Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Equity to Asset 0.33
ROSE's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
76% of the 457 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.52 vs. ROSE: 0.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
ROSE' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: 0.33  Med: 0.57 Max: 0.69
Current: 0.33
0.33
0.69
Interest Coverage 7.65
ROSE's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
64% of the 301 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 23.27 vs. ROSE: 7.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
ROSE' s 10-Year Interest Coverage Range
Min: 2.64  Med: 8.38 Max: 9999.99
Current: 7.65
2.64
9999.99
F-Score: 5
Z-Score: -0.06
M-Score: -3.04
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) -58.23
ROSE's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
64% of the 475 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -14.83 vs. ROSE: -58.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
ROSE' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: -111.15  Med: 31.48 Max: 50.4
Current: -58.23
-111.15
50.4
Net-margin (%) -54.00
ROSE's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
64% of the 475 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -19.13 vs. ROSE: -54.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
ROSE' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: -74.56  Med: 16.08 Max: 35.18
Current: -54
-74.56
35.18
ROE (%) -44.52
ROSE's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
77% of the 511 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -9.85 vs. ROSE: -44.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
ROSE' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: -35.95  Med: 5.80 Max: 36.06
Current: -44.52
-35.95
36.06
ROA (%) -16.59
ROSE's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
69% of the 535 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -6.15 vs. ROSE: -16.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
ROSE' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: -21.55  Med: 3.81 Max: 12.84
Current: -16.59
-21.55
12.84
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) -19.79
ROSE's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
61% of the 520 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -8.63 vs. ROSE: -19.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
ROSE' s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: -41.63  Med: 10.12 Max: 31.27
Current: -19.79
-41.63
31.27
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 35.60
ROSE's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
85% of the 339 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 6.50 vs. ROSE: 35.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
ROSE' s 10-Year Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: -10.5  Med: 9.30 Max: 63.6
Current: 35.6
-10.5
63.6
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 40.60
ROSE's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
83% of the 294 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -1.60 vs. ROSE: 40.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
ROSE' s 10-Year EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: 0  Med: -1.20 Max: 40.6
Current: 40.6
0
40.6
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 38.60
ROSE's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
79% of the 265 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -0.10 vs. ROSE: 38.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
ROSE' s 10-Year EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: -31.1  Med: 38.60 Max: 188.4
Current: 38.6
-31.1
188.4
» ROSE's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2014

ROSE Guru Trades in Q3 2014

David Dreman 1,367 sh (+10.69%)
Diamond Hill Capital 923,930 sh (+7.30%)
RS Investment Management 2,213,305 sh (+4.56%)
First Pacific Advisors 3,310,000 sh (+3.64%)
Steven Cohen 1,606,400 sh (+1.07%)
Columbia Wanger 2,965,100 sh (+0.20%)
FPA Capital Fund 1,458,800 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen 500,000 sh (unchged)
Charles de Vaulx 715,992 sh (-4.88%)
RS Investment Management 2,116,827 sh (-70.99%)
» More
Q4 2014

ROSE Guru Trades in Q4 2014

Jim Simons 498,222 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 27,536 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 2,011,545 sh (+302.31%)
FPA Capital Fund 2,168,200 sh (+48.63%)
First Pacific Advisors 4,841,400 sh (+46.27%)
Diamond Hill Capital 997,458 sh (+7.96%)
RS Investment Management 2,375,991 sh (+7.35%)
First Pacific Advisors 4,906,400 sh (+1.34%)
Steven Cohen 500,000 sh (unchged)
David Dreman Sold Out
Steven Cohen 1,345,300 sh (-16.25%)
Columbia Wanger 2,269,400 sh (-23.46%)
Charles de Vaulx 261,300 sh (-63.51%)
» More
Q1 2015

ROSE Guru Trades in Q1 2015

David Dreman 6,911 sh (New)
Third Avenue Management 294,698 sh (New)
Jim Simons 1,010,947 sh (+102.91%)
RS Investment Management 2,901,326 sh (+22.11%)
FPA Capital Fund 2,565,802 sh (+18.34%)
First Pacific Advisors 5,545,802 sh (+14.55%)
Charles de Vaulx Sold Out
Diamond Hill Capital 944,830 sh (-5.28%)
Columbia Wanger 1,969,800 sh (-13.20%)
Steven Cohen 621,661 sh (-53.79%)
Paul Tudor Jones 12,400 sh (-54.97%)
» More
Q2 2015

ROSE Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Mario Gabelli 99,900 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 1,051,916 sh (+8383.19%)
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Columbia Wanger Sold Out
David Dreman Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
Diamond Hill Capital 943,115 sh (-0.18%)
Third Avenue Management 286,017 sh (-2.95%)
FPA Capital Fund 1,900,302 sh (-25.94%)
First Pacific Advisors 4,082,602 sh (-26.38%)
RS Investment Management 882,843 sh (-69.57%)
RS Investment Management 882,843 sh (-69.57%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with ROSE

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Guru Investment Theses on Rosetta Resources Inc

FPA Capital Fund Comments on Rosetta Resources Inc - Feb 19, 2015

Let us now discuss Rosetta Resources (ROSE). ROSE is an exploration & production company that generates approximately 90% of its production from the Eagle Ford Shale basin in southwest Texas and the remaining production from the Permian basin in west Texas. The Fund has owned various amounts of ROSE over the past eight years, with its peak share count occurring on or around the financial crisis when oil prices were similar to the current level. The Fund’s share count troughed at the end of 2013 at approximately 77% less than the peak share count and when oil prices were around the $100 level.

Given the subsequent plunge in oil prices and ROSE’s share price, the Fund increased its exposure by over 60% in the past two quarters. This is the hallmark of our investment strategy. That is, assuming our investment thesis remains intact, we buy stocks when prices are depressed and reduce or eliminate stocks when they are rich.

ROSE’s revenues from oil represented roughly 58% of their most recently reported quarter’s sales, with natural gas liquids (NGLs) and natural gas producing approximately 23% and 19%, respectively, of the remaining revenues. The decline in ROSE during the quarter can be attributed to the rapid decline in oil prices. The company not only performed well over the past year, earning among the highest operating profit margins for small-mid-cap publicly-traded E&P companies, but also we expect the company to increase its production in 2015, despite a substantial decline in its Capex this year. However, given the large decline in oil prices, we expect profits will be down materially this year, but unhedged pre-tax cash flow is estimated to be over $7 a share, given the current depressed spot oil price. It is also worth noting that we believe ROSE has approximately $350 million of hedge profits on its books, again given the current spot commodity prices.

From FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio) Q4 2014 Letter.

Check out FPA Capital Fund latest stock trades

Diamond Hill Capital Comments on Rosetta Resources Inc - Jul 25, 2014

Oil and gas exploration and production company Rosetta Resources, Inc. (ROSE) rose in anticipation of an ease in regulations on the exportation of condensate, an ultra-light oil that undergoes minimal processing. This could allow the condensate to be exported at higher prices, alleviating a potential condensate glut in the U.S. and benefitting Rosetta.

From Diamond Hill Capital (Trades, Portfolio)'s Small Cap Fund Second Quarter 2014 Commentary.

Check out Diamond Hill Capital latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Rosetta Resources Inc

FPA Capital Fund Comments on Rosetta Resources Inc
Let us now discuss Rosetta Resources (ROSE). ROSE is an exploration & production company that generates approximately 90% of its production from the Eagle Ford Shale basin in southwest Texas and the remaining production from the Permian basin in west Texas. The Fund has owned various amounts of ROSE over the past eight years, with its peak share count occurring on or around the financial crisis when oil prices were similar to the current level. The Fund’s share count troughed at the end of 2013 at approximately 77% less than the peak share count and when oil prices were around the $100 level. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward P/E 34.36
ROSE's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
61% of the 214 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 23.47 vs. ROSE: 34.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
P/B 1.46
ROSE's P/B is ranked lower than
74% of the 486 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.75 vs. ROSE: 1.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
ROSE' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 0.36  Med: 1.92 Max: 5.4
Current: 1.46
0.36
5.4
P/S 1.10
ROSE's P/S is ranked higher than
62% of the 437 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.52 vs. ROSE: 1.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
ROSE' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 0.46  Med: 3.59 Max: 10.41
Current: 1.1
0.46
10.41
POCF 2.32
ROSE's POCF is ranked higher than
65% of the 320 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.50 vs. ROSE: 2.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
ROSE' s 10-Year POCF Range
Min: 0.66  Med: 5.05 Max: 16.88
Current: 2.32
0.66
16.88
Shiller P/E 19.84
ROSE's Shiller P/E is ranked lower than
63% of the 139 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 12.62 vs. ROSE: 19.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
ROSE' s 10-Year Shiller P/E Range
Min: 11.16  Med: 21.34 Max: 101.67
Current: 19.84
11.16
101.67
Current Ratio 1.09
ROSE's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
59% of the 513 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.27 vs. ROSE: 1.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
ROSE' s 10-Year Current Ratio Range
Min: 0.53  Med: 1.06 Max: 2.35
Current: 1.09
0.53
2.35
Quick Ratio 1.09
ROSE's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
55% of the 513 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.20 vs. ROSE: 1.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
ROSE' s 10-Year Quick Ratio Range
Min: 0.53  Med: 1.06 Max: 2.35
Current: 1.09
0.53
2.35
Days Sales Outstanding 31.05
ROSE's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
70% of the 433 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 41.02 vs. ROSE: 31.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
ROSE' s 10-Year Days Sales Outstanding Range
Min: 30.62  Med: 52.13 Max: 129.25
Current: 31.05
30.62
129.25

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 1.46
ROSE's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
69% of the 455 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.81 vs. ROSE: 1.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
ROSE' s 10-Year Price/Tangible Book Range
Min: 0.5  Med: 1.90 Max: 4.9
Current: 1.46
0.5
4.9
Price/Median PS Value 0.31
ROSE's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
68% of the 403 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.48 vs. ROSE: 0.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
ROSE' s 10-Year Price/Median PS Value Range
Min: 0.16  Med: 0.99 Max: 2.43
Current: 0.31
0.16
2.43
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) -20.10
ROSE's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
67% of the 527 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -6.60 vs. ROSE: -20.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
ROSE' s 10-Year Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: -20.1  Med: 6.15 Max: 19.1
Current: -20.1
-20.1
19.1
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) -19.59
ROSE's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked lower than
57% of the 191 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -11.15 vs. ROSE: -19.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
ROSE' s 10-Year Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range
Min: -28.3  Med: -2.50 Max: 2.6
Current: -19.59
-28.3
2.6

Analyst Estimate

Dec15 Dec16
Revenue(Mil) 704 672
EPS($) -0.29 -0.44
EPS without NRI($) -0.29 -0.44

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - E&P » Oil & Gas E&P
Compare:OJSCY, APC, APA, HRTPY, SGTZY » details
Traded in other countries:R91.Germany,
Rosetta Resources Inc is a Delaware corporation was incorporated in June 2005. It is an exploration and production company engaged in the acquisition and development of onshore energy resources in the United States of America. Its operations are primarily located in the Eagle Ford shale in South Texas and in the Permian Basin in West Texas. The Company owns producing and non-producing oil and gas properties in proven or prospective basins that are primarily located in the Eagle Ford shale in South Texas and in the Permian Basin in West Texas. The Company drilled 111 gross wells and completed 79 gross wells in the Eagle Ford area in 2013. The Company acquired producing and undeveloped oil and natural gas interests in the Permian Basin in Gaines and Reeves Counties, Texas in the second quarter of 2013. The Permian Acquisition added roughly 40,000 net acres in the Wolfbone play in Reeves County in the Delaware Basin and 13,000 net acres in Gaines County in the Midland Basin. It drilled 39 gross operated wells and completed 32 gross operated wells in the Permian area in 2013. For 2013, production from the Permian area provided approximately 4% of our total production. The Company competes with a substantial number of other companies that have greater resources than the Company. The Company's operations are subject to extensive environmental, health and safety regulation by federal, state and local agencies.
» More Articles for ROSE

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
FPA Capital Fund Second Quarter 2015 Commentary Jul 28 2015 
FPA Capital Fund Sells Portions of 13 Stakes in Second Quarter Jul 13 2015 
Monday’s Pre-Market Insights: Rosetta Resources, Zulily, Aduro BioTech, Etsy May 11 2015 
FPA Capital Fund First Quarter 2015 Commentary May 06 2015 
Portfolio 1 May 05 2015 
FPA Capital Adds Two Stakes to Portfolio in First Quarter May 05 2015 
Why Rosetta Resources' Long-Term Prospects Are Bright Apr 28 2015 
Rosetta Resources' Operational Improvements Will Lead to Better Times Ahead Apr 20 2015 
Rosetta Resources' Strong Production Levels Are Indicative of a Better Future Feb 22 2015 
FPA Capital Fund Comments on Rosetta Resources Inc Feb 19 2015 

More From Other Websites
As oil prices cool, Colorado's DJ Basin stays hot, says Noble Energy CEO Aug 27 2015
NOBLE ENERGY INC (NBL) Earnings Report: Q2 2015 Conference Call Transcript Aug 03 2015
NOBLE ENERGY, INC. Financials Jul 23 2015
10-Q for Rosetta Resources, Inc. Jul 22 2015
Energy-Focused Fund’s Picks Returned 27% in Q2; See Them Inside Jul 22 2015
Noble Energy (NBL) Closes Rosetta Resources Acquisition - Analyst Blog Jul 21 2015
NBL TEXAS, LLC Files SEC form 8-K, Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Termination of a... Jul 21 2015
Noble Energy closes multibillion-dollar acquisition of rival Jul 20 2015
ROSETTA RESOURCES INC. Files SEC form 10-Q, Quarterly Report Jul 20 2015
Rosetta Resources reports 2Q loss Jul 17 2015
Rosetta Resources reports 2Q loss Jul 17 2015
Rosetta Resources Inc. Announces 2015 Second Quarter Financial and Operational Results Jul 17 2015
ROSETTA RESOURCES INC. Files SEC form 8-K, Results of Operations and Financial Condition, Financial... Jul 17 2015
Natural Gas Prices Hit Monthly Highs on Warmer Weather Forecasts Jul 16 2015
Heritage Plaza owner: "We're not concerned" after Rosetta exit Jul 15 2015
Natural Gas Prices Fall ahead of the EIA’s Report Jul 15 2015
PayPal Holdings Set to Join S&P 100 & 500; Others to Join S&P MidCap 400 and S&P SmallCap 600 Jul 14 2015
Natural Gas Prices Rise due to Warmer Weather Estimates Jul 14 2015
FPA Capital Fund Sells Portions of 13 Stakes in Second Quarter Jul 13 2015
Lifshitz & Miller Law Firm Announces Investigation of EZCORP, Inc., Frisch's Restaurants, Inc., OM... Jun 16 2015

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK