GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Technology » Hardware » Dot Hill Systems Corp (NAS:HILL) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

Dot Hill Systems (Dot Hill Systems) Piotroski F-Score : 0 (As of May. 05, 2024)


View and export this data going back to . Start your Free Trial

What is Dot Hill Systems Piotroski F-Score?

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Dot Hill Systems has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Dot Hill Systems's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:


Dot Hill Systems Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Dot Hill Systems's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Dot Hill Systems Piotroski F-Score Chart

Dot Hill Systems Annual Data
Trend Dec05 Dec06 Dec07 Dec08 Dec09 Dec10 Dec11 Dec12 Dec13 Dec14
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 4.00 5.00 7.00 6.00

Dot Hill Systems Quarterly Data
Sep10 Dec10 Mar11 Jun11 Sep11 Dec11 Mar12 Jun12 Sep12 Dec12 Mar13 Jun13 Sep13 Dec13 Mar14 Jun14 Sep14 Dec14 Mar15 Jun15
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 8.00 8.00 6.00 6.00 7.00

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Jun15) TTM:Last Year (Jun14) TTM:
Net Income was 0.04 + 8.505 + 3.871 + 0.685 = $13.1 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 1.879 + 2.082 + 6.469 + 1.552 = $12.0 Mil.
Revenue was 52.121 + 69.115 + 61.121 + 61.539 = $243.9 Mil.
Gross Profit was 16.962 + 24.325 + 21.03 + 20.134 = $82.5 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Jun14)
to the end of this year (Jun15) was
(95.544 + 104.569 + 120.232 + 118.305 + 123.677) / 5 = $112.4654 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Jun14) was $95.5 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.0 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $109.8 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $46.4 Mil.
Net Income was 1.757 + 2.212 + -0.412 + -0.078 = $3.5 Mil.

Revenue was 52.603 + 58.799 + 48.207 + 48.222 = $207.8 Mil.
Gross Profit was 16.873 + 17.75 + 15.265 + 16.023 = $65.9 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Jun13)
to the end of last year (Jun14) was
(88.115 + 92.034 + 105.384 + 96.586 + 95.544) / 5 = $95.5326 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Jun13) was $88.1 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.0 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $87.4 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $40.1 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Dot Hill Systems's current Net Income (TTM) was 13.1. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Dot Hill Systems's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 12.0. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun14)
=13.101/95.544
=0.13712007

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun13)
=3.479/88.115
=0.03948249

Dot Hill Systems's return on assets of this year was 0.13712007. Dot Hill Systems's return on assets of last year was 0.03948249. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Dot Hill Systems's current Net Income (TTM) was 13.1. Dot Hill Systems's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 12.0. ==> 12.0 <= 13.1 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Jun15)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun14 to Jun15
=0/112.4654
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Jun14)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun13 to Jun14
=0/95.5326
=0

Dot Hill Systems's gearing of this year was 0. Dot Hill Systems's gearing of last year was 0. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Jun15)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=109.757/46.355
=2.36774889

Current Ratio (Last Year: Jun14)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=87.365/40.087
=2.17938484

Dot Hill Systems's current ratio of this year was 2.36774889. Dot Hill Systems's current ratio of last year was 2.17938484. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Dot Hill Systems's number of shares in issue this year was 66.562. Dot Hill Systems's number of shares in issue last year was 60.159. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=82.451/243.896
=0.33805802

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=65.911/207.831
=0.31713748

Dot Hill Systems's gross margin of this year was 0.33805802. Dot Hill Systems's gross margin of last year was 0.31713748. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Jun14)
=243.896/95.544
=2.5527087

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Jun13)
=207.831/88.115
=2.3586336

Dot Hill Systems's asset turnover of this year was 2.5527087. Dot Hill Systems's asset turnover of last year was 2.3586336. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+0+1+1+0+1+1
=7

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Dot Hill Systems has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

Dot Hill Systems  (NAS:HILL) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Dot Hill Systems Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Dot Hill Systems's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Dot Hill Systems (Dot Hill Systems) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
Dot Hill Systems Corp was formed in 1999 by the combination of Box Hill Systems Corp., or Box Hill, and Artecon, Inc., or Artecon. It reincorporated in Delaware in 2001. It designs, manufactures and markets a range of software and hardware storage systems for the entry and mid-range storage markets. The Company sells its products through server-based original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), such as Hewlett-Packard, or HP, Dell Inc. or Dell, Lenovo Group Limited or Lenovo, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. or AMD, and Stratus Technologies or Stratus; as well as into vertical markets through embedded solutions OEM's, such as Teradata Corporation or Teradata, CGG Veritas or CGG, Motorola, Inc. or Motorola, Tektronix Inc. or Tektronix, Samsung Electronics or Samsung, Concurrent Computer Corporation or Concurrent, Autodesk Inc. or Autodesk, Harris Broadcast Communications and Nokia Siemens Network or Nokia Siemens, which primarily include media and entertainment, telecommunications, high performance computing, digital image archive, big data and oil and gas. The Company's products, from small capacity direct attached to complete multi-hundred terabyte, or TB, storage area networks, or SANs, provide end-users with a cost-effective means of addressing increasing storage demands at compelling price-performance points. The Company's current product family based on its AssuredSAN architecture provides high performance and large disk array capacities for a broad variety of environments, employing Fibre Channel, Internet Small Computer Systems Interface, or iSCSI and Serial Attached SCSI, or SAS, interconnects to switches and/or hosts. In addition, its Assured family of data protection software products provides additional layers of data protection options to complement its line of storage disk arrays. The Company's current mainstream 2000 and 3000 series of entry-level storage products and Just a Bunch of Disks, or JBOD, arrays are targeted primarily at mainstream enterprise and small-to-medium business, or SMB, applications. The Company's AssuredSAN products have been distinguished by certification as Network Equipment Building System, or NEBS, Level 3 (a telecommunications standard for equipment used in central offices) and are MIL-STD-810F (a military standard created by the U.S.government) compliant based on their ruggedness and reliability. In February 2010, it launched the latest AssuredSAN 3000 series of storage arrays that provide high speed interface options including 8 gigabyte, or GB, Fibre Channel, 1GB and 10GB iSCSI over Ethernet and 6GB SAS connectivity. The Company's AssuredUVS product line, formerly known as the intelligent storage networking system, or iSN TM, is based on the technology it acquired in January 2010 from Cloverleaf Communications, Inc., or Cloverleaf, a privately held software company focused on heterogeneous storage virtualization and unified storage technologies. AssuredSnap is its DMS software that introduces p
Executives
Charles F Christ director
Barry Rudolph director 1351 S SUNSET STREET, LONGMONT CO 80501
Ernest J Sampias director 1600 BROADWAY, SUITE 2200, DENVER CO 80202
Dana Kammersgard director, officer: President & CEO 6305 EL CAMINO REAL, CARLSBAD CA 92009
Richard Jr Mejia director 2200 FARADAY AVENUE, SUITE 100, CARLSBAD CA 92008
Kimberly Alexy director 500 MCCARTHY BLVD., MILPITAS CA 95035
Philip Davis officer: Ex. VP WW Field Operations 6305 EL CAMINO REAL, CARLSBAD CA 92009
Chong Sup Park director 22071 DORSEY WAY, SARATOGA CA 95070

Dot Hill Systems (Dot Hill Systems) Headlines

From GuruFocus

Dot Hill Systems Looks Promising

By Mrinalini Chaudhuri TaniaC 05-31-2015