GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Technology » Software » Epiq Systems Inc (NAS:EPIQ) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

Epiq Systems (Epiq Systems) Piotroski F-Score : 0 (As of May. 12, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 1997. Start your Free Trial

What is Epiq Systems Piotroski F-Score?

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Epiq Systems has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Epiq Systems's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:


Epiq Systems Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Epiq Systems's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Epiq Systems Piotroski F-Score Chart

Epiq Systems Annual Data
Trend Dec06 Dec07 Dec08 Dec09 Dec10 Dec11 Dec12 Dec13 Dec14 Dec15
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 3.00

Epiq Systems Quarterly Data
Sep11 Dec11 Mar12 Jun12 Sep12 Dec12 Mar13 Jun13 Sep13 Dec13 Mar14 Jun14 Sep14 Dec14 Mar15 Jun15 Sep15 Dec15 Mar16 Jun16
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 5.00

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Jun16) TTM:Last Year (Jun15) TTM:
Net Income was -19.18 + 8.75 + -0.065 + -5.58 = $-16.1 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 18.865 + 34.51 + -10.341 + 13.214 = $56.2 Mil.
Revenue was 142.535 + 144.632 + 146.531 + 140.744 = $574.4 Mil.
Gross Profit was 67.403 + 72.138 + 66.47 + 67.278 = $273.3 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Jun15)
to the end of this year (Jun16) was
(854.371 + 826.506 + 823.897 + 829.424 + 822.557) / 5 = $831.351 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Jun15) was $854.4 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.0 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $210.3 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $76.1 Mil.
Net Income was 5.01 + -0.63 + 1.733 + -3.241 = $2.9 Mil.

Revenue was 111.006 + 115.137 + 119.028 + 138.01 = $483.2 Mil.
Gross Profit was 55.986 + 55.653 + 57.495 + 62.819 = $232.0 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Jun14)
to the end of last year (Jun15) was
(723.786 + 715.176 + 727.924 + 731.224 + 854.371) / 5 = $750.4962 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Jun14) was $723.8 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $396.7 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $207.1 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $83.8 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Epiq Systems's current Net Income (TTM) was -16.1. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Epiq Systems's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 56.2. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun15)
=-16.075/854.371
=-0.01881501

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun14)
=2.872/723.786
=0.00396802

Epiq Systems's return on assets of this year was -0.01881501. Epiq Systems's return on assets of last year was 0.00396802. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Epiq Systems's current Net Income (TTM) was -16.1. Epiq Systems's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 56.2. ==> 56.2 > -16.1 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Jun16)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun15 to Jun16
=0/831.351
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Jun15)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun14 to Jun15
=396.685/750.4962
=0.52856364

Epiq Systems's gearing of this year was 0. Epiq Systems's gearing of last year was 0.52856364. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Jun16)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=210.279/76.137
=2.76185035

Current Ratio (Last Year: Jun15)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=207.141/83.847
=2.47046406

Epiq Systems's current ratio of this year was 2.76185035. Epiq Systems's current ratio of last year was 2.47046406. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Epiq Systems's number of shares in issue this year was 37.432. Epiq Systems's number of shares in issue last year was 36.536. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=273.289/574.442
=0.4757469

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=231.953/483.181
=0.48005406

Epiq Systems's gross margin of this year was 0.4757469. Epiq Systems's gross margin of last year was 0.48005406. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Jun15)
=574.442/854.371
=0.67235662

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Jun14)
=483.181/723.786
=0.66757439

Epiq Systems's asset turnover of this year was 0.67235662. Epiq Systems's asset turnover of last year was 0.66757439. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+1+0+1+1+1+0+0+1
=5

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Epiq Systems has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Epiq Systems  (NAS:EPIQ) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Epiq Systems Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Epiq Systems's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Epiq Systems (Epiq Systems) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
Epiq Systems Inc was incorporated in the State of Missouri on July 13, 1988, and on July 15, 1988 acquired all of the assets of an unrelated predecessor corporation. The Company is a provider of integrated technology solutions for the legal profession. The Company's solutions streamline the administration of bankruptcy, litigation, financial transactions and regulatory compliance matters. It offers managed technology solutions for eDiscovery, document review, legal notification, claims administration and controlled disbursement of funds. Its clients include law firms, corporate legal departments, bankruptcy trustees, government agencies, mortgage processors, and financial institutions. The Company's business is organized into two reportable segments: the Technology segment and the Bankruptcy and Settlement Administration segment. The Company's Technology segment provides eDiscovery managed services and technology solutions comprised of consulting, collections and forensics, processing, search and review, production of documents and document review services to companies and the litigation departments of law firms. The Company's eDataMatrix software analyzes filters, deduplicates and produces documents for review. The Company's customers are corporations that use its products and services cooperatively with their legal counsel to manage the eDiscovery process for litigation, investigations, anti-trust filings and regulatory matters. Produced documents are made available mainly through a hosted environment utilizing its proprietary software DocuMatrix and third-party software which allows for efficient attorney review and data requests. Bankruptcy and Settlement Administration segment provides managed services and technology solutions that address the needs of its customers with respect to litigation, claims and project administration, compliance matters, controlled disbursements, corporate restructuring, bankruptcy and class action proceedings. The Company's Bankruptcy and Settlement Administration segment provides managed services and technology solutions that address the needs of its customers with respect to litigation, claims and project administration, compliance matters, controlled disbursements, corporate restructuring, bankruptcy and class action proceedings. The Company's Technology segment, eDiscovery competes with companies such as, Kroll Ontrack, FTI Consulting, Inc., Huron Consulting Group Inc., The Dolan Company, Symantec Corporation, Recommind, Inc., Xerox and Autonomy. The Company's Bankruptcy and Settlement Administration segment, bankruptcy services competes with companies such as, Bankruptcy Management Solutions, Inc., which is a provider in Chapter 7 bankruptcy market. While in Chapter 11 bankruptcy market, the Company competes with Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC and The Garden City Group, Inc. In Chapter 13 market, the Company's main competitor is Bankruptcy Software Specialists, LLC. The Company is subject to
Executives
Gregory M Share director THREE FIRST NATIONAL PLZ, SUITE 3800, CHICAGO IL 60602
Tjon Sien Fat Karin - Joyce officer: EVP & CFO 501 KANSAS AVENUE, KANSAS CITY KS 66105
Kevin L Robert director 501 KANSAS AVENUE, KANSAS CITY KS 66105
Terry Matlack director 233 W 47TH ST, KANSAS CITY MO 64112

Epiq Systems (Epiq Systems) Headlines