Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 3.11
CO's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
61% of the 90 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.99 vs. CO: 3.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
CO' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.86  Med: 7.53 Max: No Debt
Current: 3.11
Equity to Asset 0.37
CO's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
66% of the 91 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.50 vs. CO: 0.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
CO' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.37  Med: 0.45 Max: 0.78
Current: 0.37
0.37
0.78
Interest Coverage 1.77
CO's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
89% of the 74 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 15.12 vs. CO: 1.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
CO' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.32  Med: 41.02 Max: 9999.99
Current: 1.77
2.32
9999.99
F-Score: 4
Z-Score: 1.82
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 28.87
CO's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
88% of the 91 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 7.41 vs. CO: 28.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
CO' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 35.44  Med: 37.08 Max: 40.49
Current: 28.87
35.44
40.49
Net-margin (%) 13.67
CO's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
82% of the 91 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 4.53 vs. CO: 13.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
CO' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 16.89  Med: 22.20 Max: 34.69
Current: 13.67
16.89
34.69
ROE (%) 5.56
CO's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
56% of the 87 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 10.30 vs. CO: 5.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
CO' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.86  Med: 9.29 Max: 11.82
Current: 5.56
-4.86
11.82
ROA (%) 2.05
CO's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
58% of the 91 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.87 vs. CO: 2.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
CO' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.67  Med: 4.00 Max: 7.93
Current: 2.05
-3.67
7.93
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 42.07
CO's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
71% of the 91 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 19.89 vs. CO: 42.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
CO' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -10.49  Med: 47.81 Max: 62.56
Current: 42.07
-10.49
62.56
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 17.50
CO's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
85% of the 66 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 3.60 vs. CO: 17.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CO' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 8.75 Max: 24.5
Current: 17.5
0
24.5
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 17.50
CO's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
75% of the 57 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 5.50 vs. CO: 17.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CO' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 17.5  Med: 24.30 Max: 35.3
Current: 17.5
17.5
35.3
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) -9.90
CO's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
67% of the 48 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 4.10 vs. CO: -9.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CO' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9.9  Med: 29.90 Max: 322
Current: -9.9
-9.9
322
» CO's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: Est. 2016-08-20)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Oprt. Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2015

CO Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Jim Simons 501,900 sh (+64.77%)
» More
Q3 2015

CO Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Jim Simons 564,000 sh (+12.37%)
» More
Q4 2015

CO Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Jim Simons 662,855 sh (+17.53%)
» More
Q1 2016

CO Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Jim Simons 721,900 sh (+8.91%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CO

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Personal Services » Personal Services
Compare:NYSE:CSV, NYSE:RGS, NAS:TAX, NAS:NTRI, NYSE:WTW, NAS:STNR, OTCPK:MSLP, OTCPK:CCGI, OTCPK:CBDS, AMEX:EVI, OTCPK:PACI, OTCPK:PKTEF, OTCPK:GTVI, OTCPK:CORFF, OTCPK:CICC, OTCPK:KMWE, NYSE:STON, OTCPK:BFGIF, OTCPK:FSHUF, NAS:SFLY » details
Traded in other countries:6CB.Germany,
China Cord Blood Corp provides cord blood banking services. The Company provides cord blood processing and storage services for expectant parents interested in capturing the evolving medical treatments & technologies such as cord blood transplants.

China Cord Blood Corporation was formerly known as Pantheon China Acquisition Corp. On November 3, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement and plan of merger, conversion and share exchange (Merger Agreement) with China Cord Blood Services Corporation (CCBS) and certain shareholders of CCBS, including Golden Meditech Company Limited. The Plan of Merger was approved on June 29, 2009. The closing of business combination transaction between Pantheon and CCBS took place on June 30, 2009, and Pantheon changed its name to China Cord Blood Corporation. China Cord Blood Corporation is now the largest cord blood bank operator in China, with exclusive licenses to operate in Beijing Municipality and Guangdong Province. The company provides cord blood banking services in China. It provides cord blood processing and storage services for expectant parents interested in capturing the opportunities made available by evolving medical treatments and technologies such as cord blood transplants. It also preserves cord blood units donated by the public, provide matching services on such donated units and deliver matching units to patients in need of transplants. Its Beijing-based subsidiary, Jiachenhong, was the operator of the first licensed cord blood bank in China. The PRC government only grants one cord blood banking license per province or municipality. According to the Notice on Guiding Principles Regarding Planning and Establishment of the Blood Station published by China's MOH in December 2005, and also an extension notice published in February 2011, the PRC government intends to authorize up to ten cord blood banks. To date, it has authorized seven such licenses. Its operations currently benefit from multiple exclusive cord blood banking licenses issued in China, including its licenses for Beijing, Guangdong and Zhejiang. It also has a 19.9% equity interest in Qilu, the operator of the exclusive licensed cord blood bank in Shandong province. Its cord blood banking operations primarily consist of its subscription services, which involve the preservation of cord blood for expectant parents as a precautionary healthcare measure for the benefit of their children and other family members. Its subscription services accounted for 99.5%, 99.4% and 99.5% of its revenues for the years ended March 31, 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively. Its subscribers are required to enter into a subscription contract with it prior to the birth of their children. The contract provides for the collection of cord blood from their newborns at one of its collaborating hospitals and preservation of the cord blood for an initial storage period up to 18 years. On the 18th anniversary, the child, who will have reached adulthood, will have the exclusive right to decide whether to extend the subscription for its services or to relinquish ownership of his or her cord blood for donation to its banks.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 28.75
CO's P/E(ttm) is ranked lower than
76% of the 70 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 19.20 vs. CO: 28.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
CO' s P/E(ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.33  Med: 17.51 Max: 1151.82
Current: 28.75
8.33
1151.82
Forward P/E 33.90
CO's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
91% of the 23 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 14.51 vs. CO: 33.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
PE(NRI) 28.75
CO's PE(NRI) is ranked lower than
74% of the 70 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 18.94 vs. CO: 28.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
CO' s PE(NRI) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.33  Med: 17.43 Max: 878.54
Current: 28.75
8.33
878.54
P/B 1.63
CO's P/B is ranked higher than
58% of the 85 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.03 vs. CO: 1.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
CO' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.93  Med: 1.48 Max: 5.18
Current: 1.63
0.93
5.18
P/S 4.02
CO's P/S is ranked lower than
85% of the 84 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.12 vs. CO: 4.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
CO' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.31  Med: 3.94 Max: 21.39
Current: 4.02
2.31
21.39
EV-to-EBIT 3.05
CO's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
93% of the 68 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 12.46 vs. CO: 3.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
CO' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -135.6  Med: 3.90 Max: 162.9
Current: 3.05
-135.6
162.9
EV-to-EBITDA 3.05
CO's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
91% of the 69 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 10.47 vs. CO: 3.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
CO' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -135.6  Med: 3.90 Max: 162.9
Current: 3.05
-135.6
162.9
PEG 1.19
CO's PEG is ranked higher than
69% of the 29 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.85 vs. CO: 1.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only.
CO' s PEG Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.5  Med: 1.50 Max: 1.93
Current: 1.19
0.5
1.93
Current Ratio 7.02
CO's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
95% of the 87 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.57 vs. CO: 7.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
CO' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.84  Med: 5.61 Max: 73.11
Current: 7.02
2.84
73.11
Quick Ratio 6.95
CO's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
95% of the 87 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.17 vs. CO: 6.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
CO' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.81  Med: 5.56 Max: 73.11
Current: 6.95
2.81
73.11
Days Inventory 69.63
CO's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
82% of the 74 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 14.60 vs. CO: 69.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
CO' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.08  Med: 28.24 Max: 77.86
Current: 69.63
14.08
77.86
Days Sales Outstanding 67.30
CO's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
87% of the 75 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 22.19 vs. CO: 67.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
CO' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 50.7  Med: 72.60 Max: 85.62
Current: 67.3
50.7
85.62
Days Payable 32.80
CO's Days Payable is ranked lower than
51% of the 69 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 34.89 vs. CO: 32.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
CO' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 23.8  Med: 31.95 Max: 35.81
Current: 32.8
23.8
35.81

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Net Cash 95.83
CO's Price/Net Cash is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 11 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 11.00 vs. CO: 95.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Net Cash only.
CO' s Price/Net Cash Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.44  Med: 13.58 Max: 107.14
Current: 95.83
1.44
107.14
Price/Net Current Asset Value 12.23
CO's Price/Net Current Asset Value is ranked lower than
69% of the 29 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 7.48 vs. CO: 12.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Net Current Asset Value only.
CO' s Price/Net Current Asset Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.43  Med: 6.21 Max: 63.88
Current: 12.23
1.43
63.88
Price/Tangible Book 1.71
CO's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
57% of the 70 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.02 vs. CO: 1.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
CO' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.07  Med: 1.49 Max: 5.41
Current: 1.71
1.07
5.41
Price/Projected FCF 0.86
CO's Price/Projected FCF is ranked higher than
74% of the 50 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.32 vs. CO: 0.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
CO' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.78  Med: 0.95 Max: 1.36
Current: 0.86
0.78
1.36
Price/Median PS Value 1.03
CO's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
55% of the 75 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.00 vs. CO: 1.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
CO' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.59  Med: 0.96 Max: 4.61
Current: 1.03
0.59
4.61
Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value 1.67
CO's Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value is ranked lower than
59% of the 17 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.30 vs. CO: 1.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value only.
CO' s Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.7  Med: 1.20 Max: 1.85
Current: 1.67
0.7
1.85
Price/Graham Number 1.49
CO's Price/Graham Number is ranked lower than
51% of the 51 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.38 vs. CO: 1.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
CO' s Price/Graham Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.7  Med: 1.16 Max: 12.26
Current: 1.49
0.7
12.26
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 32.89
CO's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
94% of the 84 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 6.40 vs. CO: 32.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
CO' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.6  Med: 25.55 Max: 55.5
Current: 32.89
0.6
55.5
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 16.83
CO's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
70% of the 44 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 7.13 vs. CO: 16.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
CO' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1  Med: 2.10 Max: 33.1
Current: 16.83
1
33.1

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $104.0
EPS (TTM) $ 0.20
Beta1.10
Short Percentage of Float0.32%
52-Week Range $4.61 - 7.69
Shares Outstanding (Mil)73.00

Analyst Estimate

Mar17
Revenue (Mil $)
EPS ($) 0.13
EPS w/o NRI ($) 0.13
EPS Growth Rate
(3Y to 5Y Estimate)
N/A
» More Articles for CO

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
52 Week High Companies: V, FAST, DLTR, CO, TJX Dec 19 2011 

More From Other Websites
China Cord Blood Corp. :CO-US: Earnings Analysis: Q4, 2016 By the Numbers : June 28, 2016 Jun 28 2016
China Cord Blood Corp Earnings Call scheduled for 8:00 am ET today Jun 15 2016
China Cord Blood posts 4Q profit Jun 14 2016
China Cord Blood Corporation Reports Financial Results for the Fourth Quarter and Full Year of... Jun 14 2016
Q4 2016 China Cord Blood Corp Earnings Release - After Market Close Jun 14 2016
China Cord Blood Corporation to Report Fourth Quarter and Full Year Fiscal 2016 Financial Results Jun 07 2016
China Cord Blood Corp. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : CO-US : May 17, 2016 May 17 2016
April 5, 2016 Open Letter to the Special Committee of the Board of China Cord Blood Corp from... Apr 05 2016
China Cord Blood Corp. – Value Analysis (NYSE:CO) : March 16, 2016 Mar 16 2016
China Cord Blood Corp. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : CO-US : March 15,... Mar 15 2016
China Cord Blood Corp. :CO-US: Earnings Analysis: Q3, 2016 By the Numbers Mar 04 2016
China Cord Blood posts 3Q profit Feb 29 2016
China Cord Blood Corporation Reports Financial Results for the Third Quarter and First Nine Months... Feb 29 2016
China Cord Blood Corporation to Report Third Quarter and First Nine Months of Fiscal 2016 Financial... Feb 22 2016
Golden Meditech Enters into Agreements with Nanjing Xinjiekou to Sell China Cord Blood Corporation Jan 07 2016
China Cord Blood Corp. – Value Analysis (NYSE:CO) : January 6, 2016 Jan 06 2016
China Cord Blood Corp. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : January 5, 2016 Jan 05 2016
China Cord Blood Corp. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : December 25, 2015 Dec 25 2015
China Cord Blood Corp. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : December 14, 2015 Dec 14 2015
China Cord Blood Corporation Announces Results of 2015 Annual General Meeting Dec 10 2015

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)