Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany, Mexico

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.12
NYSE:ATW's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
66% of the 67 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.26 vs. NYSE:ATW: 0.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
NYSE:ATW' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.05  Med: 0.22 Max: 5.58
Current: 0.12
0.05
5.58
Equity to Asset 0.71
NYSE:ATW's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
80% of the 65 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.56 vs. NYSE:ATW: 0.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
NYSE:ATW' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.5  Med: 0.68 Max: 0.86
Current: 0.71
0.5
0.86
Interest Coverage 4.29
NYSE:ATW's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
69% of the 36 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 6.75 vs. NYSE:ATW: 4.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NYSE:ATW' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.29  Med: 61 Max: 173.48
Current: 4.29
4.29
173.48
F-Score: 7
Z-Score: 1.79
M-Score: -3.65
WACC vs ROIC
9.42%
5.64%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 9/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 28.83
NYSE:ATW's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
83% of the 66 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -10.25 vs. NYSE:ATW: 28.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
NYSE:ATW' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 28.83  Med: 40.47 Max: 50.95
Current: 28.83
28.83
50.95
Net-margin (%) 25.99
NYSE:ATW's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
91% of the 67 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -18.10 vs. NYSE:ATW: 25.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
NYSE:ATW' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 25.99  Med: 34.53 Max: 42.75
Current: 25.99
25.99
42.75
ROE (%) 8.56
NYSE:ATW's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
82% of the 66 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -9.20 vs. NYSE:ATW: 8.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
NYSE:ATW' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.56  Med: 17.43 Max: 29.52
Current: 8.56
8.56
29.52
ROA (%) 5.61
NYSE:ATW's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
87% of the 70 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -5.21 vs. NYSE:ATW: 5.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
NYSE:ATW' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.61  Med: 11.93 Max: 23.7
Current: 5.61
5.61
23.7
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 8.57
NYSE:ATW's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
81% of the 69 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -4.56 vs. NYSE:ATW: 8.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
NYSE:ATW' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.57  Med: 16.97 Max: 33.16
Current: 8.57
8.57
33.16
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) -0.90
NYSE:ATW's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
62% of the 58 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -10.20 vs. NYSE:ATW: -0.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
NYSE:ATW' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.3  Med: 13.9 Max: 42.5
Current: -0.9
-1.3
42.5
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 0.50
NYSE:ATW's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
57% of the 44 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -6.00 vs. NYSE:ATW: 0.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
NYSE:ATW' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -20.7  Med: 13.1 Max: 64.4
Current: 0.5
-20.7
64.4
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) -8.40
NYSE:ATW's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
59% of the 29 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -2.60 vs. NYSE:ATW: -8.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
NYSE:ATW' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -34.9  Med: 8.1 Max: 152.8
Current: -8.4
-34.9
152.8
» NYSE:ATW's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Oprt. Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q4 2015

ATW Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Prem Watsa 10,600 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 54,600 sh (+3.21%)
Chuck Royce Sold Out
Jeremy Grantham Sold Out
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Arnold Van Den Berg 879,288 sh (-4.50%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 117,059 sh (-4.57%)
David Dreman 260,568 sh (-5.84%)
Jim Simons 167,000 sh (-87.62%)
» More
Q1 2016

ATW Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Chuck Royce 135,909 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 762,574 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 1,037,700 sh (New)
Jeremy Grantham 39,000 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 81,000 sh (+48.35%)
David Dreman 276,976 sh (+6.30%)
Prem Watsa Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss Sold Out
Arnold Van Den Berg 854,388 sh (-2.83%)
» More
Q2 2016

ATW Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 43,672 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 1,182,230 sh (+55.03%)
Arnold Van Den Berg 1,224,528 sh (+43.32%)
Jeremy Grantham 39,000 sh (unchged)
Chuck Royce 135,909 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen Sold Out
David Dreman Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones 16,700 sh (-79.38%)
» More
Q3 2016

ATW Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Paul Tudor Jones 33,400 sh (+100.00%)
Jeremy Grantham 64,166 sh (+64.53%)
Arnold Van Den Berg 1,858,920 sh (+51.81%)
Chuck Royce 135,909 sh (unchged)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 42,726 sh (-2.17%)
Joel Greenblatt 656,675 sh (-44.45%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with ATW

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - Drilling » Oil & Gas Drilling
Compare:NYSE:SBR, OTCPK:GUKYF, NYSE:PES, NAS:ORIG, NYSE:ICD, NYSE:RIGP, OTCPK:ESVIF, OTCPK:FOEAY, NYSE:PACD, NYSE:NADL, OTCPK:FDMQF, OTCPK:ARHVF, AMEX:LEI, OTCPK:PGNPQ, OTCPK:CETEF, OTCPK:GULTU, OTCPK:IDNG, OTCPK:AEGG, OTCPK:HENC, OTCPK:SOIGF » details
Traded in other countries:AWZ.Germany, ATW.Mexico,
Atwood Oceanics Inc is an offshore drilling contractor, engaged in drilling and completion of exploratory and developmental oil and gas wells.

Atwood Oceanics Inc was organized in 1968 as a Texas corporation and commenced operations in 1970. It is headquartered in Houston, Texas with support offices in Australia, Malaysia, Singapore and the United Kingdom. The Company is an offshore drilling contractor, engaged in drilling and completion of exploratory and developmental oil and gas wells. It owns 13 mobile offshore drilling units located in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, the Mediterranean Sea, offshore West Africa, offshore Southeast Asia and offshore Australia, is constructing three ultra-deepwater drillships. Its various types of drilling rigs are Ultra-Deep-water Drill-ships, Semisubmersible Rigs, Semisubmersible Tender Assist Rigs and Jack-up Drilling Rigs. The Ultra-Deepwater Drillships are self-propelled vessels, shaped like conventional ships, and are mobile of the rig types. Semisubmersible rigs have two hulls, the lower of which is capable of being flooded. Semisubmersible tender assist rigs operate similar to semisubmersible rigs except that their drilling equipment is temporarily installed on permanently constructed offshore support platforms. A jack-up drilling rig consists of a single hull supported by at least three legs positioned on the sea floor. It is typically towed to the well site and once on location, its legs are lowered to the sea floor and the unit is raised out of the water by jacking the hull up the legs. It competes with several international offshore drilling contractors. Its competitors include Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc., Ensco plc, Noble Corporation, Rowan Companies plc, Seadrill Limited, and Transocean Ltd. It complies with government regulation in the form of international conventions, federal, state and local laws and regulations in jurisdictions where its vessels operate and are registered. The Company is subject to changing tax laws, treaties and regulations in and between countries in which it operates.

Guru Investment Theses on Atwood Oceanics Inc

Bruce Berkowitz Comments on Atwood - Aug 02, 2016

The Funds own senior bonds of Atwood (NYSE:ATW) due 2020 with a 17% yield to maturity. Year-to-date, Atwood has retired over 30% these bonds due 2020 via open market purchases and a $150 million cash tender offer announced in late June. These events indicate that management believes it has the financial wherewithal to meet all obligations and take advantage of market mispricing. An existing $220 million cash balance, available credit line, and current contractual backlog provide ample liquidity. Atwood’s fleet of 11 high-spec rigs has a superb operating record and management continues to blend and extend transaction dates with both customers and suppliers.




From Bruce Berkowitz (Trades, Portfolio)'s first-half 2016 letter to shareholders.

Check out Bruce Berkowitz latest stock trades

FPA Capital Fund Comments on Atwood - Dec 09, 2015

During the third quarter, we sold our investment in Atwood (NYSE:ATW) and reinvested the proceeds in PTEN. There are many things to like about Atwood, including their young fleet of high-spec rigs, their significant revenue backlog, their industry leading margins and revenue efficiency, their track record of safe operations, and their seasoned board of directors. The problem with Atwood is they have debt maturing in the next three years. While we imagine the cycle may have turned by then, we always look for a margin of safety and have chosen to reinvest this capital into other energy names with more favorable balance sheets is beyond reproach. Unlike land drilling, if a rig runs out of work it costs a lot of money to store (particularly floating rigs). We do not know if the cycle will last beyond the time when the bulk of Atwood’s revenue backlog runs out. The recent credit facility amendment greatly reduced Atwood’s flexibility and puts shareholders in a position where if they guess wrong about when the cycle turns they may lose their entire investment. We were not willing to underwrite that.

By selling the shares of Atwood and reinvesting in Patterson we do give up some revenue backlog, but we pick up another well run dividend paying company at a discount to tangible book value with a much better balance sheet and greater liquidity. Crucially, it costs very little money to store Patterson’s land drilling rigs or pressure pumping equipment in a yard if either are idled. We have confidence that by selling Atwood and investing in Patterson we have reduced our downside risk. Recall that we executed a similar swap in the first quarter of this year, when we replaced our Ensco holding with Helmerich & Payne for the very same reasons: similar upside but significantly greater downside protection.

From FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio)'s third quarter 2015 letter to shareholders.

Check out FPA Capital Fund latest stock trades

FPA Capital Fund Comments on Atwood Oceanics Inc - Feb 19, 2015

Atwood Oceanics (ATW) is an offshore drilling contractor. They have been an industry leader in utilization rates, profit margins, and returns on capital for years, and they have been profitable 19 of the last 20 years. Our thesis for purchasing the stock was that the company had almost completely renewed its fleet over the last few years and signed those rigs to contracts that gave it one of the biggest backlogs in the industry. We are currently modeling in our Base Case that 98/77/36% of the total revenue we expect them to generate in FY2015/16/17 is already under contract. We believed the culture and business practices behind the company’s peer-leading efficiencies would allow them to convert that backlog into substantial profits and initiate a meaningful dividend, which they recently implemented ($1/share per year).

The stock’s negative performance in the fourth quarter is due to a combination of macro and company-specific factors. Macro: Spot prices for Brent Oil fell by nearly 40% during the quarter, as discussed above, and the Philadelphia Oil Service Sector index had a total return of (20.38%). Company-specific: Atwood delayed the delivery of their two uncontracted newbuild drillships by 6 months because they lost out on a customer tender that would have put them to work at decent rates of ~$400k/day. However, even if drillship dayrates fall further to $350k/day the company should still earn $3/share by FY2017 when most of their backlog will have burned off. At the Dec-31 price of $28.37 the stock is trading at less than 10x that figure (and yielding 3.52%), but in the intervening two years the company should earn ~$12 per share, or greater than 40% of the current market cap. The company-specific elements of our thesis are still intact.

From FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio) Q4 2014 Letter.

Check out FPA Capital Fund latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Atwood Oceanics Inc

Atwood: Offshore Oil Company Value With Upside Potential Atwood is a value at its current $9 per share, with the opportunity to double in the next 12 months
Atwood Industries is an offshore oil rig company. It owns 11 offshore drilling units in the U.S., Mediterranean Sea, offshore West Africa, Southeast Asia and Australia. In addition to the 11 rigs in fleet, it has two more ultra-deepwater rigs under construction in South Korea, scheduled for completion on September 2017 and June 2018. Ultra-deepwater rigs generate the most revenue for Atwood (52%) while making up 47% of drilling costs. Read more...
Bruce Berkowitz Comments on Atwood Guru stock highlight
The Funds own senior bonds of Atwood (NYSE:ATW) due 2020 with a 17% yield to maturity. Year-to-date, Atwood has retired over 30% these bonds due 2020 via open market purchases and a $150 million cash tender offer announced in late June. These events indicate that management believes it has the financial wherewithal to meet all obligations and take advantage of market mispricing. An existing $220 million cash balance, available credit line, and current contractual backlog provide ample liquidity. Atwood’s fleet of 11 high-spec rigs has a superb operating record and management continues to blend and extend transaction dates with both customers and suppliers.
Read more...
FPA Capital Fund Comments on Atwood Guru stock highlight
During the third quarter, we sold our investment in Atwood (NYSE:ATW) and reinvested the proceeds in PTEN. There are many things to like about Atwood, including their young fleet of high-spec rigs, their significant revenue backlog, their industry leading margins and revenue efficiency, their track record of safe operations, and their seasoned board of directors. The problem with Atwood is they have debt maturing in the next three years. While we imagine the cycle may have turned by then, we always look for a margin of safety and have chosen to reinvest this capital into other energy names with more favorable balance sheets is beyond reproach. Unlike land drilling, if a rig runs out of work it costs a lot of money to store (particularly floating rigs). We do not know if the cycle will last beyond the time when the bulk of Atwood’s revenue backlog runs out. The recent credit facility amendment greatly reduced Atwood’s flexibility and puts shareholders in a position where if they guess wrong about when the cycle turns they may lose their entire investment. We were not willing to underwrite that. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 2.81
ATW's P/E(ttm) is ranked higher than
71% of the 21 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 15.72 vs. ATW: 2.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
ATW' s P/E(ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.86  Med: 9.89 Max: 48
Current: 2.81
0.86
48
PE(NRI) 2.81
ATW's PE(NRI) is ranked higher than
68% of the 22 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 15.72 vs. ATW: 2.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
ATW' s PE(NRI) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.86  Med: 9.89 Max: 47.17
Current: 2.81
0.86
47.17
Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) 39.00
ATW's Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) is ranked lower than
90% of the 10 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 8.91 vs. ATW: 39.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) only.
ATW' s Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.7  Med: 20.85 Max: 318.81
Current: 39
5.7
318.81
P/B 0.23
ATW's P/B is ranked higher than
85% of the 61 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.52 vs. ATW: 0.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
ATW' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.12  Med: 1.63 Max: 5.07
Current: 0.23
0.12
5.07
P/S 0.75
ATW's P/S is ranked higher than
64% of the 64 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 1.05 vs. ATW: 0.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
ATW' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.27  Med: 3.69 Max: 8.48
Current: 0.75
0.27
8.48
PFCF 1.85
ATW's PFCF is ranked higher than
73% of the 37 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 7.15 vs. ATW: 1.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
ATW' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.09  Med: 31.75 Max: 451.18
Current: 1.85
1.09
451.18
POCF 1.22
ATW's POCF is ranked higher than
77% of the 47 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 3.41 vs. ATW: 1.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
ATW' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.58  Med: 8.14 Max: 43.73
Current: 1.22
0.58
43.73
EV-to-EBIT 4.81
ATW's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
73% of the 26 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 6.29 vs. ATW: 4.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
ATW' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3  Med: 10.05 Max: 37.7
Current: 4.81
3
37.7
EV-to-EBITDA 3.38
ATW's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
76% of the 41 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 6.47 vs. ATW: 3.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
ATW' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.4  Med: 8.1 Max: 22.3
Current: 3.38
2.4
22.3
PEG 0.22
ATW's PEG is ranked higher than
50% of the 8 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.22 vs. ATW: 0.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only.
ATW' s PEG Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.05  Med: 0.44 Max: 3.21
Current: 0.22
0.05
3.21
Shiller P/E 2.52
ATW's Shiller P/E is ranked higher than
82% of the 17 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 7.58 vs. ATW: 2.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
ATW' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.32  Med: 18.96 Max: 68.83
Current: 2.52
1.32
68.83
Current Ratio 7.96
ATW's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
88% of the 68 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 1.79 vs. ATW: 7.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
ATW' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.52  Med: 2.8 Max: 7.96
Current: 7.96
1.52
7.96
Quick Ratio 5.74
ATW's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
81% of the 68 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 1.51 vs. ATW: 5.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
ATW' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.27  Med: 2.21 Max: 5.74
Current: 5.74
1.27
5.74
Days Inventory 105.66
ATW's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
82% of the 45 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 40.56 vs. ATW: 105.66 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
ATW' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 47.68  Med: 77.38 Max: 111.22
Current: 105.66
47.68
111.22
Days Sales Outstanding 40.44
ATW's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
76% of the 54 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 57.64 vs. ATW: 40.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
ATW' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 40.44  Med: 72.41 Max: 94.08
Current: 40.44
40.44
94.08
Days Payable 22.70
ATW's Days Payable is ranked lower than
80% of the 40 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 40.38 vs. ATW: 22.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
ATW' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 22.7  Med: 49.79 Max: 184.52
Current: 22.7
22.7
184.52

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 0.63
ATW's Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
78% of the 67 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 3.75 vs. ATW: 0.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
ATW' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.63  Med: 3.04 Max: 14.65
Current: 0.63
0.63
14.65
Dividend Payout 0.02
ATW's Dividend Payout is ranked higher than
85% of the 13 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. ATW: 0.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout only.
ATW' s Dividend Payout Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.02  Med: 0.08 Max: 0.15
Current: 0.02
0.02
0.15
Yield on cost (5-Year) 0.64
ATW's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked lower than
83% of the 83 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 7.88 vs. ATW: 0.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
ATW' s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.64  Med: 3.04 Max: 14.65
Current: 0.64
0.64
14.65
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -0.40
ATW's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
65% of the 51 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -1.60 vs. ATW: -0.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
ATW' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.5  Med: -0.5 Max: 0.4
Current: -0.4
-4.5
0.4

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 0.24
ATW's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
86% of the 57 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.64 vs. ATW: 0.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
ATW' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.17  Med: 1.67 Max: 6.22
Current: 0.24
0.17
6.22
Price/Projected FCF 4.77
ATW's Price/Projected FCF is ranked lower than
96% of the 26 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.62 vs. ATW: 4.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
ATW' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.89  Med: 4.8 Max: 36.03
Current: 4.77
1.89
36.03
Price/DCF (Earnings Based) 0.18
ATW's Price/DCF (Earnings Based) is ranked lower than
100% of the 1 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.00 vs. ATW: 0.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/DCF (Earnings Based) only.
N/A
Price/Median PS Value 0.21
ATW's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
85% of the 54 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.88 vs. ATW: 0.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
ATW' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.15  Med: 0.94 Max: 2.32
Current: 0.21
0.15
2.32
Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value 0.20
ATW's Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value is ranked higher than
50% of the 4 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.17 vs. ATW: 0.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value only.
ATW' s Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.15  Med: 0.63 Max: 3.06
Current: 0.2
0.15
3.06
Price/Graham Number 0.18
ATW's Price/Graham Number is ranked higher than
82% of the 17 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.46 vs. ATW: 0.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
ATW' s Price/Graham Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.13  Med: 0.93 Max: 3.67
Current: 0.18
0.13
3.67
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 20.79
ATW's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
90% of the 69 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -5.10 vs. ATW: 20.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
ATW' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.7  Med: 9.95 Max: 33.4
Current: 20.79
2.7
33.4
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) -7.34
ATW's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked lower than
61% of the 31 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -3.32 vs. ATW: -7.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
ATW' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -51.2  Med: 10 Max: 50
Current: -7.34
-51.2
50

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $1,021
EPS (TTM) $ 4.08
Beta2.52
Short Percentage of Float60.69%
52-Week Range $4.82 - 14.80
Shares Outstanding (Mil)64.81

Analyst Estimate

Sep17 Sep18
Revenue (Mil $) 505 477
EPS ($) -0.65 -1.75
EPS w/o NRI ($) -0.65 -1.75
EPS Growth Rate
(3Y to 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends Per Share ($)
» More Articles for ATW

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Offshore Drillers Are Cheap for a Reason Nov 25 2016 
Prudential and Kelly Services Shine on This Measure Nov 09 2016 
Arnold Van Den Berg Makes One Buy and Three Large Increases in 3rd Quarter Oct 17 2016 
Atwood: Offshore Oil Company Value With Upside Potential Oct 17 2016 
Offshore Drillers: Beware the Value Trap Sep 12 2016 
There’s More Than One Way to Find a Great Stock Aug 25 2016 
Is It Time to Buy Atwood Oceanics? Aug 23 2016 
Noble Corporation Is a Value Investment Aug 18 2016 
Channeling the Late Great Ben Graham Aug 17 2016 
Is Atwood Oceanics Worth Considering After 3rd Quarter? Aug 15 2016 

More From Other Websites
Here is What Hedge Funds Think About Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) Dec 07 2016
ATWOOD OCEANICS INC Files SEC form 8-K, Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Financial... Dec 06 2016
ATWOOD OCEANICS ANNOUNCES CHANGES TO ULTRA-DEEPWATER DRILLSHIP DELIVERY AND MILESTONE PAYMENT... Dec 06 2016
9:02 am Atwood Oceanics announces agreement with Daewoo Shipbuilding & marine Engineering Co to... Dec 06 2016
Finding the Bullish and Bearish Reversals Dec 05 2016
Atwood Oceanics Breaks Out on OPEC News (ATW) Dec 04 2016
Ensco, Atwood Charts Don't Tell Full Story (ESV, ATW) Dec 04 2016
Seadrill Partners Maintains Its Distributions, Has a Yield of 11% Dec 01 2016
Zacks.com featured highlights: Dean Foods, Cloud Peak Energy, Atwood Oceanics, Avon Products and Big... Dec 01 2016
Atwood Oceanics, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : ATW-US : December 1,... Dec 01 2016
Offshore Drilling Stocks’ Upgrades and Downgrades in November Nov 30 2016
5 Stocks Exhibiting Recent Broker Rating Upgrades Nov 30 2016
ATWOOD OCEANICS TO PRESENT AT THE JEFFERIES 2016 ENERGY CONFERENCE Nov 29 2016
Is Atwood Stock Coming Off a Double Bottom? (ATW) Nov 28 2016
ETFs with exposure to Atwood Oceanics, Inc. : November 28, 2016 Nov 28 2016
Analysts Have Been Quiet on Seadrill for Some Time Nov 28 2016
ATWOOD OCEANICS INC Financials Nov 23 2016
ATWOOD OCEANICS INC Files SEC form 8-K, Change in Directors or Principal Officers, Financial... Nov 22 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)