GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Industrials » Industrial Products » Legend Power Systems Inc (TSXV:LPS) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

Legend Power Systems (TSXV:LPS) Piotroski F-Score : 1 (As of May. 09, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 1989. Start your Free Trial

What is Legend Power Systems Piotroski F-Score?

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 1 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Legend Power Systems has an F-score of 1. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Legend Power Systems's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

TSXV:LPS' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1   Med: 4   Max: 6
Current: 1

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Legend Power Systems was 6. The lowest was 1. And the median was 4.


Legend Power Systems Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Legend Power Systems's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Legend Power Systems Piotroski F-Score Chart

Legend Power Systems Annual Data
Trend Sep14 Sep15 Sep16 Sep17 Sep18 Sep19 Sep20 Sep21 Sep22 Sep23
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 2.00 4.00 3.00 2.00

Legend Power Systems Quarterly Data
Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Mar20 Jun20 Sep20 Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 2.00 3.00 4.00 2.00 1.00

Competitive Comparison of Legend Power Systems's Piotroski F-Score

For the Electrical Equipment & Parts subindustry, Legend Power Systems's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Legend Power Systems's Piotroski F-Score Distribution in the Industrial Products Industry

For the Industrial Products industry and Industrials sector, Legend Power Systems's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Legend Power Systems's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec23) TTM:Last Year (Dec22) TTM:
Net Income was -1.188 + -1.019 + -0.97 + -1.081 = C$-4.26 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -0.519 + -0.934 + -0.459 + -1.045 = C$-2.96 Mil.
Revenue was 0.074 + 0.47 + 0.159 + 0.002 = C$0.71 Mil.
Gross Profit was -0.005 + 0.104 + -0.006 + -0.021 = C$0.07 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec22)
to the end of this year (Dec23) was
(5.157 + 4.195 + 3.416 + 5.229 + 4.201) / 5 = C$4.4396 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec22) was C$5.16 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was C$0.28 Mil.
Total Current Assets was C$3.69 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was C$0.88 Mil.
Net Income was -1.48 + -1.492 + -1.091 + -1.006 = C$-5.07 Mil.

Revenue was 0.344 + 1.026 + 0.579 + 0.403 = C$2.35 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0.058 + 0.049 + 0.061 + 0.101 = C$0.27 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec21)
to the end of last year (Dec22) was
(10.043 + 8.609 + 7.647 + 6.304 + 5.157) / 5 = C$7.552 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec21) was C$10.04 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was C$0.03 Mil.
Total Current Assets was C$4.85 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was C$0.60 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Legend Power Systems's current Net Income (TTM) was -4.26. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Legend Power Systems's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -2.96. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec22)
=-4.258/5.157
=-0.82567384

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec21)
=-5.069/10.043
=-0.50472966

Legend Power Systems's return on assets of this year was -0.82567384. Legend Power Systems's return on assets of last year was -0.50472966. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Legend Power Systems's current Net Income (TTM) was -4.26. Legend Power Systems's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -2.96. ==> -2.96 > -4.26 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Dec23)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec22 to Dec23
=0.284/4.4396
=0.06396973

Gearing (Last Year: Dec22)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec21 to Dec22
=0.032/7.552
=0.00423729

Legend Power Systems's gearing of this year was 0.06396973. Legend Power Systems's gearing of last year was 0.00423729. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Dec23)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=3.687/0.875
=4.21371429

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec22)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=4.848/0.598
=8.10702341

Legend Power Systems's current ratio of this year was 4.21371429. Legend Power Systems's current ratio of last year was 8.10702341. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Legend Power Systems's number of shares in issue this year was 131.694. Legend Power Systems's number of shares in issue last year was 117.569. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0.072/0.705
=0.10212766

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0.269/2.352
=0.11437075

Legend Power Systems's gross margin of this year was 0.10212766. Legend Power Systems's gross margin of last year was 0.11437075. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec22)
=0.705/5.157
=0.13670739

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec21)
=2.352/10.043
=0.23419297

Legend Power Systems's asset turnover of this year was 0.13670739. Legend Power Systems's asset turnover of last year was 0.23419297. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+1+0+0+0+0+0
=1

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Legend Power Systems has an F-score of 1. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Legend Power Systems  (TSXV:LPS) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Legend Power Systems Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Legend Power Systems's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Legend Power Systems (TSXV:LPS) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
Address
1480 Frances Street, Vancouver, BC, CAN, V5L 1Y9
Legend Power Systems Inc together with its subsidiaries provides electrical energy conservation solutions to commercial and industrial customers in Canada. The Company's principal business activities are the assembly, marketing and sale of a patented device which is the SmartGATE, which enables dynamic power management of an entire commercial or industrial building. Business operating segments are based on geographical location of sale and installation of the SmartGATE products: Legend Power Systems Canada and Legend Power Systems Corp - U.S. Geographically, it derives a majority of revenue from Canada and also has a presence in the United States.
Executives
David Dean Guebert Director

Legend Power Systems (TSXV:LPS) Headlines

No Headlines