Research Frontiers has been listed on the Nasdaq for around two decades, successfully enticing investors and raising capital by creating an alluring story which has no substance. Similar to the sailors who were lured to their destruction by the sweet voices of the mythical Greek sirens, even experienced investors have fallen prey to the seductive snare of this story stock. When an individual purchases shares in such a company, he has crossed the line from investment to speculation: Often times the departure occurs unwittingly. Avoiding such equities is paramount to an investor’s long-term returns.
The subject of today's article is a discussion of Research Frontiers and some fundamental techniques which enable an investor to quickly discern a story stock from a sound investment.
Characteristics of a Story Stock
Story stocks typified by a definable set of characteristics:
1) They are not shareholder friendly.
2) Executive compensation is excessive (as revealed in the proxy statement).
3) Revenues are low (as displayed in the income statement).
4) They have large accumulated deficits (listed in the equity portion of the balance sheet).
5) They are funded by perpetual shelf filings which increase their share count and their additional paid-in capital in the equity portion of the balance sheet.
6) They habitually burn cash (as demonstrated in the cash flow statement under cash flow from operations).
Story stocks exist for a single reason: They provide their management (and sometimes their board) with a very productive livelihood while providing their shareholders with little in return.
The following statement by long-time REFR shareholder (who recently petitioned the board of directors unsuccessfully to include him as a director) appeared on their annual proxy statement:
Statement by Darryl Daigle
I have been a shareholder of Research Frontiers for more than 21 years and currently own a substantial equity position in the Company which, according to the most recently published ownership records, makes me the largest individual shareholder outside of management and the independent directors of the Company.
As a shareholder I have been independently active among the Research Frontiers shareholder community, have performed extensive independent due diligence on the Company and its licensees, and have supported the Company and its shareholders for the past two decades.
I believe that, based on the Company’s current ownership, which predominantly consists of retail shareholders, that our retail shareholders need stronger representation on the Board of Directors. I believe that it is important for board members to have a meaningful personal economic stake in the business and success of the companies on whose boards they serve. I have purchased the stock that I own, both in the open market, and directly from the Company, using my own personal resources. I made this investment because I believe that Research Frontiers’ SPD technology has the potential to make revolutionary changes in the way that automobiles, aircraft, and architectural applications will be designed and used. I believe that the prospects for the Company are quite positive, but believe that more can be done to build shareholder value to reflect the Company’s bright prospects. I hope to use my more than 25 years experience as a successful business owner, and two decades experience as an investor in Research Frontiers, to provide retail shareholders with an effective and independent voice on the Board of Directors of the Company.
Not surprisingly, Mr. Daigle’s request drew the following response on the same proxy statement:
The Company’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that its current Board of Directors has the necessary skill and experience to lead the Company during its current phase of operations, and recommends that stockholders vote FOR the three Board Nominees (Gregory G. Grimes, Joseph M. Harary, Richard Hermon-Taylor) to serve as Class I directors and WITHHOLD AUTHORITY to vote for Darryl Daigle to serve as a Class I director.
Excessive Executive Compensation
The proxy statement of REFR profiles the compensation for its CEO, Joseph M. Harary, for the last three years:
Name and Principal Position
Joseph M. Harary
President, Chief Executive
Mr. Harary has drawn an average annual compensation of over $900,000 to manage a company with 13 employees and average revenues of less than $1 million a year.
Research Frontiers has only recorded $1 million in revenues once in past 10 years. In other words, the total compensation of its CEO is greater that the entire sum of their yearly revenues in most years.
INCOME STATEMENT: 10-YEAR SUMMARY
Large Accumulated Deficits on the Balance Sheet
Successful companies demonstrate increasing retained earnings in the equity portion of their balance sheet; contrarily, story stocks like REFR show progressively increasing accumulated deficits. A check of past balance sheets reveals that REFR has increased its accumulated deficits from $46.15 million at year-end 2002 to $86.87 million as of the last reported quarter.
“Nothing is certain in life but death and taxes,” according to the old saying; I think we can add, “Resource Frontiers will lose money this year” to that age-old truism.
Serial Shelf Offerings and Additional Paid-In Capital
Despite its perpetual cash burn, Research Frontiers has been extremely adept at raising capital through repeated shelf offerings. A check of the companies’ additional paid-in capital reveals that the company has raised over $44 dollars in equity approximately the last 10 years.
P.T. Barnum had a legitimate point when he noted that “a sucker is born every minute.”
Perpetual Cash Burn
No one can accuse Research Frontiers of cooking its books. It is totally unabashed when it comes to reporting its steady cash drain. Its perpetual losses in net income are matched almost perfectly by its losses in cash flows from operations. Further, it requires almost no capital expenditures to accelerate its cash burn. Thus its accumulated deficits are nearly a perfect match for its negative free cash flow.
Let the Buyer Beware
I have been having some fun with Research Frontiers, but I find it unlikely that the current shareholders find any amusement in my discussion of the company. REFR is exactly the type of company which leads novice investors to proclaim that the market is little more than a “crapshoot.” That type of attitude invariably leads to the practice of speculation, rapid trading of stocks and ultimate losses, in the interest of safety. Investors who lose money through poor stock selection generally come to the conclusion that their error lay in “holding the equity too long” rather than in the purchase itself.
In reality, investors can easily avoid story stocks which rely upon hype rather than financial performance to attract supporters. A few simple checks of the financial statement of REFR clearly reveal that the company has little in the way of substance — that has been the case for two decades, yet the company is able to continue to complete successful shelf offerings. The most recent capital raising was completed last autumn, and it insured that the management will continue to draw its exorbitant wages for at least a few more years.
In conclusion, the best way investors can protect themselves from poor investments is to hold a healthy amount of skepticism when dealing with companies who proclaim that they have revolutionary products on the horizon. Past financial statements frequently tell a much better story than the pretty picture that is painted by an unscrupulous management team which relies upon selling additional stock to fund their livelihood. So always remember caveat emptor when a story sounds too good to be true.