GuruFocus Premium Membership

Serving Intelligent Investors since 2004. Only 96 cents a day.

Free Trial

Free 7-day Trial
All Articles and Columns »

Long-Term Orientation as a Competitive Advantage

October 14, 2012 | About:
Micah Martin

Micah Martin

10 followers
It’s a classic tale.

An individual from one culture walks into another culture and experiences culture shock. It permeates stories — a country boy going to the big city, a city girl going to the country, a rich individual trading places with a poor one. It’s not difficult to think of other examples.

The reason I mention these is because I have recently had that experience — a clash of cultures — and the clash illustrates a fundamental differentiator of value investing. In order to make my point, I’m going to give you a brief background of where I’m coming from. My goal is not to talk about me, but to emphasize a critical point about what makes us (as value investors) so different from the crowd (i.e. the financial world at large).

I have been involved with investing for a much shorter time than probably most GuruFocus readers. I first read Graham’s "The Intelligent Investor" in August 2010, making me a student of value investing for slightly over two years now. When I first read "The Intelligent Investor," I was working in China at a job that was a stark contrast to the world of finance, but Graham’s book fundamentally changed how I viewed business, investing and the stock market. Graham made so much sense, and he lit a fire inside of me to learn more!

I read "The Intelligent Investor" again that same month and then began reading as much as I could about value investing, Benjamin Graham, Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger. I read Buffett’s shareholder letters, "Security Analysis," "The Snowball," Lowenstein’s "Buffett," books by Peter Lynch, articles and interviews here on GuruFocus, and whatever else I could get my hands on. This led me to begin investing on my own, as well as studying 10-Ks and 10-Qs, learning about companies, performing crude valuations, examining margins of safety and simply learning as much as I could as fast as I could.

The key takeaway of this “mini-bio” is that value investing was my “home culture” and “home language.” It was everything I knew. I did not know one person in the investment industry. I had never been to New York City, London or Hong Kong. I had never read a finance textbook (other than Graham’s "Security Analysis") or taken any sort of finance, accounting or general business class. My teachers, literally, were Benjamin Graham and Warren Buffett, and I viewed the investing world only through the lens they provided.

When I realized that my career passion was truly for value investing, I decided to come back to the U.S. to enroll in a quality MBA program and learn about business. I knew that an MBA alone would not qualify me for a value investing job, but I did know that I needed to learn as much as I could about competitive advantages, what the best businesses look like, marketing, operations, economics, accounting, etc.

So, I began my MBA program in mid-August (thus the dearth of articles from me lately). The past two months have been busy, but I love being here and learning; my understanding of what makes businesses work has grown significantly over the last few weeks. I have also been learning about the investment management industry through guest speakers on campus, reading the Wall Street Journal, talking to finance professionals, talking with classmates and in general being surrounded by people that make investment decisions.

Now, to the point of my article:

When going from my “home culture” of the Graham/Buffett philosophy into the “foreign culture” of finance/Wall Street, the primary shock to my system was the difference between the long-term orientation of Graham/Buffett and the short-term orientation of the general investment culture.

To many of you, keeping a "long-term orientation" is probably a no-brainer, but it is hugely important to realize consciously and remember. Every day there is an increasingly tremendous pressure from the greater investing culture to focus on the short term, with powerful incentives to do well and not underperform this quarter or year. I think I feel the strength of that pressure more than most because it stands in stark contrast to the long-term philosophy of Graham and Buffett, which is all that I knew before returning to the U.S.

Constantly keeping a long-term mindset is one of the key, fundamental advantages that we as value investors have. Yes, understanding businesses, finance, accounting, etc., are all important, but there happen to be thousands of finance professionals (our competition) who also know the basics of business. My competitive advantage does not lie there. Were I to compete against the dozens of highly intelligent analysts covering an IBM or PepsiCo, and try to predict a more accurate quarterly earnings number, the odds simply are not in my favor.

Why would I compete with the computers, traders and analysts hoping to get a short-term edge? To me, that seems a game with near-impossible odds. Sure, I could maybe have some success, but to me that is not a reliable foundation for long-term success as a professional investor.

(Know that I am not saying studying companies and looking at or making predictions for the next quarter is meaningless. There is definitely some value there. What I am saying is if that is your primary focus, it’s much more difficult to have a competitive advantage over the multitude of your other short-term competitors.)

Since entering the “greater investing culture,” I have realized that my competitive advantage lies, ultimately, in being patient and thinking long term. I must study companies thoroughly, wait for them to become cheap enough to buy with a margin of safety, and then wait for them to reach their intrinsic value after I buy them.

There are other areas where an investor can obtain a competitive advantage as well. A couple of weeks ago I was talking to a research analyst at Diamond Hill Capital Management (a value investing firm followed by GuruFocus), and he mentioned to me that another analyst at Diamond Hill had told him there are three advantages one can utilize to beat the market. Those are:

1. Information arbitrage (knowing more than others, especially with perhaps small-cap stocks that are not widely followed)

2. Time advantage (thinking long term versus short term)

3. Psychological advantage (buying out-of-favor stocks when fundamentals have not changed)

Time is explicitly mentioned in No. 2, but thinking long term and being patient is important to the other two advantages as well.

So, what does all this mean for my personal investing strategy?

I have no short-term pressure on me as I merely manage my personal portfolio, so it’s easy for me to remain long-term oriented and focus on a) large, quality companies that are out of favor due to temporary problems, and b) small-cap stocks of quality companies with minimal analyst coverage. I look for a margin of safety in price of my purchases, trade sparingly, focus every day on being patient and don’t buy a company I wouldn’t hold for years. Every single company in my portfolio met these criteria when I purchased them. Thus far they have all done well, but the true test is not how well they have done up till now, but how well they will do over the next five to ten years.

This week, as earnings cause widespread consternation or widespread joy, focus on the long term, not the short term. That’s what my teachers Graham and Buffett would advise.

Rating: 3.6/5 (28 votes)

Comments

Valuelion
Valuelion - 1 year ago
When I talk to people about investing I tell them there are 3 ways to achieve consistent excess returns.

1. Have better information (than the market)

2. Have better Analysis/ Insight (than the market)

3. Take excess risk

marior
Marior - 1 year ago
Good read! I think you might enjoy this:

"If everything you do needs to work on a three-year time horizon, then you’re competing against a lot of people. But if you’re willing to invest on a seven-year time horizon, you’re now competing against a fraction of those people… Just by lengthening the time horizon, you can engage in endeavors that you could never otherwise pursue." - Jeff Bezos
Micah Martin
Micah Martin - 1 year ago
@Valuelion: Thanks for your comment and for adding "excess risk" as a way to achieve excess returns. I neglected to mention that in my article, but I'm glad you pointed that out.

@Marior: Thanks for that quote! It's a great one, and fits perfectly with my article and what I've been thinking about lately.
playmaker23
Playmaker23 - 1 year ago


Hi Micah,

thank you fro the article , it is really interesting and smart.I have to say I find a little of myself in your study(I live in Italy, I'm a business engineer and work in a different field-electronics multinational-, I read The Int. Investor in 2010 and since then I started read hundreds of books and articles about value investing and I'm really passioante about it, maybe the only one in my country).Now I manage my portfolio with a long term-huge business moat and cheap - approach,So my question is :I'm really interested in a mba for my future(I've been in NY on August at NYU and Columbia), but I'm wondering: is it a good investment for me to spend 200 k $ with debt and learn more about investing in a mba or it is better to use my small money to invest them, compounding and just focus on long term?In other words is mba a good investments for a value investor passionate?You are in my same shoes so maybe you can help.Thanks so much.

Best

Alberto
Micah Martin
Micah Martin - 1 year ago
Alberto,

Thanks for your article and the nice comments!

Your question is a good one to be considering. A lot of people go into an MBA program just because they think it’s a good thing to do, without necessarily knowing why they are doing it. Unfortunately, there is no clear-cut answer. You can do the math and try to calculate what has the greater ROI, but it’s hard to get an apples to apples comparison and the numbers 20 years out are really fuzzy. For some people, an MBA is worth it, but definitely not everyone.

I can’t speak for Columbia or NYU, but I’ll give you the general rationale behind my decision to get an MBA, and hopefully it helps a little bit.

The key reasons I am getting an MBA are:

1. It’s a way to get my foot in the door of the finance world. Can you get in the door without an MBA? Of course you can. I think it would be harder, though. Because I am getting an MBA, I have been able to meet and talk with people I would not have been able to meet with otherwise. I have already learned a ton from those meetings. An MBA helps show that you are serious.

2. Getting an MBA does not make me a business expert, but it is a good way to get a broad understanding of business, especially because I didn’t have a business background (I was a music major as an undergraduate ) Buying a stock is buying a piece of a business, so I believe it is critical to understand how businesses work, etc.

3. Being surrounded by intelligent, competent people sharpens my mind and how I think. By staying home, it’s easier to not think about things from different perspectives and views. In an economics class with classmates from all over the world and different walks of life, you hear different ideas and perspectives, which is valuable.

Some other thoughts:

-In general, if you are just looking for value investing techniques- studying a company, determining a range of intrinsic value, calculating a margin of safety, and making investment decisions- an MBA is not the best tool. It’s a lot of work and a lot of money to get an MBA just to become technically a better value investor.

-I really dislike debt, so I avoided programs that would put me in a lot of debt and force me to get a job I don’t want out of the program. Financial aid was critical for me, so I chose a school that offered me a very strong financial aid/scholarship package, while also being a top-25 school in a good location with a low cost of living.

-If you had to choose only one- CFA or MBA-, and from the opinion of an individual who is merely working towards both, a CFA is more respected in the investment community. Of course, you can pass the tests but you have to find a place to work for a few years before getting the CFA.

-The finance they teach you in most MBA programs is definitely not Graham/Dodd (with the exception of Columbia, at least as far as I know). It’s largely efficient markets, CAPM, etc., and not really the techniques that Graham/Dodd/Buffett value investors use.

In short, an MBA can help you on your path to becoming a better value investor, but only you can truly judge whether the benefits outweigh the costs. The benefits outweighed the costs for me, and I am pleased with my decision thus far!

Hope this helps. If you would like to talk more, feel free to message me here on Gurufocus and I would be happy to answer any more of your questions.

-Micah

Please leave your comment:


Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
Free 7-day Trial
FEEDBACK
Email Hide