Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.83
CMA's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
63% of the 1181 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 3.02 vs. CMA: 0.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
CMA' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.07  Med: 0.31 Max: 2.71
Current: 0.83
0.07
2.71
Equity to Asset 0.11
CMA's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
59% of the 1662 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 0.10 vs. CMA: 0.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
CMA' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.07  Med: 0.09 Max: 0.12
Current: 0.11
0.07
0.12
Interest Coverage 6.53
CMA's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
87% of the 1545 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 1.65 vs. CMA: 6.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
CMA' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.22  Med: 3.40 Max: 9.16
Current: 6.53
0.22
9.16
F-Score: 5
M-Score: -2.49
WACC vs ROIC
9.02%
9.08%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 23.15
CMA's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
69% of the 1681 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 30.85 vs. CMA: 23.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
CMA' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.39  Med: 27.64 Max: 39.71
Current: 23.15
-4.39
39.71
Net-margin (%) 16.17
CMA's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
71% of the 1681 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 22.34 vs. CMA: 16.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
CMA' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.65  Med: 19.74 Max: 31.47
Current: 16.17
0.65
31.47
ROE (%) 5.84
CMA's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
68% of the 1676 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 8.28 vs. CMA: 5.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
CMA' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.66  Med: 7.17 Max: 17.47
Current: 5.84
-1.66
17.47
ROA (%) 0.64
CMA's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
65% of the 1686 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 0.87 vs. CMA: 0.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
CMA' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.03  Med: 0.79 Max: 1.61
Current: 0.64
0.03
1.61
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 4.50
CMA's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
61% of the 1387 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 2.60 vs. CMA: 4.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CMA' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -23.7  Med: 1.20 Max: 39.4
Current: 4.5
-23.7
39.4
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 3.00
CMA's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
58% of the 1278 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 5.80 vs. CMA: 3.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CMA' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -81.5  Med: 3.00 Max: 353.8
Current: 3
-81.5
353.8
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 2.10
CMA's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
66% of the 1258 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 7.40 vs. CMA: 2.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CMA' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -43.7  Med: 4.00 Max: 53.6
Current: 2.1
-43.7
53.6
» CMA's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2016-07-19)


Revenue & Net Income
Equity & Asset
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Oprt. Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2015

CMA Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Caxton Associates 22,550 sh (New)
Mario Gabelli 24,900 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 6,602 sh (+15.68%)
John Keeley 11,705 sh (+6.12%)
David Dreman 3,980 sh (+3.35%)
PRIMECAP Management 336,200 sh (+0.54%)
Martin Whitman 2,152,249 sh (unchged)
Diamond Hill Capital Sold Out
Richard Pzena 2,957,942 sh (-5.44%)
Third Avenue Management 2,973,178 sh (-5.51%)
Jeremy Grantham 40,500 sh (-18.51%)
RS Investment Management 419,850 sh (-19.57%)
» More
Q3 2015

CMA Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Jim Simons 932,147 sh (New)
Louis Moore Bacon 50,000 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 209,200 sh (New)
Mario Gabelli 167,600 sh (+573.09%)
Paul Tudor Jones 34,706 sh (+425.69%)
RS Investment Management 566,810 sh (+35.00%)
John Keeley 12,330 sh (+5.34%)
Caxton Associates Sold Out
Third Avenue Management 2,591,334 sh (-12.84%)
David Dreman 2,942 sh (-26.08%)
Richard Pzena 1,818,056 sh (-38.54%)
Jeremy Grantham 16,727 sh (-58.70%)
PRIMECAP Management 53,500 sh (-84.09%)
Martin Whitman 1,988,349 sh (-7.62%)
» More
Q4 2015

CMA Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Steven Cohen 373,900 sh (+78.73%)
John Keeley 12,690 sh (+2.92%)
Mario Gabelli 168,300 sh (+0.42%)
RS Investment Management 567,150 sh (+0.06%)
Paul Tudor Jones 7,600 sh (unchged)
PRIMECAP Management 53,500 sh (unchged)
Jeremy Grantham Sold Out
David Dreman Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
Louis Moore Bacon Sold Out
Richard Pzena 1,755,338 sh (-3.45%)
Third Avenue Management 2,475,873 sh (-4.46%)
Paul Tudor Jones 12,816 sh (-63.07%)
Martin Whitman 1,757,349 sh (-11.62%)
» More
Q1 2016

CMA Guru Trades in Q1 2016

First Pacific Advisors 198,770 sh (New)
Louis Moore Bacon 25,000 sh (New)
David Dreman 730 sh (New)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 463,400 sh (New)
John Keeley 57,870 sh (+356.03%)
RS Investment Management 776,415 sh (+36.90%)
Richard Pzena 2,244,512 sh (+27.87%)
Steven Cohen 445,100 sh (+19.04%)
Mario Gabelli 189,600 sh (+12.66%)
PRIMECAP Management 53,500 sh (unchged)
Martin Whitman 1,757,349 sh (unchged)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Third Avenue Management 2,067,054 sh (-16.51%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CMA

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Banks » Banks - Regional - US
Compare:NAS:HBAN, NAS:SBNY, NYSE:CIT, NAS:ZION, NAS:TFSL, NAS:SIVB, NYSE:KEY, NAS:PACW, NAS:CBSH, NYSE:FRC, NAS:BOKF, NYSE:CFR, NYSE:SNV, NYSE:CFG, NAS:FNFG, NAS:UMPQ, NYSE:PB, NAS:FMER, NYSE:WAL, NAS:OZRK » details
Traded in other countries:CA3.Germany,
Comerica Inc is a financial services company which operates in three business segments: the Business Bank, the Retail Bank, and Wealth Management.

Comerica Inc was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware in 1973. The Company is a financial services company which operates in three business segments: the Business Bank, the Retail Bank, and Wealth Management. The Business Bank is mainly comprised of the several businesses which include middle market, commercial real estate, national dealer services, international finance, leasing, financial services, and technology and life sciences. This business segment meets the needs of medium-size businesses, multinational corporations and governmental entities by offering various products and services, including commercial loans and lines of credit, deposits, cash management, capital market products, international trade finance, letters of credit, foreign exchange management services and loan syndication services. The Retail Bank includes small business banking and personal financial services, consisting of consumer lending, consumer deposit gathering and mortgage loan origination. In addition to financial services provided to small business customers, this business segment offers consumer products, including deposit accounts, installment loans, credit cards, student loans, home equity lines of credit and residential mortgage loans. Wealth Management offers products and services consisting of fiduciary services, private banking, retirement services, investment management and advisory services, investment banking and brokerage services. This business segment also offers the sale of annuity products, as well as life, disability and long-term care insurance products. It operates in three primary geographic markets Texas, California, and Michigan, as well as in Arizona and Florida, with select businesses operating in several other states, and in Canada and Mexico. The Company's banking subsidiaries compete mainly with banks based in its main areas of operations in the United States for loans, deposits and trust accounts. The Company is subject to supervision and regulation at the federal level by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Guru Investment Theses on Comerica Inc

Third Avenue Management Comments on Comerica - May 25, 2016

Comerica (NYSE:CMA) also benefitted from company-specific factors. Shareholder activists are leaning on Comerica management to boost returns or sell to a larger peer. We have always believed that one of the core contributors over the long-term is not just business fundamentals, but also a dedicated and open management team that pursues opportunities that can accelerate the creation of shareholder value. Comerica management took control of the situation and announced that it hired Boston Consulting Group in April to advise on strategic intiatives. We are eager to hear the recommendations and we are encouraged that management is open to a wide variety of options.



From Third Avenue Management (Trades, Portfolio)'s ThirdAvenueValueFund second quarter commentary.

Check out Third Avenue Management latest stock trades

Third Avenue Management Comments on Comerica - Dec 10, 2015

Comerica (NYSE:CMA) is the largest bank headquartered in Texas; it has a meaningful footprint in California and Michigan. Among the root causes of stock price dislocation was its exposure to Energy and low interest rates, which caused minor earnings per share estimate cuts for 2015. We believe those risks are mis-understood and overstated. While only 7% of CMA’s loan portfolio is linked to energy or “energy related” companies, it has been a source of investor scrutiny and confusion. Investors keep expecting net charge offs to rise, but they have remained marginal. Why? Comerica has an impressive underwriting history and we remain confident history will repeat itself. 95% of its energy loans outstanding are secured. Also, all underwriting decisions were based on “proved reserves” which should mitigate charge-off risk. Charge-offs will rise if the brutal decline in energy prices continues for extended periods of time, but we expect the risks to be manageable and much better than what is priced into the current stock price.

Few banks would benefit more from a rise in interest rates than CMA as 85% of its loan book is floating rate. The Federal Reserve’s reluctance to raise rates has been frustrating, but it will come. When it does, it will have a material impact on CMA’s earnings power.

In our view, CMA has one of the strongest balance sheets in the industry with a Tier 1 Common Equity ratio exceeding 10%. Despite the interest rate headwinds, it is still compounding at high single rates (including dividends). With a little help from rates, that should jump to double digits rates. Yet, CMA common stock only trades at slight premium to tangible book value. We like the potential of getting paid through book value compounding and multiple expansion with limited financial risk. CMA is one of those situations. At slightly over 1x tangible book value of 34.35, we think CMA could also be an accretive takeover target for a number of large US or foreign banks.

From Third Avenue Management (Trades, Portfolio)'s Value Fund fourth quarter 2015 portfolio manager commentary.

Check out Martin Whitman latest stock trades

Third Avenue Value Fund Comments on Comerica Inc - Sep 12, 2014

We have preferred regional banks for three reasons. First, at TAM we focus on price to tangible book value (P/TBV) as opposed to simple P/B. Tangible book value is a better measure of intrinsic value as it excludes intangible assets which wouldn’t carry much value in liquidation. As discussed earlier, one of the dimensions we focus on as we evaluate companies is the assets. The valuations of KEY and CMA are much closer to peers listed above on a P/TBV basis. Evaluating just a single statistic may provide misleading conclusions when evaluating an investment. Thus, we also consider how well a company can compound its book value over time. As seen in the table above, both KEY and CMA are generating higher returns on assets (ROA) than peers. This is important as companies that generate higher returns deserve premium valuations. Again, we distinguish among the many metrics. We focus on ROA as the measure of ROA does not favor companies that carry higher leverage and perhaps higher risk.



Second, the Tier 1 Common Equity ratios for KEY and CMA compare favorably against the money center peers. This metric indicates that the Fund’s regional banks are as well, if not better, capitalized than money center banks. As discussed in the opening paragraphs of the letter, the integrity of the balance sheet is a key dimension to our analysis.



Third, the chart above also shows the Level III assets for each company. Level III assets are not traded in liquid markets so prices are determined using a company’s internal models. Those prices could be entirely accurate, but as seen during the financial crisis, when liquidity dries up, asset prices of illiquid securities can get distorted quickly. We aren’t willing to take that risk. By focusing on KEY and CMA’s TBV and lower exposure to Level III assets, we gain additional comfort with their balance sheets. The regulators agree with our view. The table above shows “severely stressed capital ratios” from the Federal Reserve test earlier this year. The stress test assumptions are extreme (deep recession, high unemployment, 50% decline in equity prices and 2001 house prices), but the results do provide insight into the strength of the asset portfolios.



KEY and CMA’s above average results on the stress tests are another indication of the high transparency and durability of their balance sheets.



In sum, a discount to book value isn’t good enough for us at TAM to invest in a stock. We also need conviction in adequate downside protection. Investing in companies with low leverage and high quality assets helps us develop that conviction. CMA and KEY fit our strict criteria and have provided solid returns to investors thus far and as both grow book value plus dividends in the future, we are confident those returns will continue.



The Fund invested in the common stocks in KEY and CMA at discounts to tangible book and with the expectation that they could grow book value at double digit rates over time. Given the satisfactory ROAs and BV compounding (trailing twelve month BV growth including dividends: CMA: 12%, KEY: 9.8%), we are happy with how our companies are executing, despite persistently low interest rates and sluggish loan growth. What’s more impressive is that our companies are able to generate higher ROAs despite carrying more excess capital which weighs on returns. Both companies are positive contributors to the Fund’s performance year to date.



From Third Avenue Value Fund’s Third Quarter 2014 Commentary.



Check out Martin Whitman latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Comerica Inc

Third Avenue Management Comments on Comerica Guru stock highlight
Comerica (NYSE:CMA) also benefitted from company-specific factors. Shareholder activists are leaning on Comerica management to boost returns or sell to a larger peer. We have always believed that one of the core contributors over the long-term is not just business fundamentals, but also a dedicated and open management team that pursues opportunities that can accelerate the creation of shareholder value. Comerica management took control of the situation and announced that it hired Boston Consulting Group in April to advise on strategic intiatives. We are eager to hear the recommendations and we are encouraged that management is open to a wide variety of options. Read more...
What Third Avenue Management Thinks Market Has Over-Punished Market has overreacted about some solid areas, managers said
With volatility and enthusiasm for growth stocks marking the year-end market, long-term investors Third Avenue Management (Trades, Portfolio) spotted some compelling areas facing temporary setbacks to invest in and gave their trading details in their fourth quarter portfolio update Tuesday. Read more...
Third Avenue Management Comments on Comerica Guru stock highlight
Comerica (NYSE:CMA) is the largest bank headquartered in Texas; it has a meaningful footprint in California and Michigan. Among the root causes of stock price dislocation was its exposure to Energy and low interest rates, which caused minor earnings per share estimate cuts for 2015. We believe those risks are mis-understood and overstated. While only 7% of CMA’s loan portfolio is linked to energy or “energy related” companies, it has been a source of investor scrutiny and confusion. Investors keep expecting net charge offs to rise, but they have remained marginal. Why? Comerica has an impressive underwriting history and we remain confident history will repeat itself. 95% of its energy loans outstanding are secured. Also, all underwriting decisions were based on “proved reserves” which should mitigate charge-off risk. Charge-offs will rise if the brutal decline in energy prices continues for extended periods of time, but we expect the risks to be manageable and much better than what is priced into the current stock price. Read more...
Top 5 Holdings of Third Avenue's Flagship Fund Manager Chip Rewey Rewey joined Marty Whitman's company in 2014 and looks for companies with strong book value growth
Chip Rewey, a GuruFocus Value Conference 2016 speaker, joined Third Avenue Management (Trades, Portfolio) in 2014 as lead portfolio manager for the value and small-cap funds and upholds many of the firm’s investing tenets as developed by founder Marty Whitman – centered on long-term factors including book value, creditworthiness and net asset value (NAV). Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 16.33
CMA's P/E(ttm) is ranked lower than
72% of the 1598 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 12.56 vs. CMA: 16.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
CMA' s P/E(ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.74  Med: 13.26 Max: 57.43
Current: 16.33
7.74
57.43
Forward P/E 15.95
CMA's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
87% of the 385 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 12.58 vs. CMA: 15.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
PE(NRI) 16.33
CMA's PE(NRI) is ranked lower than
73% of the 1557 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 12.56 vs. CMA: 16.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
CMA' s PE(NRI) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.79  Med: 13.36 Max: 61.25
Current: 16.33
7.79
61.25
Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) 13.74
CMA's Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) is ranked lower than
61% of the 857 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 12.32 vs. CMA: 13.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) only.
CMA' s Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.14  Med: 12.78 Max: 78.74
Current: 13.74
7.14
78.74
P/B 0.92
CMA's P/B is ranked higher than
56% of the 1706 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 1.03 vs. CMA: 0.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
CMA' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.38  Med: 1.10 Max: 2
Current: 0.92
0.38
2
P/S 2.61
CMA's P/S is ranked higher than
54% of the 1685 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 2.88 vs. CMA: 2.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
CMA' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.74  Med: 2.68 Max: 3.85
Current: 2.61
0.74
3.85
PFCF 10.88
CMA's PFCF is ranked lower than
59% of the 893 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 10.10 vs. CMA: 10.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
CMA' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.87  Med: 11.76 Max: 316.49
Current: 10.88
2.87
316.49
POCF 9.34
CMA's POCF is ranked lower than
57% of the 997 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 8.84 vs. CMA: 9.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
CMA' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.38  Med: 9.23 Max: 59.05
Current: 9.34
2.38
59.05
EV-to-EBIT 11.77
CMA's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
53% of the 1547 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 12.99 vs. CMA: 11.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
CMA' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3139.2  Med: 10.40 Max: 282.5
Current: 11.77
-3139.2
282.5
EV-to-EBITDA 9.94
CMA's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
57% of the 1546 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 11.77 vs. CMA: 9.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
CMA' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.1  Med: 10.80 Max: 1899.1
Current: 9.94
3.1
1899.1
PEG 1.19
CMA's PEG is ranked lower than
55% of the 751 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 1.07 vs. CMA: 1.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only.
CMA' s PEG Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.17  Med: 0.57 Max: 119.4
Current: 1.19
0.17
119.4
Shiller P/E 15.00
CMA's Shiller P/E is ranked higher than
52% of the 505 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 16.65 vs. CMA: 15.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
CMA' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.83  Med: 10.43 Max: 17.9
Current: 15
2.83
17.9

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 2.12
CMA's Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
70% of the 2247 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 3.04 vs. CMA: 2.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
CMA' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.45  Med: 1.74 Max: 17.02
Current: 2.12
0.45
17.02
Dividend Payout 0.34
CMA's Dividend Payout is ranked lower than
52% of the 1293 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 0.33 vs. CMA: 0.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout only.
CMA' s Dividend Payout Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.13  Med: 0.37 Max: 3.67
Current: 0.34
0.13
3.67
Dividend Growth (3y) 14.70
CMA's Dividend Growth (3y) is ranked higher than
66% of the 751 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 8.50 vs. CMA: 14.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Growth (3y) only.
CMA' s Dividend Growth (3y) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -56.1  Med: 7.70 Max: 40.1
Current: 14.7
-56.1
40.1
Forward Dividend Yield 2.20
CMA's Forward Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
74% of the 2105 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 3.22 vs. CMA: 2.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield only.
N/A
Yield on cost (5-Year) 6.86
CMA's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
78% of the 2502 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 3.61 vs. CMA: 6.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
CMA' s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.46  Med: 5.66 Max: 55.35
Current: 6.86
1.46
55.35
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 2.30
CMA's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
92% of the 1081 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: -1.80 vs. CMA: 2.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
CMA' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9.5  Med: 0.80 Max: 4.1
Current: 2.3
-9.5
4.1

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 0.92
CMA's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
60% of the 1698 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 1.09 vs. CMA: 0.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
CMA' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.55  Med: 1.69 Max: 4.3
Current: 0.92
0.55
4.3
Price/Projected FCF 0.61
CMA's Price/Projected FCF is ranked higher than
50% of the 907 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 0.65 vs. CMA: 0.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
CMA' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.21  Med: 0.67 Max: 0.96
Current: 0.61
0.21
0.96
Price/Median PS Value 0.97
CMA's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
53% of the 1614 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 0.99 vs. CMA: 0.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
CMA' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.4  Med: 1.15 Max: 2.32
Current: 0.97
0.4
2.32
Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value 1.80
CMA's Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value is ranked lower than
85% of the 431 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 0.89 vs. CMA: 1.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value only.
CMA' s Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.54  Med: 1.18 Max: 2.73
Current: 1.8
0.54
2.73
Price/Graham Number 0.81
CMA's Price/Graham Number is ranked lower than
53% of the 1506 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 0.82 vs. CMA: 0.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
CMA' s Price/Graham Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.53  Med: 1.00 Max: 2.01
Current: 0.81
0.53
2.01
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 8.50
CMA's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
58% of the 1699 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 7.10 vs. CMA: 8.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
CMA' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.4  Med: 8.60 Max: 27.8
Current: 8.5
0.4
27.8
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 15.16
CMA's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
55% of the 870 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 12.80 vs. CMA: 15.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
CMA' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -42.4  Med: 11.00 Max: 90.8
Current: 15.16
-42.4
90.8

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $2,764
EPS (TTM) $ 2.45
Beta1.35
Short Percentage of Float2.94%
52-Week Range $30.48 - 53.45
Shares Outstanding (Mil)175.13

Analyst Estimate

Dec16 Dec17 Dec18
Revenue (Mil $) 2,870 3,056 3,140
EPS ($) 2.54 3.19 3.61
EPS w/o NRI ($) 2.54 3.19 3.61
EPS Growth Rate
(3Y to 5Y Estimate)
9.30%
» More Articles for CMA

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Third Avenue Management Comments on Comerica May 25 2016 
Third Avenue Management Q2 2016 Value Fund Letter May 25 2016 
3 Stocks Warren Buffett Should Buy Apr 29 2016 
Third Avenue Value Fund 1st Quarter 2016 Letter Mar 29 2016 
CF Industries Among Stocks Trading Below Peter Lynch Value Feb 11 2016 
What Third Avenue Management Thinks Market Has Over-Punished Jan 07 2016 
Third Avenue Value Fund Sells Nearly Half of Stake in POSCO Jan 05 2016 
Third Avenue Management Comments on Comerica Dec 10 2015 
Third Avenue Value Fund 4th Quarter Portfolio Manager Commentary Dec 10 2015 
The Best-Performing Stocks in Martin Whitman's Portfolio Nov 23 2015 

More From Other Websites
COMERICA INC /NEW/ Files SEC form 8-K, Regulation FD Disclosure, Financial Statements and Exhibits Jun 23 2016
Comerica Reports 2016 Company-Run Stress Test Results Jun 23 2016
Comerica Reports 2016 Company-Run Stress Test Results Jun 23 2016
Comerica Margins Under Pressure, Energy Sector a Drag Jun 22 2016
Comerica Wins Corporate Social Responsibility Leadership Award from Financial Services Roundtable Jun 17 2016
Comerica Wins Corporate Social Responsibility Leadership Award from Financial Services Roundtable Jun 17 2016
Comerica announces retirement of chief diversity officer Jun 16 2016
Linda D. Forte Announces Plans to Retire in August 2016, Following a 42-Year Career with Comerica... Jun 16 2016
Linda D. Forte Announces Plans to Retire in August 2016, Following a 42-Year Career with Comerica... Jun 16 2016
Comerica's Cost-Cutting Plan 'Booed' by Investors Who Wanted a Sale Jun 16 2016
Comerica, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : CMA-US : June 15, 2016 Jun 15 2016
Exclusive Q&A: Pat Faubion talks about his decision to retire from Comerica Jun 14 2016
J. Patrick Faubion Announces Plans to Retire in January 2017 Jun 14 2016
J. Patrick Faubion Announces Plans to Retire in January 2017 Jun 14 2016
Comerica Stock Trades Ex-Dividend Monday (CMA) Jun 13 2016
Downside position doubled in Comerica Jun 13 2016
COMERICA INC /NEW/ Financials Jun 10 2016
Heavy call volume is bullish in Comerica Jun 08 2016
American Express exec joins Comerica's C-suite Jun 07 2016
Sangy Vatsa named Chief Technology Officer (CTO) for Comerica Jun 07 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)