Hide

FocusBar

Subscribe to Premium Member
Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 9/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 3.457
MIND's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
57% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Rental & Leasing Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.26 vs. MIND: 3.457 )
MIND' s 10-Year Cash to Debt Range
Min: 0.39   Max: No Debt
Current: 3.46

Equity to Asset 0.882
MIND's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
95% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Rental & Leasing Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.35 vs. MIND: 0.882 )
MIND' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: 0.62   Max: 0.96
Current: 0.88

0.62
0.96
Interest Coverage No Debt
MIND's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
81% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Rental & Leasing Services industry.

( Industry Median: 20.00 vs. MIND: No Debt )
MIND' s 10-Year Interest Coverage Range
Min: 2   Max: No Debt
Current: No Debt

F-Score: 6
Z-Score: 9.77
M-Score: -3.23
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 13.30
MIND's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
85% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Rental & Leasing Services industry.

( Industry Median: 8.50 vs. MIND: 13.30 )
MIND' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: -68.9   Max: 30.6
Current: 13.3

-68.9
30.6
Net-margin (%) 16.3
MIND's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
81% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Rental & Leasing Services industry.

( Industry Median: 4.80 vs. MIND: 16.3 )
MIND' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: -52.7   Max: 31.4
Current: 16.3

-52.7
31.4
ROE (%) 9.7
MIND's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
77% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Rental & Leasing Services industry.

( Industry Median: 8.40 vs. MIND: 9.7 )
MIND' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: -30   Max: 22.9
Current: 9.7

-30
22.9
ROA (%) 9
MIND's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
81% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Rental & Leasing Services industry.

( Industry Median: 3.20 vs. MIND: 9 )
MIND' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: -22.8   Max: 18.8
Current: 9

-22.8
18.8
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 9.10
MIND's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
83% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Rental & Leasing Services industry.

( Industry Median: 11.60 vs. MIND: 9.10 )
MIND' s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: -32.6   Max: 31.7
Current: 9.1

-32.6
31.7
Revenue Growth (%) 9.3
MIND's Revenue Growth (%) is ranked higher than
93% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Rental & Leasing Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.10 vs. MIND: 9.3 )
MIND' s 10-Year Revenue Growth (%) Range
Min: -6.4   Max: 27.3
Current: 9.3

-6.4
27.3
EBITDA Growth (%) 17
MIND's EBITDA Growth (%) is ranked higher than
93% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Rental & Leasing Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.10 vs. MIND: 17 )
MIND' s 10-Year EBITDA Growth (%) Range
Min: -5.9   Max: 40.4
Current: 17

-5.9
40.4
EPS Growth (%) 125.4
MIND's EPS Growth (%) is ranked higher than
95% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Rental & Leasing Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.50 vs. MIND: 125.4 )
MIND' s 10-Year EPS Growth (%) Range
Min: -51.8   Max: 125.4
Current: 125.4

-51.8
125.4
» MIND's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2012

MIND Guru Trades in Q2 2012

Paul Tudor Jones 16,600 sh (New)
John Rogers 963,491 sh (+407.73%)
Jim Simons 169,700 sh (-24.38%)
» More
Q3 2012

MIND Guru Trades in Q3 2012

John Rogers 1,669,867 sh (+73.31%)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Jim Simons 106,700 sh (-37.12%)
» More
Q4 2012

MIND Guru Trades in Q4 2012

Chuck Royce 46,800 sh (New)
Whitney Tilson 100,000 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 11,000 sh (New)
John Rogers 2,053,277 sh (+22.96%)
Zeke Ashton 75,000 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons 51,000 sh (-52.2%)
» More
Q1 2013

MIND Guru Trades in Q1 2013

John Rogers 2,481,998 sh (+20.88%)
Chuck Royce 46,800 sh (unchged)
Zeke Ashton 25,000 sh (unchged)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Whitney Tilson 50,000 sh (-50%)
Jim Simons 14,300 sh (-71.96%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with MIND

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
Whitney Tilson 2013-03-31 Reduce -50%0.55%$13.63 - $17.74 $ 15.692%50000
John Rogers 2013-03-31 Add 20.88%0.12%$13.63 - $17.74 $ 15.692%2481998
Whitney Tilson 2012-12-31 New Buy1.1%$11.98 - $16.2 $ 15.6913%100000
John Rogers 2012-12-31 Add 22.96%0.11%$11.98 - $16.2 $ 15.6913%2053277
John Rogers 2012-09-30 Add 73.31%0.24%$14.63 - $18.42 $ 15.69-7%1669867
John Rogers 2012-06-30 Add 407.73%0.29%$16.24 - $25.41 $ 15.69-22%963491
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 12.40
MIND's P/E(ttm) is ranked higher than
91% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Rental & Leasing Services industry.

( Industry Median: 15.70 vs. MIND: 12.40 )
MIND' s 10-Year P/E(ttm) Range
Min: 2.76   Max: 258
Current: 12.4

2.76
258
P/B 1.14
MIND's P/B is ranked higher than
56% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Rental & Leasing Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.27 vs. MIND: 1.14 )
MIND' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 0.28   Max: 5.15
Current: 1.14

0.28
5.15
P/S 1.97
MIND's P/S is ranked lower than
70% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Rental & Leasing Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.89 vs. MIND: 1.97 )
MIND' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 0.37   Max: 6.87
Current: 1.97

0.37
6.87
PFCF 27.70
MIND's PFCF is ranked lower than
66% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Rental & Leasing Services industry.

( Industry Median: 10.00 vs. MIND: 27.70 )
MIND' s 10-Year PFCF Range
Min: 4.05   Max: 104.78
Current: 27.7

4.05
104.78
EV-to-EBIT 13.19
MIND's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
94% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Rental & Leasing Services industry.

( Industry Median: 16.80 vs. MIND: 13.19 )
MIND' s 10-Year EV-to-EBIT Range
Min: 2.2   Max: 1287.7
Current: 13.19

2.2
1287.7
PEG 0.73
MIND's PEG is ranked higher than
95% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Rental & Leasing Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.20 vs. MIND: 0.73 )
MIND' s 10-Year PEG Range
Min: 0.13   Max: 19.4
Current: 0.73

0.13
19.4
Shiller P/E 15.44
MIND's Shiller P/E is ranked higher than
87% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Rental & Leasing Services industry.

( Industry Median: 12.55 vs. MIND: 15.44 )
MIND' s 10-Year Shiller P/E Range
Min: 4.12   Max: 89.43
Current: 15.44

4.12
89.43

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Net Cash 190.2
MIND's Price/Net Cash is ranked higher than
99% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Rental & Leasing Services industry.

( Industry Median: 28.50 vs. MIND: 190.2 )
MIND' s 10-Year Price/Net Cash Range
Min: 3.5   Max: 185.3
Current: 190.2

3.5
185.3
Price/Net Current Asset Value 9.1
MIND's Price/Net Current Asset Value is ranked higher than
84% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Rental & Leasing Services industry.

( Industry Median: 8.00 vs. MIND: 9.1 )
MIND' s 10-Year Price/Net Current Asset Value Range
Min: 3.1   Max: 31.9
Current: 9.1

3.1
31.9
Price/Tangible Book 1.2
MIND's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
64% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Rental & Leasing Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.80 vs. MIND: 1.2 )
MIND' s 10-Year Price/Tangible Book Range
Min: 0.4   Max: 5.9
Current: 1.2

0.4
5.9
Price/DCF (Projected) 1.3
MIND's Price/DCF (Projected) is ranked higher than
94% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Rental & Leasing Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.05 vs. MIND: 1.3 )
MIND' s 10-Year Price/DCF (Projected) Range
Min: 1.1   Max: 17.1
Current: 1.3

1.1
17.1
Price/Median PS Value 1
MIND's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
68% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Rental & Leasing Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.00 vs. MIND: 1 )
MIND' s 10-Year Price/Median PS Value Range
Min: 0.3   Max: 4
Current: 1

0.3
4
Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value 0.7
MIND's Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value is ranked higher than
98% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Rental & Leasing Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.75 vs. MIND: 0.7 )
MIND' s 10-Year Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value Range
Min: 0.2   Max: 13.7
Current: 0.7

0.2
13.7
Price/Graham Number 0.8
MIND's Price/Graham Number is ranked lower than
76% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Rental & Leasing Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.90 vs. MIND: 0.8 )
MIND' s 10-Year Price/Graham Number Range
Min: 0.3   Max: 2.5
Current: 0.8

0.3
2.5
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) 7.60
MIND's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) is ranked higher than
93% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Rental & Leasing Services industry.

( Industry Median: 6.65 vs. MIND: 7.60 )
MIND' s 10-Year Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) Range
Min: 0.1   Max: 46
Current: 7.6

0.1
46
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) 20.08
MIND's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) is ranked higher than
91% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Rental & Leasing Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.41 vs. MIND: 20.08 )
MIND' s 10-Year Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) Range
Min: -14.4   Max: 31.9
Current: 20.08

-14.4
31.9

Business Description

Mitcham Industries, Inc., a Texas corporation, was incorporated in 1987. The Company lease and sell geophysical and other equipment used by seismic data acquisition contractors to perform seismic data acquisition surveys on land, in transition zones and deep water marine areas. The Company conducts its business on a worldwide basis. It operates in two business segments, equipment leasing and manufacturing. Its Equipment Leasing segment is engaged in the leasing of seismic equipment to companies in the oil and gas industry throughout the world. It conducts its leasing business through MII, its wholly-owned subsidiaries and its branches in Colombia and Peru. It also sells new and used seismic equipment from time to time. The subsidiaries that conduct its leasing business are Mitcham Canada ULC, Seismic Asia Pacific Pty Ltd., Mitcham Seismic Eurasia LLC, and Absolute Equipment Solutions, Inc.. Its manufacturing segment is engaged in the design, production and sale of marine seismic equipment. The operations of this segment are conducted through wholly-owned subsidiaries, Seamap (UK) Ltd and Seamap Pte. Its equipment is utilized in a variety of geographic regions throughout the world, which are described under "Customers, Sales, Backlog and Marketing." It owns a variety of technologically advanced equipment acquired from the leading seismic manufacturers. Its lease pool includes many types of equipment used in seismic data acquisition, including various electronic components of land, transition zone and marine seismic data acquisition systems, geophones and cables, peripheral equipment, survey and other equipment. The majority of its seismic equipment lease pool is provided by the Sercel subsidiaries of Compagnie Generale de Geophysique-Veritas. The Company leases its equipment on a short-term basis, for two to six months, to seismic contractors who need additional capacity to complete a seismic survey. The Company's major competitors are the major seismic equipment manufacturers who sell equipment on financed terms and seismic contractors. The Company is subject to stringent governmental laws and regulations pertaining to protection of the environment and the manner in which chemicals and materials used in its manufacturing processes are handled and wastes generated from such operations are disposed.
Company Website
SEC Reports
Industry: Rental & Leasing Services
Compare:BOX, TAL, HTZ, URI, AYR
Traded in other countries:MI7.Germany

Personalized Checklist








Within your circle of competence?
Macro economic environment favorable?
High quality business?
Enough margin of safety with stocks?
Gurus are buying?
Insiders are buying?
Management capable and shareholder friendly?
Catalyst for stock price to appreciate?
Your level of confidence with the research?

GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names
Free 7-day Trial