GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Technology » Hardware » MTS Systems Corp (NAS:MTSC) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

MTS Systems (MTS Systems) Piotroski F-Score : 2 (As of May. 11, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 1990. Start your Free Trial

What is MTS Systems Piotroski F-Score?

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 2 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

MTS Systems has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for MTS Systems's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

MTSC' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1   Med: 6   Max: 9
Current: 2

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of MTS Systems was 9. The lowest was 1. And the median was 6.


MTS Systems Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for MTS Systems's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

MTS Systems Piotroski F-Score Chart

MTS Systems Annual Data
Trend Sep11 Sep12 Sep13 Sep14 Sep15 Sep16 Sep17 Sep18 Sep19 Sep20
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 5.00 6.00 4.00 4.00

MTS Systems Quarterly Data
Mar16 Jun16 Sep16 Dec16 Mar17 Jun17 Sep17 Dec17 Mar18 Jun18 Sep18 Dec18 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Mar20 Jun20 Sep20 Dec20
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 6.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 2.00

Competitive Comparison of MTS Systems's Piotroski F-Score

For the Scientific & Technical Instruments subindustry, MTS Systems's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


MTS Systems's Piotroski F-Score Distribution in the Hardware Industry

For the Hardware industry and Technology sector, MTS Systems's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where MTS Systems's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec20) TTM:Last Year (Dec19) TTM:
Net Income was -1.071 + 4.389 + -280.675 + 1.715 = $-275.6 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 3.164 + 15.999 + 34.429 + 19.254 = $72.8 Mil.
Revenue was 211.463 + 196.225 + 215.055 + 198.804 = $821.5 Mil.
Gross Profit was 71.241 + 65.495 + 75.043 + 74.415 = $286.2 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec19)
to the end of this year (Dec20) was
(1329.419 + 1423.848 + 1423.12 + 1150.231 + 1168.243) / 5 = $1298.9722 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec19) was $1,329.4 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $541.2 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $528.4 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $313.7 Mil.
Net Income was 14.16 + 13.585 + 4.821 + 5.306 = $37.9 Mil.

Revenue was 233.046 + 232.209 + 224.082 + 205.843 = $895.2 Mil.
Gross Profit was 87.35 + 85.103 + 78.172 + 76.609 = $327.2 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec18)
to the end of last year (Dec19) was
(1247.864 + 1260.634 + 1257.319 + 1297.977 + 1329.419) / 5 = $1278.6426 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec18) was $1,247.9 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $483.2 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $460.8 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $270.4 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

MTS Systems's current Net Income (TTM) was -275.6. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

MTS Systems's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 72.8. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec19)
=-275.642/1329.419
=-0.2073402

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec18)
=37.872/1247.864
=0.03034946

MTS Systems's return on assets of this year was -0.2073402. MTS Systems's return on assets of last year was 0.03034946. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

MTS Systems's current Net Income (TTM) was -275.6. MTS Systems's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 72.8. ==> 72.8 > -275.6 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Dec20)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec19 to Dec20
=541.228/1298.9722
=0.41665865

Gearing (Last Year: Dec19)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec18 to Dec19
=483.216/1278.6426
=0.37791327

MTS Systems's gearing of this year was 0.41665865. MTS Systems's gearing of last year was 0.37791327. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Dec20)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=528.444/313.66
=1.68476695

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec19)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=460.816/270.443
=1.70393022

MTS Systems's current ratio of this year was 1.68476695. MTS Systems's current ratio of last year was 1.70393022. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

MTS Systems's number of shares in issue this year was 19.476. MTS Systems's number of shares in issue last year was 19.369. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=286.194/821.547
=0.34835986

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=327.234/895.18
=0.36555106

MTS Systems's gross margin of this year was 0.34835986. MTS Systems's gross margin of last year was 0.36555106. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec19)
=821.547/1329.419
=0.61797447

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec18)
=895.18/1247.864
=0.71736984

MTS Systems's asset turnover of this year was 0.61797447. MTS Systems's asset turnover of last year was 0.71736984. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+1+0+1+0+0+0+0+0
=2

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

MTS Systems has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

MTS Systems  (NAS:MTSC) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


MTS Systems Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of MTS Systems's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


MTS Systems (MTS Systems) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
14000 Technology Drive, Eden Prairie, MN, USA, 55344
MTS Systems Corp is a supplier of test systems and position sensors. Its operations are organized and managed in two business segments; the Test and Simulation segment and the Sensors segment. Test and Simulation segment (Test) provides testing solutions including hardware, software, and services which are used by customers in product development to characterize the product's mechanical properties. Sensors segment (Sensors) is an in sensing technologies and solutions used by design engineers and predictive maintenance professionals, serving customers with a focus on total customer satisfaction, and offering regional support to provide and reliable sensing solutions.
Executives
Randy J Martinez director, Interim CEO HLH BUILDING, 101 WORLD DRIVE, PEACHTREE CITY GA 30269
Todd Klemmensen officer: SVP, GC and Corp. Sec. 14000 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344-2290
Steven B Harrison officer: EVP & Pres. Test & Simulation 14000 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344
Brian T Ross officer: EVP & CFO 14000 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344
Jeffrey A Graves director, officer: President and CEO C/O C&D TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 1400 UNION MEETING RD, BLUE BELL PA 19422
David Hore officer: EVP & Pres. Sensors 14000 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344
David J Anderson director 402 FARRINGTON DRIVE, LINCOLNSHIRE IL 60069
Linda Zukauckas director 200 VESEY STREET, NEW YORK NY 10285
Chun Hung Yu director 14000 TECHNOLOGY DR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344
David D Johnson director C/O MOLEX, INCORPORATED, 2222 WELLINGTON COURT, LISLE IL 60532
Nancy A. Altobello director 520 MADISON AVENUE, NEW YORK NY 10022
Michael V Schrock director 5500 WAYZATA BLVD., SUITE 800, GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55416
William C Becker officer: SVP Test & Simulation Comm Ops 14000 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344
Gail P Steinel director 909 ROSE AVENUE - SUITE 200, NORTH BETHESDA MD 20852
Maximiliane C Straub director 14000 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344

MTS Systems (MTS Systems) Headlines

From GuruFocus