Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.01
ROSE's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
52% of the 1074 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.48 vs. ROSE: 0.01 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Cash to Debt Range
Min: 0.01   Max: N/A
Current: 0.01

Equity to Asset 0.38
ROSE's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
67% of the 1045 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.53 vs. ROSE: 0.38 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: 0.37   Max: 0.69
Current: 0.38

0.37
0.69
Interest Coverage 7.65
ROSE's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
70% of the 699 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 19.97 vs. ROSE: 7.65 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Interest Coverage Range
Min: 2.64   Max: 9999.99
Current: 7.65

2.64
9999.99
F-Score: 5
Z-Score: 0.55
M-Score: -1.61
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) -24.19
ROSE's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
71% of the 1077 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.52 vs. ROSE: -24.19 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: -111.15   Max: 50.4
Current: -24.19

-111.15
50.4
Net-margin (%) -20.69
ROSE's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
73% of the 1077 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -8.28 vs. ROSE: -20.69 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: -74.56   Max: 35.18
Current: -20.69

-74.56
35.18
ROE (%) -17.94
ROSE's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
69% of the 1162 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -5.95 vs. ROSE: -17.94 )
ROSE' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: -35.95   Max: 36.06
Current: -17.94

-35.95
36.06
ROA (%) -6.88
ROSE's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
73% of the 1202 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -4.12 vs. ROSE: -6.88 )
ROSE' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: -21.55   Max: 12.84
Current: -6.88

-21.55
12.84
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) -8.82
ROSE's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
74% of the 1185 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -3.33 vs. ROSE: -8.82 )
ROSE' s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: -41.76   Max: 31.27
Current: -8.82

-41.76
31.27
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 35.60
ROSE's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
93% of the 805 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 7.60 vs. ROSE: 35.60 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: -10.5   Max: 63.6
Current: 35.6

-10.5
63.6
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 40.60
ROSE's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
93% of the 690 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.80 vs. ROSE: 40.60 )
ROSE' s 10-Year EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: 0   Max: 40.6
Current: 40.6

0
40.6
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 38.60
ROSE's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
91% of the 596 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.70 vs. ROSE: 38.60 )
ROSE' s 10-Year EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: -31.1   Max: 188.4
Current: 38.6

-31.1
188.4
» ROSE's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2014

ROSE Guru Trades in Q2 2014

David Dreman 1,235 sh (+32.80%)
First Pacific Advisors 3,193,900 sh (+14.26%)
FPA Capital Fund 1,458,800 sh (+9.00%)
Pioneer Investments 431,840 sh (+0.24%)
Diamond Hill Capital 861,040 sh (+0.14%)
Steven Cohen 50,000 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen 1,589,421 sh (unchged)
Columbia Wanger 2,959,100 sh (-0.17%)
Charles de Vaulx 752,762 sh (-19.03%)
RS Investment Management 2,116,827 sh (-70.99%)
» More
Q3 2014

ROSE Guru Trades in Q3 2014

David Dreman 1,367 sh (+10.69%)
Diamond Hill Capital 923,930 sh (+7.30%)
RS Investment Management 2,213,305 sh (+4.56%)
First Pacific Advisors 3,310,000 sh (+3.64%)
Steven Cohen 1,606,400 sh (+1.07%)
Columbia Wanger 2,965,100 sh (+0.20%)
FPA Capital Fund 1,458,800 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen 500,000 sh (unchged)
Charles de Vaulx 715,992 sh (-4.88%)
RS Investment Management 2,116,827 sh (-70.99%)
» More
Q4 2014

ROSE Guru Trades in Q4 2014

Jim Simons 498,222 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 27,536 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 2,011,545 sh (+302.31%)
FPA Capital Fund 2,168,200 sh (+48.63%)
First Pacific Advisors 4,841,400 sh (+46.27%)
Diamond Hill Capital 997,458 sh (+7.96%)
RS Investment Management 2,375,991 sh (+7.35%)
First Pacific Advisors 4,906,400 sh (+1.34%)
Steven Cohen 500,000 sh (unchged)
David Dreman Sold Out
Steven Cohen 1,345,300 sh (-16.25%)
Columbia Wanger 2,269,400 sh (-23.46%)
Charles de Vaulx 261,300 sh (-63.51%)
» More
Q1 2015

ROSE Guru Trades in Q1 2015

David Dreman 6,911 sh (New)
Third Avenue Management 294,698 sh (New)
Jim Simons 1,010,947 sh (+102.91%)
RS Investment Management 2,901,326 sh (+22.11%)
FPA Capital Fund 2,565,802 sh (+18.34%)
First Pacific Advisors 5,545,802 sh (+14.55%)
Diamond Hill Capital 944,830 sh (-5.28%)
Columbia Wanger 1,969,800 sh (-13.20%)
Steven Cohen 621,661 sh (-53.79%)
Paul Tudor Jones 12,400 sh (-54.97%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with ROSE

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Guru Investment Theses on Rosetta Resources Inc

FPA Capital Fund Comments on Rosetta Resources Inc - Feb 19, 2015

Let us now discuss Rosetta Resources (ROSE). ROSE is an exploration & production company that generates approximately 90% of its production from the Eagle Ford Shale basin in southwest Texas and the remaining production from the Permian basin in west Texas. The Fund has owned various amounts of ROSE over the past eight years, with its peak share count occurring on or around the financial crisis when oil prices were similar to the current level. The Fund’s share count troughed at the end of 2013 at approximately 77% less than the peak share count and when oil prices were around the $100 level.

Given the subsequent plunge in oil prices and ROSE’s share price, the Fund increased its exposure by over 60% in the past two quarters. This is the hallmark of our investment strategy. That is, assuming our investment thesis remains intact, we buy stocks when prices are depressed and reduce or eliminate stocks when they are rich.

ROSE’s revenues from oil represented roughly 58% of their most recently reported quarter’s sales, with natural gas liquids (NGLs) and natural gas producing approximately 23% and 19%, respectively, of the remaining revenues. The decline in ROSE during the quarter can be attributed to the rapid decline in oil prices. The company not only performed well over the past year, earning among the highest operating profit margins for small-mid-cap publicly-traded E&P companies, but also we expect the company to increase its production in 2015, despite a substantial decline in its Capex this year. However, given the large decline in oil prices, we expect profits will be down materially this year, but unhedged pre-tax cash flow is estimated to be over $7 a share, given the current depressed spot oil price. It is also worth noting that we believe ROSE has approximately $350 million of hedge profits on its books, again given the current spot commodity prices.

From FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio) Q4 2014 Letter.

Check out FPA Capital Fund latest stock trades

Diamond Hill Capital Comments on Rosetta Resources Inc - Jul 25, 2014

Oil and gas exploration and production company Rosetta Resources, Inc. (ROSE) rose in anticipation of an ease in regulations on the exportation of condensate, an ultra-light oil that undergoes minimal processing. This could allow the condensate to be exported at higher prices, alleviating a potential condensate glut in the U.S. and benefitting Rosetta.

From Diamond Hill Capital (Trades, Portfolio)'s Small Cap Fund Second Quarter 2014 Commentary.

Check out Diamond Hill Capital latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Rosetta Resources Inc

FPA Capital Fund Comments on Rosetta Resources Inc
Let us now discuss Rosetta Resources (ROSE). ROSE is an exploration & production company that generates approximately 90% of its production from the Eagle Ford Shale basin in southwest Texas and the remaining production from the Permian basin in west Texas. The Fund has owned various amounts of ROSE over the past eight years, with its peak share count occurring on or around the financial crisis when oil prices were similar to the current level. The Fund’s share count troughed at the end of 2013 at approximately 77% less than the peak share count and when oil prices were around the $100 level. Read more...
Diamond Hill Capital Comments on Rosetta Resources Inc
Oil and gas exploration and production company Rosetta Resources, Inc. (ROSE) rose in anticipation of an ease in regulations on the exportation of condensate, an ultra-light oil that undergoes minimal processing. This could allow the condensate to be exported at higher prices, alleviating a potential condensate glut in the U.S. and benefitting Rosetta. Read more...
First Pacific Advisors Reports Second Quarter Top Holdings
First Pacific Advisors Capital Fund and the FPA New Income Fund, reported their second quarter portfolio holdings earlier this week. FPA Capital primarily invests in the stocks of smaller companies, and according to his investing philosophy they base their investments on the following criteria: strong balance sheets, free cash flow, an understandable and successful business strategy under capable management and unique business characteristics.
Over the past quarter the portfolio managers at FPA Capital added one new stock to their portfolio, keeping the total number of stocks to 29 which are valued at $1.032 billion.
The following five stocks are FPA Capital’s largest holdings as of the close of the second quarter.
Rosetta Resources (ROSE)
The fund’s largest holding is in Rosetta Resources where they maintain 1,458,800 shares of the company’s stock. This position makes up for 7.8% of their total portfolio as well as 2.39% of the company’s shares outstanding.
During the first quarter FPA increased their position 9% by purchasing 120,500 shares. They bought these shares in the price range of $44.79 to $54.85 per share, with an estimated average quarterly price of $48.50 per share. Since then the price per share has increased approximately 16.7%.
The fund’s holding history of Rosetta as of the second quarter:

Rosetta is an exploration and production company involved in the acquisition and development of onshore energy resources in the U.S. The company owns producing and non-producing oil and gas properties in proven or prospective basins that are primarily located in South Texas.
Rosetta Resources’ historical revenue and net income:

The analysis on Rosetta reports that the price is nearing a 10-year high, its P/S ratio is nearing a 1-year high and it has issued $769 million of debt over the past three years.
The Peter Lynch Chart suggests that the company is currently undervalued:

Rosetta Resources has a market cap of $3.24 billion. Its shares are currently trading at around $52.74 with a P/E ratio of 17.60, a P/S ratio of 3.80 and a P/B ratio of 2.30.
Rowan Companies (RDC)
The fund’s second largest holding goes to Rowan Companies where they hold on to 2,119,700 shares of the company’s stock. This position in the company represents 6.6% of their total portfolio as well as 1.71% of the company’s shares outstanding.
The fund increased their holdings in Rowan Companies 2.61% over the past quarter, buying 54,000 shares of the company’s stock. The guru bought these shares near the estimated average quarterly price of $31.31 per share and since then the price per share has dropped approximately -1.4%.
FPA Capital’s historical holding history:

Rowan Companies is a provider of international and domestic contract drilling services. The company also owns and operates a manufacturing division that produces equipment for the drilling, mining and timber industries.
Rowan Companies’ historical revenue and net income:

The analysis on Rowan Companies reports that the revenue has been in decline for the past five years, the operating margin has been in a 5-year decline and the P/S ratio is nearing a 2-year low.
The Peter Lynch Chart suggests that the company is currently overvalued:

Rowan Companies has a market cap of $3.9 billion. Its shares are currently trading at around $31.39 with a P/E ratio of 16.00, a P/S ratio of 2.50 and a P/B ratio of 0.77. The company had an annual average earnings growth of 4.40% over the past ten years.
Arrow Electronics (ARW)
FPA Capital’s third largest holding is in Arrow Electronics where they hold on to 1,129,600 shares of the company’s stock. The fund position represents 6.6% of their total portfolio and 1.13% of the company’s shares outstanding.
Over the past quarter the portfolio managers at FPA Capital cut their holdings in ARW -10% by selling 125,500 shares of the company’s stock. The fund sold these in the second quarter price range of $48.82 to $59.79, with an estimated average quarterly price of $58.22. Since then the price per share has increased approximately 3.8%.
Rodriguez’s historical holding history:

Arrow Electronics is a global provider of products, services and solutions to industrial and commercial users of electronic components and computer products. The company offers products and services such as materials planning, new product design, programming, inventory management and a variety of online supply chain tools.
Arrow Electronics’ historical revenue and net income:

The analysis on Arrow Electronics reports that the company’s revenue has slowed down over the past year, the price is nearing a 10-year high and it has issued $695.574 million of debt over the past three years.
The Peter Lynch Chart suggests that the company is currently undervalued:

There are currently nine gurus with positions in Arrow Electronics. Check out their holdings here.
Arrow Electronics has a market cap of $6.02 billion. Its shares are currently trading at around $60.44 with a P/E ratio of 14.50, a P/S ratio of 0.30 and a P/B ratio of 1.40. The company had an annual average earnings growth of 25.20% over the past five years.
Avnet Inc. (AVT)
The fund’s fourth largest position is in Avnet where they hold on to 1,541,600 shares of the company’s stock. This position makes up for 6.6% of the fund’s total portfolio as well as for 1.12% of the company’s shares outstanding.
FPA did not alter their holdings in Avnet over the past quarter. The fund sold shares in the first quarter of 2014 at around the Q1 estimated average quarterly price of $42.84 per share, and since then the price per share has increased a minor 1.5%.
The fund’s historical holding history:

Avnet is an industrial distributor of electronic components, enterprise computer and storage products and embedded subsystems. The company creates a link in the technology supply chain that connects the world's electronic component and computer product manufacturers and software developers with its customer base.
Avnet’s historical revenue and net income:

The analysis on Avnet reports that the company’s revenue has slowed down over the past year, its price is nearing a 10-year high and it has issued $513.415 million of debt.
The Peter Lynch Chart suggests that the company is currently undervalued:

Avnet has a market cap of $6.01 billion. Its shares are currently trading at around $43.40 with a P/E ratio of 12.60, a P/S ratio of 0.20 and a P/B ratio of 1.30.
Apollo Education (APOL)
The fund’s fifth largest holding is in Apollo Education Group where they maintain 2,107,600 shares of the company’s stock. This position makes up for 6.4% of their total portfolio as well as 1.87% of the company’s shares outstanding.
During the second quarter FPA increased their position 17.93% by adding 320,500 shares. They bought these shares in the price range of $26.64 to $34.70 per share, with an estimated average quarterly price of $28.74 per share. Since then the price per share has increased approximately 8.8%.
FPA Capital’s historical holding history:

Apollo Group offers distinctive educational programs and services both online and on-campus at the undergraduate, masters and doctoral levels principally through these wholly-owned educational subsidiaries: The University of Phoenix, Institute for Professional Development and The College for Financial Planning Institutes Corporation.
Apollo Group’s historical revenue and net income:

The analysis on Apollo Group reports that the company’s revenue has been in decline over the past year and that its operating margin has been in a 5-year decline.
The Peter Lynch Chart suggests that the company is currently overvalued:

Apollo Education Group has a market cap of $3.24 billion. Its shares are currently trading at around $29.57 with a P/E ratio of 16.60, a P/S ratio of 1.10 and a P/B ratio of 2.69. The company had an annual average earnings growth of 9.70%.
Check out Robert Rodriguez’s completer second quarter holdings here.
Try a free 7-day premium membership trial here. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward P/E 34.36
ROSE's Forward P/E is ranked higher than
79% of the 1359 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.00 vs. ROSE: 34.36 )
N/A
P/B 1.20
ROSE's P/B is ranked higher than
68% of the 1359 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.25 vs. ROSE: 1.20 )
ROSE' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 0.36   Max: 5.4
Current: 1.2

0.36
5.4
P/S 1.16
ROSE's P/S is ranked higher than
82% of the 1359 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.96 vs. ROSE: 1.16 )
ROSE' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 0.46   Max: 10.41
Current: 1.16

0.46
10.41
POCF 2.48
ROSE's POCF is ranked higher than
93% of the 1359 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 11.00 vs. ROSE: 2.48 )
ROSE' s 10-Year POCF Range
Min: 0.66   Max: 16.88
Current: 2.48

0.66
16.88
EV-to-EBIT -11.98
ROSE's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
64% of the 1359 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.00 vs. ROSE: -11.98 )
ROSE' s 10-Year EV-to-EBIT Range
Min: -99.4   Max: 166.1
Current: -11.98

-99.4
166.1
Shiller P/E 23.20
ROSE's Shiller P/E is ranked higher than
89% of the 1359 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.00 vs. ROSE: 23.20 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Shiller P/E Range
Min: 11.16   Max: 101.67
Current: 23.2

11.16
101.67
Current Ratio 1.03
ROSE's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
72% of the 1177 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.29 vs. ROSE: 1.03 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Current Ratio Range
Min: 0.53   Max: 2.35
Current: 1.03

0.53
2.35
Quick Ratio 1.03
ROSE's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
73% of the 1177 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.24 vs. ROSE: 1.03 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Quick Ratio Range
Min: 0.53   Max: 2.35
Current: 1.03

0.53
2.35
Days Sales Outstanding 26.72
ROSE's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
91% of the 1359 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 54.55 vs. ROSE: 26.72 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Days Sales Outstanding Range
Min: 30.62   Max: 129.25
Current: 26.72

30.62
129.25

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 1.10
ROSE's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
83% of the 1359 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.50 vs. ROSE: 1.10 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Price/Tangible Book Range
Min: 0.5   Max: 3.68
Current: 1.1

0.5
3.68
Price/Median PS Value 0.30
ROSE's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
91% of the 1359 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.90 vs. ROSE: 0.30 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Price/Median PS Value Range
Min: 0.15   Max: 2.41
Current: 0.3

0.15
2.41
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) -8.60
ROSE's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) is ranked higher than
60% of the 1171 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -0.30 vs. ROSE: -8.60 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) Range
Min: -8.6   Max: 19.1
Current: -8.6

-8.6
19.1
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) -12.28
ROSE's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) is ranked higher than
77% of the 480 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -2.37 vs. ROSE: -12.28 )
ROSE' s 10-Year Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) Range
Min: -28.3   Max: 2.6
Current: -12.28

-28.3
2.6

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - E&P » Oil & Gas E&P
Compare:OJSCY, APC, APA, HRTPY, SGTZY » details
Traded in other countries:R91.Germany,
Rosetta Resources Inc is a Delaware corporation was incorporated in June 2005. It is an exploration and production company engaged in the acquisition and development of onshore energy resources in the United States of America. Its operations are primarily located in the Eagle Ford shale in South Texas and in the Permian Basin in West Texas. The Company owns producing and non-producing oil and gas properties in proven or prospective basins that are primarily located in the Eagle Ford shale in South Texas and in the Permian Basin in West Texas. The Company drilled 111 gross wells and completed 79 gross wells in the Eagle Ford area in 2013. The Company acquired producing and undeveloped oil and natural gas interests in the Permian Basin in Gaines and Reeves Counties, Texas in the second quarter of 2013. The Permian Acquisition added roughly 40,000 net acres in the Wolfbone play in Reeves County in the Delaware Basin and 13,000 net acres in Gaines County in the Midland Basin. It drilled 39 gross operated wells and completed 32 gross operated wells in the Permian area in 2013. For 2013, production from the Permian area provided approximately 4% of our total production. The Company competes with a substantial number of other companies that have greater resources than the Company. The Company's operations are subject to extensive environmental, health and safety regulation by federal, state and local agencies.
» More Articles for ROSE

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Monday’s Pre-Market Insights: Rosetta Resources, Zulily, Aduro BioTech, Etsy May 11 2015 
FPA Capital Fund First Quarter 2015 Commentary May 06 2015 
Portfolio 1 May 05 2015 
FPA Capital Adds Two Stakes to Portfolio in First Quarter May 05 2015 
Why Rosetta Resources' Long-Term Prospects Are Bright Apr 28 2015 
Rosetta Resources' Operational Improvements Will Lead to Better Times Ahead Apr 20 2015 
Rosetta Resources' Strong Production Levels Are Indicative of a Better Future Feb 22 2015 
FPA Capital Fund Comments on Rosetta Resources Inc Feb 19 2015 
Steven Romick's FPA Capital Q3 Commentary Oct 25 2014 
Diamond Hill Capital Comments on Rosetta Resources Inc Jul 25 2014 

More From Other Websites
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Brodsky & Smith, LLC Announces Investigation of The Board of Directors of Rosetta... May 21 2015
Business Highlights May 21 2015
ROSETTA SHAREHOLDER NOTICE: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Announces the Investigation of Rosetta Resources,... May 21 2015
Fundraising of £3.1m by way of a conditional placing and subscription. Development economic update.... May 20 2015
Cowen Analyst Offers Potential M&A Laundry List In Oil Patch May 19 2015
Target Rosetta Spikes, Acquirer Noble Slumps on Acquisition Plan May 19 2015
ROSE INVESTOR ALERT: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong Launches an Investigation of the Board of... May 19 2015
ROSETTA RESOURCES INC. SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. Announces Investigation Of Buyout May 19 2015
Rosetta Resources downgraded by Global Hunter Securities May 19 2015
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Brodsky & Smith, LLC Announces Investigation of The Board of Directors of Rosetta... May 19 2015
ROSE SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Notifies Shareholders of Rosetta Resources, Inc. of... May 18 2015
Noble Energy deal for Rosetta sets the benchmark for M&A industry wide, IHS says May 18 2015
ROSETTA RESOURCES INC. Files SEC form 8-K, Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders May 18 2015
Law Offices of Marc S. Henzel Announces Securities Class Action Periods May 18 2015
EQUITY ALERT: The Rosen Law Firm Announces Investigation of Rosetta Resources Inc. Concerning its... May 15 2015
Saudi oil victory lap? May 14 2015
ROSE INVESTOR ALERT: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong Launches an Investigation of the Board of... May 14 2015
ROSETTA RESOURCES INC. SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. Announces Investigation Of Buyout May 13 2015
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Brower Piven Commences An Investigation Into The Proposed Sale Of Rosetta... May 13 2015
Harwood Feffer LLP Announces Investigation of Rosetta Resources Inc. May 13 2015

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK