GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Industrials » Construction » Chengdu Expressway Co Ltd (HKSE:01785) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

Chengdu Expressway Co (HKSE:01785) Piotroski F-Score : 8 (As of May. 15, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 2019. Start your Free Trial

What is Chengdu Expressway Co Piotroski F-Score?

Good Sign:

Piotroski F-Score is 8, indicates a very healthy situation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Chengdu Expressway Co has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Chengdu Expressway Co's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

HKSE:01785' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4   Med: 6   Max: 9
Current: 8

During the past 9 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Chengdu Expressway Co was 9. The lowest was 4. And the median was 6.


Chengdu Expressway Co Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Chengdu Expressway Co's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Chengdu Expressway Co Piotroski F-Score Chart

Chengdu Expressway Co Annual Data
Trend Dec15 Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only 8.00 4.00 9.00 5.00 8.00

Chengdu Expressway Co Quarterly Data
Dec15 Dec16 Jun17 Dec17 Jun18 Dec18 Jun19 Dec19 Jun20 Dec20 Jun21 Dec21 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 - - 8.00 -

Competitive Comparison of Chengdu Expressway Co's Piotroski F-Score

For the Infrastructure Operations subindustry, Chengdu Expressway Co's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Chengdu Expressway Co's Piotroski F-Score Distribution in the Construction Industry

For the Construction industry and Industrials sector, Chengdu Expressway Co's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Chengdu Expressway Co's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec23) TTM:Last Year (Sep22) TTM:
Net Income was 44.232 + 0 + 211.98 + 111.546 = HK$368 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = HK$0 Mil.
Revenue was 702.84 + 0 + 868.54 + 751.054 = HK$2,322 Mil.
Gross Profit was 180.498 + 0 + 320.391 + 245.579 = HK$746 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Sep22)
to the end of this year (Dec23) was
(0 + 10238.879 + 10264.073 + 9938.495 + 10122.647) / 5 = HK$10141.0235 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Sep22) was HK$0 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was HK$2,756 Mil.
Total Current Assets was HK$2,923 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was HK$1,200 Mil.
Net Income was 0 + 0 + 0 + 177.646 = HK$178 Mil.

Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 663.634 = HK$664 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 261.735 = HK$262 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec20)
to the end of last year (Sep22) was
(10748.801 + 10926.607 + 11213.351 + 10797.579 + 0) / 5 = HK$10921.5845 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec20) was HK$10,749 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was HK$0 Mil.
Total Current Assets was HK$0 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was HK$0 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Chengdu Expressway Co's current Net Income (TTM) was 368. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Chengdu Expressway Co's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 0. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Sep22)
=367.758/0
=

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec20)
=177.646/10748.801
=0.01652705

Chengdu Expressway Co's return on assets of this year was . Chengdu Expressway Co's return on assets of last year was 0.01652705. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Chengdu Expressway Co's current Net Income (TTM) was 368. Chengdu Expressway Co's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 0. ==> 0 <= 368 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Dec23)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Sep22 to Dec23
=2756.35/10141.0235
=0.27180195

Gearing (Last Year: Sep22)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec20 to Sep22
=0/10921.5845
=0

Chengdu Expressway Co's gearing of this year was 0.27180195. Chengdu Expressway Co's gearing of last year was 0. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Dec23)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=2923.13/1199.528
=2.43690018

Current Ratio (Last Year: Sep22)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0/0
=

Chengdu Expressway Co's current ratio of this year was 2.43690018. Chengdu Expressway Co's current ratio of last year was . ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Chengdu Expressway Co's number of shares in issue this year was 1656.102. Chengdu Expressway Co's number of shares in issue last year was 1656.102. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=746.468/2322.434
=0.32141624

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=261.735/663.634
=0.39439661

Chengdu Expressway Co's gross margin of this year was 0.32141624. Chengdu Expressway Co's gross margin of last year was 0.39439661. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Sep22)
=2322.434/0
=

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec20)
=663.634/10748.801
=0.06174028

Chengdu Expressway Co's asset turnover of this year was . Chengdu Expressway Co's asset turnover of last year was 0.06174028. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+0+0+0+0+1+1+0+0
=3

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Chengdu Expressway Co has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Chengdu Expressway Co  (HKSE:01785) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Chengdu Expressway Co Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Chengdu Expressway Co's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Chengdu Expressway Co (HKSE:01785) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
No. 66 Shenghe 1st Road, 9th Floor, Chengnan Tianfu Building, High-Tech Zone, Sichuan, Chengdu, CHN
Chengdu Expressway Co Ltd is principally engaged in the operation, management and development of expressways located in and around Chengdu, Sichuan Province. Meanwhile, the Group also carries out retail of refined oil and operation of CNG. It operates in two reportable segments the Expressway segment segment comprises the construction, operation and maintenance of toll expressways located in Sichuan province; and the Energy Investment segment comprises the operation of petrol stations and a gas station and sales of refined oil and compressed natural gas. It derives majority of the revenue from Expressway segment.

Chengdu Expressway Co (HKSE:01785) Headlines

No Headlines