Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 3/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.01
RLOG's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
98% of the 834 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 0.34 vs. RLOG: 0.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
RLOG' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.04 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.01
Equity-to-Asset 0.05
RLOG's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
97% of the 831 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 0.45 vs. RLOG: 0.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
RLOG' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.05  Med: 0.3 Max: 0.81
Current: 0.05
0.05
0.81
Debt-to-Equity 16.78
RLOG's Debt-to-Equity is ranked lower than
100% of the 714 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 0.68 vs. RLOG: 16.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-Equity only.
RLOG' s Debt-to-Equity Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.66  Med: 1.74 Max: 16.78
Current: 16.78
0.66
16.78
Debt-to-EBITDA 6.50
RLOG's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
72% of the 661 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 3.38 vs. RLOG: 6.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-EBITDA only.
RLOG' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -74.25  Med: 5.57 Max: 6.71
Current: 6.5
-74.25
6.71
Interest Coverage 0.08
RLOG's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
99% of the 689 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 9.04 vs. RLOG: 0.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
RLOG' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.08  Med: 1.18 Max: 1.63
Current: 0.08
0.08
1.63
Piotroski F-Score: 4
Altman Z-Score: -0.98
Beneish M-Score: -2.92
WACC vs ROIC
9.97%
0.49%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 1.60
RLOG's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
72% of the 834 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 5.46 vs. RLOG: 1.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
RLOG' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9.88  Med: 5.71 Max: 10.31
Current: 1.6
-9.88
10.31
Net Margin % -18.21
RLOG's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
87% of the 836 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 3.51 vs. RLOG: -18.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
RLOG' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -18.21  Med: -2.87 Max: 5.5
Current: -18.21
-18.21
5.5
ROE % -76.33
RLOG's ROE % is ranked lower than
97% of the 824 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 6.15 vs. RLOG: -76.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
RLOG' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -76.33  Med: -12.45 Max: 7.72
Current: -76.33
-76.33
7.72
ROA % -7.95
RLOG's ROA % is ranked lower than
90% of the 842 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 2.78 vs. RLOG: -7.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
RLOG' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -7.95  Med: -1.67 Max: 3.43
Current: -7.95
-7.95
3.43
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 0.84
RLOG's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
77% of the 829 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 8.99 vs. RLOG: 0.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
RLOG' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -14.12  Med: 4.18 Max: 10.47
Current: 0.84
-14.12
10.47
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -10.30
RLOG's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
82% of the 760 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 0.90 vs. RLOG: -10.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
RLOG' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -5.4 Max: 2.2
Current: -10.3
0
2.2
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -3.00
RLOG's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
73% of the 652 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 4.80 vs. RLOG: -3.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
RLOG' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 1.9 Max: 54.8
Current: -3
0
54.8
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 34.90
RLOG's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
84% of the 584 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 6.00 vs. RLOG: 34.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
RLOG' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 13.75 Max: 297.9
Current: 34.9
0
297.9
» RLOG's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-11-09)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2016

RLOG Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Jim Simons 139,600 sh (+7.06%)
» More
Q4 2016

RLOG Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Jim Simons 149,600 sh (+7.16%)
» More
Q1 2017

RLOG Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Jim Simons 166,700 sh (+11.43%)
» More
Q2 2017

RLOG Guru Trades in Q2 2017

Jim Simons 135,900 sh (-18.48%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with RLOG

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Transportation & Logistics » Shipping & Ports    NAICS: 483113    SIC: 4432
Compare:ISX:KARW, ORSE:RKB1R, BOM:501833, BSE:SNO, ATH:ANEPO, ZAG:JDPL, STU:HHX, ISX:RIGS, BOM:526508, XLIS:ORE, OSTO:PALS B, SGX:BJE, OCSE:ERRIA, NAS:TOPS, OTCPK:TEUFF, OTCPK:PRGNF, STC:VOS, BKK:JUTHA, SGX:IW5, SGX:O2I » details
Headquarter Location:USA
Rand Logistics Inc is a shipping company. The Company, through its subsidiaries is engaged in the operation of bulk carriers on the Great Lakes. It transports construction aggregates, salt, grain, iron ore and other dry bulk commodities for customers.

Rand Logistics Inc is a shipping company. The Company, through its subsidiaries is engaged in the operation of bulk carriers on the Great Lakes. It transports construction aggregates, salt, grain, iron ore and other dry bulk commodities for customers.

Top Ranked Articles about Rand Logistics Inc

Rand Logistics Announces 2017 Marine Miracle Month Program Results
Rand Logistics Receives International Safety Management Code Certification on Eight Canadian Vessels
Rand Logistics to Announce Fiscal Year 2018 First Quarter Results on August 14, 2017; Hold Conference Call on August 15
Rand Logistics Launches Second Annual Marine Miracle Month Program
Rand Logistics Announces Expectations for 2017 Sailing Season
JERSEY CITY, N.J., March 27, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Rand Logistics, Inc. (NASDAQ:RLOG) (“Rand”), a leading provider of bulk freight shipping services throughout the Great Lakes region, today announced its outlook for the 2017 Sailing Season.  In summary, the Company anticipates improved financial performance over the 2016 Sailing Season based on recent contract wins, improved customer demand and continued cost savings initiatives.
“We are projecting to sail approximately 3,600 days with 14 vessels in the 2017 season, including all six of our Canadian flagged self-unloaders, our three Canadian flagged bulkers, and five of our six U.S. flagged self-unloaders. For comparison purposes, we sailed 3,560 days in the 2016 Sailing Season and we operated 14 of our vessels. We do not expect to utilize any third-party vessels to haul our customer tonnage in the 2017 Sailing Season, and we are presently evaluating several return-generating alternatives for our sixth U.S. flagged self-unloader," stated Ed Levy, Rand's President and Chief Executive Officer."Based on the current market environment and assuming no change in the U.S./Canadian foreign exchange rate, we are projecting vessel margin per day for our fiscal year ending March 31, 2018 to be approximately $13,400, or 12% greater than preliminary vessel margin per day for our fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,” continued Mr. Levy. "Market conditions for the commodities that we carry have improved compared to this time last year. There still remains leftover grain tonnage from 2016's record setting Canadian harvest, and, at current prices, iron ore exporting is economically attractive and causing tighter capacity in our market. We were successful in increasing market share with certain of our customers whose contracts we renewed over the last 120 days, and we are pleased with our tonnage nominations for the upcoming sailing season. Based on current market conditions and customer nominations received to date, we are expecting our tonnage hauled to increase 7% in the 2017 Sailing Season compared the 2016 Sailing Season,” Mr. Levy concluded.“We are well on our way to achieving an additional $1 million of annual cost savings, which will result in approximately $5 million of aggregate cost savings since we commenced a comprehensive evaluation of our cost structure at the beginning of 2016. These reductions have been realized in a number of areas, including insurance, provisions, spare parts, and general and administration expenses. Our cost savings program is part of an initiative to improve return on invested capital,” stated Mark Hiltwein, Rand's Chief Financial Officer.“Our 2017 operational initiatives include continuing to rationalize our cost structure, managing capital expenses, continuing to improve our operational efficiencies and achieving a higher value-added revenue. We are also actively focused on strategies to refinance our debt,” Mr. Hiltwein concluded.

About Rand Logistics 
Rand Logistics, Inc. is a leading provider of bulk freight shipping services throughout the Great Lakes region. Through its subsidiaries, the Company operates a fleet of three conventional bulk carriers and twelve self-unloading bulk carriers including three tug/barge units. The Company is the only carrier able to offer significant domestic port-to-port services in both Canada and the U.S. on the Great Lakes. The Company's vessels operate under the U.S. Jones Act – which reserves domestic waterborne commerce to vessels that are U.S. owned, built and crewed – and the Canada Coasting Trade Act – which reserves domestic waterborne commerce to Canadian registered and crewed vessels that operate between Canadian ports.Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements which reflect management’s current views with respect to certain future events and Rand’s operations, performance and financial condition. Forward-looking statements are made only as of the date of this press release. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: Rand’s future operating or financial results; Rand’s anticipated plans, goals or objectives of our management for operations and services, including future cost reduction initiatives; Rand’s anticipated financial position and liquidity, including Rand's ability to remain in compliance with debt covenants; Rand's views on growth opportunities, the regulatory and competitive outlook, investment and expenditure plans, investment results, strategic alternatives, business strategies, and other similar statements of expectations or objectives; and Rand’s outlook and financial and other guidance. For all forward-looking statements, we claim the protection of the Safe Harbor for Forward-Looking Statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which cannot be predicted with accuracy or are otherwise beyond our control and some of which might not even be anticipated. Our actual results and strategic plan as well as our financial position, results of operations and cash flows could differ materially from those described in or contemplated by the forward-looking statements.Important factors that contribute to such risks include, but are not limited to, the effect of any economic downturn in certain of our markets; the weather conditions on the Great Lakes; our ability to maintain and replace our vessels as they age; changes in customer demand; changes in shipping regulations; fluctuations in currencies and interest rates; changes in fuel price and fuel surcharges; adequacy of capital resources, including the ability to refinance or obtain financing in the future; expectations of vessels’ useful lives and the estimated obligations, and the timing thereof, relating to vessel repair or maintenance work; expected capital spending or operating expenses, including dry-docking and insurance costs; the ability to comply with or regain compliance with applicable regulations, Nasdaq listing requirements, and Rand’s debt covenants; changes in laws, regulations or tax rates, or the outcome of pending legislative or regulatory initiatives; and potential liability from pending or future litigation.The risks included are not exhaustive. For a more detailed description of these uncertainties and other factors, please see the "Risk Factors" section in Rand's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 16, 2016 and in Rand’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2017.
CONTACT:

Rand Logistics, Inc.

Corporate Communications:
Annemarie Dobler
(212) 863-9429
apdobler@randlogisticsinc.com

Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PS Ratio 0.06
RLOG's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
99% of the 814 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 1.13 vs. RLOG: 0.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
RLOG' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.04  Med: 0.63 Max: 1.36
Current: 0.06
0.04
1.36
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 40.00
RLOG's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
93% of the 489 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 8.38 vs. RLOG: 40.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
RLOG' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.55  Med: 5.91 Max: 380.59
Current: 40
0.55
380.59
EV-to-EBIT 136.03
RLOG's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
97% of the 647 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 15.79 vs. RLOG: 136.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
RLOG' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -882.4  Med: 28.3 Max: 1232.1
Current: 136.03
-882.4
1232.1
EV-to-EBITDA 7.06
RLOG's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
76% of the 718 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. RLOG: 7.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
RLOG' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -315  Med: 8.5 Max: 69.5
Current: 7.06
-315
69.5
EV-to-Revenue 2.19
RLOG's EV-to-Revenue is ranked lower than
56% of the 816 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 1.74 vs. RLOG: 2.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
RLOG' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.8  Med: 1.7 Max: 2.2
Current: 2.19
0.8
2.2
Current Ratio 0.09
RLOG's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
99% of the 805 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 1.24 vs. RLOG: 0.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
RLOG' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.03  Med: 0.75 Max: 411.08
Current: 0.09
0.03
411.08
Quick Ratio 0.07
RLOG's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
99% of the 805 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 1.17 vs. RLOG: 0.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
RLOG' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.03  Med: 0.71 Max: 411.08
Current: 0.07
0.03
411.08
Days Inventory 22.18
RLOG's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
66% of the 665 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 11.44 vs. RLOG: 22.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
RLOG' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.15  Med: 14.22 Max: 22.18
Current: 22.18
7.15
22.18
Days Sales Outstanding 50.37
RLOG's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
59% of the 606 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 44.08 vs. RLOG: 50.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
RLOG' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.17  Med: 12.88 Max: 50.37
Current: 50.37
3.17
50.37
Days Payable 59.21
RLOG's Days Payable is ranked higher than
65% of the 517 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 39.12 vs. RLOG: 59.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
RLOG' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.47  Med: 51.64 Max: 1422.87
Current: 59.21
14.47
1422.87

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -1.30
RLOG's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
55% of the 449 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: -2.30 vs. RLOG: -1.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
RLOG' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -32  Med: -10.1 Max: -0.7
Current: -1.3
-32
-0.7

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.10
RLOG's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
99% of the 731 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 1.08 vs. RLOG: 0.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
RLOG' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.1  Med: 1.07 Max: 172.67
Current: 0.1
0.1
172.67
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 0.73
RLOG's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
75% of the 842 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 4.77 vs. RLOG: 0.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
RLOG' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -8.2  Med: 2.65 Max: 8.9
Current: 0.73
-8.2
8.9
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -192.72
RLOG's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
99% of the 498 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 5.05 vs. RLOG: -192.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
RLOG' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -294.9  Med: -19.3 Max: 35.5
Current: -192.72
-294.9
35.5

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $113.98
EPS (TTM) $ -1.22
Beta1.41
Short Percentage of Float3.69%
52-Week Range $0.19 - 2.95
Shares Outstanding (Mil)18.63

Piotroski F-Score Details

Piotroski F-Score: 44
Positive ROAN
Positive CFROAY
Higher ROA yoyN
CFROA > ROAY
Lower Leverage yoyY
Higher Current Ratio yoyN
Less Shares Outstanding yoyN
Higher Gross Margin yoyY
Higher Asset Turnover yoyN

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}