Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 1.46
SNE's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
62% of the 2586 Companies
in the Global Consumer Electronics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.46 vs. SNE: 1.46 )
SNE' s 10-Year Cash to Debt Range
Min: 0.21   Max: 1.46
Current: 1.46

0.21
1.46
Equity to Asset 0.15
SNE's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
72% of the 2572 Companies
in the Global Consumer Electronics industry.

( Industry Median: 0.55 vs. SNE: 0.15 )
SNE' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: 0.14   Max: 0.32
Current: 0.15

0.14
0.32
Interest Coverage 0.03
SNE's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
73% of the 1603 Companies
in the Global Consumer Electronics industry.

( Industry Median: 105.08 vs. SNE: 0.03 )
SNE' s 10-Year Interest Coverage Range
Min: 0.03   Max: 8.31
Current: 0.03

0.03
8.31
F-Score: 5
Z-Score: 0.81
M-Score: -2.69
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 0.76
SNE's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
51% of the 2593 Companies
in the Global Consumer Electronics industry.

( Industry Median: 3.94 vs. SNE: 0.76 )
SNE' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: -4.28   Max: 7.7
Current: 0.76

-4.28
7.7
Net-margin (%) -1.34
SNE's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
56% of the 2593 Companies
in the Global Consumer Electronics industry.

( Industry Median: 2.90 vs. SNE: -1.34 )
SNE' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: -7.36   Max: 4.16
Current: -1.34

-7.36
4.16
ROE (%) -4.58
SNE's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
59% of the 2566 Companies
in the Global Consumer Electronics industry.

( Industry Median: 5.78 vs. SNE: -4.58 )
SNE' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: -19.96   Max: 13.62
Current: -4.58

-19.96
13.62
ROA (%) -0.69
SNE's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
54% of the 2599 Companies
in the Global Consumer Electronics industry.

( Industry Median: 3.00 vs. SNE: -0.69 )
SNE' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: -3.48   Max: 3.69
Current: -0.69

-3.48
3.69
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 7.49
SNE's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
61% of the 2590 Companies
in the Global Consumer Electronics industry.

( Industry Median: 10.52 vs. SNE: 7.49 )
SNE' s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: -14.38   Max: 25.27
Current: 7.49

-14.38
25.27
Revenue Growth (%) 1.90
SNE's Revenue Growth (%) is ranked higher than
65% of the 1915 Companies
in the Global Consumer Electronics industry.

( Industry Median: 2.60 vs. SNE: 1.90 )
SNE' s 10-Year Revenue Growth (%) Range
Min: -16.7   Max: 28.1
Current: 1.9

-16.7
28.1
EBITDA Growth (%) -0.40
SNE's EBITDA Growth (%) is ranked higher than
65% of the 1558 Companies
in the Global Consumer Electronics industry.

( Industry Median: 2.30 vs. SNE: -0.40 )
SNE' s 10-Year EBITDA Growth (%) Range
Min: -24.4   Max: 124.3
Current: -0.4

-24.4
124.3
EPS Growth (%) -21.50
SNE's EPS Growth (%) is ranked higher than
50% of the 1389 Companies
in the Global Consumer Electronics industry.

( Industry Median: 2.30 vs. SNE: -21.50 )
SNE' s 10-Year EPS Growth (%) Range
Min: -62.7   Max: 151.8
Current: -21.5

-62.7
151.8
» SNE's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2013

SNE Guru Trades in Q3 2013

Steven Cohen 11,338 sh (New)
Mario Gabelli 390,300 sh (+3293.91%)
Jim Simons 1,274,000 sh (+896.87%)
PRIMECAP Management 20,558,339 sh (+35.79%)
Jean-Marie Eveillard 800 sh (unchged)
Dodge & Cox Sold Out
Charles Brandes 9,700 sh (-0.87%)
» More
Q4 2013

SNE Guru Trades in Q4 2013

Caxton Associates 80,688 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 94,037 sh (+729.4%)
Mario Gabelli 1,578,100 sh (+304.33%)
PRIMECAP Management 20,646,139 sh (+0.43%)
Jean-Marie Eveillard 800 sh (unchged)
Charles Brandes Sold Out
Jim Simons 980,900 sh (-23.01%)
» More
Q1 2014

SNE Guru Trades in Q1 2014

PRIMECAP Management 32,700,741 sh (+58.39%)
Mario Gabelli 1,960,900 sh (+24.26%)
Jim Simons 1,170,000 sh (+19.28%)
Jean-Marie Eveillard 800 sh (unchged)
Caxton Associates Sold Out
Steven Cohen 63,096 sh (-32.9%)
» More
Q2 2014

SNE Guru Trades in Q2 2014

Mario Gabelli 3,040,140 sh (+55.04%)
PRIMECAP Management 35,279,841 sh (+7.89%)
Jean-Marie Eveillard 800 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons 546,900 sh (-53.26%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with SNE

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
Mario Gabelli 2014-06-30 Add 55.04%0.1%$15.99 - $19.44 $ 17.360%3040140
PRIMECAP Management 2014-03-31 Add 58.39%0.26%$15.25 - $18.65 $ 17.361%32700741
Mario Gabelli 2014-03-31 Add 24.26%0.04%$15.25 - $18.65 $ 17.361%1960900
Mario Gabelli 2013-12-31 Add 304.33%0.11%$16.61 - $21.2 $ 17.36-6%1578100
Charles Brandes 2013-12-31 Sold Out $16.61 - $21.2 $ 17.36-6%0
PRIMECAP Management 2013-09-30 Add 35.79%0.15%$19.66 - $23.01 $ 17.36-18%20558339
Mario Gabelli 2013-09-30 Add 3293.91%0.05%$19.66 - $23.01 $ 17.36-18%390300
Dodge & Cox 2013-09-30 Sold Out $19.66 - $23.01 $ 17.36-18%0
Dodge & Cox 2013-06-30 Reduce -47.7%$16.18 - $22.91 $ 17.36-8%25765
Charles Brandes 2013-06-30 New Buy$16.18 - $22.91 $ 17.36-8%9785
Charles Brandes 2013-03-31 Sold Out 0.33%$10.72 - $17.77 $ 17.3620%0
Dodge & Cox 2013-03-31 Reduce -99.6%0.18%$10.72 - $17.77 $ 17.3620%49265
Dodge & Cox 2012-12-31 Reduce -50.5%0.19%$9.63 - $12.35 $ 17.3659%12246984
Mario Gabelli 2012-03-31 New Buy$16.77 - $22.26 $ 17.36-6%11900
Jean-Marie Eveillard 2011-12-31 Reduce -96.15%$16.27 - $22.38 $ 17.36-6%800
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Guru Investment Theses on Sony Corp

Daniel Loeb Comments on Sony - Jan 22, 2014

Sony (SNE) – While the rejection of Third Point's proposal to partially list the Entertainment business proved costly for shareholders, we are hopeful that the Company's commitment to improve transparency, increase margins, better allocate capital among divisions, and hold division management accountable will lead to our goal: increasing shareholder value. Despite the rise in the Company share price earlier in the year, Sony shares still trade significantly below their sum of the parts valuation. 

Sony started 2014 strongly at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, winning two best-of-show awards for PlayStation 4 and the Xperia phone. The show's highlight was news that Sony had sold 4.2 million Playstation 4's in 2013 versus 3.0 million Xbox One's. Sony appears set to sustain strong global momentum with the Japanese launch of the Playstation 4 in February. February is also rumore d to mark the launch of Sony's Xperia Z2 phone, with the potential for meaningful distribution expansion in North America and elsewhere.

Progress on Sony's growth vectors, while encouraging, needs to be matched by a serious effort to restructure the PC and TV businesses as well as more concerted efforts to realize Entertainment 's value.

Japanese investors reacted favorably to management teams who took bold restructuring action in 2013, and the market is looking for Sony to pursue a similar path. 

Meanwhile, we are focused on upcoming catalysts including the IPO of Japan Display indicated for 1Q ' 14, progress at VEVO, and increasing focus on Sony's considerable intellectual property portfolio. Sony, a perennial top 10 U.S. patent approval recipient (#4 in 2013) with over 50,000 patents and several distinct patent assets, including stakes in InterTrust, MobileMedia Ideas, and participation in the Rockstar Consortium, still exhibits a disconnect between the implied value of the Electronics business and the underlying value of its intellectual property. 

All eyes are focused on management to reach its margin targets both within the Electronics and Entertainment divisions over the course of the coming year. We have high hopes for CEO Hirai and his lieutenants to continue their path towards greater profitability and to make difficult decisions when necessary to reach those goals

 

 

From Daniel Loeb (Trades, Portfolio)'s Third Point fourth quarter 2013 commentary.

Check out Daniel Loeb latest stock trades

Daniel Loeb Comments on Sony Corporation - Jul 30, 2013

Equity Position: Sony Corporation (SNE)

Third Point acquired a significant stake in Sony Corporation ("Sony") earlier this year, and in May, we unveiled a proposal to increase value by partially listing Sony's Entertainment ("Entertainment") business in the U.S. Our investment thesis is that Sony – composed of Electronics, Finance, and Entertainment – is not well understood by investors and is therefore significantly undervalued. Sony's Entertainment division has leading franchises in movie and television production and distribution via Columbia Pictures and Sony Pictures Television, and is one of the top recorded music and publishing companies in the world. Sony also has coveted global cable network assets, including a strong position in the fast-growing Indian market. Electronics is best known for its struggling televisions and VAIO computers but its true value lies in its strong semiconductor and video game console divisions, and its resurgent smartphone business. At the time we made our initial investment, we believed that at our purchase price we were acquiring Entertainment at an attractive value while receiving Electronics nearly for free, giving us a substantial margin of safety.

In addition to its appealing valuation, we believed Sony would benefit from the economic tailwinds created by the First and Second Arrows of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's economic plan, i.e., a weaker currency and fiscal stimulus would immediately benefit Sony's margins and drive earnings per share. But it was not until we became familiar with Abe's Third Arrow that we became confident Sony was an ideal candidate to benefit from the type of structural reform recommended by his administration. Following recent victories in the Upper House, Premier Abe is now well-positioned to begin enacting his much-anticipated reforms to modernize Japan's economy and corporations. Like the rest of the world, we are eagerly awaiting these changes, which should benefit Japanese companies like Sony.

Finally, the Sony management team installed last April seems to have broken a long string of challenged leadership and has started to make some difficult decisions in the Electronics business by reducing overhead and cutting the number of products offered. Highlyregarded CEO Kazuo Hirai deserves plaudits for the green shoots increasingly visible in Electronics. Sony's Xperia Z smartphone is a hit, and new product momentum has built meaningfully over the last few months while competitors have been losing ground. Sony is introducing an array of new Xperia models, including a large screen "phablet" device, the Xperia Z Ultra, and new Xperia C and SP devices for China Unicom and China Mobile. The launch of Sony's refreshed Xperia line has been a success in Japan, where Sony has overtaken Apple as#1 in smartphone market share, and in Europe, where Sony has risen to #3 in smartphone share. The upcoming launch of the Honami smartphone and other products in China and the U.S. should offer further opportunities for Sony to gain share in smartphones.

Strong momentum in the smartphone business has been accompanied by a perfectly executed introduction of the PlayStation 4 ("PS4") platform. The PS4 is set to gain share versus its competitors – the Wii and Xbox – with better hardware performance, new title breadth, and attractive launch pricing. Sony's consumer-friendly approach also stands to benefit investors with better initial hardware margins than PlayStation 3, increased market share and the growth, revenue and profit contributions ofthe PlayStation Network. The visible improvement in Sony's new products has caused us to rethink our approach to valuing Electronics. The Game and Mobile Products divisions are now poised to join the Devices business as meaningful profit contributors, while the Television business is becoming only a marginal drag.

Putting these encouraging gains into perspective, they are modest in light of the longerterm challenges facing Sony and the Japanese electronics industry. Drastic – rather than incremental – action is required. Third Point's proposal to partially list Entertainment should not only increase overall profitability but also provide capital to accelerate restructuring at Electronics, against a backdrop of increasingly fierce global competition. Turning to another challenge: unlike Electronics, Entertainment remains poorly managed, with a famously bloated corporate structure, generous perk packages, high salaries for underperforming senior executives, and marketing budgets that do not seem to be in line with any sense of return on capital invested. We were surprised that after Entertainment's highly-touted big budget summer film releases – After Earth and White House Down – bombed spectacularly at the box office, CEO Hirai, speaking at the Allen & Co. Sun Valley conference a few weeks ago, brushed off these failures, saying:

"I don't worry about the Entertainment business, it's doing just fine"

We find it perplexing that Mr. Hirai does not worry about a division that has just released 2013's versions of Waterworld and Ishtar back-to-back, instead giving free passes to Sony Pictures Entertainment Co-CEO's Michael Lynton and Amy Pascal, the executives responsible for these debacles. Unfortunately, Mr. Hirai's remark is consistent with accounts we have heard repeatedly from key industry players and others: under Mr. Lynton and Ms. Pascal's leadership, Entertainment's culture is characterized by a complete lack of accountability and poor financial controls. To us, these latest blunders are prima facie evidence of our thesis that Entertainment's U.S.-based business is being ineffectively overseen and needs its own governance structure led by a board whose job it will be to worry about such troubling results.

We are also surprised that Sony's CEO does not worry that Entertainment continues to generate profitability levels far below those of its competitors. Based on publicly-available peer data as of March 31, 2013, Entertainment has trailing twelve month EBITDA margins that are 700 basis points below peers in the Pictures division and 380 basis points below peers in the Music division, despite the fact that each is an industry leader in revenue terms. If Entertainment achieved peer margins, EBITDA could increase nearly $800 million to just over $2.0 billion.

Entertainment's poor relative performance has been a chronic phenomenon extending back to the famously profligate Guber-Peters regime, suggesting the current configuration of these businesses – far from offering synergies to shareholders – is in fact undermining Sony's value potential. Keeping Entertainment underexposed, undervalued and underperforming is not a strategy for success. Sony's investors today would be hardpressed to explain the composition of Entertainment or the key value drivers at work. While management goes to great lengths to explain the strategy for Electronics, it treats Entertainmentlike its "red-headed stepchild", addressing itin only three slides in a twentysix slide analyst day presentation made just a week after Third Point announced its proposal. At a moment when Entertainment was of paramount interest to investors, management barely addressed its significance, business strategy or profitability expectations. Given Entertainment's perpetual underperformance, perhaps Sony's reluctance to discuss it candidly stems from (understandable) embarrassment.

From a creative point of view, we are concerned about Entertainment's 2014 and 2015 slate, which lacks lucrative "tent pole" franchises. Anecdotally, we understand that its development pipeline is bleak, despite overspending on numerous projects. We are also disappointed to see that Sony's television business lacks new material and instead relies on old Merv Griffin Productions workhorses like Jeopardy and Wheel of Fortune. Entertainment has no hit network television shows, only one major syndicated network show– the Dr. Oz Show, and has missed the market for unscripted television.

Meanwhile, our research continues to reveal Entertainment's hidden value. We believe the Pictures unit profitability is anchored in higher margin (and higher multiple) international cable networks and television production, with the film business offering negligible profitability. This makes apples-to-apples comparisons with peer film studios (which lack the benefit of cable networks in those segments) even more unflattering. Nevertheless, we believe the film unit possesses considerable library cash flow value, currently masked by poor new production profitability, as well as significant asset value in its Culver City lot. Beyond the hidden value in the film business, we see meaningful value in the Music division, particularly in VEVO and GraceNote.

Absent a major improvement in transparency and accountability, Entertainment's fortunes are unlikely to change and Sony's full potential will remain unrealized. We are continuing to study Entertainment's businesses, uncovering opportunities for improvement in strategy, culture and operations that bolster our view that it would benefit significantly from our proposal. The suggestion that the status quo of opacity, underperformance and under-management is superior to transparency, management accountability and distinct leadership seems to be based on the misguided notion that the status quo strategy has worked over the last two decades. By contrast, our proposal for a public listing of Entertainment provides investors with a compelling opportunity – offering focused leadership, direct exposure to high-value international cable networks, significant margin improvement head-room, structural catalysts, hidden asset values and capital return. The status quo offers Sony and its shareholders only more of the same unfulfilled potential.

While CEO Hirai focuses on Electronics, Entertainment is in desperate need of proper supervision. We believe Sony's Board, which we understand continues to consider our suggestions, has plenty of reasons to worry about Entertainment and should enact our partial listing proposal quickly. A resurgent Electronics combined with a well-managed, publicly-listed Entertainment business would make for a stronger Sony and offer tremendous value for shareholders.

From Third Point's second quarter 2013 letter.
Check out Daniel Loeb latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Sony Corp

Daniel Loeb Comments on Sony
Sony (SNE) – While the rejection of Third Point's proposal to partially list the Entertainment business proved costly for shareholders, we are hopeful that the Company's commitment to improve transparency, increase margins, better allocate capital among divisions, and hold division management accountable will lead to our goal: increasing shareholder value. Despite the rise in the Company share price earlier in the year, Sony shares still trade significantly below their sum of the parts valuation.  Read more...
Guru Mario Gabelli's Top Five Third Quarter Portfolio Increases
Mario Gabelli is the founder, chairman and CEO of Gabelli Asset Management Company Investors (GAMCO Investors). GAMCO Investors is best known for its research-driven, value-oriented equity investing expertise which is based on the principles of Graham & Dodd — that is, investing in undervalued companies that have a high probability of achieving their intrinsic or private value over time. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/B 0.90
SNE's P/B is ranked higher than
81% of the 2529 Companies
in the Global Consumer Electronics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.54 vs. SNE: 0.90 )
SNE' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 0.41   Max: 2.04
Current: 0.9

0.41
2.04
P/S 0.30
SNE's P/S is ranked higher than
90% of the 2554 Companies
in the Global Consumer Electronics industry.

( Industry Median: 0.93 vs. SNE: 0.30 )
SNE' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 0.12   Max: 0.87
Current: 0.3

0.12
0.87
PFCF 3.50
SNE's PFCF is ranked higher than
97% of the 1376 Companies
in the Global Consumer Electronics industry.

( Industry Median: 17.32 vs. SNE: 3.50 )
SNE' s 10-Year PFCF Range
Min: 2.99   Max: 237.21
Current: 3.5

2.99
237.21
EV-to-EBIT 32.34
SNE's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
55% of the 1897 Companies
in the Global Consumer Electronics industry.

( Industry Median: 14.41 vs. SNE: 32.34 )
SNE' s 10-Year EV-to-EBIT Range
Min: 9.9   Max: 130.8
Current: 32.34

9.9
130.8
Current Ratio 0.88
SNE's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
70% of the 2592 Companies
in the Global Consumer Electronics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.92 vs. SNE: 0.88 )
SNE' s 10-Year Current Ratio Range
Min: 0.8   Max: 1.6
Current: 0.88

0.8
1.6
Quick Ratio 0.70
SNE's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
66% of the 2592 Companies
in the Global Consumer Electronics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.40 vs. SNE: 0.70 )
SNE' s 10-Year Quick Ratio Range
Min: 0.61   Max: 1.13
Current: 0.7

0.61
1.13

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 1.30
SNE's Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
60% of the 1709 Companies
in the Global Consumer Electronics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.66 vs. SNE: 1.30 )
SNE' s 10-Year Dividend Yield Range
Min: 0.46   Max: 2.81
Current: 1.3

0.46
2.81
Dividend growth (3y) -4.00
SNE's Dividend growth (3y) is ranked higher than
66% of the 859 Companies
in the Global Consumer Electronics industry.

( Industry Median: -0.10 vs. SNE: -4.00 )
SNE' s 10-Year Dividend growth (3y) Range
Min: 0   Max: 21.6
Current: -4

0
21.6
Yield on cost (5-Year) 1.09
SNE's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked lower than
71% of the 1763 Companies
in the Global Consumer Electronics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.86 vs. SNE: 1.09 )
SNE' s 10-Year Yield on cost (5-Year) Range
Min: 0.38   Max: 2.35
Current: 1.09

0.38
2.35
Share Buyback Rate -0.80
SNE's Share Buyback Rate is ranked higher than
71% of the 1371 Companies
in the Global Consumer Electronics industry.

( Industry Median: -0.80 vs. SNE: -0.80 )
SNE' s 10-Year Share Buyback Rate Range
Min: 18.2   Max: -25.7
Current: -0.8

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 2.00
SNE's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
52% of the 2378 Companies
in the Global Consumer Electronics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.74 vs. SNE: 2.00 )
SNE' s 10-Year Price/Tangible Book Range
Min: 0.84   Max: 8.12
Current: 2

0.84
8.12
Price/DCF (Projected) 0.40
SNE's Price/DCF (Projected) is ranked higher than
94% of the 1192 Companies
in the Global Consumer Electronics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.23 vs. SNE: 0.40 )
SNE' s 10-Year Price/DCF (Projected) Range
Min: 0.23   Max: 18.7
Current: 0.4

0.23
18.7
Price/Median PS Value 0.60
SNE's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
94% of the 2480 Companies
in the Global Consumer Electronics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.13 vs. SNE: 0.60 )
SNE' s 10-Year Price/Median PS Value Range
Min: 0.35   Max: 6.23
Current: 0.6

0.35
6.23
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) 3.10
SNE's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) is ranked lower than
51% of the 2269 Companies
in the Global Consumer Electronics industry.

( Industry Median: 6.50 vs. SNE: 3.10 )
SNE' s 10-Year Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) Range
Min: 0.8   Max: 10.1
Current: 3.1

0.8
10.1
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) 30.04
SNE's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) is ranked higher than
94% of the 1667 Companies
in the Global Consumer Electronics industry.

( Industry Median: 3.01 vs. SNE: 30.04 )
SNE' s 10-Year Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) Range
Min: -5.7   Max: 34.8
Current: 30.04

-5.7
34.8

Business Description

Industry: Computer Hardware » Consumer Electronics
Compare:TOSYY, PHG, LPL, HAR, WHR » details
Traded in other countries:6758.Japan, SON.UK, SONA.Germany, SON1.Germany, SNEJF.USA, 0Q0A.country
Sony Corporation was incorporated on 7 May 1946 as Tokyo Tsushin Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha. In January 1958, it changed its name to Sony Corporation. The Company develops, designs, manufactures and sells electronic equipment, instruments and devices for consumer, professional and industrial markets as well as game hardware and software. The Company is also engaged in production and acquisition, development, manufacture, marketing, distribution and broadcasting of image-based software, including motion picture, home entertainment and television products and distribution of recorded music. It also provides financial services, including life and non-life insurance operations through its Japanese insurance subsidiaries and banking operations through a Japanese internet-based banking subsidiary. In addition, the Company is engaged in a network services business and an advertising agency business in Japan. The Company's activities are subject to various governmental regulations in the different countries in which it operates, including regulations relating to various business/investment approvals, trade affairs including customs, import and export control, competition and antitrust, anti-bribery, intellectual property, broadcasting, consumer and business taxation, among others.
» More Articles for NYSE:SNE

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Mantis Vision Unveils Tablet Advocating 3D Technology Sep 19 2014 
GoPro Is Valued For High Growth Rates, But From Where? Sep 19 2014 
Why This Electronics Retailer's Turnaround Cannot Be Ruled Out Sep 17 2014 
Samsung’s Generation Next Gizmos Unveiled Sep 04 2014 
Will This Gaming Stock Continue Getting Better? Aug 29 2014 
Will Sony’s Latest Smartphone Create Ripples In The Mid-Range Smartphone Market? Aug 29 2014 
How to Invest in Gaming Stocks Aug 28 2014 
How to Take Emotions Out of Investing, with Rupal Bhansali of Ariel Investments Aug 20 2014 
OmniVision Technologies: Smartphones Are Catalysts for This Stock Jul 22 2014 
Is Apple Planning The Smartest Move Into the Luxury Segment Of The Wearable’s Sector? Jul 14 2014 


More From Other Websites
Sony PlayStation TV's US debut is a good thing: Pro Sep 22 2014
[video] Could Sony's PlayStation TV Replace Apple TV or Roku? Sep 22 2014
Sony PlayStation TV to hit stores on Oct. 14 Sep 22 2014
Sony PlayStation TV to hit stores on October 14 Sep 22 2014
Sony PlayStation TV to hit stores on October 14 Sep 22 2014
Sony PlayStation TV to hit stores on Oct. 14 Sep 22 2014
Sony to Begin Selling PlayStation TV Product in Octobober Sep 22 2014
PlayStation TV launches October 14th in US and Canada Sep 22 2014
Analyst: Sony Could Come To Completely Dominate Console Space Sep 22 2014
Playing iPhone sales strength Sep 22 2014
Destiny's 'Loot Cave' Showcases Bungie's Lingering Endgame Problems Sep 22 2014
PlayStation Now's creator explains how game streaming came to Sony Sep 21 2014
Sony Xperia Z3 Review: Sony Improves On Its Vision Of A Perfect Smartphone Sep 21 2014
Feedback Loop: Kickstarter refunds, Sony A7 impressions, and more! Sep 21 2014
Sony's SmartEyeglass to be available for purchase by March Sep 21 2014
Oculus Announces New 'Crescent Bay' VR Headset Sep 20 2014
ISIS Uses 'GTA 5' In New Teen Recruitment Video Sep 20 2014
Sony brings Video Unlimited to Mac and PC browsers everywhere Sep 20 2014
In Defense of Destiny: What Bungie Got Right Sep 19 2014
Another China-Japan Fight, This Time Over Condoms Sep 19 2014

Personalized Checklist








Within your circle of competence?
Macro economic environment favorable?
High quality business?
Enough margin of safety with stocks?
Gurus are buying?
Insiders are buying?
Management capable and shareholder friendly?
Catalyst for stock price to appreciate?
Your level of confidence with the research?

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
Free 7-day Trial
FEEDBACK