Switch to:
Also traded in: Argentina, Germany, Mexico

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.09
IP's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
83% of the 305 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 0.51 vs. IP: 0.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
IP' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.04  Med: 0.13 Max: 0.4
Current: 0.09
0.04
0.4
Equity-to-Asset 0.13
IP's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
93% of the 295 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 0.50 vs. IP: 0.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
IP' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.13  Med: 0.25 Max: 0.36
Current: 0.13
0.13
0.36
Interest Coverage 2.30
IP's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
82% of the 296 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 11.09 vs. IP: 2.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
IP' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.67  Med: 3.06 Max: 4.29
Current: 2.3
1.67
4.29
Piotroski F-Score: 5
Altman Z-Score: 1.55
Beneish M-Score: -2.54
WACC vs ROIC
12.27%
8.77%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 7.59
IP's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
62% of the 301 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 5.71 vs. IP: 7.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
IP' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.85  Med: 7.89 Max: 10.66
Current: 7.59
3.85
10.66
Net Margin % 4.29
IP's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
51% of the 301 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 4.25 vs. IP: 4.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
IP' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.16  Med: 3.91 Max: 5.94
Current: 4.29
-5.16
5.94
ROE % 21.84
IP's ROE % is ranked higher than
86% of the 295 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 8.03 vs. IP: 21.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
IP' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -19.97  Med: 13.53 Max: 21.98
Current: 21.84
-19.97
21.98
ROA % 2.84
IP's ROA % is ranked lower than
57% of the 308 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 3.65 vs. IP: 2.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
IP' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.02  Med: 2.77 Max: 5.05
Current: 2.84
-5.02
5.05
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 11.02
IP's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
54% of the 307 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 12.97 vs. IP: 11.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
IP' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.84  Med: 10.98 Max: 16.52
Current: 11.02
-3.84
16.52
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -1.10
IP's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
73% of the 279 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 3.20 vs. IP: -1.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
IP' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -10.1  Med: -1.1 Max: 11.5
Current: -1.1
-10.1
11.5
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -3.40
IP's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
73% of the 248 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 6.00 vs. IP: -3.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
IP' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -25.5  Med: -1.6 Max: 66.2
Current: -3.4
-25.5
66.2
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -16.80
IP's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
81% of the 234 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 5.90 vs. IP: -16.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
IP' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -31.2  Med: -5.4 Max: 114.1
Current: -16.8
-31.2
114.1
GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Signs with International Paper Co $IP.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» IP's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-04-27)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2016

IP Guru Trades in Q1 2016

David Dreman 18,021 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 17,447 sh (+79.35%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 5,707,308 sh (+13.77%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 1,242,532 sh (+8.70%)
T Rowe Price Equity Income Fund 6,867,400 sh (+4.05%)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 58,222 sh (-1.62%)
Mario Gabelli 42,030 sh (-3.45%)
Richard Snow 1,544,293 sh (-4.35%)
Pioneer Investments 238,682 sh (-33.12%)
Ray Dalio 111,222 sh (-68.29%)
» More
Q2 2016

IP Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Joel Greenblatt 48,692 sh (+179.09%)
Ray Dalio 145,509 sh (+30.83%)
Pioneer Investments 303,904 sh (+27.33%)
Mario Gabelli 42,030 sh (unchged)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 58,197 sh (-0.04%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 5,626,139 sh (-1.42%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 1,222,232 sh (-1.63%)
David Dreman 17,425 sh (-3.31%)
Richard Snow 1,443,179 sh (-6.55%)
T Rowe Price Equity Income Fund 6,025,000 sh (-12.27%)
» More
Q3 2016

IP Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Steven Cohen 730,300 sh (New)
Caxton Associates 200,000 sh (New)
Pioneer Investments 435,355 sh (+43.25%)
Ray Dalio 176,140 sh (+21.05%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 58,464 sh (+0.46%)
David Dreman 17,425 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen 50,000 sh (unchged)
Mario Gabelli 42,030 sh (unchged)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 1,187,032 sh (-2.88%)
Richard Snow 1,359,506 sh (-5.80%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 4,943,439 sh (-12.13%)
T Rowe Price Equity Income Fund 5,125,000 sh (-14.94%)
Joel Greenblatt 12,144 sh (-75.06%)
» More
Q4 2016

IP Guru Trades in Q4 2016

First Eagle Investment 854,881 sh (New)
Jeremy Grantham 172,800 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 27,240 sh (+124.31%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 64,419 sh (+10.19%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 1,229,832 sh (+3.61%)
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Caxton Associates Sold Out
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 4,878,739 sh (-1.31%)
Mario Gabelli 40,730 sh (-3.09%)
T Rowe Price Equity Income Fund 4,800,000 sh (-6.34%)
Pioneer Investments 400,851 sh (-7.93%)
Richard Snow 1,233,119 sh (-9.30%)
David Dreman 11,892 sh (-31.75%)
Ray Dalio 62,819 sh (-64.34%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with IP

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Preferred stocks of International Paper Co

SymbolPriceYieldDescription
INPAP95.004.17USD 4.00 Cum.Preferred Shares

Business Description

Industry: Packaging & Containers » Packaging & Containers    NAICS: 322212    SIC: 2657
Compare:NYSE:WRK, NYSE:BLL, OTCPK:AMCRY, NYSE:SEE, NYSE:PKG, OTCPK:CCDBF, NYSE:CCK, NYSE:BERY, OTCPK:SMFTF, NYSE:SON, NYSE:ATR, NYSE:BMS, NYSE:GPK, NYSE:GEF, NAS:SLGN, NYSE:OI, NYSE:TUP, OTCPK:WIPKF, OTCPK:VITOF, NAS:MINI » details
Traded in other countries:IP.Argentina, INP.Germany, IP.Mexico,
International Paper Co produces and distributes printing paper, packaging, forest products, and chemical products. The Company operates in four segments namely industrial packaging; printing papers; consumer packaging, and distribution.

International Paper Co is a New York corporation, incorporated in 1941 as the successor to the New York Corporation of the same name organized in 1898. The Company is a paper and packaging company with markets and manufacturing operations in North America, Europe, Latin America, Russia, Asia, Africa and the Middle East. It operates approximately 24 pulp, paper and packaging mills, 169 converting and packaging plants, 16 recycling plants and three bag facilities. The Company's businesses are separated into three segments namely Industrial Packaging, Printing Papers, and Consumer Packaging. International Paper segment is a manufacturer of containerboard in the United States. Its products include linerboard, medium, whitetop, recycled linerboard, recycled medium and saturating kraft. The International Paper segment produces printing and writing papers. Products in this segment include uncoated papers and pulp. It produces papers for use in copiers, desktop and laser printers and digital imaging. End use applications include advertising and promotional materials such as brochures, pamphlets, greeting cards, books, annual reports and direct mail. Uncoated papers are sold under private label and International Paper brand names. Industrial Packaging products are closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods production, as well as with demand for processed foods, poultry, meat and agricultural products. The Company's products compete with similar products produced by other forest products companies. It also competes, in some instances, with companies in other industries and against substitutes for wood and wood-fiber products. Its trademarks include Hammermill, Springhill, Williamsburg, Postmark, Accent, Great White, Chamex, Ballet, Rey, Pol, and Svetocopy. The Company's operations are subject to U.S. and non-U.S. laws and regulations relating to the environment, health and safety.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 24.07
IP's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
76% of the 244 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 14.98 vs. IP: 24.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
IP' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.4  Med: 17.53 Max: 55.15
Current: 24.07
5.4
55.15
Forward PE Ratio 14.68
IP's Forward PE Ratio is ranked higher than
71% of the 34 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 17.04 vs. IP: 14.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 23.96
IP's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
76% of the 243 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 14.98 vs. IP: 23.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
IP' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.02  Med: 16.94 Max: 55.15
Current: 23.96
5.02
55.15
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 18.34
IP's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked lower than
56% of the 128 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 15.37 vs. IP: 18.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
IP' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.33  Med: 12.5 Max: 833.53
Current: 18.34
3.33
833.53
PB Ratio 5.00
IP's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
92% of the 289 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.24 vs. IP: 5.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
IP' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.42  Med: 2.15 Max: 5.43
Current: 5
0.42
5.43
PS Ratio 1.04
IP's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
62% of the 297 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 0.78 vs. IP: 1.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
IP' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.07  Med: 0.73 Max: 1.13
Current: 1.04
0.07
1.13
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 19.36
IP's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
61% of the 122 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 15.27 vs. IP: 19.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
IP' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.81  Med: 11.81 Max: 84.52
Current: 19.36
0.81
84.52
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 8.83
IP's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
53% of the 158 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 9.22 vs. IP: 8.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
IP' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.56  Med: 6.66 Max: 18.44
Current: 8.83
0.56
18.44
EV-to-EBIT 19.38
IP's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
75% of the 222 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 12.15 vs. IP: 19.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
IP' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -113.3  Med: 12.9 Max: 143.1
Current: 19.38
-113.3
143.1
EV-to-EBITDA 11.11
IP's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
64% of the 240 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 9.08 vs. IP: 11.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
IP' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.8  Med: 8.05 Max: 41.5
Current: 11.11
2.8
41.5
Shiller PE Ratio 30.62
IP's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked lower than
61% of the 51 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 24.36 vs. IP: 30.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
IP' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.37  Med: 30.28 Max: 93.96
Current: 30.62
9.37
93.96
Current Ratio 1.71
IP's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
60% of the 250 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.49 vs. IP: 1.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
IP' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.22  Med: 1.7 Max: 2.37
Current: 1.71
1.22
2.37
Quick Ratio 1.11
IP's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
50% of the 250 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.11 vs. IP: 1.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
IP' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.65  Med: 1.12 Max: 1.98
Current: 1.11
0.65
1.98
Days Inventory 54.30
IP's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
57% of the 284 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 60.43 vs. IP: 54.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
IP' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 44.46  Med: 55.47 Max: 62.26
Current: 54.3
44.46
62.26
Days Sales Outstanding 51.96
IP's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
79% of the 219 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 69.43 vs. IP: 51.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
IP' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 42.1  Med: 48.61 Max: 58.38
Current: 51.96
42.1
58.38
Days Payable 55.62
IP's Days Payable is ranked higher than
55% of the 200 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 51.02 vs. IP: 55.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
IP' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 41.27  Med: 49.92 Max: 66.26
Current: 55.62
41.27
66.26

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 3.41
IP's Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
75% of the 314 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 2.12 vs. IP: 3.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
IP' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.35  Med: 2.94 Max: 24.81
Current: 3.41
0.35
24.81
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.81
IP's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked lower than
67% of the 213 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 0.30 vs. IP: 0.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
IP' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.21  Med: 0.36 Max: 1.11
Current: 0.81
0.21
1.11
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 12.60
IP's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked higher than
72% of the 157 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 3.70 vs. IP: 12.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
IP' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -31.2  Med: 0 Max: 49.6
Current: 12.6
-31.2
49.6
Forward Dividend Yield % 3.50
IP's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
73% of the 303 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 2.58 vs. IP: 3.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 6.36
IP's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked higher than
86% of the 398 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 2.59 vs. IP: 6.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
IP' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.66  Med: 5.51 Max: 46.53
Current: 6.36
0.66
46.53
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 2.00
IP's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
93% of the 131 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: -1.40 vs. IP: 2.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
IP' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -16.8  Med: 0 Max: 4.5
Current: 2
-16.8
4.5

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 50.21
IP's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
99% of the 271 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.29 vs. IP: 50.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
IP' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.69  Med: 3.41 Max: 100.8
Current: 50.21
1.69
100.8
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 1.25
IP's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
51% of the 116 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.20 vs. IP: 1.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
IP' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.33  Med: 0.98 Max: 1.87
Current: 1.25
0.33
1.87
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.43
IP's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
63% of the 259 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.26 vs. IP: 1.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
IP' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.27  Med: 1.01 Max: 1.43
Current: 1.43
0.27
1.43
Price-to-Graham-Number 7.32
IP's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked lower than
97% of the 177 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 0.93 vs. IP: 7.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
IP' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.15  Med: 2.7 Max: 8.71
Current: 7.32
1.15
8.71
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 5.20
IP's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
60% of the 276 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 6.80 vs. IP: 5.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
IP' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.7  Med: 7.5 Max: 29.5
Current: 5.2
0.7
29.5
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 3.46
IP's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
57% of the 179 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 6.03 vs. IP: 3.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
IP' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.5  Med: 16.15 Max: 77
Current: 3.46
-1.5
77

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $21,079
EPS (TTM) $ 2.19
Beta1.80
Short Percentage of Float2.41%
52-Week Range $35.16 - 58.86
Shares Outstanding (Mil)411.26

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 22,521 22,751 23,291
EPS ($) 3.58 3.97 4.17
EPS without NRI ($) 3.58 3.97 4.17
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
3.27%
Dividends per Share ($) 1.83 1.83 1.72
» More Articles for IP

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
This Global Paper Giant Looks Promising Feb 10 2017 
Fiscal Policy, Monetary Policy and Donald Trump Nov 30 2016 
Several Companies Reach 52-Week Highs Sep 20 2016 
Hotchkis & Wiley's Best Investments Year to Date Jul 15 2016 
International Paper a Good Pick in Industry May 31 2016 
This Global Paper Giant Looks Good Feb 05 2016 
Long-Term Investors Should Be Buying - AFAM Capital Jan 25 2016 
Western Union, Wells Fargo Among Popular High Yield Guru Stocks Jan 25 2016 
Hotchkis & Wiley Invest in International Paper, Packaging Corp. of America and Eaton Dec 28 2015 
Weekly 3-Year Low Highlights: International Paper, Nucor, Macy's, Harley-Davidson Dec 17 2015 

More From Other Websites
International Paper Announces Senior Leadership Moves Feb 22 2017
International Paper Once Again Selected to FORTUNE's List of America's Most Admired Companies Feb 16 2017
International Paper Incoming CFO to Speak at Barclays Industrial Select Conference on February 23 Feb 15 2017
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO /NEW/ Files SEC form 8-K, Change in Directors or Principal Officers,... Feb 15 2017
International Paper's Board of Directors Elects Dr. Kathryn D. Sullivan to Its Board Feb 15 2017
This Global Paper Giant Looks Promising Feb 10 2017
Paper Weights: What's Got Barclays Downgrading Paper Stocks Feb 06 2017
Intl Paper downgraded by Barclays Feb 06 2017
International Paper Co. :IP-US: Earnings Analysis: Q4, 2016 By the Numbers : February 6, 2017 Feb 06 2017
International Paper Co. :IP-US: Earnings Analysis: 2016 By the Numbers : February 3, 2017 Feb 03 2017
International Paper Co. :IP-US: Earnings Analysis: Q4, 2016 By the Numbers : February 3, 2017 Feb 03 2017
International Paper: Cramer's Top Takeaways Feb 03 2017
Cramer Remix: This is the chance to buy Amazon, not sell ... Feb 02 2017
International Paper CEO explains what really triggered sh... Feb 02 2017
International Paper shares slide after earnings decline year-over-year Feb 02 2017
Edited Transcript of IP earnings conference call or presentation 2-Feb-17 3:00pm GMT Feb 02 2017
International Paper (IP) Surpasses Q4 Earnings & Revenues Feb 02 2017
International Paper (IP) Beats Both Q4 Earnings & Revenues Feb 02 2017
International Paper beats Street 4Q forecasts Feb 02 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)