Switch to:
Also traded in: Argentina, Belgium, Germany, Mexico, Switzerland, UK, USA

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.51
RTPPF's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
73% of the 1583 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. RTPPF: 0.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
RTPPF' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.03  Med: 0.23 Max: 1.95
Current: 0.51
0.03
1.95
Equity-to-Asset 0.47
RTPPF's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
65% of the 723 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 0.58 vs. RTPPF: 0.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
RTPPF' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.18  Med: 0.43 Max: 0.55
Current: 0.47
0.18
0.55
Debt-to-Equity 0.38
RTPPF's Debt-to-Equity is ranked lower than
53% of the 686 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 0.34 vs. RTPPF: 0.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-Equity only.
RTPPF' s Debt-to-Equity Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.08  Med: 0.54 Max: 2.37
Current: 0.38
0.08
2.37
Debt-to-EBITDA 1.07
RTPPF's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
69% of the 488 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.42 vs. RTPPF: 1.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-EBITDA only.
RTPPF' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.62  Med: 1.8 Max: 4.94
Current: 1.07
0.62
4.94
Interest Coverage 13.44
RTPPF's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
76% of the 1066 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 10000.00 vs. RTPPF: 13.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
RTPPF' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.62  Med: 14.65 Max: 28.3
Current: 13.44
4.62
28.3
Piotroski F-Score: 9
Altman Z-Score: 2.05
WACC vs ROIC
8.62%
13.69%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 28.78
RTPPF's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
89% of the 753 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 3.41 vs. RTPPF: 28.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
RTPPF' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.78  Med: 19.03 Max: 35.54
Current: 28.78
-3.78
35.54
Net Margin % 16.51
RTPPF's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
84% of the 755 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.29 vs. RTPPF: 16.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
RTPPF' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.94  Med: 10.65 Max: 25.81
Current: 16.51
-5.94
25.81
ROE % 16.20
RTPPF's ROE % is ranked higher than
90% of the 1432 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -8.80 vs. RTPPF: 16.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
RTPPF' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -6.01  Med: 13.8 Max: 33.63
Current: 16.2
-6.01
33.63
ROA % 7.14
RTPPF's ROA % is ranked higher than
88% of the 1596 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -8.38 vs. RTPPF: 7.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
RTPPF' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.49  Med: 5 Max: 13.81
Current: 7.14
-2.49
13.81
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 17.29
RTPPF's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
88% of the 1519 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -12.04 vs. RTPPF: 17.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
RTPPF' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.91  Med: 16.65 Max: 40.92
Current: 17.29
-2.91
40.92
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -3.80
RTPPF's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
53% of the 672 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -2.40 vs. RTPPF: -3.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
RTPPF' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -74.6  Med: -2.95 Max: 255.8
Current: -3.8
-74.6
255.8
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 22.20
RTPPF's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
84% of the 1261 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -13.70 vs. RTPPF: 22.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
RTPPF' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -78.1  Med: 0.35 Max: 356.9
Current: 22.2
-78.1
356.9
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 19.30
RTPPF's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
79% of the 1135 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -20.60 vs. RTPPF: 19.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
RTPPF' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -36.3  Med: 7.2 Max: 101.7
Current: 19.3
-36.3
101.7
GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with Rio Tinto PLC RTPPF.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» RTPPF's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2018-02-08)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with RTPPF

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Metals & Mining » Industrial Metals & Minerals    NAICS: 212210 
Compare:ASX:RIO, LSE:BLT, LSE:GLEN, ASX:BHP, BSP:VALE3, LSE:AAL, MEX:GMEXICO B, HKSE:03993, BOM:500188, BOM:500295, SAU:1211, LSE:FRES, ASX:S32, ASX:FMG, SHSE:601899, TSX:TECK.B, LSE:ANTO, MIC:ALRS, MEX:PE&OLES, SZSE:002460 » details
Traded in other countries:RIO.Argentina, RIOS.Belgium, RIOA.Germany, RIO N.Mexico, RIOP.Switzerland, RIO.UK, RIO.USA,
Headquarter Location:UK
Rio Tinto Plc is a mining and exploration company. It discovers, mines, processes and supplies metals and minerals used in everyday modern life. Its main products include Bauxite, Alumina, Copper, Gold, Molybdenum, Silver, Nickel, and Diamonds.

Rio Tinto searches for and extracts a variety of minerals worldwide, with the heaviest concentrations in North America and Australia. Iron ore is the dominant commodity, with meaningful contributions from aluminium, copper, diamonds, energy products, gold, and industrial minerals. The 1995 merger of RTZ and CRA, via a dual-listed structure, created the present-day company. The two operate as a single business entity. Shareholders in each company have equivalent economic and voting rights.

Top Ranked Articles about Rio Tinto PLC

Hagens Berman Alerts Rio Tinto PLC Investors to Limited Time to File Claims Related to SEC Allegations that in 2012 RIO Defrauded Investors
The Power of Psychology and Low P/Es David Dreman likes to see the market overreact, especially negatively; that means it’s time to go shopping
Bestinfond Seeks Value in UK Equities in 1st Quarter Firm adds 3 new positions to its portfolio
Francisco García Paramés (Trades, Portfolio), the former portfolio manager of Bestinfond (Trades, Portfolio), follows investing styles from Benjamin Graham, Warren Buffett (Trades, Portfolio) and Peter Lynch. Current Bestinfond President Beltrán de la Lastra continued Paramés' approach by investing in companies with Read more...
Newmont Mining Reports Management Change The largest gold mining company in the US appoints new leadership in the Australian business
Newmont Mining Corp. (NYSE:NEM) announced a change in its top management Monday. Read more...
INVESTOR ALERT: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Reminds Shareholders of Rio Tinto plc of Commencement of a Class Action Lawsuit and a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of February 10, 2017 – RIO

NEW YORK, Feb. 08, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The following statement is being issued by Levi & Korsinsky, LLP:
To: All persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired securities of Rio Tinto plc (“Rio Tinto”) (NYSE:NYSE:RIO) between March 16, 2012 and November 14, 2016. You are hereby notified that a securities class action lawsuit has been commenced in the USDC for the Southern District of New York. To get more information go to: http://www.zlk.com/pslra/rio-tinto-plc or contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. either via email at [email protected] or by telephone at (212) 363-7500, toll-free: (877) 363-5972. There is no cost or obligation to you. The complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period defendants issued materially false and misleading statements to investors and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Rio Tinto violated anti-corruption laws in connection with its operations in the Simandou project; (ii) the foregoing violations would expose the Company to significant scrutiny and large fines; and (iii) as a result of the foregoing, Rio Tinto’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. If you suffered a loss in Rio Tinto you have until February 10, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. Levi & Korsinsky is a national firm with offices in New York, New Jersey, California, Connecticut, and Washington D.C. The firm’s attorneys have extensive expertise and experience representing investors in securities litigation involving financial fraud, and have recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
CONTACT:
Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
Joseph E. Levi, Esq.
30 Broad Street - 24th Floor
New York, NY 10004
Tel: (212) 363-7500
Toll Free: (877) 363-5972
Fax: (212) 363-7171
www.zlk.com

Read more...
DEADLINE ALERT: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against Rio Tinto plc (RIO) and Lead Plaintiff Deadline: February 10, 2017

NEW YORK, Feb. 07, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Attorney Advertising -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC remind investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Rio Tinto plc (“Rio Tinto” or the “Company”) (NYSE:NYSE:RIO) and certain of its officers, and is on behalf of a class consisting of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired Rio Tinto American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”) between March 16, 2012 and November 14, 2016, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are advised to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/rio.
The class action lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Rio Tinto is a British-Australian multinational and one of the world's largest metals and mining corporations. The Company mines and produces aluminum products, including bauxite, alumina, and aluminum; copper, gold, silver, and molybdenum, as well as nickel; diamonds, titanium dioxide feedstocks, borates, and salt, as well as high purity iron, metal powders, zircon, and rutile; uranium; iron ore; and thermal coal, and coking or metallurgical coal.  Rio Tinto held a significant stake in the Simandou iron mine at all relevant times. The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Rio Tinto’s business, operations, and prospects.  Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Rio Tinto violated anti-corruption laws in connection with its operations with respect to the Simandou project; (2) the above-mentioned violations would expose Rio Tinto to a heavy inspection and large fines; and (3) consequently, Rio Tinto’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. On November 9, 2016, Rio Tinto said that on August 29, 2016, it “became aware of email correspondence from 2011 relating to contractual payments totaling US$10.5 million made to a consultant providing advisory services on the Simandou project in Guinea.”  Rio Tinto began an investigation led by external counsel, contacted U.K. and U.S. authorities, and suspended Alan Davies, chief executive of Energy and Minerals. Debra Valentine, an executive of Rio Tinto’s Legal & Regulatory Affairs group also resigned. On November 14, 2016, post-market, Bloomberg News released an article: “Rio CEO Says Staff ‘Shocked’ by Probe That May Take Years.” Following this news, and the continued investigation, Rio Tinto’s ADR price dropped $1.52, or 3.83%, to close at $38.13 on November 15, 2016. After market hours on November 15, 2016, Rio Tinto announced Mr. Davies’ and Ms. Valentine’s termination. Following this news, Rio Tinto’s ADR price dropped $0.77 per share, or 2.02%, to close at $37.36 on November 16, 2016. Then pre-market on November 18, 2016, Bloomberg News announced that Guinea’s Mines and Geology Minister, Abdoulaye Magassouba, had requested details of the internal inquiry from Rio Tinto’s Chief Executive Officer, Jean-Sébastian Jacques. That same day, Bloomberg News published an article: “Rio Tinto Offered Bribe for Mine, Ex-Guinea Minister Says,” writing that the head of Rio Tinto’s Guinea operation had offered a bribe to the country’s former mining minister for the Simandou project. Following these revelations, Rio Tinto’s ADR price dropped $1.01 per share, or 2.69%, to close at $36.55 on November 18, 2016. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint you can visit the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/rio  or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Investor Relations Analyst, Yael Hurwitz of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 212-697-6484. If you suffered a loss in Rio Tinto you have until February 10, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff.  Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a corporate litigation boutique.  Our primary expertise is the aggressive pursuit of litigation claims on behalf of our clients.  In addition to representing institutions and other investor plaintiffs in class action security litigation, the firm’s expertise includes general corporate and commercial litigation, as well as securities arbitration.   Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Contact:
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Peretz Bronstein or Yael Hurwitz
212-697-6484 | [email protected]

Read more...
RIO TINTO PLC INVESTOR DEADLINE: Hagens Berman Reminds Rio Tinto Investors of Lead Plaintiff Deadline in Bribery-Related Securities Class Action

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 06, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP reminds investors in Rio Tinto plc (NYSE:NYSE:RIO) of the February 10, 2017 Lead Plaintiff deadline in the bribery-related securities class action lawsuit.
If you purchased or otherwise acquired securities of RIO between March 16, 2012 and November 14, 2016 and suffered over $50,000 in losses contact Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP.  For more information visit: https://www.hbsslaw.com/cases/RIO or contact Reed Kathrein, who is leading the firm’s investigation, by calling 510-725-3000 or emailing [email protected]. On November 9, 2016 Rio Tinto alerted U.S. and U.K. regulatory authorities to 2011 emails concerning $10.5 million in payments made to a consultant related to its Simandou project in Guinea.  Rio’s Energy & Materials CEO (Alan Davies), who was accountable for the Simandou project, was immediately suspended.  On November 15, 2016 both Alan Davies and Rio’s Legal & Regulatory Affairs executive (Debra Valentine) were fired. In addition, on December 12, 2016 BSG Resources Ltd. sent a “Letter Before Action” to Rio setting forth facts in support of its pre-suit claims that Rio’s alleged bribery conduct caused extensive losses and damages to BSG that it estimates “runs to billions of US dollars.” Defendants also confirmed the SEC is investigating Rio’s accounting for certain other operations. “We’re focused on the alleged bribery issues, the circumstances surrounding the firings of Davies and Valentine, and other possible accounting improprieties that would violate Federal securities laws,” said Hagens Berman partner Reed Kathrein. Whistleblowers: Persons with non-public information regarding Rio should consider their options to help in the investigation or take advantage of the SEC Whistleblower program. Under the new SEC whistleblower program, whistleblowers who provide original information may receive rewards totaling up to 30 percent of any successful recovery made by the SEC. For more information, call Reed Kathrein at 510-725-3000 or email [email protected]. About Hagens Berman
Hagens Berman is a national investor-rights law firm headquartered in Seattle, Washington with offices in 10 cities. The Firm represents investors, whistleblowers, workers and consumers in complex litigation. More about the Firm and its successes can be found at www.hbsslaw.com. Read the Firm’s Securities Newsletter.  For the latest news visit our newsroom or follow us on Twitter at @classactionlaw.
Reed Kathrein, 510-725-3000

Read more...
SHAREHOLDER ALERT:  Pomerantz Law Firm Reminds Shareholders with Losses on their Investment in Rio Tinto plc of Class Action Lawsuit and Upcoming Deadline – RIO

NEW YORK, Jan. 25, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Pomerantz LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Rio Tinto plc (“Rio Tinto” or the “Company”) (NYSE:NYSE:RIO) and certain of its officers.   The class action, filed in United States District Court, Southern District of New York, and docketed under 16-cv-09572, is on behalf of a class consisting of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired Rio Tinto American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”) between March 16, 2012 and November 14, 2016, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), seeking to recover compensable damages caused by defendants’ violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
If you are a shareholder who purchased Rio Tinto ADRs during the Class Period, you have until February 10, 2017 to ask the Court to appoint you as Lead Plaintiff for the class.  A copy of the Complaint can be obtained at www.pomerantzlaw.com.   To discuss this action, contact Robert S. Willoughby at [email protected] or 888.476.6529 (or 888.4-POMLAW), toll free, ext. 9980. Those who inquire by e-mail are encouraged to include their mailing address, telephone number, and number of shares purchased.  [Click here to join this class action] Rio Tinto, a mining and metals company, finds, mines, and processes mineral resources. The Company mines and produces aluminum products, including bauxite, alumina, and aluminum; copper, gold, silver, and molybdenum, as well as nickel; diamonds, titanium dioxide feedstocks, borates, and salt, as well as high purity iron, metal powders, zircon, and rutile; uranium; iron ore; and thermal coal, and coking or metallurgical coal.  Rio Tinto has operations in Australia, North America, Asia, Europe, Africa, and South America.  At all relevant times, Rio Tinto has held a significant stake in the Simandou iron mine, located in southern Guinea.  The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects.  Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:  (i) Rio Tinto violated anti-corruption laws in connection with its operations with respect to the Simandou project; (ii) the foregoing violations would expose the Company to significant scrutiny and large fines; and (iii) as a result of the foregoing, Rio Tinto’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant time On November 9, 2016, Rio Tinto announced that on August 29, 2016, “Rio Tinto became aware of email correspondence from 2011 relating to contractual payments totalling US$10.5 million made to a consultant providing advisory services on the Simandou project in Guinea,” that the Company had suspended Energy & Minerals chief executive Alan Davies, and that the Company’s Legal & Regulatory Affairs group executive Debra Valentine had resigned from her role. On November 14, 2016, post-market, Bloomberg News published an article entitled “Rio CEO Says Staff ‘Shocked’ by Probe That May Take Years.” On this news, as the market processed the significance and scope of the investigation that the Company faced, Rio Tinto’s ADR price fell $1.52, or 3.83%, to close at $38.13 on November 15, 2016, the following trading day. On November 15, 2016, post-market, Rio Tinto announced the termination of Mr. Davies and Ms. Valentine.  On this news, Rio Tinto’s ADR price fell $0.77, or 2.02%, to close at $37.36 on November 16, 2016. On November 18, 2016, pre-market, Bloomberg News reported that Guinea’s Mines and Geology Minister, Abdoulaye Magassouba, had written a letter to Rio Tinto’s Chief Executive Officer, Jean-Sébastian Jacques, asking him to provide details of the internal inquiry.  On November 18, 2016, pre-market, Bloomberg News also published an article entitled “Rio Tinto Offered Bribe for Mine, Ex-Guinea Minister Says,” reporting that the head of Rio Tinto’s Guinea operation had offered the country’s former mining minister a bribe in connection with the Simandou project. On these disclosures, Rio Tinto’s ADR price fell $1.01, or 2.69%, to close at $36.55 on November 18, 2016. The Pomerantz Firm, with offices in New York, Chicago, Florida, and Los Angeles, is acknowledged as one of the premier firms in the areas of corporate, securities, and antitrust class litigation. Founded by the late Abraham L. Pomerantz, known as the dean of the class action bar, the Pomerantz Firm pioneered the field of securities class actions. Today, more than 80 years later, the Pomerantz Firm continues in the tradition he established, fighting for the rights of the victims of securities fraud, breaches of fiduciary duty, and corporate misconduct. The Firm has recovered numerous multimillion-dollar damages awards on behalf of class members. See www.pomerantzlaw.com
CONTACT:
Robert S. Willoughby
Pomerantz LLP
[email protected]

Read more...
RIO LOSS NOTICE: Rosen Law Firm Reminds Rio Tinto plc Investors of Important Deadline in Class Action – RIO
NEW YORK, Jan. 24, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of Rio Tinto plc securities (NYSE:NYSE:RIO) from March 16, 2012 through November 14, 2016, inclusive (the “Class Period”) of the important February 10, 2017 lead plaintiff deadline in the class action. The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for Rio Tinto investors under the federal securities laws.To join the Rio Tinto class action, go to http://rosenlegal.com/cases-998.html or call Phillip Kim, Esq. or Kevin Chan, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] or [email protected] for information on the class action.NO CLASS HAS YET BEEN CERTIFIED IN THE ABOVE ACTION. UNTIL A CLASS IS CERTIFIED, YOU ARE NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL UNLESS YOU RETAIN ONE. YOU MAY ALSO REMAIN AN ABSENT CLASS MEMBER AND DO NOTHING AT THIS POINT. YOU MAY RETAIN COUNSEL OF YOUR CHOICE.According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period defendants issued materially false and misleading statements to investors and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Rio Tinto violated anti-corruption laws in connection with its operations with respect to the Simandou project; (2) the foregoing violations would expose Rio Tinto to significant scrutiny and large fines; and (3) as a result of the foregoing, Rio Tinto’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than February 10, 2017. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. If you wish to join the litigation, go to http://rosenlegal.com/cases-998.html or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Phillip Kim, Esq. or Kevin Chan, Esq. of Rosen Law Firm toll free at 866-767-3653 or via e-mail at [email protected] or [email protected]. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm or on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm.Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation.
Contact Information:
Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
Kevin Chan, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
www.rosenlegal.com


Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 13.94
RTPPF's PE Ratio is ranked higher than
62% of the 517 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 19.33 vs. RTPPF: 13.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
RTPPF' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.53  Med: 15.61 Max: 29.92
Current: 13.94
5.53
29.92
Forward PE Ratio 11.63
RTPPF's Forward PE Ratio is ranked higher than
63% of the 176 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 13.74 vs. RTPPF: 11.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 13.94
RTPPF's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked higher than
62% of the 517 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 19.33 vs. RTPPF: 13.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
RTPPF' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.51  Med: 15.37 Max: 29.92
Current: 13.94
4.51
29.92
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 25.70
RTPPF's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked lower than
60% of the 290 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 17.53 vs. RTPPF: 25.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
RTPPF' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.21  Med: 18.05 Max: 30.08
Current: 25.7
5.21
30.08
PB Ratio 2.04
RTPPF's PB Ratio is ranked higher than
52% of the 1450 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.01 vs. RTPPF: 2.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
RTPPF' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.76  Med: 1.62 Max: 6.51
Current: 2.04
0.76
6.51
PS Ratio 2.53
RTPPF's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
58% of the 673 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.76 vs. RTPPF: 2.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
RTPPF' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.37  Med: 1.97 Max: 6.6
Current: 2.53
0.37
6.6
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 15.63
RTPPF's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
50% of the 234 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 14.38 vs. RTPPF: 15.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
RTPPF' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.22  Med: 14.03 Max: 52.8
Current: 15.63
3.22
52.8
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 10.07
RTPPF's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
52% of the 382 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 8.84 vs. RTPPF: 10.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
RTPPF' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.37  Med: 6.82 Max: 21.36
Current: 10.07
1.37
21.36
EV-to-EBIT 9.96
RTPPF's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
68% of the 527 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 14.76 vs. RTPPF: 9.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
RTPPF' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -55.7  Med: 10.3 Max: 4391.9
Current: 9.96
-55.7
4391.9
EV-to-EBITDA 6.81
RTPPF's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
69% of the 571 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 10.14 vs. RTPPF: 6.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
RTPPF' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.1  Med: 8.15 Max: 47.9
Current: 6.81
4.1
47.9
EV-to-Revenue 2.65
RTPPF's EV-to-Revenue is ranked lower than
52% of the 734 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.31 vs. RTPPF: 2.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
RTPPF' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.1  Med: 2.4 Max: 7.7
Current: 2.65
1.1
7.7
PEG Ratio 2.77
RTPPF's PEG Ratio is ranked lower than
67% of the 127 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.57 vs. RTPPF: 2.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
RTPPF' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.14  Med: 0.59 Max: 2.83
Current: 2.77
0.14
2.83
Shiller PE Ratio 21.29
RTPPF's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
60% of the 203 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 24.80 vs. RTPPF: 21.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
RTPPF' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.05  Med: 17.99 Max: 51.86
Current: 21.29
7.05
51.86
Current Ratio 1.71
RTPPF's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
58% of the 1536 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.38 vs. RTPPF: 1.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
RTPPF' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.4  Med: 1.33 Max: 1.8
Current: 1.71
0.4
1.8
Quick Ratio 1.34
RTPPF's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
58% of the 1536 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.89 vs. RTPPF: 1.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
RTPPF' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.23  Med: 0.86 Max: 1.43
Current: 1.34
0.23
1.43
Days Inventory 42.37
RTPPF's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
74% of the 629 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 73.45 vs. RTPPF: 42.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
RTPPF' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 37.99  Med: 52.41 Max: 223.79
Current: 42.37
37.99
223.79
Days Sales Outstanding 28.52
RTPPF's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
56% of the 621 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 33.96 vs. RTPPF: 28.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
RTPPF' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.3  Med: 30.5 Max: 59.69
Current: 28.52
14.3
59.69
Days Payable 39.65
RTPPF's Days Payable is ranked lower than
56% of the 462 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 46.54 vs. RTPPF: 39.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
RTPPF' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 27.9  Med: 33.56 Max: 175.87
Current: 39.65
27.9
175.87

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 4.94
RTPPF's Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
84% of the 731 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.17 vs. RTPPF: 4.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
RTPPF' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.74  Med: 3.07 Max: 9.7
Current: 4.94
0.74
9.7
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.49
RTPPF's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked higher than
100% of the 306 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 0.32 vs. RTPPF: 0.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
RTPPF' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.14  Med: 0.42 Max: 0.89
Current: 0.49
0.14
0.89
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 3.20
RTPPF's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked higher than
70% of the 241 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -17.50 vs. RTPPF: 3.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
RTPPF' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 7.35 Max: 44.7
Current: 3.2
0
44.7
Forward Dividend Yield % 4.94
RTPPF's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
85% of the 678 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.44 vs. RTPPF: 4.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 7.96
RTPPF's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked higher than
89% of the 967 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.25 vs. RTPPF: 7.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
RTPPF' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.19  Med: 4.94 Max: 15.62
Current: 7.96
1.19
15.62
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 1.00
RTPPF's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
97% of the 1234 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -16.10 vs. RTPPF: 1.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
RTPPF' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -326.6  Med: -0.05 Max: 76
Current: 1
-326.6
76

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 2.26
RTPPF's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked higher than
53% of the 1414 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.20 vs. RTPPF: 2.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
RTPPF' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.24  Med: 2.78 Max: 384.69
Current: 2.26
1.24
384.69
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 1.51
RTPPF's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 393 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.03 vs. RTPPF: 1.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
RTPPF' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 1.21 Max: 2.48
Current: 1.51
0
2.48
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.28
RTPPF's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 558 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 0.99 vs. RTPPF: 1.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
RTPPF' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 1.04 Max: 2.38
Current: 1.28
0
2.38
Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value 2.84
RTPPF's Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 82 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.07 vs. RTPPF: 2.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value only.
RTPPF' s Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.8 Max: 5.08
Current: 2.84
0
5.08
Price-to-Graham-Number 1.18
RTPPF's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked higher than
57% of the 432 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.24 vs. RTPPF: 1.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
RTPPF' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.02  Med: 1.41 Max: 13.24
Current: 1.18
1.02
13.24
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 10.04
RTPPF's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
89% of the 1591 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -4.24 vs. RTPPF: 10.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
RTPPF' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.5  Med: 9 Max: 21.2
Current: 10.04
-2.5
21.2
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 9.53
RTPPF's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
65% of the 336 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -0.26 vs. RTPPF: 9.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
RTPPF' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -19.6  Med: 16.9 Max: 41.7
Current: 9.53
-19.6
41.7

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $37,600.00
EPS (TTM) $ 3.43
Beta1.58
Short Percentage of Float0.00%
52-Week Range $31.30 - 49.90
Shares Outstanding (Mil)1,787.51

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 40,302 37,605 39,128
EPS ($) 4.75 3.96 3.98
EPS without NRI ($) 4.75 3.96 3.98
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
1.67%
Dividends per Share ($) 2.91 2.24 2.35

Piotroski F-Score Details

Piotroski F-Score: 99
Positive ROAY
Positive CFROAY
Higher ROA yoyY
CFROA > ROAY
Lower Leverage yoyY
Higher Current Ratio yoyY
Less Shares Outstanding yoyY
Higher Gross Margin yoyY
Higher Asset Turnover yoyY

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}