Switch to:
Also traded in: Brazil, Germany, Mexico

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 1.02
NYSE:WU's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
52% of the 413 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.44 vs. NYSE:WU: 1.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
NYSE:WU' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.37  Med: 0.96 Max: N/A
Current: 1.02
Equity-to-Asset 0.08
NYSE:WU's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
94% of the 316 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.39 vs. NYSE:WU: 0.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
NYSE:WU' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.11  Med: 0.1 Max: 0.65
Current: 0.08
-0.11
0.65
Interest Coverage 3.24
NYSE:WU's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
62% of the 377 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 11.69 vs. NYSE:WU: 3.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NYSE:WU' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.17  Med: 7.2 Max: 8.12
Current: 3.24
3.17
8.12
Piotroski F-Score: 5
Altman Z-Score: 1.33
Beneish M-Score: -2.90
WACC vs ROIC
7.10%
23.01%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 8.56
NYSE:WU's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
68% of the 407 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 17.78 vs. NYSE:WU: 8.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
NYSE:WU' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.56  Med: 24.26 Max: 26.98
Current: 8.56
8.56
26.98
Net Margin % 4.22
NYSE:WU's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
70% of the 406 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 12.96 vs. NYSE:WU: 4.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
NYSE:WU' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.22  Med: 17.05 Max: 21.22
Current: 4.22
4.22
21.22
ROE % 20.49
NYSE:WU's ROE % is ranked higher than
82% of the 404 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 8.10 vs. NYSE:WU: 20.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
NYSE:WU' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 20.49  Med: 111.79 Max: 4314.55
Current: 20.49
20.49
4314.55
ROA % 2.43
NYSE:WU's ROA % is ranked lower than
52% of the 418 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.58 vs. NYSE:WU: 2.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NYSE:WU' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.43  Med: 11.49 Max: 16.18
Current: 2.43
2.43
16.18
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 218.02
NYSE:WU's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
86% of the 324 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 15.47 vs. NYSE:WU: 218.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NYSE:WU' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 218.02  Med: 642.01 Max: 749.95
Current: 218.02
218.02
749.95
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 3.50
NYSE:WU's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
58% of the 291 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 6.30 vs. NYSE:WU: 3.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
NYSE:WU' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 7.6 Max: 13.1
Current: 3.5
0
13.1
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -14.70
NYSE:WU's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
77% of the 252 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 5.10 vs. NYSE:WU: -14.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
NYSE:WU' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 2 Max: 17.7
Current: -14.7
0
17.7
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -29.10
NYSE:WU's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
85% of the 247 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 5.00 vs. NYSE:WU: -29.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
NYSE:WU' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.6 Max: 23
Current: -29.1
0
23
GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with The Western Union Co $NYSE:WU.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NYSE:WU's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-08-03)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2016

WU Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Jim Simons 215,600 sh (New)
Jeremy Grantham 65,100 sh (+481.25%)
Paul Tudor Jones 56,712 sh (+128.20%)
Ray Dalio 523,041 sh (+39.35%)
Mairs and Power 5,050,464 sh (+1.97%)
David Abrams 21,608,707 sh (unchged)
Chuck Royce 201,700 sh (unchged)
Bernard Horn 234,600 sh (unchged)
Joel Greenblatt 1,852,274 sh (-1.25%)
David Dreman 17,140 sh (-5.12%)
Jeff Auxier 201,848 sh (-5.64%)
John Rogers 6,989,817 sh (-10.05%)
» More
Q3 2016

WU Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Jim Simons 968,500 sh (+349.21%)
David Dreman 17,140 sh (unchged)
David Abrams 21,608,707 sh (unchged)
Chuck Royce 201,700 sh (unchged)
Bernard Horn 234,600 sh (unchged)
Jeremy Grantham Sold Out
Mairs and Power 5,019,654 sh (-0.61%)
Jeff Auxier 181,634 sh (-10.01%)
John Rogers 6,206,933 sh (-11.20%)
Joel Greenblatt 1,230,471 sh (-33.57%)
Ray Dalio 241,400 sh (-53.85%)
Paul Tudor Jones 25,697 sh (-54.69%)
» More
Q4 2016

WU Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Jim Simons 1,589,900 sh (+64.16%)
David Dreman 20,223 sh (+17.99%)
David Abrams 21,608,707 sh (unchged)
Chuck Royce 201,700 sh (unchged)
Bernard Horn 234,600 sh (unchged)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Mairs and Power 5,016,881 sh (-0.06%)
John Rogers 5,956,053 sh (-4.04%)
Jeff Auxier 171,822 sh (-5.40%)
Joel Greenblatt 1,108,871 sh (-9.88%)
Ray Dalio 109,947 sh (-54.45%)
» More
Q1 2017

WU Guru Trades in Q1 2017

John Hussman 3,400 sh (New)
Jeremy Grantham 69,328 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 28,139 sh (New)
Jim Simons 2,347,900 sh (+47.68%)
David Dreman 20,223 sh (unchged)
David Abrams 21,608,707 sh (unchged)
Bernard Horn 234,600 sh (unchged)
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Mairs and Power 4,963,474 sh (-1.06%)
Joel Greenblatt 1,089,361 sh (-1.76%)
John Rogers 5,147,459 sh (-13.58%)
Jeff Auxier 122,059 sh (-28.96%)
Chuck Royce 109,100 sh (-45.91%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with WU

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Credit Services » Credit Services    NAICS: 522320    SIC: 7389
Compare:NYSE:TSS, NAS:SLM, NAS:CACC, NAS:NAVI, NYSE:OMF, NYSE:ADS, NYSE:FCFS, NAS:HAWK, NYSE:LC, NYSE:NNI, NYSE:GDOT, NAS:PRAA, NAS:MGI, NYSE:TCAP, NAS:FSC, NYSE:AGM, NAS:WRLD, NYSE:ENVA, NAS:NEWS, NAS:EZPW » details
Traded in other countries:WUNI34.Brazil, W3U.Germany, WU.Mexico,
Headquarter Location:USA
The Western Union Co is a provider of money movement and payment services. The company provides flexible and convenient options for making one-time or recurring payments. Its segments are Consumer-to-Consumer, Consumer-to-Business and Business Solutions.

Western Union provides domestic and international money transfers through its global network of about 500,000 outside agents. It is the largest money transfer company in the world and one of only two companies with a truly global agent network, with MoneyGram being the other.

Top Ranked Articles about The Western Union Co

SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Purcell Julie & Lefkowitz LLP Is Investigating The Western Union Company for Potential Breaches Of Fiduciary Duty By Its Board of Directors
DEADLINE ALERT: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against The Western Union Company (WU) & Lead Plaintiff Deadline - March 27, 2017

NEW YORK, March 24, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Attorney Advertising -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC reminds investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against The Western Union Company (“Western Union” or the “Company”) (:WU) and certain of its officers, on behalf of a class who purchased Western Union securities between February 24, 2012 and January 19, 2017, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/wu.
This class action seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Western Union’s fraud prevention efforts did not comply with applicable laws; (2) Western Union knowingly failed to maintain an effective anti-money laundering program; (3) Western Union aided and abetted wire fraud; (4) for at least five years, Western Union knew of agents structuring transactions designed to avoid the reporting requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act; (5) Western Union was not compliant with its regulatory responsibilities; (6) between 2004 and 2012, Western Union violated U.S. laws—the Bank Secrecy Act and anti-fraud statutes—by processing hundreds of thousands of transactions for Western Union agents and others involved in an international consumer fraud scheme; (7) Western Union knew of but failed to take corrective action against Western Union agents involved in or facilitating fraud-related transactions; (8) from January 1, 2004 and August 29, 2015, Western Union received at least 550,928 complaints about fraud-induced money transfers, totaling at least $632,721,044; and (9) consequently, Defendants’ public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. On January 19, 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission publicized that Western Union admitted to “aiding and abetting wire fraud” by allowing scammers to process transactions even when Western Union realized its agents were disguising transactions to avoid detection and therefore settled to pay $586 million. Following this news, Western Union stock dropped 3.30% to close at $21.13 per share on January 19, 2017. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint you can visit the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/wu or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Investor Relations Analyst, Yael Hurwitz of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 212-697-6484. If you suffered a loss in Western Union you have until March 27, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff.  Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a corporate litigation boutique.  Our primary expertise is the aggressive pursuit of litigation claims on behalf of our clients.  In addition to representing institutions and other investor plaintiffs in class action security litigation, the firm’s expertise includes general corporate and commercial litigation, as well as securities arbitration.   Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Contact:
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Peretz Bronstein or Yael Hurwitz
212-697-6484 | [email protected]

Read more...
INVESTOR ALERT: Lundin Law PC Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit Against The Western Union Company and Encourages Investors with Losses to Contact the Firm

LOS ANGELES, March 24, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Lundin Law PC, a shareholder rights firm announces a class action lawsuit against The Western Union Company (“Western Union” or the “Company”) (:WU), Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Western Union securities on the open market between February 24, 2012 and January 19, 2017, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), are advised to contact the firm prior to the March 27, 2017 lead plaintiff deadline.
To participate in this class action lawsuit, click here, or call Brian Lundin, Esquire, of Lundin Law PC, at 888-713-1033, or e-mail him at [email protected]. No class has been certified in the above action yet. Until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. You may choose to take no action and remain a passive class member. On January 19, 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission disclosed that Western Union admitted to “aiding and abetting wire fraud” by allowing illicit money transfers to benefit human traffickers, money laundering schemes, and otherwise enable the transfer of “dirty money.” Western Union also admitted agents were covering money laundering transactions to avoid getting caught. The Company has agreed on a $586 million settlement. When this information was disclosed to the investing public, the value of Western Union stock fell sharply, causing investors harm. Lundin Law PC was established by Brian Lundin, a securities litigator based in Los Angeles dedicated to upholding shareholders' rights. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.
Contact:

Lundin Law PC
Brian Lundin, Esq.
Telephone: 888-713-1033
Facsimile: 888-713-1125
[email protected]

Read more...
WU SHAREHOLDER ALERT: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong Reminds Investors of a Class Action Involving The Western Union Company and a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of March 27, 2017
NEW YORK, March 21, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that a class action lawsuit has been commenced in the USDC for the Southern District of New York on behalf of investors who purchased The Western Union Company (:WU) securities between February 24, 2012 and January 19, 2017.
Click here to learn about the case: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra/the-western-union-company. There is no cost or obligation to you.According to the complaint, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the Company’s fraud prevention efforts did not comply with applicable laws; (2) Western Union knowingly failed to maintain an effective anti-money laundering program; (3) Western Union aided and abetted wire fraud; (4) for at least five years, Western Union knew of agents structuring transactions designed to avoid the reporting requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act; (5) Western Union was not compliant with its regulatory responsibilities; (6) between 2004 and 2012, Western Union violated U.S. laws by processing transactions for its agents and others involved in an international consumer fraud scheme; and (7) Western Union knew of but failed to take corrective action against its agents involved in or facilitating fraud-related transactions.If you suffered a loss in Western Union you have until March 27, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. To obtain additional information, contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email [email protected], by telephone at 212.425.1140, or visit http://www.wongesq.com/pslra/the-western-union-company.Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced attorney that has represented investors in securities litigations involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights.  Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
CONTACT:
Vincent Wong, Esq.
39 East Broadway
Suite 304
New York, NY 10002
Tel. 212.425.1140
Fax. 866.699.3880
E-Mail: [email protected]

Read more...
INVESTOR ALERT: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Reminds Investors of The Western Union Company of a Class Action Lawsuit and a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of March 27, 2017 – WU

NEW YORK, March 17, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The following statement is being issued by Levi & Korsinsky, LLP:
To: All persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired securities of The Western Union Company (“Western Union”) (:WU) between February 24, 2012 and January 19, 2017. You are hereby notified that a securities class action lawsuit has been commenced in the USDC for the Southern District of New York. To get more information go to: http://www.zlk.com/pslra/the-western-union-company or contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. either via email at [email protected] or by telephone at (212) 363-7500, toll-free: (877) 363-5972. There is no cost or obligation to you. The complaint alleges that, among other allegations, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the Company’s fraud prevention efforts did not comply with applicable laws; (2) Western Union knowingly failed to maintain an effective anti-money laundering program; (3) Western Union aided and abetted wire fraud; (4) for at least five years, Western Union knew of agents structuring transactions designed to avoid the reporting requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act; (5) Western Union was not compliant with its regulatory responsibilities; (6) between 2004 and 2012, Western Union violated U.S. laws by processing transactions for its agents and others involved in an international consumer fraud scheme; and (7) Western Union knew of but failed to take corrective action against its agents involved in or facilitating fraud-related transactions. If you suffered a loss in Western Union you have until March 27, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. Levi & Korsinsky is a national firm with offices in New York, California, Connecticut, and Washington D.C. The firm’s attorneys have extensive expertise and experience representing investors in securities litigation involving financial fraud, and have recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
CONTACT:
Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
Joseph E. Levi, Esq.
30 Broad Street - 24th Floor
New York, NY 10004
Tel: (212) 363-7500
Toll Free: (877) 363-5972
Fax: (212) 363-7171
www.zlk.com

Read more...
SHAREHOLDER ALERT:  Pomerantz Law Firm Reminds Shareholders with Losses on their Investment in The Western Union Company of Class Action Lawsuit and Upcoming Deadline – WU

NEW YORK, March 10, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Pomerantz LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against The Western Union Company (“Western Union” or the “Company”) (:WU) and certain of its officers.   The class action, filed in United States District Court, District of Colorado, and docketed under 17-cv-00474, is on behalf of a class consisting of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Western Union securities, seeking to recover compensable damages caused by defendants’ violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
If you are a shareholder who purchased Western Union securities between February 24, 2012 and January 19, 2017, both dates inclusive, you have until March 27, 2017 to ask the Court to appoint you as Lead Plaintiff for the class.  A copy of the Complaint can be obtained at www.pomerantzlaw.com.   To discuss this action, contact Robert S. Willoughby at [email protected] or 888.476.6529 (or 888.4-POMLAW), toll free, ext. 9980. Those who inquire by e-mail are encouraged to include their mailing address, telephone number, and number of shares purchased. [Click here to join this class action] The Western Union Company provides money movement and payment services worldwide. The Company operates in three segments: Consumer-to-Consumer, Consumer-to-Business, and Business Solutions. The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s business, operational and compliance policies. Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:  (i) Western Union’s fraud prevention efforts did not comply with applicable laws; (ii) Western Union willfully failed to maintain an effective anti-money laundering program; (iii) Western Union aided and abetted wire fraud; (iv) for at least five years, Western Union knew of agents structuring transactions designed to avoid the reporting requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act; (v) Western Union was not compliant with its regulatory responsibilities; (vi) between 2004 and 2012, Western Union violated U.S. laws—the Bank Secrecy Act and anti-fraud statutes—by processing hundreds of thousands of transactions for Western Union agents and others involved in an international consumer fraud scheme; (vii) Western Union knew of but failed to take corrective action against Western Union agents involved in or facilitating fraud-related transactions; (viii) between January 1, 2004 and August 29, 2015, Western Union received at least 550,928 complaints about fraud-induced money transfers, totaling at least $632,721,044; and (ix) as a result of the foregoing, Western Union’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. On January 19, 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission announced that Western Union had agreed to pay $586 million and admitted to “aiding and abetting wire fraud” by allowing scammers to process transactions even when the Company realized that its agents were disguising transactions to avoid detection. On this news, Western Union’s share price fell $0.87, or 3.9%, over two trading days, to close at $20.98 on January 20, 2017. The Pomerantz Firm, with offices in New York, Chicago, Florida, and Los Angeles, is acknowledged as one of the premier firms in the areas of corporate, securities, and antitrust class litigation. Founded by the late Abraham L. Pomerantz, known as the dean of the class action bar, the Pomerantz Firm pioneered the field of securities class actions. Today, more than 80 years later, the Pomerantz Firm continues in the tradition he established, fighting for the rights of the victims of securities fraud, breaches of fiduciary duty, and corporate misconduct. The Firm has recovered numerous multimillion-dollar damages awards on behalf of class members. See www.pomerantzlaw.com.
CONTACT:
Robert S. Willoughby
Pomerantz LLP
[email protected]

Read more...
WU ALERT: Rosen Law Firm Reminds The Western Union Company Investors of Important Deadline in First Filed Action - WU

NEW YORK, March 10, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of The Western Union Company securities (:WU) from February 24, 2012 through January 19, 2017, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”) of the important March 27, 2017 lead plaintiff deadline in the first filed class action by Rosen Law Firm. The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for Western Union investors under the federal securities laws. To join the Western Union class action, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-1032.html or call Phillip Kim, Esq. or Kevin Chan, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] or [email protected] for information on the class action. NO CLASS HAS YET BEEN CERTIFIED IN THE ABOVE ACTION. UNTIL A CLASS IS CERTIFIED, YOU ARE NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL UNLESS YOU RETAIN ONE. YOU MAY ALSO REMAIN AN ABSENT CLASS MEMBER AND DO NOTHING AT THIS POINT. YOU MAY RETAIN COUNSEL OF YOUR CHOICE. According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Western Union’s fraud prevention efforts did not comply with applicable laws; (2) Western Union willfully failed to maintain an effective anti-money laundering program; (3) Western Union aided and abetted wire fraud; (4) for at least five years, Western Union knew of agents structuring transactions designed to avoid the reporting requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act; (5) Western Union was not compliant with its regulatory responsibilities; (6) between 2004 and 2012, Western Union violated U.S. laws—the Bank Secrecy Act and anti-fraud statutes—by processing hundreds of thousands of transactions for Western Union agents and others involved in an international consumer fraud scheme; (7) Western Union knew of but failed to take corrective action against Western Union agents involved in or facilitating fraud-related transactions; (8) between January 1, 2004 and August 29, 2015, Western Union received at least 550,928 complaints about fraud-induced money transfers, totaling at least $632,721,044; and (9) as a result, Defendants’ public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than March 27, 2017. If you wish to join the litigation, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-1032.html or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Phillip Kim or Kevin Chan of Rosen Law Firm toll free at 866-767-3653 or via email at [email protected] or [email protected]. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm or on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm. Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation.  Attorney Advertising.  Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.  

Contact Information:

Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
Kevin Chan, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
www.rosenlegal.com


Read more...
INVESTOR ALERT: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Reminds Investors of The Western Union Company of a Class Action Lawsuit and a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of March 27, 2017 – WU

NEW YORK, March 03, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The following statement is being issued by Levi & Korsinsky, LLP:
To: All persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired securities of The Western Union Company (“Western Union”) (:WU) between February 24, 2012 and January 19, 2017. You are hereby notified that a securities class action lawsuit has been commenced in the USDC for the Southern District of New York. To get more information go to: http://www.zlk.com/pslra/the-western-union-company  or contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. either via email at [email protected] or by telephone at (212) 363-7500, toll-free: (877) 363-5972. There is no cost or obligation to you. The complaint alleges that, among other allegations, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the Company’s fraud prevention efforts did not comply with applicable laws; (2) Western Union knowingly failed to maintain an effective anti-money laundering program; (3) Western Union aided and abetted wire fraud; (4) for at least five years, Western Union knew of agents structuring transactions designed to avoid the reporting requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act; (5) Western Union was not compliant with its regulatory responsibilities; (6) between 2004 and 2012, Western Union violated U.S. laws by processing transactions for its agents and others involved in an international consumer fraud scheme; and (7) Western Union knew of but failed to take corrective action against its agents involved in or facilitating fraud-related transactions. If you suffered a loss in Western Union you have until March 27, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. Levi & Korsinsky is a national firm with offices in New York, New Jersey, California, Connecticut, and Washington D.C. The firm’s attorneys have extensive expertise and experience representing investors in securities litigation involving financial fraud, and have recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
CONTACT:   
Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
Joseph E. Levi, Esq.
30 Broad Street - 24th Floor
New York, NY 10004           
Tel: (212) 363-7500
Toll Free:  (877) 363-5972
Fax: (212) 363-7171
www.zlk.com

Read more...
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Announces the Filing of a Class Action against The Western Union Company and Certain Officers – WU

NEW YORK, Feb. 23, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Pomerantz LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against The Western Union Company (“Western Union” or the “Company”) (NYSE:NYSE:WU) and certain of its officers.   The class action, filed in United States District Court, District of Colorado, and docketed under 17-cv-00474, is on behalf of a class consisting of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Western Union securities, seeking to recover compensable damages caused by defendants’ violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
If you are a shareholder who purchased Western Union securities between February 24, 2012 and January 19, 2017, both dates inclusive, you have until March 27, 2017 to ask the Court to appoint you as Lead Plaintiff for the class.  A copy of the Complaint can be obtained at www.pomerantzlaw.com.   To discuss this action, contact Robert S. Willoughby at [email protected] or 888.476.6529 (or 888.4-POMLAW), toll free, ext. 9980. Those who inquire by e-mail are encouraged to include their mailing address, telephone number, and number of shares purchased.  [Click here to join this class action] The Western Union Company provides money movement and payment services worldwide. The Company operates in three segments: Consumer-to-Consumer, Consumer-to-Business, and Business Solutions. The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s business, operational and compliance policies. Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:  (i) Western Union’s fraud prevention efforts did not comply with applicable laws; (ii) Western Union willfully failed to maintain an effective anti-money laundering program; (iii) Western Union aided and abetted wire fraud; (iv) for at least five years, Western Union knew of agents structuring transactions designed to avoid the reporting requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act; (v) Western Union was not compliant with its regulatory responsibilities; (vi) between 2004 and 2012, Western Union violated U.S. laws—the Bank Secrecy Act and anti-fraud statutes—by processing hundreds of thousands of transactions for Western Union agents and others involved in an international consumer fraud scheme; (vii) Western Union knew of but failed to take corrective action against Western Union agents involved in or facilitating fraud-related transactions; (viii) between January 1, 2004 and August 29, 2015, Western Union received at least 550,928 complaints about fraud-induced money transfers, totaling at least $632,721,044; and (ix) as a result of the foregoing, Western Union’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. On January 19, 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission announced that Western Union had agreed to pay $586 million and admitted to “aiding and abetting wire fraud” by allowing scammers to process transactions even when the Company realized that its agents were disguising transactions to avoid detection. On this news, Western Union’s share price fell $0.87, or 3.9%, over two trading days, to close at $20.98 on January 20, 2017. The Pomerantz Firm, with offices in New York, Chicago, Florida, and Los Angeles, is acknowledged as one of the premier firms in the areas of corporate, securities, and antitrust class litigation. Founded by the late Abraham L. Pomerantz, known as the dean of the class action bar, the Pomerantz Firm pioneered the field of securities class actions. Today, more than 80 years later, the Pomerantz Firm continues in the tradition he established, fighting for the rights of the victims of securities fraud, breaches of fiduciary duty, and corporate misconduct. The Firm has recovered numerous multimillion-dollar damages awards on behalf of class members. See www.pomerantzlaw.com
CONTACT:
Robert S. Willoughby
Pomerantz LLP
[email protected]


Read more...
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Brower Piven Encourages Investors Who Have Losses In Excess Of $100,000 From Investment In Western Union Company (WU) To Contact Brower Piven Before The Lead Plaintiff Deadline In Class Action Lawsuit

STEVENSON, Md., Feb. 21, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The securities litigation law firm of Brower Piven, A Professional Corporation, announces that a class action lawsuit has been commenced in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of purchasers of The Western Union Company (NYSE:NYSE:WU) (“Western Union” or the “Company”) securities during the period between February 24, 2012 and January 19, 2017, inclusive (the “Class Period”).  Investors who wish to become proactively involved in the litigation have until March 27, 2017 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff.
If you wish to choose counsel to represent you and the Class, you must apply to be appointed lead plaintiff and be selected by the Court.  The lead plaintiff will direct the litigation and participate in important decisions including whether to accept a settlement for the Class in the action.  The lead plaintiff will be selected from among applicants claiming the largest loss from investment in Western Union securities during the Class Period.  Members of the Class will be represented by the lead plaintiff and counsel chosen by the lead plaintiff.  No class has yet been certified in the above action. The complaint accuses the defendants of violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by virtue of the defendants’ failure to disclose during the Class Period that: the Company’s fraud prevention efforts did not comply with applicable laws; it knowingly failed to maintain an effective anti-money laundering program; it aided and abetted wire fraud, for at least five years; it knew of agents structuring transactions designed to avoid the reporting requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act; it was not compliant with its regulatory responsibilities; between 2004 and 2012, it violated U.S. laws by processing transactions for its agents and others involved in an international consumer fraud scheme; and. it knew of, but failed to take corrective action, against its agents involved in or facilitating fraud-related transactions. According to the complaint, following a January 19, 2017 article that the Company agreed to pay $586 million to resolve criminal and civil charges and a U.S. Department of Justice announcement that the Company admitted that it failed to maintain an effective anti-money laundering program and aided and abetted wire fraud, the value of Western Union shares declined significantly. If you have suffered a loss in excess of $100,000 from investment in Western Union securities purchased on or after February 24, 2012 and held through the revelation of negative information during and/or at the end of the Class Period and would like to learn more about this lawsuit and your ability to participate as a lead plaintiff, without cost or obligation to you, please visit our website at http://www.browerpiven.com/currentsecuritiescases.html.  You may also request more information by contacting Brower Piven either by email at [email protected] or by telephone at (410) 415-6616.  Brower Piven also encourages anyone with information regarding the Company’s conduct during the period in question to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others. Attorneys at Brower Piven have extensive experience in litigating securities and other class action cases and have been advocating for the rights of shareholders since the 1980s.  If you choose to retain counsel, you may retain Brower Piven without financial obligation or cost to you, or you may retain other counsel of your choice.  You need take no action at this time to be a member of the class.
CONTACT: Charles J. Piven
Brower Piven, A Professional Corporation
1925 Old Valley Road
Stevenson, Maryland 21153
Telephone: 410-415-6616
[email protected]

Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 40.60
WU's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
78% of the 335 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 15.55 vs. WU: 40.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
WU' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.95  Med: 12.39 Max: 44.25
Current: 40.6
5.95
44.25
Forward PE Ratio 11.12
WU's Forward PE Ratio is ranked higher than
60% of the 50 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 13.76 vs. WU: 11.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 40.60
WU's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
77% of the 335 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 15.63 vs. WU: 40.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
WU' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.95  Med: 12.39 Max: 44.25
Current: 40.6
5.95
44.25
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 12.67
WU's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked higher than
55% of the 98 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 13.67 vs. WU: 12.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
WU' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7  Med: 11.53 Max: 22.36
Current: 12.67
7
22.36
PB Ratio 12.11
WU's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
95% of the 312 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.30 vs. WU: 12.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
WU' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.95  Med: 10.47 Max: 2364
Current: 12.11
5.95
2364
PS Ratio 1.72
WU's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
75% of the 393 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 3.73 vs. WU: 1.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
WU' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.3  Med: 1.98 Max: 4.15
Current: 1.72
1.3
4.15
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 13.21
WU's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
60% of the 83 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 8.05 vs. WU: 13.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
WU' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.13  Med: 12.01 Max: 28.33
Current: 13.21
6.13
28.33
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 10.20
WU's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
57% of the 104 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 8.91 vs. WU: 10.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
WU' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.85  Med: 9.83 Max: 22.56
Current: 10.2
5.85
22.56
EV-to-EBIT 18.54
WU's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
51% of the 344 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 18.99 vs. WU: 18.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
WU' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5  Med: 9.2 Max: 23.6
Current: 18.54
5
23.6
EV-to-EBITDA 11.96
WU's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
61% of the 348 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 16.26 vs. WU: 11.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
WU' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.3  Med: 7.8 Max: 17.9
Current: 11.96
4.3
17.9
Shiller PE Ratio 12.90
WU's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
67% of the 54 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 16.34 vs. WU: 12.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
WU' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.01  Med: 11.94 Max: 15.46
Current: 12.9
9.01
15.46
Current Ratio 0.91
WU's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
88% of the 317 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 3.18 vs. WU: 0.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
WU' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.79  Med: 1.15 Max: 2.03
Current: 0.91
0.79
2.03
Quick Ratio 0.91
WU's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
85% of the 316 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.91 vs. WU: 0.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
WU' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.79  Med: 1.15 Max: 2.03
Current: 0.91
0.79
2.03
Days Sales Outstanding 80.78
WU's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
73% of the 168 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 13.97 vs. WU: 80.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
WU' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.87  Med: 67.82 Max: 89.34
Current: 80.78
0.87
89.34

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 3.51
WU's Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
64% of the 304 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.81 vs. WU: 3.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
WU' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.04  Med: 1.93 Max: 3.73
Current: 3.51
0.04
3.73
Dividend Payout Ratio 1.39
WU's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked lower than
79% of the 168 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.34 vs. WU: 1.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
WU' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.03  Med: 0.22 Max: 1.39
Current: 1.39
0.03
1.39
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 8.60
WU's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked higher than
60% of the 109 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 5.60 vs. WU: 8.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
WU' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 13.4 Max: 97.9
Current: 8.6
0
97.9
Forward Dividend Yield % 3.67
WU's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
66% of the 296 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.96 vs. WU: 3.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 6.90
WU's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked higher than
76% of the 381 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 3.29 vs. WU: 6.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
WU' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.08  Med: 3.81 Max: 7.37
Current: 6.9
0.08
7.37
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 4.30
WU's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
94% of the 207 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: -1.20 vs. WU: 4.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
WU' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.5  Med: 4.3 Max: 0
Current: 4.3
-0.5
0

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 1.06
WU's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
52% of the 87 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.02 vs. WU: 1.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
WU' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.64  Med: 0.94 Max: 2.05
Current: 1.06
0.64
2.05
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) 3.79
WU's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) is ranked lower than
100% of the 21 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.86 vs. WU: 3.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) only.
N/A
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.87
WU's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
63% of the 374 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.00 vs. WU: 0.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
WU' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.74  Med: 1 Max: 1.97
Current: 0.87
0.74
1.97
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 5.39
WU's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
60% of the 419 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 3.85 vs. WU: 5.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
WU' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.2  Med: 10.9 Max: 19.8
Current: 5.39
4.2
19.8
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 3.00
WU's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
64% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Credit Services industry.

( Industry Median: 10.33 vs. WU: 3.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
WU' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.5  Med: 11.3 Max: 23.4
Current: 3
2.5
23.4

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $5,427.60
EPS (TTM) $ 0.47
Beta0.97
Short Percentage of Float13.63%
52-Week Range $18.42 - 22.70
Shares Outstanding (Mil)471.25

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 5,425 5,552 5,700
EPS ($) 1.73 1.81 1.91
EPS without NRI ($) 1.73 1.81 1.91
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
6.92%
Dividends per Share ($) 0.68 0.69 0.70
» More Articles for NYSE:WU

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Purcell Julie & Lefkowitz LLP Is Investigating The Western Union Company for Pote May 09 2017 
DEADLINE ALERT: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against The Wes Mar 24 2017 
INVESTOR ALERT: Lundin Law PC Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit Against The Western Union Co Mar 24 2017 
WU SHAREHOLDER ALERT: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong Reminds Investors of a Class Action Involving Mar 21 2017 
INVESTOR ALERT: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Reminds Investors of The Western Union Company of a Class Acti Mar 17 2017 
SHAREHOLDER ALERT:  Pomerantz Law Firm Reminds Shareholders with Losses on their Investment in Th Mar 10 2017 
WU ALERT: Rosen Law Firm Reminds The Western Union Company Investors of Important Deadline in First Mar 10 2017 
INVESTOR ALERT: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Reminds Investors of The Western Union Company of a Class Acti Mar 03 2017 
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Announces the Filing of a Class Action against The Western U Feb 23 2017 
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Brower Piven Encourages Investors Who Have Losses In Excess Of $100,000 From Inve Feb 21 2017 

More From Other Websites
How Western Union stays ahead of the competition in the $... Jul 20 2017
The Western Union Co. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : WU-US : July 20, 2017 Jul 20 2017
Western Union Announces $0.175 Quarterly Dividend Jul 12 2017
Impact of Brexit, US politics being felt by fintech firms, says Western Union’s head of... Jul 11 2017
Western Union Stock Continues to Lose Value: Here's Why Jul 07 2017
5 unappreciated stocks with high returns on invested capital Jul 06 2017
Western Union to Release Second Quarter Results on August 3, 2017 Jul 05 2017
Western Union Unveils Major Upgrade of Its Digital Payments Platform for International College... Jun 27 2017
ETFs with exposure to The Western Union Co. : June 26, 2017 Jun 26 2017
The Western Union Co. :WU-US: Earnings Analysis: Q1, 2017 By the Numbers : June 21, 2017 Jun 21 2017
Mastercard and Western Union Explore Digital Model for Refugee Camps Jun 20 2017
The Western Union Co. : WU-US: Dividend Analysis : June 16th, 2017 (record date) : By the numbers :... Jun 16 2017
For Western Union, Refugees and Immigrants Are the Ultimate Market Jun 16 2017
The Western Union Co. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : WU-US : June 14, 2017 Jun 14 2017
Will Western Union's (WU) Compliance Plan Save its Face? Jun 13 2017
Western Union and the Western Union Foundation Provide Humanitarian Relief to Yemen Jun 13 2017
Western Union and the Arizona Office of the Attorney General Announce Successful Completion of... Jun 12 2017
Zacks Industry Outlook Highlights: Western Union, MoneyGram International, Visa and MasterCard Jun 08 2017
A New Bill to Fund Trump's Border Wall Was Just Introduced, and You're Probably Going to... Jun 02 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}