Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.06
EAT's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
91% of the 295 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 0.62 vs. EAT: 0.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
EAT' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.02  Med: 0.10 Max: 0.64
Current: 0.06
0.02
0.64
Equity to Asset -0.10
EAT's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
97% of the 294 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 0.50 vs. EAT: -0.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
EAT' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.07  Med: 0.46 Max: 0.68
Current: -0.1
-0.07
0.68
Interest Coverage 10.66
EAT's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
68% of the 210 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 34.46 vs. EAT: 10.66 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
EAT' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.11  Med: 8.64 Max: 14.29
Current: 10.66
2.11
14.29
F-Score: 8
Z-Score: 5.72
M-Score: -2.95
WACC vs ROIC
4.34%
25.28%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 10.43
EAT's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
74% of the 293 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 5.40 vs. EAT: 10.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
EAT' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.28  Med: 7.87 Max: 10.37
Current: 10.43
2.28
10.37
Net-margin (%) 6.57
EAT's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
75% of the 294 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 3.28 vs. EAT: 6.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
EAT' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.22  Med: 5.19 Max: 6.55
Current: 6.57
1.22
6.55
ROA (%) 13.48
EAT's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
90% of the 294 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 4.16 vs. EAT: 13.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
EAT' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.29  Med: 9.92 Max: 13.44
Current: 13.48
2.29
13.44
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 30.84
EAT's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
70% of the 293 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 15.84 vs. EAT: 30.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
EAT' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.63  Med: 20.27 Max: 30
Current: 30.84
6.63
30
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 10.10
EAT's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
71% of the 224 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 4.40 vs. EAT: 10.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
EAT' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9.5  Med: 12.90 Max: 23.1
Current: 10.1
-9.5
23.1
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 16.80
EAT's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
76% of the 197 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 4.90 vs. EAT: 16.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
EAT' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -14.1  Med: 14.90 Max: 27.5
Current: 16.8
-14.1
27.5
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 17.70
EAT's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
72% of the 160 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 6.10 vs. EAT: 17.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
EAT' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -24.6  Med: 17.70 Max: 45.8
Current: 17.7
-24.6
45.8
» EAT's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2015

EAT Guru Trades in Q1 2015

Joel Greenblatt 4,172 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 7,600 sh (New)
Jim Simons 899,000 sh (-37.24%)
David Dreman 143,563 sh (-42.13%)
Ray Dalio 7,924 sh (-67.42%)
Steven Cohen 92,200 sh (-78.02%)
» More
Q2 2015

EAT Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Caxton Associates 25,000 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 136,979 sh (+3183.29%)
Paul Tudor Jones 18,456 sh (+142.84%)
David Dreman 144,784 sh (+0.85%)
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Jim Simons 260,600 sh (-71.01%)
Steven Cohen 2,700 sh (-97.07%)
» More
Q3 2015

EAT Guru Trades in Q3 2015

John Hussman 2,200 sh (New)
Ray Dalio 8,324 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 668,310 sh (+387.89%)
Paul Tudor Jones 79,300 sh (+329.67%)
Jim Simons 423,662 sh (+62.57%)
David Dreman 149,835 sh (+3.49%)
Caxton Associates Sold Out
Steven Cohen Sold Out
» More
Q4 2015

EAT Guru Trades in Q4 2015

John Hussman 2,200 sh (unchged)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with EAT

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 14.98
EAT's P/E(ttm) is ranked higher than
85% of the 312 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 26.02 vs. EAT: 14.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
EAT' s P/E(ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.75  Med: 17.73 Max: 58.7
Current: 14.98
7.75
58.7
Forward P/E 12.32
EAT's Forward P/E is ranked higher than
81% of the 222 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 17.27 vs. EAT: 12.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
PE(NRI) 14.98
EAT's PE(NRI) is ranked higher than
84% of the 254 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 25.41 vs. EAT: 14.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
EAT' s PE(NRI) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.94  Med: 18.20 Max: 64.43
Current: 14.98
7.94
64.43
P/S 0.93
EAT's P/S is ranked lower than
53% of the 337 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 0.85 vs. EAT: 0.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
EAT' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.1  Med: 0.87 Max: 1.4
Current: 0.93
0.1
1.4
PFCF 13.52
EAT's PFCF is ranked higher than
80% of the 249 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 27.99 vs. EAT: 13.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
EAT' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.53  Med: 17.26 Max: 81.2
Current: 13.52
4.53
81.2
POCF 8.66
EAT's POCF is ranked higher than
71% of the 339 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 12.50 vs. EAT: 8.66 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
EAT' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.29  Med: 7.74 Max: 12.67
Current: 8.66
1.29
12.67
EV-to-EBIT 12.10
EAT's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
81% of the 338 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 17.92 vs. EAT: 12.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
EAT' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -42.3  Med: 13.60 Max: 42.9
Current: 12.1
-42.3
42.9
EV-to-EBITDA 8.18
EAT's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
81% of the 338 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 11.92 vs. EAT: 8.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
EAT' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.1  Med: 8.50 Max: 17.5
Current: 8.18
4.1
17.5
PEG 0.84
EAT's PEG is ranked higher than
91% of the 103 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 2.34 vs. EAT: 0.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only.
EAT' s PEG Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.56  Med: 1.39 Max: 35.84
Current: 0.84
0.56
35.84
Shiller P/E 25.21
EAT's Shiller P/E is ranked higher than
60% of the 102 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 29.19 vs. EAT: 25.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
EAT' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.19  Med: 22.28 Max: 36.43
Current: 25.21
3.19
36.43
Current Ratio 0.49
EAT's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
89% of the 292 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 1.09 vs. EAT: 0.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
EAT' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.4  Med: 0.55 Max: 1.28
Current: 0.49
0.4
1.28
Quick Ratio 0.42
EAT's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
87% of the 292 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 0.97 vs. EAT: 0.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
EAT' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.36  Med: 0.47 Max: 1.23
Current: 0.42
0.36
1.23
Days Inventory 4.91
EAT's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
92% of the 273 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 12.07 vs. EAT: 4.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
EAT' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.54  Med: 4.45 Max: 10.34
Current: 4.91
3.54
10.34
Days Sales Outstanding 10.33
EAT's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
70% of the 240 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 8.66 vs. EAT: 10.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
EAT' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.16  Med: 5.63 Max: 6
Current: 10.33
4.16
6
Days Payable 12.14
EAT's Days Payable is ranked lower than
91% of the 232 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 38.20 vs. EAT: 12.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
EAT' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 13.99  Med: 16.02 Max: 51.26
Current: 12.14
13.99
51.26

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 2.56
EAT's Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
63% of the 312 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 1.65 vs. EAT: 2.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
EAT' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.24  Med: 2.17 Max: 11.03
Current: 2.56
0.24
11.03
Dividend Payout 0.36
EAT's Dividend Payout is ranked higher than
58% of the 200 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 0.62 vs. EAT: 0.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout only.
EAT' s Dividend Payout Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.12  Med: 0.31 Max: 0.73
Current: 0.36
0.12
0.73
Dividend Growth (3y) 11.90
EAT's Dividend Growth (3y) is ranked higher than
50% of the 90 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 11.90 vs. EAT: 11.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Growth (3y) only.
EAT' s Dividend Growth (3y) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.00 Max: 30.1
Current: 11.9
0
30.1
Forward Dividend Yield 2.64
EAT's Forward Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
61% of the 274 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 1.84 vs. EAT: 2.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield only.
N/A
Yield on cost (5-Year) 6.01
EAT's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
87% of the 319 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 1.94 vs. EAT: 6.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
EAT' s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.56  Med: 5.09 Max: 25.88
Current: 6.01
0.56
25.88
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 7.20
EAT's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
98% of the 175 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: -0.90 vs. EAT: 7.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
EAT' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.9  Med: 6.00 Max: 10.4
Current: 7.2
-1.9
10.4

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Projected FCF 1.01
EAT's Price/Projected FCF is ranked higher than
79% of the 254 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 1.94 vs. EAT: 1.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
EAT' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.58  Med: 1.60 Max: 13.37
Current: 1.01
0.58
13.37
Price/Median PS Value 1.11
EAT's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
55% of the 339 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 1.07 vs. EAT: 1.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
EAT' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.3  Med: 1.07 Max: 1.55
Current: 1.11
0.3
1.55
Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value 0.90
EAT's Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value is ranked higher than
89% of the 95 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. EAT: 0.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value only.
EAT' s Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.7  Med: 1.25 Max: 6.26
Current: 0.9
0.7
6.26
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 8.24
EAT's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
78% of the 280 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 4.90 vs. EAT: 8.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
EAT' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.3  Med: 7.30 Max: 15.4
Current: 8.24
2.3
15.4
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 21.91
EAT's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
84% of the 156 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 5.98 vs. EAT: 21.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
EAT' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.7  Med: 11.80 Max: 31.5
Current: 21.91
-4.7
31.5

More Statistics

Revenue(Mil) $3100
EPS $ 3.12
Beta0.42
Short Percentage of Float11.40%
52-Week Range $43.20 - 63.40
Shares Outstanding(Mil)57.11

Analyst Estimate

Jun16 Jun17
Revenue(Mil)
EPS($) 3.58 3.94
EPS without NRI($) 3.58 3.94

Latest Earnings Webcast

» More Conference Calls

Business Description

Industry: Restaurants » Restaurants
Compare:BH, MCD, DIN, FRA:SRB, IRG » details
Traded in other countries:BKJ.Germany,
Brinker International Inc was organized under the laws of the State of Delaware in September 1983. The Company owns, develops, operates and franchises the Chilis Grill & Bar (Chilis) and Maggianos Little Italy (Maggianos) restaurant brands. Chili's belongs to the Bar & Grill category of casual dining. Chilis also enjoy a presence with locations in approximately 30 foreign countries and two U.S. territories around the world. Chili's offers a full selection of alcoholic beverages including flavor-infused margaritas and craft beer. Chili's To Go menu is available to order online, through the brand's mobile app or by calling the restaurant. Its all-day menu offers guests a generous selection of appetizers, entrees and desserts at affordable prices. Maggiano's is a full-service, national, casual dining Italian restaurant brand. Each Maggiano's restaurant is a Italian-American restaurant in the style of New York's Little Italy in the 1940s. The Companys Maggiano's restaurants feature individual and family-style menus, and restaurants have banquet facilities designed to host party business or social events. Its Maggiano's restaurants also offer a full range of alcoholic beverages, including a selection of quality premium wines and it offers a full carryout menu as well as local delivery services. It competes with locally owned restaurants as well as national and regional restaurant chains. It has registered and/or have pending, among other marks, Brinker International, Chili's, Chili's Bar & Bites, Chili's Express, Chili's Margarita Bar, Chili's Southwest Grill & Bar, Chili's Too, Maggiano's, and Maggiano's Little Italy, as trademarks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The Company is subject to the Fair Labor Standards Act (which governs such matters as minimum wages, overtime and other working conditions), along with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, various family leave mandates and a variety of other laws enacted, or rules and regulations promulgated by federal, state and local governmental authorities that govern these and other employment matters, including, tip credits, working conditions, safety standards and immigration status and also subject to federal and state environmental regulations.
» More Articles for NYSE:EAT

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
10 Stocks Poised to Become Dividend Champions or Aristocrats Jan 11 2016 
Chuy’s Restaurants Expected to Grow Over Long Term Oct 01 2015 
Brinker International Looks Tastier Aug 28 2015 
Buffalo Wild Wings Still a Great Value Jun 17 2015 
Darden Restaurants Posts A Quarter Report Worth Mentioning Mar 24 2015 
Darden Restaurant Earnings Report – Tread With Caution Mar 23 2015 
Stock Screen: Best and Worst Performing Industries- Food Chains Dec 01 2014 
This Restaurant Chain Can Deliver Good Gains in the Long Run Nov 18 2014 
Yum!'s Growth Opportunity Nov 07 2014 
Darden Restaurant Inc. (DRI) Dividend Stock Analysis Jun 27 2014 

More From Other Websites
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC Financials Feb 05 2016
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC Files SEC form 8-K, Regulation FD Disclosure Feb 02 2016
Brinker International Board Declares Common Dividend Feb 02 2016
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC Files SEC form 10-Q, Quarterly Report Feb 01 2016
Restaurant Industry Stock Outlook - Jan. 2016 Jan 30 2016
Restaurants Stocks Technical Study -- Restaurant Brands Intl., Bloomin' Brands, Brinker Intl., and... Jan 29 2016
Which Factors Affect the Valuation Multiple of Brinker International? Jan 27 2016
RB 11/2016 Publishing dates of the financial reports in 2016 Jan 26 2016
Brinker International, Inc. Earnings Analysis: Q2, 2016 By the Numbers Jan 26 2016
Pepper Dining Acquisition Improved Brinker International’s Revenue Jan 25 2016
Did Brinker International’s 2Q16 Earnings Meet Expectations? Jan 25 2016
Starbucks to open in Slovakia Jan 25 2016
RB 10/2016 Preliminary sales results Q4 2015 Jan 22 2016
RB 9/2016 Agreements between AmRest and Starbucks concerning the development in the Slovak Republic Jan 22 2016
RB 8/2016 Termination of significant agreement with LDS Disztibútor Szolgáltató Kft Jan 22 2016
Despite hardships, Eatzi's celebrates 20 years in business Jan 22 2016
Brinker Beats Q2 Earnings; Comps Fall on Regional Volatility Jan 21 2016
Chili's Parent Brinker Hit By Labor, Food Costs In Q2 Jan 20 2016
Oil price slump is hurting more than just energy companies Jan 20 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK