Switch to:
Also traded in: Canada, Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.20
NAS:RGLD's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
83% of the 1465 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 17.27 vs. NAS:RGLD: 0.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
NAS:RGLD' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.16  Med: 29.5 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.2
Equity to Asset 0.71
NAS:RGLD's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
68% of the 737 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 0.60 vs. NAS:RGLD: 0.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
NAS:RGLD' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.66  Med: 0.89 Max: 0.97
Current: 0.71
0.66
0.97
Interest Coverage 0.71
NAS:RGLD's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
96% of the 1031 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 10000.00 vs. NAS:RGLD: 0.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NAS:RGLD' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.15  Med: 12.61 Max: 27.74
Current: 0.71
0.15
27.74
F-Score: 6
Z-Score: 3.20
M-Score: -2.59
WACC vs ROIC
8.57%
0.37%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 6.08
NAS:RGLD's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
68% of the 767 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 0.31 vs. NAS:RGLD: 6.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
NAS:RGLD' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.34  Med: 48.81 Max: 59.64
Current: 6.08
1.34
59.64
Net-margin (%) -0.57
NAS:RGLD's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
52% of the 769 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: -1.19 vs. NAS:RGLD: -0.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
NAS:RGLD' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -21.44  Med: 29.7 Max: 51.98
Current: -0.57
-21.44
51.98
ROE (%) -0.10
NAS:RGLD's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
72% of the 1346 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: -10.91 vs. NAS:RGLD: -0.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
NAS:RGLD' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.37  Med: 4.15 Max: 8.2
Current: -0.1
-3.37
8.2
ROA (%) -0.07
NAS:RGLD's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
73% of the 1490 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: -8.93 vs. NAS:RGLD: -0.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
NAS:RGLD' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.58  Med: 3.21 Max: 7.46
Current: -0.07
-2.58
7.46
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 1.11
NAS:RGLD's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
72% of the 1421 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: -12.57 vs. NAS:RGLD: 1.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
NAS:RGLD' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.44  Med: 7.78 Max: 21.04
Current: 1.11
0.44
21.04
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 6.60
NAS:RGLD's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
76% of the 634 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: -3.90 vs. NAS:RGLD: 6.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
NAS:RGLD' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.3  Med: 18.9 Max: 127
Current: 6.6
-2.3
127
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) -15.70
NAS:RGLD's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
54% of the 1039 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: -18.30 vs. NAS:RGLD: -15.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
NAS:RGLD' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -15.7  Med: 19.2 Max: 76.3
Current: -15.7
-15.7
76.3
» NAS:RGLD's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Oprt. Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q4 2015

RGLD Guru Trades in Q4 2015

RS Investment Management 126,730 sh (New)
Jim Simons 330,200 sh (+9.13%)
Mario Gabelli 17,430 sh (+4.18%)
First Eagle Investment 4,246,460 sh (+0.56%)
Chuck Royce 19,900 sh (unchged)
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Julian Robertson Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Ray Dalio 73,600 sh (-14.72%)
Murray Stahl 472,800 sh (-33.97%)
» More
Q1 2016

RGLD Guru Trades in Q1 2016

John Hussman 25,000 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 13,716 sh (New)
Chuck Royce 39,900 sh (+100.50%)
Murray Stahl 476,724 sh (+0.83%)
Paul Tudor Jones 26,500 sh (unchged)
Mario Gabelli 17,430 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
First Eagle Investment 4,233,693 sh (-0.30%)
Ray Dalio 55,500 sh (-24.59%)
RS Investment Management 320 sh (-99.75%)
» More
Q2 2016

RGLD Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Chuck Royce 39,900 sh (unchged)
Mario Gabelli 17,430 sh (unchged)
John Hussman 25,000 sh (unchged)
RS Investment Management 320 sh (unchged)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
First Eagle Investment 4,191,783 sh (-0.99%)
Murray Stahl 458,611 sh (-3.80%)
Ray Dalio 47,600 sh (-14.23%)
» More
Q3 2016

RGLD Guru Trades in Q3 2016

John Burbank 3,330 sh (New)
Jim Simons 267,309 sh (New)
Chuck Royce 56,500 sh (+41.60%)
Ray Dalio 55,500 sh (+16.60%)
Mario Gabelli 17,430 sh (unchged)
Murray Stahl 441,669 sh (-3.69%)
First Eagle Investment 3,243,706 sh (-22.62%)
John Hussman 15,000 sh (-40.00%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with RGLD

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Metals & Mining » Gold
Compare:NYSE:AU, NYSE:KGC, NYSE:AUY, NYSE:GFI, OTCPK:CAHPF, AMEX:BTG, OTCPK:DRGDF, NYSE:SBGL, NYSE:EGO, AMEX:NGD, OTCPK:CELTF, NYSE:AGI, NYSE:IAG, OTCPK:NESRF, OTCPK:EDVMF, OTCPK:CAGDF, OTCPK:TORXF, OTCPK:RGRNF, NYSE:HMY, OTCPK:SEMFF » details
Traded in other countries:RGL.Canada, RG3.Germany,
Royal Gold Inc together with its subsidiaries is engaged in acquiring and managing precious metals royalties, precious metals streams and similar interests.

Royal Gold Inc was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on January 5, 1981. The Company together with its subsidiaries is engaged in the business of acquiring and managing precious metals royalties and similar interests. It is engaged in a continual review of opportunities to acquire existing stream and royalty interests, to establish new streams on operating mines, to create new stream and royalty interests through the financing of mine development or exploration, or to acquire companies that hold stream and royalty interests. The Company owns royalty interests approximately on 34 producing properties, 21 development stage properties and 131 exploration stage properties, of which it considers 50 to be evaluation stage projects. It competes with other streaming and royalty companies, mine operators, and financial buyers in efforts to acquire existing royalty interests, and with the lenders, investors, and streaming and royalty companies providing financing to operators of mineral properties in its efforts to create new royalty interests.

Guru Investment Theses on Royal Gold Inc

Meridian Funds Comments on Royal Gold Inc. - Mar 08, 2016

Royal Gold, Inc. (NASDAQ:RGLD) is a precious metals company with royalty claims on gold, silver, copper, lead, and zinc at mines in over 20 countries. While gold performed better than other commodities during the period, the precious metal declined as U.S. monetary policy tightened and the dollar appreciated. Another setback for the company was the deferral of gold from a mine in Chile operated by Barrick Gold, which temporarily stopped construction at the mine. However, we believe Royal Gold has an exceptional business model and we view our investment in the company as a great way to get exposure to gold. The company essentially pays miners upfront for the right to buy their metals later at reduced prices. It has no operational risk because it owns no mines, is a beneficiary of ounces growth, has pricing power, and typically earns an 8% return on a flat price. We have decided to be patient with Royal Gold and maintained a position in the stock.





From the Meridian Equity Income Fund fourth quarter commentary.



Check out Meridian Funds latest stock trades

Murray Stahl’s Horizon Kinetics Comments on Royal Gold Inc - Dec 22, 2014

An idiosyncratic security with benefits – a diversifier

Let’s find a contrasting investment to a utility index or a REIT index, which are front and center as bond substitutes or asset allocation building blocks. They are therefore closely governed in valuation and price behavior by the asset flows of index investors and, so, might be particularly vulnerable to a rise in interest rates. Consider, instead, a very distinctive security like Royal Gold, Inc (RGLD). It is categorized in financial securities databases like a gold mining company. Yet it does not do any mining, and on a balance sheet and income statement basis has as little in common with gold mining as Microsoft (MSFT): it has virtually no property, plant, or equipment, it carries no net debt, it has extremely high after-tax cash flow margins—well over 50%. Microsoft’s are roughly 25%. Its financial statements and casually observable economics say that it really does not belong with the gold mining group.

Royal Gold is one of several publicly traded precious metals royalty companies. They solve a unique problem of miners, which must find a way to fund the massive capital costs of developing a new mine yet cannot afford the risk of taking on too much debt, since such a project might not be productive for many years, during which time input and output costs can drastically alter the anticipated profitability. The standard alternative, issuing more shares, is often too dilutive. The royalty companies extend cash to a miner in exchange for a percentage of the production. The royalty company is not directly exposed to the operating costs or liabilities of the miner and earns its revenues even if the miner produces at only a breakeven level of profitability.

However, the royalty business is far better than merely that. When Royal Gold purchases a revenue interest, it might be for the life of the mine, which could exceed 20 years. But the purchase price is calculated as the present value of the future estimated revenues, based on the current gold price. As an example, if the interest rate used to calculate that present value is 10%, and if the mine will start production next year, then the price paid for the first year’s production will be 10% less than the gold price. So, if today’s gold price is $1,300 per ounce, Royal Gold will pay only $1,170 for next year’s gold production. But the 2nd year’s production will cost 10% less than that, or $1,050. The 20th year’s gold price for Royal Gold would be only 15% of today’s price, or $193. In total, Royal Gold would advance $11,068 for what will be $26,000 of gold production ($1,300/year x 20 years).

There are other aspects to such a contract that provide additional financial benefits. But staying with this information for the moment, one can say that Royal Gold has the safety of paying drastically less than the current price of gold for its future production. There is a great deal of protection from downward volatility in gold prices in that contract. Additionally, the royalty percentage is often of the sliding variety: it might start at 1% of mine output, but with scheduled increases as the gold price rises above certain levels, up to 5% or more. Accordingly, there is positive operating leverage for Royal Gold in the event that gold prices rise.

Viewed this way, Royal Gold is better described as a merchant bank than a gold mining company. In a sense, it has as much in common with the activity of gold mining as JP Morgan Chase (JPM) has with an automobile manufacturer merely because the bank might have lent money to the car company. In actuality, the comparison with JP Morgan Chase is a poor one, since banks operate with extreme debt leverage, and Royal Gold operates with none. A further differentiation of Royal Gold’s business model from that of wither Microsoft or JP Morgan Chase: While Royal Gold has a $4 billion stock market capitalization, how many employees do you think it has? The answer is 20. For what it’s worth, the company states that none of them are subject to a labor contract or a collective bargaining agreement.



In a portfolio context, Royal Gold has long-term growth characteristics, because it does add new contracts to its portfolio of interests, and its earnings are positively associated with whatever economic conditions might lead to higher gold prices, one of which is inflation or the anticipation of inflation or geopolitical risk. Yet, because of its contract structure, it is remarkably well-insulated from price declines in that commodity. Accordingly, its profitability is not closely tied to the factors that impact the typical industrial or financial company and it should be a diversifying element in a portfolio. Its remarkably low correlation with the S&P 500 over the past half-dozen years, at 0.1334, is the statistical evidence. The visual evidence, from the pre-crisis date of mid-2008, is shown in the accompanying chart of Royal Gold relative to both a gold mining company index (Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF, GDX) and the SPDR Gold Shares ETF (GLD), which holds gold bullion.

Both Royal Gold and Silver Wheaton, which acquires primarily silver royalty interests and manifests somewhat different price patterns, are new holdings in the Core Value strategy. These follow, as mentioned in last quarter’s Commentary, additional investments in land companies such as Tri Pointe Homes and Brookfield Residential Properties. They also exhibit the characteristic of trading at prices well below the long-term realizations they should draw from their asset portfolios. They are, in practice, idiosyncratic securities that, much more than the large-cap companies that comprise the asset allocation index and ETF building blocks, will exhibit stock prices tied to their own financial development rather than to the public flow of funds. A portfolio comprised of such companies will be a more effectively diversified investment.

From Murray Stahl (Trades, Portfolio)’s Horizon Kinetics 3Q 2014 Commentary.

Check out Murray Stahl latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Royal Gold Inc

Meridian Funds Comments on Royal Gold Inc. Guru stock highlight
Royal Gold, Inc. (NASDAQ:RGLD) is a precious metals company with royalty claims on gold, silver, copper, lead, and zinc at mines in over 20 countries. While gold performed better than other commodities during the period, the precious metal declined as U.S. monetary policy tightened and the dollar appreciated. Another setback for the company was the deferral of gold from a mine in Chile operated by Barrick Gold, which temporarily stopped construction at the mine. However, we believe Royal Gold has an exceptional business model and we view our investment in the company as a great way to get exposure to gold. The company essentially pays miners upfront for the right to buy their metals later at reduced prices. It has no operational risk because it owns no mines, is a beneficiary of ounces growth, has pricing power, and typically earns an 8% return on a flat price. We have decided to be patient with Royal Gold and maintained a position in the stock. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward P/E 34.25
RGLD's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
87% of the 293 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 13.48 vs. RGLD: 34.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
P/B 2.02
RGLD's P/B is ranked lower than
55% of the 1611 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 1.75 vs. RGLD: 2.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
RGLD' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.75  Med: 2.19 Max: 5.93
Current: 2.02
0.75
5.93
P/S 11.44
RGLD's P/S is ranked lower than
87% of the 864 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 1.93 vs. RGLD: 11.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
RGLD' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.38  Med: 15.72 Max: 30.74
Current: 11.44
5.38
30.74
PFCF 52.72
RGLD's PFCF is ranked lower than
80% of the 336 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 15.34 vs. RGLD: 52.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
RGLD' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 24.22  Med: 52.79 Max: 310.72
Current: 52.72
24.22
310.72
POCF 20.73
RGLD's POCF is ranked lower than
80% of the 538 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 8.70 vs. RGLD: 20.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
RGLD' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.48  Med: 27.54 Max: 84.35
Current: 20.73
10.48
84.35
EV-to-EBIT 159.10
RGLD's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
95% of the 584 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 19.72 vs. RGLD: 159.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
RGLD' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.2  Med: 29.9 Max: 613.1
Current: 159.1
14.2
613.1
EV-to-EBITDA 27.91
RGLD's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
76% of the 655 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 12.34 vs. RGLD: 27.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
RGLD' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.3  Med: 19.3 Max: 40
Current: 27.91
9.3
40
Shiller P/E 83.97
RGLD's Shiller P/E is ranked lower than
83% of the 185 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 25.35 vs. RGLD: 83.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
RGLD' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 29.38  Med: 80.78 Max: 138.38
Current: 83.97
29.38
138.38
Current Ratio 7.50
RGLD's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
80% of the 1435 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 1.99 vs. RGLD: 7.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
RGLD' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.17  Med: 14.57 Max: 62.19
Current: 7.5
2.17
62.19
Quick Ratio 7.01
RGLD's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
79% of the 1434 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 1.52 vs. RGLD: 7.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
RGLD' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.17  Med: 13.86 Max: 62.19
Current: 7.01
2.17
62.19
Days Inventory 30.72
RGLD's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
82% of the 627 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 75.17 vs. RGLD: 30.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
RGLD' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.73  Med: 19.7 Max: 30.72
Current: 30.72
10.73
30.72
Days Sales Outstanding 40.67
RGLD's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
54% of the 612 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 37.04 vs. RGLD: 40.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
RGLD' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 38.58  Med: 91.45 Max: 117.05
Current: 40.67
38.58
117.05
Days Payable 26.30
RGLD's Days Payable is ranked lower than
67% of the 452 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 44.10 vs. RGLD: 26.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
RGLD' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 20.03  Med: 100.99 Max: 148.46
Current: 26.3
20.03
148.46

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 1.31
RGLD's Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
64% of the 663 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 1.45 vs. RGLD: 1.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
RGLD' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.52  Med: 0.81 Max: 3.37
Current: 1.31
0.52
3.37
Dividend Growth (3y) 6.70
RGLD's Dividend Growth (3y) is ranked higher than
67% of the 236 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: -19.80 vs. RGLD: 6.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Growth (3y) only.
RGLD' s Dividend Growth (3y) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 15.8 Max: 35.8
Current: 6.7
0
35.8
Forward Dividend Yield 1.40
RGLD's Forward Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
64% of the 618 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 2.17 vs. RGLD: 1.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield only.
N/A
Yield on cost (5-Year) 2.79
RGLD's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
60% of the 901 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 2.31 vs. RGLD: 2.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
RGLD' s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.11  Med: 1.72 Max: 7.17
Current: 2.79
1.11
7.17
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -0.10
RGLD's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
93% of the 1036 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: -11.90 vs. RGLD: -0.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
RGLD' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -23  Med: -5.3 Max: -0.1
Current: -0.1
-23
-0.1

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 2.05
RGLD's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
51% of the 1611 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 1.90 vs. RGLD: 2.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
RGLD' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.03  Med: 3.39 Max: 12.89
Current: 2.05
1.03
12.89
Price/Median PS Value 0.73
RGLD's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
76% of the 808 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 1.07 vs. RGLD: 0.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
RGLD' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.33  Med: 1.02 Max: 80
Current: 0.73
0.33
80
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 0.74
RGLD's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
67% of the 1609 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: -3.07 vs. RGLD: 0.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
RGLD' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.2  Med: 3.3 Max: 7
Current: 0.74
0.2
7
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) -15.56
RGLD's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked lower than
64% of the 290 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: -5.36 vs. RGLD: -15.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
RGLD' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -21  Med: 20.9 Max: 50.6
Current: -15.56
-21
50.6

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $403.7
EPS (TTM) $ -0.03
Beta0.72
Short Percentage of Float4.60%
52-Week Range $24.68 - 87.74
Shares Outstanding (Mil)65.32

Analyst Estimate

Jun17 Jun18 Jun19
Revenue (Mil $) 528 611 652
EPS ($) 2.80 3.76 3.74
EPS w/o NRI ($) 2.80 3.76 3.74
EPS Growth Rate
(3Y to 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends Per Share ($)
» More Articles for RGLD

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Barrick Gold Corporation: Update on Veladero and Kalgoorlie Sep 20 2016 
Here's Why Silver Wheaton Is a Buy Jul 20 2016 
A Mario Gabelli Analyst's Take on Royal Gold Jul 08 2016 
Preston Corp.: An Alternative Exposure to Booming Gold May 10 2016 
Meridian Funds Comments on Royal Gold Inc. Mar 08 2016 
First Eagle Investment Increases Flowserve Holding by 14% Feb 08 2016 
With U.S. Equities Remaining Bullish, How Do You Invest in Gold? Dec 01 2015 
Murray Stahl Focuses on Existing Stakes in Second Quarter Sep 09 2015 
4 Top Gold Stocks to Watch Mar 06 2015 
Gold Rush Jan 21 2015 

More From Other Websites
ETFs with exposure to Royal Gold, Inc. : December 1, 2016 Dec 01 2016
Is NRG Energy Inc (NRG) Going to Burn These Hedge Funds? Dec 01 2016
Royal Gold, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : RGLD-US : November 30,... Nov 30 2016
Analyzing the Correlation of Mining Stocks Nov 28 2016
Mining Stocks’ Volatility: A Comparison Nov 25 2016
Copper, Gold, and Silver Rose Early on November 22 Nov 23 2016
Where Do the Volatilities of Mining Stocks Point? Nov 23 2016
ROYAL GOLD INC Files SEC form 8-K, Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders Nov 17 2016
Assessing Mining Companies’ Recent Correlations with Gold Nov 16 2016
What’s Druckenmiller’s Take on Gold and Trump? Nov 16 2016
Royal Gold Increases Common Stock Dividend 4.4% to $0.96 per Share Nov 15 2016
Royal Gold Increases Common Stock Dividend 4.4% to $0.96 per Share Nov 15 2016
ROYAL GOLD INC Financials Nov 09 2016
Gold Up, But Pares Gains, As Trump's Win Hits Dollar, Fed Hopes Nov 09 2016
ETF’s with exposure to Royal Gold, Inc. : November 7, 2016 Nov 07 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)