GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Technology » Hardware » Ultrapay Limited (ASX:ULT) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

Ultrapay Limited (ASX:ULT) Piotroski F-Score : 0 (As of May. 22, 2024)


View and export this data going back to . Start your Free Trial

What is Ultrapay Limited Piotroski F-Score?

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Ultrapay Limited has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Ultrapay Limited's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:


Ultrapay Limited Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Ultrapay Limited's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Ultrapay Limited Piotroski F-Score Chart

Ultrapay Limited Annual Data
Trend Jun97 Jun98 Jun99 Jun00 Jun01 Jun02 Jun03 Jun04 Jun05 Jun06
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 4.00 7.00 1.00 2.00

Ultrapay Limited Semi-Annual Data
Dec96 Jun97 Dec98 Jun99 Dec99 Jun00 Dec00 Jun01 Dec01 Jun02 Dec02 Jun03 Dec03 Jun04 Dec04 Jun05 Dec05 Jun06 Dec06
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only - 1.00 - 2.00 -

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Jun06) TTM:Last Year (Jun05) TTM:
Net Income was A$-12.60 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was A$-2.45 Mil.
Revenue was A$0.67 Mil.
Gross Profit was A$0.67 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Jun05)
to the end of this year (Jun06) was (11.353 + 8.417) / 2 = A$9.885 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Jun05) was A$11.35 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was A$2.20 Mil.
Total Current Assets was A$3.92 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was A$4.94 Mil.
Net Income was A$-3.32 Mil.

Revenue was A$3.61 Mil.
Gross Profit was A$3.61 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Jun04)
to the end of last year (Jun05) was (8.312 + 11.353) / 2 = A$9.8325 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Jun04) was A$8.31 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was A$0.98 Mil.
Total Current Assets was A$1.65 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was A$2.55 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Ultrapay Limited's current Net Income (TTM) was -12.60. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Ultrapay Limited's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -2.45. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun05)
=-12.6/11.353
=-1.10983881

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun04)
=-3.322/8.312
=-0.39966314

Ultrapay Limited's return on assets of this year was -1.10983881. Ultrapay Limited's return on assets of last year was -0.39966314. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Ultrapay Limited's current Net Income (TTM) was -12.60. Ultrapay Limited's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -2.45. ==> -2.45 > -12.60 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Jun06)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun05 to Jun06
=2.198/9.885
=0.22235711

Gearing (Last Year: Jun05)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun04 to Jun05
=0.978/9.8325
=0.09946606

Ultrapay Limited's gearing of this year was 0.22235711. Ultrapay Limited's gearing of last year was 0.09946606. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Jun06)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=3.916/4.942
=0.79239174

Current Ratio (Last Year: Jun05)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=1.647/2.554
=0.64487079

Ultrapay Limited's current ratio of this year was 0.79239174. Ultrapay Limited's current ratio of last year was 0.64487079. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Ultrapay Limited's number of shares in issue this year was 67.677. Ultrapay Limited's number of shares in issue last year was 40.753. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0.667/0.667
=1

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=3.608/3.608
=1

Ultrapay Limited's gross margin of this year was 1. Ultrapay Limited's gross margin of last year was 1. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Jun05)
=0.667/11.353
=0.05875099

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Jun04)
=3.608/8.312
=0.43407122

Ultrapay Limited's asset turnover of this year was 0.05875099. Ultrapay Limited's asset turnover of last year was 0.43407122. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+1+0+1+0+0+0
=2

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Ultrapay Limited has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Ultrapay Limited  (ASX:ULT) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Ultrapay Limited Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Ultrapay Limited's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Ultrapay Limited (ASX:ULT) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
Website

Ultrapay Limited (ASX:ULT) Headlines

No Headlines