GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Basic Materials » Metals & Mining » Polyus PJSC (OTCPK:OPYGY) » Definitions » Beneish M-Score
中文

Polyus PJSC (Polyus PJSC) Beneish M-Score : -1.24 (As of Apr. 24, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 2006. Start your Free Trial

Polyus PJSC Beneish M-Score Definition

The zones of discrimination for M-Score is as such:

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.
An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Warning Sign:

Beneish M-Score -1.24 higher than -1.78, which implies that the company might have manipulated its financial results.

The historical rank and industry rank for Polyus PJSC's Beneish M-Score or its related term are showing as below:

OPYGY' s Beneish M-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.39   Med: -2.19   Max: -1.24
Current: -1.24

During the past 10 years, the highest Beneish M-Score of Polyus PJSC was -1.24. The lowest was -3.39. And the median was -2.19.


Polyus PJSC Beneish M-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Polyus PJSC's Beneish M-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Polyus PJSC Beneish M-Score Chart

Polyus PJSC Annual Data
Trend Dec14 Dec15 Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23
Beneish M-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -1.83 -3.30 -3.39 -2.48 -1.24

Polyus PJSC Semi-Annual Data
Dec14 Jun15 Dec15 Jun16 Dec16 Jun17 Dec17 Jun18 Dec18 Jun19 Dec19 Jun20 Dec20 Jun21 Dec21 Jun22 Dec22 Jun23 Dec23
Beneish M-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -3.39 -1.71 -2.48 4.95 -1.24

Competitive Comparison of Polyus PJSC's Beneish M-Score

For the Gold subindustry, Polyus PJSC's Beneish M-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Beneish M-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Polyus PJSC Beneish M-Score Distribution

For the Metals & Mining industry and Basic Materials sector, Polyus PJSC's Beneish M-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Polyus PJSC's Beneish M-Score falls into.



Polyus PJSC Beneish M-Score Calculation

The M-score was created by Professor Messod Beneish. Instead of measuring the bankruptcy risk (Altman Z-Score) or business trend (Piotroski F-Score), M-score can be used to detect the risk of earnings manipulation. This is the original research paper on M-score.

The M-Score Variables:

The M-score of Polyus PJSC for today is based on a combination of the following eight different indices:

M=-4.84+0.92 * DSRI+0.528 * GMI+0.404 * AQI+0.892 * SGI+0.115 * DEPI
=-4.84+0.92 * 2.86+0.528 * 0.8225+0.404 * 0.9488+0.892 * 1.277+0.115 * 0.8028
-0.172 * SGAI+4.679 * TATA-0.327 * LVGI
-0.172 * 1.1594+4.679 * -0.1257-0.327 * 2.5433
=-1.78

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec23) TTM:Last Year (Dec22) TTM:
Total Receivables was $168 Mil.
Revenue was $5,436 Mil.
Gross Profit was $3,720 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $3,083 Mil.
Total Assets was $9,284 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was $4,899 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was $484 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was $114 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $1,494 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $8,004 Mil.
Net Income was $1,729 Mil.
Gross Profit was $0 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was $2,896 Mil.
Total Receivables was $46 Mil.
Revenue was $4,257 Mil.
Gross Profit was $2,396 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $2,699 Mil.
Total Assets was $9,939 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was $5,771 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was $449 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was $77 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $825 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $3,173 Mil.




1. DSRI = Days Sales in Receivables Index

Measured as the ratio of Revenue in Total Receivables in year t to year t-1.

A large increase in DSR could be indicative of revenue inflation.

DSRI=(Receivables_t / Revenue_t) / (Receivables_t-1 / Revenue_t-1)
=(168 / 5436) / (46 / 4257)
=0.030905 / 0.010806
=2.86

2. GMI = Gross Margin Index

Measured as the ratio of gross margin in year t-1 to gross margin in year t.

Gross margin has deteriorated when this index is above 1. A firm with poorer prospects is more likely to manipulate earnings.

GMI=GrossMargin_t-1 / GrossMargin_t
=(GrossProfit_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) / (GrossProfit_t / Revenue_t)
=(2396 / 4257) / (3720 / 5436)
=0.562838 / 0.684327
=0.8225

3. AQI = Asset Quality Index

AQI is the ratio of asset quality in year t to year t-1.

Asset quality is measured as the ratio of non-current assets other than Property, Plant and Equipment to Total Assets.

AQI=(1 - (CurrentAssets_t + PPE_t) / TotalAssets_t) / (1 - (CurrentAssets_t-1 + PPE_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=(1 - (3083 + 4899) / 9284) / (1 - (2699 + 5771) / 9939)
=0.140241 / 0.147802
=0.9488

4. SGI = Sales Growth Index

Ratio of Revenue in year t to sales in year t-1.

Sales growth is not itself a measure of manipulation. However, growth companies are likely to find themselves under pressure to manipulate in order to keep up appearances.

SGI=Sales_t / Sales_t-1
=Revenue_t / Revenue_t-1
=5436 / 4257
=1.277

5. DEPI = Depreciation Index

Measured as the ratio of the rate of Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization in year t-1 to the corresponding rate in year t.

DEPI greater than 1 indicates that assets are being depreciated at a slower rate. This suggests that the firm might be revising useful asset life assumptions upwards, or adopting a new method that is income friendly.

DEPI=(Depreciation_t-1 / (Depreciaton_t-1 + PPE_t-1)) / (Depreciation_t / (Depreciaton_t + PPE_t))
=(449 / (449 + 5771)) / (484 / (484 + 4899))
=0.072186 / 0.089913
=0.8028

Note: If the Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization data is not available, we assume that the depreciation rate is constant and set the Depreciation Index to 1.

6. SGAI = Sales, General and Administrative expenses Index

The ratio of Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) to Sales in year t relative to year t-1.

SGA expenses index > 1 means that the company is becoming less efficient in generate sales.

SGAI=(SGA_t / Sales_t) / (SGA_t-1 /Sales_t-1)
=(114 / 5436) / (77 / 4257)
=0.020971 / 0.018088
=1.1594

7. LVGI = Leverage Index

The ratio of total debt to Total Assets in year t relative to yeat t-1.

An LVGI > 1 indicates an increase in leverage

LVGI=((LTD_t + CurrentLiabilities_t) / TotalAssets_t) / ((LTD_t-1 + CurrentLiabilities_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=((8004 + 1494) / 9284) / ((3173 + 825) / 9939)
=1.02305 / 0.402254
=2.5433

8. TATA = Total Accruals to Total Assets

Total accruals calculated as the change in working capital accounts other than cash less depreciation.

TATA=(IncomefromContinuingOperations_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(NetIncome_t - NonOperatingIncome_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(1729 - 0 - 2896) / 9284
=-0.1257

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator. An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Polyus PJSC has a M-score of -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.


Polyus PJSC Beneish M-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Polyus PJSC's Beneish M-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Polyus PJSC (Polyus PJSC) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
Address
Krasina Street, 3 Building 1, Cab 801, Moscow, RUS, 123056
Polyus PJSC and its subsidiaries are engaged in the extraction, refining, and sale of gold. The mining and processing facilities of the company are in the Krasnoyarsk, Irkutsk, Magadan regions, and the Sakha Republic of the Russian Federation. The company is also engaged in the exploration, construction, and research activities to maintain its operations. The operating business segments are the Olimpiada business unit, the Blagodatnoye business unit, the Natalka business unit, the Verninskoye business unit, the Kuranakh business unit, Alluvials business unit, Exploration business unit, Sukhoi Log business unit, and Unallocated.

Polyus PJSC (Polyus PJSC) Headlines

From GuruFocus

118 Metals and Mining Companies at 52-Week Low

By Sally Jones Sally Jones 04-22-2013

Be Prepared for the Next Rally in Gold and Silver with These 3 Miners

By Alberto Abaterusso Alberto Abaterusso 11-24-2020

These Asset Classes Could Reinforce Your Portfolio

By Alberto Abaterusso Alberto Abaterusso 04-26-2020

Consider Polyus in a Low-Gold Price Environment

By Alberto Abaterusso Alberto Abaterusso 11-13-2018

Polyus Records 50% Growth in Net Profit

By Alberto Abaterusso Alberto Abaterusso 08-06-2019

Why Polyus PJSC Can Outperform

By Alberto Abaterusso Alberto Abaterusso 02-12-2020

Polyus Jumps on 3rd-Quarter Production

By Alberto Abaterusso Alberto Abaterusso 10-16-2018

Polyus Posts 1st-Quarter Numbers

By Alberto Abaterusso Alberto Abaterusso 05-14-2019

Polyus Increases Gold Production Guidance

By Alberto Abaterusso Alberto Abaterusso 02-11-2019