Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt No Debt
FUL's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
79% of the 1073 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 0.79 vs. FUL: No Debt )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
FUL' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.17 Max: 1.43
Current: No Debt
0.01
1.43
Equity to Asset 0.79
FUL's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
64% of the 1038 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 0.53 vs. FUL: 0.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
FUL' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.33  Med: 0.48 Max: 0.61
Current: 0.79
0.33
0.61
Interest Coverage 7.38
FUL's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
65% of the 750 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 14.93 vs. FUL: 7.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
FUL' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.98  Med: 7.66 Max: 13.75
Current: 7.38
4.98
13.75
F-Score: 7
Z-Score: 3.41
M-Score: -2.77
WACC vs ROIC
11.76%
9.14%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 9.09
FUL's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
63% of the 1054 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 6.31 vs. FUL: 9.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
FUL' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.67  Med: 7.75 Max: 10.2
Current: 9.09
4.67
10.2
Net-margin (%) 5.00
FUL's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
51% of the 1058 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 4.54 vs. FUL: 5.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
FUL' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.36  Med: 5.48 Max: 9.12
Current: 5
1.36
9.12
ROE (%) 12.54
FUL's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
62% of the 1037 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 8.01 vs. FUL: 12.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
FUL' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.83  Med: 12.28 Max: 19.67
Current: 12.54
2.83
19.67
ROA (%) 5.79
FUL's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
56% of the 1078 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 3.87 vs. FUL: 5.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
FUL' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.54  Med: 6.74 Max: 10.38
Current: 5.79
1.54
10.38
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 21.83
FUL's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
66% of the 1068 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 12.39 vs. FUL: 21.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
FUL' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.78  Med: 21.57 Max: 37.48
Current: 21.83
5.78
37.48
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 2.90
FUL's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
54% of the 940 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.10 vs. FUL: 2.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
FUL' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.5  Med: 2.70 Max: 14
Current: 2.9
-3.5
14
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 12.10
FUL's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
66% of the 829 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 5.70 vs. FUL: 12.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
FUL' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -18.9  Med: 6.20 Max: 34.6
Current: 12.1
-18.9
34.6
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 8.50
FUL's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
50% of the 729 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 8.50 vs. FUL: 8.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
FUL' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -30.1  Med: 6.80 Max: 70.7
Current: 8.5
-30.1
70.7
» FUL's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Oprt. Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2015

FUL Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Mario Gabelli 454,890 sh (+4.37%)
Mariko Gordon 1,972,332 sh (+1.68%)
Mairs and Power 3,405,955 sh (+0.20%)
» More
Q3 2015

FUL Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Chuck Royce 92,000 sh (New)
Mario Gabelli 455,065 sh (+0.04%)
Mairs and Power 3,393,307 sh (-0.37%)
Mariko Gordon 1,578,520 sh (-19.97%)
» More
Q4 2015

FUL Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 66,299 sh (New)
Jim Simons 158,600 sh (New)
Chuck Royce 177,500 sh (+92.93%)
Mairs and Power 3,436,542 sh (+1.27%)
Mario Gabelli 454,565 sh (-0.11%)
Mariko Gordon 1,567,693 sh (-0.69%)
» More
Q1 2016

FUL Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Joel Greenblatt 112,622 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 4,997 sh (New)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 118,029 sh (+78.03%)
Jim Simons 246,100 sh (+55.17%)
Mario Gabelli 668,265 sh (+47.01%)
Chuck Royce 192,000 sh (+8.17%)
Mairs and Power 3,508,213 sh (+2.09%)
Mariko Gordon 1,470,387 sh (-6.21%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with FUL

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Chemicals » Specialty Chemicals
Compare:OTCPK:DICCF, NYSE:PAH, NYSE:GCP, NYSE:CBT, NYSE:CHMT, OTCPK:FRUTF, OTCPK:AWTRF, OTCPK:VTXPF, OTCPK:TYOBY, NAS:WDFC, NYSE:CC, NYSE:POL, NYSE:SXT, OTCPK:OCINY, OTCPK:TINLY, OTCPK:EMNSF, NYSE:SCL, NYSE:FOE, OTCPK:OCLDY, NYSE:KWR » details
Traded in other countries:HB1.Germany,
H.B. Fuller Company is a formulator, manufacturer and marketer of adhesives, sealants, paints and other specialty chemical products. Its products include H.B. Fuller, Swift, Advantra, Clarity, Sesame, TEC, Foster, Rakoll and Rapidex.

H.B. Fuller Company was incorporated in Minnesota in 1915. The Company is a formulator, manufacturer and marketer of adhesives, sealants, paints and other specialty chemical products. It operates in approximately 40 countries in North America, Europe, Latin America, the Asia Pacific region, the Middle East and Africa. The Company operates its business in four segments - Americas Adhesives, Construction Products, EIMEA (Europe, India, Middle East and Africa) and Asia Pacific The North America Adhesives, EIMEA, Latin America Adhesives and Asia Pacific operating segments produce and supply industrial adhesives products for applications in various markets including assembly (appliances, filters, construction, etc.), packaging (food and beverage containers, flexible packaging, consumer goods, package integrity and re-enforcement, durable and non-durable goods, etc.), converting (corrugation, tape and label, paper converting, envelopes, books, multi-wall bags and sacks), nonwoven and hygiene (disposable diapers, feminine care, medical garments, tissue and towel), performance wood (windows, doors, wood flooring) and textile (footwear, sportswear). The North America Adhesives operating segment includes a range of specialty adhesives such as thermoplastic, thermoset, reactive, water-based and solvent-based products. Sales are made mainly through a direct sales force with a smaller portion of sales through distributors. The Construction Products operating segment includes products used for tile setting (adhesives, grouts, mortars, sealers, levelers, etc.), heating, ventilation and air conditioning and insulation applications (duct sealants, weather barriers and fungicidal coatings, block fillers). Construction product sales are made through a direct sales force, distributors and retailers. The EIMEA operating segment is comprised of an adhesives components same as the North America Adhesives operating segment. EIMEA adhesives sales are made through both a direct sales force and distributors. The Latin America Adhesives operating segment is similar to that of the North America Adhesives operating segment and sales are made mainly through a direct sales force. The Latin America Paints operating segment has a market position in Central America under the Glidden and Protecto brands. Paint sales for residential and commercial applications (architectural, marine, highway safety, etc.) are made mainly through distributors and its network of retail stores located throughout Central America. The Asia Pacific operating segment is similar to that of the North America Adhesives operating segment, with one exception. The Asia Pacific operating segment also includes caulks and sealants for the consumer market, sold through retailers. Other adhesives sales are made through a direct sales force and distributors. The Company's customers include manufacturers of food and beverages, hygiene products, clothing, appliances, filters, construction materials, woo

Guru Investment Theses on H.B. Fuller Co

Bill Frels Comments on H.B. Fuller - Jun 25, 2014

Packaging and adhesive manufacturer H.B. Fuller (FUL) also disappointed, declining 7.23% due to weak revenue in Europe and slower than expected sales growth in the Americas. This company, along with Emerson Electric Company (EMR), which also detracted from the portfolio, was affected by the market’s rotation out of industrials stocks.



From Bill Frels' Mairs & Power Growth Fund First Quarter 2014 Commentary.



Check out Bill Frels latest stock trades

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 21.47
FUL's P/E(ttm) is ranked lower than
66% of the 873 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 16.46 vs. FUL: 21.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
FUL' s P/E(ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.68  Med: 16.27 Max: 171.33
Current: 21.47
8.68
171.33
Forward P/E 18.35
FUL's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
64% of the 108 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 15.55 vs. FUL: 18.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
PE(NRI) 21.47
FUL's PE(NRI) is ranked lower than
65% of the 854 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 16.73 vs. FUL: 21.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
FUL' s PE(NRI) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.78  Med: 21.39 Max: 171.33
Current: 21.47
8.78
171.33
Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) 19.17
FUL's Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) is ranked lower than
58% of the 463 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 16.89 vs. FUL: 19.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) only.
FUL' s Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.82  Med: 16.79 Max: 908.8
Current: 19.17
6.82
908.8
P/B 3.72
FUL's P/B is ranked lower than
68% of the 1060 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.62 vs. FUL: 3.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
FUL' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.93  Med: 1.95 Max: 2.87
Current: 3.72
0.93
2.87
P/S 1.07
FUL's P/S is ranked lower than
53% of the 1063 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.05 vs. FUL: 1.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
FUL' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.39  Med: 0.94 Max: 1.42
Current: 1.07
0.39
1.42
PFCF 16.80
FUL's PFCF is ranked lower than
61% of the 388 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 13.58 vs. FUL: 16.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
FUL' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.49  Med: 17.78 Max: 724.84
Current: 16.8
6.49
724.84
POCF 11.97
FUL's POCF is ranked lower than
69% of the 495 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 8.34 vs. FUL: 11.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
FUL' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.77  Med: 13.12 Max: 78.6
Current: 11.97
5.77
78.6
EV-to-EBIT 15.74
FUL's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
60% of the 892 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 12.84 vs. FUL: 15.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
FUL' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.2  Med: 14.80 Max: 1092.8
Current: 15.74
6.2
1092.8
EV-to-EBITDA 10.94
FUL's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
56% of the 929 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 9.84 vs. FUL: 10.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
FUL' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.6  Med: 10.40 Max: 24.4
Current: 10.94
4.6
24.4
PEG 2.89
FUL's PEG is ranked lower than
60% of the 425 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.22 vs. FUL: 2.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only.
FUL' s PEG Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.71  Med: 3.19 Max: 39.16
Current: 2.89
0.71
39.16
Shiller P/E 24.78
FUL's Shiller P/E is ranked higher than
54% of the 169 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 28.59 vs. FUL: 24.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
FUL' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.99  Med: 22.57 Max: 36.32
Current: 24.78
9.99
36.32
Current Ratio 2.09
FUL's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
62% of the 935 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.74 vs. FUL: 2.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
FUL' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.57  Med: 2.12 Max: 2.57
Current: 2.09
1.57
2.57
Quick Ratio 1.39
FUL's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
57% of the 935 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.24 vs. FUL: 1.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
FUL' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.96  Med: 1.49 Max: 2.04
Current: 1.39
0.96
2.04
Days Inventory 64.45
FUL's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
53% of the 1013 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 66.82 vs. FUL: 64.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
FUL' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 39.12  Med: 48.90 Max: 60.18
Current: 64.45
39.12
60.18
Days Sales Outstanding 62.39
FUL's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
51% of the 856 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 59.33 vs. FUL: 62.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
FUL' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 50.95  Med: 59.12 Max: 63.89
Current: 62.39
50.95
63.89
Days Payable 39.88
FUL's Days Payable is ranked lower than
59% of the 903 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 47.70 vs. FUL: 39.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
FUL' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 34.32  Med: 44.82 Max: 58.1
Current: 39.88
34.32
58.1

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 1.21
FUL's Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
76% of the 1046 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.23 vs. FUL: 1.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
FUL' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.74  Med: 1.15 Max: 2.57
Current: 1.21
0.74
2.57
Dividend Payout 0.27
FUL's Dividend Payout is ranked higher than
58% of the 693 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 0.31 vs. FUL: 0.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout only.
FUL' s Dividend Payout Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.09  Med: 0.24 Max: 5.4
Current: 0.27
0.09
5.4
Dividend Growth (3y) 15.60
FUL's Dividend Growth (3y) is ranked higher than
75% of the 538 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 4.00 vs. FUL: 15.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Growth (3y) only.
FUL' s Dividend Growth (3y) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.3  Med: 3.60 Max: 16
Current: 15.6
2.3
16
Forward Dividend Yield 1.20
FUL's Forward Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
77% of the 1013 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.37 vs. FUL: 1.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield only.
N/A
Yield on cost (5-Year) 2.31
FUL's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked lower than
57% of the 1215 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.63 vs. FUL: 2.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
FUL' s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.41  Med: 2.19 Max: 4.91
Current: 2.31
1.41
4.91
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -0.10
FUL's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
74% of the 469 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: -1.70 vs. FUL: -0.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
FUL' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.8  Med: -0.40 Max: 6.7
Current: -0.1
-1.8
6.7

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 3.72
FUL's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
89% of the 1012 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.71 vs. FUL: 3.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
FUL' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.54  Med: 2.61 Max: 9.25
Current: 3.72
1.54
9.25
Price/Projected FCF 1.73
FUL's Price/Projected FCF is ranked lower than
70% of the 510 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.16 vs. FUL: 1.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
FUL' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.72  Med: 1.60 Max: 28.36
Current: 1.73
0.72
28.36
Price/Median PS Value 1.14
FUL's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
56% of the 1044 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.14 vs. FUL: 1.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
FUL' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.37  Med: 0.73 Max: 1.36
Current: 1.14
0.37
1.36
Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value 2.31
FUL's Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value is ranked lower than
77% of the 231 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.25 vs. FUL: 2.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value only.
FUL' s Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.07  Med: 2.85 Max: 38.68
Current: 2.31
1.07
38.68
Price/Graham Number 2.63
FUL's Price/Graham Number is ranked lower than
78% of the 735 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.12 vs. FUL: 2.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
FUL' s Price/Graham Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.82  Med: 1.52 Max: 4.57
Current: 2.63
0.82
4.57
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 6.40
FUL's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
52% of the 1103 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 5.80 vs. FUL: 6.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
FUL' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.1  Med: 6.80 Max: 16
Current: 6.4
0.1
16
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 11.80
FUL's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
71% of the 553 Companies
in the Global Specialty Chemicals industry.

( Industry Median: 4.69 vs. FUL: 11.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
FUL' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.2  Med: 6.90 Max: 24.1
Current: 11.8
-1.2
24.1

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $2,079
EPS (TTM) $ 2.03
Beta1.72
Short Percentage of Float2.11%
52-Week Range $30.72 - 48.49
Shares Outstanding (Mil)50.00

Analyst Estimate

Nov16 Nov17 Nov18
Revenue (Mil $) 2,119 2,208 2,271
EPS ($) 2.56 2.97 3.30
EPS w/o NRI ($) 2.56 2.97 3.30
EPS Growth Rate
(3Y to 5Y Estimate)
N/A
» More Articles for FUL

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
David Winters' Most Heavily Weighted Trades In Q1 2015 Jun 08 2015 
Wintergreen Fund Buys CSX Corp in Q1 Jun 02 2015 
15 Cheap Dividend Achievers With Solid Fundamentals Dec 07 2014 
David Winters Purchases 3 New Stocks in Q3 Nov 30 2014 
David Winters Reduces Position in Google in Q3 Nov 21 2014 
Bill Frels Comments on H.B. Fuller Jun 25 2014 
Bill Frels' Mairs & Power Growth Fund First Quarter 2014 Commentary Jun 25 2014 
Bill Frels' Mairs & Power Balanced Fund Fourth Quarter Commentary Mar 08 2013 
The 10 Best Yielding Ex-Dividend Stocks on February 5, 2013 Feb 04 2013 
H.B. Fuller Co: Fundamental Stock Research Analysis Jan 18 2013 

More From Other Websites
FULLER H B CO Files SEC form 10-Q, Quarterly Report Jun 24 2016
Edited Transcript of FUL earnings conference call or presentation 23-Jun-16 2:30pm GMT Jun 23 2016
HB Fuller Co Earnings Call scheduled for 10:30 am ET today Jun 23 2016
FULLER H B CO Files SEC form 8-K, Results of Operations and Financial Condition, Financial... Jun 23 2016
H.B. Fuller Reports Second Quarter 2016 Results Jun 22 2016
H. B. Fuller misses 2Q profit forecasts Jun 22 2016
H.B. Fuller Reports Second Quarter 2016 Results Jun 22 2016
Q2 2016 HB Fuller Co Earnings Release - After Market Close Jun 22 2016
H.B. Fuller Announces Conference Call and Webcast to Discuss Second Quarter 2016 Results Jun 16 2016
H.B. Fuller Announces Conference Call and Webcast to Discuss Second Quarter 2016 Results Jun 16 2016
FullSix SpA :FUL-IT: Earnings Analysis: Q1, 2016 By the Numbers : June 13, 2016 Jun 13 2016
ETF’s with exposure to H.B. Fuller Co. : June 7, 2016 Jun 07 2016
FULLER H B CO Files SEC form 8-K, Regulation FD Disclosure, Financial Statements and Exhibits Jun 07 2016
H.B. Fuller Company Agrees to Acquire Cyberbond, L.L.C. Jun 06 2016
H.B. Fuller Company Agrees to Acquire Cyberbond, L.L.C. Jun 06 2016
H.B. Fuller Co. :FUL-US: Earnings Analysis: Q1, 2016 By the Numbers : June 6, 2016 Jun 06 2016
HB Fuller (FUL) Hits a New 52-Week High on Solid Prospects Jun 06 2016
FULLER H B CO Files SEC form 8-K, Other Events, Financial Statements and Exhibits Jun 01 2016
H.B. Fuller Company in Partnership with Rem Brands, Inc. May 03 2016
H.B. Fuller Company in Partnership with Rem Brands, Inc. May 03 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)