GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Industrials » Business Services » Checkpoint Systems Inc (NYSE:CKP) » Definitions » Beneish M-Score

Checkpoint Systems (Checkpoint Systems) Beneish M-Score : 0.00 (As of May. 14, 2024)


View and export this data going back to . Start your Free Trial

What is Checkpoint Systems Beneish M-Score?

The zones of discrimination for M-Score is as such:

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.
An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

The historical rank and industry rank for Checkpoint Systems's Beneish M-Score or its related term are showing as below:

During the past 13 years, the highest Beneish M-Score of Checkpoint Systems was 0.00. The lowest was 0.00. And the median was 0.00.


Checkpoint Systems Beneish M-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Checkpoint Systems's Beneish M-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Checkpoint Systems Beneish M-Score Chart

Checkpoint Systems Annual Data
Trend Dec06 Dec07 Dec08 Dec09 Dec10 Dec11 Dec12 Dec13 Dec14 Dec15
Beneish M-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -2.66 -3.77 -2.66 -3.11 -3.09

Checkpoint Systems Quarterly Data
Jun11 Sep11 Dec11 Mar12 Jun12 Sep12 Dec12 Mar13 Jun13 Sep13 Dec13 Mar14 Jun14 Sep14 Dec14 Mar15 Jun15 Sep15 Dec15 Mar16
Beneish M-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -3.15 -3.11 -2.90 -3.09 -3.15

Competitive Comparison of Checkpoint Systems's Beneish M-Score

For the Security & Protection Services subindustry, Checkpoint Systems's Beneish M-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Beneish M-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Checkpoint Systems's Beneish M-Score Distribution in the Business Services Industry

For the Business Services industry and Industrials sector, Checkpoint Systems's Beneish M-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Checkpoint Systems's Beneish M-Score falls into.



Checkpoint Systems Beneish M-Score Calculation

The M-score was created by Professor Messod Beneish. Instead of measuring the bankruptcy risk (Altman Z-Score) or business trend (Piotroski F-Score), M-score can be used to detect the risk of earnings manipulation. This is the original research paper on M-score.

The M-Score Variables:

The M-score of Checkpoint Systems for today is based on a combination of the following eight different indices:

M=-4.84+0.92 * DSRI+0.528 * GMI+0.404 * AQI+0.892 * SGI+0.115 * DEPI
=-4.84+0.92 * 1.0585+0.528 * 1.0809+0.404 * 1.0113+0.892 * 0.8986+0.115 * 1.0298
-0.172 * SGAI+4.679 * TATA-0.327 * LVGI
-0.172 * 1.0381+4.679 * -0.126841-0.327 * 1.2419
=-3.15

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar16) TTM:Last Year (Mar15) TTM:
Total Receivables was $95.8 Mil.
Revenue was 119.314 + 165.135 + 145.93 + 147.55 = $577.9 Mil.
Gross Profit was 44.328 + 67.654 + 58.726 + 61.497 = $232.2 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $314.0 Mil.
Total Assets was $631.2 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was $77.2 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was $24.4 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was $203.8 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $175.1 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $70.4 Mil.
Net Income was -32.521 + -10.173 + -3.991 + -9.492 = $-56.2 Mil.
Non Operating Income was 0.056 + -0.387 + 0.852 + -0.859 = $-0.3 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -13.703 + 29.787 + 8.068 + 0.067 = $24.2 Mil.
Total Receivables was $100.7 Mil.
Revenue was 128.542 + 183.114 + 160.595 + 170.925 = $643.2 Mil.
Gross Profit was 56.537 + 79.326 + 70.965 + 72.507 = $279.3 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $344.3 Mil.
Total Assets was $676.7 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was $78.0 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was $25.7 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was $218.5 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $146.8 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $65.1 Mil.




1. DSRI = Days Sales in Receivables Index

Measured as the ratio of Revenue in Total Receivables in year t to year t-1.

A large increase in DSR could be indicative of revenue inflation.

DSRI=(Receivables_t / Revenue_t) / (Receivables_t-1 / Revenue_t-1)
=(95.778 / 577.929) / (100.696 / 643.176)
=0.165726 / 0.156561
=1.0585

2. GMI = Gross Margin Index

Measured as the ratio of gross margin in year t-1 to gross margin in year t.

Gross margin has deteriorated when this index is above 1. A firm with poorer prospects is more likely to manipulate earnings.

GMI=GrossMargin_t-1 / GrossMargin_t
=(GrossProfit_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) / (GrossProfit_t / Revenue_t)
=(279.335 / 643.176) / (232.205 / 577.929)
=0.434306 / 0.401788
=1.0809

3. AQI = Asset Quality Index

AQI is the ratio of asset quality in year t to year t-1.

Asset quality is measured as the ratio of non-current assets other than Property, Plant and Equipment to Total Assets.

AQI=(1 - (CurrentAssets_t + PPE_t) / TotalAssets_t) / (1 - (CurrentAssets_t-1 + PPE_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=(1 - (314.004 + 77.224) / 631.166) / (1 - (344.254 + 78.043) / 676.656)
=0.38015 / 0.375906
=1.0113

4. SGI = Sales Growth Index

Ratio of Revenue in year t to sales in year t-1.

Sales growth is not itself a measure of manipulation. However, growth companies are likely to find themselves under pressure to manipulate in order to keep up appearances.

SGI=Sales_t / Sales_t-1
=Revenue_t / Revenue_t-1
=577.929 / 643.176
=0.8986

5. DEPI = Depreciation Index

Measured as the ratio of the rate of Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization in year t-1 to the corresponding rate in year t.

DEPI greater than 1 indicates that assets are being depreciated at a slower rate. This suggests that the firm might be revising useful asset life assumptions upwards, or adopting a new method that is income friendly.

DEPI=(Depreciation_t-1 / (Depreciaton_t-1 + PPE_t-1)) / (Depreciation_t / (Depreciaton_t + PPE_t))
=(25.676 / (25.676 + 78.043)) / (24.438 / (24.438 + 77.224))
=0.247553 / 0.240385
=1.0298

Note: If the Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization data is not available, we assume that the depreciation rate is constant and set the Depreciation Index to 1.

6. SGAI = Sales, General and Administrative expenses Index

The ratio of Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) to Sales in year t relative to year t-1.

SGA expenses index > 1 means that the company is becoming less efficient in generate sales.

SGAI=(SGA_t / Sales_t) / (SGA_t-1 /Sales_t-1)
=(203.841 / 577.929) / (218.526 / 643.176)
=0.352709 / 0.339761
=1.0381

7. LVGI = Leverage Index

The ratio of total debt to Total Assets in year t relative to yeat t-1.

An LVGI > 1 indicates an increase in leverage

LVGI=((LTD_t + CurrentLiabilities_t) / TotalAssets_t) / ((LTD_t-1 + CurrentLiabilities_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=((70.372 + 175.128) / 631.166) / ((65.138 + 146.788) / 676.656)
=0.388963 / 0.313196
=1.2419

8. TATA = Total Accruals to Total Assets

Total accruals calculated as the change in working capital accounts other than cash less depreciation.

TATA=(IncomefromContinuingOperations_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(NetIncome_t - NonOperatingIncome_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(-56.177 - -0.338 - 24.219) / 631.166
=-0.126841

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator. An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Checkpoint Systems has a M-score of -3.15 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.


Checkpoint Systems Beneish M-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Checkpoint Systems's Beneish M-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Checkpoint Systems (Checkpoint Systems) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
Checkpoint Systems Inc was founded in 1969. Company is a manufacturer and provider of technology-driven loss prevention, inventory management and labeling solutions to the retail and apparel industries. It also provides electronic article surveillance systems and tags using RF and electro-magnetic technology. It also engineer systems using RF and acousto-magnetic technology. It operates directly in 28 countries. Its products are developed and manufactured in-house and sold through direct distribution and reseller channels. Company reported its results of operations in three segments: Merchandise Availability Solutions (MAS), Apparel Labeling Solutions (ALS), and Retail Merchandising Solutions (RMS). ALS includes the results of radio frequency identification (RFID) labels business, coupled with data management platform and network of service bureaus that manage the printing of variable information on apparel labels and tags. MAS segment, which is focused on loss prevention and Merchandise Visibility (RFID), includes EAS systems, EAS consumables, Alpha high-theft solutions, RFID systems and software and CheckView in Asia. There were no changes to the RMS Segment. Its competitors include: Tyco International Ltd., Avery Dennison Corporation, SML Group, R-Pac International Corporation, NexGen, Fineline Technologies, SATO DCS & Labeling Worldwide, Garvey Products Inc., Hallo, Avery Dennison Corporation, and Prix International.
Executives
Dan Maurer director C/O ZAGG INC., 3855 SOUTH 500 WEST, SUITE N, SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115
Stephen N David director C/O CNO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., 11825 NORTH PENNSYLVANIA STREET, CARMEL IN 46032
George Jr Babich director, officer: CEO and President 3111 W ALLEGHENY AVE, PHILADELPHIA PA 19132
Marc T Giles director 1 COLONIAL ROAD, MANCHESTER CT 06042
Jack W Partridge director
Julie Spicer England director 1665 SCENIC AVENUE, SUITE 250, COSTA MESA CA 92626
Antle William S Iii director C/O ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC., 9900 A CLAYTON ROAD, ST. LOUIS MO 63124
Rowland Bryan T.r. officer: See Remarks 101 WOLF DRIVE, THOROFARE NJ 08086
Van Der Merwe Robert P director, officer: Chairman, President and CEO
George W Off director C/O TDS, 30 N LASALLE STREET SUITE 4000, CHICAGO IL 60602
Robert O Aders director