Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany, Mexico

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.37
NYSE:ATW's Cash-to-Debt is ranked higher than
50% of the 62 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.37 vs. NYSE:ATW: 0.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
NYSE:ATW' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.04  Med: 0.29 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.37
Equity-to-Asset 0.70
NYSE:ATW's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
79% of the 57 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.50 vs. NYSE:ATW: 0.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
NYSE:ATW' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.49  Med: 0.64 Max: 0.86
Current: 0.7
0.49
0.86
Debt-to-Equity 0.38
NYSE:ATW's Debt-to-Equity is ranked higher than
69% of the 45 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.52 vs. NYSE:ATW: 0.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-Equity only.
NYSE:ATW' s Debt-to-Equity Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.03  Med: 0.43 Max: 0.88
Current: 0.38
0.03
0.88
Debt-to-EBITDA 5.98
NYSE:ATW's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
61% of the 41 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 4.28 vs. NYSE:ATW: 5.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-EBITDA only.
NYSE:ATW' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.09  Med: 1.77 Max: 5.98
Current: 5.98
0.09
5.98
Interest Coverage 0.64
NYSE:ATW's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
97% of the 38 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 8.53 vs. NYSE:ATW: 0.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NYSE:ATW' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.64  Med: 61 Max: 173.48
Current: 0.64
0.64
173.48
Piotroski F-Score: 4
Altman Z-Score: 1.47
Beneish M-Score: -3.49
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 6.22
NYSE:ATW's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
68% of the 59 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -3.57 vs. NYSE:ATW: 6.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
NYSE:ATW' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.22  Med: 40.47 Max: 50.95
Current: 6.22
6.22
50.95
Net Margin % -3.06
NYSE:ATW's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
58% of the 60 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -13.44 vs. NYSE:ATW: -3.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
NYSE:ATW' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.06  Med: 34.53 Max: 42.75
Current: -3.06
-3.06
42.75
ROE % -0.58
NYSE:ATW's ROE % is ranked higher than
65% of the 60 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -5.84 vs. NYSE:ATW: -0.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
NYSE:ATW' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.58  Med: 17.43 Max: 29.52
Current: -0.58
-0.58
29.52
ROA % -0.41
NYSE:ATW's ROA % is ranked higher than
68% of the 66 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -3.33 vs. NYSE:ATW: -0.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NYSE:ATW' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.41  Med: 11.93 Max: 23.7
Current: -0.41
-0.41
23.7
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 1.16
NYSE:ATW's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
58% of the 64 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -1.23 vs. NYSE:ATW: 1.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NYSE:ATW' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.16  Med: 16.97 Max: 33.16
Current: 1.16
1.16
33.16
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -0.90
NYSE:ATW's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
81% of the 59 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -23.80 vs. NYSE:ATW: -0.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
NYSE:ATW' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -8.5  Med: 15.2 Max: 51.1
Current: -0.9
-8.5
51.1
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 0.50
NYSE:ATW's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
76% of the 54 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -19.80 vs. NYSE:ATW: 0.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
NYSE:ATW' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -20.7  Med: 21.8 Max: 64.4
Current: 0.5
-20.7
64.4
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -8.40
NYSE:ATW's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
59% of the 37 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -14.50 vs. NYSE:ATW: -8.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
NYSE:ATW' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -45.1  Med: 8.1 Max: 152.8
Current: -8.4
-45.1
152.8
GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Signs with Atwood Oceanics Inc NYSE:ATW.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NYSE:ATW's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2018-02-03 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q4 2016

ATW Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Chuck Royce 248,050 sh (+82.51%)
Jeremy Grantham 112,581 sh (+75.45%)
Arnold Van Den Berg 2,108,799 sh (+13.44%)
Joel Greenblatt 703,121 sh (+7.07%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
» More
Q1 2017

ATW Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Paul Tudor Jones 31,500 sh (New)
Charles Brandes 12,283 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 1,876,400 sh (New)
Arnold Van Den Berg 2,631,439 sh (+24.78%)
Steven Cohen 150,000 sh (unchged)
Chuck Royce Sold Out
Jeremy Grantham 46,800 sh (-58.43%)
Joel Greenblatt 195,868 sh (-72.14%)
» More
Q2 2017

ATW Guru Trades in Q2 2017

Jeremy Grantham 97,240 sh (+107.78%)
Charles Brandes 12,283 sh (unchged)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Arnold Van Den Berg 2,567,209 sh (-2.44%)
Joel Greenblatt 11,156 sh (-94.30%)
Steven Cohen 20,800 sh (-98.89%)
» More
Q3 2017

ATW Guru Trades in Q3 2017

Chuck Royce 2,058 sh (New)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 20,181 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 12,784 sh (+14.59%)
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Charles Brandes Sold Out
Arnold Van Den Berg 2,561,779 sh (-0.21%)
Jeremy Grantham 84,740 sh (-12.85%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with ATW

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
Arnold Van Den Berg 2017-09-30 Reduce -0.21%0.01%$6.04 - $9.2 $ 9.3224%2,561,779
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 2017-09-30 New Buy$6.04 - $9.2 $ 9.3224%20,181
Joel Greenblatt 2017-09-30 Add 14.59%$6.04 - $9.2 $ 9.3224%12,784
Charles Brandes 2017-09-30 Sold Out $6.04 - $9.2 $ 9.3224%0
Arnold Van Den Berg 2017-06-30 Reduce -2.44%0.09%$7.18 - $10.23 $ 9.328%2,567,209
Joel Greenblatt 2017-06-30 Reduce -94.30%0.02%$7.18 - $10.23 $ 9.328%11,156
Arnold Van Den Berg 2017-03-31 Add 24.78%0.74%$8.92 - $14.05 $ 9.32-17%2,631,439
Joel Greenblatt 2017-03-31 Reduce -72.14%0.09%$8.92 - $14.05 $ 9.32-17%195,868
Charles Brandes 2017-03-31 New Buy$8.92 - $14.05 $ 9.32-17%12,283
Arnold Van Den Berg 2016-12-31 Add 13.44%0.52%$7.14 - $13.98 $ 9.32-5%2,108,799
Joel Greenblatt 2016-12-31 Add 7.07%0.01%$7.14 - $13.98 $ 9.32-5%703,121
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 2016-12-31 Sold Out $7.14 - $13.98 $ 9.32-5%0
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!
Premium More recent guru trades are included for USA Subscribe Members only!!
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - Drilling » Oil & Gas Drilling    NAICS: 213111    SIC: 1381
Compare:TSX:ESI, OSL:ODL, NYSE:SBR, NYSE:UNT, OSL:SONG, NYSE:NE, SZSE:002828, NYSE:SDLP, TSE:1606, TSX:TDG, TSE:1662, STC:PVD, OSL:ARCHER, NSE:ABAN, LSE:PANR, OSL:FOE, MIC:VJGZ, NYSE:PES, OSL:SDRL, LSE:BLVN » details
Traded in other countries:AWZ.Germany, ATW.Mexico,
Headquarter Location:USA
Atwood Oceanics Inc is engaged in the oil & gas sector. Its core business involves offshore offshore drilling and completion of developmental oil and gas wells.

Atwood Oceanics, Inc. is an offshore drilling company that offers drilling and completion of exploratory and development oil and gas wells. An array of unique drilling units is offered globally in the offshore market. Rig options can differ by operative depth of water, bottom condition, environment and geographical area, and by drilling and operating requirement. The main fleet options consist of deepwater semisubmersibles, jackups, and ultra-deepwater rigs. The majority of Atwood's revenue is derived globally from major integrated oil and natural gas companies and independent oil and gas companies.

Guru Investment Theses on Atwood Oceanics Inc

Bruce Berkowitz Comments on Atwood Oceanics - Jan 31, 2017

Stressed energy markets led us to invest in senior bonds of offshore driller Atwood Oceanics (NYSE:ATW). The bonds were purchased at attractive prices relative to the backlog of future cash flow from drilling operations and the value of Atwood’s modernized fleet. Thus far, Atwood has weathered tough conditions as the industry slowly rebalances between rig supply and demand in a lower commodity price environment. Atwood’s management has reduced cash operating costs by 25% while extending contracts with customers and suppliers. Atwood also reduced the outstanding senior bond class by over 30% through debt repurchases and raised liquidity through an equity offering. All actions combine to give us comfort that Atwood is positioned to capitalize on the eventual upcycle.



From Bruce Berkowitz (Trades, Portfolio)'s Fairholme Fund (Trades, Portfolio) annual shareholder letter 2016.

Check out Bruce Berkowitz latest stock trades

Bruce Berkowitz Comments on Atwood - Aug 02, 2016

The Funds own senior bonds of Atwood (NYSE:ATW) due 2020 with a 17% yield to maturity. Year-to-date, Atwood has retired over 30% these bonds due 2020 via open market purchases and a $150 million cash tender offer announced in late June. These events indicate that management believes it has the financial wherewithal to meet all obligations and take advantage of market mispricing. An existing $220 million cash balance, available credit line, and current contractual backlog provide ample liquidity. Atwood’s fleet of 11 high-spec rigs has a superb operating record and management continues to blend and extend transaction dates with both customers and suppliers.




From Bruce Berkowitz (Trades, Portfolio)'s first-half 2016 letter to shareholders.

Check out Bruce Berkowitz latest stock trades

FPA Capital Fund Comments on Atwood - Dec 09, 2015

During the third quarter, we sold our investment in Atwood (NYSE:ATW) and reinvested the proceeds in PTEN. There are many things to like about Atwood, including their young fleet of high-spec rigs, their significant revenue backlog, their industry leading margins and revenue efficiency, their track record of safe operations, and their seasoned board of directors. The problem with Atwood is they have debt maturing in the next three years. While we imagine the cycle may have turned by then, we always look for a margin of safety and have chosen to reinvest this capital into other energy names with more favorable balance sheets is beyond reproach. Unlike land drilling, if a rig runs out of work it costs a lot of money to store (particularly floating rigs). We do not know if the cycle will last beyond the time when the bulk of Atwood’s revenue backlog runs out. The recent credit facility amendment greatly reduced Atwood’s flexibility and puts shareholders in a position where if they guess wrong about when the cycle turns they may lose their entire investment. We were not willing to underwrite that.

By selling the shares of Atwood and reinvesting in Patterson we do give up some revenue backlog, but we pick up another well run dividend paying company at a discount to tangible book value with a much better balance sheet and greater liquidity. Crucially, it costs very little money to store Patterson’s land drilling rigs or pressure pumping equipment in a yard if either are idled. We have confidence that by selling Atwood and investing in Patterson we have reduced our downside risk. Recall that we executed a similar swap in the first quarter of this year, when we replaced our Ensco holding with Helmerich & Payne for the very same reasons: similar upside but significantly greater downside protection.

From FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio)'s third quarter 2015 letter to shareholders.

Check out FPA Capital Fund latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Atwood Oceanics Inc

Par Pacific Holdings and Photronics Set to Join S&P SmallCap 600
Seadrill Bankruptcy: Race to the Bottom Restructurings are only piling more pain on day rates
Seadrill (NYSE:SDRL) filed for bankruptcy protection in the Southern District of Texas on Sept. 13 after reaching an agreement with its creditors. This deal, while good for Seadrill employees and managers, is bad news for almost everyone else, and it will likely only extend the offshore drilling industry’s slump. Read more...
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Monteverde & Associates PC Announces An Investigation Of Atwood Oceanics, Inc. - ATW
WeissLaw LLP: The Atwood Oceanics, Inc. Merger May Not Be in the Best Interests of ATW Shareholders
Covered Call reports for Atwood Oceanics, Inc., iRobot, Micron, Palo Alto Networks and Tesla Motors include trade ideas that offer returns of 19% or more!
ATWOOD OCEANICS INVESTOR ALERT BY THE FORMER ATTORNEY GENERAL OF LOUISIANA: Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC Investigates Adequacy of Price and Process in Proposed Sale of Atwood Oceanics, Inc.
Harwood Feffer LLP Announces Investigation of Atwood Oceanics, Inc.
ATWOOD (ATW) ALERT: J&W Investigates Proposed Sale of Atwood Oceanics, Inc.; Are Shareholders Getting a Fair Price?
8 Stocks Van Den Berg Continues to Buy Guru increased these holdings in the last 2 quarters
Arnold Van Den Berg (Trades, Portfolio), a value investor, founded Century Management in 1974. In both first-quarter 2017 and fourth-quarter 2016 the guru bought shares in the following stocks. Read more...
Bruce Berkowitz Comments on Atwood Oceanics Guru stock highlight
Stressed energy markets led us to invest in senior bonds of offshore driller Atwood Oceanics (NYSE:ATW). The bonds were purchased at attractive prices relative to the backlog of future cash flow from drilling operations and the value of Atwood’s modernized fleet. Thus far, Atwood has weathered tough conditions as the industry slowly rebalances between rig supply and demand in a lower commodity price environment. Atwood’s management has reduced cash operating costs by 25% while extending contracts with customers and suppliers. Atwood also reduced the outstanding senior bond class by over 30% through debt repurchases and raised liquidity through an equity offering. All actions combine to give us comfort that Atwood is positioned to capitalize on the eventual upcycle. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PB Ratio 0.22
ATW's PB Ratio is ranked higher than
85% of the 55 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.62 vs. ATW: 0.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
ATW' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.12  Med: 1.54 Max: 5.07
Current: 0.22
0.12
5.07
PS Ratio 1.04
ATW's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
52% of the 56 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 1.04 vs. ATW: 1.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
ATW' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.27  Med: 3.4 Max: 8.06
Current: 1.04
0.27
8.06
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 4.43
ATW's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
58% of the 24 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 5.06 vs. ATW: 4.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
ATW' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.09  Med: 19.35 Max: 445.93
Current: 4.43
1.09
445.93
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 1.84
ATW's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
74% of the 38 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 4.20 vs. ATW: 1.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
ATW' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.58  Med: 7.54 Max: 20.62
Current: 1.84
0.58
20.62
EV-to-EBIT 31.23
ATW's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
62% of the 29 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 16.99 vs. ATW: 31.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
ATW' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3  Med: 9.5 Max: 32.5
Current: 31.23
3
32.5
EV-to-EBITDA 7.25
ATW's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
62% of the 45 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 8.66 vs. ATW: 7.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
ATW' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.4  Med: 7.7 Max: 15.9
Current: 7.25
2.4
15.9
EV-to-Revenue 2.49
ATW's EV-to-Revenue is ranked lower than
56% of the 57 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 2.37 vs. ATW: 2.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
ATW' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.4  Med: 4.1 Max: 8
Current: 2.49
1.4
8
Shiller PE Ratio 2.09
ATW's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
82% of the 17 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 5.38 vs. ATW: 2.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
ATW' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.32  Med: 18.39 Max: 68.83
Current: 2.09
1.32
68.83
Current Ratio 8.79
ATW's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
89% of the 63 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 1.83 vs. ATW: 8.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
ATW' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.61  Med: 2.96 Max: 12.18
Current: 8.79
0.61
12.18
Quick Ratio 7.45
ATW's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
89% of the 63 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 1.53 vs. ATW: 7.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
ATW' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.49  Med: 2.47 Max: 11.23
Current: 7.45
0.49
11.23
Days Inventory 142.49
ATW's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
85% of the 40 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 33.84 vs. ATW: 142.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
ATW' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 47.68  Med: 77.38 Max: 142.49
Current: 142.49
47.68
142.49
Days Sales Outstanding 45.19
ATW's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
75% of the 48 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 66.73 vs. ATW: 45.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
ATW' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 40.44  Med: 72.41 Max: 94.08
Current: 45.19
40.44
94.08
Days Payable 47.46
ATW's Days Payable is ranked lower than
63% of the 40 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 57.72 vs. ATW: 47.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
ATW' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 22.7  Med: 49.79 Max: 184.52
Current: 47.46
22.7
184.52

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 0.74
ATW's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
60% of the 88 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 5.94 vs. ATW: 0.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
ATW' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.73  Med: 3.07 Max: 14.65
Current: 0.74
0.73
14.65
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -0.40
ATW's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
66% of the 50 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -4.60 vs. ATW: -0.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
ATW' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -19.9  Med: -0.6 Max: 0.4
Current: -0.4
-19.9
0.4

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 0.22
ATW's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked higher than
87% of the 54 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. ATW: 0.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
ATW' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.17  Med: 1.51 Max: 6.22
Current: 0.22
0.17
6.22
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 0.46
ATW's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
67% of the 30 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.77 vs. ATW: 0.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
ATW' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.4  Med: 4.38 Max: 71.4
Current: 0.46
0.4
71.4
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.31
ATW's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
81% of the 53 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.76 vs. ATW: 0.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
ATW' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.13  Med: 0.88 Max: 2.52
Current: 0.31
0.13
2.52
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 3.20
ATW's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
72% of the 65 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -1.61 vs. ATW: 3.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
ATW' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.1  Med: 10.5 Max: 33.4
Current: 3.2
3.1
33.4
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -15.44
ATW's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
63% of the 32 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -8.48 vs. ATW: -15.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
ATW' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -51.3  Med: 10.1 Max: 50
Current: -15.44
-51.3
50

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $631.17
EPS (TTM) $ -0.21
Short Percentage of Float97.14%
52-Week Range $5.91 - 15.37
Shares Outstanding (Mil)80.46

Analyst Estimate

Sep17 Sep18 Sep19
Revenue (Mil $)
EPS ($) -2.58 -2.70 -2.38
EPS without NRI ($) -2.58 -2.70 -2.38
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($)

Piotroski F-Score Details

Piotroski F-Score: 44
Positive ROAN
Positive CFROAY
Higher ROA yoyN
CFROA > ROAY
Lower Leverage yoyY
Higher Current Ratio yoyY
Less Shares Outstanding yoyN
Higher Gross Margin yoyN
Higher Asset Turnover yoyN

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}