Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.83
CMA's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
63% of the 1162 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 2.79 vs. CMA: 0.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
CMA' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.07  Med: 0.31 Max: 2.71
Current: 0.83
0.07
2.71
Equity to Asset 0.11
CMA's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
60% of the 1660 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 0.10 vs. CMA: 0.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
CMA' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.07  Med: 0.09 Max: 0.12
Current: 0.11
0.07
0.12
Interest Coverage 6.53
CMA's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
86% of the 1543 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 1.64 vs. CMA: 6.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
CMA' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.22  Med: 3.40 Max: 9.16
Current: 6.53
0.22
9.16
F-Score: 5
M-Score: -2.49
WACC vs ROIC
9.13%
9.08%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 23.15
CMA's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
70% of the 1677 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 31.23 vs. CMA: 23.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
CMA' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.39  Med: 27.64 Max: 39.71
Current: 23.15
-4.39
39.71
Net-margin (%) 16.17
CMA's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
72% of the 1680 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 22.64 vs. CMA: 16.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
CMA' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.65  Med: 19.74 Max: 31.47
Current: 16.17
0.65
31.47
ROE (%) 5.84
CMA's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
70% of the 1675 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 8.42 vs. CMA: 5.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
CMA' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.66  Med: 7.17 Max: 17.47
Current: 5.84
-1.66
17.47
ROA (%) 0.64
CMA's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
66% of the 1684 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 0.89 vs. CMA: 0.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
CMA' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.03  Med: 0.79 Max: 1.61
Current: 0.64
0.03
1.61
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 4.50
CMA's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
59% of the 1369 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 2.90 vs. CMA: 4.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CMA' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -23.7  Med: 1.90 Max: 45.3
Current: 4.5
-23.7
45.3
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 3.00
CMA's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
61% of the 1263 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 6.40 vs. CMA: 3.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CMA' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -81.5  Med: 7.20 Max: 353.8
Current: 3
-81.5
353.8
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 2.00
CMA's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
67% of the 1248 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 7.40 vs. CMA: 2.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CMA' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -43.8  Med: 4.00 Max: 54
Current: 2
-43.8
54
» CMA's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: Est. 2016-07-17)


Revenue & Net Income
Equity & Asset
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2015

CMA Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Caxton Associates 22,550 sh (New)
Mario Gabelli 24,900 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 6,602 sh (+15.68%)
John Keeley 11,705 sh (+6.12%)
David Dreman 3,980 sh (+3.35%)
PRIMECAP Management 336,200 sh (+0.54%)
Martin Whitman 2,152,249 sh (unchged)
Diamond Hill Capital Sold Out
Richard Pzena 2,957,942 sh (-5.44%)
Third Avenue Management 2,973,178 sh (-5.51%)
Jeremy Grantham 40,500 sh (-18.51%)
RS Investment Management 419,850 sh (-19.57%)
» More
Q3 2015

CMA Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Louis Moore Bacon 50,000 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 209,200 sh (New)
Jim Simons 932,147 sh (New)
Mario Gabelli 167,600 sh (+573.09%)
Paul Tudor Jones 34,706 sh (+425.69%)
RS Investment Management 566,810 sh (+35.00%)
John Keeley 12,330 sh (+5.34%)
Caxton Associates Sold Out
Third Avenue Management 2,591,334 sh (-12.84%)
David Dreman 2,942 sh (-26.08%)
Richard Pzena 1,818,056 sh (-38.54%)
Jeremy Grantham 16,727 sh (-58.70%)
PRIMECAP Management 53,500 sh (-84.09%)
Martin Whitman 1,988,349 sh (-7.62%)
» More
Q4 2015

CMA Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Steven Cohen 373,900 sh (+78.73%)
John Keeley 12,690 sh (+2.92%)
Mario Gabelli 168,300 sh (+0.42%)
RS Investment Management 567,150 sh (+0.06%)
PRIMECAP Management 53,500 sh (unchged)
Paul Tudor Jones 7,600 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Jeremy Grantham Sold Out
David Dreman Sold Out
Louis Moore Bacon Sold Out
Richard Pzena 1,755,338 sh (-3.45%)
Third Avenue Management 2,475,873 sh (-4.46%)
Paul Tudor Jones 12,816 sh (-63.07%)
Martin Whitman 1,757,349 sh (-11.62%)
» More
2016

CMA Guru Trades in 2016

Martin Whitman 1,757,349 sh (unchged)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CMA

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Guru Investment Theses on Comerica Inc

Third Avenue Management Comments on Comerica - Dec 10, 2015

Comerica (NYSE:CMA) is the largest bank headquartered in Texas; it has a meaningful footprint in California and Michigan. Among the root causes of stock price dislocation was its exposure to Energy and low interest rates, which caused minor earnings per share estimate cuts for 2015. We believe those risks are mis-understood and overstated. While only 7% of CMA’s loan portfolio is linked to energy or “energy related” companies, it has been a source of investor scrutiny and confusion. Investors keep expecting net charge offs to rise, but they have remained marginal. Why? Comerica has an impressive underwriting history and we remain confident history will repeat itself. 95% of its energy loans outstanding are secured. Also, all underwriting decisions were based on “proved reserves” which should mitigate charge-off risk. Charge-offs will rise if the brutal decline in energy prices continues for extended periods of time, but we expect the risks to be manageable and much better than what is priced into the current stock price.

Few banks would benefit more from a rise in interest rates than CMA as 85% of its loan book is floating rate. The Federal Reserve’s reluctance to raise rates has been frustrating, but it will come. When it does, it will have a material impact on CMA’s earnings power.

In our view, CMA has one of the strongest balance sheets in the industry with a Tier 1 Common Equity ratio exceeding 10%. Despite the interest rate headwinds, it is still compounding at high single rates (including dividends). With a little help from rates, that should jump to double digits rates. Yet, CMA common stock only trades at slight premium to tangible book value. We like the potential of getting paid through book value compounding and multiple expansion with limited financial risk. CMA is one of those situations. At slightly over 1x tangible book value of 34.35, we think CMA could also be an accretive takeover target for a number of large US or foreign banks.

From Third Avenue Management (Trades, Portfolio)'s Value Fund fourth quarter 2015 portfolio manager commentary.

Check out Martin Whitman latest stock trades

Third Avenue Value Fund Comments on Comerica Inc - Sep 12, 2014

We have preferred regional banks for three reasons. First, at TAM we focus on price to tangible book value (P/TBV) as opposed to simple P/B. Tangible book value is a better measure of intrinsic value as it excludes intangible assets which wouldn’t carry much value in liquidation. As discussed earlier, one of the dimensions we focus on as we evaluate companies is the assets. The valuations of KEY and CMA are much closer to peers listed above on a P/TBV basis. Evaluating just a single statistic may provide misleading conclusions when evaluating an investment. Thus, we also consider how well a company can compound its book value over time. As seen in the table above, both KEY and CMA are generating higher returns on assets (ROA) than peers. This is important as companies that generate higher returns deserve premium valuations. Again, we distinguish among the many metrics. We focus on ROA as the measure of ROA does not favor companies that carry higher leverage and perhaps higher risk.



Second, the Tier 1 Common Equity ratios for KEY and CMA compare favorably against the money center peers. This metric indicates that the Fund’s regional banks are as well, if not better, capitalized than money center banks. As discussed in the opening paragraphs of the letter, the integrity of the balance sheet is a key dimension to our analysis.



Third, the chart above also shows the Level III assets for each company. Level III assets are not traded in liquid markets so prices are determined using a company’s internal models. Those prices could be entirely accurate, but as seen during the financial crisis, when liquidity dries up, asset prices of illiquid securities can get distorted quickly. We aren’t willing to take that risk. By focusing on KEY and CMA’s TBV and lower exposure to Level III assets, we gain additional comfort with their balance sheets. The regulators agree with our view. The table above shows “severely stressed capital ratios” from the Federal Reserve test earlier this year. The stress test assumptions are extreme (deep recession, high unemployment, 50% decline in equity prices and 2001 house prices), but the results do provide insight into the strength of the asset portfolios.



KEY and CMA’s above average results on the stress tests are another indication of the high transparency and durability of their balance sheets.



In sum, a discount to book value isn’t good enough for us at TAM to invest in a stock. We also need conviction in adequate downside protection. Investing in companies with low leverage and high quality assets helps us develop that conviction. CMA and KEY fit our strict criteria and have provided solid returns to investors thus far and as both grow book value plus dividends in the future, we are confident those returns will continue.



The Fund invested in the common stocks in KEY and CMA at discounts to tangible book and with the expectation that they could grow book value at double digit rates over time. Given the satisfactory ROAs and BV compounding (trailing twelve month BV growth including dividends: CMA: 12%, KEY: 9.8%), we are happy with how our companies are executing, despite persistently low interest rates and sluggish loan growth. What’s more impressive is that our companies are able to generate higher ROAs despite carrying more excess capital which weighs on returns. Both companies are positive contributors to the Fund’s performance year to date.



From Third Avenue Value Fund’s Third Quarter 2014 Commentary.



Check out Martin Whitman latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Comerica Inc

What Third Avenue Management Thinks Market Has Over-Punished Market has overreacted about some solid areas, managers said
With volatility and enthusiasm for growth stocks marking the year-end market, long-term investors Third Avenue Management (Trades, Portfolio) spotted some compelling areas facing temporary setbacks to invest in and gave their trading details in their fourth quarter portfolio update Tuesday. Read more...
Third Avenue Management Comments on Comerica Guru stock highlight
Comerica (NYSE:CMA) is the largest bank headquartered in Texas; it has a meaningful footprint in California and Michigan. Among the root causes of stock price dislocation was its exposure to Energy and low interest rates, which caused minor earnings per share estimate cuts for 2015. We believe those risks are mis-understood and overstated. While only 7% of CMA’s loan portfolio is linked to energy or “energy related” companies, it has been a source of investor scrutiny and confusion. Investors keep expecting net charge offs to rise, but they have remained marginal. Why? Comerica has an impressive underwriting history and we remain confident history will repeat itself. 95% of its energy loans outstanding are secured. Also, all underwriting decisions were based on “proved reserves” which should mitigate charge-off risk. Charge-offs will rise if the brutal decline in energy prices continues for extended periods of time, but we expect the risks to be manageable and much better than what is priced into the current stock price. Read more...
Top 5 Holdings of Third Avenue's Flagship Fund Manager Chip Rewey Rewey joined Marty Whitman's company in 2014 and looks for companies with strong book value growth
Chip Rewey, a GuruFocus Value Conference 2016 speaker, joined Third Avenue Management (Trades, Portfolio) in 2014 as lead portfolio manager for the value and small-cap funds and upholds many of the firm’s investing tenets as developed by founder Marty Whitman – centered on long-term factors including book value, creditworthiness and net asset value (NAV). Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 18.02
CMA's P/E(ttm) is ranked lower than
75% of the 1570 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 12.56 vs. CMA: 18.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
CMA' s P/E(ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.78  Med: 12.99 Max: 58.45
Current: 18.02
7.78
58.45
Forward P/E 13.37
CMA's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
72% of the 368 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 11.76 vs. CMA: 13.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
PE(NRI) 17.95
CMA's PE(NRI) is ranked lower than
74% of the 1570 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 12.56 vs. CMA: 17.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
CMA' s PE(NRI) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.85  Med: 13.19 Max: 62.15
Current: 17.95
7.85
62.15
Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) 14.07
CMA's Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) is ranked lower than
58% of the 880 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 12.31 vs. CMA: 14.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) only.
CMA' s Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.14  Med: 11.90 Max: 462.13
Current: 14.07
7.14
462.13
P/B 1.01
CMA's P/B is ranked higher than
52% of the 1642 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 1.04 vs. CMA: 1.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
CMA' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.38  Med: 1.11 Max: 2.06
Current: 1.01
0.38
2.06
P/S 2.89
CMA's P/S is ranked higher than
50% of the 1637 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 2.93 vs. CMA: 2.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
CMA' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.74  Med: 2.70 Max: 4.02
Current: 2.89
0.74
4.02
PFCF 12.05
CMA's PFCF is ranked higher than
50% of the 858 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 10.68 vs. CMA: 12.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
CMA' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.87  Med: 11.67 Max: 316.49
Current: 12.05
2.87
316.49
POCF 10.35
CMA's POCF is ranked lower than
51% of the 975 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 9.20 vs. CMA: 10.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
CMA' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.38  Med: 9.14 Max: 59.05
Current: 10.35
2.38
59.05
EV-to-EBIT 7.15
CMA's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
84% of the 1503 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 13.40 vs. CMA: 7.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
CMA' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3139.2  Med: 10.40 Max: 282.5
Current: 7.15
-3139.2
282.5
EV-to-EBITDA 6.04
CMA's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
86% of the 1507 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 12.24 vs. CMA: 6.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
CMA' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.1  Med: 10.60 Max: 1899.1
Current: 6.04
3.1
1899.1
PEG 1.31
CMA's PEG is ranked lower than
53% of the 724 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 1.03 vs. CMA: 1.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only.
CMA' s PEG Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.17  Med: 0.33 Max: 1.39
Current: 1.31
0.17
1.39
Shiller P/E 17.13
CMA's Shiller P/E is ranked higher than
53% of the 504 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 17.22 vs. CMA: 17.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
CMA' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.9  Med: 10.38 Max: 18.21
Current: 17.13
2.9
18.21

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 1.90
CMA's Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
66% of the 2098 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 2.90 vs. CMA: 1.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
CMA' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.45  Med: 1.74 Max: 17.02
Current: 1.9
0.45
17.02
Dividend Payout 0.29
CMA's Dividend Payout is ranked higher than
72% of the 1273 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 0.34 vs. CMA: 0.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout only.
CMA' s Dividend Payout Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.13  Med: 0.37 Max: 3.67
Current: 0.29
0.13
3.67
Dividend Growth (3y) 14.70
CMA's Dividend Growth (3y) is ranked higher than
67% of the 742 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 7.80 vs. CMA: 14.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Growth (3y) only.
CMA' s Dividend Growth (3y) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -56.1  Med: 7.70 Max: 40.1
Current: 14.7
-56.1
40.1
Forward Dividend Yield 1.98
CMA's Forward Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
72% of the 1965 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 2.74 vs. CMA: 1.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield only.
N/A
Yield on cost (5-Year) 6.18
CMA's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
82% of the 2495 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 3.43 vs. CMA: 6.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
CMA' s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.46  Med: 5.66 Max: 55.35
Current: 6.18
1.46
55.35
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 1.90
CMA's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
91% of the 1112 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: -2.00 vs. CMA: 1.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
CMA' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -29.1  Med: 0.20 Max: 24.2
Current: 1.9
-29.1
24.2

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 1.01
CMA's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
57% of the 1634 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 1.11 vs. CMA: 1.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
CMA' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.55  Med: 1.73 Max: 4.3
Current: 1.01
0.55
4.3
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 14.00
CMA's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
86% of the 1644 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 6.90 vs. CMA: 14.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
CMA' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.4  Med: 8.80 Max: 27.8
Current: 14
0.4
27.8
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 14.56
CMA's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
64% of the 843 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 13.13 vs. CMA: 14.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
CMA' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -42.4  Med: 9.50 Max: 90.7
Current: 14.56
-42.4
90.7

More Statistics

Revenue(Mil) $2764
EPS $ 2.46
Beta1.32
Short Percentage of Float4.34%
52-Week Range $30.48 - 53.45
Shares Outstanding(Mil)175.13

Analyst Estimate

Dec16 Dec17 Dec18
Revenue(Mil) 2,870 3,056 3,140
EPS($) 2.81 3.32 3.61
EPS without NRI($) 2.81 3.32 3.61

Business Description

Industry: Banks » Banks - Regional - US
Compare:NYSE:USB, NYSE:PNC, NYSE:BBT, NYSE:STI, NAS:HBANO, NYSE:MTB » details
Traded in other countries:CA3.Germany,
Comerica Inc is incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware in 1973. The Company is a financial services company which operates in three business segments: the Business Bank, the Retail Bank, and Wealth Management. The Business Bank is mainly comprised of the several businesses which include middle market, commercial real estate, national dealer services, international finance, leasing, financial services, and technology and life sciences. This business segment meets the needs of medium-size businesses, multinational corporations and governmental entities by offering various products and services, including commercial loans and lines of credit, deposits, cash management, capital market products, international trade finance, letters of credit, foreign exchange management services and loan syndication services. The Retail Bank includes small business banking and personal financial services, consisting of consumer lending, consumer deposit gathering and mortgage loan origination. In addition to financial services provided to small business customers, this business segment offers consumer products, including deposit accounts, installment loans, credit cards, student loans, home equity lines of credit and residential mortgage loans. Wealth Management offers products and services consisting of fiduciary services, private banking, retirement services, investment management and advisory services, investment banking and brokerage services. This business segment also offers the sale of annuity products, as well as life, disability and long-term care insurance products. The Company's banking subsidiaries compete mainly with banks based in its main areas of operations in the United States for loans, deposits and trust accounts. The Company is subject to supervision and regulation at the federal level by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
» More Articles for CMA

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
3 Stocks Warren Buffett Should Buy Apr 29 2016 
Third Avenue Value Fund 1st Quarter 2016 Letter Mar 29 2016 
CF Industries Among Stocks Trading Below Peter Lynch Value Feb 11 2016 
What Third Avenue Management Thinks Market Has Over-Punished Jan 07 2016 
Third Avenue Value Fund Sells Nearly Half of Stake in POSCO Jan 05 2016 
Third Avenue Management Comments on Comerica Dec 10 2015 
Third Avenue Value Fund 4th Quarter Portfolio Manager Commentary Dec 10 2015 
The Best-Performing Stocks in Martin Whitman's Portfolio Nov 23 2015 
Third Avenue Management Adds to Existing Stakes in 3rd Quarter Nov 16 2015 
Seven Best Stocks for Value Investors This Week Oct 28 2015 

More From Other Websites
COMERICA INC /NEW/ Files SEC form 8-K, Change in Directors or Principal Officers, Submission of... May 02 2016
COMERICA INC /NEW/ Files SEC form 10-Q, Quarterly Report Apr 29 2016
The C-Suite Speaks: Looking for a Curveball Apr 29 2016
Comerica Bank's Texas Index Sees Lightest Decline Since Energy Downturn Apr 27 2016
Comerica Bank's Texas Index Sees Lightest Decline Since Energy Downturn Apr 27 2016
Comerica Bank's California Index Flat on Stalling Tech Sector Apr 27 2016
Comerica Bank's California Index Flat on Stalling Tech Sector Apr 27 2016
Comerica Bank's Michigan Index Returns to Gains Apr 27 2016
Comerica Bank's Michigan Index Returns to Gains Apr 27 2016
[$$] At Annual Meeting, Some Comerica Investors Voice Dissatisfaction Apr 26 2016
Comerica's Investors Complain Their Giant Bank Is Too Small Apr 26 2016
[$$] Shareholders Protest at Comerica Annual Meeting Apr 26 2016
Comerica (CMA) Stock Gains, CEO Considers Sale Apr 26 2016
Comerica Gets a Wake-Up Call From Investors Pushing Potential Sale Apr 26 2016
Comerica CEO: Sale one element being considered to increase shareholder value Apr 26 2016
Comerica Directors Increase Quarterly Dividend 5 Percent to 22 Cents per Share Apr 26 2016
Comerica Directors Increase Quarterly Dividend 5 Percent to 22 Cents per Share Apr 26 2016
Will Comerica Be Able to Sell Itself? Apr 26 2016
Comerica Announces Results From Annual Meeting Of Shareholders Apr 26 2016
Comerica Announces Results From Annual Meeting Of Shareholders Apr 26 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK