Hide

FocusBar

Subscribe to Premium Member
Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.09
ROSE's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
63% of the 408 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.34 vs. ROSE: 0.09 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Cash to Debt Range
Min: 0   Max: No Debt
Current: 0.09

Equity to Asset 0.568
ROSE's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
54% of the 408 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.55 vs. ROSE: 0.568 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: 0.17   Max: 0.67
Current: 0.57

0.17
0.67
Interest Coverage 11.5
ROSE's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
62% of the 408 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.40 vs. ROSE: 11.5 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Interest Coverage Range
Min: 3   Max: No Debt
Current: 11.5

F-Score: 5
Z-Score: 3.6
M-Score: -3.19
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 9/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 45.60
ROSE's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
89% of the 408 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.80 vs. ROSE: 45.60 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: -111.1   Max: 50.4
Current: 45.6

-111.1
50.4
Net-margin (%) 26
ROSE's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
81% of the 408 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.00 vs. ROSE: 26 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: -74.6   Max: 35.2
Current: 26

-74.6
35.2
ROE (%) 19.8
ROSE's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
89% of the 408 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.00 vs. ROSE: 19.8 )
ROSE' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: -44.4   Max: 41.3
Current: 19.8

-44.4
41.3
ROA (%) 11.3
ROSE's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
89% of the 408 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.00 vs. ROSE: 11.3 )
ROSE' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: -24.9   Max: 11.3
Current: 11.3

-24.9
11.3
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 23.70
ROSE's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
90% of the 408 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.00 vs. ROSE: 23.70 )
ROSE' s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: -56.8   Max: 23.7
Current: 23.7

-56.8
23.7
Revenue Growth (%) 19.1
ROSE's Revenue Growth (%) is ranked higher than
85% of the 408 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.00 vs. ROSE: 19.1 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Revenue Growth (%) Range
Min: 0   Max: 44.6
Current: 19.1

0
44.6
» ROSE's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2012

ROSE Guru Trades in Q2 2012

Pioneer Investments 65,703 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 40,000 sh (New)
Jim Simons 187,222 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 127,731 sh (+846.09%)
First Pacific Advisors 96,300 sh (+24.58%)
David Dreman 63,675 sh (unchged)
Robert Rodriguez 1,541,100 sh (unchged)
RS Investment Management Sold Out
Columbia Wanger 1,421,500 sh (-2%)
» More
Q3 2012

ROSE Guru Trades in Q3 2012

First Pacific Advisors 3,069,900 sh (+3087.85%)
Pioneer Investments 102,782 sh (+56.43%)
David Dreman 63,825 sh (+0.24%)
Robert Rodriguez 1,541,100 sh (unchged)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Columbia Wanger 1,409,500 sh (-0.84%)
Jim Simons 56,800 sh (-69.66%)
» More
Q4 2012

ROSE Guru Trades in Q4 2012

RS Investment Management 1,769,536 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 666 sh (New)
Robert Rodriguez 1,541,100 sh (unchged)
David Dreman 63,825 sh (unchged)
Pioneer Investments Sold Out
Columbia Wanger 1,076,500 sh (-23.63%)
Jim Simons 21,500 sh (-62.15%)
First Pacific Advisors 630,300 sh (-79.47%)
» More
Q1 2013

ROSE Guru Trades in Q1 2013

Paul Tudor Jones 10,400 sh (New)
Diamond Hill Capital 411,195 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 514,400 sh (+77137.2%)
Jim Simons 702,422 sh (+3167.08%)
First Pacific Advisors 2,377,302 sh (+277.17%)
RS Investment Management 4,231,422 sh (+139.13%)
Columbia Wanger 1,506,100 sh (+39.91%)
David Dreman 65,150 sh (+2.08%)
Robert Rodriguez 1,441,302 sh (-6.48%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with ROSE

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
David Dreman 2012-03-31 New Buy0.07%$44.04 - $53.54 $ 47.893%63675
Robert Rodriguez 2011-12-31 Reduce -9.4%0.77%$32.24 - $54.34 $ 47.898%1551322
Joel Greenblatt 2011-12-31 Sold Out 0.1%$32.24 - $54.34 $ 47.898%0
Joel Greenblatt 2011-09-30 New Buy0.1%$36.24 - $56.82 $ 47.891%17231
Robert Rodriguez 2011-03-31 Reduce -16.81%1.94%$34.08 - $48.2 $ 47.8918%1969613
Robert Rodriguez 2010-12-31 Reduce -14.23%1.63%$23.34 - $37.85 $ 47.8956%2367500
Robert Rodriguez 2010-06-30 Reduce -18.05%1.5%$19.74 - $26.21 $ 47.89105%2760400
Robert Rodriguez 2010-03-31 Reduce -25.49%2.46%$18.16 - $24.97 $ 47.89121%3368319
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!

Top Ranked Articles about Rosetta Resources, Inc.

First Pacific Advisors Buys ROSE, CFN, HNT, Sells ESV, PETM, WMT
First Pacific Advisors is a highly respected value shop run by the legendary Bob Rodriguez. Unlike many pure bottom-up value shops, FPA pays close attention to macro picture. Their view of macro pictures helps them to understand better on the sustainability of the profit of the companies they are interested. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 13.30
ROSE's P/E(ttm) is ranked higher than
61% of the 216 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 16.80 vs. ROSE: 13.30 )
ROSE' s 10-Year P/E(ttm) Range
Min: 11.22   Max: 125.23
Current: 13.3

11.22
125.23
P/B 3.14
ROSE's P/B is ranked lower than
82% of the 383 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.33 vs. ROSE: 3.14 )
ROSE' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 0.36   Max: 5.46
Current: 3.14

0.36
5.46
P/S 3.74
ROSE's P/S is ranked lower than
54% of the 405 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.36 vs. ROSE: 3.74 )
ROSE' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 0.46   Max: 7.92
Current: 3.74

0.46
7.92
EV-to-EBIT 10.59
ROSE's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
67% of the 248 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 17.92 vs. ROSE: 10.59 )
ROSE' s 10-Year EV-to-EBIT Range
Min: 7.5   Max: 166.1
Current: 10.59

7.5
166.1

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Net Current Asset Value 37.5
ROSE's Price/Net Current Asset Value is ranked lower than
70% of the 293 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 22.00 vs. ROSE: 37.5 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Price/Net Current Asset Value Range
Min: 15.1   Max: 78.4
Current: 37.5

15.1
78.4
Price/Tangible Book 3.2
ROSE's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
80% of the 374 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.40 vs. ROSE: 3.2 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Price/Tangible Book Range
Min: 0.5   Max: 3.7
Current: 3.2

0.5
3.7
Price/Median PS Value 1.1
ROSE's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
64% of the 354 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.80 vs. ROSE: 1.1 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Price/Median PS Value Range
Min: 0.2   Max: 1.7
Current: 1.1

0.2
1.7
Price/Graham Number 1.5
ROSE's Price/Graham Number is ranked lower than
68% of the 197 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.10 vs. ROSE: 1.5 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Price/Graham Number Range
Min: 0.9   Max: 4.1
Current: 1.5

0.9
4.1
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) 9.40
ROSE's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) is ranked higher than
78% of the 408 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.80 vs. ROSE: 9.40 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) Range
Min: 0.6   Max: 13.3
Current: 9.4

0.6
13.3
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) -1.73
ROSE's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) is ranked higher than
50% of the 408 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -1.81 vs. ROSE: -1.73 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) Range
Min: -2.4   Max: 0.1
Current: -1.73

-2.4
0.1

Business Description

Rosetta Resources, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware in June 2005. It is an independent exploration and production company engaged in the acquisition and development of onshore energy resources in the United States of America. Its operations are primarily located in South Texas, including its producing area in the Eagle Ford shale, and in the Southern Alberta Basin in Northwest Montana. The company owns producing and non-producing oil and gas properties in proven or prospective basins that are primarily located in South Texas, including its producing area in the Eagle Ford shale, and in the Southern Alberta Basin in Northwest Montana. In 2011, the company drilled 64 gross and 53 net wells, with a net success rate of 100%. As of December 31, 2011, it owned approximately 115,000 net acres in South Texas. Its production in South Texas comes from the Eagle Ford shale trend and the Lobo and Olmos fields, which averaged 25.3 MBoe/d (152 MMcfe/d) in 2011, an increase of approximately 116% from the prior year. In Eagle Ford Shale the company holds approximately 65,000 net acres, with 50,000 net acres located in the liquids-rich area of the play. In 2011, the company continued its exploratory initiative in the Southern Alberta Basin in Northwest Montana. The play is a westward analog of the industry's Bakken and Three Forks plays of the Williston Basin in Montana and North Dakota. It control approximately 300,000 net acres in the play, either through option or lease agreements. On February 15, 2012, it entered into an agreement to sell its Lobo assets and a portion of its Olmos assets for $95.0 million, subject to customary adjustments and the receipt of appropriate consents for assignment.
Company Website
SEC Reports
Industry: Oil & Gas E&P
Compare:OJSCY, APC, APA, HRTPY, SGTZY
Traded in other countries:R91.Germany

Personalized Checklist








Within your circle of competence?
Macro economic environment favorable?
High quality business?
Enough margin of safety with stocks?
Gurus are buying?
Insiders are buying?
Management capable and shareholder friendly?
Catalyst for stock price to appreciate?
Your level of confidence with the research?

GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names
Free 7-day Trial