Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany, Mexico

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 1.30
FLR's Cash-to-Debt is ranked higher than
57% of the 1044 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.92 vs. FLR: 1.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
FLR' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.48  Med: 4.24 Max: N/A
Current: 1.3
Equity-to-Asset 0.35
FLR's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
61% of the 1011 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.42 vs. FLR: 0.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
FLR' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.26  Med: 0.38 Max: 0.49
Current: 0.35
0.26
0.49
Interest Coverage 6.93
FLR's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
67% of the 890 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 19.80 vs. FLR: 6.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
FLR' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.6  Med: 42.62 Max: 113.07
Current: 6.93
8.6
113.07
Piotroski F-Score: 5
Altman Z-Score: 3.75
Beneish M-Score: -2.40
WACC vs ROIC
9.13%
7.52%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 2.59
FLR's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
71% of the 1031 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 5.27 vs. FLR: 2.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
FLR' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.63  Med: 4.28 Max: 5.65
Current: 2.59
2.63
5.65
Net Margin % 1.22
FLR's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
73% of the 1034 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.50 vs. FLR: 1.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
FLR' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.48  Med: 2.41 Max: 3.23
Current: 1.22
1.48
3.23
ROE % 7.58
FLR's ROE % is ranked lower than
53% of the 1022 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 8.19 vs. FLR: 7.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
FLR' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.19  Med: 16.06 Max: 29.14
Current: 7.58
9.19
29.14
ROA % 2.59
FLR's ROA % is ranked lower than
55% of the 1047 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.07 vs. FLR: 2.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
FLR' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.34  Med: 6.84 Max: 11.79
Current: 2.59
3.34
11.79
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 46.25
FLR's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
77% of the 1041 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 18.24 vs. FLR: 46.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
FLR' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 58.54  Med: 90.83 Max: 142.19
Current: 46.25
58.54
142.19
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -6.70
FLR's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
72% of the 878 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.50 vs. FLR: -6.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
FLR' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9  Med: 4.35 Max: 17.4
Current: -6.7
-9
17.4
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -11.40
FLR's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
79% of the 746 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 6.30 vs. FLR: -11.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
FLR' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 1.75 Max: 42.6
Current: -11.4
0
42.6
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -21.00
FLR's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
82% of the 681 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 6.40 vs. FLR: -21.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
FLR' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -37.8  Med: 9.7 Max: 62.1
Current: -21
-37.8
62.1
GuruFocus has detected 1 Warning Sign with Fluor Corp $FLR.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» FLR's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-08-03)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2016

FLR Guru Trades in Q3 2016

John Rogers 269,566 sh (New)
Ray Dalio 43,866 sh (New)
Pioneer Investments 675,116 sh (+44.35%)
David Dreman 5,289 sh (unchged)
Dodge & Cox 7,195 sh (unchged)
Caxton Associates Sold Out
John Buckingham 70,676 sh (-0.72%)
Ken Fisher 13,905 sh (-13.36%)
Alan Fournier 126,100 sh (-30.25%)
Jim Simons 247,400 sh (-39.03%)
Joel Greenblatt 63,735 sh (-73.68%)
» More
Q4 2016

FLR Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Jeremy Grantham 7,400 sh (New)
Paul Singer 37,100 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 8,700 sh (New)
John Rogers 436,266 sh (+61.84%)
Pioneer Investments 769,262 sh (+13.95%)
John Buckingham 75,418 sh (+6.71%)
Ken Fisher 14,055 sh (+1.08%)
Dodge & Cox 7,195 sh (unchged)
Alan Fournier Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
David Dreman 222 sh (-95.80%)
» More
Q1 2017

FLR Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Joel Greenblatt 376,717 sh (New)
Ray Dalio 91,450 sh (New)
John Buckingham 80,370 sh (+6.57%)
Paul Tudor Jones 8,900 sh (+2.30%)
John Rogers 436,266 sh (unchged)
David Dreman Sold Out
Paul Singer Sold Out
Jeremy Grantham Sold Out
Pioneer Investments 767,548 sh (-0.22%)
Ken Fisher 13,572 sh (-3.44%)
Dodge & Cox 6,205 sh (-13.76%)
» More
Q2 2017

FLR Guru Trades in Q2 2017

Ken Fisher 14,169 sh (+4.40%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with FLR

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Engineering & Construction » Engineering & Construction    NAICS: 237990    SIC: 1629
Compare:NYSE:JEC, NYSE:ACM, NYSE:PWR, NYSE:EME, NYSE:MTZ, NYSE:DY, NAS:TTEK, NYSE:KBR, NYSE:GVA, NYSE:TPC, NYSE:FIX, NAS:PRIM, NYSE:AGX, NAS:AEGN, NYSE:TRR, NAS:MYRG, NAS:VSEC, NAS:NVEE, NAS:IESC, NAS:STRL » details
Traded in other countries:FLU.Germany, FLR.Mexico,
Headquarter Location:USA
Fluor Corp is an engineering company that provides procurement, construction and maintenance as well as project management services to a range of customers including oil and gas, manufacturing, and mining companies, along with the U.S. federal government.

Fluor is a global provider of engineering, procurement, fabrication, construction, and maintenance services to a wide range of customers, including oil and gas, manufacturing, and mining companies, along with the U.S. government. The majority of its revenue comes from energy, chemical, and mining work. Fluor aims to leverage its wide capabilities and global reach to win larger and more complex projects. The company generated 2016 revenue and adjusted operating income of $19.0 billion and $599 million, respectively, and employs 59,000 people.

Top Ranked Articles about Fluor Corp

Great Lakes Announces Changes to Board of Directors

OAK BROOK, Ill., Jan. 26, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (the “Company” or “Great Lakes”) (NASDAQ:GLDD), the largest provider of dredging services in the United States and a major provider of environmental and remediation services, today announced that Lawrence R. Dickerson and D. Michael Steuert have been appointed to the Board of Director’s 2019 director class, effective January 24, 2017. Mr. Dickerson has been appointed to the Compensation Committee, and Mr. Steuert has been appointed to the Audit Committee.  With the addition of Messrs. Dickerson and Steuert, the Board will expand to nine members.  The Board is expected to be reduced to eight members as of the 2017 Annual Meeting. 
The Company also announced today that current Board Member Peter Deutsch has elected to withdraw his name from consideration for the 2017 slate of nominees.  Mr. Deutsch is a Member of the Audit Committee and a Member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Dickerson spent 34 years at Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. (NYSE:NYSE:DO), a deepwater oil  and gas drilling contractor, where he served as President and Chief Executive Officer from 2008 until his retirement in 2014.  Prior to his service as President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Dickerson served as Chief Financial Officer (CFO), during which he helped take the company public, and Chief Operating Officer, during which he gained substantial operating and commercial experience.  In addition to being a seasoned executive, Mr. Dickerson has significant board experience.  He has been a Member of the Board of Directors on the boards of Murphy Oil Corporation (MUR), a gas exploration and production company, and Oil States International (NYSE:NYSE:OIS), an oilfield equipment services company, since 2014.  Mr. Dickerson is on the Audit and Nominating and Governance Committees at Murphy Oil Corporation and on the Audit Committee at Oil States International.  He was Chairman of the Board of Directors at Hercules Offshore, Inc. from 2015 to 2016, an offshore drilling company, and he was a director of on the Board of Directors Global Industries, Ltd. from 2008 - 2012, a subsea construction company that was sold to Technip in 2011.  Mr. Steuert served as senior vice president (SVP) and CFO of Fluor Corporation (NYSE:NYSE:FLR), one of the world’s largest publicly traded engineering, procurement, construction, maintenance, and project management companies, from 2001 until his retirement in 2012.  Prior to his service at Fluor, Mr. Steuert served as SVP and CFO of Litton Industries Inc., a defense contractor acquired by Northrop Grumman Corporation in 2001, and as SVP and CFO of GenCorp Inc., now Aerojet Rocketdyne, a technology-based aerospace and defense company, from 1990 to 1999.  Mr. Steuert started his career at TRW Inc. In addition to his extensive executive leadership experience, Mr. Steuert has substantial board experience.  He has been a Member of the Board of Directors of LNG Ltd. (ASX:LNG) since 2015 and is a member of the Board’s Audit Committee and Chairman of its Risk Committee.  He has been a Member of the Board of Directors of Weyerhaeuser Co. (NYSE:NYSE:WY) since 2004 and is Chairman and Financial expert of the Audit Committee and is a member of the Corporate Responsibility and Governance Committee. Robert B. Uhler, P.E., Chairman of the Board, commented, “Larry and Mike bring a wealth of relevant valuable experience to the GLDD Board.  I am confident each will contribute to the GLDD Board and to management’s goal of delivering long-term shareholder value for the Company.  On behalf of the Board, I welcome both of them and look forward to working with them.” Mr. Uhler continued, “These appointments follow our previous announcements that Lasse Petterson and Ryan Levenson joined the Great Lakes Board in late December. The addition of these new directors reflects our commitment to Board refreshment and further strengthens our Board of Directors.  Finally, on behalf of the Board, I’d like to extend our sincere gratitude to Mr. Deutsch for his service and commitment to the Board over the past several years.” The Company Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (“Great Lakes” or the “Company”) is the largest provider of dredging services in the United States and the only U.S. dredging company with significant international operations. The Company is also a significant provider of environmental and remediation services on land and water.  The Company employs civil, ocean and mechanical engineering staff in its estimating, production and project management functions.  In its over 126-year history, the Company has never failed to complete a marine project. Great Lakes has a disciplined training program for engineers that ensures experienced-based performance as they advance through Company operations. Great Lakes also owns and operates the largest and most diverse fleet in the U.S. dredging industry, comprised of over 200 specialized vessels. Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this press release may constitute "forward-looking" statements as defined in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "PSLRA") or in releases made by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), all as may be amended from time to time. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Great Lakes and its subsidiaries, or industry results, to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Statements that are not historical fact are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be identified by, among other things, the use of forward-looking language, such as the words "plan," "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "estimate," "project," "may," "would," "could," "should," "seeks," or "scheduled to," or other similar words, or the negative of these terms or other variations of these terms or comparable language, or by discussion of strategy or intentions. These cautionary statements are being made pursuant to the Exchange Act and the PSLRA with the intention of obtaining the benefits of the "safe harbor" provisions of such laws. Great Lakes cautions investors that any forward-looking statements made by Great Lakes are not guarantees or indicative of future performance. Important assumptions and other important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those forward-looking statements with respect to Great Lakes, include, but are not limited to: our ability to obtain federal government dredging and other contracts; our ability to qualify as an eligible bidder under government contract criteria and to compete successfully against other qualified bidders; risks associated with cost over-runs, operating cost inflation and potential claims for liquidated damages, particularly with respect to our fixed cost contracts; the timing of our performance on contracts; significant liabilities that could be imposed were we to fail to comply with government contracting regulations; risks related to international dredging operations, including instability in the Middle East; a significant negative change to large, single customer contracts from which a significant portion of our international revenue is derived; changes in previously-recorded revenue and profit due to our use of the percentage-of-completion method of accounting; consequences of any lapse in disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting; changes in the amount of our estimated backlog; our ability to obtain bonding or letters of credit; increasing costs to operate and maintain aging vessels; equipment or mechanical failures; acquisition integration and consolidation risks; liabilities related to our historical demolition business; impacts of legal and regulatory proceedings; unforeseen delays and cost overruns related to the construction of new vessels; our becoming liable for the obligations of joint ventures, partners and subcontractors; capital and operational costs due to environmental regulations; unionized labor force work stoppages; maintaining an adequate level of insurance coverage; information technology security breaches; our substantial amount of indebtedness; restrictions imposed by financing covenants; the impact of adverse capital and credit market conditions; limitations on our hedging strategy imposed by new statutory and regulatory requirements for derivative transactions; foreign exchange risks; changes in macroeconomic indicators and the overall business climate; and losses attributable to our investments in privately financed projects. For additional information on these and other risks and uncertainties, please see Item 1A. "Risk Factors" of Great Lakes' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, and in other securities filings by Great Lakes with the SEC. Although Great Lakes believes that its plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by such forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results could differ materially from a projection or assumption in any forward-looking statements. Great Lakes' future financial condition and results of operations, as well as any forward-looking statements, are subject to change and inherent risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements contained in this press release are made only as of the date hereof and Great Lakes does not have or undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, subsequent events or otherwise, unless otherwise required by law. Source: Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation GLDD CORP
For further information contact:
Mary Morrissey, Investor Relations
630-574-3467

Read more...
John Rogers Boosts Berkshire, Rockwell Collins, Tiffany The founder of Ariel Investment's largest buys of the 3rd quarterom Ru
John Rogers (Trades, Portfolio) founded Ariel Investment LLC in 1983, and the firm now has a total value of $8.267 billion. During the third quarter the guru’s largest buys were the following: Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 26.79
FLR's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
73% of the 824 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 15.75 vs. FLR: 26.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
FLR' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.37  Med: 20.88 Max: 47.26
Current: 26.79
7.37
47.26
Forward PE Ratio 17.18
FLR's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
53% of the 98 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 16.00 vs. FLR: 17.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 26.79
FLR's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
73% of the 824 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 15.92 vs. FLR: 26.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
FLR' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.37  Med: 19.55 Max: 46.85
Current: 26.79
7.37
46.85
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 11.04
FLR's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked higher than
60% of the 485 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 14.35 vs. FLR: 11.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
FLR' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.11  Med: 19.35 Max: 113.03
Current: 11.04
5.11
113.03
PB Ratio 1.93
FLR's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
68% of the 1001 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.34 vs. FLR: 1.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
FLR' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.9  Med: 2.85 Max: 7.28
Current: 1.93
1.9
7.28
PS Ratio 0.33
FLR's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
78% of the 1010 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.68 vs. FLR: 0.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
FLR' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.25  Med: 0.42 Max: 0.98
Current: 0.33
0.25
0.98
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 10.43
FLR's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
55% of the 334 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 12.78 vs. FLR: 10.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
FLR' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.39  Med: 20.69 Max: 338
Current: 10.43
7.39
338
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 7.37
FLR's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
58% of the 429 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 9.17 vs. FLR: 7.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
FLR' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.38  Med: 13.28 Max: 30.06
Current: 7.37
5.38
30.06
EV-to-EBIT 11.34
FLR's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
51% of the 860 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 11.74 vs. FLR: 11.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
FLR' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.2  Med: 9.4 Max: 24.5
Current: 11.34
3.2
24.5
EV-to-EBITDA 7.84
FLR's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
60% of the 890 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 9.58 vs. FLR: 7.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
FLR' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.8  Med: 7.9 Max: 19.5
Current: 7.84
2.8
19.5
Shiller PE Ratio 13.48
FLR's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
65% of the 202 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 19.33 vs. FLR: 13.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
FLR' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.73  Med: 21.63 Max: 37.76
Current: 13.48
12.73
37.76
Current Ratio 1.51
FLR's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
52% of the 1019 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.48 vs. FLR: 1.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
FLR' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.88  Med: 1.51 Max: 1.91
Current: 1.51
0.88
1.91
Quick Ratio 1.12
FLR's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
61% of the 1019 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.29 vs. FLR: 1.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
FLR' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.76  Med: 1.07 Max: 1.63
Current: 1.12
0.76
1.63
Days Inventory 31.15
FLR's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
55% of the 852 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 25.05 vs. FLR: 31.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
FLR' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 16.93  Med: 26.33 Max: 31.78
Current: 31.15
16.93
31.78
Days Sales Outstanding 29.90
FLR's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
83% of the 771 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 72.06 vs. FLR: 29.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
FLR' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 16.42  Med: 20.38 Max: 32.6
Current: 29.9
16.42
32.6
Days Payable 31.98
FLR's Days Payable is ranked lower than
77% of the 675 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 75.31 vs. FLR: 31.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
FLR' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 20.13  Med: 25.87 Max: 31.98
Current: 31.98
20.13
31.98

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 1.88
FLR's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
60% of the 1142 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.39 vs. FLR: 1.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
FLR' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.44  Med: 1.02 Max: 2
Current: 1.88
0.44
2
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.50
FLR's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked lower than
75% of the 639 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.28 vs. FLR: 0.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
FLR' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.13  Med: 0.17 Max: 0.5
Current: 0.5
0.13
0.5
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 9.50
FLR's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked higher than
55% of the 503 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 6.60 vs. FLR: 9.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
FLR' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 7.7 Max: 18.9
Current: 9.5
0
18.9
Forward Dividend Yield % 1.86
FLR's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
64% of the 1070 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.59 vs. FLR: 1.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 3.18
FLR's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked higher than
56% of the 1422 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.97 vs. FLR: 3.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
FLR' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.74  Med: 1.73 Max: 3.39
Current: 3.18
0.74
3.39
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 4.80
FLR's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
97% of the 534 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: -2.60 vs. FLR: 4.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
FLR' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.8  Med: -0.1 Max: 5
Current: 4.8
-2.8
5

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 2.35
FLR's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
69% of the 914 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.47 vs. FLR: 2.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
FLR' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.97  Med: 3.3 Max: 7.08
Current: 2.35
1.97
7.08
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 0.92
FLR's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
64% of the 504 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.20 vs. FLR: 0.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
FLR' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.84  Med: 1.36 Max: 5.49
Current: 0.92
0.84
5.49
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.78
FLR's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
83% of the 941 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.15 vs. FLR: 0.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
FLR' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.46  Med: 0.99 Max: 4.03
Current: 0.78
0.46
4.03
Price-to-Graham-Number 1.67
FLR's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked lower than
70% of the 708 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.02 vs. FLR: 1.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
FLR' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.89  Med: 1.69 Max: 3.23
Current: 1.67
0.89
3.23
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 8.81
FLR's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
60% of the 1045 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 6.71 vs. FLR: 8.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
FLR' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.1  Med: 10.6 Max: 31.5
Current: 8.81
4.1
31.5
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 3.18
FLR's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
60% of the 522 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 7.23 vs. FLR: 3.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
FLR' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.6  Med: 13.3 Max: 38.2
Current: 3.18
1.6
38.2

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $19,448.54
EPS (TTM) $ 1.68
Beta1.34
Short Percentage of Float4.72%
52-Week Range $43.65 - 58.37
Shares Outstanding (Mil)162.36

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 20,089 20,991 21,019
EPS ($) 2.65 3.10 3.35
EPS without NRI ($) 2.65 3.10 3.35
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
16.94%
Dividends per Share ($) 0.82 0.84 0.85
» More Articles for FLR

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Great Lakes Announces Changes to Board of Directors Jan 26 2017 
John Rogers Boosts Berkshire, Rockwell Collins, Tiffany Dec 14 2016 
Stocks to Buy and Sell If Bernie Sanders Is Elected Apr 14 2016 
CF Industries Among Stocks Trading Below Peter Lynch Value Feb 11 2016 
The Best Companies of the Construction Industry – October 2015 Oct 08 2015 
Gulf Coast LNG Projects Dominate 2016's Top 10 Spending Projects in U.S. Southwest Region, an Indust Aug 14 2015 
Weekly 3-Year Low Highlights: NBL, WFM, FLR, LPL Aug 04 2015 
Should you follow these analysts and buy Chicago Bridge and Iron Mar 18 2015 
Engineering Firm Fluor Should Prioritize Margins Dec 19 2014 
After Recent Price Drop, Fluor (FLR) Looks Mighty Attractive Dec 02 2014 

More From Other Websites
Fluor Corp. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : FLR-US : July 21, 2017 Jul 21 2017
Fluor Selects Bruce Stanski as New Chief Financial Officer Jul 18 2017
ETFs with exposure to Fluor Corp. : July 14, 2017 Jul 14 2017
Fluor Corporation to Hold Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call Jul 06 2017
Corporate News Blog - Fluor Corp. Signs MoU with Saudi Arabian Mining Firm, Ma'aden Jun 30 2017
Fluor Signs Memorandum of Understanding with Saudi Arabian Mining Company Ma’aden Jun 28 2017
ETFs with exposure to Fluor Corp. : June 27, 2017 Jun 27 2017
The 3 Top Stocks for Your IRA in June Jun 26 2017
Fluor Secures Five Year Maintenance and Operations Support Contract with GLOBALFOUNDRIES Jun 12 2017
Why Is Fluor (FLR) Down 8.7% Since the Last Earnings Report? Jun 09 2017
Fluor Corp. :FLR-US: Earnings Analysis: Q1, 2017 By the Numbers : June 8, 2017 Jun 08 2017
Infrastructure stocks aren't buying Trump's infrastructure talk Jun 08 2017
There Is Now Opportunity In Fluor; DA Davidson Upgrades To Buy Jun 01 2017
Fluor JV Clinches Contract from U.S. Department of Energy May 31 2017
U.S. Department of Energy Selects Fluor Joint Venture for Paducah Site Deactivation Contract May 30 2017
Report: Bechtel, Fluor will bid to take over construction of Vogtle nuclear project May 27 2017
CH2M-led Four Rivers Nuclear Partnership, LLC. awarded Department of Energy Paducah Deactivation and... May 26 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}