GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Consumer Cyclical » Travel & Leisure » ILG Inc (NAS:ILG) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

ILG (ILG) Piotroski F-Score : 0 (As of Apr. 29, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 2008. Start your Free Trial

What is ILG Piotroski F-Score?

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

ILG has an F-score of 8. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

The historical rank and industry rank for ILG's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:


ILG Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for ILG's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

ILG Piotroski F-Score Chart

ILG Annual Data
Trend Dec08 Dec09 Dec10 Dec11 Dec12 Dec13 Dec14 Dec15 Dec16 Dec17
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 6.00 4.00 4.00 4.00

ILG Quarterly Data
Sep13 Dec13 Mar14 Jun14 Sep14 Dec14 Mar15 Jun15 Sep15 Dec15 Mar16 Jun16 Sep16 Dec16 Mar17 Jun17 Sep17 Dec17 Mar18 Jun18
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 8.00

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Jun18) TTM:Last Year (Jun17) TTM:
Net Income was 29 + 67 + 43 + 27 = $166 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 76 + -79 + 152 + 32 = $181 Mil.
Revenue was 446 + 438 + 482 + 461 = $1,827 Mil.
Gross Profit was 209 + 203 + 223 + 219 = $854 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Jun17)
to the end of this year (Jun18) was
(3438 + 3579 + 3671 + 3770 + 3661) / 5 = $3623.8 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Jun17) was $3,438 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $914 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $1,193 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $671 Mil.
Net Income was 32 + 27 + 44 + 26 = $129 Mil.

Revenue was 418 + 455 + 444 + 441 = $1,758 Mil.
Gross Profit was 189 + 211 + 207 + 199 = $806 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Jun16)
to the end of last year (Jun17) was
(3133 + 3232 + 3304 + 3404 + 3438) / 5 = $3302.2 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Jun16) was $3,133 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $915 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $871 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $552 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

ILG's current Net Income (TTM) was 166. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

ILG's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 181. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun17)
=166/3438
=0.04828389

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun16)
=129/3133
=0.04117459

ILG's return on assets of this year was 0.04828389. ILG's return on assets of last year was 0.04117459. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

ILG's current Net Income (TTM) was 166. ILG's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 181. ==> 181 > 166 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Jun18)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun17 to Jun18
=914/3623.8
=0.25222143

Gearing (Last Year: Jun17)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun16 to Jun17
=915/3302.2
=0.277088

ILG's gearing of this year was 0.25222143. ILG's gearing of last year was 0.277088. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Jun18)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=1193/671
=1.77794337

Current Ratio (Last Year: Jun17)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=871/552
=1.57789855

ILG's current ratio of this year was 1.77794337. ILG's current ratio of last year was 1.57789855. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

ILG's number of shares in issue this year was 125.874. ILG's number of shares in issue last year was 126.141. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=854/1827
=0.46743295

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=806/1758
=0.45847554

ILG's gross margin of this year was 0.46743295. ILG's gross margin of last year was 0.45847554. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Jun17)
=1827/3438
=0.53141361

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Jun16)
=1758/3133
=0.56112352

ILG's asset turnover of this year was 0.53141361. ILG's asset turnover of last year was 0.56112352. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+0
=8

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

ILG has an F-score of 8. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

ILG  (NAS:ILG) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


ILG Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of ILG's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


ILG (ILG) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
Interval Leisure Group operates the second- largest time-share exchange business, Interval International, which has more than 1.8 million members and approximately 2,600 time-share resorts in more than 75 countries. Large time-share developers and operators that participate in its network include Four Seasons, Westin, Sheraton, Marriott, Hyatt, and Starwood. The firm also operates a smaller division focused on providing management and rental services to time-share resorts and condominiums.