Model Portfolios
Bookmark of this page has been deleted.
Can we invest based on the
gurus' latest
stock picks and
holdings? What kind of returns can we expect if we invest based on the
consensus picks of gurus or the
bargain candidates and the stocks many of them hold? What kind of returns can we expect if we buy
the top-ranked stocks?
In order to find out the answers to these questions, we have constructed a few model portfolios based on different criteria. Click on the charts to find out the details and holdings for each of them.
Please understand that these performances are hypothetical and not in any way are guarenteed or certain. Investing is subject to risk and past performance is no guarentee of future results.
Guru Strategies:
All numbers do not include dividends. Annualized_*YR is the average annualized total return over certain years. The Since Inception return is the cumulative return since inception date.
| Year | S&P 500 | Most Broadly Held Portfolio |
Most Weighted Portfolio |
Consensus Picks Portfolio |
Guru Bargains Portfolio |
|---|
| 2006 | 13.62 |
15.18% |
21.39% |
5.83% |
-7.64% |
| 2007 | 4.24 |
-5.47% |
-1.67% |
9.75% |
16.18% |
| 2008 | -38.91 |
-29.98% |
-34.17% |
-45.7% |
-49.14% |
| 2009 | 24.71 |
30.7% |
41.53% |
48.06% |
34.41% |
| 2010 | 11.65 |
14.63% |
15.36% |
6.03% |
15.35% |
| 2011 | -0 |
0.54% |
-15.76% |
-8.01% |
-23.79% |
| 2012 | 11.52 |
16.99% |
2.83% |
13.65% |
18.56% |
| 2013 | 31.8 |
30.85% |
38.37% |
58.33% |
47.65% |
| 2014 | 11.39 |
12.3% |
13.77% |
-1.86% |
-3.38% |
| 2015 | -0.73 |
6.07% |
-3.32% |
-3.22% |
-34.13% |
| 2016 | 9.54 |
9.3% |
7.91% |
2.81% |
25.8% |
| 2017 | 19.42 |
23.8% |
16.94% |
20.92% |
21.16% |
| 2018 | -6.24 |
-4.55% |
-8.51% |
-25.23% |
-20.86% |
| 2019 | 28.88 |
44.05% |
44.7% |
39.8% |
27.01% |
| 2020 | 16.26 |
24.9% |
23.62% |
14.86% |
72.89% |
| 2021 | 26.89 |
27.55% |
26.81% |
33.08% |
-1.68% |
| 2022 | -19.44 |
-26.34% |
-30.66% |
-21.9% |
-54.59% |
| 2023 | 9.53 |
15.65% |
15.25% |
9.4% |
13.09% |
| Annualized_1YR | 1.13 |
2.05% |
-4.63% |
1.02% |
-16.45% |
| Annualized_3YR | 11.36 |
11.57% |
10.42% |
16.02% |
-8.48% |
| Annualized_5YR | 9.07 |
13.08% |
10.35% |
6.81% |
-1.95% |
| Annualized_10YR | 9.93 |
12.83% |
10.16% |
6.99% |
0.07% |
| Annualized_15YR | 7.6 |
11.59% |
7.52% |
5.58% |
-0.34% |
| Since_Inception | |
428.72% |
253.91% |
164.2% |
-3.91% |
| Screener Links | Screener Here | Screener Here | Screener Here | Screener Here |
|---|
GF Score Strategies:
All numbers do not include dividends. Annualized_*YR is the average annualized total return over certain years. The Since Inception return is the cumulative return since inception date.
Value Strategies:
All numbers do not include dividends. Annualized_*YR is the average annualized total return over certain years. The Since Inception return is the cumulative return since inception date.
Value Strategies:
All numbers do not include dividends. Annualized_*YR is the average annualized total return over certain years. The Since Inception return is the cumulative return since inception date.
| Year | S&P 500 | Top 25 Undervalued Predictable Companies |
Top 25 Overvalued Predictable Companies |
|---|
| 2009 | 24.71 |
55.72% |
|
| 2010 | 11.65 |
20.17% |
|
| 2011 | -0 |
-3.32% |
2.11% |
| 2012 | 11.52 |
5.29% |
10.71% |
| 2013 | 31.8 |
24.81% |
29.42% |
| 2014 | 11.39 |
11.38% |
10.46% |
| 2015 | -0.73 |
-0.17% |
3.3% |
| 2016 | 9.54 |
21.08% |
6% |
| 2017 | 19.42 |
12.99% |
26.54% |
| 2018 | -6.24 |
-6.07% |
-3.27% |
| 2019 | 28.88 |
23.82% |
28.77% |
| 2020 | 16.26 |
-2.57% |
24.29% |
| 2021 | 26.89 |
38.94% |
20.26% |
| 2022 | -19.44 |
-8.45% |
-24.65% |
| 2023 | 9.53 |
-7.9% |
7.97% |
| Annualized_1YR | 1.13 |
-15.36% |
4.87% |
| Annualized_3YR | 11.36 |
9.66% |
7.63% |
| Annualized_5YR | 9.07 |
5.28% |
7.07% |
| Annualized_10YR | 9.93 |
8.33% |
10.39% |
| Annualized_15YR | 7.6 |
|
|
| Since_Inception | |
380.17% |
239.23% |
| Screener Links | Screener Here | Screener Here |
|---|
Value Strategies:
All numbers do not include dividends. Annualized_*YR is the average annualized total return over certain years. The Since Inception return is the cumulative return since inception date.
Top 25 stocks from the Buffett-Munger Screener, 1. These companies are undervalued based pe/g ratio. The portfolio consists of the top 25 most undervalued on the day of rebalance. GuruFocus Founder Dr. Charlie Tian has a large portion of his investments in this portfolio.
Top 25 Undervalued Predictable Companies screened from here. These companies have the best predictabilities, and their stock prices are undervalued as measured by discounted cash flow model or discounted earning model.
Top 25 Overvalued Predictable Companies. These companies have predictable business, but are over valued as measured by DCF model. The purpose of this portfolio is to show that over-valued stocks appreciate less than the undervalued ones.
For details, see New Model Portfolios: Overvalued Stocks
Top 25 Historical Low P/S Ratio Companies. These companies have been very predictable in their business operations. And the price/sales (P/S) ratio of each of these companies is less than 50% above its historical low. The companies in this model portfolio are traded in NAS and NYSE, and each has a market cap over one billion at the time of rebalance. The current list of stocks that meet this criteria can be found here.
Top 25 Historical Low P/B Ratio Companies. These companies have been very predictable in their business operations. And the price/book (P/B) ratio of each of these companies is less than 50% above its historical low. The companies in this model portfolio are traded in NAS and NYSE, and each has a market cap over one billion at the time of rebalance. The current list of stocks that meet this criteria can be found here.
Top 25 52-week Low Predictable Companies. These companies have been very predictable in their business operations. The companies in this model portfolio are traded in NAS and NYSE, and each is traded near its 52-week low price point. The current list of stocks that meet this criteria can be found here.
These are the most broadly held 25 stocks in Gurus' holdings. The rank is based on the number of the gurus who hold the stock. All other things being equal, the stocks that the gurus hold in higher concentrations (percentage of portfolio) are ranked higher. The portfolio is updated every 12 months. The current list of stocks that meet this criteria can be found here
These are the 25 stocks with the most heavily weighted positions among the combined holdings of the Gurus. The rank is based on the combined positions of the stocks in the Gurus holdings. For instance: if Guru A holds 17% of WMT in his holding, and Guru B holds 5%, and Guru C holds 4%,the combined weighting is defined as 17+5+4=26. The portfolio is updated every 12 months. The current list of stocks that meet this criteria can be found here
These are the top 25 consensus picks of the Gurus during the most recent quarter. The rank is based on the number of the gurus who bought the stock. All other things being equal, the stocks that the gurus bought in higher concentrations (percentage of portfolio) are ranked higher. The portfolio is updated every 12 months. The current list of stocks that meet this criteria can be found here
Guru Bargains Portfolio: top 25 bargains on the day of portfolio update
Top 25 portfolio from Guru Bargains at the time of rebalance. The current list of stocks that meet this criteria can be found here
Top 25 CEO Buys
Top 25 CFO Buys
Top 25 Insider Cluster Buys
Top 25 CEO Sales
Top 25 CFO Sales
Top 25 Insider Cluster Sales
Buffett-Munger Screener top 25, Chinese/Hongkong Stocks
Buffett-Munger Screener top 25, Stocks Traded in Europe
Buffett-Munger Screener top 25, Stocks Traded in Canada
Top 20 High Quality & Low CAPEX US companies screened from here. These companies are of high quality and belong to low Capex industries.
Top 25 High Quality & Low CAPEX Chinese companies screened from here. These companies are of high quality and belong to low Capex industries.
These are the GF Score <= 60 Top 25 Companies, which have bad future performance potential. The companies in this model portfolio are non-OTC stocks traded in US, and each has GF score between 51 and 60. The current list of stocks that meet this criteria can be found here.
These are the GF Score <= 70 Top 25 Companies, which have the poor future performance potential. The companies in this model portfolio are non-OTC stocks traded in US, and each has GF score between 61 and 70. The current list of stocks that meet this criteria can be found here.
These are the GF Score <= 80 Top 25 Companies, which have average future performance potential. The companies in this model portfolio are non-OTC stocks traded in US, and each has GF score between 71 and 80. The current list of stocks that meet this criteria can be found here.
These are the GF Score <= 90 Top 25 Companies, which have good future performance potential Companies. The companies in this model portfolio are non-OTC stocks traded in US, and each has GF score between 81 and 90. The current list of stocks that meet this criteria can be found here.
These are the GF Score <= 100 Top 25 Companies, which have the highest future outperformance potential. The companies in this model portfolio are non-OTC stocks traded in US, and each has GF score between 91 and 100. The current list of stocks that meet this criteria can be found here here.For questions about how the Model Portfolios were constructed, please see the articles listed on the left side of the menu.
Create New Portfolio
Portfolio Contest
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Bookmark
Print
This page was added to your