Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany, Mexico

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.10
NYSE:RH's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
87% of the 940 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 0.95 vs. NYSE:RH: 0.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
NYSE:RH' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.09 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.1
Equity-to-Asset 0.32
NYSE:RH's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
76% of the 929 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 0.49 vs. NYSE:RH: 0.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
NYSE:RH' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.06  Med: 0.38 Max: 0.57
Current: 0.32
0.06
0.57
Interest Coverage 1.47
NYSE:RH's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
91% of the 795 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 28.32 vs. NYSE:RH: 1.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NYSE:RH' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.12  Med: 5.08 Max: 9.54
Current: 1.47
1.12
9.54
Piotroski F-Score: 4
Altman Z-Score: 2.21
Beneish M-Score: -2.97
WACC vs ROIC
8.89%
3.19%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 3.19
NYSE:RH's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
53% of the 941 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 3.50 vs. NYSE:RH: 3.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
NYSE:RH' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.97  Med: 1.99 Max: 8.87
Current: 3.19
-5.97
8.87
Net Margin % 0.69
NYSE:RH's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
67% of the 942 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 2.26 vs. NYSE:RH: 0.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
NYSE:RH' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -7.19  Med: 0.36 Max: 4.87
Current: 0.69
-7.19
4.87
ROE % 1.84
NYSE:RH's ROE % is ranked lower than
67% of the 923 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 6.44 vs. NYSE:RH: 1.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
NYSE:RH' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -76.41  Med: 2.13 Max: 14.58
Current: 1.84
-76.41
14.58
ROA % 0.74
NYSE:RH's ROA % is ranked lower than
67% of the 947 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 2.82 vs. NYSE:RH: 0.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NYSE:RH' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -15.76  Med: 0.68 Max: 7.13
Current: 0.74
-15.76
7.13
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 6.56
NYSE:RH's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
64% of the 944 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 12.91 vs. NYSE:RH: 6.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NYSE:RH' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -22.29  Med: 5.52 Max: 27.18
Current: 6.56
-22.29
27.18
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 10.80
NYSE:RH's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
81% of the 794 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 1.20 vs. NYSE:RH: 10.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
NYSE:RH' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -26.7  Med: 2.55 Max: 98.8
Current: 10.8
-26.7
98.8
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 10.60
NYSE:RH's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
69% of the 684 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 1.50 vs. NYSE:RH: 10.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
NYSE:RH' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 3.15 Max: 46.3
Current: 10.6
0
46.3
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -33.90
NYSE:RH's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
87% of the 606 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 0.50 vs. NYSE:RH: -33.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
NYSE:RH' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -24.5 Max: 96.1
Current: -33.9
0
96.1
GuruFocus has detected 2 Warning Signs with RH $NYSE:RH.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NYSE:RH's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-12-08 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2016

RH Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Steven Cohen 1,163,900 sh (New)
Chuck Royce 284,938 sh (+12.87%)
Paul Tudor Jones 18,219 sh (+12.74%)
Caxton Associates 100,000 sh (unchged)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 1,850,931 sh (-0.53%)
» More
Q4 2016

RH Guru Trades in Q4 2016

First Eagle Investment 44,900 sh (New)
Chuck Royce 369,438 sh (+29.66%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 2,009,451 sh (+8.56%)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Steven Cohen 150,000 sh (-87.11%)
» More
Q1 2017

RH Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Paul Tudor Jones 7,067 sh (New)
First Eagle Investment 63,200 sh (+40.76%)
Chuck Royce 369,213 sh (-0.06%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 1,941,879 sh (-3.36%)
Steven Cohen 24,400 sh (-83.73%)
» More
Q2 2017

RH Guru Trades in Q2 2017

Joel Greenblatt 10,929 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 28,765 sh (+307.03%)
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Chuck Royce Sold Out
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss Sold Out
First Eagle Investment 54,500 sh (-13.77%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with RH

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
First Eagle Investment 2017-06-30 Reduce -13.77%$42.54 - $65.3 $ 49.65-6%54,500
Joel Greenblatt 2017-06-30 New Buy0.01%$42.54 - $65.3 $ 49.65-6%10,929
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 2017-06-30 Sold Out 0.14%$42.54 - $65.3 $ 49.65-6%0
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 2017-03-31 Reduce -3.36%$25.08 - $46.26 $ 49.6561%1,941,879
First Eagle Investment 2017-03-31 Add 40.76%$25.08 - $46.26 $ 49.6561%63,200
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 2016-12-31 Add 8.56%0.01%$27.95 - $38.99 $ 49.6554%2,009,451
First Eagle Investment 2016-12-31 New Buy$27.95 - $38.99 $ 49.6554%44,900
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 2016-09-30 Reduce -0.53%$27.5 - $36.38 $ 49.6556%1,850,931
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!
Premium More recent guru trades are included for USA Subscribe Members only!!
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Retail - Apparel & Specialty » Specialty Retail    NAICS: 442299    SIC: 5712
Compare:NYSE:HOME, NYSE:APRN, NYSE:SYX, NYSE:PRTY, NAS:CONN, NYSE:MED, NAS:FLWS, NAS:FINL, NAS:WINA, NYSE:BKS, NAS:OSTK, NYSE:XOXO, NAS:ETSY, NAS:LE, NAS:HSNI, NAS:FTD, NYSE:PIR, NYSE:HZO, NAS:WMAR, NYSE:BNED » details
Traded in other countries:RS1.Germany, RH.Mexico,
Headquarter Location:USA
RH, formerly Restoration Hardware Holdings Inc is a luxury brand in the home furnishings marketplace offering furniture, lighting, textiles, outdoor and garden products. It offers collections through its retail galleries, source books and websites.

RH is a luxury retailer operating in the $109 billion home furnishing industry. The company offers merchandise across many categories including furniture, lighting, textiles, bath, decor, children, and more. RH innovates, curates, and integrates products, categories, services, and businesses across channels and brand extensions (RH Teen, RH Modern, and Waterworks, for example). The firm is fully integrated across store, Web, and catalog channels, with around half of sales from the direct-to-consumer channel.

Top Ranked Articles about RH

RH 72 HOUR DEADLINE ALERT: APPROXIMATELY 72 HOURS REMAIN; FORMER LOUISIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL AND KAHN SWICK & FOTI, LLC REMIND INVESTORS of Deadline in Class Action Lawsuit Against RH – (RH)
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Reminds Shareholders with Losses on their Investment in RH of Class Action Lawsuit and Upcoming Deadline – RH
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Reminds Shareholders of RH (formerly Restoration Hardware) of a Class Action Lawsuit and a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of April 3, 2017 - RH
DEADLINE ALERT: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against RH (RH) & Lead Plaintiff Deadline - April 3, 2017

NEW YORK, March 30, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Attorney Advertising -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC reminds investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against RH (formerly Restoration Hardware Holdings, Inc.) (“RH” or the “Company”) (:RH) and certain of its officers, on behalf of a class who purchased RH securities between March 26, 2015 and June 8, 2016, inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: www.bgandg.com/rh. This class action seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made false and misleading statements, specifically its earnings forecasts based on a new product line, RH Modern. The complaint further alleges that RH misrepresented and concealed problems surrounding the launch of RH Modern, including inventory shortages, shipping delays and poor construction quality. On June 8, 2016, RH revealed its financial and operating results for the first quarter of 2016 and significantly lessened its earnings guidance for fiscal year 2016, noting “accommodations largely due to . . . production delays” in RH’s new product line, RH Modern, which the Company had previously touted as “the most important and significant new home furnishings business to be launched in the last 15 or 20 years.”  Following this news, RH stock dropped $7.66, or 21.24%, to close at $28.41 on June 9, 2016. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint you can visit the firm’s site: www.bgandg.com/rh or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Investor Relations Analyst, Yael Hurwitz of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 212-697-6484. If you suffered a loss in RH you have until April 3, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff.  Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a corporate litigation boutique.  Our primary expertise is the aggressive pursuit of litigation claims on behalf of our clients.  In addition to representing institutions and other investor plaintiffs in class action security litigation, the firm’s expertise includes general corporate and commercial litigation, as well as securities arbitration.   Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Contact:
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Peretz Bronstein or Yael Hurwitz
212-697-6484 | [email protected]

Read more...
DEADLINE ALERT: Brower Piven Alerts Shareholders Of Approaching Deadline In Class Action Lawsuit And Encourages Those With Losses In Excess Of $100,000 From Investment In RH To Contact The Firm

STEVENSON, Md., March 29, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The securities litigation law firm of Brower Piven, A Professional Corporation, announces that a class action lawsuit has been commenced in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of purchasers of RH (formerly known as Restoration Hardware Holdings, Inc.) (:RH) (“RH” or the “Company”) common stock during the period between March 26, 2016 and June 8, 2016, inclusive (the “Class Period”).  Investors who wish to become proactively involved in the litigation have until April 3, 2017 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff.
If you wish to choose counsel to represent you and the Class, you must apply to be appointed lead plaintiff and be selected by the Court.  The lead plaintiff will direct the litigation and participate in important decisions including whether to accept a settlement for the Class in the action.  The lead plaintiff will be selected from among applicants claiming the largest loss from investment in RH common stock during the Class Period.  Members of the Class will be represented by the lead plaintiff and counsel chosen by the lead plaintiff.  No class has yet been certified in the above action. The complaint accuses the defendants of violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by virtue of the defendants’ failure to disclose during the Class Period that RH had inadequate inventory and was unprepared to launch RH Modern. According to the complaint, following a December 10, 2015 announcement of missing its earnings projection, a February 24, 2016 announcement of disappointing earnings due to higher cancellation rates and shipping delays, and a June 8, 2016 announcement that the Company was lowering its earnings guidance due to RH Modern production delays, the value of RH shares declined significantly. If you have suffered a loss in excess of $100,000 from investment in RH common stock purchased on or after March 26, 2016 and held through the revelation of negative information during and/or at the end of the Class Period and would like to learn more about this lawsuit and your ability to participate as a lead plaintiff, without cost or obligation to you, please visit our website at http://www.browerpiven.com/currentsecuritiescases.html.  You may also request more information by contacting Brower Piven either by email at [email protected] or by telephone at (410) 415-6616.  Brower Piven also encourages anyone with information regarding the Company’s conduct during the period in question to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others. Attorneys at Brower Piven have extensive experience in litigating securities and other class action cases and have been advocating for the rights of shareholders since the 1980s.  If you choose to retain counsel, you may retain Brower Piven without financial obligation or cost to you, or you may retain other counsel of your choice.  You need take no action at this time to be a member of the class.
CONTACT: Charles J. Piven
Brower Piven, A Professional Corporation
1925 Old Valley Road
Stevenson, Maryland 21153
Telephone: 410-415-6616
[email protected]

Read more...
RH INVESTOR ALERT: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong Reminds Investors of a Class Action Involving RH (formerly Restoration Hardware) and a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of April 3, 2017

NEW YORK, March 24, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that a class action lawsuit has been commenced in the USDC for the Northern District of California on behalf of investors who purchased RH (formerly known as Restoration Hardware) (“RH”) (:RH) securities between March 26, 2015 to June 8, 2016.
Click here to learn about the case: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra/rh. There is no cost or obligation to you. According to the complaint, during the Class Period, RH reported false and misleading earnings forecasts based on its new product line, RH Modern. The complaint further alleges that RH misrepresented and concealed problems surrounding the launch of RH Modern, including inventory shortages, shipping delays, and poor construction quality. On June 8, 2016, RH released its first quarter 2016 financial results. Chairman and CEO Gary Friedman noted that the results were impacted partly by “the costs associated with RH Modern production delays and investments to elevate the customer experience…” Upon this news, shares of RH fell from a close of $36.07 per share on June 8, 2016, to a close of $28.41 per share the following day. If you suffered a loss in RH you have until April 3, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. To obtain additional information, contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email [email protected], by telephone at 212.425.1140, or visit http://www.wongesq.com/pslra/rh. Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced attorney that has represented investors in securities litigations involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights.  Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
CONTACT:   
Vincent Wong, Esq.
39 East Broadway
Suite 304
New York, NY 10002
Tel. 212.425.1140
Fax. 866.699.3880
E-Mail: [email protected]

Read more...
SHAREHOLDER ALERT:  Pomerantz Law Firm Announces the Filing of a Class Action against RH and Certain Officers – RH

NEW YORK, March 16, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Pomerantz LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against RH (“RH” or the “Company”) (:RH) and certain of its officers.   The class action, filed in United States District Court, Northern District of California, and docketed under 17-cv-01425, is on behalf of a class consisting of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired RH securities between March 26, 2015 and June 8, 2016 both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), seeking to recover compensable damages caused by defendants’ violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
If you are a shareholder who purchased RH securities during the Class Period, you have until April 3, 2017 to ask the Court to appoint you as Lead Plaintiff for the class.  A copy of the Complaint can be obtained at www.pomerantzlaw.com.   To discuss this action, contact Robert S. Willoughby at [email protected] or 888.476.6529 (or 888.4-POMLAW), toll free, ext. 9980. Those who inquire by e-mail are encouraged to include their mailing address, telephone number, and number of shares purchased.  [Click here to join this class action] RH is a leading luxury retailer in the home furnishing marketplace.  The Company operates an integrated business with multiple channels of distribution including over 70 retail stores in the United States, source book magazines and websites.  In 2015, RH announced a new product line, RH Modern.  The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects.  Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:  (i) contrary to Defendants’ representations that the Company was prepared for the launch of RH Modern, that inventory was adequate, and that customers would not face shipping delays, in reality, the Company had severely inadequate inventory and was woefully unprepared to launch RH Modern; and (ii) as a result, RH’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. In early 2015, the Company’s core product line was facing headwinds as same store sales were decreasing. Specifically, in the RH’s earnings report for the first quarter of 2015, the Company announced its comparable store sales were down 9% from the previous quarter. To reinvigorate RH’s earnings, the Company began implementing its critical new product line, RH Modern. On June 11, 2015, the Company officially announced it would be releasing RH Modern later that fall. From the start of the Class Period, the Company touted its preparedness for the launch of RH Modern and increased its fiscal 2015 revenue guidance from $2.146 billion to $2.176 billion, representing growth in the range of 15% to 17% from the prior year. After raising its earnings-per-share (“EPS”) guidance to $2.95 to $3.10 for fiscal 2015 the previous quarter, the Company again raised its earnings guidance to a range of $3.02 to $3.15, representing growth in the range of 28% to 33% year-over-year. RH attributed the growth in revenue and earnings, in large part, to the release of RH Modern. In the months leading up to the release of RH Modern, the Company continued to tout the new product line, including the Company’s ability to have the new RH Modern products in-stock so that customers would receive furniture they ordered in a timely manner. In truth, the Company was woefully unprepared to launch RH Modern and to capitalize on the new product line. In December 2015, when RH Modern inventory problems began to emerge, the Company repeatedly downplayed the significance of the problems related to RH Modern, preventing investors from learning the full truth. On December 10, 2015, the Company announced it had missed its earnings projections due, in part, to the fact that RH Modern furniture was not fully in-stock.  On this news, RH’s share price fell $8.94 or 10.20% over two trading days, to close at $78.65 on December 14, 2015.  On February 9, 2016, the Company announced the surprise resignation of its Chief Operating Officer, Kenneth Dunaj, who just one year prior had been put in charge of inventory management. On February 24, 2016, the Company announced disappointing earnings for the fourth quarter of 2015 due to shipping delays of the RH Modern furniture. On this news, RH’s share fell $13.43, or 25.86%, to close at $38.49 on February 25, 2016.  On June 8, 2016, RH announced the Company’s financial and operating results for the first quarter of 2016 and significantly reduced its earnings guidance for fiscal year 2016, citing “accommodations largely due to . . . production delays” in RH’s new product line, RH Modern, which the Company had previously touted as “the most important and significant new home furnishings business to be launched in the last 15 or 20 years.”  On this news, RH’s share price fell $7.66, or 21.24%, to close at $28.41 on June 9, 2016. The Pomerantz Firm, with offices in New York, Chicago, Florida, and Los Angeles, is acknowledged as one of the premier firms in the areas of corporate, securities, and antitrust class litigation. Founded by the late Abraham L. Pomerantz, known as the dean of the class action bar, the Pomerantz Firm pioneered the field of securities class actions. Today, more than 80 years later, the Pomerantz Firm continues in the tradition he established, fighting for the rights of the victims of securities fraud, breaches of fiduciary duty, and corporate misconduct. The Firm has recovered numerous multimillion-dollar damages awards on behalf of class members. See www.pomerantzlaw.com
CONTACT:
Robert S. Willoughby
Pomerantz LLP
[email protected]

Read more...
RH Investor Reminder: Hagens Berman Reminds Investors in RH, Inc. of the April 3, 2017 Lead Plaintiff Deadline

SAN FRANCISCO, March 03, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP reminds investors in RH, Inc. (:RH) of the April 3, 2017 Lead Plaintiff deadline in the pending securities class action.
If you purchased or otherwise acquired securities of RH between March 26, 2015 and June 8, 2016 (the “Class Period”) and suffered over $50,000 in losses contact Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP.  For more information visit: https://www.hbsslaw.com/cases/RH or contact Reed Kathrein, who is leading the firm’s investigation, by calling 510-725-3000 or emailing [email protected]. The complaint alleges that during the Class Period, RH reported false and misleading earnings forecasts based on its new product line, RH Modern.  The complaint further alleges that RH misrepresented and concealed problems surrounding the launch of RH Modern, including inventory shortages, shipping delays, and poor construction quality. On June 8, 2016, RH released its first quarter 2016 financial results.  Chairman and CEO Gary Friedman noted that the results were impacted partly by “the costs associated with RH Modern production delays and investments to elevate the customer experience…”  Upon this news, shares of RH fell from a close of $36.07 per share on June 8, 2016, to a close of $28.41 per share the following day. “Among other things, we’re concerned about RH’s apparent dependence on RH Modern for its future growth and statements to investors concerning RH’s supply chain and systems infrastructure,” said Hagens Berman partner Reed Kathrein. Whistleblowers: Persons with non-public information regarding RH should consider their options to help in the investigation or take advantage of the SEC Whistleblower program. Under the new SEC whistleblower program, whistleblowers who provide original information may receive rewards totaling up to 30 percent of any successful recovery made by the SEC. For more information, call Reed Kathrein at 510-725-3000 or email [email protected]. About Hagens Berman
Hagens Berman is a national investor-rights law firm headquartered in Seattle, Washington with offices in 10 cities. The Firm represents investors, whistleblowers, workers and consumers in complex litigation. More about the Firm and its successes can be found at www.hbsslaw.com. For the latest news visit our newsroom or follow us on Twitter at @classactionlaw.
Contact:
Reed Kathrein, 510-725-3000

Read more...
SHAREHOLDER ALERT - Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against RH (RH) & Lead Plaintiff Deadline: April 3, 2017

NEW YORK, Feb. 28, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Attorney Advertising -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC reminds investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against RH (formerly Restoration Hardware Holdings, Inc.) (“RH” or the “Company”) (NYSE:NYSE:RH) and certain of its officers, on behalf of a class who purchased RH securities between March 26, 2015 and June 8, 2016, inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: www.bgandg.com/rh. This class action seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made false and misleading statements, specifically its earnings forecasts based on a new product line, RH Modern. The complaint further alleges that RH misrepresented and concealed problems surrounding the launch of RH Modern, including inventory shortages, shipping delays and poor construction quality. On June 8, 2016, RH revealed its financial and operating results for the first quarter of 2016 and significantly lessened its earnings guidance for fiscal year 2016, noting “accommodations largely due to . . . production delays” in RH’s new product line, RH Modern, which the Company had previously touted as “the most important and significant new home furnishings business to be launched in the last 15 or 20 years.”  Following this news, RH stock dropped $7.66, or 21.24%, to close at $28.41 on June 9, 2016. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint you can visit the firm’s site: www.bgandg.com/rh or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Investor Relations Analyst, Yael Hurwitz of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 212-697-6484. If you suffered a loss in RH you have until April 3, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff.  Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a corporate litigation boutique.  Our primary expertise is the aggressive pursuit of litigation claims on behalf of our clients.  In addition to representing institutions and other investor plaintiffs in class action security litigation, the firm’s expertise includes general corporate and commercial litigation, as well as securities arbitration.   Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Contact:
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Peretz Bronstein or Yael Hurwitz
212-697-6484 | [email protected]

Read more...
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Brower Piven Encourages Investors Who Have Losses In Excess Of $100,000 From Investment In RH (RH) To Contact Brower Piven Before The Lead Plaintiff Deadline In Class Action Lawsuit

STEVENSON, Md., Feb. 27, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The securities litigation law firm of Brower Piven, A Professional Corporation, announces that a class action lawsuit has been commenced in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of purchasers of RH (formerly known as Restoration Hardware Holdings, Inc.) (NYSE:NYSE:RH) (“RH” or the “Company”) common stock during the period between March 26, 2016 and June 8, 2016, inclusive (the “Class Period”).  Investors who wish to become proactively involved in the litigation have until April 3, 2017 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff.
If you wish to choose counsel to represent you and the Class, you must apply to be appointed lead plaintiff and be selected by the Court.  The lead plaintiff will direct the litigation and participate in important decisions including whether to accept a settlement for the Class in the action.  The lead plaintiff will be selected from among applicants claiming the largest loss from investment in RH common stock during the Class Period.  Members of the Class will be represented by the lead plaintiff and counsel chosen by the lead plaintiff.  No class has yet been certified in the above action. The complaint accuses the defendants of violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by virtue of the defendants’ failure to disclose during the Class Period that RH had inadequate inventory and was unprepared to launch RH Modern. According to the complaint, following a December 10, 2015 announcement of missing its earnings projection, a February 24, 2016 announcement of disappointing earnings due to higher cancellation rates and shipping delays, and a June 8, 2016 announcement that the Company was lowering its earnings guidance due to RH Modern production delays, the value of RH shares declined significantly. If you have suffered a loss in excess of $100,000 from investment in RH common stock purchased on or after March 26, 2016 and held through the revelation of negative information during and/or at the end of the Class Period and would like to learn more about this lawsuit and your ability to participate as a lead plaintiff, without cost or obligation to you, please visit our website at http://www.browerpiven.com/currentsecuritiescases.html.  You may also request more information by contacting Brower Piven either by email at [email protected] or by telephone at (410) 415-6616.  Brower Piven also encourages anyone with information regarding the Company’s conduct during the period in question to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others. Attorneys at Brower Piven have extensive experience in litigating securities and other class action cases and have been advocating for the rights of shareholders since the 1980s. If you choose to retain counsel, you may retain Brower Piven without financial obligation or cost to you, or you may retain other counsel of your choice.  You need take no action at this time to be a member of the class.
CONTACT:  Charles J. Piven
Brower Piven, A Professional Corporation
1925 Old Valley Road
Stevenson, Maryland 21153
Telephone: 410-415-6616
[email protected]

Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 134.18
RH's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
96% of the 705 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 20.25 vs. RH: 134.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
RH' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 15.66  Med: 43.2 Max: 355.85
Current: 134.18
15.66
355.85
Forward PE Ratio 21.23
RH's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
86% of the 155 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 14.58 vs. RH: 21.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 134.18
RH's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
96% of the 708 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 20.25 vs. RH: 134.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
RH' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 15.66  Med: 43.2 Max: 355.85
Current: 134.18
15.66
355.85
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 15.34
RH's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked higher than
51% of the 433 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 20.35 vs. RH: 15.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
RH' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 13.15  Med: 80.72 Max: 201.5
Current: 15.34
13.15
201.5
PB Ratio 2.62
RH's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
75% of the 908 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 1.67 vs. RH: 2.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
RH' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.12  Med: 4.54 Max: 6.62
Current: 2.62
1.12
6.62
PS Ratio 0.89
RH's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
65% of the 913 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 0.70 vs. RH: 0.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
RH' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.49  Med: 1.73 Max: 2.38
Current: 0.89
0.49
2.38
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 11.46
RH's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
53% of the 381 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 15.71 vs. RH: 11.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
RH' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.84  Med: 13.19 Max: 17.13
Current: 11.46
9.84
17.13
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 6.70
RH's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
57% of the 474 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 10.26 vs. RH: 6.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
RH' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 35.57 Max: 187.33
Current: 6.7
0.01
187.33
EV-to-EBIT 23.99
RH's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
86% of the 737 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 14.76 vs. RH: 23.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
RH' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -44.2  Med: 21.1 Max: 66.4
Current: 23.99
-44.2
66.4
EV-to-EBITDA 13.20
RH's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
74% of the 779 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 11.75 vs. RH: 13.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
RH' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -74.4  Med: 16.7 Max: 44.7
Current: 13.2
-74.4
44.7
Shiller PE Ratio 0.03
RH's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
100% of the 255 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 18.75 vs. RH: 0.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
RH' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.04 Max: 0.06
Current: 0.03
0.01
0.06
Current Ratio 2.06
RH's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
63% of the 929 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 1.64 vs. RH: 2.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
RH' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.24  Med: 2.04 Max: 3.06
Current: 2.06
1.24
3.06
Quick Ratio 0.52
RH's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
71% of the 929 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 0.92 vs. RH: 0.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
RH' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.18  Med: 0.38 Max: 1.38
Current: 0.52
0.18
1.38
Days Inventory 181.83
RH's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
82% of the 884 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 90.95 vs. RH: 181.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
RH' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 129.44  Med: 147.18 Max: 185.34
Current: 181.83
129.44
185.34
Days Sales Outstanding 5.56
RH's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
72% of the 754 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 14.40 vs. RH: 5.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
RH' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.11  Med: 4.71 Max: 5.85
Current: 5.56
2.11
5.85
Days Payable 29.95
RH's Days Payable is ranked lower than
76% of the 701 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 50.04 vs. RH: 29.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
RH' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 28.78  Med: 39.37 Max: 42.7
Current: 29.95
28.78
42.7

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -0.30
RH's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
55% of the 505 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: -0.50 vs. RH: -0.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
RH' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -62.7  Med: -5.8 Max: 37.6
Current: -0.3
-62.7
37.6

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 4.72
RH's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
84% of the 839 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 1.94 vs. RH: 4.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
RH' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.71  Med: 6.09 Max: 8.04
Current: 4.72
1.71
8.04
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 4.46
RH's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
91% of the 523 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 1.25 vs. RH: 4.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
RH' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.56  Med: 12.22 Max: 61.83
Current: 4.46
2.56
61.83
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.51
RH's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
83% of the 830 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 1.06 vs. RH: 0.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
RH' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.3  Med: 1 Max: 1.24
Current: 0.51
0.3
1.24
Price-to-Graham-Number 5.30
RH's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked lower than
96% of the 612 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 1.49 vs. RH: 5.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
RH' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.02  Med: 3.44 Max: 6.17
Current: 5.3
0.02
6.17
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 4.15
RH's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
67% of the 952 Companies
in the Global Specialty Retail industry.

( Industry Median: 5.23 vs. RH: 4.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
RH' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.2  Med: 3.8 Max: 11.2
Current: 4.15
-5.2
11.2

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $2,241.50
EPS (TTM) $ 0.37
Beta1.62
Short Percentage of Float79.62%
52-Week Range $24.41 - 79.91
Shares Outstanding (Mil)21.12

Analyst Estimate

Jan18 Jan19 Jan20
Revenue (Mil $) 2,429 2,616 2,822
EPS ($) 2.33 3.74 4.00
EPS without NRI ($) 2.33 3.74 4.00
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
32.83%
Dividends per Share ($)
» More Articles for NYSE:RH

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Five Stocks You Might Want to Sell Jun 09 2017 
RH 72 HOUR DEADLINE ALERT: APPROXIMATELY 72 HOURS REMAIN; FORMER LOUISIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL AND KAHN Mar 31 2017 
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Reminds Shareholders with Losses on their Investment in RH of Mar 31 2017 
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Reminds Shareholders of RH (formerly Restoration Hardware) Mar 31 2017 
DEADLINE ALERT: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against RH (RH) Mar 30 2017 
DEADLINE ALERT: Brower Piven Alerts Shareholders Of Approaching Deadline In Class Action Lawsuit And Mar 29 2017 
RH INVESTOR ALERT: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong Reminds Investors of a Class Action Involving RH Mar 24 2017 
Missing Value in This Home and Décor Retailer Mar 19 2017 
SHAREHOLDER ALERT:  Pomerantz Law Firm Announces the Filing of a Class Action against RH and C Mar 16 2017 
RH Investor Reminder: Hagens Berman Reminds Investors in RH, Inc. of the April 3, 2017 Lead Plaintif Mar 03 2017 

More From Other Websites
RH – Value Analysis (NYSE:RH) : August 17, 2017 Aug 16 2017
See what the IHS Markit Score report has to say about RH. Aug 14 2017
[$$] Restoration Hardware’s Wild Ride to Nowhere Aug 11 2017
RH breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : RH-US : August 3, 2017 Aug 03 2017
Top Ranked Growth Stocks to Buy for August 2nd Aug 02 2017
Restoration Hardware Clutters Up Its Finances Jul 27 2017
RH and Ethan Allen: Cramer's Top Takeaways Jul 25 2017
Cramer Remix: The jig is up! Signs that US oil producers ... Jul 24 2017
Cramer Remix: The jig is up! Signs that US oil producers could be slowing down Jul 24 2017
Restoring A Hold On RH, Deutsche Bank Asks: Where Does The Stock Go From Here? Jul 21 2017
Restoration Hardware showroom property in Buckhead changes hands Jul 19 2017
Why Rite Aid, Novavax, and RH Jumped Today Jul 18 2017
A look into the $8.5 million Napa Valley home of Restorat... Jul 18 2017
Blue Apron Jumps To The Top Of Short-Seller Favorites List Jul 18 2017
Restoration Hardware Is Slaughtering the Bears -- Jim Cramer Reveals How Jul 18 2017
Jim Cramer on Restoration Hardware: This Is a Massive Short Squeeze Jul 18 2017
Cramer's Stop Trading: 'Battle royal' brewing at Restorat... Jul 18 2017
Oil downgrades, financials & retail in the blitz Jul 17 2017
What's Going On With RH? Jul 17 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}