Free 7-day Trial
All Articles and Columns »

TVs, Tablets, and Solar - No Thanks...

January 18, 2012 | About:
The Science of Hitting

The Science of Hitting

215 followers
When I first started investing a couple of years ago, the hot area to invest in (no pun intended) was the solar industry. While I can only recall a couple of names that were frequently touted at the time (Evergreen Solar, Ascent Solar Technologies, Suntech Power, First Solar, etc.), I can tell you that their returns have been utterly abysmal (my portfolio was a testament to that). In the past five years, First Solar (FSLR) is the only one to put up strong returns (46% cumulatively); Evergreen, Ascent (ASTI), and Suntech (STP) have lost 96%, 68%, and 89% since 2007, respectively.

On the other end of the spectrum, how would a market guru approach this situation? In a Fox Business interview from a couple years ago featuring Warren Buffett, Charlie Munger and Bill Gates (link here), I heard an interesting comment that struck home with me; when asked whether he would be looking at companies in the area of “harnessing the sun, wind and sea” in their early stage of development, Charlie Munger had this to say: “Well, the companies don’t interest me very much, but the field interests me enormously.”

In Warren Buffett’s 2009 letter to shareholders, he expounded on this point, saying:

“Charlie and I avoid businesses whose futures we can’t evaluate, no matter how exciting their products may be. In the past, it required no brilliance for people to foresee the fabulous growth that awaited such industries as autos (in 1910), aircraft (in 1930) and television sets (in 1950).

But the future then also included competitive dynamics that would decimate almost all of the companies entering those industries. Even the survivors tended to come away bleeding.

Just because Charlie and I can clearly see dramatic growth ahead for an industry does not mean we can judge what its profit margins and returns on capital will be as a host of competitors battle for supremacy.”

Add solar energy to that list, along with cloud computing, tablets, smart TVs, and others; while these technologies will certainly change the way we live and likely have a bright future ahead, that doesn’t mean they should necessarily become a focal point of your investment strategy. As Warren and Munger have said for years, stick to companies with sustainable competitive advantages, and load up on them when they’re out of favor; it might not be as exciting as the cloud, but better long-term returns is a trade-off that most investors would probably be willing to make.

About the author:

The Science of Hitting
I'm a value investor, with a focus on patience; I look to buy great companies that are suffering from short term issues, and hope to load up when these opportunities present themselves. As this would suggest, I run a fairly concentrated portfolio by most standards, usually with 8-10 names; from the perspective of a businessman rather than a market participant / stock trader, I believe this is more than sufficient diversification.

I hope to own a collection of great businesses; to ever sell one, I would demand a substantial premium to the average market valuation due to what I believe are the understated benefits to the long term investor of superior fundamentals and time on intrinsic value. I don't have a target when I purchase a stock; my goal is to replicate the underlying returns of the business in question - which if I've done my job properly, should be very attractive over many years.

Rating: 4.4/5 (34 votes)

Comments

Please leave your comment:


Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
Free 7-day Trial
FEEDBACK
Hide