GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Industrials » Industrial Products » China Ming Yang Wind Power Group Ltd (NYSE:MY) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

China Ming Yang Wind Power Group (China Ming Yang Wind Power Group) Piotroski F-Score : 0 (As of May. 05, 2024)


View and export this data going back to . Start your Free Trial

What is China Ming Yang Wind Power Group Piotroski F-Score?

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

China Ming Yang Wind Power Group has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for China Ming Yang Wind Power Group's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:


China Ming Yang Wind Power Group Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for China Ming Yang Wind Power Group's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

China Ming Yang Wind Power Group Piotroski F-Score Chart

China Ming Yang Wind Power Group Annual Data
Trend Dec08 Dec09 Dec10 Dec11 Dec12 Dec13 Dec14 Dec15
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial - - - - -

China Ming Yang Wind Power Group Quarterly Data
Mar11 Jun11 Sep11 Dec11 Mar12 Jun12 Sep12 Dec12 Mar13 Jun13 Sep13 Dec13 Mar14 Jun14 Sep14 Dec14 Mar15 Jun15 Sep15 Dec15
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only - 6.00 6.00 6.00 -

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec15) TTM:Last Year (Dec14) TTM:
Net Income was $36 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was $35 Mil.
Revenue was $1,054 Mil.
Gross Profit was $171 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec14)
to the end of this year (Dec15) was (2015.656 + 2578.082) / 2 = $2296.869 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec14) was $2,016 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $1,853 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $1,754 Mil.
Net Income was $58 Mil.

Revenue was $949 Mil.
Gross Profit was $131 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec13)
to the end of last year (Dec14) was (1866.42 + 2015.656) / 2 = $1941.038 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec13) was $1,866 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $1,456 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $1,341 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

China Ming Yang Wind Power Group's current Net Income (TTM) was 36. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

China Ming Yang Wind Power Group's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 35. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec14)
=36.047/2015.656
=0.01788351

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec13)
=57.931/1866.42
=0.03103857

China Ming Yang Wind Power Group's return on assets of this year was 0.01788351. China Ming Yang Wind Power Group's return on assets of last year was 0.03103857. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

China Ming Yang Wind Power Group's current Net Income (TTM) was 36. China Ming Yang Wind Power Group's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 35. ==> 35 <= 36 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Dec15)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec14 to Dec15
=0/2296.869
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Dec14)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec13 to Dec14
=0/1941.038
=0

China Ming Yang Wind Power Group's gearing of this year was 0. China Ming Yang Wind Power Group's gearing of last year was 0. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Dec15)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=1852.802/1753.634
=1.05655

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec14)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=1456.114/1341.444
=1.08548251

China Ming Yang Wind Power Group's current ratio of this year was 1.05655. China Ming Yang Wind Power Group's current ratio of last year was 1.08548251. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

China Ming Yang Wind Power Group's number of shares in issue this year was 145.384. China Ming Yang Wind Power Group's number of shares in issue last year was 125.321. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=170.677/1053.956
=0.1619394

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=131.381/948.912
=0.13845436

China Ming Yang Wind Power Group's gross margin of this year was 0.1619394. China Ming Yang Wind Power Group's gross margin of last year was 0.13845436. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec14)
=1053.956/2015.656
=0.52288486

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec13)
=948.912/1866.42
=0.5084129

China Ming Yang Wind Power Group's asset turnover of this year was 0.52288486. China Ming Yang Wind Power Group's asset turnover of last year was 0.5084129. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+0+0+1+0+0+1+1
=5

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

China Ming Yang Wind Power Group has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

China Ming Yang Wind Power Group  (NYSE:MY) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


China Ming Yang Wind Power Group Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of China Ming Yang Wind Power Group's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


China Ming Yang Wind Power Group (China Ming Yang Wind Power Group) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
China Ming Yang Wind Power Group Ltd founded in 2006. The Company is a wind turbine manufacturer in China, focusing on designing, manufacturing, selling and servicing megawatt-class wind turbines and the provision of related maintenance services in the People's Republic of China (the "PRC") and the Republic of India ("India"). Its current products consist of (i) basic models of wind turbines with a rated power capacity of 1.5MW, (ii) wind turbines with a rated power capacity of 2.0MW, and (iii) 2.5/3.0MW SCD wind turbines. Each product type may be installed with one of three rotor blade models depending on the location and wind conditions. 1.5MW wind turbines are widely used model in China. As of December 31, 2013, the Company had entered into sales contracts with 45 end customers to deliver 4,804 units of its wind turbines, representing wind power output of approximately 7,588.5MW. Its customers include five Chinese state-owned power producers, namely Huaneng, China Datang, Huadian, China Guodian Corporation, or Guodian, and China Power Investment Corporation, or CPIC, or their alternative energy subsidiaries, such as China Longyuan Power Group Corporation Limited, or Longyuan, a subsidiary of Guodian, and Datang Corporation Renewable Power Co., Limited, or Datang Renewable, a subsidiary of China Datang. The Company also sells wind turbines to regional alternative energy investment companies, regional power producers and wind farm operators in the private sector. Its facilities are currently located in Zhongshan, Tianjin, Jilin, Rudong, Dali, Inner Mongolia and Gansu (including Hami area) in China. The Company has two operating segments, which are manufacture and sale of wind turbines in PRC and the manufacture and sale of wind turbines in India. The Company competes with both domestic and international wind turbine manufacturers. Its domestic competitors include Sinovel, Goldwind, Dongfang Electric and United Power. Its key international competitors in China include Vestas from Denmark, Gamesa Corporación Tecnológica S.A. from Spain and GE Energy, the alternative energy arm of GE from the United States.In addition, the wind power industry also faces competition from conventional and non-wind power alternative energy technologies.

China Ming Yang Wind Power Group (China Ming Yang Wind Power Group) Headlines

No Headlines