GuruFocus Premium Membership

Serving Intelligent Investors since 2004. Only 96 cents a day.

Free Trial

Free 7-day Trial
All Articles and Columns »

Why Gold Is a Better Choice Than The S&P 500 - Marc Faber

March 08, 2014
Canadian Value

Canadian Value

110 followers

Sprott Global: Marc, you live in Asia. What’s happening on the ground there and what does that mean for gold and natural resources?

Marc Faber: Well, that’s a very good question because we have an economic slowdown in emerging economies that is very pronounced.

I think some emerging economies may besubmergingsoon, and have significant economic problems. The question arises, “Will they continue to buy gold?” Say if there was a recession in China -- a downturn -- would people buy gold?

I think if the Chinese economy imploded, it is likely that the currency, the Yuan, would begin to weaken. Or the government would devalue the Yuan.

If that were the case, then I think that Chinese investors would shift some of their money into gold rather than keep their funds in the local currency.

So I think that a problem in Asia -- and geopolitical problems in Asia and in other regions of the world -- may lead to higher rather than lower gold demand.

Marc, what are your thoughts on the regional Asian conflicts going forward and how might that impact natural resources?

My view is this: we wouldn’t have a conflict in Asia if not for the intervention by the U.S. The U.S. has a security pact with Japan and has military bases and naval basis all over Asia.

The Chinese economy is highly vulnerable to interruptions in the supply of metals and of oil. 47% of global metals consumption is from China2. It’s up from 4% in 1990 and 10% in the year 2000. So they have become a huge factor.

For their industrial production, they need resources; they need iron ore from Australia, copper from Australia and elsewhere, and oil from the Middle East. That’s their only source of oil -- the Middle East --, compared to say the U.S. that can source oil from Canada, from Mexico and who have a rising domestic production.

So the Chinese are very concerned about interruptions of supplies; I think that over time, the Chinese will want to control the East and South China Sea. I do not think that they have any plans for aggression, but the U.S. wouldn’t be particularly happy either if, say, the Chinese or the Russians had military bases in the Caribbean, in Mexico, in Canada and so forth.

The Chinese cannot accept to be encircled by U.S. military bases in Central Asia, South East Asia, and North Asia. I think those tensions will increase over time.

Marc, when we look at gold, it has been sideways to –

It has been down.

Right, over the last three years but when you look at the fundamentals today as compared to 2011, how would you describe the difference?

Well basically, we had a huge run-up in prices starting in 1999, from $255 oz. to $1921 oz. in early September 2011. We’ve been in a correction period since.

Now, I think the correction period was partly justified because there was too much enthusiasm and too much speculation, leading to the peak in September 2011.

But I think that there may have been some market manipulation as well. My sense is that the correction has probably come to an end. If anything, the fundamentals for gold are much better today than they were at the time of the peak, but the price is down.

Every investor understands “buy low and sell high” as a principle, but when prices are low, nobody wants to buy. We had very negative sentiment recently.

Of course, we could one day enter a long-term downtrend after the long period of growth and asset inflation over the last 20 to 30 years.

But when I compare gold to the S&P, the S&P is up substantially since 2011 and gold is down substantially. If you compare the performance of gold shares to the S&P, it has been a disaster for gold shares.

When I look around at asset prices; real estate, bonds, equities, paintings, collectibles, vintage cars, I think the price of gold is actually one of the few assets that are relatively cheap, relatively inexpensive now.

Marc, given your world travel experience, how would you characterize the value of water as a natural resource? What do you think might be some of the opportunities and pitfalls in investing in water, which Rick Rule has found very attractive?

As you know, we still have colossal poverty in the world. Extreme poverty usually occurs in areas where you have no water. Water is very important, it’s a scarce resource. Countries that are endowed with a lot of water, like Canada, or part of the U.S., or some European countries like Switzerland (we have a lot of water), are very fortunate.

Countries that have no water like those in Sub-Saharan Africa are very unfortunate.

So I believe that one should invest in water. I suppose there is a lot of risk; but if you want to aid development, if you want to improve the standard of living of people, water would be a good place to start. I would rather address the water problem – with proper water distribution and irrigation -- than to give these countries vaccines and gifts.

Continue reading: http://sprottglobal.com/thoughts/articles/why-gold-looks-better-than-the-s-p-marc-faber-phd/

About the author:

Canadian Value
http://valueinvestorcanada.blogspot.com/

Rating: 4.0/5 (1 vote)

Comments

xtddd
Xtddd - 5 months ago

gold is bad investments in the long term !

Please leave your comment:


Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
Free 7-day Trial
FEEDBACK