Switch to:
Also traded in: Argentina, Germany, Mexico, Switzerland, UK, USA

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.51
CS's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
73% of the 1639 Companies
in the Global Banks - Global industry.

( Industry Median: 1.98 vs. CS: 0.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
CS' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.18  Med: 0.39 Max: N/A
Current: 0.51
Equity to Asset 0.06
CS's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
86% of the 1660 Companies
in the Global Banks - Global industry.

( Industry Median: 0.10 vs. CS: 0.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
CS' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.03  Med: 0.03 Max: 0.06
Current: 0.06
0.03
0.06
F-Score: 2
M-Score: -2.85
WACC vs ROIC
5.76%
-5.00%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) -33.61
CS's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
96% of the 1678 Companies
in the Global Banks - Global industry.

( Industry Median: 30.78 vs. CS: -33.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
CS' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -160.79  Med: 14.83 Max: 37.04
Current: -33.61
-160.79
37.04
Net-margin (%) -30.59
CS's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
96% of the 1677 Companies
in the Global Banks - Global industry.

( Industry Median: 22.15 vs. CS: -30.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
CS' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -88.67  Med: 8.27 Max: 29.34
Current: -30.59
-88.67
29.34
ROE (%) -16.53
CS's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
97% of the 1675 Companies
in the Global Banks - Global industry.

( Industry Median: 8.39 vs. CS: -16.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
CS' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -21.77  Med: 5.61 Max: 26.41
Current: -16.53
-21.77
26.41
ROA (%) -0.90
CS's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
95% of the 1683 Companies
in the Global Banks - Global industry.

( Industry Median: 0.89 vs. CS: -0.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
CS' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.9  Med: 0.24 Max: 0.87
Current: -0.9
-0.9
0.87
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) -6.90
CS's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
85% of the 1371 Companies
in the Global Banks - Global industry.

( Industry Median: 3.10 vs. CS: -6.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CS' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -30.1  Med: -9.5 Max: 34.3
Current: -6.9
-30.1
34.3
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) -17.30
CS's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
89% of the 1253 Companies
in the Global Banks - Global industry.

( Industry Median: 5.80 vs. CS: -17.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CS' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -29.3  Med: -8.1 Max: 268.8
Current: -17.3
-29.3
268.8
» CS's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-02-15)


Revenue & Net Income
Equity & Asset
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Oprt. Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q4 2015

CS Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Charles Brandes 2,949,132 sh (+121.44%)
David Dreman Sold Out
Sarah Ketterer Sold Out
Dodge & Cox 789,194 sh (-2.71%)
Ken Fisher 9,971,187 sh (-4.05%)
Jeff Auxier 205,918 sh (-9.39%)
John Buckingham 84,242 sh (-11.66%)
» More
Q1 2016

CS Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Jim Simons 23,149 sh (New)
David Dreman 4,127 sh (New)
Charles Brandes 5,567,313 sh (+88.78%)
Dodge & Cox 878,687 sh (+11.34%)
Ken Fisher 10,069,910 sh (+0.99%)
Jeff Auxier 206,518 sh (+0.29%)
Paul Tudor Jones 81,700 sh (unchged)
John Buckingham 75,469 sh (-10.41%)
» More
Q2 2016

CS Guru Trades in Q2 2016

HOTCHKIS & WILEY 14,989 sh (New)
Jim Simons 1,082,289 sh (+4575.32%)
Dodge & Cox 1,424,729 sh (+62.14%)
Charles Brandes 6,299,201 sh (+13.15%)
Ken Fisher 10,318,911 sh (+2.47%)
Jeff Auxier 211,518 sh (+2.42%)
John Buckingham 75,649 sh (+0.24%)
David Dreman 1,519 sh (-63.19%)
» More
Q3 2016

CS Guru Trades in Q3 2016

NWQ Managers 185,571 sh (New)
Jim Simons 1,694,158 sh (+56.53%)
Charles Brandes 6,558,941 sh (+4.12%)
Jeff Auxier 209,318 sh (-1.04%)
David Dreman 1,453 sh (-4.34%)
John Buckingham 72,139 sh (-4.64%)
Dodge & Cox 1,202,216 sh (-15.62%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 10,734 sh (-28.39%)
Ken Fisher 1,332,255 sh (-87.09%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CS

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Banks » Banks - Global    NAICS: 522110    SIC: 6211
Compare:NYSE:RBS, OTCPK:SVNLY, OTCPK:SCBFF, NYSE:CM, OTCPK:FANDY, OTCPK:MLYBY, NYSE:BMO, NYSE:RY/PT, OTCPK:NTIOF, OTCPK:BCLYF, NYSE:BBVA, OTCPK:JBAXY, NAS:EWBC, NYSE:SMFG, OTCPK:INGVF, OTCPK:NBGGY, NYSE:NTB, OTCPK:LFGP, OTCPK:GHDS, OTCPK:HXPN » details
Traded in other countries:CS.Argentina, CSX.Germany, CS N.Mexico, CSGN.Switzerland, 0KVC.UK, CSGKF.USA,
Credit Suisse Group AG provides banking and financial services. It operates in two segments; Private Banking & Wealth Management and Investment Banking.

Credit Suisse Group AG was incorporated on March 3, 1982. The Company holds direct or indirect interests in all types of businesses in Switzerland and abroad, in particular in the areas of banking, finance, asset management and insurance. The Company's business consists of two operating divisions; Private Banking & Wealth Management and Investment Banking. Through Private Banking & Wealth Management the company offers advice and financial solutions to private, corporate and institutional clients. The Private Banking & Wealth Management division comprises the Wealth Management Clients, Corporate & Institutional Clients and Asset Management businesses. Wealth Management Clients serves ultra-high-net-worth and high-net-worth individuals around the globe and private clients in Switzerland. Corporate & Institutional Clients serves the needs of corporations and institutional clients, mainly in Switzerland. Asset Management offers investment products and solutions across asset classes and for all investment styles, serving governments, institutions, corporations and individuals worldwide. Investment Banking offers investment banking and securities products and services to corporate, institutional and government clients. Services include debt and equity underwriting, sales and trading, M&A advice, divestitures, corporate sales, restructuring and investment research.

Guru Investment Theses on Credit Suisse Group AG

Bill Nygren and David Herro Comment on Credit Suisse - Oct 10, 2016

Credit Suisse (NYSE:CS), a Swiss financial services group, was the largest detractor from performance for the fiscal year. Credit Suisse’s share price has been weak over the past year for multiple reasons. The company’s investment banking results have struggled, although we recognize the underperformance is partially due to restructuring activity and we expect performance to strengthen once restructuring is complete. One-off expenses related to litigation, pension true-up charges and write-downs on certain credit assets also hurt performance. Additionally, the U.K.’s decision to leave the European Union negatively impacted the share price. Credit Suisse’s management has responded to these challenges with a series of restructuring measures. Its management has made progress expanding its wealth management franchise, which we believe is a good move since that business is fee based, requires little capital and has very good secular growth trends. Additionally, Credit Suisse has reduced its exposure to the global markets business, which has enabled it to de-risk its balance sheet and operate with a more efficient cost structure. Credit Suisse’s management has confirmed the restructuring of its global markets business is nearing completion and should improve profitability over the coming quarters. Credit Suisse’s common equity Tier 1 ratio of 11.8%, above the 10% minimum requirement, should increase even more on the back of higher consolidated profitability.

From Bill Nygren (Trades, Portfolio) and David Herro (Trades, Portfolio)'s Oakmark Global Select Fund third quarter 2016 commentary.

Check out Bill Nygren,David Herro latest stock trades

David Herro Comments on Credit Suisse - Oct 10, 2016

Credit Suisse (NYSE:CS), a Swiss financial services group, was the largest detractor from performance for the fiscal year. Credit Suisse’s share price has been weak over the past year for multiple reasons. The company’s investment banking results have struggled, although we recognize that the underperformance is partially due to restructuring activity and we expect performance to strengthen once restructuring is complete. One-off expenses related to litigation, pension true-up charges and write-downs on certain credit assets also hurt performance. Additionally, the U.K.’s decision to leave the European Union negatively impacted the share price. Credit Suisse’s management has responded to these challenges with a series of restructuring measures. Its management has made progress expanding its wealth management franchise, which we believe is a good move since that business is fee based, requires little capital and has very good secular growth trends. Additionally, Credit Suisse has reduced its exposure to the global markets business, which has enabled it to de-risk its balance sheet and operate with a more efficient cost structure. Credit Suisse’s management has confirmed the restructuring of its global markets business is nearing completion and should improve profitability over the coming quarters. Credit Suisse’s common equity Tier 1 ratio of 11.8%, above the 10% minimum requirement, should increase even more on the back of higher consolidated profitability.

From David Herro (Trades, Portfolio)'s Oakmark International Fund third quarter 2016 commentary.

Check out David Herro latest stock trades

David Herro and Bill Nygren Comments on Credit Suisse - Jul 12, 2016

Credit Suisse (NYSE:CS), one of Switzerland’s top financial services groups, was the largest detractor from performance for the quarter, declining 22%. Although the U.K.’s decision to leave the EU has negatively impacted Credit Suisse Group’s share price, it is important to remember that the bank derives only 2% of its revenues from the U.K., while 13% of its costs are denominated in pound sterling currency, the net result of which may be somewhat positive for profitability. While the decision to leave the EU has caused notable market upheaval, global market declines were actually more extreme in the first few months of 2016 due to significant commodity price weakness, concerns regarding slowed economic growth in the U.S. and China, and monetary decisions by major central banks. Even so, Credit Suisse was able to grow net new money by 6.1% in the first quarter, which was meaningfully better than the 3.8% we estimated for the full fiscal year and higher than our expected normal run-rate of 5%. Additionally, we believe its overall first quarter results were good. Performance in its investment bank division lagged behind the industry, however we recognize that the underperformance is partially due to restructuring activity and we expect performance to improve when restructuring is complete. Also during the first quarter, Credit Suisse realized about half of its intended CHF 1.4 billion in cost cuts, which was ahead of schedule. Although the company’s near-term results may suffer, it is too early to know the extent to which the U.K.’s EU exit will affect Credit Suisse. The company reports its second-quarter financial results in late July, at which time we’ll have a clearer view.

From David Herro (Trades, Portfolio) and Bill Nygren (Trades, Portfolio)'s Oakmark Global Select Fund second quarter 2016 commentary.

Check out Bill Nygren,David Herro latest stock trades

David Herro Comments on Credit Suisse - Jul 12, 2016

Credit Suisse (NYSE:CS), one of Switzerland’s top financial services groups, was the largest detractor from performance for the quarter, declining 22%. Although the U.K.’s decision to leave the EU has negatively impacted Credit Suisse Group’s share price, it is important to remember that the bank derives only 2% of its revenues from the U.K., while 13% of its costs are denominated in pound sterling currency—the net result of which may be somewhat positive for profitability. While the decision to leave the EU has caused notable market upheaval, global market declines were actually more extreme in the first few months of 2016 due to significant commodity price weakness, concerns regarding slowed economic growth in the U.S. and China, and monetary decisions by major central banks. Even so, Credit Suisse was able to grow net new money by 6.1% in the first quarter, which was meaningfully better than the 3.8% we estimated for the full fiscal year and higher than our expected normal run-rate of 5%. Additionally, we believe its overall first quarter results were good. Performance in its investment bank division lagged behind the industry, however we recognize that the underperformance is partially due to restructuring activity and we expect performance to improve when restructuring is complete. Also during the first quarter, Credit Suisse realized about half of its intended CHF 1.4 billion in cost cuts, which was ahead of schedule. Although the company’s near-term results may suffer, it is too early to know the extent to which the U.K.’s EU exit will affect Credit Suisse. The company reports its second-quarter financial results in late July, at which time we’ll have a clearer view.



From David Herro (Trades, Portfolio)'s Oakmark International Small Cap Fund second quarter 2016 commentary.



Check out David Herro latest stock trades

Brandes Investments Comments on Credit Suisse - Jun 15, 2016

Credit Suisse (NYSE:CS) declined over 30% during the quarter as the market remained concerned about the company’s restructuring/turnaround and the possible negative effect on financial results over the next year. Nonetheless, we continue to believe Credit Suisse has an economically attractive business model and is significantly discounted at its current valuation of 0.7x tangible book value. Accordingly, we increased our allocation during the quarter.



From Brandes' Global Equity Fund first quarter 2016 commentary.



Check out Charles Brandes latest stock trades

Brandes Funds Comments on Credit Suisse - May 24, 2016

Credit Suisse (NYSE:CS) saw its shares fall over 30% in the quarter as the market remained concerned about the company’s restructuring and its negative effect on financial results over the next year. Nonetheless, we continue to believe Credit Suisse has an economically attractive business model and is significantly discounted at its valuation of 0.7x tangible book value as of March 31.



From Brandes International Equity Fund first quarter 2016 commentary.



Check out Charles Brandes latest stock trades

Bill Nygren, David Herro Comment on Credit Suisse - Apr 11, 2016

Credit Suisse (NYSE:CS) (Switzerland) was the largest detractor for the quarter, declining by 34%. Although CEO Tidjane Thiam warned that fourth-quarter earnings would be weak, some one-off expenses related to litigation, pension true-up charges and write-downs on certain credit assets were negative surprises during the period. However, this has caused the management team to accelerate the restructuring and reduction of non-core investment banking lines of businesses. The goal is to emphasize the wealth management business that has very good secular growth trends, is fee based and requires little capital. We believe Credit Suisse’s capital position remains solid with a Tier 1 capital ratio of 11.4% as of year-end, which is in excess of regulators’ 10% requirement. Despite some near-term challenges, we continue to believe that over time shareholders will benefit from CEO Thiam’s initiatives to correct some legacy missteps, grow the business and reduce costs.



From Bill Nygren (Trades, Portfolio) and David Herro (Trades, Portfolio)'s Oakmark Global Select Fund: First Quarter 2016 Commentary​.



Check out Bill Nygren,David Herro latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Credit Suisse Group AG

David Herro's Oakmark Global Fund 3rd Quarter Commentary Review of quarter and holdings
An Atypical September Quarter
Read more...
Bill Nygren and David Herro Comment on Credit Suisse Guru stock highlight
Credit Suisse (NYSE:CS), a Swiss financial services group, was the largest detractor from performance for the fiscal year. Credit Suisse’s share price has been weak over the past year for multiple reasons. The company’s investment banking results have struggled, although we recognize the underperformance is partially due to restructuring activity and we expect performance to strengthen once restructuring is complete. One-off expenses related to litigation, pension true-up charges and write-downs on certain credit assets also hurt performance. Additionally, the U.K.’s decision to leave the European Union negatively impacted the share price. Credit Suisse’s management has responded to these challenges with a series of restructuring measures. Its management has made progress expanding its wealth management franchise, which we believe is a good move since that business is fee based, requires little capital and has very good secular growth trends. Additionally, Credit Suisse has reduced its exposure to the global markets business, which has enabled it to de-risk its balance sheet and operate with a more efficient cost structure. Read more...
David Herro Comments on Credit Suisse Guru stock highlight
Credit Suisse (NYSE:CS), a Swiss financial services group, was the largest detractor from performance for the fiscal year. Credit Suisse’s share price has been weak over the past year for multiple reasons. The company’s investment banking results have struggled, although we recognize that the underperformance is partially due to restructuring activity and we expect performance to strengthen once restructuring is complete. One-off expenses related to litigation, pension true-up charges and write-downs on certain credit assets also hurt performance. Additionally, the U.K.’s decision to leave the European Union negatively impacted the share price. Credit Suisse’s management has responded to these challenges with a series of restructuring measures. Its management has made progress expanding its wealth management franchise, which we believe is a good move since that business is fee based, requires little capital and has very good secular growth trends. Additionally, Credit Suisse has reduced its exposure to the global markets business, which has enabled it to de-risk its balance sheet and operate with a more efficient cost structure. Read more...
David Herro Comments on Credit Suisse Guru stock highlight
Credit Suisse (NYSE:CS), one of Switzerland’s top financial services groups, was the largest detractor from performance for the quarter, declining 22%. Although the U.K.’s decision to leave the EU has negatively impacted Credit Suisse Group’s share price, it is important to remember that the bank derives only 2% of its revenues from the U.K., while 13% of its costs are denominated in pound sterling currency—the net result of which may be somewhat positive for profitability. While the decision to leave the EU has caused notable market upheaval, global market declines were actually more extreme in the first few months of 2016 due to significant commodity price weakness, concerns regarding slowed economic growth in the U.S. and China, and monetary decisions by major central banks. Even so, Credit Suisse was able to grow net new money by 6.1% in the first quarter, which was meaningfully better than the 3.8% we estimated for the full fiscal year and higher than our expected normal run-rate of 5%. Additionally, we believe its overall first quarter results were good. Performance in its investment bank division lagged behind the industry, Read more...
David Herro and Bill Nygren Comments on Credit Suisse Guru stock highlight
Credit Suisse (NYSE:CS), one of Switzerland’s top financial services groups, was the largest detractor from performance for the quarter, declining 22%. Although the U.K.’s decision to leave the EU has negatively impacted Credit Suisse Group’s share price, it is important to remember that the bank derives only 2% of its revenues from the U.K., while 13% of its costs are denominated in pound sterling currency, the net result of which may be somewhat positive for profitability. While the decision to leave the EU has caused notable market upheaval, global market declines were actually more extreme in the first few months of 2016 due to significant commodity price weakness, concerns regarding slowed economic growth in the U.S. and China, and monetary decisions by major central banks. Even so, Credit Suisse was able to grow net new money by 6.1% in the first quarter, which was meaningfully better than the 3.8% we estimated for the full fiscal year and higher than our expected normal run-rate of 5%. Additionally, we believe its overall first quarter results were good. Performance in its investment bank division lagged behind the industry, Read more...
Deeply Discounted, Solid European Banks David Herro Is Buying Value guru says they're gaining strength, able to withstand storms and wrongly priced
The threat of a British exit from the European Union has contributed to a drastic decline in prices for European financial stocks, and at least one value guru, Oakmark Funds’ David Herro (Trades, Portfolio), believes the sector is highly attractive, according to his interview Thursday on CNBC. Read more...
Brandes Investments Comments on Credit Suisse Guru stock highlight
Credit Suisse (NYSE:CS) declined over 30% during the quarter as the market remained concerned about the company’s restructuring/turnaround and the possible negative effect on financial results over the next year. Nonetheless, we continue to believe Credit Suisse has an economically attractive business model and is significantly discounted at its current valuation of 0.7x tangible book value. Accordingly, we increased our allocation during the quarter. Read more...
Brandes Funds Comments on Credit Suisse Guru stock highlight
Credit Suisse (NYSE:CS) saw its shares fall over 30% in the quarter as the market remained concerned about the company’s restructuring and its negative effect on financial results over the next year. Nonetheless, we continue to believe Credit Suisse has an economically attractive business model and is significantly discounted at its valuation of 0.7x tangible book value as of March 31. Read more...
Bill Nygren, David Herro Comment on Credit Suisse Guru stock highlight
Credit Suisse (NYSE:CS) (Switzerland) was the largest detractor for the quarter, declining by 34%. Although CEO Tidjane Thiam warned that fourth-quarter earnings would be weak, some one-off expenses related to litigation, pension true-up charges and write-downs on certain credit assets were negative surprises during the period. However, this has caused the management team to accelerate the restructuring and reduction of non-core investment banking lines of businesses. The goal is to emphasize the wealth management business that has very good secular growth trends, is fee based and requires little capital. We believe Credit Suisse’s capital position remains solid with a Tier 1 capital ratio of 11.4% as of year-end, which is in excess of regulators’ 10% requirement. Despite some near-term challenges, we continue to believe that over time shareholders will benefit from CEO Thiam’s initiatives to correct some legacy missteps, grow the business and reduce costs. Read more...
Know Credit Suisse's Loan Portfolio Before Investing Credit Suisse had a lousy year in 2015 and has exposure to energy and emerging markets
Credit Suisse Group (CS) has gotten hit with a big earnings loss for 2015 and concerns over its loan portfolio. Like many banks, it is difficult to analyze as you do not know what its loan portfolio looks like. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward P/E 16.81
CS's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
51% of the 334 Companies
in the Global Banks - Global industry.

( Industry Median: 15.24 vs. CS: 16.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) 9.09
CS's Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) is ranked higher than
72% of the 883 Companies
in the Global Banks - Global industry.

( Industry Median: 13.78 vs. CS: 9.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) only.
CS' s Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.58  Med: 7.05 Max: 15.33
Current: 9.09
0.58
15.33
P/B 0.71
CS's P/B is ranked higher than
79% of the 1662 Companies
in the Global Banks - Global industry.

( Industry Median: 1.12 vs. CS: 0.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
CS' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.47  Med: 1.09 Max: 2.28
Current: 0.71
0.47
2.28
P/S 1.58
CS's P/S is ranked higher than
85% of the 1645 Companies
in the Global Banks - Global industry.

( Industry Median: 3.21 vs. CS: 1.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
CS' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.83  Med: 1.64 Max: 4.64
Current: 1.58
0.83
4.64
PFCF 2.75
CS's PFCF is ranked higher than
82% of the 826 Companies
in the Global Banks - Global industry.

( Industry Median: 12.19 vs. CS: 2.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
CS' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.21  Med: 1.66 Max: 22.8
Current: 2.75
0.21
22.8
POCF 2.47
CS's POCF is ranked higher than
83% of the 925 Companies
in the Global Banks - Global industry.

( Industry Median: 10.51 vs. CS: 2.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
CS' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.21  Med: 1.58 Max: 18.58
Current: 2.47
0.21
18.58
Shiller P/E 9.83
CS's Shiller P/E is ranked higher than
89% of the 502 Companies
in the Global Banks - Global industry.

( Industry Median: 20.35 vs. CS: 9.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
CS' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.42  Med: 8.17 Max: 15.34
Current: 9.83
5.42
15.34

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 4.67
CS's Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
92% of the 2376 Companies
in the Global Banks - Global industry.

( Industry Median: 2.79 vs. CS: 4.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
CS' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.17  Med: 3.01 Max: 10.44
Current: 4.67
0.17
10.44
Dividend Growth (3y) -1.50
CS's Dividend Growth (3y) is ranked lower than
78% of the 739 Companies
in the Global Banks - Global industry.

( Industry Median: 8.00 vs. CS: -1.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Growth (3y) only.
CS' s Dividend Growth (3y) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -19.6 Max: 171.3
Current: -1.5
0
171.3
Forward Dividend Yield 4.54
CS's Forward Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
97% of the 2299 Companies
in the Global Banks - Global industry.

( Industry Median: 2.98 vs. CS: 4.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield only.
N/A
Yield on cost (5-Year) 1.31
CS's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked lower than
77% of the 2629 Companies
in the Global Banks - Global industry.

( Industry Median: 3.56 vs. CS: 1.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
CS' s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.05  Med: 0.84 Max: 2.92
Current: 1.31
0.05
2.92
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -12.70
CS's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
80% of the 1061 Companies
in the Global Banks - Global industry.

( Industry Median: -2.00 vs. CS: -12.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
CS' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.7  Med: -1.5 Max: 2.4
Current: -12.7
-12.7
2.4

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 0.85
CS's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
76% of the 1660 Companies
in the Global Banks - Global industry.

( Industry Median: 1.19 vs. CS: 0.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
CS' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.54  Med: 2.08 Max: 6.52
Current: 0.85
0.54
6.52
Price/Projected FCF 0.27
CS's Price/Projected FCF is ranked higher than
92% of the 872 Companies
in the Global Banks - Global industry.

( Industry Median: 0.74 vs. CS: 0.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
CS' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.14  Med: 0.28 Max: 2.37
Current: 0.27
0.14
2.37
Price/Median PS Value 1.00
CS's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
79% of the 1450 Companies
in the Global Banks - Global industry.

( Industry Median: 1.10 vs. CS: 1.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
CS' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.25  Med: 0.96 Max: 2.94
Current: 1
0.25
2.94
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) -4.91
CS's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
81% of the 1663 Companies
in the Global Banks - Global industry.

( Industry Median: 5.80 vs. CS: -4.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
CS' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.03  Med: 3.6 Max: 6
Current: -4.91
-5.03
6
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 28.17
CS's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
80% of the 886 Companies
in the Global Banks - Global industry.

( Industry Median: 11.59 vs. CS: 28.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
CS' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -75  Med: -7 Max: 114.1
Current: 28.17
-75
114.1

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $19,771
EPS (TTM) $ -3.35
Beta1.36
Short Percentage of Float0.29%
52-Week Range $10.01 - 22.22
Shares Outstanding (Mil)2,088.30

Analyst Estimate

Dec16 Dec17 Dec18
Revenue (Mil $) 20,488 21,268 20,446
EPS ($) 0.59 0.90 1.34
EPS w/o NRI ($) 0.59 0.90 1.34
EPS Growth Rate
(3Y to 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends Per Share ($) 0.24 0.24 0.24
» More Articles for NYSE:CS

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
6 Stocks With Low P/S Ratios Oct 20 2016 
David Herro's Oakmark Global Fund 3rd Quarter Commentary Oct 28 2016 
Bill Nygren and David Herro Comment on Credit Suisse Oct 10 2016 
David Herro Comments on Credit Suisse Oct 10 2016 
Bill Nygren and David Herro's Oakmark Global Select Fund 3rd Quarter Commentary Oct 10 2016 
David Herro's Oakmark International Fund 3rd Quarter 2016 Oct 10 2016 
Pepsi: A Good Recession Pick? Sep 18 2016 
Brandes Global Equity Fund 2nd Quarter Commentary Aug 24 2016 
David Herro and Bill Nygren Comments on Credit Suisse Jul 12 2016 
David Herro Comments on Credit Suisse Jul 12 2016 

More From Other Websites
Credit Suisse AG Announces That It Is Reducing The Minimum Redemption Amount Of Its DWTI And UWTI... Dec 09 2016
Citi Revives Popular Leveraged Oil ETNs That Credit Suisse Killed Dec 09 2016
Moody's Investors Service affirms rating of Senior Note Issuance Facility issued by Startline Auto... Dec 09 2016
Just In Time: New Leveraged ETNs For Oil Traders Dec 09 2016
Credit Suisse Lowers 2017 Gold Forecast Dec 08 2016
There have been more departures from Credit Suisse Dec 08 2016
MOVES-Credit Suisse hires analyst Robert Peck to head internet banking -memo Dec 08 2016
Credit Suisse's Shares Climb Over 5% on Cost Savings Drive Dec 08 2016
Trade Idea: Short CarMax Dec 07 2016
Today Is Last Day Of Listed Trading For ‘UWTI,’ ‘DWTI’ Dec 07 2016
Credit Suisse CEO Thiam Pledges $1B More Cost Cuts Dec 07 2016
Credit Suisse Wants to Be an Exception Dec 07 2016
[$$] Credit Suisse's Ambitions Take Another Knock Dec 07 2016
Credit Suisse's Thiam steps up cost cuts, lowers profit goals Dec 07 2016
Credit Suisse's Thiam steps up cost cuts, lowers profit goals Dec 07 2016
Credit Suisse's Thiam steps up cost cuts, lowers profit goals Dec 07 2016
Credit Suisse Rises on Outlook Caution, Cost Cuts Dec 07 2016
[$$] Credit Suisse lowers profit targets and steps up cost cuts Dec 07 2016
Credit Suisse Adds More Cost Cuts to Turnaround Plan Dec 07 2016
European shares on a fourth quarter high as banks gain further ground Dec 07 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)