Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.13
ROSE's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
64% of the 857 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.73 vs. ROSE: 0.13 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Cash to Debt Range
Min: 0   Max: No Debt
Current: 0.13

Equity to Asset 0.41
ROSE's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
67% of the 873 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.55 vs. ROSE: 0.41 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: 0.17   Max: 0.67
Current: 0.41

0.17
0.67
Interest Coverage 9.63
ROSE's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
72% of the 568 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 15.61 vs. ROSE: 9.63 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Interest Coverage Range
Min: 2.64   Max: 9999.99
Current: 9.63

2.64
9999.99
F-Score: 4
Z-Score: 1.53
M-Score: -2.82
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 42.53
ROSE's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
95% of the 884 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 5.97 vs. ROSE: 42.53 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: -111.15   Max: 50.4
Current: 42.53

-111.15
50.4
Net-margin (%) 24.49
ROSE's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
92% of the 884 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.79 vs. ROSE: 24.49 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: -74.56   Max: 35.18
Current: 24.49

-74.56
35.18
ROE (%) 14.79
ROSE's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
93% of the 954 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -0.51 vs. ROSE: 14.79 )
ROSE' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: -44.45   Max: 41.26
Current: 14.79

-44.45
41.26
ROA (%) 6.08
ROSE's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
91% of the 992 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -0.72 vs. ROSE: 6.08 )
ROSE' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: -24.92   Max: 11.25
Current: 6.08

-24.92
11.25
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 12.02
ROSE's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
92% of the 978 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -0.65 vs. ROSE: 12.02 )
ROSE' s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: -55.32   Max: 22.58
Current: 12.02

-55.32
22.58
Revenue Growth (%) 32.80
ROSE's Revenue Growth (%) is ranked higher than
90% of the 661 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 11.20 vs. ROSE: 32.80 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Revenue Growth (%) Range
Min: -10.5   Max: 63.6
Current: 32.8

-10.5
63.6
EBITDA Growth (%) 38.20
ROSE's EBITDA Growth (%) is ranked higher than
91% of the 606 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 4.90 vs. ROSE: 38.20 )
ROSE' s 10-Year EBITDA Growth (%) Range
Min: 0   Max: 38.2
Current: 38.2

0
38.2
EPS Growth (%) 109.30
ROSE's EPS Growth (%) is ranked higher than
97% of the 516 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.20 vs. ROSE: 109.30 )
ROSE' s 10-Year EPS Growth (%) Range
Min: -31.1   Max: 188.4
Current: 109.3

-31.1
188.4
» ROSE's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2013

ROSE Guru Trades in Q2 2013

RS Investment Management 7,081,517 sh (+67.36%)
Diamond Hill Capital 653,355 sh (+58.89%)
First Pacific Advisors 2,960,302 sh (+24.52%)
Columbia Wanger 1,506,100 sh (unchged)
FPA Capital Fund 1,441,302 sh (unchged)
Stanley Druckenmiller Sold Out
David Dreman 62,300 sh (-4.37%)
Jim Simons 604,322 sh (-13.97%)
Steven Cohen 388,065 sh (-24.56%)
Paul Tudor Jones 6,500 sh (-37.5%)
» More
Q3 2013

ROSE Guru Trades in Q3 2013

Diamond Hill Capital 748,225 sh (+14.52%)
Columbia Wanger 1,635,100 sh (+8.57%)
RS Investment Management 7,227,921 sh (+2.07%)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
David Dreman Sold Out
FPA Capital Fund 1,419,402 sh (-1.52%)
First Pacific Advisors 2,843,502 sh (-3.95%)
Steven Cohen 248,469 sh (-35.97%)
Jim Simons 35,822 sh (-94.07%)
» More
Q4 2013

ROSE Guru Trades in Q4 2013

Pioneer Investments 314,168 sh (New)
Charles de Vaulx 929,643 sh (New)
Jim Simons 116,722 sh (+225.84%)
Diamond Hill Capital 861,260 sh (+15.11%)
RS Investment Management 7,592,146 sh (+5.04%)
Columbia Wanger 1,635,100 sh (unchged)
First Pacific Advisors 2,229,102 sh (-21.61%)
FPA Capital Fund 1,058,702 sh (-25.41%)
Steven Cohen 46,614 sh (-81.24%)
» More
Q1 2014

ROSE Guru Trades in Q1 2014

FPA Capital Fund 1,338,300 sh (+26.41%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with ROSE

» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Top Ranked Articles about Rosetta Resources, Inc.

FPA Capital's Third Quarter Top Five Stocks
First Pacific Advisors Capital Fund and the FPA New Income Fund, reported their third quarter portfolio holdings earlier today. FPA Capital primarily invests in the stocks of smaller companies, and according to his investing philosophy they base their investments on the following criteria: strong balance sheets, free cash flow, an understandable and successful business strategy under capable management and unique business characteristics. Read more...
FPA Capital Comments on Rosetta Resources
ROSE) is a stock the Fund has owned for over six years and has performed exceptionally well. The stock has declined more than 6% this year, primarily because the company issued over eight million new shares, or an increase of over 15% to shares outstanding, to fund the acquisition of Comstock Resources' (CRK) Permian Basin assets. CRK was highly leveraged and did not have the capital to develop its Permian Basin oil reserves and, thus, was forced to sell these very promising reserves. With this purchase, ROSE picked up some of the most sought-after reserves without having to pay a premium. Nonetheless, in the short term, ROSE's stock Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 14.30
ROSE's P/E(ttm) is ranked higher than
81% of the 469 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 21.70 vs. ROSE: 14.30 )
ROSE' s 10-Year P/E(ttm) Range
Min: 11.22   Max: 125.23
Current: 14.3

11.22
125.23
P/B 2.20
ROSE's P/B is ranked higher than
55% of the 941 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.50 vs. ROSE: 2.20 )
ROSE' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 0.36   Max: 5.4
Current: 2.2

0.36
5.4
P/S 3.60
ROSE's P/S is ranked higher than
56% of the 892 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.50 vs. ROSE: 3.60 )
ROSE' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 0.46   Max: 10.41
Current: 3.6

0.46
10.41
EV-to-EBIT 12.50
ROSE's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
75% of the 639 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 17.12 vs. ROSE: 12.50 )
ROSE' s 10-Year EV-to-EBIT Range
Min: 7.5   Max: 166.1
Current: 12.5

7.5
166.1
Shiller P/E 4508.70
ROSE's Shiller P/E is ranked lower than
74% of the 321 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 24.56 vs. ROSE: 4508.70 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Shiller P/E Range
Min: 0   Max: 10385.4
Current: 4508.7

0
10385.4

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 2.20
ROSE's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
54% of the 919 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.60 vs. ROSE: 2.20 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Price/Tangible Book Range
Min: 0.5   Max: 3.68
Current: 2.2

0.5
3.68
Price/Median PS Value 1.00
ROSE's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
62% of the 821 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.90 vs. ROSE: 1.00 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Price/Median PS Value Range
Min: 0.19   Max: 1.72
Current: 1

0.19
1.72
Price/Graham Number 1.20
ROSE's Price/Graham Number is ranked higher than
75% of the 460 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.40 vs. ROSE: 1.20 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Price/Graham Number Range
Min: 0.95   Max: 4.09
Current: 1.2

0.95
4.09
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) 8.00
ROSE's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) is ranked higher than
78% of the 656 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 5.70 vs. ROSE: 8.00 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) Range
Min: 0.6   Max: 13.3
Current: 8

0.6
13.3
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) -4.21
ROSE's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) is ranked higher than
85% of the 753 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -12.50 vs. ROSE: -4.21 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) Range
Min: -5.6   Max: -1
Current: -4.21

-5.6
-1

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - E&P » Oil & Gas E&P
Compare:OJSCY, APC, APA, HRTPY, SGTZY » details
Traded in other countries:R91.Germany
Rosetta Resources, Inc., a Delaware corporation was incorporated in June 2005. It is an exploration and production company involved in the acquisition and development of onshore energy resources in the United States of America. Its operations are primarily located in South Texas. The company owns producing and non-producing oil and gas properties in proven or prospective basins that are primarily located in South Texas. In 2012, the company drilled 85gross and 82 net wells, with a net success rate of 100%. As of December 31, 2012, it owned approximately 72,000 net acres in South Texas. Its production in South Texas comes from the Eagle Ford area which averaged 35.9 MBoe/d an increase of approximately 67% from the prior year. In Eagle Ford Shale the company holds approximately 67,000 net acres, with 53,000 net acres located in the liquids-rich area of the play. In 2012, the company drilled three gross wells in the Southern Alberta Basin in Northwest Montana. The play is a westward analog of the industry's Bakken and Three Forks plays of the Williston Basin in Montana and North Dakota. It control approximately 300,000 net acres in the play, either through option or lease agreements. In 2012, it sold its Lobo assets and a portion of its Olmos assets for $95.0 million. The oil and natural gas industry is subject to extensive laws that are subject to change. These laws have a significant impact on oil and natural gas exploration, production and marketing activities and increase the cost of doing business, and consequently, affect profitability.

Personalized Checklist








Within your circle of competence?
Macro economic environment favorable?
High quality business?
Enough margin of safety with stocks?
Gurus are buying?
Insiders are buying?
Management capable and shareholder friendly?
Catalyst for stock price to appreciate?
Your level of confidence with the research?

Add Notes, Comments or Ask Questions

User Comments

No comment yet

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
Free 7-day Trial
FEEDBACK
Hide