' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -460.4  Med: 0.64 Max: 169.18
Current: 11.4
-460.4
169.18
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -6.10
QTM's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
73% of the 2116 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 1.90 vs. QTM: -6.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
QTM' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -14.4 Max: 4.8
Current: -6.1
0
4.8
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 22.00
QTM's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
74% of the 1831 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 6.30 vs. QTM: 22.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
QTM' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -43.1 Max: 49.2
Current: 22
0
49.2
GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with Quantum Corp QTM.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» QTM's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2018-05-10)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2017

QTM Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Jim Simons 8,026,252 sh (+26.78%)
Joel Greenblatt 34,993 sh (+16.64%)
Paul Tudor Jones 44,403 sh (unchged)
Private Capital 13,224,747 sh (-0.65%)
George Soros 9,508,773 sh (-5.60%)
» More
Q2 2017

QTM Guru Trades in Q2 2017

Chuck Royce 13,003 sh (New)
Jim Simons 1,059,641 sh (+5.62%)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Private Capital 1,634,790 sh (-1.11%)
George Soros 686,666 sh (-42.23%)
» More
Q3 2017

QTM Guru Trades in Q3 2017

Chuck Royce 18,003 sh (+38.45%)
Jim Simons 1,067,471 sh (+0.74%)
George Soros Sold Out
Private Capital 1,558,016 sh (-4.70%)
» More
Q4 2017

QTM Guru Trades in Q4 2017

Chuck Royce Sold Out
Jim Simons 747,771 sh (-29.95%)
Private Capital 408,709 sh (-73.77%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Business Description

Industry: Computer Hardware » Data Storage    NAICS: 334112    SIC: 3572
Compare:XKRX:005070, TPE:8215, TPE:4977, TSE:6834, ROCO:6188, TPE:6145, TPE:2495, TSE:6916, TPE:2323, TPE:2349, OSL:THIN, ROCO:6179, ROCO:3217, XKRX:196450, TPE:3054, XKLS:0176, ROCO:6485, SGX:BKW, TPE:3057, ROCO:3693 » details
Traded in other countries:QNT2.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Quantum Corp provides storage, archive and data protection solutions for capturing, sharing, and preserving digital assets over the entire data lifecycle.

Quantum Corp provides storage, archive and data protection solutions for capturing, sharing, and preserving digital assets over the entire data lifecycle.

Top Ranked Articles about Quantum Corp

QUANTUM CORPORATION SHAREHOLDER ALERT BY FORMER LOUISIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL: KAHN SWICK & FOTI, LLC REMINDS INVESTORS WITH LOSSES IN EXCESS OF $100,000 of Lead Plaintiff Deadline in Class Action Lawsuit Against Quantum Corporation - QTM
Quantum Receives NYSE Notification Related to Late Filing of Form 10-Q
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Brower Piven Notifies Investors of Class Action Lawsuit And Encourages Those Who Have Losses In Excess Of $100,000 From Investment In Quantum Corporation (NYSE: QTM) To Contact Brower Piven Before The Lead Plaintiff Deadline
Scott+Scott, Attorneys at Law, LLP Alerts Investors to the Filing of Securities Class Actions Against Quantum Corporation (QTM)
Federman & Sherwood Announces Filing of Securities Class Action Lawsuit Against Quantum Corporation
QUANTUM INVESTOR ALERT: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses Exceeding $100,000 Investing In Quantum Corporation To Contact The Firm
Block & Leviton Files Class Action Against Quantum Corporation For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Pomerantz Law Firm Announces the Filing of a Class Action against Quantum Corporation and Certain Officers – QTM
Block & Leviton Files Class Action Against Quantum Corporation For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Investor Alert: Kaplan Fox Announces Investigation Of Quantum Corporation

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward PE Ratio 3.23
QTM's Forward PE Ratio is ranked higher than
99% of the 130 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 16.00 vs. QTM: 3.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PS Ratio 0.30
QTM's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
88% of the 2263 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 1.11 vs. QTM: 0.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
QTM' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.03  Med: 0.54 Max: 1.44
Current: 0.3
0.03
1.44
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 29.93
QTM's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
67% of the 840 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 18.87 vs. QTM: 29.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
QTM' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.35  Med: 14.03 Max: 186.07
Current: 29.93
0.35
186.07
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 22.09
QTM's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
75% of the 1092 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 12.79 vs. QTM: 22.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
QTM' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.31  Med: 11.05 Max: 88.56
Current: 22.09
0.31
88.56
EV-to-EBIT 161.49
QTM's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
97% of the 1768 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 15.66 vs. QTM: 161.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
QTM' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -505.8  Med: -1.5 Max: 3771.5
Current: 161.49
-505.8
3771.5
EV-to-EBITDA 36.77
QTM's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
88% of the 1883 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 12.04 vs. QTM: 36.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
QTM' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -51.5  Med: 13.4 Max: 871.6
Current: 36.77
-51.5
871.6
EV-to-Revenue 0.55
QTM's EV-to-Revenue is ranked higher than
76% of the 2258 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 1.13 vs. QTM: 0.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
QTM' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.4  Med: 0.8 Max: 1.8
Current: 0.55
0.4
1.8
Current Ratio 0.78
QTM's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
96% of the 2275 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 1.95 vs. QTM: 0.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
QTM' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.78  Med: 1.94 Max: 5.42
Current: 0.78
0.78
5.42
Quick Ratio 0.56
QTM's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
94% of the 2275 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 1.44 vs. QTM: 0.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
QTM' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.56  Med: 1.57 Max: 5.03
Current: 0.56
0.56
5.03
Days Inventory 66.44
QTM's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
54% of the 2241 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 72.37 vs. QTM: 66.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
QTM' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 46.46  Med: 89.12 Max: 105.28
Current: 66.44
46.46
105.28
Days Sales Outstanding 80.73
QTM's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
53% of the 1919 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 76.01 vs. QTM: 80.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
QTM' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 48.66  Med: 64.73 Max: 83.82
Current: 80.73
48.66
83.82
Days Payable 63.99
QTM's Days Payable is ranked higher than
50% of the 1832 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 63.85 vs. QTM: 63.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
QTM' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 32.68  Med: 51.79 Max: 64.41
Current: 63.99
32.68
64.41

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -2.90
QTM's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
50% of the 1430 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: -2.90 vs. QTM: -2.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
QTM' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -21.5  Med: -3.1 Max: 0
Current: -2.9
-21.5
0

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.54
QTM's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
91% of the 1995 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 1.08 vs. QTM: 0.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
QTM' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.16  Med: 1.14 Max: 3.06
Current: 0.54
0.16
3.06
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 0.61
QTM's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
74% of the 2322 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 4.54 vs. QTM: 0.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
QTM' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -83.2  Med: -0.3 Max: 7.1
Current: 0.61
-83.2
7.1
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 12.52
QTM's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
60% of the 1264 Companies
in the Global Data Storage industry.

( Industry Median: 8.73 vs. QTM: 12.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
QTM' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -10.8  Med: 1.4 Max: 41.9
Current: 12.52
-10.8
41.9

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $478.23
EPS (TTM) $ -0.23
Beta2.66
Short Percentage of Float5.20%
52-Week Range $3.42 - 9.20
Shares Outstanding (Mil)34.67

Analyst Estimate

Mar18 Mar19
Revenue (Mil $) 471 501
EBIT (Mil $) 20 56
EBITDA (Mil $)
EPS ($) 0.30 1.25
EPS without NRI ($) 0.30 1.25
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($)

Piotroski F-Score Details

Piotroski F-Score: 55
Positive ROAN
Positive CFROAY
Higher ROA yoyY
CFROA > ROAY
Lower Leverage yoyY
Higher Current Ratio yoyN
Less Shares Outstanding yoyN
Higher Gross Margin yoyN
Higher Asset Turnover yoyY

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}