Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.25
CHK's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
61% of the 508 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.60 vs. CHK: 0.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
CHK' s 10-Year Cash to Debt Range
Min: 0  Med: 0.05 Max: 0.62
Current: 0.25
0
0.62
Equity to Asset 0.38
CHK's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
72% of the 477 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.54 vs. CHK: 0.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
CHK' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: -0.33  Med: 0.37 Max: 0.56
Current: 0.38
-0.33
0.56
Interest Coverage 39.07
CHK's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
52% of the 325 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 30.48 vs. CHK: 39.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
CHK' s 10-Year Interest Coverage Range
Min: 1.32  Med: 5.66 Max: 147.63
Current: 39.07
1.32
147.63
F-Score: 5
Z-Score: 0.42
M-Score: -4.31
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) -12.30
CHK's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
53% of the 493 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -7.19 vs. CHK: -12.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
CHK' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: -226.54  Med: 30.11 Max: 53.69
Current: -12.3
-226.54
53.69
Net-margin (%) -12.03
CHK's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
51% of the 494 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -13.66 vs. CHK: -12.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
CHK' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: -247.09  Med: 15.52 Max: 72.55
Current: -12.03
-247.09
72.55
ROE (%) -14.24
CHK's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
60% of the 536 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -8.18 vs. CHK: -14.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
CHK' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: -4872.45  Med: 12.03 Max: 952.2
Current: -14.24
-4872.45
952.2
ROA (%) -5.63
CHK's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
52% of the 571 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -5.19 vs. CHK: -5.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
CHK' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: -106.02  Med: 4.65 Max: 39.77
Current: -5.63
-106.02
39.77
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) -7.41
CHK's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
50% of the 553 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -7.40 vs. CHK: -7.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
CHK' s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: -131.11  Med: 9.83 Max: 39.03
Current: -7.41
-131.11
39.03
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 20.60
CHK's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
74% of the 345 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 6.50 vs. CHK: 20.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CHK' s 10-Year Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: -10.2  Med: 16.40 Max: 50
Current: 20.6
-10.2
50
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 7.60
CHK's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
59% of the 305 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -0.90 vs. CHK: 7.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CHK' s 10-Year EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: -13.1  Med: 7.55 Max: 45.9
Current: 7.6
-13.1
45.9
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) -7.60
CHK's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
57% of the 272 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.40 vs. CHK: -7.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CHK' s 10-Year EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: -46.5  Med: -2.20 Max: 141.7
Current: -7.6
-46.5
141.7
» CHK's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2014

CHK Guru Trades in Q2 2014

Ken Fisher 7,853 sh (New)
George Soros 35,400 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 20,832 sh (New)
Jim Simons 4,567,500 sh (+164.19%)
Paul Tudor Jones 27,583 sh (+46.72%)
Richard Snow 2,210,615 sh (+8.79%)
John Buckingham 111,002 sh (+1.55%)
Louis Moore Bacon 200,000 sh (unchged)
Carl Icahn 66,450,000 sh (unchged)
John Rogers 220,785 sh (unchged)
George Soros 675,000 sh (unchged)
Bruce Berkowitz Sold Out
Charles Brandes 6,846,535 sh (-1.87%)
Mason Hawkins 64,304,516 sh (-5.93%)
Ray Dalio 326,988 sh (-14.91%)
Murray Stahl 25,184 sh (-20.85%)
David Dreman 75,065 sh (-27.11%)
Arnold Schneider 599,287 sh (-31.36%)
Mohnish Pabrai 668,000 sh (-79.53%)
» More
Q3 2014

CHK Guru Trades in Q3 2014

Steven Cohen 506,600 sh (New)
Bruce Berkowitz 536,900 sh (New)
Murray Stahl 34,051 sh (+35.21%)
David Dreman 84,330 sh (+12.34%)
Richard Snow 2,332,441 sh (+5.51%)
Arnold Schneider 615,943 sh (+2.78%)
John Buckingham 112,835 sh (+1.65%)
Carl Icahn 66,450,000 sh (unchged)
John Rogers 220,785 sh (unchged)
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
George Soros Sold Out
Mohnish Pabrai Sold Out
Ken Fisher Sold Out
Mason Hawkins 62,800,076 sh (-2.34%)
Charles Brandes 6,657,547 sh (-2.76%)
Ray Dalio 196,188 sh (-40.00%)
Jim Simons 2,313,800 sh (-49.34%)
Paul Tudor Jones 10,794 sh (-60.87%)
» More
Q4 2014

CHK Guru Trades in Q4 2014

Bill Nygren 11,000,000 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 2,891,027 sh (+470.67%)
Richard Snow 3,390,937 sh (+45.38%)
Murray Stahl 46,132 sh (+35.48%)
Ray Dalio 257,156 sh (+31.08%)
Arnold Schneider 796,117 sh (+29.25%)
Mason Hawkins 73,868,067 sh (+17.62%)
Charles Brandes 7,757,535 sh (+16.52%)
John Rogers 220,785 sh (unchged)
Carl Icahn 66,450,000 sh (unchged)
Bruce Berkowitz Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
John Buckingham 111,285 sh (-1.37%)
David Dreman 78,315 sh (-7.13%)
» More
Q1 2015

CHK Guru Trades in Q1 2015

Paul Tudor Jones 26,500 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 116,433 sh (New)
Arnold Schneider 2,478,109 sh (+211.27%)
Ray Dalio 448,363 sh (+74.35%)
Murray Stahl 59,973 sh (+30.00%)
Charles Brandes 9,706,338 sh (+25.12%)
Carl Icahn 73,050,000 sh (+9.93%)
Richard Snow 3,720,428 sh (+9.72%)
Bill Nygren 12,000,000 sh (+9.09%)
Carl Icahn 73,050,000 sh (+9.93%)
John Rogers 220,785 sh (unchged)
John Buckingham 110,837 sh (-0.40%)
Mason Hawkins 64,200,477 sh (-13.09%)
Steven Cohen 1,748,300 sh (-39.53%)
David Dreman 37,705 sh (-51.85%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CHK

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Preferred stocks of Chesapeake Energy Corp

SymbolPriceYieldDescription
CHKDG70.256.99
CHKVZ910.006.32
CHKDH80.507.53
CHKPRD74.186.254.50% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock
CHKDP680.008.335 3/4 % Pfd Shs
CHKDJ1030.005.585 3/4 % Cum Non-Voting Conv Pfd Shs Reg-S
4GGB.Singapore0.000.005 3/4 % Conv Pfd Shs Series -A- -144A-
4GJB.Singapore0.000.005 3/4 % Cum Non-Voting Conv Pfd Shs Reg-S
CHKVP720.008.245 3/4 % Cum Conv Pfd Shs Series -A-
CKRGZ0.000.005 3/4 % Pfd Shs -144A
CHKWZ0.000.005 3/4 % Conv Pfd Shs Series -A- -144A-

Guru Investment Theses on Chesapeake Energy Corp

Mason Hawkins Comments on Chesapeake Energy Corp - May 28, 2015

The largest detractor in the quarter was Chesapeake Energy (CHK), one of the largest producers of natural gas, natural gas liquids, and oil in the U.S., which declined 27%. The company reported lower-than- expected price realizations and production in the fourth quarter. While the company cut 2015 budgeted capital expenditures (capex) over 40% versus 2014, the market was hoping for Chesapeake to balance lower cash flow with capex. The company maintains a flexible balance sheet, with $4 billion in cash and an additional $4 billion in an undrawn credit facility, which will allow CEO Doug Lawler to focus on driving the greatest value for shareholders for the long-term, either through the authorized $1 billion repurchase program, strategic acquisitions, or a combination of both. While our appraisal of the company has come down in the short-term with the collapse of oil and gas prices, the long-term thesis remains intact. Chesapeake’s second largest shareholder, Carl Icahn (Trades, Portfolio), recently increased his stake in Chesapeake by 10%, and Chairman Archie Dunham bought an additional $14 million at quarter-end. During the quarter we maintained our overall exposure to Chesapeake but switched half our position into options due to favorable pricing created by the panic and resulting volatility in energy markets. We also employed this approach to increase our exposure to Murphy. We viewed this as a rare opportunity to gain more downside protection while maintaining the upside benefit of higher stock prices. The Chesapeake options accounted for more than half of that position’s decline in the quarter.

From Mason Hawkins (Trades, Portfolio)’ Longleaf Partners Fund Q1 2015 Management Discussion.

Check out Mason Hawkins latest stock trades

Mason Hawkins Comments on Chesapeake - Feb 11, 2015

Chesapeake (CHK) declined 21% for the full year and 14% in the fourth quarter. Since Chesapeake’s heavily vested Board took over in mid-2012, the company has delivered the balance sheet and improved production from its irreplaceable 12 +million net acres of oil and gas fields. CEO Doug Lawler is driving value recognition in ways he can control – selling assets at reasonable prices, reducing debt, and increasing operating efficiencies in both corporate and production activity. In the first half of the year, Chesapeake sold non-core acreage in Oklahoma, Texas, and Pennsylvania and spun-off its oilfield services business into Seventy-Seven Energy, which we sold. In the fourth quarter, Chesapeake closed the sale of Marcellus and Utica assets to Southwestern Energy for $5 billion. This amounted to roughly 8% of Chesapeake’s production for nearly half its market cap. Management announced plans to use $1 billion of the proceeds to repurchase the heavily discounted shares.

From Mason Hawkins (Trades, Portfolio)’ Longleaf Partners Fund Q4 2014 Management Discussion.

Check out Mason Hawkins latest stock trades

Bill Nygren Comments on Chesapeake Energy - Jan 09, 2015

Chesapeake Energy (CHK - $19.57)

Chesapeake Energy is one of the largest oil and natural gas producers in the United States. The company has a storied history. Since its founding in 1989, it grew rapidly by acquiring acreage positions across North America’s largest resource plays. In our view, this growth left the company flush with high-quality assets, but financially overextended and operationally inefficient. During the past two years, the board of directors and the executive management team were replaced with new, shareholder-oriented leaders. This team began overhauling Chesapeake quickly by reducing leverage, simplifying the company’s financial structure and refocusing capital allocation on the highest return uses. In the past 18 months, Chesapeake has managed to spin off its non-core oilfield services business, sell billions of dollars of assets to reduce leverage, cut its capital spending budget by two-thirds and reduce general and administrative expenses by half. We believe these actions show that management’s focus has shifted away from acreage growth and toward maximizing shareholder returns. Chesapeake’s shares are trading at less than the company’s book value and at just 11x earnings per share. We see this as a bargain price for such high quality oil and gas assets run by what we believe is a strong, shareholder-friendly management team.



From Bill Nygren (Trades, Portfolio)'s Oakmark Fund – 4Q 2014 Letter.





Another way we seek to capture losses is to replace losing stocks with similar, but equally attractive, stocks. An example in the Oakmark Fund from this past quarter was selling our remaining Cenovus (CVE) shares and redeploying the proceeds into Chesapeake (CHK). We believe Cenovus is a fine, well-managed company, but due to rapidly declining oil prices, it had fallen beneath our purchase price. Another company we believed was also fine and well-managed, Chesapeake, had fallen to a price where it appeared to us to be more attractive than Cenovus. So even though Cenovus was far beneath our sell target, we captured the loss, increased our exposure to an energy sector we thought was cheap and switched to a stock we believed was somewhat more attractive.



From Bill Nygren's 4Q 2014 Market Commentary.



Check out Bill Nygren latest stock trades

Mason Hawkins Comments on Chesapeake - Oct 20, 2014

Our appraisals of our three energy-related holdings did not fall in spite of large stock declines, because our models already incorporated lower commodity prices based on the futures curve pricing and the marginal cost of production in our various plays. Chesapeake (CHK) fell 20% in the quarter. While costs declined, capex remained on plan, and the company moved production estimates up slightly. During the two year tenure of the new board, balance sheet leverage has been reduced by $6 billion, primarily from noncore asset sales. CEO Doug Lawler is driving value recognition in ways he can control and is building additional upside with the $2–3 billion of annual discretionary capital spending that management projects should deliver strong returns on capital, even without higher commodity prices. The company’s 4.8 million net developed acres and 7.5 million undeveloped acres of oil and gas fields cannot be replicated.

From Mason Hawkins (Trades, Portfolio)’ Longleaf Partners Q3 2014 Management Discussion.

Check out Mason Hawkins latest stock trades

Longleaf Partners Fund Comments on Chesapeake - Jul 24, 2014

The biggest performance drivers in the quarter were among the companies that contributed most to YTD gains. Chesapeake (CHK), the U.S. oil and gas exploration and production company, rose 22% in the quarter and was up 15% YTD. During the quarter, the company announced better-than-expected production and realizations and raised yearly guidance on both of these metrics. Management continued to execute on the capital efficiency strategy, highlighted by the spin-off at quarter-end of its oilfield services business into a publicly traded company called Seventy Seven Energy. The spin-off eliminated approximately $1.5 billion of net debt from Chesapeake’s balance sheet. Divestitures of noncore acreage in Oklahoma, Texas, and Pennsylvania were also completed. Our CEO partner, Doug Lawler, is positioning the company to focus on its strong assets in the Eagle Ford, Marcellus and Utica plays, while growing production profitably and keeping capital expenditures within cash flow.

From Mason Hawkins (Trades, Portfolio)’ Longleaf Partners Fund Semi Annual 2014 Management Discussion.

Check out Mason Hawkins latest stock trades

Mason Hawkins Comments on Chesapeake Energy - Feb 17, 2014

Chesapeake Energy (CHK) was the largest contributor in 2013, up 59%. Together with new CEO Doug Lawler, the board that we helped seat in 2012 is instilling financial and operating discipline into the company. Over the last 19 months, the company reduced SG&A, sold a number of non- core assets, decreased capex, and committed to living within its cash flow in 2014. The company is focusing on its strong assets in the Eagle Ford, Marcellus, and Utica plays in order to grow production profitably. Even after the stock's gains, Chesapeake's oil and gas reserves sell for a discount to our appraisal. That appraisal would grow significantly in the long-term bull case for low cost natural gas replacing coal for power generation, fostering manufacturing renewal in the U.S., displacing some oil as a transportation fuel, and becoming a major export.



From Mason Hawkins (Trades, Portfolio)' 2013 Partners Fund management discussion.

Check out Mason Hawkins latest stock trades

Mason Hawkins Comments on Chesapeake - Aug 13, 2013

Our participation in overhauling the Chesapeake (CHK) board last year is paying off. The stock has gained 23% YTD and is the Fund's largest holding. During the second quarter, Doug Lawler, who was formerly a Senior Vice President and on the Executive Committee at Anadarko Petroleum, became CEO of CHK. His compensation aligns his interests with shareholders. He is committed to increasing oil production, lowering operating costs, and reducing debt to extract value from CHK's strong set of assets.

From Mason Hawkins' semi-annual 2013 report.
Check out Mason Hawkins latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Chesapeake Energy Corp

Mason Hawkins Comments on Chesapeake Energy Corp
The largest detractor in the quarter was Chesapeake Energy (CHK), one of the largest producers of natural gas, natural gas liquids, and oil in the U.S., which declined 27%. The company reported lower-than- expected price realizations and production in the fourth quarter. While the company cut 2015 budgeted capital expenditures (capex) over 40% versus 2014, the market was hoping for Chesapeake to balance lower cash flow with capex. The company maintains a flexible balance sheet, with $4 billion in cash and an additional $4 billion in an undrawn credit facility, which will allow CEO Doug Lawler to focus on driving the greatest value for shareholders for the long-term, either through the authorized $1 billion repurchase program, strategic acquisitions, or a combination of both. While our appraisal of the company has come down in the short-term with the collapse of oil and gas prices, the long-term thesis remains intact. Chesapeake’s second largest shareholder, Carl Icahn (Trades, Portfolio), Read more...
Carl Icahn Increases Two of His Largest Stakes
In the closing days of March, guru Carl Icahn (Trades, Portfolio) shored up two of his largest stakes. One, in fact – Federal-Mogul Holdings Corp (FDML) – is the largest in his portfolio. Read more...
Bill Nygren Buys, Comments on 2 Stocks in Q4
Bill Nygren (Trades, Portfolio) manages the Oakmark Fund, which focuses on large-cap stocks in the U.S. It has returned 13.27% annualized since inception in 1991, compared to 9.65% for the S&P 500 benchmark index. Read more...
Bill Nygren Buys 2 New Stocks in Q4
Bill Nygren (Trades, Portfolio) is the manager of the Oakmark Fund, Select Fund, and Global Select Fund. In 2001, Morningstar named him the Domestic Stock Manager of the Year. Read more...
Mason Hawkins Comments on Chesapeake
Chesapeake (CHK) declined 21% for the full year and 14% in the fourth quarter. Since Chesapeake’s heavily vested Board took over in mid-2012, the company has delivered the balance sheet and improved production from its irreplaceable 12 +million net acres of oil and gas fields. CEO Doug Lawler is driving value recognition in ways he can control – selling assets at reasonable prices, reducing debt, and increasing operating efficiencies in both corporate and production activity. In the first half of the year, Chesapeake sold non-core acreage in Oklahoma, Texas, and Pennsylvania and spun-off its oilfield services business into Seventy-Seven Energy, which we sold. In the fourth quarter, Chesapeake closed the sale of Marcellus and Utica assets to Southwestern Energy for $5 billion. This amounted to roughly 8% of Chesapeake’s production for nearly half its market cap. Management announced plans to use $1 billion of the proceeds to repurchase the heavily discounted shares. Read more...
Bill Nygren Comments on Chesapeake Energy
Chesapeake Energy (CHK - $19.57)
Read more...
Mason Hawkins Comments on Chesapeake
Our appraisals of our three energy-related holdings did not fall in spite of large stock declines, because our models already incorporated lower commodity prices based on the futures curve pricing and the marginal cost of production in our various plays. Chesapeake (CHK) fell 20% in the quarter. While costs declined, capex remained on plan, and the company moved production estimates up slightly. During the two year tenure of the new board, balance sheet leverage has been reduced by $6 billion, primarily from noncore asset sales. CEO Doug Lawler is driving value recognition in ways he can control and is building additional upside with the $2–3 billion of annual discretionary capital spending that management projects should deliver strong returns on capital, even without higher commodity prices. The company’s 4.8 million net developed acres and 7.5 million undeveloped acres of oil and gas fields cannot be replicated. Read more...
Longleaf Partners Fund Comments on Chesapeake
The biggest performance drivers in the quarter were among the companies that contributed most to YTD gains. Chesapeake (CHK), the U.S. oil and gas exploration and production company, rose 22% in the quarter and was up 15% YTD. During the quarter, the company announced better-than-expected production and realizations and raised yearly guidance on both of these metrics. Management continued to execute on the capital efficiency strategy, highlighted by the spin-off at quarter-end of its oilfield services business into a publicly traded company called Seventy Seven Energy. The spin-off eliminated approximately $1.5 billion of net debt from Chesapeake’s balance sheet. Divestitures of noncore acreage in Oklahoma, Texas, and Pennsylvania were also completed. Our CEO partner, Doug Lawler, is positioning the company to focus on its strong assets in the Eagle Ford, Marcellus and Utica plays, while growing production profitably and keeping capital expenditures within cash flow. Read more...
Longleaf Partners Fund Semi Annual 2014 Management Discussion
Longleaf Partners Fund returned 6.8% in the second quarter, outpacing the S&P 500’s return of 5.2%. The Fund slightly trailed the Index year-to-date (YTD), with the performance of each rounding to 7.1%. The Partners Fund remained ahead of the Index as well as our absolute return goal of inflation plus 10% in the trailing year, despite our elevated cash position. Read more...
Seventy Seven Energy's High Debt Load Makes It An "Avoid"
Seventy Seven Energy was up yesterday in a down market with the news that Carl Icahn (Trades, Portfolio) has a 9.97 percent stake in the company. He merely received the shares as a spin-off and did not actively purchase the shares. Many spin-offs have had great performances over the years, so I wanted to see if Seventy Seven’s stock fit the characteristics of a successful spinoff. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/B 0.74
CHK's P/B is ranked higher than
62% of the 535 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.97 vs. CHK: 0.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
CHK' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 0.39  Med: 1.32 Max: 3.7
Current: 0.74
0.39
3.7
P/S 0.44
CHK's P/S is ranked higher than
90% of the 487 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.00 vs. CHK: 0.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
CHK' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 0.43  Med: 1.64 Max: 5.42
Current: 0.44
0.43
5.42
POCF 2.17
CHK's POCF is ranked higher than
74% of the 346 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 4.00 vs. CHK: 2.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
CHK' s 10-Year POCF Range
Min: 1.08  Med: 3.39 Max: 6.25
Current: 2.17
1.08
6.25
Current Ratio 1.01
CHK's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
59% of the 549 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.25 vs. CHK: 1.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
CHK' s 10-Year Current Ratio Range
Min: 0.44  Med: 0.82 Max: 3.11
Current: 1.01
0.44
3.11
Quick Ratio 1.01
CHK's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
57% of the 549 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.21 vs. CHK: 1.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
CHK' s 10-Year Quick Ratio Range
Min: 0.41  Med: 0.81 Max: 3.05
Current: 1.01
0.41
3.05
Days Sales Outstanding 32.13
CHK's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
62% of the 444 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 40.25 vs. CHK: 32.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
CHK' s 10-Year Days Sales Outstanding Range
Min: 26.44  Med: 59.26 Max: 229.1
Current: 32.13
26.44
229.1

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 3.13
CHK's Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
65% of the 371 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 4.04 vs. CHK: 3.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
CHK' s 10-Year Dividend Yield Range
Min: 0.44  Med: 1.21 Max: 3.15
Current: 3.13
0.44
3.15
Dividend Payout 0.21
CHK's Dividend Payout is ranked higher than
84% of the 159 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.64 vs. CHK: 0.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout only.
CHK' s 10-Year Dividend Payout Range
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.12 Max: 4.4
Current: 0.21
0.01
4.4
Dividend growth (3y) 11.90
CHK's Dividend growth (3y) is ranked higher than
69% of the 86 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 4.00 vs. CHK: 11.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend growth (3y) only.
CHK' s 10-Year Dividend growth (3y) Range
Min: 0  Med: 4.50 Max: 48.1
Current: 11.9
0
48.1
Yield on cost (5-Year) 3.92
CHK's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked lower than
56% of the 381 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 4.49 vs. CHK: 3.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
CHK' s 10-Year Yield on cost (5-Year) Range
Min: 0.55  Med: 1.52 Max: 3.94
Current: 3.92
0.55
3.94
Share Buyback Rate -0.90
CHK's Share Buyback Rate is ranked higher than
76% of the 405 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -7.40 vs. CHK: -0.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Share Buyback Rate only.
CHK' s 10-Year Share Buyback Rate Range
Min: 2.6  Med: -16.80 Max: -32.1
Current: -0.9

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 0.74
CHK's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
65% of the 498 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.04 vs. CHK: 0.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
CHK' s 10-Year Price/Tangible Book Range
Min: 0.56  Med: 1.60 Max: 12.05
Current: 0.74
0.56
12.05
Price/Median PS Value 0.27
CHK's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
78% of the 429 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. CHK: 0.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
CHK' s 10-Year Price/Median PS Value Range
Min: 0.14  Med: 1.03 Max: 6.95
Current: 0.27
0.14
6.95
Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value 1.47
CHK's Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value is ranked lower than
1290% of the 48 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.99 vs. CHK: 1.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value only.
CHK' s 10-Year Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value Range
Min: 0.25  Med: 0.94 Max: 3.47
Current: 1.47
0.25
3.47
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) -12.40
CHK's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
65% of the 569 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -3.70 vs. CHK: -12.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
CHK' s 10-Year Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: -12.46  Med: 9.00 Max: 15.6
Current: -12.4
-12.46
15.6
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) -82.01
CHK's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked lower than
89% of the 190 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -4.89 vs. CHK: -82.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
CHK' s 10-Year Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range
Min: -76.1  Med: -24.45 Max: 45.5
Current: -82.01
-76.1
45.5

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - E&P » Oil & Gas E&P
Compare:OJSCY, APC, APA, HRTPY, SGTZY » details
Traded in other countries:CHKDG.USA, CHKVZ.USA, CHKDH.USA, CHKDP.USA, CHKDJ.USA, CHKVP.USA, CS1.Germany, CHK.Mexico,
Chesapeake Energy Corp was incorporated in Oklahoma in 1989. The Company is a natural gas and oil exploration and production Company engaged in the exploration, development and acquisition of properties for the production of natural gas and crude oil from underground reservoirs and it provides marketing and midstream services. The Company operates in three segments which are managed separately because of the nature of its products and services. Its segments includes; exploration and production; marketing, gathering and compression; and oilfield services. The Company's exploration and production operating segment is responsible for finding and producing natural gas, oil and NGL; it's marketing, gathering and compression operating segment is responsible for marketing, gathering and compression of natural gas, oil and NGL; and its oilfield services operating segment is responsible for drilling, oilfield trucking, oilfield rentals, hydraulic fracturing and other oilfield services operations for both Chesapeake-operated wells and wells operated by third parties. The Company focuses its exploration, development, acquisition and production efforts in the two geographic operating divisions; Southern division and Northern Division. The Company's Southern Division includes the Eagle Ford Shale in South Texas, the Granite Wash/Hogshooter, Cleveland, Tonkawa and Mississippi Lime plays in the Anadarko Basin in northwestern Oklahoma, the Texas Panhandle and southern Kansas, the Haynesville/Bossier Shale in northwestern Louisiana and East Texas and the Barnett Shale in the Fort Worth Basin in north-central Texas. Its Northern Division includes the Utica Shale in Ohio, West Virginia and Pennsylvania, the Marcellus Shale in the northern Appalachian Basin in West Virginia and Pennsylvania and the Niobrara Shale in the Powder River Basin in Wyoming. At December 31, 2014, the Company had interests in approximately 45,100 gross productive wells, including properties in which it held an overriding royalty interest. It competes with both integrated and other independent natural gas and oil companies in acquiring desirable leasehold acreage, producing properties and the equipment and expertise necessary to explore, develop and operate its properties and market its production. The Company's exploration and production operations are subject to various types of regulation at the U.S. federal, state and local levels. Such regulation includes requirements for permits to drill and to conduct other operations and for provision of financial assurances covering drilling and well operations.
» More Articles for CHK

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
SSE, Leveraged Chesapeake Spinoff Left In A Challenging Environment Jun 23 2015 
A Strong Option for Dividend Investors Jun 23 2015 
Robinhood Jun 18 2015 
Robinhood Jun 18 2015 
Avon, Energizer Top List of Most Widely-Held Mid-Caps Jun 18 2015 
Weekly 3-Year Low Highlights: GSK, TRP, NOV, CHK Jun 15 2015 
Rule 1 Jun 09 2015 
Rule 1 Jun 09 2015 
Rule 1 Jun 09 2015 
A Few Reasons Why Chesapeake Energy's Turnaround Is Possible Jun 08 2015 

More From Other Websites
Here Are the 10 Worst Performing S&P 500 Stocks in 2015 Jun 30 2015
3 Stocks, 3 trades: GCI, SYY & CHK Jun 29 2015
Don't Growl at Chesapeake Energy: Sterne Agee Sees 15% Upside Jun 29 2015
Chesapeake Energy (CHK) Stock Rallying After Two Notch Upgrade Jun 29 2015
Chesapeake upgraded to buy from underperform at Sterne Agee Jun 29 2015
Chesapeake Energy Gets Double-Notch Upgrade At Sterne Agee CRT; 'Issues Not Fatal' Jun 29 2015
Chesapeake Energy upgraded by Sterne Agee CRT Jun 29 2015
Large caps for the 2nd half Jun 26 2015
One Reason Chesapeake Energy (CHK) Stock Is Down Jun 26 2015
Oakmark's Nygren, FPA's Romick Like Bank Stocks, Split on Views for Oil Patch Jun 26 2015
Large cap plays for the second half Jun 26 2015
Where Oakmark's Nygren, FPA's Romick Are Finding Value Jun 25 2015
The 52-Week Low Club for Thursday Jun 25 2015
Chesapeake Slips to 52-Week Low on Weak Energy Prices - Analyst Blog Jun 25 2015
Chesapeake shares slump to 52-week low as energy stocks slide Jun 25 2015
Here's a Reason Chesapeake Energy (CHK) Stock is Lower Jun 25 2015
Oil Stocks: Small Changes Make a Big Difference Jun 25 2015
Is Your Shale-Oil Explorer Drilling Enough? Jun 24 2015
Chesapeake Energy (CHK) Stock Falls Amid Declining Oil Prices Jun 24 2015
Edited Transcript of CHK presentation 23-Jun-15 6:00pm GMT Jun 24 2015

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK