* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
Competitive Comparison of Tang Palace (China) Holdings's Piotroski F-Score
For the Restaurants subindustry, Tang Palace (China) Holdings's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Tang Palace (China) Holdings's Piotroski F-Score Distribution in the Restaurants Industry
For the Restaurants industry and Consumer Cyclical sector, Tang Palace (China) Holdings's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Tang Palace (China) Holdings's Piotroski F-Score falls into.
How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.
Profitability
Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)
Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.
Tang Palace (China) Holdings's current Net Income (TTM) was 46.
==> Positive ==> Score 1.
Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)
Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.
Tang Palace (China) Holdings's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 162.
==> Positive ==> Score 1.
Question 3. Change in Return on Assets
Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.
Tang Palace (China) Holdings's return on assets of this year was 0.05422335. Tang Palace (China) Holdings's return on assets of last year was -0.13312482.
==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.
Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)
Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)
Tang Palace (China) Holdings's gearing of this year was 0.21800603. Tang Palace (China) Holdings's gearing of last year was 0.11077458.
==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.
Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)
Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.
Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower
Tang Palace (China) Holdings's current ratio of this year was 1.00546689. Tang Palace (China) Holdings's current ratio of last year was 1.04295802.
==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.
Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue
Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.
Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.
Tang Palace (China) Holdings's number of shares in issue this year was 1076.028. Tang Palace (China) Holdings's number of shares in issue last year was 1075.333.
==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.
Efficiency
Question 8. Change in Gross Margin
Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.
Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.
Tang Palace (China) Holdings's gross margin of this year was 0.274766. Tang Palace (China) Holdings's gross margin of last year was 0.15937656.
==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.
Question 9. Change in asset turnover
Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.
Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower
Tang Palace (China) Holdings's asset turnover of this year was 1.4604181. Tang Palace (China) Holdings's asset turnover of last year was 0.83081972.
==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.
Evaluation
Piotroski F-Score
=
Que. 1
+
Que. 2
+
Que. 3
+
Que. 4
+
Que. 5
+
Que. 6
+
Que. 7
+
Que. 8
+
Que. 9
=
1
+
1
+
1
+
1
+
0
+
0
+
0
+
1
+
1
=
6
Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3
Tang Palace (China) Holdings has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.
The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.
He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.
He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.
What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.
Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.
Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).
Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.
Tang Palace (China) Holdings Piotroski F-Score Related Terms
Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Tang Palace (China) Holdings's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.
Tang Palace (China) Holdings (HKSE:01181) Business Description
Tang Palace (China) Holdings Ltd is an investment holding company engaged in restaurant operations and food production. The primary production of the group is located in the People's Republic of China. It offers new dishes, seasonal foods, festive celebrations, basic sauce, food ingredient, and casual dining of different regional cuisines. The company has four operating segments - the Southern China region, the Eastern China region, the Northern China region, and the Western China region. Majority of its revenue is generated from the Eastern China segment. The company operates restaurants under the Soup Delice, Tang Palace, Tang's Cuisine, Tang Palace Seafood Restaurant, Canton Tea Room, Social Place, Pepper Lunch, and PappaRich, brands.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
Portfolio Contest
HKSE:01181 has been successfully added to your 