Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.18
CHK's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
64% of the 469 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.46 vs. CHK: 0.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
CHK' s 10-Year Cash to Debt Range
Min: 0  Med: 0.05 Max: 0.62
Current: 0.18
0
0.62
Equity to Asset 0.31
CHK's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
78% of the 458 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.53 vs. CHK: 0.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
CHK' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: -0.33  Med: 0.37 Max: 0.56
Current: 0.31
-0.33
0.56
Interest Coverage 39.07
CHK's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
55% of the 304 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 22.03 vs. CHK: 39.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
CHK' s 10-Year Interest Coverage Range
Min: 1.32  Med: 5.93 Max: 147.63
Current: 39.07
1.32
147.63
F-Score: 3
Z-Score: -0.61
M-Score: -5.92
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) -50.84
CHK's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
63% of the 475 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -14.83 vs. CHK: -50.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
CHK' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: -226.54  Med: 29.95 Max: 53.69
Current: -50.84
-226.54
53.69
Net-margin (%) -39.56
CHK's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
60% of the 475 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -19.13 vs. CHK: -39.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
CHK' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: -247.09  Med: 14.97 Max: 72.55
Current: -39.56
-247.09
72.55
ROE (%) -50.22
CHK's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
80% of the 512 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -9.52 vs. CHK: -50.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
CHK' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: -4935.46  Med: 9.85 Max: 934.47
Current: -50.22
-4935.46
934.47
ROA (%) -17.65
CHK's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
71% of the 536 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -6.41 vs. CHK: -17.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
CHK' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: -106.02  Med: 4.53 Max: 39.77
Current: -17.65
-106.02
39.77
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) -26.94
CHK's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
69% of the 522 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -8.72 vs. CHK: -26.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
CHK' s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: -131.11  Med: 9.64 Max: 39.03
Current: -26.94
-131.11
39.03
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 20.60
CHK's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
74% of the 340 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 6.50 vs. CHK: 20.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CHK' s 10-Year Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: -10.2  Med: 15.70 Max: 45.1
Current: 20.6
-10.2
45.1
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 7.60
CHK's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
59% of the 296 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -1.60 vs. CHK: 7.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CHK' s 10-Year EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: -13.1  Med: 7.55 Max: 45.9
Current: 7.6
-13.1
45.9
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) -7.60
CHK's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
57% of the 262 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -0.50 vs. CHK: -7.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CHK' s 10-Year EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: -46.5  Med: -2.20 Max: 141.7
Current: -7.6
-46.5
141.7
» CHK's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2014

CHK Guru Trades in Q3 2014

Bruce Berkowitz 536,900 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 506,600 sh (New)
Murray Stahl 34,051 sh (+35.21%)
David Dreman 84,330 sh (+12.34%)
Richard Snow 2,332,441 sh (+5.51%)
Arnold Schneider 615,943 sh (+2.78%)
John Buckingham 112,835 sh (+1.65%)
John Rogers 220,785 sh (unchged)
Carl Icahn 66,450,000 sh (unchged)
George Soros Sold Out
Ken Fisher Sold Out
Mohnish Pabrai Sold Out
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Mason Hawkins 62,800,076 sh (-2.34%)
Charles Brandes 6,657,547 sh (-2.76%)
Ray Dalio 196,188 sh (-40.00%)
Jim Simons 2,313,800 sh (-49.34%)
Paul Tudor Jones 10,794 sh (-60.87%)
» More
Q4 2014

CHK Guru Trades in Q4 2014

Bill Nygren 11,000,000 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 2,891,027 sh (+470.67%)
Richard Snow 3,390,937 sh (+45.38%)
Murray Stahl 46,132 sh (+35.48%)
Ray Dalio 257,156 sh (+31.08%)
Arnold Schneider 796,117 sh (+29.25%)
Mason Hawkins 73,868,067 sh (+17.62%)
Charles Brandes 7,757,535 sh (+16.52%)
John Rogers 220,785 sh (unchged)
Carl Icahn 66,450,000 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Bruce Berkowitz Sold Out
John Buckingham 111,285 sh (-1.37%)
David Dreman 78,315 sh (-7.13%)
» More
Q1 2015

CHK Guru Trades in Q1 2015

Joel Greenblatt 116,433 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 26,500 sh (New)
Arnold Schneider 2,478,109 sh (+211.27%)
Ray Dalio 448,363 sh (+74.35%)
Murray Stahl 59,973 sh (+30.00%)
Charles Brandes 9,706,338 sh (+25.12%)
Carl Icahn 73,050,000 sh (+9.93%)
Richard Snow 3,720,428 sh (+9.72%)
Bill Nygren 12,000,000 sh (+9.09%)
Carl Icahn 73,050,000 sh (+9.93%)
John Rogers 220,785 sh (unchged)
John Buckingham 110,837 sh (-0.40%)
Mason Hawkins 64,200,477 sh (-13.09%)
Steven Cohen 1,748,300 sh (-39.53%)
David Dreman 37,705 sh (-51.85%)
» More
Q2 2015

CHK Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Murray Stahl 78,151 sh (+30.31%)
Arnold Schneider 3,147,857 sh (+27.03%)
John Rogers 277,130 sh (+25.52%)
Paul Tudor Jones 32,200 sh (+21.51%)
Richard Snow 4,134,360 sh (+11.13%)
Charles Brandes 10,228,072 sh (+5.38%)
John Buckingham 111,565 sh (+0.66%)
Bill Nygren 12,000,000 sh (unchged)
Carl Icahn 73,050,000 sh (unchged)
George Soros 1,900,000 sh (unchged)
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Mason Hawkins 60,488,573 sh (-5.78%)
David Dreman 27,193 sh (-27.88%)
Ray Dalio 162,000 sh (-63.87%)
Steven Cohen 480,700 sh (-72.50%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CHK

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Preferred stocks of Chesapeake Energy Corp

SymbolPriceYieldDescription
CHKDG47.3010.57
CHKVZ448.7512.81
CHKDH73.6316.54
CHKPRD57.267.864.50% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock
CHKDP462.0012.465 3/4 % Pfd Shs
CHKDJ846.256.795 3/4 % Cum Non-Voting Conv Pfd Shs Reg-S
4GGB.Singapore0.000.005 3/4 % Conv Pfd Shs Series -A- -144A-
4GJB.Singapore0.000.005 3/4 % Cum Non-Voting Conv Pfd Shs Reg-S
CHKVP490.0011.735 3/4 % Cum Conv Pfd Shs Series -A-
CKRGZ0.000.005 3/4 % Pfd Shs -144A
CHKWZ0.000.005 3/4 % Conv Pfd Shs Series -A- -144A-

Guru Investment Theses on Chesapeake Energy Corp

Bill Nygren Comments on Chesapeake Energy Corp - Jul 09, 2015

Chesapeake Energy (CHK) has been a notably poor performer in 2015, down 42% since the start of the calendar year, and deserves further discussion. Every oil and gas producer has been hurt by the decline in commodity prices, but it has been particularly painful for Chesapeake. This is because Chesapeake has an unusually large fixed-cost base, which magnifies the impact falling revenue has on earnings. The outsized costs stem from onerous transportation contracts that require Chesapeake to pay a fixed-dollar amount to suppliers regardless of the volume of energy the company produces. Since a portion of these agreements cover assets that are not economical at today’s prices, Chesapeake’s high-return assets must now shoulder the full burden of these legacy costs as well as their own costs. At current commodity prices Chesapeake is losing money, and investors have become worried about the company’s liquidity.

We believe these issues are manageable, and we remain confident in the company’s ability to improve its earnings and liquidity. We believe Chesapeake’s huge scale will allow the company to sell a relatively small percentage of its future production in exchange for cash making up a relatively large percentage of the company’s current enterprise value. Such divestitures may take various forms (providing immediate cash, third party drilling capital, or simply reducing transportation burdens), but all would help resolve liquidity issues while also highlighting what we believe is the large disconnect between Chesapeake’s intrinsic value and its market price. Considering that Chesapeake’s Board of Directors looks at such decisions with the goal of maximizing value per share, we are comfortable that our investment is in good hands.

From Bill Nygren (Trades, Portfolio)'s Oakmark Select Fund Second Quarter 2015 Commentary.

Check out Bill Nygren latest stock trades

Mason Hawkins Comments on Chesapeake Energy Corp - May 28, 2015

The largest detractor in the quarter was Chesapeake Energy (CHK), one of the largest producers of natural gas, natural gas liquids, and oil in the U.S., which declined 27%. The company reported lower-than- expected price realizations and production in the fourth quarter. While the company cut 2015 budgeted capital expenditures (capex) over 40% versus 2014, the market was hoping for Chesapeake to balance lower cash flow with capex. The company maintains a flexible balance sheet, with $4 billion in cash and an additional $4 billion in an undrawn credit facility, which will allow CEO Doug Lawler to focus on driving the greatest value for shareholders for the long-term, either through the authorized $1 billion repurchase program, strategic acquisitions, or a combination of both. While our appraisal of the company has come down in the short-term with the collapse of oil and gas prices, the long-term thesis remains intact. Chesapeake’s second largest shareholder, Carl Icahn (Trades, Portfolio), recently increased his stake in Chesapeake by 10%, and Chairman Archie Dunham bought an additional $14 million at quarter-end. During the quarter we maintained our overall exposure to Chesapeake but switched half our position into options due to favorable pricing created by the panic and resulting volatility in energy markets. We also employed this approach to increase our exposure to Murphy. We viewed this as a rare opportunity to gain more downside protection while maintaining the upside benefit of higher stock prices. The Chesapeake options accounted for more than half of that position’s decline in the quarter.

From Mason Hawkins (Trades, Portfolio)’ Longleaf Partners Fund Q1 2015 Management Discussion.

Check out Mason Hawkins latest stock trades

Mason Hawkins Comments on Chesapeake - Feb 11, 2015

Chesapeake (CHK) declined 21% for the full year and 14% in the fourth quarter. Since Chesapeake’s heavily vested Board took over in mid-2012, the company has delivered the balance sheet and improved production from its irreplaceable 12 +million net acres of oil and gas fields. CEO Doug Lawler is driving value recognition in ways he can control – selling assets at reasonable prices, reducing debt, and increasing operating efficiencies in both corporate and production activity. In the first half of the year, Chesapeake sold non-core acreage in Oklahoma, Texas, and Pennsylvania and spun-off its oilfield services business into Seventy-Seven Energy, which we sold. In the fourth quarter, Chesapeake closed the sale of Marcellus and Utica assets to Southwestern Energy for $5 billion. This amounted to roughly 8% of Chesapeake’s production for nearly half its market cap. Management announced plans to use $1 billion of the proceeds to repurchase the heavily discounted shares.

From Mason Hawkins (Trades, Portfolio)’ Longleaf Partners Fund Q4 2014 Management Discussion.

Check out Mason Hawkins latest stock trades

Bill Nygren Comments on Chesapeake Energy - Jan 09, 2015

Chesapeake Energy (CHK - $19.57)

Chesapeake Energy is one of the largest oil and natural gas producers in the United States. The company has a storied history. Since its founding in 1989, it grew rapidly by acquiring acreage positions across North America’s largest resource plays. In our view, this growth left the company flush with high-quality assets, but financially overextended and operationally inefficient. During the past two years, the board of directors and the executive management team were replaced with new, shareholder-oriented leaders. This team began overhauling Chesapeake quickly by reducing leverage, simplifying the company’s financial structure and refocusing capital allocation on the highest return uses. In the past 18 months, Chesapeake has managed to spin off its non-core oilfield services business, sell billions of dollars of assets to reduce leverage, cut its capital spending budget by two-thirds and reduce general and administrative expenses by half. We believe these actions show that management’s focus has shifted away from acreage growth and toward maximizing shareholder returns. Chesapeake’s shares are trading at less than the company’s book value and at just 11x earnings per share. We see this as a bargain price for such high quality oil and gas assets run by what we believe is a strong, shareholder-friendly management team.



From Bill Nygren (Trades, Portfolio)'s Oakmark Fund – 4Q 2014 Letter.





Another way we seek to capture losses is to replace losing stocks with similar, but equally attractive, stocks. An example in the Oakmark Fund from this past quarter was selling our remaining Cenovus (CVE) shares and redeploying the proceeds into Chesapeake (CHK). We believe Cenovus is a fine, well-managed company, but due to rapidly declining oil prices, it had fallen beneath our purchase price. Another company we believed was also fine and well-managed, Chesapeake, had fallen to a price where it appeared to us to be more attractive than Cenovus. So even though Cenovus was far beneath our sell target, we captured the loss, increased our exposure to an energy sector we thought was cheap and switched to a stock we believed was somewhat more attractive.



From Bill Nygren's 4Q 2014 Market Commentary.



Check out Bill Nygren latest stock trades

Mason Hawkins Comments on Chesapeake - Oct 20, 2014

Our appraisals of our three energy-related holdings did not fall in spite of large stock declines, because our models already incorporated lower commodity prices based on the futures curve pricing and the marginal cost of production in our various plays. Chesapeake (CHK) fell 20% in the quarter. While costs declined, capex remained on plan, and the company moved production estimates up slightly. During the two year tenure of the new board, balance sheet leverage has been reduced by $6 billion, primarily from noncore asset sales. CEO Doug Lawler is driving value recognition in ways he can control and is building additional upside with the $2–3 billion of annual discretionary capital spending that management projects should deliver strong returns on capital, even without higher commodity prices. The company’s 4.8 million net developed acres and 7.5 million undeveloped acres of oil and gas fields cannot be replicated.

From Mason Hawkins (Trades, Portfolio)’ Longleaf Partners Q3 2014 Management Discussion.

Check out Mason Hawkins latest stock trades

Longleaf Partners Fund Comments on Chesapeake - Jul 24, 2014

The biggest performance drivers in the quarter were among the companies that contributed most to YTD gains. Chesapeake (CHK), the U.S. oil and gas exploration and production company, rose 22% in the quarter and was up 15% YTD. During the quarter, the company announced better-than-expected production and realizations and raised yearly guidance on both of these metrics. Management continued to execute on the capital efficiency strategy, highlighted by the spin-off at quarter-end of its oilfield services business into a publicly traded company called Seventy Seven Energy. The spin-off eliminated approximately $1.5 billion of net debt from Chesapeake’s balance sheet. Divestitures of noncore acreage in Oklahoma, Texas, and Pennsylvania were also completed. Our CEO partner, Doug Lawler, is positioning the company to focus on its strong assets in the Eagle Ford, Marcellus and Utica plays, while growing production profitably and keeping capital expenditures within cash flow.

From Mason Hawkins (Trades, Portfolio)’ Longleaf Partners Fund Semi Annual 2014 Management Discussion.

Check out Mason Hawkins latest stock trades

Mason Hawkins Comments on Chesapeake Energy - Feb 17, 2014

Chesapeake Energy (CHK) was the largest contributor in 2013, up 59%. Together with new CEO Doug Lawler, the board that we helped seat in 2012 is instilling financial and operating discipline into the company. Over the last 19 months, the company reduced SG&A, sold a number of non- core assets, decreased capex, and committed to living within its cash flow in 2014. The company is focusing on its strong assets in the Eagle Ford, Marcellus, and Utica plays in order to grow production profitably. Even after the stock's gains, Chesapeake's oil and gas reserves sell for a discount to our appraisal. That appraisal would grow significantly in the long-term bull case for low cost natural gas replacing coal for power generation, fostering manufacturing renewal in the U.S., displacing some oil as a transportation fuel, and becoming a major export.



From Mason Hawkins (Trades, Portfolio)' 2013 Partners Fund management discussion.

Check out Mason Hawkins latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Chesapeake Energy Corp

Bill Nygren Comments on Chesapeake Energy Corp
Chesapeake Energy (CHK) has been a notably poor performer in 2015, down 42% since the start of the calendar year, and deserves further discussion. Every oil and gas producer has been hurt by the decline in commodity prices, but it has been particularly painful for Chesapeake. This is because Chesapeake has an unusually large fixed-cost base, which magnifies the impact falling revenue has on earnings. The outsized costs stem from onerous transportation contracts that require Chesapeake to pay a fixed-dollar amount to suppliers regardless of the volume of energy the company produces. Since a portion of these agreements cover assets that are not economical at today’s prices, Chesapeake’s high-return assets must now shoulder the full burden of these legacy costs as well as their own costs. At current commodity prices Chesapeake is losing money, and investors have become worried about the company’s liquidity. Read more...
Mason Hawkins Comments on Chesapeake Energy Corp
The largest detractor in the quarter was Chesapeake Energy (CHK), one of the largest producers of natural gas, natural gas liquids, and oil in the U.S., which declined 27%. The company reported lower-than- expected price realizations and production in the fourth quarter. While the company cut 2015 budgeted capital expenditures (capex) over 40% versus 2014, the market was hoping for Chesapeake to balance lower cash flow with capex. The company maintains a flexible balance sheet, with $4 billion in cash and an additional $4 billion in an undrawn credit facility, which will allow CEO Doug Lawler to focus on driving the greatest value for shareholders for the long-term, either through the authorized $1 billion repurchase program, strategic acquisitions, or a combination of both. While our appraisal of the company has come down in the short-term with the collapse of oil and gas prices, the long-term thesis remains intact. Chesapeake’s second largest shareholder, Carl Icahn (Trades, Portfolio), Read more...
Carl Icahn Increases Two of His Largest Stakes
In the closing days of March, guru Carl Icahn (Trades, Portfolio) shored up two of his largest stakes. One, in fact – Federal-Mogul Holdings Corp (NASDAQ:FDML) – is the largest in his portfolio. Read more...
Bill Nygren Buys, Comments on 2 Stocks in Q4
Bill Nygren (Trades, Portfolio) manages the Oakmark Fund, which focuses on large-cap stocks in the U.S. It has returned 13.27% annualized since inception in 1991, compared to 9.65% for the S&P 500 benchmark index. Read more...
Bill Nygren Buys 2 New Stocks in Q4
Bill Nygren (Trades, Portfolio) is the manager of the Oakmark Fund, Select Fund, and Global Select Fund. In 2001, Morningstar named him the Domestic Stock Manager of the Year. Read more...
Mason Hawkins Comments on Chesapeake
Chesapeake (CHK) declined 21% for the full year and 14% in the fourth quarter. Since Chesapeake’s heavily vested Board took over in mid-2012, the company has delivered the balance sheet and improved production from its irreplaceable 12 +million net acres of oil and gas fields. CEO Doug Lawler is driving value recognition in ways he can control – selling assets at reasonable prices, reducing debt, and increasing operating efficiencies in both corporate and production activity. In the first half of the year, Chesapeake sold non-core acreage in Oklahoma, Texas, and Pennsylvania and spun-off its oilfield services business into Seventy-Seven Energy, which we sold. In the fourth quarter, Chesapeake closed the sale of Marcellus and Utica assets to Southwestern Energy for $5 billion. This amounted to roughly 8% of Chesapeake’s production for nearly half its market cap. Management announced plans to use $1 billion of the proceeds to repurchase the heavily discounted shares. Read more...
Bill Nygren Comments on Chesapeake Energy
Chesapeake Energy (CHK - $19.57)
Read more...
Mason Hawkins Comments on Chesapeake
Our appraisals of our three energy-related holdings did not fall in spite of large stock declines, because our models already incorporated lower commodity prices based on the futures curve pricing and the marginal cost of production in our various plays. Chesapeake (CHK) fell 20% in the quarter. While costs declined, capex remained on plan, and the company moved production estimates up slightly. During the two year tenure of the new board, balance sheet leverage has been reduced by $6 billion, primarily from noncore asset sales. CEO Doug Lawler is driving value recognition in ways he can control and is building additional upside with the $2–3 billion of annual discretionary capital spending that management projects should deliver strong returns on capital, even without higher commodity prices. The company’s 4.8 million net developed acres and 7.5 million undeveloped acres of oil and gas fields cannot be replicated. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/B 0.76
CHK's P/B is ranked lower than
54% of the 491 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.67 vs. CHK: 0.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
CHK' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 0.39  Med: 1.34 Max: 3.94
Current: 0.76
0.39
3.94
P/S 0.31
CHK's P/S is ranked higher than
90% of the 439 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.50 vs. CHK: 0.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
CHK' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 0.27  Med: 1.62 Max: 5.42
Current: 0.31
0.27
5.42
POCF 1.89
CHK's POCF is ranked higher than
66% of the 320 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.16 vs. CHK: 1.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
CHK' s 10-Year POCF Range
Min: 1.08  Med: 3.38 Max: 6.25
Current: 1.89
1.08
6.25
Current Ratio 0.83
CHK's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
67% of the 516 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.27 vs. CHK: 0.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
CHK' s 10-Year Current Ratio Range
Min: 0.44  Med: 0.82 Max: 3.11
Current: 0.83
0.44
3.11
Quick Ratio 0.83
CHK's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
65% of the 516 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.20 vs. CHK: 0.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
CHK' s 10-Year Quick Ratio Range
Min: 0.41  Med: 0.81 Max: 3.05
Current: 0.83
0.41
3.05
Days Sales Outstanding 33.11
CHK's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
65% of the 430 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 41.19 vs. CHK: 33.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
CHK' s 10-Year Days Sales Outstanding Range
Min: 26.44  Med: 57.07 Max: 126.1
Current: 33.11
26.44
126.1

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 4.99
CHK's Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
52% of the 382 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 5.36 vs. CHK: 4.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
CHK' s 10-Year Dividend Yield Range
Min: 0.44  Med: 1.22 Max: 5.91
Current: 4.99
0.44
5.91
Dividend Payout 0.21
CHK's Dividend Payout is ranked higher than
86% of the 161 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.72 vs. CHK: 0.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout only.
CHK' s 10-Year Dividend Payout Range
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.12 Max: 4.4
Current: 0.21
0.01
4.4
Dividend growth (3y) 11.90
CHK's Dividend growth (3y) is ranked higher than
69% of the 85 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 4.00 vs. CHK: 11.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend growth (3y) only.
CHK' s 10-Year Dividend growth (3y) Range
Min: 0  Med: 4.90 Max: 48.1
Current: 11.9
0
48.1
Yield on cost (5-Year) 6.25
CHK's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
51% of the 392 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 6.37 vs. CHK: 6.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
CHK' s 10-Year Yield on cost (5-Year) Range
Min: 0.55  Med: 1.53 Max: 7.4
Current: 6.25
0.55
7.4
Share Buyback Rate -0.90
CHK's Share Buyback Rate is ranked higher than
76% of the 392 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -7.40 vs. CHK: -0.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Share Buyback Rate only.
CHK' s 10-Year Share Buyback Rate Range
Min: 2.6  Med: -15.45 Max: -32.1
Current: -0.9

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 0.79
CHK's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
50% of the 458 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.76 vs. CHK: 0.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
CHK' s 10-Year Price/Tangible Book Range
Min: 0.56  Med: 1.64 Max: 12.05
Current: 0.79
0.56
12.05
Price/Median PS Value 0.20
CHK's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
78% of the 406 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.42 vs. CHK: 0.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
CHK' s 10-Year Price/Median PS Value Range
Min: 0.14  Med: 1.05 Max: 7.14
Current: 0.2
0.14
7.14
Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value 0.92
CHK's Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value is ranked lower than
1357% of the 44 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.00 vs. CHK: 0.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value only.
CHK' s 10-Year Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value Range
Min: 0.25  Med: 0.94 Max: 3.47
Current: 0.92
0.25
3.47
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) -46.10
CHK's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
82% of the 530 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -6.40 vs. CHK: -46.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
CHK' s 10-Year Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: -47.79  Med: 9.00 Max: 15.6
Current: -46.1
-47.79
15.6
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) -136.34
CHK's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked lower than
89% of the 191 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -11.23 vs. CHK: -136.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
CHK' s 10-Year Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range
Min: -76.1  Med: -24.45 Max: 45.5
Current: -136.34
-76.1
45.5

Analyst Estimate

Dec15 Dec16 Dec17
Revenue(Mil) 8,370 7,413 4,685
EPS($) -0.49 -0.32 0.50
EPS without NRI($) -0.49 -0.32 0.50

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - E&P » Oil & Gas E&P
Compare:OJSCY, APC, APA, HRTPY, SGTZY » details
Traded in other countries:CHKDG.USA, CHKVZ.USA, CHKDH.USA, CHKDP.USA, CHKDJ.USA, CHKVP.USA, CS1.Germany, CHK.Mexico,
Chesapeake Energy Corp was incorporated in Oklahoma in 1989. The Company is a natural gas and oil exploration and production Company engaged in the exploration, development and acquisition of properties for the production of natural gas and crude oil from underground reservoirs and it provides marketing and midstream services. The Company operates in three segments which are managed separately because of the nature of its products and services. Its segments includes; exploration and production; marketing, gathering and compression; and oilfield services. The Company's exploration and production operating segment is responsible for finding and producing natural gas, oil and NGL; it's marketing, gathering and compression operating segment is responsible for marketing, gathering and compression of natural gas, oil and NGL; and its oilfield services operating segment is responsible for drilling, oilfield trucking, oilfield rentals, hydraulic fracturing and other oilfield services operations for both Chesapeake-operated wells and wells operated by third parties. The Company focuses its exploration, development, acquisition and production efforts in the two geographic operating divisions; Southern division and Northern Division. The Company's Southern Division includes the Eagle Ford Shale in South Texas, the Granite Wash/Hogshooter, Cleveland, Tonkawa and Mississippi Lime plays in the Anadarko Basin in northwestern Oklahoma, the Texas Panhandle and southern Kansas, the Haynesville/Bossier Shale in northwestern Louisiana and East Texas and the Barnett Shale in the Fort Worth Basin in north-central Texas. Its Northern Division includes the Utica Shale in Ohio, West Virginia and Pennsylvania, the Marcellus Shale in the northern Appalachian Basin in West Virginia and Pennsylvania and the Niobrara Shale in the Powder River Basin in Wyoming. At December 31, 2014, the Company had interests in approximately 45,100 gross productive wells, including properties in which it held an overriding royalty interest. It competes with both integrated and other independent natural gas and oil companies in acquiring desirable leasehold acreage, producing properties and the equipment and expertise necessary to explore, develop and operate its properties and market its production. The Company's exploration and production operations are subject to various types of regulation at the U.S. federal, state and local levels. Such regulation includes requirements for permits to drill and to conduct other operations and for provision of financial assurances covering drilling and well operations.
» More Articles for CHK

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
oil Aug 11 2015 
Carl Ichan is not Afraid of the Energy Sector Aug 11 2015 
oil Aug 10 2015 
oil Aug 10 2015 
oil Aug 10 2015 
test 1 Jul 29 2015 
test 1 Jul 29 2015 
test 1 Jul 29 2015 
Ariel Focus Fund: 2Q Commentary Jul 28 2015 
Mason Hawkins Adds to Stake in Consol Energy Jul 24 2015 

More From Other Websites
Pisani: Stock rally comes ridiculous drama Aug 27 2015
Carl Icahn Doubles Down On Plunging Commodity Bets With Activist Stake In Freeport McMoran Aug 27 2015
Oil & Gas Stock Outlook - Aug. 2015 Aug 27 2015
Natural Gas Prices Rise from the Key Support Level Aug 27 2015
Natural Gas Price Ticks Lower After Storage Report Aug 27 2015
Chesapeake Energy (CHK) Stock Up on Higher Oil Prices Aug 27 2015
Will Consumption Data Benefit Natural Gas Prices? Aug 26 2015
Will Natural Gas Prices Break the Support Level? Aug 26 2015
Why Oil Stock Dividends are 'Mostly' Safe Aug 25 2015
Goldman Sachs Picks 25 Stocks With the Most Upside Potential Aug 25 2015
25 Oversold Stocks to Buy Now Aug 25 2015
Judge: Chesapeake improperly deducted postproduction costs from Bass-led group's royalty checks Aug 25 2015
Chesapeake Energy (CHK) Stock Falls Amid Declining Oil Prices Aug 24 2015
Icahn Gets Board Seats From Cheniere Aug 24 2015
Energy's big dividend dilemma Aug 24 2015
Carnage in crude Aug 21 2015
Notice of Proposed Voluntary Dismissal of Derivative Action Aug 21 2015
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORP Files SEC form 8-K, Other Events, Financial Statements and Exhibits Aug 21 2015
Notice of Proposed Voluntary Dismissal of Derivative Action Aug 21 2015
US energy shares dive on oil setback Aug 19 2015
Chesapeake Energy (CHK) Stock Falls on Lower Oil Prices Aug 19 2015
Chesapeake Energy Corporation Reports 2015 Second Quarter Financial and Operational Results Aug 05 2015
Chesapeake reports 2Q loss Aug 05 2015
CHK! Research Update Jul 23 2015
Chesapeake Energy eliminates annual dividend Jul 21 2015
Chesapeake Energy Corporation Updates Financial Strategy Jul 21 2015
FourPoint Energy buying well assets for $840 million Jul 01 2015
Myanmar Drilling Update - CHK 1198 Completed as an Oil Producer Jun 08 2015
Myanmar Drilling Update - Drilling Commencement of CHK 1198 May 22 2015
Chesapeake reports 1Q loss May 06 2015
Chesapeake Energy Corporation Reports 2015 First Quarter Financial and Operational Results May 06 2015
Study: Trace amount of drilling fluid found in water well May 04 2015
Study: Trace amount of drilling fluid found in water wells May 04 2015
Chesapeake Energy Corporation Names Frank Patterson Executive Vice President – Exploration, Land... May 04 2015
Myanmar Drilling Update - CHK 1196 Completed as an Oil Producer Apr 17 2015
Chesapeake Energy Corporation Announces Release Date and Conference Call Information for 2015 First... Apr 14 2015
Chesapeake Energy Corporation Appoints Kimberly K. Querrey to Board of Directors Apr 07 2015
Myanmar Drilling Update - CHK 1197 Completed as an Oil Producer Mar 26 2015
Myanmar Drilling Update - Drilling Commencement of CHK 1196 Mar 26 2015
Chesapeake Energy cutting 2015 capital spending goal by $50M Mar 23 2015
Chesapeake Energy Corporation Updates Its 2015 Operating Plan in Response to Low Commodity Price... Mar 23 2015
Chesapeake Energy Corporation Reports Financial and Operational Results for the 2014 Full Year and... Mar 10 2015
Chesapeake Energy Corporation Declares Quarterly Common and Preferred Stock Dividends Mar 05 2015
Chesapeake Energy sues founder, former CEO McClendon Feb 17 2015
Chesapeake Energy sues ousted chief for stealing data Feb 17 2015
Analysis: Oil company CEOs likely to avoid big hit to compensation – for now Feb 08 2015
Chesapeake Energy Corporation Announces Release Date and Conference Call Information for 2014 Fourth... Feb 05 2015
Hertz and Green Mountain are big market movers Dec 23 2014
Myanmar Drilling Update - CHK 1195 Completed as a Significant Oil Producer Dec 23 2014
Chesapeake Energy Corporation Closes Southern Marcellus and Utica Shale Sale; Announces $1 Billion... Dec 22 2014
Chesapeake beats Street 3Q forecasts Nov 05 2014
SW Energy snaps up assets in Marcellus, Utica Oct 16 2014
Chesapeake Energy 2Q profit drops 68 percent Aug 06 2014

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK