Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 2.65
CO's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
65% of the 74 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.70 vs. CO: 2.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
CO' s 10-Year Cash to Debt Range
Min: 1.86  Med: 12.18 Max: No Debt
Current: 2.65
Equity to Asset 0.38
CO's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
61% of the 71 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.44 vs. CO: 0.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
CO' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: 0.38  Med: 0.59 Max: 0.78
Current: 0.38
0.38
0.78
Interest Coverage 3.31
CO's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
86% of the 56 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 25.70 vs. CO: 3.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
CO' s 10-Year Interest Coverage Range
Min: 2.99  Med: 44.27 Max: 9999.99
Current: 3.31
2.99
9999.99
F-Score: 6
Z-Score: 1.92
WACC vs ROIC
13.15%
62.73%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 39.98
CO's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
97% of the 76 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 6.72 vs. CO: 39.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
CO' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: 35.44  Med: 37.16 Max: 40.49
Current: 39.98
35.44
40.49
Net-margin (%) 20.82
CO's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
92% of the 76 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 4.24 vs. CO: 20.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
CO' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: 18.8  Med: 23.03 Max: 34.69
Current: 20.82
18.8
34.69
ROE (%) 8.88
CO's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
56% of the 73 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 6.55 vs. CO: 8.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
CO' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: -4.86  Med: 9.90 Max: 11.82
Current: 8.88
-4.86
11.82
ROA (%) 3.47
CO's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
57% of the 76 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.45 vs. CO: 3.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
CO' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: -3.67  Med: 4.70 Max: 7.93
Current: 3.47
-3.67
7.93
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 44.02
CO's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
78% of the 76 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 13.02 vs. CO: 44.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
CO' s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: -10.49  Med: 53.60 Max: 62.56
Current: 44.02
-10.49
62.56
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 19.70
CO's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
90% of the 59 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.90 vs. CO: 19.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CO' s 10-Year Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: 0  Med: 0.00 Max: 22
Current: 19.7
0
22
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 13.70
CO's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
60% of the 43 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 9.50 vs. CO: 13.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CO' s 10-Year EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: 13.7  Med: 40.10 Max: 358.3
Current: 13.7
13.7
358.3
» CO's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2014

CO Guru Trades in Q2 2014

Jim Simons 131,800 sh (-2.01%)
» More
Q3 2014

CO Guru Trades in Q3 2014

Jim Simons 170,200 sh (+29.14%)
» More
Q4 2014

CO Guru Trades in Q4 2014

Jim Simons 181,700 sh (+6.76%)
» More
Q1 2015

CO Guru Trades in Q1 2015

Jim Simons 304,600 sh (+67.64%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CO

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 23.96
CO's P/E(ttm) is ranked lower than
53% of the 55 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 23.70 vs. CO: 23.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
CO' s 10-Year P/E(ttm) Range
Min: 8.33  Med: 16.80 Max: 1151.82
Current: 23.96
8.33
1151.82
Forward P/E 34.84
CO's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
91% of the 32 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 15.36 vs. CO: 34.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
PE(NRI) 21.30
CO's PE(NRI) is ranked higher than
57% of the 53 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 23.70 vs. CO: 21.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
CO' s 10-Year PE(NRI) Range
Min: 8.33  Med: 15.68 Max: 878.54
Current: 21.3
8.33
878.54
P/B 1.87
CO's P/B is ranked higher than
61% of the 71 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.37 vs. CO: 1.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
CO' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 0.93  Med: 1.40 Max: 5.17
Current: 1.87
0.93
5.17
P/S 4.43
CO's P/S is ranked lower than
88% of the 76 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.26 vs. CO: 4.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
CO' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 2.28  Med: 3.44 Max: 21.52
Current: 4.43
2.28
21.52
PFCF 10.10
CO's PFCF is ranked higher than
84% of the 37 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 24.82 vs. CO: 10.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
CO' s 10-Year PFCF Range
Min: 6.07  Med: 10.18 Max: 25.32
Current: 10.1
6.07
25.32
POCF 9.33
CO's POCF is ranked higher than
77% of the 52 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 14.70 vs. CO: 9.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
CO' s 10-Year POCF Range
Min: 4.14  Med: 7.81 Max: 10.94
Current: 9.33
4.14
10.94
EV-to-EBIT 5.16
CO's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
93% of the 58 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 18.36 vs. CO: 5.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
CO' s 10-Year EV-to-EBIT Range
Min: 2  Med: 4.20 Max: 112.5
Current: 5.16
2
112.5
Shiller P/E 29.64
CO's Shiller P/E is ranked lower than
63% of the 35 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 25.13 vs. CO: 29.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
CO' s 10-Year Shiller P/E Range
Min: 20.24  Med: 28.32 Max: 36.08
Current: 29.64
20.24
36.08
Current Ratio 6.07
CO's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
93% of the 72 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.45 vs. CO: 6.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
CO' s 10-Year Current Ratio Range
Min: 2.84  Med: 5.29 Max: 73.11
Current: 6.07
2.84
73.11
Quick Ratio 6.01
CO's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
93% of the 72 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.17 vs. CO: 6.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
CO' s 10-Year Quick Ratio Range
Min: 2.81  Med: 5.23 Max: 73.11
Current: 6.01
2.81
73.11
Days Inventory 78.72
CO's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
85% of the 62 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 16.16 vs. CO: 78.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
CO' s 10-Year Days Inventory Range
Min: 14.08  Med: 27.67 Max: 71.78
Current: 78.72
14.08
71.78
Days Sales Outstanding 68.53
CO's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
83% of the 60 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 25.31 vs. CO: 68.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
CO' s 10-Year Days Sales Outstanding Range
Min: 50.7  Med: 75.80 Max: 85.62
Current: 68.53
50.7
85.62

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 2.06
CO's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
60% of the 60 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.90 vs. CO: 2.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
CO' s 10-Year Price/Tangible Book Range
Min: 1.07  Med: 1.48 Max: 5.4
Current: 2.06
1.07
5.4
Price/Projected FCF 0.75
CO's Price/Projected FCF is ranked higher than
81% of the 43 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.50 vs. CO: 0.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
CO' s 10-Year Price/Projected FCF Range
Min: 0.54  Med: 0.62 Max: 0.75
Current: 0.75
0.54
0.75
Price/Median PS Value 1.32
CO's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
62% of the 71 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.18 vs. CO: 1.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
CO' s 10-Year Price/Median PS Value Range
Min: 0.67  Med: 1.01 Max: 5.3
Current: 1.32
0.67
5.3
Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value 1.78
CO's Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value is ranked lower than
67% of the 15 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.30 vs. CO: 1.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value only.
CO' s 10-Year Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value Range
Min: 0.81  Med: 1.05 Max: 1.28
Current: 1.78
0.81
1.28
Price/Graham Number 1.41
CO's Price/Graham Number is ranked higher than
68% of the 44 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.71 vs. CO: 1.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
CO' s 10-Year Price/Graham Number Range
Min: 0.66  Med: 1.06 Max: 11.72
Current: 1.41
0.66
11.72
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 20.11
CO's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
95% of the 75 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 3.70 vs. CO: 20.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
CO' s 10-Year Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: 0.9  Med: 23.90 Max: 51
Current: 20.11
0.9
51
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 16.94
CO's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
76% of the 41 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 4.40 vs. CO: 16.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
CO' s 10-Year Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range
Min: 1  Med: 1.90 Max: 22.9
Current: 16.94
1
22.9

Analyst Estimate

Mar15 Mar16 Mar17
Revenue(Mil) 102 111 128
EPS($) 0.23 0.18 0.30
EPS without NRI($) 0.23 0.18 0.30

Business Description

Industry: Personal Services » Personal Services
Compare:STAN, HRB, CSV, TUC, SCI » details
Traded in other countries:6CB.Germany,
China Cord Blood Corporation was formerly known as Pantheon China Acquisition Corp. On November 3, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement and plan of merger, conversion and share exchange (Merger Agreement) with China Cord Blood Services Corporation (CCBS) and certain shareholders of CCBS, including Golden Meditech Company Limited. The Plan of Merger was approved on June 29, 2009. The closing of business combination transaction between Pantheon and CCBS took place on June 30, 2009, and Pantheon changed its name to China Cord Blood Corporation. China Cord Blood Corporation is now the largest cord blood bank operator in China, with exclusive licenses to operate in Beijing Municipality and Guangdong Province. The company provides cord blood banking services in China. It provides cord blood processing and storage services for expectant parents interested in capturing the opportunities made available by evolving medical treatments and technologies such as cord blood transplants. It also preserves cord blood units donated by the public, provide matching services on such donated units and deliver matching units to patients in need of transplants. Its Beijing-based subsidiary, Jiachenhong, was the operator of the first licensed cord blood bank in China. The PRC government only grants one cord blood banking license per province or municipality. According to the Notice on Guiding Principles Regarding Planning and Establishment of the Blood Station published by China's MOH in December 2005, and also an extension notice published in February 2011, the PRC government intends to authorize up to ten cord blood banks. To date, it has authorized seven such licenses. Its operations currently benefit from multiple exclusive cord blood banking licenses issued in China, including its licenses for Beijing, Guangdong and Zhejiang. It also has a 19.9% equity interest in Qilu, the operator of the exclusive licensed cord blood bank in Shandong province. Its cord blood banking operations primarily consist of its subscription services, which involve the preservation of cord blood for expectant parents as a precautionary healthcare measure for the benefit of their children and other family members. Its subscription services accounted for 99.5%, 99.4% and 99.5% of its revenues for the years ended March 31, 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively. Its subscribers are required to enter into a subscription contract with it prior to the birth of their children. The contract provides for the collection of cord blood from their newborns at one of its collaborating hospitals and preservation of the cord blood for an initial storage period up to 18 years. On the 18th anniversary, the child, who will have reached adulthood, will have the exclusive right to decide whether to extend the subscription for its services or to relinquish ownership of his or her cord blood for donation to its banks.
» More Articles for CO

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Cord Blood Sep 01 2012 
52 Week High Companies: V, FAST, DLTR, CO, TJX Dec 19 2011 

More From Other Websites
Chinese Trample U.S. Investors to Get Home Jun 26 2015
China Cord Blood downgraded by ROTH Capital Jun 26 2015
China Cord Blood Corp Earnings Call scheduled for 8:00 am ET today Jun 19 2015
China Cord Blood posts 4Q profit Jun 18 2015
China Cord Blood posts 4Q profit Jun 18 2015
China Cord Blood Corporation Reports Financial Results for the Fourth Quarter and Full Year of... Jun 18 2015
China Cord Blood Corporation Reports Financial Results for the Fourth Quarter and Full Year of... Jun 18 2015
Q4 2015 China Cord Blood Corp Earnings Release - After Market Close Jun 18 2015
China Cord Blood Corporation to Report Fourth Quarter and Full Year of Fiscal 2015 Financial Results Jun 09 2015
China Cord Blood Corporation to Report Fourth Quarter and Full Year of Fiscal 2015 Financial Results Jun 09 2015
China Cord Blood Corporation’s Special Committee Appoints Independent Financial Advisor and Legal... Jun 02 2015
China Cord Blood Corporation's Special Committee Appoints Independent Financial Advisor and Legal... Jun 02 2015
China Cord Blood Corporation Announces Resignation of an Independent Director May 14 2015
China Cord Blood Corporation Announces Resignation of an Independent Director May 14 2015
China Cord Blood Corporation Receives Notice of Transactions Regarding its 7% Senior Convertible... May 13 2015
China Cord Blood Corporation Receives Notice of Transactions Regarding its 7% Senior Convertible... May 08 2015
China Cord Blood Corporation Receives Notice of a Transaction Regarding its 7% Senior Convertible... May 04 2015
China Cord Blood Corporation Receives Notice of a Transaction Regarding its 7% Senior Convertible... May 04 2015
April 30, 2015 Open Letter to the Board of China Cord Blood Corp from Jayhawk Capital Apr 30 2015
China Cord Blood Corporation Announces Formation of a Special Committee to Evaluate Non-Binding... Apr 29 2015

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK