GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Industrials » Business Services » Rentrak Corp (NAS:RENT) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

Rentrak (Rentrak) Piotroski F-Score : 0 (As of Apr. 26, 2024)


View and export this data going back to . Start your Free Trial

What is Rentrak Piotroski F-Score?

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Rentrak has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Rentrak's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:


Rentrak Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Rentrak's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Rentrak Piotroski F-Score Chart

Rentrak Annual Data
Trend Mar06 Mar07 Mar08 Mar09 Mar10 Mar11 Mar12 Mar13 Mar14 Mar15
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 3.00 2.00 7.00 7.00

Rentrak Quarterly Data
Dec10 Mar11 Jun11 Sep11 Dec11 Mar12 Jun12 Sep12 Dec12 Mar13 Jun13 Sep13 Dec13 Mar14 Jun14 Sep14 Dec14 Mar15 Jun15 Sep15
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 6.00 5.00 7.00 7.00 7.00

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Sep15) TTM:Last Year (Sep14) TTM:
Net Income was -2.287 + 1.639 + 1.568 + 1.304 = $2.2 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 4.698 + -0.937 + -3.047 + 5.818 = $6.5 Mil.
Revenue was 26.874 + 28.463 + 27.529 + 32.802 = $115.7 Mil.
Gross Profit was 17.336 + 17.797 + 17.636 + 22.768 = $75.5 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Sep14)
to the end of this year (Sep15) was
(84.961 + 286.406 + 284.523 + 283.437 + 288.627) / 5 = $245.5908 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Sep14) was $85.0 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.0 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $102.4 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $24.4 Mil.
Net Income was -0.343 + -2.086 + -0.966 + -0.374 = $-3.8 Mil.

Revenue was 19.517 + 21.558 + 22.344 + 25.241 = $88.7 Mil.
Gross Profit was 12.697 + 14.249 + 14.74 + 17.201 = $58.9 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Sep13)
to the end of last year (Sep14) was
(77.437 + 82.55 + 81.267 + 78.968 + 84.961) / 5 = $81.0366 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Sep13) was $77.4 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.0 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $44.4 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $23.3 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Rentrak's current Net Income (TTM) was 2.2. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Rentrak's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 6.5. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Sep14)
=2.224/84.961
=0.02617672

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Sep13)
=-3.769/77.437
=-0.04867182

Rentrak's return on assets of this year was 0.02617672. Rentrak's return on assets of last year was -0.04867182. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Rentrak's current Net Income (TTM) was 2.2. Rentrak's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 6.5. ==> 6.5 > 2.2 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Sep15)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Sep14 to Sep15
=0/245.5908
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Sep14)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Sep13 to Sep14
=0/81.0366
=0

Rentrak's gearing of this year was 0. Rentrak's gearing of last year was 0. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Sep15)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=102.399/24.404
=4.19599246

Current Ratio (Last Year: Sep14)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=44.437/23.292
=1.90782243

Rentrak's current ratio of this year was 4.19599246. Rentrak's current ratio of last year was 1.90782243. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Rentrak's number of shares in issue this year was 16.354. Rentrak's number of shares in issue last year was 12.514. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=75.537/115.668
=0.65305011

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=58.887/88.66
=0.66418904

Rentrak's gross margin of this year was 0.65305011. Rentrak's gross margin of last year was 0.66418904. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Sep14)
=115.668/84.961
=1.36142465

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Sep13)
=88.66/77.437
=1.14493072

Rentrak's asset turnover of this year was 1.36142465. Rentrak's asset turnover of last year was 1.14493072. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+1+1+1+0+0+1
=7

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Rentrak has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

Rentrak  (NAS:RENT) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Rentrak Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Rentrak's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Rentrak (Rentrak) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
Rentrak Corp is an Oregon corporation and was incorporated in 1977. It is a media measurement and information company serving the entertainment, television, video and advertising industries. The Company's Software as a Service technology merges census-based television viewership information from over 100 million TVs and devices with consumer behavior and purchase information across multiple platforms, devices and distribution channels. It also measures box office results from more than 125,000 movie screens in 47 countries. The Company processes and aggregates billions of data transactions from multiple screens wherever entertainment content is viewed, whether at the box office, on a television screen, over the internet, on a smart phone or other portable device. It measures live TV, recorded TV, Video-On-Demand and whether the content is free, purchased, rented, recorded, downloaded or streamed from multiple channels. These content databases provide stable and granular viewership information across every screen and are anonymously matched with third-party consumer segmentation and purchase databases using privacy compliant methodologies. By linking multiscreen viewership information with information about the products viewers consume and prefer, the Company provides its clients, such as content producers, distributors, advertisers and advertising agencies, with the knowledge necessary to effectively manage their businesses, program and market their networks and precisely target and sell their advertising inventory. Additionally, certain clients of the Company use the databases to populate programmatic buying systems. These systems automate the buying process and introduce efficiencies for both advertising agencies and their clients. The Company's media measurement services are distributed through patent pending software systems and business processes into two areas within the entertainment industry: - Movies Everywhere and TV Everywhere. The Company's Entertainment Essentials services are: TV Everywhere including TV Essentials and StationView Essentials; OnDemand Everywhere includes OnDemand Essentials, Over the Top measurement products and related products; Movies Everywhere includes domestic and international Box Office Essentials, PostTrak and PreAct; and Other Services include Studio Direct Revenue Sharing and other products relating to content in the home video rental industry. The Company's primary competitors are Nielsen, Kantar and TiVo. It owns two patents directed to techniques for extracting revenue information from point-of-sale terminals, as well as nine patents for linear data collection, projections and analysis. Among the linear TV patents are two for our sophisticated TV-off methodology, which accurately accounts for cases when the TV is turned off but the set-top box.
Executives
David I. Chemerow officer: Chief Operating Officer & CFO PLAYBOY ENT., INC. - H. SHAPIRO, 680 N LAKE SHORE DRIVE, CHICAGO IL 60611
Brent David Rosenthal director C/O WR HUFF ASSET MANAGEMENT, 67 PARK PLACE, MORRISTOWN NJ 07960
Ralph R Shaw director 3438 SW BRENTWOOD DRIVE, PORTLAND OR 97201
William Paul Livek director, officer: Chief Executive Officer P O BOX 18888, PORTLAND OR 97218
William E Engel director C/O RENTRAK CORPORATION, 7700 NE AMBASSADOR PLACE, PORTLAND OR 97220-1393
Plc Wpp 10 percent owner SEA CONTAINERS, 18 UPPER GROUND, LONDON X0 SE1 9GL
Patricia A. Gottesman director C/O WORLD WRESTLING ENTERTAINMENT, INC., 1241 EAST MAIN STREET, STAMFORD CT 06902
Wpp Luxembourg Gamma Three S.a.r.l. 10 percent owner 124 BOULEVARD DE LA PETRUSSE, LUXEMBOURG N4 L-2330
Anne Macdonald director 200 CARILLON PARKWAY, ST PETERSBURG FL 33716
Michelle Spencer officer: Sr VP Finance & Dep. CFO RENTRAK CORPORATION, 7700 NE AMBASSADOR PLACE, PORTLAND OR 97220
Christopher T Wilson officer: President, National Linear TV 7700 NE AMBASSADOR PLACE, PORTLAND OR 97220
Richard Hochhauser director
Paul A Rosenbaum director, officer: Chairman of the Board 2945 NW LURAY TERRACE, PORTLAND OR 97210
Thomas D Allen director 2101 E FOURTH ST, STE 202, SANTA ANA CA 92705
Cecil D Andrus director 350 N NINTH STREET, SUITE 202, BOISE ID 83702

Rentrak (Rentrak) Headlines

From GuruFocus

Rent the Runway to Participate in Upcoming Investor Conferences

By sperokesalga sperokesalga 02-27-2023

Rent the Runway to Participate in Upcoming Investor Conferences

By sperokesalga sperokesalga 06-05-2023