Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 2.06
CMA's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
56% of the 983 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 1.38 vs. CMA: 2.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
CMA' s 10-Year Cash to Debt Range
Min: 0.07  Med: 0.29 Max: 2.71
Current: 2.06
0.07
2.71
Equity to Asset 0.11
CMA's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
59% of the 1353 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 0.10 vs. CMA: 0.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
CMA' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: 0.07  Med: 0.09 Max: 0.12
Current: 0.11
0.07
0.12
Interest Coverage 9.16
CMA's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
90% of the 1269 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 1.61 vs. CMA: 9.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
CMA' s 10-Year Interest Coverage Range
Min: 0.22  Med: 0.92 Max: 9.16
Current: 9.16
0.22
9.16
F-Score: 4
WACC vs ROIC
8.67%
13.53%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 32.06
CMA's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
55% of the 1421 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 30.31 vs. CMA: 32.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
CMA' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: -4.39  Med: 34.33 Max: 45.12
Current: 32.06
-4.39
45.12
Net-margin (%) 21.83
CMA's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
51% of the 1421 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 22.02 vs. CMA: 21.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
CMA' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: 0.65  Med: 23.50 Max: 31.47
Current: 21.83
0.65
31.47
ROE (%) 7.60
CMA's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
56% of the 1423 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 8.48 vs. CMA: 7.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
CMA' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: -1.66  Med: 13.15 Max: 22.77
Current: 7.6
-1.66
22.77
ROA (%) 0.83
CMA's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
53% of the 1432 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 0.87 vs. CMA: 0.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
CMA' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: 0.03  Med: 1.20 Max: 2.02
Current: 0.83
0.03
2.02
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 1.20
CMA's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
55% of the 1210 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 2.10 vs. CMA: 1.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CMA' s 10-Year Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: -24.8  Med: 1.20 Max: 37.3
Current: 1.2
-24.8
37.3
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 15.20
CMA's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
69% of the 1066 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 7.60 vs. CMA: 15.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CMA' s 10-Year EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: -81.1  Med: 8.60 Max: 344.5
Current: 15.2
-81.1
344.5
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 14.90
CMA's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
62% of the 1065 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 9.70 vs. CMA: 14.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CMA' s 10-Year EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: -43.8  Med: 8.70 Max: 54
Current: 14.9
-43.8
54
» CMA's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Equity & Asset
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2014

CMA Guru Trades in Q3 2014

Caxton Associates 65,000 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 7,000 sh (+59.09%)
Jeremy Grantham 53,600 sh (+55.36%)
PRIMECAP Management 776,400 sh (+13.94%)
David Dreman 3,207 sh (+3.29%)
Richard Pzena 3,630,268 sh (+3.18%)
Pioneer Investments 436,467 sh (unchged)
John Keeley 10,830 sh (unchged)
Martin Whitman 1,626,949 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
HOTCHKIS & WILEY Sold Out
Third Avenue Management 2,464,210 sh (-3.62%)
RS Investment Management 484,620 sh (-19.04%)
» More
Q4 2014

CMA Guru Trades in Q4 2014

Ray Dalio 8,048 sh (New)
Jim Simons 209,147 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 30,541 sh (+336.30%)
PRIMECAP Management 889,300 sh (+14.54%)
Third Avenue Management 2,726,120 sh (+10.63%)
David Dreman 3,511 sh (+9.48%)
RS Investment Management 486,280 sh (+0.34%)
Martin Whitman 1,817,049 sh (+11.68%)
Caxton Associates Sold Out
Pioneer Investments Sold Out
Richard Pzena 3,552,661 sh (-2.14%)
John Keeley 10,530 sh (-2.77%)
Jeremy Grantham 45,800 sh (-14.55%)
» More
Q1 2015

CMA Guru Trades in Q1 2015

Diamond Hill Capital 8,123 sh (New)
Third Avenue Management 3,146,650 sh (+15.43%)
David Dreman 3,851 sh (+9.68%)
Jeremy Grantham 49,700 sh (+8.52%)
RS Investment Management 522,000 sh (+7.35%)
John Keeley 11,030 sh (+4.75%)
Martin Whitman 2,152,249 sh (+18.45%)
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
Richard Pzena 3,128,023 sh (-11.95%)
PRIMECAP Management 334,400 sh (-62.40%)
Paul Tudor Jones 5,707 sh (-81.31%)
» More
Q2 2015

CMA Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Mario Gabelli 24,900 sh (New)
Caxton Associates 22,550 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 6,602 sh (+15.68%)
John Keeley 11,705 sh (+6.12%)
David Dreman 3,980 sh (+3.35%)
PRIMECAP Management 336,200 sh (+0.54%)
Martin Whitman 2,152,249 sh (unchged)
Diamond Hill Capital Sold Out
Richard Pzena 2,957,942 sh (-5.44%)
Third Avenue Management 2,973,178 sh (-5.51%)
Jeremy Grantham 40,500 sh (-18.51%)
RS Investment Management 419,850 sh (-19.57%)
RS Investment Management 419,850 sh (-19.57%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CMA

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Guru Investment Theses on Comerica Inc

Third Avenue Value Fund Comments on Comerica Inc - Sep 12, 2014

We have preferred regional banks for three reasons. First, at TAM we focus on price to tangible book value (P/TBV) as opposed to simple P/B. Tangible book value is a better measure of intrinsic value as it excludes intangible assets which wouldn’t carry much value in liquidation. As discussed earlier, one of the dimensions we focus on as we evaluate companies is the assets. The valuations of KEY and CMA are much closer to peers listed above on a P/TBV basis. Evaluating just a single statistic may provide misleading conclusions when evaluating an investment. Thus, we also consider how well a company can compound its book value over time. As seen in the table above, both KEY and CMA are generating higher returns on assets (ROA) than peers. This is important as companies that generate higher returns deserve premium valuations. Again, we distinguish among the many metrics. We focus on ROA as the measure of ROA does not favor companies that carry higher leverage and perhaps higher risk.



Second, the Tier 1 Common Equity ratios for KEY and CMA compare favorably against the money center peers. This metric indicates that the Fund’s regional banks are as well, if not better, capitalized than money center banks. As discussed in the opening paragraphs of the letter, the integrity of the balance sheet is a key dimension to our analysis.



Third, the chart above also shows the Level III assets for each company. Level III assets are not traded in liquid markets so prices are determined using a company’s internal models. Those prices could be entirely accurate, but as seen during the financial crisis, when liquidity dries up, asset prices of illiquid securities can get distorted quickly. We aren’t willing to take that risk. By focusing on KEY and CMA’s TBV and lower exposure to Level III assets, we gain additional comfort with their balance sheets. The regulators agree with our view. The table above shows “severely stressed capital ratios” from the Federal Reserve test earlier this year. The stress test assumptions are extreme (deep recession, high unemployment, 50% decline in equity prices and 2001 house prices), but the results do provide insight into the strength of the asset portfolios.



KEY and CMA’s above average results on the stress tests are another indication of the high transparency and durability of their balance sheets.



In sum, a discount to book value isn’t good enough for us at TAM to invest in a stock. We also need conviction in adequate downside protection. Investing in companies with low leverage and high quality assets helps us develop that conviction. CMA and KEY fit our strict criteria and have provided solid returns to investors thus far and as both grow book value plus dividends in the future, we are confident those returns will continue.



The Fund invested in the common stocks in KEY and CMA at discounts to tangible book and with the expectation that they could grow book value at double digit rates over time. Given the satisfactory ROAs and BV compounding (trailing twelve month BV growth including dividends: CMA: 12%, KEY: 9.8%), we are happy with how our companies are executing, despite persistently low interest rates and sluggish loan growth. What’s more impressive is that our companies are able to generate higher ROAs despite carrying more excess capital which weighs on returns. Both companies are positive contributors to the Fund’s performance year to date.



From Third Avenue Value Fund’s Third Quarter 2014 Commentary.



Check out Martin Whitman latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Comerica Inc

Martin Whitman Adds to Holdings in Financial Services Companies
Of the 20 stocks in which guru Martin Whitman (Trades, Portfolio) traded in January of this year, he added to his holdings in eight. There was no real pattern to Whitman’s stock buys – except for the facts that two were in the Banking sector, and they dwarfed all of Whitman’s other January purchases. Read more...
Third Avenue Value Fund Comments on Comerica Inc
We have preferred regional banks for three reasons. First, at TAM we focus on price to tangible book value (P/TBV) as opposed to simple P/B. Tangible book value is a better measure of intrinsic value as it excludes intangible assets which wouldn’t carry much value in liquidation. As discussed earlier, one of the dimensions we focus on as we evaluate companies is the assets. The valuations of KEY and CMA are much closer to peers listed above on a P/TBV basis. Evaluating just a single statistic may provide misleading conclusions when evaluating an investment. Thus, we also consider how well a company can compound its book value over time. As seen in the table above, both KEY and CMA are generating higher returns on assets (ROA) than peers. This is important as companies that generate higher returns deserve premium valuations. Again, we distinguish among the many metrics. We focus on ROA as the measure of ROA does not favor companies that carry higher leverage and perhaps higher risk. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 14.12
CMA's P/E(ttm) is ranked lower than
55% of the 1300 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 13.20 vs. CMA: 14.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
CMA' s 10-Year P/E(ttm) Range
Min: 7.78  Med: 12.91 Max: 58.45
Current: 14.12
7.78
58.45
Forward P/E 13.55
CMA's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
66% of the 718 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 11.82 vs. CMA: 13.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
PE(NRI) 13.90
CMA's PE(NRI) is ranked lower than
55% of the 1288 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 13.20 vs. CMA: 13.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
CMA' s 10-Year PE(NRI) Range
Min: 7.85  Med: 13.12 Max: 62.15
Current: 13.9
7.85
62.15
P/B 1.02
CMA's P/B is ranked higher than
54% of the 1381 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 1.05 vs. CMA: 1.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
CMA' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 0.38  Med: 1.14 Max: 2.15
Current: 1.02
0.38
2.15
P/S 3.07
CMA's P/S is ranked lower than
54% of the 1426 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 2.88 vs. CMA: 3.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
CMA' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 0.73  Med: 2.83 Max: 4.16
Current: 3.07
0.73
4.16
PFCF 13.08
CMA's PFCF is ranked lower than
59% of the 858 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 10.85 vs. CMA: 13.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
CMA' s 10-Year PFCF Range
Min: 2.86  Med: 11.49 Max: 300.67
Current: 13.08
2.86
300.67
POCF 11.69
CMA's POCF is ranked lower than
63% of the 954 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 9.17 vs. CMA: 11.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
CMA' s 10-Year POCF Range
Min: 2.36  Med: 9.37 Max: 59.15
Current: 11.69
2.36
59.15
EV-to-EBIT 5.48
CMA's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
90% of the 1297 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 13.56 vs. CMA: 5.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
CMA' s 10-Year EV-to-EBIT Range
Min: -3139.2  Med: 11.20 Max: 282.5
Current: 5.48
-3139.2
282.5
PEG 0.13
CMA's PEG is ranked higher than
98% of the 612 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 0.99 vs. CMA: 0.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only.
CMA' s 10-Year PEG Range
Min: 0.17  Med: 0.31 Max: 12.1
Current: 0.13
0.17
12.1
Shiller P/E 20.42
CMA's Shiller P/E is ranked lower than
67% of the 784 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 15.97 vs. CMA: 20.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
CMA' s 10-Year Shiller P/E Range
Min: 3.09  Med: 12.83 Max: 34.23
Current: 20.42
3.09
34.23

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 1.84
CMA's Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
69% of the 2262 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 2.73 vs. CMA: 1.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
CMA' s 10-Year Dividend Yield Range
Min: 0.45  Med: 1.74 Max: 17.02
Current: 1.84
0.45
17.02
Dividend Payout 0.26
CMA's Dividend Payout is ranked higher than
75% of the 1321 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 0.33 vs. CMA: 0.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout only.
CMA' s 10-Year Dividend Payout Range
Min: 0.13  Med: 0.37 Max: 3.47
Current: 0.26
0.13
3.47
Dividend growth (3y) 25.50
CMA's Dividend growth (3y) is ranked higher than
80% of the 671 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 7.50 vs. CMA: 25.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend growth (3y) only.
CMA' s 10-Year Dividend growth (3y) Range
Min: -56.1  Med: 7.70 Max: 40.1
Current: 25.5
-56.1
40.1
Yield on cost (5-Year) 7.93
CMA's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
85% of the 2265 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 3.15 vs. CMA: 7.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
CMA' s 10-Year Yield on cost (5-Year) Range
Min: 1.93  Med: 7.46 Max: 72.99
Current: 7.93
1.93
72.99
Share Buyback Rate 0.20
CMA's Share Buyback Rate is ranked higher than
82% of the 1012 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: -1.90 vs. CMA: 0.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Share Buyback Rate only.
CMA' s 10-Year Share Buyback Rate Range
Min: 24.2  Med: 0.20 Max: -29.1
Current: 0.2

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 1.14
CMA's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
52% of the 1349 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 1.15 vs. CMA: 1.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
CMA' s 10-Year Price/Tangible Book Range
Min: 0.55  Med: 1.75 Max: 4.3
Current: 1.14
0.55
4.3
Price/Projected FCF 0.74
CMA's Price/Projected FCF is ranked lower than
55% of the 806 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 0.67 vs. CMA: 0.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
CMA' s 10-Year Price/Projected FCF Range
Min: 0.2  Med: 0.67 Max: 0.96
Current: 0.74
0.2
0.96
Price/Median PS Value 1.08
CMA's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
53% of the 1310 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 1.05 vs. CMA: 1.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
CMA' s 10-Year Price/Median PS Value Range
Min: 0.37  Med: 1.11 Max: 2.01
Current: 1.08
0.37
2.01
Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value 0.68
CMA's Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value is ranked higher than
69% of the 371 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 0.92 vs. CMA: 0.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value only.
CMA' s 10-Year Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value Range
Min: 0.52  Med: 0.91 Max: 2.49
Current: 0.68
0.52
2.49
Price/Graham Number 0.83
CMA's Price/Graham Number is ranked higher than
50% of the 1192 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 0.82 vs. CMA: 0.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
CMA' s 10-Year Price/Graham Number Range
Min: 0.51  Med: 0.99 Max: 2.86
Current: 0.83
0.51
2.86
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 18.19
CMA's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
91% of the 1422 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 6.80 vs. CMA: 18.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
CMA' s 10-Year Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: 0.4  Med: 8.40 Max: 27.8
Current: 18.19
0.4
27.8
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 26.28
CMA's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
71% of the 785 Companies
in the Global Banks - Regional - US industry.

( Industry Median: 14.29 vs. CMA: 26.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
CMA' s 10-Year Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range
Min: -45.8  Med: 8.70 Max: 99.2
Current: 26.28
-45.8
99.2

Analyst Estimate

Dec15 Dec16 Dec17
Revenue(Mil) 2,714 2,908 3,143
EPS($) 2.81 3.25 3.86
EPS without NRI($) 2.81 3.25 3.86

Business Description

Industry: Banks » Banks - Regional - US
Compare:MTB, USB, PNC, PB, CFR » details
Traded in other countries:CA3.Germany,
Comerica Inc is incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware in 1973. The Company is a financial services company which operates in three business segments: the Business Bank, the Retail Bank, and Wealth Management. The Business Bank is mainly comprised of the several businesses which include middle market, commercial real estate, national dealer services, international finance, leasing, financial services, and technology and life sciences. This business segment meets the needs of medium-size businesses, multinational corporations and governmental entities by offering various products and services, including commercial loans and lines of credit, deposits, cash management, capital market products, international trade finance, letters of credit, foreign exchange management services and loan syndication services. The Retail Bank includes small business banking and personal financial services, consisting of consumer lending, consumer deposit gathering and mortgage loan origination. In addition to financial services provided to small business customers, this business segment offers consumer products, including deposit accounts, installment loans, credit cards, student loans, home equity lines of credit and residential mortgage loans. Wealth Management offers products and services consisting of fiduciary services, private banking, retirement services, investment management and advisory services, investment banking and brokerage services. This business segment also offers the sale of annuity products, as well as life, disability and long-term care insurance products. The Company's banking subsidiaries compete mainly with banks based in its main areas of operations in the United States for loans, deposits and trust accounts. The Company is subject to supervision and regulation at the federal level by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
» More Articles for CMA

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
The 16 Best Stocks For Value Investors This Week - 8/1/15 Aug 02 2015 
GuruFocus Interview: Deep Value Investor Chip Rewey of Third Avenue Jul 27 2015 
Third Avenue Value Fund Reports on Investment Insight in its 2015 Semi-Annual Report Jul 04 2015 
Third Avenue Value Fund Invests in Homebuilding Companies During Q2 Jul 01 2015 
Submit Your Investing Questions to Third Avenue's Chip Rewey for Exclusive Q&A Jun 12 2015 
Third Avenue's Value Fund Second Quarter 2015 Shareholder Letter Jun 08 2015 
Martin Whitman Adds to Holdings in Financial Services Companies Apr 09 2015 
Martin Whitman's recent trades Mar 17 2015 
Third Avenue Value Fund Comments on Comerica Inc Sep 12 2014 
Valuation of Martin Whitman’s Four New Buys Jul 10 2012 

More From Other Websites
Big investor banks on Comerica Aug 28 2015
Comerica Bank's Texas Index Sees Smallest Decline of 2015 Aug 26 2015
Comerica Bank's Texas Index Sees Smallest Decline of 2015 Aug 26 2015
Comerica Bank's California Index Sees Third Consecutive Gain Aug 26 2015
Comerica Bank's California Index Sees Third Consecutive Gain Aug 26 2015
Comerica Bank's Michigan Index Continues Strong Gains for Third Month Aug 26 2015
Comerica Bank's Michigan Index Continues Strong Gains for Third Month Aug 26 2015
6 Big Banks Under Book Value Worth Over $5 Billion Aug 25 2015
Banks face pressure Aug 24 2015
Comerica upgraded by Robert W. Baird Aug 24 2015
Comerica, Inc. Earnings Q2*, 2015 Aug 19 2015
Will China Kill the Bank Rally? Aug 13 2015
Patricia (Patti) K. Griswold Named Senior Vice President and Michigan Market Manager of Comerica... Aug 12 2015
Comerica Bank and RocketSpace Present: The 2015 Wearable FinTech Startup Challenge Aug 11 2015
Comerica Bank and RocketSpace Present: The 2015 Wearable FinTech Startup Challenge Aug 11 2015
COMERICA INC /NEW/ Financials Jul 31 2015
10-Q for Comerica, Inc. Jul 29 2015
Comerica Publishes Latest Corporate Sustainability Report Jul 29 2015
Comerica Publishes Latest Corporate Sustainability Report Jul 29 2015

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK