Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.65
CSL's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
52% of the 1241 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 0.75 vs. CSL: 0.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
CSL' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.23 Max: 1.31
Current: 0.65
0.01
1.31
Equity-to-Asset 0.62
CSL's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
71% of the 1235 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 0.49 vs. CSL: 0.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
CSL' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.39  Med: 0.52 Max: 0.64
Current: 0.62
0.39
0.64
Interest Coverage 18.09
CSL's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
51% of the 1098 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 18.66 vs. CSL: 18.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
CSL' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.74  Med: 14.39 Max: 30.58
Current: 18.09
6.74
30.58
Piotroski F-Score: 7
Altman Z-Score: 5.20
Beneish M-Score: -2.69
WACC vs ROIC
6.39%
7.96%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 15.70
CSL's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
88% of the 1244 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 5.42 vs. CSL: 15.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
CSL' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6  Med: 11.57 Max: 15.7
Current: 15.7
6
15.7
Net Margin % 6.80
CSL's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
69% of the 1244 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 4.01 vs. CSL: 6.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
CSL' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.79  Med: 7.18 Max: 9.48
Current: 6.8
1.79
9.48
ROE % 10.22
CSL's ROE % is ranked higher than
55% of the 1220 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 8.90 vs. CSL: 10.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
CSL' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.04  Med: 12.45 Max: 20.67
Current: 10.22
5.04
20.67
ROA % 6.23
CSL's ROA % is ranked higher than
66% of the 1259 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 3.99 vs. CSL: 6.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
CSL' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.75  Med: 6.74 Max: 11.07
Current: 6.23
2.75
11.07
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 40.33
CSL's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
87% of the 1254 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 14.15 vs. CSL: 40.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
CSL' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 17.27  Med: 32.04 Max: 48.46
Current: 40.33
17.27
48.46
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 7.60
CSL's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
67% of the 1091 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 3.40 vs. CSL: 7.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
CSL' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -7.7  Med: 6.9 Max: 23.5
Current: 7.6
-7.7
23.5
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 6.40
CSL's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
54% of the 1005 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 7.60 vs. CSL: 6.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
CSL' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -29.2  Med: 11.3 Max: 64.1
Current: 6.4
-29.2
64.1
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 2.00
CSL's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
57% of the 895 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 7.20 vs. CSL: 2.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
CSL' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -33.4  Med: 11.9 Max: 73.6
Current: 2
-33.4
73.6
GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with Carlisle Companies Inc $CSL.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» CSL's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-05-09 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2016

CSL Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Jim Simons 332,500 sh (+127.58%)
Joel Greenblatt 158,844 sh (+6.54%)
Steven Cohen 5,100 sh (+2.00%)
Tom Russo 2,700 sh (-10.00%)
Chuck Royce 173,500 sh (-15.67%)
Paul Tudor Jones 13,741 sh (-30.58%)
» More
Q2 2016

CSL Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Columbia Wanger 450,924 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 262,537 sh (+65.28%)
Jim Simons 370,700 sh (+11.49%)
Tom Russo 2,700 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones 10,004 sh (-27.20%)
Chuck Royce 81,400 sh (-53.08%)
» More
Q3 2016

CSL Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Caxton Associates 50,000 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 16,033 sh (+60.27%)
Tom Russo 2,500 sh (-7.41%)
Jim Simons 310,400 sh (-16.27%)
Columbia Wanger 357,050 sh (-20.82%)
Joel Greenblatt 34,230 sh (-86.96%)
Chuck Royce 6,800 sh (-91.65%)
» More
Q4 2016

CSL Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Jeremy Grantham 25,700 sh (New)
Pioneer Investments 46,257 sh (New)
Chuck Royce 31,675 sh (+365.81%)
Joel Greenblatt 63,077 sh (+84.27%)
Columbia Wanger 480,269 sh (+34.51%)
Jim Simons 331,200 sh (+6.70%)
Tom Russo Sold Out
Caxton Associates Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones 11,808 sh (-26.35%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CSL

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Autos » Rubber & Plastics    NAICS: 326299    SIC: 3069
Compare:OTCPK:NKRKY, NAS:GT, NYSE:TSE, NYSE:CTB, OTCPK:TGLVY, NYSE:WMS, OTCPK:SLJUY, NYSE:TG, NAS:AEPI, OTCPK:SEIGF, NYSE:MYE, NAS:CXDC, OTCPK:ABSSF, AMEX:CMT, OTCPK:PLTYF, NAS:DSWL, NAS:CTIB, OTCPK:VYST, OTCPK:GLGI, OTCPK:STCC » details
Traded in other countries:CLE.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Carlisle Companies Inc manufactures construction materials. The Company's products include insulation materials, rubber, thermoplastic polyolefin, and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) roofing membranes used predominantly on non-residential low-sloped roofs.

Carlisle Companies is a holding company, which through its subsidiaries, manufactures and sells a variety of rubber and plastic products. The company organizes itself into five segments based on product type. The construction materials segment, which generates the majority of revenue, sells roofing systems and insulation. The interconnect technologies segment sells wires, cables, and connectors used to transfer power and data. The fluid technologies segment sells liquid finishing products used for vehicles and building construction. The brake and friction segment sells braking systems for aircraft and other industrial applications. The food service products segment sells commercial food service and janitorial products. The majority of revenue comes from the United States.

Top Ranked Articles about Carlisle Companies Inc

Comstock Announces Proposed Acquisition of Select Sands' Gold Assets
VANCOUVER, BC--(Marketwired - May 16, 2016) -
Comstock Metals Ltd.
(TSX VENTURE: CSL) ("Comstock") and Select Sands Corp. (TSX VENTURE: SNS) ("Select Sands") are pleased to announce that they have entered into a letter of intent in respect of a proposed purchase by Comstock of Select Sands' Preview SW gold project located in the La Ronge district of Saskatchewan and Select Sands' early-stage Old Cabin property in Ontario (together the "Assets"). Under the terms of the letter of intent Comstock would acquire the Assets for 20 million post-consolidation common shares in the capital of Comstock and the assumption of certain liabilities associated with the Assets. "We believe that this acquisition will be accretive to Comstock and will diversify its asset base within mining-friendly Canadian jurisdictions. The Preview SW gold project has excellent potential for resource expansion and further discoveries," commented Comstock President and CEO David Terry. The Preview SW gold project is located 40 km north of La Ronge, Saskatchewan and 80 km southwest of Claude Resources Inc. Seabee gold mine; Claude is currently being acquired by Silver Standard Resources Inc. in a deal valued at > C$400 million. The Preview SW project database contains results from 162 core holes, totaling 26,250 m, drilled between 1985 and 2013. Of these, 136 were drilled on the main Preview SW deposit and form the basis for a NI 43-101 Compliant Resource Estimate1 (see October 1, 2013 Select Sands News Release) that included:

Indicated resources containing 158,300 ounces of gold
(2.61 million tonnes grading 1.89 g/t Au) based on a 0.50 g/t Au cut-off grade.
Inferred resources containing 270,800 ounces of gold
(5.70 million tonnes grading 1.48 g/t Au) based on a 0.50 g/t Au cut-off grade. The main Preview SW deposit is comprised of several sub-parallel northeast-trending gold-bearing quartz-sulphide mineralized structural zones, 500 m in strike length and totalling 150 m in width. Preliminary metallurgical test work indicates total gold recovery in concentrates ranged from 90% to 93% (see Select Sands June 3, 2013 News Release). In addition, there are 6 additional known gold zones on the 853 ha property with only limited drilling. At the Preview North zone, located 2.6 km northeast of the Preview SW deposit, drill hole PR13-163 (see Select Sands April 8, 2013 News Release) intersected:

17.98 g/t Au over 5.71 m starting at 10 m below surface
5.96 g/t Au over 5.66 m
starting at 19 m below surface and,
1.88 g/t Au over 21.26 m
starting at 29 m below surface No drilling has been carried out for over 600 m to the south of this hole. For more details about the project please visit: http://www.selectsandscorp.com/projects/sk-gold-project/The 1,118 ha Old Cabin project is located 80 km northeast of Wawa, Ontario and 10 km east of Richmont Mines' Island Gold Mine, which is forecast to produce 62-67,000 oz of gold in 20162. The property has had surface sampling and geological mapping carried out, resulting in the discovery of thirteen discrete gold zones, all associated with shear zones and strong iron carbonate alteration. Highlights of results reported by Select Sands include a channel sample of 40.5 g/t Au over 1.68 m. The completion of the transaction is subject to a number of conditions including completion of due diligence, negotiation and execution of definitive documentation, receipt of all necessary regulatory approvals (including the approval of the TSX Venture Exchange), receipt of required shareholder approvals and the receipt of fairness opinions which are acceptable to the board of directors of each of Comstock and Select Sands. The letter of intent provides for a 75 day exclusivity period, subject to Select Sand's right to consider and accept unsolicited superior proposals. In the event of a superior proposal, Comstock will have a five business day right to match the superior proposal.Given that Comstock and Select Sands have certain directors that serve as directors of both Comstock and Select Sands, each board has appointed independent committees to review the proposed transaction.As noted above this transaction remains subject to a number of conditions and there can be no assurances that the proposed transaction will be completed as proposed or at all.Further Details regarding the Preview SW gold project can be found in Select Sands' press release dated March 17, 2016. 1
This resource estimate was conducted by GeoSim Services Inc. Ronald G. Simpson, P. Geo., of GeoSim, is the Qualified Person as defined under National Instrument 43-101 responsible for the resource estimates. Mineral resources have been classified using the definitions set out in CIM (2010). Mineral resources have an effective date of August 31, 2013. A copy of the report is available on Select Sands website at http://www.selectsandscorp.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/LaRonge43-101.pdf 2
see www.richmont-mines.com
About Comstock Metals Ltd.

Comstock Metals Ltd. is a mineral exploration company. Its flagship 16,335 hectare QV Property is located in the White Gold district of the Yukon Territory, approximately 70 kilometres south of Dawson City and 44 kilometres northeast of the Coffee project of Kaminak Gold Corporation, which is being acquired by Goldcorp Inc. in a deal valued at C$520 million. To date, the Company has completed 3,400 metres of drilling in 17 drill holes which formed the basis for a maiden Inferred mineral resource totalling 4.4 million tonnes grading 1.65 g/t Au containing 230,000 ounces of gold at a 0.5 g/t Au cut-off (See Comstock July 8, 2014 News Release). The VG Deposit remains open in all directions and is proximal to other untested sub-parallel structures. The VG Zone has similar geology and style of mineralization to Kinross's Golden Saddle deposit, located 11 kilometres to the south. Additional promising targets exist on the QV Project, with potential for the discovery of significant intrusion related and/or orogenic gold mineralization. The infrastructure associated with the development of the Coffee project, including upgrading and completion of the mine access road, will benefit all projects in the district, including the QV Property. Comstock also owns early stage uranium claims in the Patterson Lake area of Saskatchewan and has recently optioned out its Corona property in Mexico (see Comstock January 28, 2016 News Release). David A. Terry, Ph.D., P.Geo., a Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101, has reviewed and approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this news release related to the Comstock scientific and technical disclosure. About Select Sands Corp.
Select Sands' Sandtown property, located in northeast Arkansas, USA, is underlain by the Ordovician St. Peter sandstone formation, which is a major source of 'Ottawa White' Tier-1 frac sand/industrial sand selling into major US oil and gas basins as well as industrial and speciality end markets. The Sandtown property is located 3.1 miles from Highway 167 near a natural gas pipeline. The property has an active power line on the property and is located approximately 14.7 miles from the nearest rail system (see Select Sands December 4, 2014 News Release). Compared to competitive sand mines located in Wisconsin owned by the largest US frac sand producers, Sandtown has a competitive location advantage as it is approximately 650 rail miles closer to the Texas/Louisiana oil/gas plays as well as the Houston port and industrial hub.As per the June 2015 Preliminary Economic Assessment report by Tetra Tech of Golden, Colorado, USA and Vancouver, BC, Canada, the Sandtown property has a pre-tax NPV valued at US $160 million and a post-tax NPV valued at US $92 million. The PEA was completed on a portion of the current silica sand mineral resources (see the Company's June 10, 2015 news release). The Company would like to remind investors that mineral resources for the Sandtown Property are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability and there is no certainty that this PEA will be realized. Subsequent to the completion of the 2015 PEA, Select Sands announced an updated mineral resource estimate for the Sandtown property totaling 41.98 Million Tons of Indicated Silica Sand Resources (see the Select Sands February 10, 2016 news release).The Company also owns Preview SW Gold Project in the La Ronge Gold Belt, northern Saskatchewan. Douglas Turnbull, P.Geo., a Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101, has reviewed and approved the scientific and technical disclosure specifically related to the Select Sand's properties in this news release.
Forward Looking Statements

This news release includes forward-looking information and statements, which may include, but are not limited to, information and statements regarding or inferring the future business, operations, financial performance, prospects, and other plans, intentions, expectations, estimates, and beliefs of the Company. Such statements include statements regarding the ability to satisfy the conditions necessary to complete the proposed transaction. Information and statements which are not purely historical fact are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking information and statements involve and are subject to assumptions and known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause actual events, results, performance, or achievements of the Company to be materially different from future events, results, performance, and achievements expressed or implied by forward-looking information and statements herein. The assumptions on which the forward looking statements contained herein rely include the ability to complete the financing. Although the Company believes that any forward-looking information and statements herein are reasonable, in light of the use of assumptions and the significant risks and uncertainties inherent in such information and statements, there can be no assurance that any such forward-looking information and statements will prove to be accurate, and accordingly readers are advised to rely on their own evaluation of such risks and uncertainties and should not place undue reliance upon such forward-looking information and statements. Any forward-looking information and statements herein are made as of the date hereof, and except as required by applicable laws, the Company assumes no obligation and disclaims any intention to update or revise any forward-looking information and statements herein or to update the reasons that actual events or results could or do differ from those projected in any forward looking information and statements herein, whether as a result of new information, future events or results, or otherwise, except as required by applicable laws.
Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this Release.


For more information about Comstock Metals Ltd., please visit www.comstock-metals.com or contact:

David A Terry, Ph.D., P.Geo.
President, CEO and Director
COMSTOCK METALS LTD.
Phone: (604) 639-4533
Email: [email protected]

For more information about Select Sands Corp., please visit www.selectsandscorp.com or contact:

Rasool Mohammad, B.Sc. (Mining)
President & CEO.
Phone: (604) 639-4533
Investor Relations

Arlen Hansen
[email protected]
Phone: (604) 684-6730



Read more...
Weekly CFO Sells Highlights Recent insider sales were Carlisle Companies, Verisk Analytics and Northrop Grumman
According to GuruFocus Insider Data, the recent CFO sells were: Carlisle Companies Inc. (NYSE:CSL), Verisk Analytics Inc. (NASDAQ:VRSK) and Northrop Grumman Corp. (NYSE:NOC). Read more...
Comstock Announces Dr. David A. Terry as President and CEO
VANCOUVER, BC--(Marketwired - April 25, 2016) -
Comstock Metals Ltd.
(TSX VENTURE: CSL) ("CSL" or the "Company") is pleased to announce that Dr. David A. Terry has joined the Company as President and CEO and Director, effective today. Dr. Terry is a professional economic geologist, senior executive and corporate director with more than 25 years' of international experience in the mineral resources sector. He has played key roles in the successful acquisition, exploration and development of a number of precious and base metal deposits, primarily in North and South America, and has expertise in advanced project evaluation, M&A, corporate finance, and design and execution of effective exploration programs. In the course of his career Dr. Terry has held executive positions and directorships with a number of publicly-listed and private mineral resource companies; he currently serves as a director of Golden Arrow Resources Corporation which is advancing its Chinchillas silver project in Argentina. He has also worked with a number of senior mining companies including Boliden Limited, Westmin Resources Limited, Hemlo Gold Mines Inc., Cominco Limited and Gold Fields Mining Corporation.Dr. Terry holds a B.Sc. and Ph.D. in geology from Western University in Ontario and is a member of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia.Douglas Turnbull, P.Geo., a Qualified Professional as defined by National Instrument 43-101 has reviewed and approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this press release.
About Comstock Metals Ltd.

Comstock Metals Ltd. is a mineral exploration company. Its flagship 16,335 hectare QV Property is located in the White Gold district of the Yukon Territory, approximately 70 kilometres south of Dawson City. To date, the Company has completed 3,400 metres of drilling in 17 drill holes which formed the basis for a maiden Inferred mineral resource totalling 4.4 million tonnes grading 1.65 g/t Au containing 230,000 ounces of gold at a 0.5 g/t Au cut-off (See July 8, 2014 News Release). The VG Deposit remains open in all directions and is proximal to other untested sub-parallel structures. The VG Zone has similar geology and style of mineralization to Kinross's Golden Saddle deposit, located 11 kilometres to the south. Additional promising targets exist on the QV Project, with potential for the discovery of significant intrusion related and/or orogenic gold mineralization. Comstock also owns early stage uranium claims in the Patterson Lake area of Saskatchewan.
Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this Release.


For more information about Comstock Metals Ltd., please go to www.comstock-metals.com or contact:

Rasool Mohammad
Interim President & CEO, Director

COMSTOCK METALS LTD. 
Phone: (604) 639-4533
Email: [email protected]



Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 28.18
CSL's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
71% of the 1026 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 17.93 vs. CSL: 28.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
CSL' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.8  Med: 16.93 Max: 29.89
Current: 28.18
8.8
29.89
Forward PE Ratio 18.28
CSL's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
90% of the 293 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 9.79 vs. CSL: 18.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 28.11
CSL's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
70% of the 1023 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 17.86 vs. CSL: 28.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
CSL' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.8  Med: 18.11 Max: 57.55
Current: 28.11
8.8
57.55
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 23.13
CSL's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked lower than
63% of the 566 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 17.08 vs. CSL: 23.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
CSL' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.99  Med: 20.25 Max: 75.1
Current: 23.13
3.99
75.1
PB Ratio 2.81
CSL's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
70% of the 1212 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.71 vs. CSL: 2.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
CSL' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.97  Med: 2.25 Max: 3.13
Current: 2.81
0.97
3.13
PS Ratio 1.90
CSL's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
75% of the 1220 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 0.83 vs. CSL: 1.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
CSL' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.35  Med: 1.17 Max: 2.08
Current: 1.9
0.35
2.08
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 16.45
CSL's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
54% of the 482 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 15.13 vs. CSL: 16.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
CSL' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.41  Med: 16.31 Max: 90.58
Current: 16.45
3.41
90.58
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 13.09
CSL's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
69% of the 647 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 8.70 vs. CSL: 13.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
CSL' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.05  Med: 12.32 Max: 146.19
Current: 13.09
3.05
146.19
EV-to-EBIT 15.98
CSL's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
63% of the 1383 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 13.17 vs. CSL: 15.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
CSL' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.3  Med: 12.6 Max: 27.1
Current: 15.98
6.3
27.1
EV-to-EBITDA 12.19
CSL's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
65% of the 1412 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 9.05 vs. CSL: 12.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
CSL' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.2  Med: 9.8 Max: 13.3
Current: 12.19
5.2
13.3
PEG Ratio 3.09
CSL's PEG Ratio is ranked lower than
70% of the 579 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.63 vs. CSL: 3.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
CSL' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.47  Med: 1.4 Max: 15.35
Current: 3.09
0.47
15.35
Shiller PE Ratio 31.64
CSL's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked lower than
54% of the 207 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 28.83 vs. CSL: 31.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
CSL' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.68  Med: 24.32 Max: 34.21
Current: 31.64
9.68
34.21
Current Ratio 2.64
CSL's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
79% of the 1111 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.56 vs. CSL: 2.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
CSL' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.44  Med: 2.24 Max: 4.11
Current: 2.64
1.44
4.11
Quick Ratio 1.90
CSL's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
76% of the 1111 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.13 vs. CSL: 1.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
CSL' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.73  Med: 1.4 Max: 3.28
Current: 1.9
0.73
3.28
Days Inventory 54.67
CSL's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
52% of the 1204 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 57.00 vs. CSL: 54.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
CSL' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 48.82  Med: 67.38 Max: 92.72
Current: 54.67
48.82
92.72
Days Sales Outstanding 50.81
CSL's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
62% of the 999 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 61.70 vs. CSL: 50.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
CSL' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 38.87  Med: 50.42 Max: 71.23
Current: 50.81
38.87
71.23
Days Payable 35.31
CSL's Days Payable is ranked lower than
72% of the 956 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 55.61 vs. CSL: 35.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
CSL' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 18.66  Med: 30.83 Max: 49.88
Current: 35.31
18.66
49.88

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 1.26
CSL's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
69% of the 1322 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.95 vs. CSL: 1.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
CSL' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.97  Med: 1.29 Max: 3.37
Current: 1.26
0.97
3.37
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.34
CSL's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked lower than
57% of the 861 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 0.29 vs. CSL: 0.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
CSL' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.16  Med: 0.25 Max: 0.34
Current: 0.34
0.16
0.34
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 15.70
CSL's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked higher than
64% of the 661 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 9.70 vs. CSL: 15.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
CSL' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.2  Med: 7.6 Max: 15.7
Current: 15.7
3.2
15.7
Forward Dividend Yield % 1.30
CSL's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
72% of the 1291 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 2.09 vs. CSL: 1.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 2.33
CSL's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
54% of the 1603 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.78 vs. CSL: 2.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
CSL' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.8  Med: 2.39 Max: 6.24
Current: 2.33
1.8
6.24
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -0.40
CSL's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
66% of the 570 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: -2.10 vs. CSL: -0.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
CSL' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.6  Med: -0.1 Max: 1.7
Current: -0.4
-1.6
1.7

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 13.49
CSL's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
96% of the 1164 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.87 vs. CSL: 13.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
CSL' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.27  Med: 4.75 Max: 17.53
Current: 13.49
1.27
17.53
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 1.08
CSL's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
64% of the 604 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.34 vs. CSL: 1.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
CSL' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.64  Med: 1.33 Max: 2.67
Current: 1.08
0.64
2.67
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.62
CSL's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
70% of the 1091 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.25 vs. CSL: 1.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
CSL' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.32  Med: 0.78 Max: 1.66
Current: 1.62
0.32
1.66
Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value 2.92
CSL's Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value is ranked lower than
84% of the 334 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.11 vs. CSL: 2.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value only.
CSL' s Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.47  Med: 1.07 Max: 5.12
Current: 2.92
0.47
5.12
Price-to-Graham-Number 4.10
CSL's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked lower than
90% of the 833 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.21 vs. CSL: 4.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
CSL' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.76  Med: 1.94 Max: 4.21
Current: 4.1
0.76
4.21
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 6.26
CSL's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
55% of the 1578 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 6.83 vs. CSL: 6.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
CSL' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.7  Med: 7.9 Max: 16
Current: 6.26
3.7
16
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 14.41
CSL's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
68% of the 748 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 7.34 vs. CSL: 14.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
CSL' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.6  Med: 16.9 Max: 25.8
Current: 14.41
-1.6
25.8

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $3,675
EPS (TTM) $ 3.81
Beta0.75
Short Percentage of Float3.03%
52-Week Range $98.23 - 116.40
Shares Outstanding (Mil)64.59

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18
Revenue (Mil $) 3,948 4,115
EPS ($) 5.88 6.53
EPS without NRI ($) 5.88 6.53
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
16.00%
Dividends per Share ($) 1.46 1.57
» More Articles for CSL

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Best Dividend-Paying Stocks for Dividend Growth Investors Mar 22 2017 
11 Best Stocks for Value Investors This Week Mar 05 2017 
Comstock Announces Proposed Acquisition of Select Sands' Gold Assets May 16 2016 
Weekly CFO Sells Highlights May 16 2016 
Comstock Announces Dr. David A. Terry as President and CEO Apr 25 2016 
3M Co. (MMM) Dividend Stock Analysis May 05 2015 
Comstock Metals Acquires Claims in Cree-Key Lake and Patterson Lake South Areas of Saskatchewan Nov 26 2014 
New PSA Reminds College Students That Vaccination Is the Best Form of Protection Against Dangerous F Nov 25 2014 
Weekly CFO Sells Highlight: Carlisle Companies Inc, Goldman Sachs Group Inc, Hasbro Inc. Oct 27 2014 
General Electric: A Leader in all Markets Jul 31 2014 

More From Other Websites
Carlisle Cos., Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : CSL-US : April 21, 2017 Apr 21 2017
Carlisle Cos., Inc. : CSL-US: Dividend Analysis : February 17th, 2017 (record date) : By the numbers... Mar 27 2017
Carlisle Companies to Announce 1st Quarter Results on April 27, 2017 Mar 27 2017
Carlisle Cos., Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : CSL-US : March 27, 2017 Mar 27 2017
Carlisle Cos., Inc. :CSL-US: Earnings Analysis: Q4, 2016 By the Numbers : March 17, 2017 Mar 17 2017
Carlisle Cos., Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : CSL-US : March 15, 2017 Mar 15 2017
Post Earnings Coverage as Goodyear Surpassed Earnings Expectations Feb 28 2017
Carlisle Companies Appoints Robert M. Roche Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Effective... Feb 15 2017
ETFs with exposure to Carlisle Cos., Inc. : February 14, 2017 Feb 14 2017
Carlisle Cos., Inc. :CSL-US: Earnings Analysis: 2016 By the Numbers : February 13, 2017 Feb 13 2017
Carlisle Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2016 Results Feb 09 2017
Carlisle Companies Declares Regular Quarterly Dividend Feb 07 2017
Carlisle Cos., Inc. – Value Analysis (NYSE:CSL) : February 1, 2017 Feb 01 2017
Carlisle Companies Acquires Arbo Holdings Limited Jan 31 2017
Carlisle Cos., Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : CSL-US : January 31,... Jan 31 2017
Carlisle’s American Spirit Sets World Record in 2016 Talisker Atlantic Challenge Win! Jan 19 2017
Carlisle Cos., Inc. : CSL-US: Dividend Analysis : November 17th, 2016 (record date) : By the numbers... Jan 12 2017
What’s the Latest News on Carlisle Companies? Jan 12 2017
Blog Coverage Carlisle Acquires San Jamar; Set to Expand CFSP Business Jan 11 2017
Carlisle Companies Acquires San Jamar Jan 09 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)