Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany, Mexico

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.34
NYSE:ATW's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
52% of the 69 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.38 vs. NYSE:ATW: 0.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
NYSE:ATW' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.04  Med: 0.3 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.34
Equity-to-Asset 0.71
NYSE:ATW's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
77% of the 61 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.58 vs. NYSE:ATW: 0.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
NYSE:ATW' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.49  Med: 0.64 Max: 0.86
Current: 0.71
0.49
0.86
Interest Coverage 1.74
NYSE:ATW's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
79% of the 39 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 13.65 vs. NYSE:ATW: 1.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NYSE:ATW' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.74  Med: 61 Max: 173.48
Current: 1.74
1.74
173.48
Piotroski F-Score: 5
Altman Z-Score: 1.56
Beneish M-Score: -3.71
WACC vs ROIC
8.87%
2.10%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 15.83
NYSE:ATW's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
71% of the 63 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -3.07 vs. NYSE:ATW: 15.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
NYSE:ATW' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 15.83  Med: 40.47 Max: 50.95
Current: 15.83
15.83
50.95
Net Margin % 11.40
NYSE:ATW's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
80% of the 64 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -14.82 vs. NYSE:ATW: 11.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
NYSE:ATW' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.4  Med: 34.53 Max: 42.75
Current: 11.4
11.4
42.75
ROE % 2.61
NYSE:ATW's ROE % is ranked higher than
74% of the 65 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -6.13 vs. NYSE:ATW: 2.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
NYSE:ATW' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.61  Med: 17.43 Max: 29.52
Current: 2.61
2.61
29.52
ROA % 1.80
NYSE:ATW's ROA % is ranked higher than
76% of the 71 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -3.81 vs. NYSE:ATW: 1.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NYSE:ATW' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.8  Med: 11.93 Max: 23.7
Current: 1.8
1.8
23.7
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 4.07
NYSE:ATW's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
71% of the 69 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -3.66 vs. NYSE:ATW: 4.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NYSE:ATW' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.07  Med: 16.97 Max: 33.16
Current: 4.07
4.07
33.16
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -0.90
NYSE:ATW's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
78% of the 60 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -23.80 vs. NYSE:ATW: -0.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
NYSE:ATW' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -8.5  Med: 15.2 Max: 51.1
Current: -0.9
-8.5
51.1
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 0.50
NYSE:ATW's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
69% of the 54 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -15.40 vs. NYSE:ATW: 0.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
NYSE:ATW' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -20.7  Med: 21.8 Max: 64.4
Current: 0.5
-20.7
64.4
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -8.40
NYSE:ATW's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
59% of the 34 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -14.10 vs. NYSE:ATW: -8.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
NYSE:ATW' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -45.1  Med: 8.1 Max: 152.8
Current: -8.4
-45.1
152.8
GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with Atwood Oceanics Inc $NYSE:ATW.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NYSE:ATW's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-08-08 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - Drilling » Oil & Gas Drilling    NAICS: 213111    SIC: 1381
Compare:OTCPK:ESVIF, NYSE:SBR, NYSE:UNT, NYSE:NE, OTCPK:TDGCF, OTCPK:GFKSY, NYSE:SDLP, OTCPK:CESDF, NYSE:SDRL, OTCPK:SVGYF, OTCPK:ARHVF, NYSE:PES, NYSE:ICD, OTCPK:AWLCF, OTCPK:FOEAY, NYSE:NADL, OTCPK:STGAF, OTCPK:CETEF, NYSE:PACD, OTCPK:UREYF » details
Traded in other countries:AWZ.Germany, ATW.Mexico,
Headquarter Location:USA
Atwood Oceanics Inc is an offshore drilling contractor, engaged in drilling and completion of exploratory and developmental oil and gas wells.

Atwood Oceanics, Inc. is an offshore drilling company that offers drilling and completion of exploratory and development oil and gas wells. An array of unique drilling units is offered globally in the offshore market. Rig options can differ by operative depth of water, bottom condition, environment and geographical area, and by drilling and operating requirement. The main fleet options consist of deepwater semisubmersibles, jackups, and ultra-deepwater rigs. The majority of Atwood's revenue is derived globally from major integrated oil and natural gas companies and independent oil and gas companies.

Guru Investment Theses on Atwood Oceanics Inc

Bruce Berkowitz Comments on Atwood Oceanics - Jan 31, 2017

Stressed energy markets led us to invest in senior bonds of offshore driller Atwood Oceanics (NYSE:ATW). The bonds were purchased at attractive prices relative to the backlog of future cash flow from drilling operations and the value of Atwood’s modernized fleet. Thus far, Atwood has weathered tough conditions as the industry slowly rebalances between rig supply and demand in a lower commodity price environment. Atwood’s management has reduced cash operating costs by 25% while extending contracts with customers and suppliers. Atwood also reduced the outstanding senior bond class by over 30% through debt repurchases and raised liquidity through an equity offering. All actions combine to give us comfort that Atwood is positioned to capitalize on the eventual upcycle.



From Bruce Berkowitz (Trades, Portfolio)'s Fairholme Fund (Trades, Portfolio) annual shareholder letter 2016.

Check out Bruce Berkowitz latest stock trades

Bruce Berkowitz Comments on Atwood - Aug 02, 2016

The Funds own senior bonds of Atwood (NYSE:ATW) due 2020 with a 17% yield to maturity. Year-to-date, Atwood has retired over 30% these bonds due 2020 via open market purchases and a $150 million cash tender offer announced in late June. These events indicate that management believes it has the financial wherewithal to meet all obligations and take advantage of market mispricing. An existing $220 million cash balance, available credit line, and current contractual backlog provide ample liquidity. Atwood’s fleet of 11 high-spec rigs has a superb operating record and management continues to blend and extend transaction dates with both customers and suppliers.




From Bruce Berkowitz (Trades, Portfolio)'s first-half 2016 letter to shareholders.

Check out Bruce Berkowitz latest stock trades

FPA Capital Fund Comments on Atwood - Dec 09, 2015

During the third quarter, we sold our investment in Atwood (NYSE:ATW) and reinvested the proceeds in PTEN. There are many things to like about Atwood, including their young fleet of high-spec rigs, their significant revenue backlog, their industry leading margins and revenue efficiency, their track record of safe operations, and their seasoned board of directors. The problem with Atwood is they have debt maturing in the next three years. While we imagine the cycle may have turned by then, we always look for a margin of safety and have chosen to reinvest this capital into other energy names with more favorable balance sheets is beyond reproach. Unlike land drilling, if a rig runs out of work it costs a lot of money to store (particularly floating rigs). We do not know if the cycle will last beyond the time when the bulk of Atwood’s revenue backlog runs out. The recent credit facility amendment greatly reduced Atwood’s flexibility and puts shareholders in a position where if they guess wrong about when the cycle turns they may lose their entire investment. We were not willing to underwrite that.

By selling the shares of Atwood and reinvesting in Patterson we do give up some revenue backlog, but we pick up another well run dividend paying company at a discount to tangible book value with a much better balance sheet and greater liquidity. Crucially, it costs very little money to store Patterson’s land drilling rigs or pressure pumping equipment in a yard if either are idled. We have confidence that by selling Atwood and investing in Patterson we have reduced our downside risk. Recall that we executed a similar swap in the first quarter of this year, when we replaced our Ensco holding with Helmerich & Payne for the very same reasons: similar upside but significantly greater downside protection.

From FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio)'s third quarter 2015 letter to shareholders.

Check out FPA Capital Fund latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Atwood Oceanics Inc

WeissLaw LLP: The Atwood Oceanics, Inc. Merger May Not Be in the Best Interests of ATW Shareholders
Covered Call reports for Atwood Oceanics, Inc., iRobot, Micron, Palo Alto Networks and Tesla Motors include trade ideas that offer returns of 19% or more!
ATWOOD OCEANICS INVESTOR ALERT BY THE FORMER ATTORNEY GENERAL OF LOUISIANA: Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC Investigates Adequacy of Price and Process in Proposed Sale of Atwood Oceanics, Inc.
Harwood Feffer LLP Announces Investigation of Atwood Oceanics, Inc.
ATWOOD (ATW) ALERT: J&W Investigates Proposed Sale of Atwood Oceanics, Inc.; Are Shareholders Getting a Fair Price?
8 Stocks Van Den Berg Continues to Buy Guru increased these holdings in the last 2 quarters
Arnold Van Den Berg (Trades, Portfolio), a value investor, founded Century Management in 1974. In both first-quarter 2017 and fourth-quarter 2016 the guru bought shares in the following stocks. Read more...
Bruce Berkowitz Comments on Atwood Oceanics Guru stock highlight
Stressed energy markets led us to invest in senior bonds of offshore driller Atwood Oceanics (NYSE:ATW). The bonds were purchased at attractive prices relative to the backlog of future cash flow from drilling operations and the value of Atwood’s modernized fleet. Thus far, Atwood has weathered tough conditions as the industry slowly rebalances between rig supply and demand in a lower commodity price environment. Atwood’s management has reduced cash operating costs by 25% while extending contracts with customers and suppliers. Atwood also reduced the outstanding senior bond class by over 30% through debt repurchases and raised liquidity through an equity offering. All actions combine to give us comfort that Atwood is positioned to capitalize on the eventual upcycle. Read more...
22 Questions With Value Investor Jon Forbes 'Keep at it and be patient, trust your analysis so much that the immediate price is not something that will worry you'
1. How and why did you get started investing? What is your background? Read more...
Arnold Van Den Berg Makes One Buy and Three Large Increases in 3rd Quarter Outperforming fund reports portfolio
Century Management founder Arnold Van Den Berg (Trades, Portfolio) added one new stock to his portfolio and made significant increases to his positions in three others in the third quarter, he reported Monday. Read more...
Atwood: Offshore Oil Company Value With Upside Potential Atwood is a value at its current $9 per share, with the opportunity to double in the next 12 months
Atwood Industries is an offshore oil rig company. It owns 11 offshore drilling units in the U.S., Mediterranean Sea, offshore West Africa, Southeast Asia and Australia. In addition to the 11 rigs in fleet, it has two more ultra-deepwater rigs under construction in South Korea, scheduled for completion on September 2017 and June 2018. Ultra-deepwater rigs generate the most revenue for Atwood (52%) while making up 47% of drilling costs. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 6.14
ATW's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
52% of the 23 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 15.72 vs. ATW: 6.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
ATW' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.86  Med: 9.55 Max: 22.32
Current: 6.14
0.86
22.32
PE Ratio without NRI 6.14
ATW's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
52% of the 23 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 15.72 vs. ATW: 6.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
ATW' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.86  Med: 9.55 Max: 22.34
Current: 6.14
0.86
22.34
PB Ratio 0.20
ATW's PB Ratio is ranked higher than
88% of the 60 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.56 vs. ATW: 0.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
ATW' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.12  Med: 1.58 Max: 5.07
Current: 0.2
0.12
5.07
PS Ratio 0.77
ATW's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
56% of the 62 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.84 vs. ATW: 0.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
ATW' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.27  Med: 3.54 Max: 8.06
Current: 0.77
0.27
8.06
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 2.51
ATW's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
57% of the 30 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 3.21 vs. ATW: 2.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
ATW' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.09  Med: 24.73 Max: 445.93
Current: 2.51
1.09
445.93
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 1.30
ATW's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
74% of the 42 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. ATW: 1.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
ATW' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.58  Med: 7.85 Max: 20.62
Current: 1.3
0.58
20.62
EV-to-EBIT 8.63
ATW's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
55% of the 31 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 7.32 vs. ATW: 8.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
ATW' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3  Med: 9.5 Max: 21
Current: 8.63
3
21
EV-to-EBITDA 4.47
ATW's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
67% of the 46 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 7.67 vs. ATW: 4.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
ATW' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.4  Med: 7.85 Max: 15.9
Current: 4.47
2.4
15.9
PEG Ratio 0.53
ATW's PEG Ratio is ranked lower than
63% of the 8 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.50 vs. ATW: 0.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
ATW' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.05  Med: 0.44 Max: 3.23
Current: 0.53
0.05
3.23
Shiller PE Ratio 1.88
ATW's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
87% of the 16 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 5.78 vs. ATW: 1.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
ATW' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.32  Med: 18.89 Max: 68.83
Current: 1.88
1.32
68.83
Current Ratio 12.18
ATW's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
89% of the 71 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 1.97 vs. ATW: 12.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
ATW' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.61  Med: 2.95 Max: 12.18
Current: 12.18
0.61
12.18
Quick Ratio 10.22
ATW's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
89% of the 71 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 1.71 vs. ATW: 10.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
ATW' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.49  Med: 2.42 Max: 11.23
Current: 10.22
0.49
11.23
Days Inventory 128.38
ATW's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
81% of the 47 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 35.53 vs. ATW: 128.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
ATW' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 47.68  Med: 77.38 Max: 128.38
Current: 128.38
47.68
128.38
Days Sales Outstanding 40.17
ATW's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
80% of the 51 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 65.65 vs. ATW: 40.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
ATW' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 40.17  Med: 72.41 Max: 94.08
Current: 40.17
40.17
94.08
Days Payable 27.89
ATW's Days Payable is ranked lower than
76% of the 45 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 49.09 vs. ATW: 27.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
ATW' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 22.7  Med: 49.79 Max: 184.52
Current: 27.89
22.7
184.52

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 0.74
ATW's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
65% of the 89 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 5.70 vs. ATW: 0.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
ATW' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.73  Med: 3.07 Max: 14.65
Current: 0.74
0.73
14.65
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -0.40
ATW's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
67% of the 51 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -2.60 vs. ATW: -0.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
ATW' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -19.9  Med: -0.6 Max: 0.4
Current: -0.4
-19.9
0.4

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 0.20
ATW's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked higher than
88% of the 57 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.61 vs. ATW: 0.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
ATW' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.17  Med: 1.53 Max: 6.22
Current: 0.2
0.17
6.22
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 0.41
ATW's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
66% of the 32 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.76 vs. ATW: 0.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
ATW' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.41  Med: 4.54 Max: 71.4
Current: 0.41
0.41
71.4
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) 0.38
ATW's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) is ranked lower than
100% of the 1 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.00 vs. ATW: 0.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) only.
N/A
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.22
ATW's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
75% of the 61 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.57 vs. ATW: 0.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
ATW' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.13  Med: 0.85 Max: 2.42
Current: 0.22
0.13
2.42
Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value 0.77
ATW's Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value is ranked lower than
60% of the 5 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. ATW: 0.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value only.
ATW' s Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.09  Med: 0.66 Max: 3.07
Current: 0.77
0.09
3.07
Price-to-Graham-Number 0.23
ATW's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked higher than
71% of the 17 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. ATW: 0.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
ATW' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.11  Med: 1.15 Max: 3.67
Current: 0.23
0.11
3.67
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 11.56
ATW's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
76% of the 70 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -2.15 vs. ATW: 11.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
ATW' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.8  Med: 10.5 Max: 33.4
Current: 11.56
4.8
33.4
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -12.42
ATW's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
55% of the 31 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -6.43 vs. ATW: -12.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
ATW' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -51.3  Med: 10.1 Max: 50
Current: -12.42
-51.3
50

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $741.74
EPS (TTM) $ 1.37
Beta2.82
Short Percentage of Float62.16%
52-Week Range $6.12 - 15.37
Shares Outstanding (Mil)80.52

Analyst Estimate

Sep17 Sep18 Sep19
Revenue (Mil $) 488 349 388
EPS ($) -1.67 -2.94 -2.38
EPS without NRI ($) -1.67 -2.94 -2.38
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($)
» More Articles for ATW

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Annaly Capital Management: Attractive 9.5% Dividend Yield, but Interest Rates Are a Major Risk Jun 25 2017 
Never a Better Time to Pile on Chipotle Jun 25 2017 
Boeing Takes Lead Over Airbus With $30 Billion Worth of Orders on Day 1 of Paris Air Show Jun 25 2017 
Berkshire Hathaway’s Recent Investment: Home Capital Group Jun 25 2017 
Stocks That Fell to 3-Year Lows in the Week of June 23 Jun 24 2017 
Weekly Top Insider Buys Highlight for the Week of June 23 Jun 24 2017 
ID Watchdog Announces Special and Annual General Meeting Date and Record Date Jun 23 2017 
Ironclad Performance Wear Postpones 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders Jun 23 2017 
Delta and Korean Air Create Leading trans-Pacific Joint Venture Jun 23 2017 
Harwood Feffer LLP Announces Investigation of EnerNOC, Inc. Jun 23 2017 

More From Other Websites
Offshore Drillers: Analysts’ Target Prices and Recommendations Jun 27 2017
Atwood Oceanics Downgraded, Ensco Upgraded ahead of Merger Jun 27 2017
US Crude Oil Rig Count: Turning Point for the Bear Market? Jun 26 2017
US Natural Gas Rig Count, Production, and Consumption Jun 26 2017
Atwood Oceanics, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : ATW-US : June 21,... Jun 21 2017
Why Ensco's Management Thinks It's the Right Time to Buy Atwood Oceanics Jun 20 2017
ETFs with exposure to Atwood Oceanics, Inc. : June 19, 2017 Jun 19 2017
Why Is the US Natural Gas Rig Count at a 30-Month High? Jun 19 2017
Atwood Oceanics, Inc. :ATW-US: Earnings Analysis: Q2, 2017 By the Numbers : June 16, 2017 Jun 16 2017
How Analysts Reacted to Ensco’s Acquisition Jun 08 2017
Analyzing Ensco’s Acquisition of Atwood Jun 07 2017
Last Week’s Key Updates from the Offshore Drilling Space Jun 07 2017
INVESTOR ALERT: Brower Piven Commences An Investigation Into The Proposed Sale Of Atwood Oceanics,... Jun 07 2017
Oil & Gas Stock Roundup: Ensco Snaps Up Atwood, Dakota Access Pipeline in Service Jun 06 2017
These Stocks Have Changed Direction Jun 05 2017
Will President Trump Boost the US Crude Oil Rig Count? Jun 05 2017
INVESTOR ALERT: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Announces an Investigation Into Whether the Sale of Atwood... Jun 02 2017
WeissLaw LLP: The Atwood Oceanics, Inc. Merger May Not Be in the Best Interests of ATW Shareholders Jun 02 2017
ATWOOD OCEANICS INVESTOR ALERT BY THE FORMER ATTORNEY GENERAL OF LOUISIANA: Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC... Jun 01 2017
Is Atwood Acquisition Positive for Ensco? Jun 01 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}