GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Technology » Software » Formula Systems (1985) Ltd (NAS:FORTY) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

Formula Systems (1985) (Formula Systems (1985)) Piotroski F-Score

: 5 (As of Today)
View and export this data going back to 1997. Start your Free Trial

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Formula Systems (1985) has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Formula Systems (1985)'s Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

FORTY' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 4   Max: 7
Current: 5

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Formula Systems (1985) was 7. The lowest was 2. And the median was 4.


Formula Systems (1985) Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Formula Systems (1985)'s Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Formula Systems (1985) Annual Data
Trend Dec13 Dec14 Dec15 Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22
Piotroski F-Score
Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 6.00 7.00 7.00 6.00 5.00

Formula Systems (1985) Quarterly Data
Dec18 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Mar20 Jun20 Sep20 Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23
Piotroski F-Score Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only - 5.00 - - -

Competitive Comparison

For the Information Technology Services subindustry, Formula Systems (1985)'s Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Formula Systems (1985) Piotroski F-Score Distribution

For the Software industry and Technology sector, Formula Systems (1985)'s Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Formula Systems (1985)'s Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec22) TTM:Last Year (Dec21) TTM:
Net Income was $81 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was $239 Mil.
Revenue was $2,572 Mil.
Gross Profit was $622 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec21)
to the end of this year (Dec22) was (2748.566 + 2793.955) / 2 = $2771.2605 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec21) was $2,749 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $500 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $1,371 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $1,001 Mil.
Net Income was $55 Mil.

Revenue was $2,404 Mil.
Gross Profit was $564 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec20)
to the end of last year (Dec21) was (2520.08 + 2748.566) / 2 = $2634.323 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec20) was $2,520 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $447 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $1,302 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $948 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Formula Systems (1985)'s current Net Income (TTM) was 81. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Formula Systems (1985)'s current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 239. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec21)
=81.393/2748.566
=0.0296129

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec20)
=54.585/2520.08
=0.02166003

Formula Systems (1985)'s return on assets of this year was 0.0296129. Formula Systems (1985)'s return on assets of last year was 0.02166003. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Formula Systems (1985)'s current Net Income (TTM) was 81. Formula Systems (1985)'s current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 239. ==> 239 > 81 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Dec22)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec21 to Dec22
=500.472/2771.2605
=0.18059363

Gearing (Last Year: Dec21)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec20 to Dec21
=447.103/2634.323
=0.16972216

Formula Systems (1985)'s gearing of this year was 0.18059363. Formula Systems (1985)'s gearing of last year was 0.16972216. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Dec22)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=1371.499/1000.987
=1.37014667

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec21)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=1302.117/947.596
=1.37412674

Formula Systems (1985)'s current ratio of this year was 1.37014667. Formula Systems (1985)'s current ratio of last year was 1.37412674. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Formula Systems (1985)'s number of shares in issue this year was 15.503. Formula Systems (1985)'s number of shares in issue last year was 15.404. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=622.465/2572.357
=0.24198235

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=563.859/2404.376
=0.23451365

Formula Systems (1985)'s gross margin of this year was 0.24198235. Formula Systems (1985)'s gross margin of last year was 0.23451365. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec21)
=2572.357/2748.566
=0.93589057

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec20)
=2404.376/2520.08
=0.95408717

Formula Systems (1985)'s asset turnover of this year was 0.93589057. Formula Systems (1985)'s asset turnover of last year was 0.95408717. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+1+0+0+0+1+0
=5

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Formula Systems (1985) has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Formula Systems (1985)  (NAS:FORTY) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Formula Systems (1985) Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Formula Systems (1985)'s Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Formula Systems (1985) (Formula Systems (1985)) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
Address
Yahadut Canada 1 Street, Or Yehuda, Tel Aviv, ISR, 6037501
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd is a holding company that, through its subsidiaries, provides information technology services. The company organizes itself into three primary segments based on the subsidiary. The Matrix segment, which generates the majority of revenue, provides software development and existing software expansion services. The Sapiens segment provides software development services for the insurance industry. The Magic Software segment provides vendor management systems and workforce management services, which include accounting and finance, human resources, IT technology, and marketing and sales. Michpal; ZAP Group and Others. The majority of the company's revenue comes from Israel.