GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Technology » Software » SMS Alternatives Inc (OTCPK:CICN) » Definitions » EBITDA

SMS Alternatives (SMS Alternatives) EBITDA : $-1.37 Mil (TTM As of Jun. 2020)


View and export this data going back to 1995. Start your Free Trial

What is SMS Alternatives EBITDA?

SMS Alternatives's EBITDA for the three months ended in Jun. 2020 was $-0.50 Mil. Its EBITDA for the trailing twelve months (TTM) ended in Jun. 2020 was $-1.37 Mil.

Please click Growth Rate Calculation Example (GuruFocus) to see how GuruFocus calculates Wal-Mart Stores Inc (WMT)'s revenue growth rate. You can apply the same method to get the EBITDA Growth Rate using EBITDA data.

SMS Alternatives's EBITDA per Share for the three months ended in Jun. 2020 was $-0.24. Its EBITDA per share for the trailing twelve months (TTM) ended in Jun. 2020 was $-0.66.

Please click Growth Rate Calculation Example (GuruFocus) to see how GuruFocus calculates Wal-Mart Stores Inc (WMT)'s revenue growth rate. You can apply the same method to get the EBITDA per share growth rate using EBITDA per Share data.


SMS Alternatives EBITDA Historical Data

The historical data trend for SMS Alternatives's EBITDA can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

SMS Alternatives EBITDA Chart

SMS Alternatives Annual Data
Trend Dec10 Dec11 Dec12 Dec13 Dec14 Dec15 Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
EBITDA
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -2.41 -3.45 -1.74 -1.73 -1.35

SMS Alternatives Quarterly Data
Sep15 Dec15 Mar16 Jun16 Sep16 Dec16 Mar17 Jun17 Sep17 Dec17 Mar18 Jun18 Sep18 Dec18 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Mar20 Jun20
EBITDA Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -0.53 0.13 -0.50 -0.51 -0.50

Competitive Comparison of SMS Alternatives's EBITDA

For the Software - Application subindustry, SMS Alternatives's EV-to-EBITDA, along with its competitors' market caps and EV-to-EBITDA data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


SMS Alternatives's EV-to-EBITDA Distribution in the Software Industry

For the Software industry and Technology sector, SMS Alternatives's EV-to-EBITDA distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where SMS Alternatives's EV-to-EBITDA falls into.


Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) is what the company earns before it expenses interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.

SMS Alternatives's EBITDA for the fiscal year that ended in Dec. 2019 is calculated as

SMS Alternatives's EBITDA was directly provided by GuruFocus' data source Morningstar. For the fiscal year ended in Dec. 2019, SMS Alternatives's EBITDA was $-1.35 Mil.

SMS Alternatives's EBITDA for the quarter that ended in Jun. 2020 is calculated as

SMS Alternatives's EBITDA was directly provided by GuruFocus' data source Morningstar. For the quarter ended in Jun. 2020, SMS Alternatives's EBITDA was $-0.50 Mil.

EBITDA for the trailing twelve months (TTM) ended in Jun. 2020 adds up the quarterly data reported by the company within the most recent 12 months, which was $-1.37 Mil.

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Sometimes companies may have already deducted Depreciation and Amortization from Gross Profit. In this case Depreciation and Amortization needs to be added back when calculating EBITDA.

SMS Alternatives  (OTCPK:CICN) EBITDA Explanation

EBITDA is a cash flow measure that ignores changes in working capital. EBITDA minus Depreciation, and Amortization (DA) equals Operating Income. Operating Income is profit before interest and taxes. Of course, Interest and taxes need to be paid.

While depreciation and amortization expenses do not need to be paid in cash, assets - especially tangible assets - do need to be replaced over time. EBITDA is not a measure of profit in any sense. EBITDA is a measure of cash generation by a business where the uses of that cash may be more or less discretionary depending on the nature of the business.

The EBITDA of a TV station is largely discretionary. Owners may use much of the EBITDA generated by a TV station as they see fit. The EBITDA of a railroad is largely non-discretionary. Owners must use much of the EBITDA generated by a railroad to replace the physical assets of the railroad or the business will literally fall apart over time.

EBITDA can be thought of as the cash a business generates that is available to:

Add more inventory
Add more receivables
Replace property, plant, and equipment
Add more property, plant, and equipment
Pay interest
Pay taxes
And finally: pay owners

EBITDA is widely used in financial analysis because Depreciation and Amortization are not present day cash expenses.. Depreciation and amortization are the spreading out of the costs of assets over the time in which those assets provide benefits. Today's depreciation and amortization expenses relate to assets bought in the past. The assets being expensed may or may not need to be replaced in the future. And the cost to replace the assets may be more or less than it was in the past. For this reason, the depreciation and amortization expenses a company records in the present year may have no relationship to the actual cash costs needed to maintain its assets in future years.

A company's depreciation expense depends on both its expectations about the assets it owns and its choice of accounting methods. Two companies owning identical assets may have different depreciation expenses because they have different expectations about the useful lives of those assets and because they make different accounting choices.

Analysts use EBITDA to remove this element of personal choice from a company's accounting statements. The use of EBITDA is an attempt to make the results of different companies more comparable and uniform.


Be Aware

Although depreciation is not a cash cost it is a real business cost because the company has to pay for the fixed assets when they purchase them. Both Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger hate the idea of EBITDA because in this calculation, depreciation is not counted as an expense.

EBITDA over Revenue is a good metric for comparing the operating efficiencies between companies because EBITDA is less vulnerable to companies' accounting choices. For this reason, EBITDA is used in ranking the Predictability of Companies. Also Price-to-EBITDA is sometimes used in valuations.


SMS Alternatives EBITDA Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of SMS Alternatives's EBITDA provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


SMS Alternatives (SMS Alternatives) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 542, Cary, NC, USA, 27518
SMS Alternatives Inc formerly Cicero Inc provides desktop activity intelligence and improvement software that helps organizations isolate issues and automates employee tasks in the contact center and back office. It provides a combination of application and process integration, automation and desktop analytics capabilities, technical support, training and consulting services. Geographically, it operates in the United States, and Europe. The company generates revenue from three categories: software, maintenance, and services; out of which a vast majority is earned from Software within the United States.
Executives
Mark Landis director 251 CRANDON BLVD. KEY BISCAYNE FL 33149
John Steffens director, 10 percent owner C/O DIGITALBRIDGE GROUP, INC., 750 PARK OF COMMERCE DRIVE SUITE 210, BOCCA RATON FL 33487
Don Peppers director 1111 SUMMER STREET STAMFORD CT 06905
Privet Fund Lp 10 percent owner 3280 PEACHTREE ROAD NE, SUITE 2670, Atlanta GA 30305
Privet Fund Management Llc 10 percent owner 3280 PEACHTREE ROAD NE, SUITE 2670, ATLANTA GA 30305
Ryan Levenson director, 10 percent owner 2396 DELLWOOD DRIVE, ATLANTA GA 30305
Thomas Aiken Avery director 465 LAUREL CHASE COURT, ATLANTA GA 30327
Bruce D Miller director 42 NONANTUM AVE NANTUCKETT MA 02584
Jonathan Gallen 10 percent owner 450 PARK AVENUE, 28TH FLOOR, NEW YORK NY 10022
John P Broderick director, officer: CEO/CFO 214 CARNERE CENTER SUITE 303 PRINCETON NJ 08540
Antony J Castagno director, officer: CTO 11775 MOUNTAIN PARK ROAD ROSWELL GA 30075
Jay Kingley director 20 THISTLE LANE WARREN NJ 07059
Charles B Porciello director 2635 BUCKINGHAM RD ELLICOTT CITY MD 21043
Bruce W Hasenyager director 1400 EARLSHIRE PLACE PLANO TX 75075
Atherton John W Jr director

SMS Alternatives (SMS Alternatives) Headlines

No Headlines