Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.14
ATW's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
61% of the 72 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.22 vs. ATW: 0.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
ATW' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.04  Med: 0.27 Max: 5.58
Current: 0.14
0.04
5.58
Equity to Asset 0.64
ATW's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
71% of the 69 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.54 vs. ATW: 0.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
ATW' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.5  Med: 0.67 Max: 0.86
Current: 0.64
0.5
0.86
Interest Coverage 9.15
ATW's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
66% of the 32 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 6.75 vs. ATW: 9.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
ATW' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.11  Med: 61.00 Max: 173.48
Current: 9.15
10.11
173.48
F-Score: 8
Z-Score: 1.85
M-Score: -2.82
WACC vs ROIC
8.07%
10.20%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 9/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 38.83
ATW's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
93% of the 68 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -7.02 vs. ATW: 38.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
ATW' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 34.62  Med: 40.47 Max: 50.95
Current: 38.83
34.62
50.95
Net-margin (%) 32.76
ATW's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
94% of the 69 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -18.57 vs. ATW: 32.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
ATW' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 29.03  Med: 34.53 Max: 42.75
Current: 32.76
29.03
42.75
ROE (%) 14.60
ATW's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
91% of the 69 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -11.37 vs. ATW: 14.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
ATW' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.31  Med: 19.38 Max: 29.52
Current: 14.6
14.31
29.52
ROA (%) 8.99
ATW's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
93% of the 74 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -6.88 vs. ATW: 8.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
ATW' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.35  Med: 14.53 Max: 23.7
Current: 8.99
8.35
23.7
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 11.94
ATW's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
85% of the 73 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -9.81 vs. ATW: 11.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
ATW' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.54  Med: 19.90 Max: 33.16
Current: 11.94
11.54
33.16
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 21.50
ATW's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
87% of the 55 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -6.40 vs. ATW: 21.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
ATW' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.2  Med: 16.50 Max: 42.5
Current: 21.5
-1.2
42.5
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 22.20
ATW's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
79% of the 47 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -0.30 vs. ATW: 22.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
ATW' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -20.7  Med: 16.50 Max: 64.4
Current: 22.2
-20.7
64.4
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 17.10
ATW's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
69% of the 35 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -0.10 vs. ATW: 17.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
ATW' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -34.9  Med: 10.40 Max: 153
Current: 17.1
-34.9
153
» ATW's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: Est. 2016-07-30)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Oprt. Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2015

ATW Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Joel Greenblatt 121,698 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 1,025,800 sh (+463.32%)
David Dreman 274,778 sh (+7.52%)
Prem Watsa 8,000 sh (unchged)
FPA Capital Fund 1,065,100 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Chuck Royce 2,231,819 sh (-0.71%)
First Pacific Advisors 2,610,200 sh (-2.29%)
Arnold Van Den Berg 674,166 sh (-5.75%)
Paul Tudor Jones 18,600 sh (-9.71%)
» More
Q3 2015

ATW Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Jim Simons 1,348,800 sh (New)
Jeremy Grantham 51,100 sh (New)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 122,667 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 52,900 sh (+184.41%)
Steven Cohen 1,493,800 sh (+45.62%)
Arnold Van Den Berg 920,760 sh (+36.58%)
David Dreman 276,722 sh (+0.71%)
FPA Capital Fund Sold Out
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Prem Watsa Sold Out
First Pacific Advisors Sold Out
Chuck Royce 1,147,291 sh (-48.59%)
» More
Q4 2015

ATW Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Prem Watsa 10,600 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 54,600 sh (+3.21%)
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Jeremy Grantham Sold Out
Chuck Royce Sold Out
Arnold Van Den Berg 879,288 sh (-4.50%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 117,059 sh (-4.57%)
David Dreman 260,568 sh (-5.84%)
Jim Simons 167,000 sh (-87.62%)
» More
Q1 2016

ATW Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Jeremy Grantham 39,000 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 762,574 sh (New)
Chuck Royce 135,909 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 1,037,700 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 81,000 sh (+48.35%)
David Dreman 276,976 sh (+6.30%)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss Sold Out
Prem Watsa Sold Out
Arnold Van Den Berg 854,388 sh (-2.83%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with ATW

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - Drilling » Oil & Gas Drilling
Compare:NYSE:RIGP, NYSE:UNT, OTCPK:ESVIF, OTCPK:CESDF, OTCPK:PTHRF, NYSE:SBR, NYSE:SDLP, OTCPK:TDGCF, NAS:ORIG, NYSE:PES, OTCPK:FOEAY, NYSE:ICD, OTCPK:WEEEF, NYSE:PACD, OTCPK:NATDF, OTCPK:SVGYF, OTCPK:AWLCF, OTCPK:PHXHF, OTCPK:FLKOF, OTCPK:PGNPQ » details
Traded in other countries:AWZ.Germany,
Atwood Oceanics Inc is an offshore drilling contractor, engaged in drilling and completion of exploratory and developmental oil and gas wells.

Atwood Oceanics Inc was organized in 1968 as a Texas corporation and commenced operations in 1970. It is headquartered in Houston, Texas with support offices in Australia, Malaysia, Singapore and the United Kingdom. The Company is an offshore drilling contractor, engaged in drilling and completion of exploratory and developmental oil and gas wells. It owns 13 mobile offshore drilling units located in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, the Mediterranean Sea, offshore West Africa, offshore Southeast Asia and offshore Australia, is constructing three ultra-deepwater drillships. Its various types of drilling rigs are Ultra-Deep-water Drill-ships, Semisubmersible Rigs, Semisubmersible Tender Assist Rigs and Jack-up Drilling Rigs. The Ultra-Deepwater Drillships are self-propelled vessels, shaped like conventional ships, and are mobile of the rig types. Semisubmersible rigs have two hulls, the lower of which is capable of being flooded. Semisubmersible tender assist rigs operate similar to semisubmersible rigs except that their drilling equipment is temporarily installed on permanently constructed offshore support platforms. A jack-up drilling rig consists of a single hull supported by at least three legs positioned on the sea floor. It is typically towed to the well site and once on location, its legs are lowered to the sea floor and the unit is raised out of the water by jacking the hull up the legs. It competes with several international offshore drilling contractors. Its competitors include Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc., Ensco PLC, Noble Corporation, Rowan Companies PLC, Seadrill Limited, and Transocean Ltd. It complies with government regulation in the form of international conventions, federal, state and local laws and regulations in jurisdictions where its vessels operate and are registered. The Company is subject to changing tax laws, treaties and regulations in and between countries in which it operates.

Guru Investment Theses on Atwood Oceanics Inc

FPA Capital Fund Comments on Atwood - Dec 09, 2015

During the third quarter, we sold our investment in Atwood (NYSE:ATW) and reinvested the proceeds in PTEN. There are many things to like about Atwood, including their young fleet of high-spec rigs, their significant revenue backlog, their industry leading margins and revenue efficiency, their track record of safe operations, and their seasoned board of directors. The problem with Atwood is they have debt maturing in the next three years. While we imagine the cycle may have turned by then, we always look for a margin of safety and have chosen to reinvest this capital into other energy names with more favorable balance sheets is beyond reproach. Unlike land drilling, if a rig runs out of work it costs a lot of money to store (particularly floating rigs). We do not know if the cycle will last beyond the time when the bulk of Atwood’s revenue backlog runs out. The recent credit facility amendment greatly reduced Atwood’s flexibility and puts shareholders in a position where if they guess wrong about when the cycle turns they may lose their entire investment. We were not willing to underwrite that.

By selling the shares of Atwood and reinvesting in Patterson we do give up some revenue backlog, but we pick up another well run dividend paying company at a discount to tangible book value with a much better balance sheet and greater liquidity. Crucially, it costs very little money to store Patterson’s land drilling rigs or pressure pumping equipment in a yard if either are idled. We have confidence that by selling Atwood and investing in Patterson we have reduced our downside risk. Recall that we executed a similar swap in the first quarter of this year, when we replaced our Ensco holding with Helmerich & Payne for the very same reasons: similar upside but significantly greater downside protection.

From FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio)'s third quarter 2015 letter to shareholders.

Check out FPA Capital Fund latest stock trades

FPA Capital Fund Comments on Atwood Oceanics Inc - Feb 19, 2015

Atwood Oceanics (ATW) is an offshore drilling contractor. They have been an industry leader in utilization rates, profit margins, and returns on capital for years, and they have been profitable 19 of the last 20 years. Our thesis for purchasing the stock was that the company had almost completely renewed its fleet over the last few years and signed those rigs to contracts that gave it one of the biggest backlogs in the industry. We are currently modeling in our Base Case that 98/77/36% of the total revenue we expect them to generate in FY2015/16/17 is already under contract. We believed the culture and business practices behind the company’s peer-leading efficiencies would allow them to convert that backlog into substantial profits and initiate a meaningful dividend, which they recently implemented ($1/share per year).

The stock’s negative performance in the fourth quarter is due to a combination of macro and company-specific factors. Macro: Spot prices for Brent Oil fell by nearly 40% during the quarter, as discussed above, and the Philadelphia Oil Service Sector index had a total return of (20.38%). Company-specific: Atwood delayed the delivery of their two uncontracted newbuild drillships by 6 months because they lost out on a customer tender that would have put them to work at decent rates of ~$400k/day. However, even if drillship dayrates fall further to $350k/day the company should still earn $3/share by FY2017 when most of their backlog will have burned off. At the Dec-31 price of $28.37 the stock is trading at less than 10x that figure (and yielding 3.52%), but in the intervening two years the company should earn ~$12 per share, or greater than 40% of the current market cap. The company-specific elements of our thesis are still intact.

From FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio) Q4 2014 Letter.

Check out FPA Capital Fund latest stock trades

FPA Capital Fund Comments on Atwood Oceanics - Jul 23, 2014

We added to a number of existing positions in the quarter and started one new position, which is too small of a position to talk about at this point. Among the stocks that we added to in the quarter were Atwood Oceanics (ATW) and Titan International (TWI).

Although ATW appreciated roughly 4% in the June quarter, in early April the stock was down 10% from its closing first quarter price. As we mentioned last quarter, when we also added to the position, investors are concerned about the prices the company can charge to rent out its equipment to its customers. Atwood owns off-shore drilling rigs, some of which cost upwards of $600 million apiece to construct today.

These $600 million rigs, typically very sophisticated drill ships, allow ATW’s oil & gas exploration customers to drill in the ultra-deep waters (UDW) of the Gulf of Mexico, off the coast of western Africa, or in the deep waters of Brazil. These deep water basins, and other basins, hold the potential to extract over a hundred billion barrels of oil over the next few decades. However, these are very expensive and long- term projects, which not every oil company has access to or the capital to risk. Hence, ATW’s drill ships can potentially be rented out to a narrower group of customers than rigs for shallow water drilling (typically four-hundred feet of water depth), where the company’s jack-up drilling rigs operate.

While there are a number of potentially large oil & gas reserves in the ultra-deep waters, generally 7,500 feet of water or deeper, the timing of when these projects get started can be lumpy. Additionally, ATW is not the only drilling rig operator that sees this very large opportunity, so the company’s competitors have also ordered new UDW drill ships. Thus, the market is concerned about a temporary supply and demand imbalance for UDW drill ships.

In our conservative analysis, we think UDW drill ship rental rates may fall from roughly $600,000 a day, which is where day rates were in late 2013, to roughly $500,000 a day. In this downside scenario, we estimate that ATW could earn close to $5.00 a share this year and over $7.00 a share in 2015 and 2016. This also assumes one of the company’s semi-submersible rigs is idled later this year. With ATW trading below $50, we believe the risk-to-reward ratio warranted additional capital being deployed in the stock. Subsequent to our additional purchases in the second quarter, two of ATW’s competitors announced new UDW drill ship contracts at much higher rates than many investors and Wall Street analysts expected. We think these recent higher day rate contracts, which were also higher than our conservative case expectations, bode well for Atwood’s two remaining un-contracted UDW drill ships.

From FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio)’s Second Quarter 2014 Commentary.

Check out FPA Capital Fund latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Atwood Oceanics Inc

FPA Capital Fund Comments on Atwood Guru stock highlight
During the third quarter, we sold our investment in Atwood (NYSE:ATW) and reinvested the proceeds in PTEN. There are many things to like about Atwood, including their young fleet of high-spec rigs, their significant revenue backlog, their industry leading margins and revenue efficiency, their track record of safe operations, and their seasoned board of directors. The problem with Atwood is they have debt maturing in the next three years. While we imagine the cycle may have turned by then, we always look for a margin of safety and have chosen to reinvest this capital into other energy names with more favorable balance sheets is beyond reproach. Unlike land drilling, if a rig runs out of work it costs a lot of money to store (particularly floating rigs). We do not know if the cycle will last beyond the time when the bulk of Atwood’s revenue backlog runs out. The recent credit facility amendment greatly reduced Atwood’s flexibility and puts shareholders in a position where if they guess wrong about when the cycle turns they may lose their entire investment. We were not willing to underwrite that. Read more...
5-Year Lows: 3D Systems Corp., Atwood Oceanics, Seacor Holdings, Rent-A-Center Inc. Companies that have reached their 5-year low prices
According to GuruFocus list of five-year lows, these guru stocks have reached their historical low prices: 3D Systems Corp., Atwood Oceanics Inc., Seacor Holdings Inc. and Rent-A-Center Inc. Read more...
FPA Capital Sells Stakes in Oil and Gas Companies Fund adds to stakes in SM Energy, Helmerich & Payne
When FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio) invests, its preference is to invest in small, undervalued companies. In 2012, that approach nearly produced a 10% return. In 2013, it did even better than that, posting returns of nearly 23%. Read more...
5-Year Lows: Atwood Oceanics Inc, HMS Holdings Corp, Advanced Micro Devices Inc, and Government Properties Income Trust
According to GuruFocus list of 5-year lows, these Guru stocks have reached their 5-year lows: Atwood Oceanics Inc, HMS Holdings Corp, Advanced Micro Devices Inc, and Government Properties Income Trust Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 1.81
ATW's P/E(ttm) is ranked higher than
86% of the 29 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 7.79 vs. ATW: 1.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
ATW' s P/E(ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.86  Med: 10.12 Max: 50.6
Current: 1.81
0.86
50.6
PE(NRI) 1.81
ATW's PE(NRI) is ranked higher than
90% of the 29 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 7.02 vs. ATW: 1.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
ATW' s PE(NRI) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.86  Med: 10.13 Max: 48.95
Current: 1.81
0.86
48.95
Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) 144.51
ATW's Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) is ranked lower than
100% of the 10 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 4.80 vs. ATW: 144.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) only.
ATW' s Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.54  Med: 21.43 Max: 150.37
Current: 144.51
5.54
150.37
P/B 0.25
ATW's P/B is ranked higher than
76% of the 68 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.55 vs. ATW: 0.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
ATW' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.12  Med: 1.65 Max: 5.07
Current: 0.25
0.12
5.07
P/S 0.59
ATW's P/S is ranked higher than
62% of the 65 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.82 vs. ATW: 0.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
ATW' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.27  Med: 3.79 Max: 8.48
Current: 0.59
0.27
8.48
PFCF 4.09
ATW's PFCF is ranked lower than
57% of the 35 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 3.90 vs. ATW: 4.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
ATW' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.84  Med: 34.75 Max: 451.18
Current: 4.09
1.84
451.18
POCF 1.21
ATW's POCF is ranked higher than
67% of the 46 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 2.30 vs. ATW: 1.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
ATW' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.58  Med: 8.41 Max: 43.73
Current: 1.21
0.58
43.73
EV-to-EBIT 4.03
ATW's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
79% of the 28 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. ATW: 4.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
ATW' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3  Med: 10.30 Max: 42
Current: 4.03
3
42
EV-to-EBITDA 3.05
ATW's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
83% of the 42 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 6.94 vs. ATW: 3.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
ATW' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.7  Med: 8.40 Max: 22.4
Current: 3.05
2.7
22.4
PEG 0.13
ATW's PEG is ranked higher than
50% of the 14 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.13 vs. ATW: 0.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only.
ATW' s PEG Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.05  Med: 0.46 Max: 3.21
Current: 0.13
0.05
3.21
Shiller P/E 2.64
ATW's Shiller P/E is ranked higher than
83% of the 18 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 6.64 vs. ATW: 2.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
ATW' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.32  Med: 19.51 Max: 68.83
Current: 2.64
1.32
68.83
Current Ratio 6.32
ATW's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
86% of the 71 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 1.65 vs. ATW: 6.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
ATW' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.61  Med: 2.90 Max: 6.32
Current: 6.32
0.61
6.32
Quick Ratio 5.17
ATW's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
85% of the 71 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 1.55 vs. ATW: 5.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
ATW' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.49  Med: 2.33 Max: 5.17
Current: 5.17
0.49
5.17
Days Inventory 91.52
ATW's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
75% of the 48 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 40.25 vs. ATW: 91.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
ATW' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 47.68  Med: 73.61 Max: 90.62
Current: 91.52
47.68
90.62
Days Sales Outstanding 67.70
ATW's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
71% of the 58 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 57.98 vs. ATW: 67.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
ATW' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 49.32  Med: 76.33 Max: 105.85
Current: 67.7
49.32
105.85
Days Payable 31.47
ATW's Days Payable is ranked lower than
51% of the 51 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 33.15 vs. ATW: 31.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
ATW' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 22.98  Med: 49.79 Max: 184.52
Current: 31.47
22.98
184.52

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 4.85
ATW's Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
53% of the 70 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 4.26 vs. ATW: 4.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
ATW' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.73  Med: 4.84 Max: 14.65
Current: 4.85
0.73
14.65
Dividend Payout 0.09
ATW's Dividend Payout is ranked higher than
81% of the 21 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.29 vs. ATW: 0.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout only.
ATW' s Dividend Payout Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.11  Med: 0.13 Max: 0.35
Current: 0.09
0.11
0.35
Yield on cost (5-Year) 4.70
ATW's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked lower than
89% of the 79 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 12.00 vs. ATW: 4.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
ATW' s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.73  Med: 4.99 Max: 14.65
Current: 4.7
0.73
14.65
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 0.40
ATW's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
85% of the 52 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -1.70 vs. ATW: 0.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
ATW' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.5  Med: -0.60 Max: 0.4
Current: 0.4
-4.5
0.4

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 0.26
ATW's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
79% of the 62 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.59 vs. ATW: 0.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
ATW' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.19  Med: 1.99 Max: 6.22
Current: 0.26
0.19
6.22
Price/DCF (Earnings Based) 0.07
ATW's Price/DCF (Earnings Based) is ranked higher than
50% of the 2 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.07 vs. ATW: 0.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/DCF (Earnings Based) only.
N/A
Price/Median PS Value 0.16
ATW's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
77% of the 64 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.59 vs. ATW: 0.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
ATW' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.12  Med: 0.98 Max: 2.24
Current: 0.16
0.12
2.24
Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value 0.12
ATW's Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value is ranked higher than
67% of the 6 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. ATW: 0.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value only.
ATW' s Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.09  Med: 0.71 Max: 3.06
Current: 0.12
0.09
3.06
Price/Graham Number 0.15
ATW's Price/Graham Number is ranked higher than
81% of the 21 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.45 vs. ATW: 0.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
ATW' s Price/Graham Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.11  Med: 1.17 Max: 3.67
Current: 0.15
0.11
3.67
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 24.80
ATW's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
92% of the 72 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -7.10 vs. ATW: 24.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
ATW' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.4  Med: 9.70 Max: 33.4
Current: 24.8
2.4
33.4
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) -10.56
ATW's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked lower than
64% of the 28 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -3.13 vs. ATW: -10.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
ATW' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -51.3  Med: 10.10 Max: 50
Current: -10.56
-51.3
50

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $1,298
EPS (TTM) $ 6.54
Beta2.40
Short Percentage of Float53.63%
52-Week Range $4.82 - 27.69
Shares Outstanding (Mil)64.80

Analyst Estimate

Sep16 Sep17 Sep18
Revenue (Mil $) 1,011 598 510
EPS ($) 4.03 -0.50 -0.80
EPS w/o NRI ($) 4.03 -0.50 -0.80
EPS Growth Rate
(3Y to 5Y Estimate)
N/A
» More Articles for ATW

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Is Atwood Oceanics Worth Buying After Big Rally? Jun 08 2016 
DCF Calculator IDs Undervalued Stocks May 09 2016 
Ben Graham's Lessons on Liquidating Value Feb 10 2016 
Prem Watsa Sells Polypore, Advent Software Jan 07 2016 
5-Year Lows: Hecla Mining, Solar Capital, Atwood Oceanics, Harsco Dec 28 2015 
FPA Capital Fund Comments on Atwood Dec 09 2015 
Ensco, Atwood Oceanics, Allegheny Technologies Among Van Den Berg's Holdings With High Yields Dec 01 2015 
5-Year Lows: 3D Systems Corp., Atwood Oceanics, Seacor Holdings, Rent-A-Center Inc. Nov 30 2015 
Seadrill Among David Dreman's Holdings Trading Below Peter Lynch Earnings Line Nov 06 2015 
FPA Capital Sells Stakes in Oil and Gas Companies Oct 13 2015 

More From Other Websites
2:09 am Atwood Oceanics commences modified Dutch Auction tender offer for up to $150 mln of its... Jun 27 2016
Atwood Oceanics, Inc. Announces Cash Tender Offer for Senior Notes Jun 24 2016
Atwood Oceanics, Inc. Announces Cash Tender Offer for Senior Notes Jun 24 2016
Here Are Smart Money’s Favorite Offshore Drilling Bets Jun 20 2016
ATWOOD OCEANICS TO PRESENT AT THE 2016 WELLS FARGO WEST COAST ENERGY CONFERENCE Jun 17 2016
ATWOOD OCEANICS TO PRESENT AT THE 2016 WELLS FARGO WEST COAST ENERGY CONFERENCE Jun 17 2016
Atwood Oceanics downgraded by Johnson Rice Jun 13 2016
Offshore Drillers: Rig Count Stabilizing…For Now Jun 10 2016
ATWOOD OCEANICS TO PRESENT AT THE BARCLAYS HIGH YIELD BOND CONFERENCE Jun 08 2016
ATWOOD OCEANICS TO PRESENT AT THE BARCLAYS HIGH YIELD BOND CONFERENCE Jun 08 2016
Offshore Drillers: Be Afraid, Short Sellers, Be Very Afraid Jun 08 2016
Is Atwood Oceanics Worth Buying After Big Rally? Jun 08 2016
ATWOOD OCEANICS INC Files SEC form 8-K, Change in Directors or Principal Officers, Financial... May 27 2016
ETF’s with exposure to Atwood Oceanics, Inc. : May 26, 2016 May 26 2016
ATWOOD OCEANICS INC Financials May 14 2016
ATWOOD OCEANICS TO PRESENT AT THE CITI GLOBAL ENERGY & UTILITIES CONFERENCE May 10 2016
ATWOOD OCEANICS TO PRESENT AT THE CITI GLOBAL ENERGY & UTILITIES CONFERENCE May 10 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)