Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany, Mexico

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 3/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Equity to Asset 0.09
CHK's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
83% of the 428 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.50 vs. CHK: 0.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
CHK' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.33  Med: 0.37 Max: 0.56
Current: 0.09
-0.33
0.56
F-Score: 2
Z-Score: -3.62
M-Score: -6.02
WACC vs ROIC
3.44%
-75.44%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) -124.04
CHK's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
62% of the 433 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -65.39 vs. CHK: -124.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
CHK' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -116.14  Med: 20.86 Max: 46.59
Current: -124.04
-116.14
46.59
Net-margin (%) -99.24
CHK's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
56% of the 433 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -80.19 vs. CHK: -99.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
CHK' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -75.69  Med: 12.06 Max: 27.35
Current: -99.24
-75.69
27.35
ROE (%) -202.20
CHK's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
91% of the 450 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -23.67 vs. CHK: -202.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
CHK' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -41.13  Med: 8.80 Max: 21.85
Current: -202.2
-41.13
21.85
ROA (%) -50.72
CHK's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
80% of the 498 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -13.27 vs. CHK: -50.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
CHK' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -17.02  Med: 4.53 Max: 9.88
Current: -50.72
-17.02
9.88
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) -75.60
CHK's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
77% of the 479 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -23.45 vs. CHK: -75.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
CHK' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -30.57  Med: 8.95 Max: 19.58
Current: -75.6
-30.57
19.58
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 20.60
CHK's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
87% of the 367 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -10.50 vs. CHK: 20.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CHK' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -10.2  Med: 15.85 Max: 38.6
Current: 20.6
-10.2
38.6
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 7.60
CHK's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
70% of the 252 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -10.20 vs. CHK: 7.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CHK' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -13.1  Med: 6.70 Max: 44.6
Current: 7.6
-13.1
44.6
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) -6.90
CHK's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
53% of the 259 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -3.10 vs. CHK: -6.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CHK' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -46.6  Med: -1.40 Max: 145.3
Current: -6.9
-46.6
145.3
» CHK's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: Est. 2016-08-05)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Oprt. Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2015

CHK Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Murray Stahl 78,151 sh (+30.31%)
Arnold Schneider 3,147,857 sh (+27.03%)
John Rogers 277,130 sh (+25.52%)
Paul Tudor Jones 32,200 sh (+21.51%)
Richard Snow 4,134,360 sh (+11.13%)
Charles Brandes 10,228,072 sh (+5.38%)
John Buckingham 111,565 sh (+0.66%)
Bill Nygren 12,000,000 sh (unchged)
George Soros 1,900,000 sh (unchged)
Carl Icahn 73,050,000 sh (unchged)
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Mason Hawkins 60,488,573 sh (-5.78%)
David Dreman 27,193 sh (-27.88%)
Ray Dalio 162,000 sh (-63.87%)
Steven Cohen 480,700 sh (-72.50%)
» More
Q3 2015

CHK Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Jeremy Grantham 83,500 sh (New)
Andreas Halvorsen 1,940,852 sh (New)
Ray Dalio 188,600 sh (+16.42%)
Charles Brandes 11,728,300 sh (+14.67%)
Murray Stahl 88,092 sh (+12.72%)
George Soros 3,500,000 sh (unchged)
Carl Icahn 73,050,000 sh (unchged)
Bill Nygren 12,000,000 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
John Rogers 267,555 sh (-3.46%)
Mason Hawkins 57,905,526 sh (-4.27%)
John Buckingham 106,677 sh (-4.38%)
David Dreman 25,490 sh (-6.26%)
Arnold Schneider 2,352,259 sh (-25.27%)
Richard Snow 432,347 sh (-89.54%)
» More
Q4 2015

CHK Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Paul Tudor Jones 18,573 sh (New)
Murray Stahl 145,168 sh (+64.79%)
Arnold Schneider 3,342,901 sh (+42.11%)
Jeremy Grantham 83,500 sh (unchged)
Bill Nygren 12,000,000 sh (unchged)
Carl Icahn 73,050,000 sh (unchged)
David Dreman Sold Out
Andreas Halvorsen Sold Out
John Buckingham Sold Out
Ray Dalio 183,800 sh (-2.55%)
Charles Brandes 11,305,642 sh (-3.60%)
Mason Hawkins 55,671,392 sh (-3.86%)
Richard Snow 371,355 sh (-14.11%)
John Rogers 227,230 sh (-15.07%)
» More
Q1 2016

CHK Guru Trades in Q1 2016

David Dreman 4,520 sh (New)
John Griffin 7,060,000 sh (New)
Jeremy Grantham 179,300 sh (+114.73%)
Mason Hawkins 61,926,151 sh (+11.24%)
Carl Icahn 73,050,000 sh (unchged)
Richard Snow Sold Out
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Bill Nygren Sold Out
Arnold Schneider 2,700,261 sh (-19.22%)
Murray Stahl 104,932 sh (-27.72%)
Paul Tudor Jones 12,300 sh (-33.77%)
John Rogers 137,360 sh (-39.55%)
Charles Brandes 1,936,594 sh (-82.87%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CHK

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Preferred stocks of Chesapeake Energy Corp

SymbolPriceYieldDescription
CHKDG29.008.62
CHKVZ448.750.00
CHKDH80.500.00
CHKPRD26.368.544.50% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock
CHKDP310.009.275 3/4 % Pfd Shs
CHKDJ295.000.005 3/4 % Cum Non-Voting Conv Pfd Shs Reg-S
4GGB.Singapore0.000.005 3/4 % Conv Pfd Shs Series -A- -144A-
4GJB.Singapore0.000.005 3/4 % Cum Non-Voting Conv Pfd Shs Reg-S
CHKVP300.009.585 3/4 % Cum Conv Pfd Shs Series -A-
CKRGZ0.000.005 3/4 % Pfd Shs -144A
CHKWZ0.000.005 3/4 % Conv Pfd Shs Series -A- -144A-

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - E&P » Oil & Gas E&P
Compare:NAS:GPOR, NYSE:VET, OTCPK:MAGH, NYSE:CNX, NYSE:RICE, NYSE:BSM, OTCPK:PREKF, OTCPK:PEYUF, NYSE:EGN, NYSE:WPX, NYSE:NFG, OTCPK:DETNF, OTCPK:TUWOY, NAS:PDCE, NYSE:MUR, OTCPK:SPGYF, OTCPK:LNDNF, NYSE:KOS, NYSE:LPI, NYSE:PE » details
Traded in other countries:CS1.Germany, CHK.Mexico,
Chesapeake Energy Corp is a natural gas and oil exploration and production company. It explores, develops and acquires properties for the production of natural gas and crude oil from underground reservoirs and also provides marketing & midstream services.

Chesapeake Energy Corp was incorporated in Oklahoma in 1989. The Company is a natural gas and oil exploration and production Company engaged in the exploration, development and acquisition of properties for the production of natural gas and crude oil from underground reservoirs and it provides marketing and midstream services. The Company operates in three segments which are managed separately because of the nature of its products and services. Its segments includes; exploration and production; marketing, gathering and compression; and oilfield services. The Company's exploration and production operating segment is responsible for finding and producing natural gas, oil and NGL; it's marketing, gathering and compression operating segment is responsible for marketing, gathering and compression of natural gas, oil and NGL; and its oilfield services operating segment is responsible for drilling, oilfield trucking, oilfield rentals, hydraulic fracturing and other oilfield services operations for both Chesapeake-operated wells and wells operated by third parties. The Company focuses its exploration, development, acquisition and production efforts in the two geographic operating divisions; Southern division and Northern Division. The Company's Southern Division includes the Eagle Ford Shale in South Texas, the Granite Wash/Hogshooter, Cleveland, Tonkawa and Mississippi Lime plays in the Anadarko Basin in northwestern Oklahoma, the Texas Panhandle and southern Kansas, the Haynesville/Bossier Shale in northwestern Louisiana and East Texas and the Barnett Shale in the Fort Worth Basin in north-central Texas. Its Northern Division includes the Utica Shale in Ohio, West Virginia and Pennsylvania, the Marcellus Shale in the northern Appalachian Basin in West Virginia and Pennsylvania and the Niobrara Shale in the Powder River Basin in Wyoming. It competes with both integrated and other independent natural gas and oil companies in acquiring desirable leasehold acreage, producing properties and the equipment and expertise necessary to explore, develop and operate its properties and market its production. The Company's exploration and production operations are subject to various types of regulation at the U.S. federal, state and local levels. Such regulation includes requirements for permits to drill and to conduct other operations and for provision of financial assurances covering drilling and well operations.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/S 0.27
CHK's P/S is ranked higher than
92% of the 438 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.38 vs. CHK: 0.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
CHK' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.08  Med: 1.38 Max: 5.96
Current: 0.27
0.08
5.96
PFCF 4.06
CHK's PFCF is ranked higher than
73% of the 124 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 10.83 vs. CHK: 4.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
CHK' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.89  Med: 5.83 Max: 29.98
Current: 4.06
1.89
29.98
POCF 9.08
CHK's POCF is ranked lower than
57% of the 306 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 6.27 vs. CHK: 9.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
CHK' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.85  Med: 3.31 Max: 11.57
Current: 9.08
0.85
11.57
Current Ratio 0.53
CHK's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
77% of the 482 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.36 vs. CHK: 0.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
CHK' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.44  Med: 0.79 Max: 3.11
Current: 0.53
0.44
3.11
Quick Ratio 0.53
CHK's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
76% of the 482 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.32 vs. CHK: 0.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
CHK' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.41  Med: 0.78 Max: 3.05
Current: 0.53
0.41
3.05
Days Sales Outstanding 28.60
CHK's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
70% of the 384 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 38.50 vs. CHK: 28.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
CHK' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 35.02  Med: 56.08 Max: 78.58
Current: 28.6
35.02
78.58
Days Payable 26.35
CHK's Days Payable is ranked lower than
77% of the 257 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 74.36 vs. CHK: 26.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
CHK' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 50.28  Med: 157.39 Max: 595.37
Current: 26.35
50.28
595.37

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Median PS Value 0.22
CHK's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
86% of the 405 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.78 vs. CHK: 0.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
CHK' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.16  Med: 1.19 Max: 7.23
Current: 0.22
0.16
7.23
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) -84.30
CHK's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
84% of the 531 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -12.80 vs. CHK: -84.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
CHK' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -87.4  Med: 8.70 Max: 16.6
Current: -84.3
-87.4
16.6
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) -228.91
CHK's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked lower than
95% of the 171 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -12.18 vs. CHK: -228.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
CHK' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -81  Med: -29.10 Max: 41.2
Current: -228.91
-81
41.2

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $11,957
EPS (TTM) $ -18.15
Beta1.86
Short Percentage of Float26.08%
52-Week Range $1.50 - 9.55
Shares Outstanding (Mil)684.61

Analyst Estimate


Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /home/gurufocu/public_html/modules/stock/estimate.php on line 163
Dec16 Dec17 Dec18
Revenue (Mil $) 3,760 4,323 4,841
EPS ($) -0.46 0.67 1.31
EPS w/o NRI ($) -0.46 0.67 1.31
EPS Growth Rate
(3Y to 5Y Estimate)
7.65%
Dividends Per Share ($)
» More Articles for NYSE:CHK

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Mason Hawkins' Southeastern Management Largest Trades of the 2nd Quarter Jul 18 2016 
Southeastern Asset Management Comments on Chesapeake Jul 14 2016 
Longleaf Partners 2nd Quarter Fund Commentary Jul 13 2016 
Bill Nygren Comments on Chesapeake Jul 11 2016 
Bill Nygren's 2nd Quarter Oakmark Select Fund Commentary Jul 11 2016 
Stocks Higher for the Week After Brexit Recovery Jul 01 2016 
John Rogers Comments on Chesapeake Energy Corp Jun 27 2016 
Oil Update: Are Bargains Still Out There? - Harris Associates Jun 20 2016 
Brandes Investments Comments on Chesapeake Jun 15 2016 
Brandes Global Equity Fund 1st Quarter Commentary Jun 15 2016 

More From Other Websites
Southwestern May Set Tone for Gas Players Like Chesapeake Energy Jul 22 2016
Chisholm Partners LLC Sue Chesapeake et al. Over U.S. Oil & Nat-Gas Leases (CHK) Jul 22 2016
10 Energy Stocks to Add to Your Watchlist Jul 22 2016
Noble Corporation (NE) Q2 Earnings: A Beat in the Cards? Jul 22 2016
Trades see a floor in Chesapeake Energy Jul 22 2016
Street Talk: Chesapeake Energy, WPX Energy and more Jul 21 2016
Earnings, Other News Have These 5 Stocks In Motion Today Jul 21 2016
Natural Gas Price Up on Hot Weather Forecast, Low Inventory Build Jul 21 2016
10:05 am Chesapeake Energy builds on yesterday's relative strength as price breaks out of a... Jul 21 2016
Chesapeake Energy upgraded by Tudor Pickering Jul 21 2016
Heavy call buying in Chesapeake Energy Jul 20 2016
Will Chesapeake (CHK) Stock Be Hurt by Lawsuit? Jul 20 2016
Early movers: MS, HAL, TUP, DIS, PNRA, MSFT, ISRG, FOXA, GE, UL & more Jul 20 2016
Chesapeake sued for allegedly rigging U.S. oil, natgas leases Jul 19 2016
Chesapeake sued for allegedly rigging bids on U.S. oil, natgas leases Jul 19 2016
Chesapeake Energy (CHK) Stock Slides as Oil Prices Slump Jul 19 2016
CNX Coal (CNXC): Will the Stock Disappoint in Q2 Earnings? Jul 19 2016
Chesapeake, Ward Sued by Shale Owners for Alleged Scheme Jul 18 2016
Chesapeake Energy Corporation Provides 2016 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call Information Jul 14 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)