GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Healthcare » Biotechnology » Functional Technologies Corp (TSXV:FEB.H) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

Functional Technologies (TSXV:FEB.H) Piotroski F-Score : 0 (As of May. 25, 2024)


View and export this data going back to . Start your Free Trial

What is Functional Technologies Piotroski F-Score?

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Functional Technologies has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Functional Technologies's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:


Functional Technologies Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Functional Technologies's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Functional Technologies Piotroski F-Score Chart

Functional Technologies Annual Data
Trend Aug03 Aug04 Aug05 Aug06 Aug07 Aug08 Aug09 Aug10 Aug11 Aug12
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 2.00 3.00 1.00 5.00 1.00

Functional Technologies Semi-Annual Data
Aug01 Aug02 Aug03 Aug04 Aug05 Aug06 Aug07 Aug08 Aug09 Aug10 Aug11 Aug12
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 2.00 3.00 1.00 5.00 1.00

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Aug12) TTM:Last Year (Aug11) TTM:
Net Income was C$-12.64 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was C$-3.75 Mil.
Revenue was C$0.18 Mil.
Gross Profit was C$-0.08 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Aug11)
to the end of this year (Aug12) was (11 + 2.733) / 2 = C$6.8665 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Aug11) was C$11.00 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was C$0.59 Mil.
Total Current Assets was C$0.75 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was C$5.57 Mil.
Net Income was C$-4.84 Mil.

Revenue was C$0.20 Mil.
Gross Profit was C$0.07 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Aug10)
to the end of last year (Aug11) was (7.979 + 11) / 2 = C$9.4895 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Aug10) was C$7.98 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was C$1.31 Mil.
Total Current Assets was C$5.11 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was C$1.22 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Functional Technologies's current Net Income (TTM) was -12.64. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Functional Technologies's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -3.75. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Aug11)
=-12.636/11
=-1.14872727

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Aug10)
=-4.839/7.979
=-0.60646698

Functional Technologies's return on assets of this year was -1.14872727. Functional Technologies's return on assets of last year was -0.60646698. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Functional Technologies's current Net Income (TTM) was -12.64. Functional Technologies's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -3.75. ==> -3.75 > -12.64 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Aug12)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Aug11 to Aug12
=0.588/6.8665
=0.08563315

Gearing (Last Year: Aug11)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Aug10 to Aug11
=1.308/9.4895
=0.13783656

Functional Technologies's gearing of this year was 0.08563315. Functional Technologies's gearing of last year was 0.13783656. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Aug12)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.751/5.566
=0.13492634

Current Ratio (Last Year: Aug11)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=5.112/1.221
=4.18673219

Functional Technologies's current ratio of this year was 0.13492634. Functional Technologies's current ratio of last year was 4.18673219. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Functional Technologies's number of shares in issue this year was 0. Functional Technologies's number of shares in issue last year was 0. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=-0.079/0.176
=-0.44886364

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0.067/0.202
=0.33168317

Functional Technologies's gross margin of this year was -0.44886364. Functional Technologies's gross margin of last year was 0.33168317. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Aug11)
=0.176/11
=0.016

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Aug10)
=0.202/7.979
=0.02531646

Functional Technologies's asset turnover of this year was 0.016. Functional Technologies's asset turnover of last year was 0.02531646. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+1+1+0+1+0+0
=3

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Functional Technologies has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Functional Technologies  (TSXV:FEB.H) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Functional Technologies Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Functional Technologies's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Functional Technologies (TSXV:FEB.H) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
Functional Technologies Corp is incorporated under the corporate laws of British Columbia, Canada on October 18, 1999. The Company is a functional foods and biological health products company that is developing and commercializing advanced yeast products and other novel biological products for the food and health care industry. The company develops and commercializes proprietary, advanced yeast-based solutions to significant challenges in the food, beverage and healthcare industries, for which viable solutions are lacking. The Company's platform technologies improve the performance of innate yeast functions to primarily prevent the formation of naturally occurring toxins and contaminants that either affect final product quality or are classified by various global agencies as dangerous substances (e.g. carcinogens, neurotoxicants or reproductive toxicants). The Company operates in three geographic regions: Canada, Europe and the United States.

Functional Technologies (TSXV:FEB.H) Headlines

No Headlines