Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.23
NYSE:CBI's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
78% of the 1031 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.99 vs. NYSE:CBI: 0.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
NYSE:CBI' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.07  Med: 0.72 Max: 24.03
Current: 0.23
0.07
24.03
Equity-to-Asset 0.18
NYSE:CBI's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
86% of the 1007 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.42 vs. NYSE:CBI: 0.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
NYSE:CBI' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.18  Med: 0.29 Max: 0.43
Current: 0.18
0.18
0.43
Piotroski F-Score: 5
Altman Z-Score: 1.54
Beneish M-Score: -3.39
WACC vs ROIC
9.16%
-4.24%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % -1.36
NYSE:CBI's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
84% of the 1016 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 5.01 vs. NYSE:CBI: -1.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
NYSE:CBI' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.29  Med: 6.54 Max: 8.33
Current: -1.36
-3.29
8.33
Net Margin % -2.93
NYSE:CBI's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
85% of the 1021 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.42 vs. NYSE:CBI: -2.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
NYSE:CBI' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.9  Med: 3.96 Max: 5.62
Current: -2.93
-3.9
5.62
ROE % -15.67
NYSE:CBI's ROE % is ranked lower than
91% of the 1016 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 7.81 vs. NYSE:CBI: -15.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
NYSE:CBI' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -21.23  Med: 22.12 Max: 26.1
Current: -15.67
-21.23
26.1
ROA % -3.47
NYSE:CBI's ROA % is ranked lower than
87% of the 1038 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.13 vs. NYSE:CBI: -3.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NYSE:CBI' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.43  Med: 6.21 Max: 8.24
Current: -3.47
-5.43
8.24
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % -22.52
NYSE:CBI's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
92% of the 1030 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 17.74 vs. NYSE:CBI: -22.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NYSE:CBI' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -60.6  Med: 100.93 Max: 131.47
Current: -22.52
-60.6
131.47
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 0.20
NYSE:CBI's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
59% of the 845 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.70 vs. NYSE:CBI: 0.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
NYSE:CBI' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -10  Med: 9.95 Max: 41.7
Current: 0.2
-10
41.7
GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with Chicago Bridge & Iron Co NV $NYSE:CBI.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NYSE:CBI's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-05-28 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2016

CBI Guru Trades in Q1 2016

David Dreman 1,528 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 391,300 sh (New)
Jim Simons 320,130 sh (+81.96%)
Francis Chou 67,446 sh (unchged)
PRIMECAP Management 120,000 sh (unchged)
Chuck Royce 2,000 sh (unchged)
David Einhorn Sold Out
David Tepper Sold Out
Tom Russo 7,475 sh (-3.24%)
Richard Snow 186,690 sh (-26.60%)
Joel Greenblatt 412,936 sh (-60.00%)
Arnold Van Den Berg 970 sh (-99.87%)
» More
Q2 2016

CBI Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Paul Tudor Jones 26,405 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 1,324,800 sh (+238.56%)
Jim Simons 562,830 sh (+75.81%)
Joel Greenblatt 443,849 sh (+7.49%)
Francis Chou 67,446 sh (unchged)
PRIMECAP Management 120,000 sh (unchged)
Tom Russo Sold Out
Chuck Royce Sold Out
Arnold Van Den Berg Sold Out
Richard Snow 181,360 sh (-2.86%)
David Dreman 899 sh (-41.16%)
» More
Q3 2016

CBI Guru Trades in Q3 2016

David Dreman 5,609 sh (+523.92%)
Steven Cohen 1,763,500 sh (+33.11%)
Francis Chou 67,446 sh (unchged)
PRIMECAP Management 120,000 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen 874,600 sh (unchged)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
Joel Greenblatt 386,254 sh (-12.98%)
Richard Snow 85,095 sh (-53.08%)
» More
Q4 2016

CBI Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Paul Tudor Jones 10,100 sh (New)
Pioneer Investments 696,997 sh (New)
Richard Snow 162,029 sh (+90.41%)
Francis Chou 67,446 sh (unchged)
PRIMECAP Management Sold Out
David Dreman 4,750 sh (-15.31%)
Joel Greenblatt 206,588 sh (-46.51%)
Steven Cohen 25,000 sh (-98.58%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CBI

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Engineering & Construction » Engineering & Construction    NAICS: 238990    SIC: 1799
Compare:NYSE:STN, NYSE:DY, NYSE:MTZ, OTCPK:NCCBF, OTCPK:WSPOF, NAS:TTEK, NYSE:EME, OTCPK:BAFYY, NYSE:KBR, NYSE:GVA, OTCPK:AGRUF, OTCPK:DNERF, OTCPK:IPGOF, OTCPK:JGCCY, NYSE:TPC, OTCPK:PUODY, NYSE:FIX, OTCPK:ARCAY, OTCPK:CKPCF, NAS:PRIM » details
Traded in other countries:BDZ.Germany,
Headquarter Location:Netherlands
Chicago Bridge & Iron Co NV provides conceptual design, technology, engineering, procurement, fabrication, construction, commissioning, maintenance, program management and environmental services to customers in the energy infrastructure.

Founded in 1889, Chicago Bridge & Iron provides a wide range of services, including conceptual design, technology, engineering, procurement, fabrication, modularization, construction, commissioning, maintenance, program management, and environmental services to customers in the global energy infrastructure market. It also provides diversified government services. It generated adjusted revenue and adjusted EBIT of $10.9 billion and $866 million, respectively, in 2015. CB&I employs 42,000 at active projects in more than 70 countries.

Top Ranked Articles about Chicago Bridge & Iron Co NV

SHAREHOLDER NOTICE: Lundin Law PC Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. and Reminds Investors with Losses to Contact the Firm
CHICAGO BRIDGE SHAREHOLDER ALERT BY FORMER LOUISIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL: KAHN SWICK & FOTI, LLC REMINDS INVESTORS WITH LOSSES IN EXCESS OF $100,000 of Lead Plaintiff Deadline in Class Action Lawsuit Against Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. – (CBI)
CBI Investor Deadline Reminder: Hagens Berman Reminds Investors in Chicago Bridge & Iron Company of the May 1, 2017 Lead Plaintiff Deadline in the Securities Class Action Related to Possible Accounting Improprieties
The Klein Law Firm Announces a Class Action Filed on Behalf of CBI Shareholders and a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of May 1, 2017
IMPORTANT INVESTOR ALERT: Lundin Law PC Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. and Reminds Investors with Losses to Contact the Firm
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Brower Piven Encourages Investors Who Have Losses In Excess Of $100,000 From Investment In Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. (CBI) To Contact Brower Piven Before The Lead Plaintiff Deadline In Class Action Lawsuit
SHAREHOLDER ALERT - Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Notifies Investors of Class Action Against Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. (CBI) & Lead Plaintiff Deadline: May 2, 2017

NEW YORK, March 30, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Attorney Advertising -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC notifies investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. ("CBI" or the “Company”) (:CBI) and certain of its officers, and is on behalf of a class consisting of all persons or entities who purchased CBI securities between October 29, 2013 and December 10, 2014, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are advised to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/cbi. This class action seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). The complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose material adverse information regarding the CBI’s business, prospects and financial results.  Specifically, the complaint alleges that defendants failed to disclose that the company was responsible for hundreds of millions of dollars in liability and had improperly accounted for its goodwill during 2013 to cover losses associated with construction delays and cost overruns on the Nuclear Projects.  The complaint continues to allege that CBI failed to establish and disclose an appropriate reserve for this liability in its financial statements and CBI lacked effective internal controls over financial reporting.  Due to these false statements and/or omissions, CBI stock traded at artificially exaggerated prices of over $87 per share during the Class Period. On June 17, 2014, Prescience Point reported that CBI had inappropriately accounted for its goodwill during 2013 to cover damages from construction delays and cost overruns on the Nuclear Projects. Following this news, CBI stock dropped over 8% to close at $68.19 per share.  Following the revelation of added information about the Nuclear Projects status and who might be liable for the cost overruns and project delays, CBI stock continued to drop to under $40 per share from June 2014 through December 2014. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint you can visit the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/cbi or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Investor Relations Analyst, Yael Hurwitz of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 212-697-6484. If you suffered a loss in CBI you have until May 2, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff.  Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a corporate litigation boutique.  Our primary expertise is the aggressive pursuit of litigation claims on behalf of our clients.  In addition to representing institutions and other investor plaintiffs in class action security litigation, the firm’s expertise includes general corporate and commercial litigation, as well as securities arbitration.  Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Contact:
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Peretz Bronstein or Yael Hurwitz
212-697-6484 | [email protected]

Read more...
CBI Investor Deadline Reminder: Hagens Berman Reminds Investors in Chicago Bridge & Iron Company of the May 1, 2017 Lead Plaintiff Deadline in the Securities Class Action Related to Possible Accounting Improprieties

SAN FRANCISCO, March 29, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP reminds investors in Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. (:CBI) of the May 1, 2017 Lead Plaintiff deadline in the pending securities class action.
If you purchased or otherwise acquired securities of CBI between October 29, 2013 and December 10, 2014 and suffered losses contact Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP.  For more information visit: https://www.hbsslaw.com/cases/CBI or contact Reed Kathrein, who is leading the firm’s investigation, by calling 510-725-3000 or emailing [email protected]. The securities class action concerns the Company’s February 2013 acquisition of – and related accounting for – a business known as The Shaw Group.  Through the Shaw acquisition, CBI would acquire purportedly high-value contracts to complete construction of new nuclear power plants that included Plant Vogtle. On June 17, 2014, Prescience Point issued a report entitled “Acquisition Accounting Gone Nuclear” concluding that defendants misstated the Company’s previously reported balance sheet, income from operations and earnings per share through inappropriate acquisition accounting for Shaw.  This news drove the price of CBI shares down over 8% to close at $68.26 that day. On December 10, 2014, TradeFair Group reported that longer delays are likely for the Vogtle reactors.  Between December 7, 2014 and December 12, 2014, as the market digested this information, the price of CBI’s shares fell almost 15% to close at $39.14 on December 12. “We’re focused on what may be serious violations of generally accepted accounting principles in connection with the Company’s business combination with Shaw that, if true, had a material impact on CBI’s financial condition,” said Hagens Berman partner Reed Kathrein. Whistleblowers: Persons with non-public information regarding CBI should consider their options to help in the investigation or take advantage of the SEC Whistleblower program.  Under the new SEC whistleblower program, whistleblowers who provide original information may receive rewards totaling up to 30 percent of any successful recovery made by the SEC.  For more information, call Reed Kathrein at 510-725-3000 or email [email protected]. About Hagens Berman
Hagens Berman is a national investor-rights law firm headquartered in Seattle, Washington with offices in 10 cities.  The Firm represents investors, whistleblowers, workers and consumers in complex litigation. More about the Firm and its successes can be found at www.hbsslaw.com.  For the latest news visit our newsroom or follow us on Twitter at @classactionlaw.
Contact:
Reed Kathrein, 510-725-3000

Read more...
IMPORTANT INVESTOR ALERT: Khang & Khang LLP Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. and Encourages Investors with Losses to Contact the Firm

IRVINE, Calif., March 28, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Khang & Khang LLP (the “Firm”) announces a class action lawsuit against Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. (“Chicago Bridge” or the “Company”) (:CBI). Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired shares between October 29, 2013 and December 10, 2014, inclusive (the “Class Period”), are encouraged to contact the Firm in advance of the May 1, 2017 lead plaintiff motion deadline.
If you purchased shares of Chicago Bridge during the Class Period, please contact Joon M. Khang, Esquire, of Khang & Khang, 18101 Von Karman Avenue, 3rd Floor, Irvine, CA 92612, by telephone: (949) 419-3834, or via e-mail at [email protected]. There has been no class certification in this case. Until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. You may choose to take no action and remain a passive class member. The complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, the Company made material false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose: that Chicago Bridge was responsible for hundreds of millions of dollars in liability and improperly accounted for its goodwill during 2013, to cover losses associated with construction delays and cost overruns on contracts to complete construction on two new nuclear power plants; that the Company failed to establish and disclose an appropriate reserve for this liability in its financial statements; and that Chicago Bridge lacked effective internal controls over financial reporting. When this news was revealed to the public, shares of Chicago Bridge fell in value, causing investors harm. If you wish to learn more about this lawsuit, or if you have questions concerning this notice or your rights, please contact Joon M. Khang, a prominent litigator for almost two decades, by telephone: (949) 419-3834, or via e-mail at [email protected]. This press release may constitute Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions.
Joon M. Khang, Esq.
Telephone: 949-419-3834
Facsimile: 949-225-4474
[email protected]

Read more...
CBI SHAREHOLDER ALERT: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong Notifies Investors of Commencement of a Class Action Involving Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. and a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of May 1, 2017

NEW YORK, March 28, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that a class action lawsuit has been commenced in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of investors who purchased Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. ("Chicago Bridge & Iron") (:CBI) securities between October 29, 2013 and December 10, 2014.
Click here to learn about the case: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-sa/chicago-bridge-iron-company-n-v. There is no cost or obligation to you. According to the complaint, throughout the Class Period, the Company issued materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Chicago Bridge was responsible for hundreds of millions of dollars in liability and had improperly accounted for its goodwill during 2013 to cover losses associated with construction delays and cost overruns on contracts to complete construction on two new nuclear power plants; (ii) failed to establish and disclose an appropriate reserve for this liability in its financial statements; and (iii) lacked effective internal controls over financial reporting. If you suffered a loss in Chicago Bridge & Iron you have until May 1, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. To obtain additional information, contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email [email protected], by telephone at 212.425.1140, or visit http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-sa/chicago-bridge-iron-company-n-v. Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced attorney that has represented investors in securities litigations involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
CONTACT:
Vincent Wong, Esq.
39 East Broadway
Suite 304
New York, NY 10002
Tel. 212.425.1140
Fax. 866.699.3880
E-Mail: [email protected]

Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward PE Ratio 7.13
CBI's Forward PE Ratio is ranked higher than
96% of the 168 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 17.06 vs. CBI: 7.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PB Ratio 2.17
CBI's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
71% of the 1003 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.32 vs. CBI: 2.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
CBI' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.77  Med: 2.89 Max: 8.23
Current: 2.17
0.77
8.23
PS Ratio 0.29
CBI's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
78% of the 982 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.65 vs. CBI: 0.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
CBI' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.08  Med: 0.72 Max: 1.37
Current: 0.29
0.08
1.37
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 5.30
CBI's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
76% of the 352 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 11.14 vs. CBI: 5.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
CBI' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.85  Med: 10.75 Max: 306.03
Current: 5.3
2.85
306.03
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 4.85
CBI's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
73% of the 448 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 9.07 vs. CBI: 4.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
CBI' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.85  Med: 9.77 Max: 171.34
Current: 4.85
1.85
171.34
EV-to-EBIT -37.92
CBI's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 1022 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 11.82 vs. CBI: -37.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
CBI' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -168.5  Med: 9.5 Max: 357.5
Current: -37.92
-168.5
357.5
EV-to-EBITDA -532.65
CBI's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 1058 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 9.37 vs. CBI: -532.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
CBI' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -584.7  Med: 8.2 Max: 71.4
Current: -532.65
-584.7
71.4
Shiller PE Ratio 22.55
CBI's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked lower than
56% of the 168 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 20.34 vs. CBI: 22.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
CBI' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.19  Med: 31.91 Max: 112.45
Current: 22.55
9.19
112.45
Current Ratio 0.56
CBI's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
97% of the 957 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.48 vs. CBI: 0.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
CBI' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.56  Med: 1.15 Max: 1.75
Current: 0.56
0.56
1.75
Quick Ratio 0.52
CBI's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
94% of the 957 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.29 vs. CBI: 0.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
CBI' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.52  Med: 1.15 Max: 1.75
Current: 0.52
0.52
1.75
Days Inventory 9.53
CBI's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
72% of the 840 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 25.59 vs. CBI: 9.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
CBI' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.23  Med: 9.15 Max: 9.53
Current: 9.53
1.23
9.53
Days Sales Outstanding 24.87
CBI's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
86% of the 742 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 72.76 vs. CBI: 24.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
CBI' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 24.87  Med: 37.93 Max: 53.25
Current: 24.87
24.87
53.25
Days Payable 41.80
CBI's Days Payable is ranked lower than
71% of the 657 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 82.51 vs. CBI: 41.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
CBI' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 37.15  Med: 42.52 Max: 50.18
Current: 41.8
37.15
50.18

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 0.91
CBI's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
87% of the 1096 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.38 vs. CBI: 0.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
CBI' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.12  Med: 0.47 Max: 2.8
Current: 0.91
0.12
2.8
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 11.90
CBI's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked higher than
61% of the 480 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 6.60 vs. CBI: 11.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
CBI' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 9.8 Max: 74.7
Current: 11.9
0
74.7
Forward Dividend Yield % 0.93
CBI's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
88% of the 1068 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.50 vs. CBI: 0.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 1.45
CBI's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
78% of the 1369 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.90 vs. CBI: 1.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
CBI' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.18  Med: 0.72 Max: 4.31
Current: 1.45
0.18
4.31
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 2.30
CBI's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
92% of the 497 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: -2.30 vs. CBI: 2.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
CBI' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -29.2  Med: -2.1 Max: 6.4
Current: 2.3
-29.2
6.4

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 0.93
CBI's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
63% of the 472 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.17 vs. CBI: 0.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
CBI' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.33  Med: 1.26 Max: 2.85
Current: 0.93
0.33
2.85
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.41
CBI's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
95% of the 840 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.15 vs. CBI: 0.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
CBI' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.23  Med: 0.79 Max: 1.86
Current: 0.41
0.23
1.86
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % -2.64
CBI's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
86% of the 1251 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 6.84 vs. CBI: -2.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
CBI' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.65  Med: 9.3 Max: 33.5
Current: -2.64
-2.65
33.5
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 15.26
CBI's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
65% of the 495 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 7.44 vs. CBI: 15.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
CBI' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.4  Med: 26.85 Max: 43.4
Current: 15.26
4.4
43.4

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $10,680
EPS (TTM) $ -3.07
Beta2.10
Short Percentage of Float8.26%
52-Week Range $26.12 - 41.33
Shares Outstanding (Mil)100.67

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 10,223 10,262 9,584
EPS ($) 4.30 4.56 8.59
EPS without NRI ($) 4.30 4.56 8.59
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
22.27%
Dividends per Share ($) 0.29 0.29 0.21
» More Articles for CBI

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
CB&I Schedules Conference Call and Webcast for May 8 Apr 24 2017 
SHAREHOLDER NOTICE: Lundin Law PC Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Chicago Bridge & Apr 21 2017 
CHICAGO BRIDGE SHAREHOLDER ALERT BY FORMER LOUISIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL: KAHN SWICK & FOTI, LLC REMIND Apr 21 2017 
CB&I Announces Additional Technology Award for ZPC's Refinery in China Apr 19 2017 
CBI Investor Deadline Reminder: Hagens Berman Reminds Investors in Chicago Bridge & Iron Company of Apr 17 2017 
The Klein Law Firm Announces a Class Action Filed on Behalf of CBI Shareholders and a Lead Plaintiff Apr 10 2017 
CB&I Announces Multiple Petrochemical Technology Awards in China Apr 06 2017 
Lifshitz & Miller LLP Announces Investigation of Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V., JBS S.A., Tempu Apr 05 2017 
IMPORTANT INVESTOR ALERT: Lundin Law PC Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Chicago Br Apr 05 2017 
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Brower Piven Encourages Investors Who Have Losses In Excess Of $100,000 From Inve Apr 04 2017 

More From Other Websites
CB&I Schedules Conference Call and Webcast for May 8 Apr 24 2017
3 Top Infrastructure Stocks to Buy in 2017 Apr 22 2017
SHAREHOLDER NOTICE: Lundin Law PC Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Chicago Bridge &... Apr 21 2017
CHICAGO BRIDGE SHAREHOLDER ALERT BY FORMER LOUISIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL: KAHN SWICK & FOTI, LLC... Apr 21 2017
EQUITY ALERT: Khang & Khang LLP Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Chicago Bridge &... Apr 21 2017
May 1 Deadline Alert: Law Offices of Howard G. Smith Reminds Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V.... Apr 21 2017
APPROACHING DEADLINE: Lundin Law PC Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Chicago Bridge... Apr 20 2017
CBI ALERT: Levi & Korsinsky Reminds Investors It Has Filed a Complaint on Behalf of Chicago Bridge &... Apr 20 2017
DEADLINE ALERT: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against Chicago... Apr 20 2017
CBI INVESTOR ALERT: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong Reminds Investors of Chicago Bridge & Iron... Apr 19 2017
CB&I Announces Additional Technology Award for ZPC's Refinery in China Apr 19 2017
Construction Stocks' Q1 Earnings Slated for Apr 19: URI, CBI Apr 18 2017
INVESTOR ALERT: Khang & Khang LLP Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Chicago Bridge &... Apr 15 2017
KAHN SWICK & FOTI, LLC REMINDS INVESTORS of Lead Plaintiff Deadline in Lawsuit Against Chicago... Apr 14 2017
Levi & Korsinsky Reminds Investors It Has Filed a Complaint on Behalf of Chicago Bridge & Iron... Apr 14 2017
IMPORTANT EQUITY ALERT: Lundin Law PC Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Chicago... Apr 13 2017
The Klein Law Firm Announces the Commencement of a Class Action on Behalf of CBI Shareholders and a... Apr 13 2017
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against... Apr 13 2017
INVESTOR ALERT: Goldberg Law PC Announces an Investigation of Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. and... Apr 10 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)